Remifentanil versus Remifentanil/midazolam for Ambulatory Surgery during Monitored Anesthesia Care

Background: This study was designed to define the appropriate dose of remifentanil hydrochloride alone or combined with midazolam to provide satisfactory comfort and maintain adequate respiration for a monitored anesthesia care setting.

Methods: One hundred fifty-nine patients scheduled for outpatient surgery participated in this multicenter, double-blind study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: remifentanil, 1 micro gram/kg, given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 0.1 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil); remifentanil, 0.5 micro gram/kg, given over 30 s followed by a continuous infusion of 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil + midazolam). Five minutes after the start of the infusion, patients received a loading dose of saline placebo (remifentanil) or midazolam, 1 mg, (remifentanil + midazolam). If patients were not oversedated, a second dose of placebo or midazolam, 1 mg, was given. Remifentanil was titrated (in increments of 50% from the initial rate) to limit patient discomfort or pain intraoperatively, and the infusion was terminated at the completion of skin closure.

Results: At the time of the local anesthetic, most patients in the remifentanil and remifentanil + midazolam groups experienced no pain (66% and 60%, respectively) and no discomfort (66% and 65%, respectively). The final mean (+/- SD) remifentanil infusion rates were 0.12 +/- 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil) and 0.07 +/- 0.03 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil + midazolam). Fewer patients in the remifentanil + midazolam group experienced nausea compared with the remifentanil group (16% vs. 36%, respectively; P < 0.05). Four patients (5%) in the remifentanil group and two patients (2%) in the remifentanil + midazolam group experienced brief periods of oxygen desaturation (SpO2 < 90%) and hypoventilation (< 8 breaths/min).     

Remifentanil versus Morphine Analgesia and Sedation for Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Double Blind Study

Background: The rapid onset and offset of action of remifentanil could make it quickly adjustable to the required level of sedation in critically ill patients. The authors hypothesized that the efficacy of a remifentanil-based regimen was greater than that of a morphine-based regimen.

Methods: Forty intent-to-treat patients were randomly allocated to receive a blinded infusion of either remifentanil 0.15 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1 or morphine 0.75 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1. The opioid infusion was titrated, in the first intent, to achieve optimal sedation defined as Sedation Agitation scale of 4. A midazolam open-label infusion was started if additional sedation was required.

Results: The mean percentage hours of optimal sedation was significantly longer in the remifentanil group (78.3 +/- 6.2) than in the morphine group (66.5 +/- 8.5). This was achieved with less frequent infusion rate adjustments (0.34 +/- 0.25 changes/h) than in the morphine group (0.42 +/- 0.22 changes/h). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and extubation time were significantly longer in the morphine group (18.1 +/- 3.4 h, 73 +/- 7 min) than in the remifentanil group (14.1 +/- 2.8 h, 17 +/- 6 min), respectively. Remifentanil mean infusion rate was 0.13 +/- 0.03 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1, whereas morphine mean infusion rate was 0.68 +/- 0.28 [mu]g[middle dot]kg-1[middle dot]min-1. More subjects in the morphine group (9 of 20) than in the remifentanil group (6 of 20) required midazolam. The incidence of adverse events was low and comparable across the two treatment groups.     

Comparison of Remifentanil and Fentanyl in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy for Supratentorial Space-occupying Lesions

Background: Remifentanil hydrochloride is an ultra-short-acting, esterase-metabolized micro-opioid receptor agonist. This study compared the use of remifentanil or fentanyl during elective supratentorial craniotomy for space-occupying lesions.

Methods: Sixty-three adults gave written informed consent for this prospective, randomized, double-blind, multiple-center trial. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental, pancuronium, nitrous oxide/oxygen, and fentanyl (n = 32; 2 micro gram [center dot] kg [center dot] sup -1 min sup -1) or remifentanil (n = 31; 1 micro [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1). After tracheal intubation, infusion rates were reduced to 0.03 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (fentanyl) or 0.2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (remifentanil) and then adjusted to maintain anesthesia and stable hemodynamics. Isoflurane was given only after specified infusion rate increases had occurred. At the time of the first burr hole, intracranial pressure was measured in a subset of patients. At bone flap replacement either saline (fentanyl group) or remifentanil ([nearly equal] 0.2 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1) were infused until dressing completion. Hemodynamics and time to recovery were monitored for 60 min. Analgesic requirements and nausea and vomiting were observed for 24 h. Neurological examinations were performed before operation and on postoperative days 1 and 7.

Results: Induction hemodynamics were similar. Systolic blood pressure was greater in the patients receiving fentanyl after tracheal intubation (fentanyl = 127 +/- 18 mmHg; remifentanil = 113 +/- 18 mmHg; P = 0.004). Intracranial pressure (fentanyl = 14 +/- 13 mmHg; remifentanil = 13 +/- 10 mmHg) and cerebral perfusion pressure (fentanyl = 76 +/- 19 mmHg; remifentanil = 78 +/- 14 mmHg) were similar. Isoflurane use was greater in the patients who received fentanyl. Median time to tracheal extubation was similar (fentanyl = 4 min: range = -1 to 40 min; remifentanil = 5 min: range = 1 to 15 min). Seven patients receiving fentanyl and none receiving remifentanil required naloxone. Postoperative systolic blood pressure was greater (fentanyl = 134 +/- 16 mmHg; remifentanil = 147 +/- 15 mmHg; P = 0.001) and analgesics were required earlier in patients receiving remifentanil. Incidences of nausea and vomiting were similar.     

Pharmacokinetics Anesthesiologists, and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil in Persons with Renal Failure Compared with Healthy Volunteers

Background: Remifentanil is an opioid analgesic for use in anesthesia. An ester linkage renders it susceptible to rapid metabolism by blood and tissue esterases. Thus it was hypothesized that remifentanil elimination would be independent of renal function. Because its principal metabolite (GR90291) is eliminated renally, it would depend on renal function. This study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil and its metabolite in persons with and without renal failure.

Methods: Two groups of volunteers received two-stage infusions of remifentanil: low dose with 0.0125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.025 micro gram kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h; and high dose with 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 1 h followed by 0.05 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 for 3 h. Blood samples were collected for analysis of remifentanil and GR90291 concentrations. The pharmacokinetics of remifentanil were fit using a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Remifentanil's effect was determined intermittently using minute ventilation during a hypercapnic (7.5% CO2) challenge.

Results: Fifteen patients with renal failure and eight control participants were enrolled. The clearance and volume of distribution of remifentanil were not different between those with renal failure and the controls. Patients with renal failure showed a marked reduction in the elimination of GR90291; the half-life of the metabolite increased from 1.5 h in the controls to more than 26 h in patients with renal failure. The steady-state concentration of GR90291 is likely to be more than 25 times higher in persons with renal failure. There were no obvious differences in opioid effects on minute ventilation in the controls and in patients with renal failure.     

A Comparison of Remifentanil and Morphine Sulfate for Acute Postoperative Analgesia after Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol

Background: The transition from remifentanil intraoperative anesthesia to postoperative analgesia must be planned carefully due to the short duration of action (3-10 min) of remifentanil hydrochloride, a potent, esterase-metabolized micro-opioid agonist. This study compared the efficacy and safety of transition regimens using remifentanil or morphine sulfate for immediate postoperative pain relief in patients who had surgery under general anesthesia with remifentanil/propofol.

Methods: One hundred fifty patients who had received open-label remifentanil and propofol for intraoperative anesthesia participated in this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study and were randomly assigned to either the remifentanil (R) group or the morphine sulfate (M) group. Twenty minutes before the anticipated end of surgery, the propofol infusion was decreased by 50%, and patients received either a placebo bolus (R group) or a bolus of 0.15 mg/kg morphine (M group). At the end of surgery, the propofol and remifentanil maintenance infusions were discontinued and the analgesic infusion was started: either 0.1 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 remifentanil (R group) or placebo analgesic infusion (M group). During the 25 min after tracheal extubation, remifentanil titrations in increments of 0.025 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 and placebo boluses (R group), or 2 mg intravenous morphine boluses and placebo rate increases (M group) were administered as necessary at 5-min intervals to control pain. Patients received the 0.075 mg/kg intravenous morphine bolus (R group) or placebo (M group) at 25 and 30 min after extubation, and the analgesic infusion was discontinued at 35 min. From 35 to 65 minutes after extubation, both groups received 2-6 mg open-label morphine analgesia every 5 min as needed.

Results: Successful analgesia, defined as no or mild pain with adequate respiration (respiratory rate [RR] >or= to 8 breaths/min and pulse oximetry >or= to 90%), was achieved in more patients in the R group than in the M group (58% vs. 33%, respectively) at 25 min after extubation (P < 0.05). The median remifentanil rate for successful analgesia was 0.125 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 (range, 0.05-0.23 micro gram [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1), and the median number of 2-mg morphine boluses used was 2 (range, 0-5 boluses). At 35 min after extubation, >or= to 74% of patients in both groups experienced moderate to severe pain. Median recovery times from the end of surgery were similar between groups. Transient respiratory depression, apnea, or both were the most frequent adverse events (14% for the R group vs. 6% for the M group; P > 0.05).     

Intravenous Remifentanil: Placental Transfer, Maternal and Neonatal Effects

Background: Remifentanil has not been studied in obstetric patients. This study evaluates the placental transfer of remifentanil and the neonatal effects when administered as an intravenous infusion.

Methods: Nineteen parturients underwent nonemergent cesarean section with epidural anesthesia and received 0.1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 remifentanil intravenously, which was continued until skin closure. Maternal arterial (MA), umbilical arterial (UA), and umbilical venous (UV) blood samples were obtained at delivery for analysis of drug concentrations of remifentanil, its metabolite, and blood gases. Maternal vital signs were monitored continuously, and pain and sedation levels were assessed intermittently. Apgar scores were obtained at 1, 5, 10, and 20 min, and Neonatal and Adaptive Capacity Scores were noted 30 and 60 min after delivery. Parturients and newborns were observed for at least 24 h after surgery for side effects.

Results: The means and SDs of UV:MA and UA:UV ratios for remifentanil were 0.88 +/- 0.78 and 0.29 +/- 0.07, respectively. Mean clearance was 93 ml [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] kg-1. The mean UV:MA and UA:MV ratios for remifentanil acid were 0.56 +/- 0.29 and 1.23 +/- 0.89, respectively. The mean MA (remifentanil acid):MA (remifentanil) ratio was 2.92 +/- 3.65. There were no adverse effects on the neonates, but there was a sedative effect and respiratory depressant effect on the mothers.     

Effect of Flumazenil on Ventilatory Drive during Sedation with Midazolam and Alfentanil

Background: Patients who receive a combination of a benzodiazepine and an opioid for conscious sedation are at risk for developing respiratory depression. While flumazenil effectively antagonizes the respiratory depression associated with a benzodiazepine alone, its efficacy in the presence of both a benzodiazepine and an opioid has not been established. This study was designed to determine whether flumazenil can reverse benzodiazepine-induced depression of ventilatory drive in the presence of an opioid.

Methods: Twelve healthy volunteers completed this randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Ventilatory responses to carbon dioxide and to isocapnic hypoxia were determined during four treatment phases: (1) baseline, (2) alfentanil infusion; (3) combined midazolam and alfentanil infusions, and (4) combined alfentanil, midazolam, and "study drug" (consisting of either flumazenil or flumazenil vehicle) infusions. Subjects returned 2-6 weeks later to receive the alternate study drug.

Results: Alfentanil decreased the slope of the carbon dioxide response curve from 2.14 +/- 0.40 to 1.43 +/- 0.19 l [dot] min sup -1 [dot] mmHg sup -1 (x +/- SE, P < 0.05), and decreased the minute ventilation at PET CO2 = 50 mmHg (V with dotE 50) from 19.7 +/- 1.2 to 14.8 +/- 0.9 l [dot] min sup -1 (P < 0.05). Midazolam further reduced these variables to 0.87 +/- 0.17 l [dot] min sup -1 [dot] mmHg sup -1 (P < 0.05) and 11.7 +/- 0.8 l [dot] min sup -1 (P <0.05), respectively. With addition of flumazenil, slope and V with dot sub E 50 increased to 1.47 +/- 0.37 l [dot] min sup -1 [dot] mmHg sup -1 (P < 0.05) and 16.4 +/- 2.0 l [dot] min sup -1 (P < 0.05); after placebo, the respective values of 1.02 +/- 0.19 l [dot] min sup -1 [dot] mmHg sup -1 and 12.5 +/- 1.2 l [dot] min sup -1 did not differ significantly from their values during combined alfentanil and midazolam administration. The effect of flumazenil differed significantly from that of placebo (P < 0.05). Both the slope and the displacement of the hypoxic ventilatory response, measured at PET CO2 = 46 +/- 1 mmHg, were affected similarly, with flumazenil showing a significant improvement compared to placebo.     

Effect of Diltiazem on Midazolam and Alfentanil Disposition in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background: Midazolam and alfentanil are desirable anesthetic adjuncts for cardiac anesthesia. They are metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymes. These isozymes are inhibited by concurrent medications, including the calcium channel antagonist diltiazem, which may have an effect on recovery from anesthesia.

Methods: Thirty patients having coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to receive either diltiazem (60 mg orally 2 h before induction of anesthesia and an infusion of 0.1 mg [centered dot] kg sup -1 [centered dot] h sup -1 started at induction and continued for 23 h) or placebo in a double-blind study. Anesthesia was induced with 0.1 mg/kg midazolam, 50 micro gram/kg alfentanil, and 20 to 80 mg propofol and maintained with infusions of 1 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 [centered dot] min sup -1 of both midazolam and alfentanil supplemented with isoflurane. Plasma midazolam and alfentanil concentrations and areas under the plasma concentration-time curves were determined. The terminal half-life and the time for the drug plasma level to decrease 50% after cessation of the infusion (t50) were calculated for midazolam and alfentanil. Separation from mechanical ventilation and tracheal extubation were performed according to the study protocol.

Results: Diltiazem increased the mean concentration-time curves (from end of anesthesia until 23 h) of midazolam by 24% (P < 0.05) and that of alfentanil by 40% (P < 0.05). The mean half-life of midazolam was 43% (P < 0.05) and that of alfentanil was 50% (P < 0.05) longer in patients receiving diltiazem. The mean t50 of alfentanil was 40% longer (P <0.05) in patients receiving diltiazem, but the change in the mean t50 of midazolam (25%) was not statistically significant. In patients receiving diltiazem, tracheal extubation was performed on average 2.5 h later (P = 0.054) than in those receiving placebo.     

The Dose-Response Relation and Cost-effectiveness of Granisetron for the Prophylaxis of Pediatric Postoperative Emesis

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) may delay discharge from hospital after ambulatory surgery. The antiserotonin agents, ondansetron and granisetron, provide effective prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced and postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults, but are expensive. We determined the dose-response relation of granisetron and the financial impact of using this drug in preventing PONV after pediatric outpatient surgery.

Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 97 pediatric outpatients received a placebo or 10 or 40 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 granisetron intravenously during a standardized anesthetic. Episodes of postoperative retching, vomiting, and times to discharge readiness were recorded. A decision analysis tree was used to divide each study group into nine mutually exclusive subgroups, depending on the incidence of PONV, need for rescue therapy, and the side effects of antiemetics. Costs and probabilities were assigned to each subgroup, and the cost-effectiveness ratio was determined by dividing the sum of these weighted costs by the number of patients free from both PONV and antiemetic side effects.

Results: Granisetron (40 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 intravenously) was more effective than a placebo or 10 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 granisetron in decreasing the incidence and frequency of postoperative emesis, both in the ambulatory surgery center and during the first 24 h. Patients receiving 40 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 granisetron also had shorter times to discharge readiness compared with those receiving a placebo. Administering this dose of granisetron to all high-risk patients would cost the ambulatory care center an additional $99 (95% CI, range $89-$112) per emesis-free patient if nursing labor costs are excluded and $101 (95% CI, range $91-$113) if nursing costs are included.     

Dose Comparison of Remifentanil and Alfentanil for Loss of Consciousness

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil, a potent mu agonist opioid with a rapid onset and offset of effect, as a sole induction agent for loss of consciousness (LOC) and compared it with alfentanil.

Methods: Remifentanil and alfentanil were administered intravenously over 2 min in ascending doses (remifentanil 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 15, 20 micro gram/kg; alfentanil 40, 60, 80, 100, 120, 160, 200 micro gram/kg) to unpremedicated healthy patients. Patients were observed for rigidity and LOC for 30 s after the end of infusion. If patients had not lost consciousness, 2 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] min sup -1 thiopental was administered until LOC was achieved. Arterial blood samples, obtained at specified time intervals, were analyzed for remifentanil and alfentanil whole-blood concentration. Blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded at preset time intervals.

Results: Neither drug could reliably produce LOC. With both drugs, there was a dose-dependent decrease in thiopental requirements and a dose-dependent increase in the incidence and severity of rigidity (P <0.05). The median effective dose (ED50) for LOC with remifentanil was 12 micro gram/kg, and for alfentanil it was 176 micro gram/kg. The median effective concentration (EC50; whole-blood concentration) of remifentanil was 53.8 ng/ml and for alfentanil it was 1,012 ng/ml. Minimal hemodynamic changes were observed after either drug was given.     

Differential Modulation of Remifentanil-induced Analgesia and Postinfusion Hyperalgesia by S-Ketamine and Clonidine in Humans

Background: Experimental studies and clinical observations suggest a possible role for opioids to induce pain and hyperalgesia on withdrawal. The authors used a new experimental pain model in human skin to determine the time course of analgesic and hyperalgesic effects of the [mu]-receptor agonist remifentanil alone or in combination with the N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist S-ketamine or the [alpha]2-receptor agonist clonidine.

Methods: Thirteen volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation at a high current density (2 Hz, 67.3 +/- 16.8 mA, mean +/- SD) induced acute pain (numerical 11-point rating scale: 5-6 out of 10) and stable areas of mechanical hyperalgesia to punctate stimuli and touch (allodynia). The magnitude of pain and area of hyperalgesia were assessed before, during, and after drug infusion (remifentanil at 0.1 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 and S-ketamine at 5 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1 over a period of 30 min, respectively; clonidine infusion at 2 [mu]g/kg for 5 min).

Results: Remifentanil reduced pain and areas of punctate hyperalgesia during infusion. In contrast, postinfusion pain and hyperalgesia were significantly higher than control. During infusion of S-ketamine, pain and hyperalgesia decreased and gradually normalized after infusion. When given in combination, S-ketamine abolished postinfusion increase of punctate hyperalgesia but did not reduce increased pain ratings. Clonidine alone did not significantly attenuate pain or areas of hyperalgesia. However, when given in combination with remifentanil, clonidine attenuated postinfusion increase of pain ratings.     

Intraoperative Remifentanil Infusion Does Not Increase Postoperative Opioid Consumption Compared with 70% Nitrous Oxide

Background: Remifentanil is commonly used to replace nitrous oxide in general anesthesia to avoid the side effects of the latter. However, there are reports that intraoperative remifentanil infusion can lead to acute opioid tolerance. In this study, the authors tried to determine the dose of remifentanil comparable in efficacy to 70% nitrous oxide and to evaluate its effect on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after colorectal surgery using isoflurane anesthesia.

Methods: Sixty adult patients undergoing open colorectal surgery were randomly assigned to receive either remifentanil or 70% nitrous oxide along with isoflurane anesthesia. After morphine analgesia titration in the postanesthesia care unit, patient-controlled analgesia was commenced. Morphine consumption and pain were scored at rest and during cough or movement for 24 h.

Results: The mean remifentanil infusion rate was 0.17 [mu]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1. The median visual analog pain score on arrival in the postanesthesia care unit was 1 (0-10) in the nitrous oxide group and 3 (0-9) in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). Otherwise, there was no difference in pain scores at 5, 10, and 15 min and no difference in the total morphine consumption during the stay in the postanesthesia care unit. The two groups had similar total morphine consumption in the first 24 h and pain scores at rest and during movement. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was 10% in both groups. There was no difference in the sedation scores.     

Cerebral Blood Flow and CO2 Reactivity Is Similar during Remifentanil/N2 O and Fentanyl/N2 O Anesthesia

Background: Remifentanil, a rapidly metabolized [micro sign]-opioid agonist, may offer advantages for neurosurgical procedures in which prolonged anesthetic effects can delay assessment of the patient. This study compared the effects of remifentanil-nitrous oxide on cerebral blood flow (CBF) and carbon dioxide reactivity with those of fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia during craniotomy.

Methods: After institutional approval and informed patient consent were obtained, 23 patients scheduled to undergo supratentorial tumor surgery were randomly assigned to remifentanil or fentanyl infusion groups in a double-blinded manner. Midazolam, thiopental, and pancuronium induction was followed by equipotent narcotic loading infusions of remifentanil (1 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) or fentanyl (2 [micro sign]g [middle dot] kg-1 [middle dot] min-1) for 5-10 min. Patients were ventilated with 2:1 nitrous oxide-oxygen, and opioid rates were reduced and then titrated to a stable hemodynamic effect. After dural exposure, CBF was measured by the intravenous133 xenon technique at normocapnia and hypocapnia. Reactivity of CBF to carbon dioxide was calculated as the absolute increase in CBF per millimeters of mercury increase in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2). Data were analyzed by repeated-measures analysis of variance, unpaired Student's t tests, or contingency analysis.

Results: In the remifentanil group (n = 10), CBF decreased from 36 +/- 11 to 27 +/- 8 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 as PaCO2 decreased from 33 +/- 5 to 25 +/- 2 mmHg. In the fentanyl group (n = 8), CBF decreased from 37 +/- 11 to 25 +/- 6 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 as PaCO2 decreased from 34 +/- 3 to 25 +/- 3 mmHg. Absolute carbon dioxide reactivity was preserved with both agents: 1 +/- 1.2 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for remifentanil and 1.5 +/- 0.5 ml [middle dot] 100 g-1 [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 for fentanyl (P = 0.318).     

Influence of Age and Gender on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remifentanil: I. Model Development

Background: Previous studies have reported conflicting results concerning the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the new short-acting opioid remifentanil.

Methods: Sixty-five healthy adults (38 men and 27 women) ages 20 to 85 y received remifentanil by constant-rate infusion of 1 to 8 micro gram [centered dot] kg sup -1 [centered dot] min sup -1 for 4 to 20 min. Frequent arterial blood samples were drawn and assayed for remifentanil concentration. The electroencephalogram was used as a measure of drug effect. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling was performed using the software package NONMEM. The influence of volunteer covariates were analyzed using a generalized additive model. The performances of the simple (without covariates) and complex (with covariates) models were evaluated prospectively in an additional 15 healthy participants ages 41 to 84 y.

Results: The parameters for the simple three-compartment pharmacokinetic model were V1 = 4.98 l, V2 = 9.01 l, V3 = 6.54 l, Cl1 = 2.46 l/min, Cl2 = 1.69 l/min, and Cl3 = 0.065 l/min. Age and lean body mass were significant covariates. From the ages of 20 to 85 y, V1 and Cl1 decreased by approximately 25% and 33%, respectively. The parameters for the simple sigmoid Emax pharmacodynamic model were ke0 = 0.516 min sup -1, E0 = 20 Hz, Emax = 5.62 Hz, EC50 = 11.2 ng/ml, and gamma = 2.51. Age was a significant covariate of EC50 and ke0, with both decreasing by approximately 50% for the age range studied. The complex pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model performed better than did the simple model when applied prospectively.     

Analgesia and sedation in the subarachnoid anesthesia technique: comparative study between remifentanil and fentanyl/midazolam]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of remifentanil in comparison with fentanyl-midazolam for analgesia and sedation during subarachnoid anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty ASA I-III patients between 25 and 75 years old and scheduled for inguinal hernia repair were enrolled. Before the subarachnoid block, the patients were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of 0.1 microgram.Kg-1.min.-1 of remifentanil (group R) or 1 microgram.Kg-1 of fentanyl and 0.02 mg.Kg-1 of midazolam (group F). Ten minutes later a subarachnoid block to L3-L4 was performed with 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine. We recorded intensity of pain during performance of the block on a simple verbal scale, the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S), hemodynamic variables, respiratory frequency and SpO2, level of comfort and side effects. RESULTS: Over 70% of patients had no pain or slight pain during the subarachnoid puncture and absence of pain was significantly greater in group R than in group F (37% vs. 16%, p < 0.05). Sedation was adequate during surgery in both groups (OAA/S 2-3). There were no differences in level of comfort between the two groups. The incidences of hypoxemia, hypoventilation and excessive sedation were significantly higher in group R (40%, 20% and 16%, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil is more effective for treating pain associated with a subarachnoid block and provides cardiovascular stability with a limited level of sedation per dose, but its use is associated with a high incidence of respiratory depression.     

Epidural Anesthesia and Acutely Increased Intracranial Pressure: Lumbar Epidural Space Hydrodynamics in a Porcine Model

Background: The effects of epidural injection on intracranial pressure (ICP), lumbar epidural pressure, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and spinal cord blood flow (SCBF) were studied after acutely increased ICP in swine.

Methods: Twenty pigs, anesthetized with isoflurane and mechanically ventilated to maintain normocarbia, had two Tuohy needles placed in the lumbar epidural space. The ICP, lumbar epidural pressure, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and central venous pressure were monitored. All animals had a Fogarty catheter placed in the parietal epidural space. Six pigs were randomized to a normal ICP group (group N) and eight pigs to an increased ICP group by inflation of the Fogarty catheter balloon (group R). Each pig had 0.33 ml [centered dot] kg sup -1 of 2.0% carbonated lidocaine injected over 20 s via an epidural needle placed at L3. The ICP and lumbar epidural pressure were then monitored continuously for 30 min. Pressure-time data were fit to traditional compartmental models. Epidural elastance and resistance were calculated using a derivation of the Windkessel theory. An additional six pigs had ICP elevated as in group R and CBF and SCBF measured using radioactive microspheres at five time periods: baseline, 0-60 s, 100-160 s, 200-260 s, and at 30 min after epidural injection.

Results: The animals did not differ with respect to heart rate, central venous pressure, or mean arterial pressure at baseline. The ICP was 10 +/- 2 mmHg in group N, and 24 +/- 2 mmHg after balloon inflation in group R. After epidural injection, peak ICP was significantly greater in group R (76 +/- 22 vs. 54 +/- 17 mmHg) but not different by 30 min (17 +/- 5 vs. 11 +/- 1 mmHg). Epidural elastance in group N was 8.3 +/- 3.1 mmHg [centered dot] ml sup -1 and 12.8 +/- 3.0 mmHg [centered dot] ml sup -1 in group R (P = 0.045). Epidural resistance was 1,330 +/- 590 mmHg [centered dot] s [centered dot] ml sup -1 in group N and 2,220 +/- 600 mmHg [centered dot] s [centered dot] ml sup -1 in group R (P = 0.038). The CBF and SCBF were less than 10% of baseline during the 0- to 60-s time period after epidural injection. Thereafter, CBF and SCBF did not differ from baseline values.     

A comparison of four intravenous sedation techniques and Bispectral Index monitoring in sinonasal surgery

This study was performed to investigate the quality of different intravenous sedation techniques, and the correlation between the Bispectral Index (BIS) values and the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scores. Eighty patients undergoing sinonasal surgery were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group MF received midazolam and fentanyl, group PF received propofol and fentanyl, group MR received midazolam and remifentanil, and group PR received propofol and remifentanil. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure values were not different among the groups. SpO2 decreased only after intravenous medication in groups MF and MR (P < 0.017). Emesis was less common with propofol. A positive relationship existed between the BIS values and OAA/S scores during the operation in all groups and the strongest correlation was observed in group PR (r = 0.565 and P < 0.001). In conclusion, these four intravenous sedation techniques did not change mean arterial pressure, heart rate or SpO2 clinically and produced a similar level of light sedation. The BIS was useful for monitoring of sedation during sinonasal surgery under local anaesthesia with intravenous sedation.     

The Pharmacodynamic Effect of a Remifentanil Bolus on Ventilatory Control

Background: In doses typically administered during conscious sedation, remifentanil may be associated with ventilatory depression. However, the time course of ventilatory depression after an initial dose of remifentanil has not been determined previously.

Methods: In eight healthy volunteers, the authors determined the time course of the ventilatory response to carbon dioxide using the dual isohypercapnic technique. Subjects breathed via mask from a to-and-fro circuit with variable carbon dioxide absorption, allowing the authors to maintain end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide (PETCO2) at approximately 46 or 56 mmHg (alternate subjects). After 6 min of equilibration, subjects received 0.5 [mu]g/kg remifentanil over 5 s, and minute ventilation ([latin capital V with dot above]E) was recorded during the next 20 min. Two hours later, the study was repeated using the other carbon dioxide tension (56 or 46 mmHg). The [latin capital V with dot above]E data were used to construct two-point carbon dioxide response curves at 30-s intervals after remifentanil administration. Using published pharmacokinetic values for remifentanil and the method of collapsing hysteresis loops, the authors estimated the effect-site equilibration rate constant (keo), the effect-site concentration producing 50% respiratory depression (EC50), and the shape parameter of the concentration-response curve ([gamma]).

Results: The slope of the carbon dioxide response decreased from 0.99 [95% confidence limits 0.72 to 1.26] to a nadir of 0.27 l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1 [-0.12 to 0.66] 2 min after remifentanil (P < 0.001); within 5 min, it recovered to approximately 0.6l [middle dot] min-1 [middle dot] mmHg-1, and within 15 min of injection, slope returned to baseline. The computed ventilation at PET = 50 mmHg ([latin capital V with dot above]E50) decreased from 12.9 [9.8 to 15.9] to 6.1 l/min [4.8 to 7.4] 2.5 min after remifentanil injection (P < 0.001). This was caused primarily by a decrease in tidal volume rather than in respiratory rate. Estimated pharmacodynamic parameters based on computed mean values of [latin capital V with dot above]E50 included keo = 0.24 min-1 (T1/2 = 2.9 min), EC50 = 1.12 ng/ml, and [gamma] = 1.74.     

Remifentanil versus morphine analgesia and sedation for mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a randomized double blind study

BACKGROUND: The rapid onset and offset of action of remifentanil could make it quickly adjustable to the required level of sedation in critically ill patients. The authors hypothesized that the efficacy of a remifentanil-based regimen was greater than that of a morphine-based regimen. METHODS: Forty intent-to-treat patients were randomly allocated to receive a blinded infusion of either remifentanil 0.15 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) or morphine 0.75 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). The opioid infusion was titrated, in the first intent, to achieve optimal sedation defined as Sedation Agitation scale of 4. A midazolam open-label infusion was started if additional sedation was required. RESULTS: The mean percentage hours of optimal sedation was significantly longer in the remifentanil group (78.3 +/- 6.2) than in the morphine group (66.5 +/- 8.5). This was achieved with less frequent infusion rate adjustments (0.34 +/- 0.25 changes/h) than in the morphine group (0.42 +/- 0.22 changes/h). The mean duration of mechanical ventilation and extubation time were significantly longer in the morphine group (18.1 +/- 3.4 h, 73 +/- 7 min) than in the remifentanil group (14.1 +/- 2.8 h, 17 +/- 6 min), respectively. Remifentanil mean infusion rate was 0.13 +/- 0.03 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), whereas morphine mean infusion rate was 0.68 +/- 0.28 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). More subjects in the morphine group (9 of 20) than in the remifentanil group (6 of 20) required midazolam. The incidence of adverse events was low and comparable across the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: A remifentanil-based regimen was more effective in the provision of optimal analgesia-sedation than a standard morphine-based regimen. The remifentanil-based regimen allowed a more rapid emergence from sedation and facilitated earlier extubation.     

Remifentanil versus propofol sedation for peribulbar anesthesia

The short onset and offset of remifentanil may allow for accurate dosing of sedative effect with few side-effects and rapid recovery. In this study, remifentanil is compared with propofol for sedation intraocular pressure hemodynamics and oxygen saturation, in patients undergoing cataract surgery with peribulbar block. After ethical committee approval, fifty patients scheduled for one eye cataract surgery were enrolled into the prospective study. Remifentanil infusion was initialized at a rate of 0.04 microg/kg/min, 10 min before peribulbar anesthesia in Remifentanil group (Group R). In Propofol Group (Group P), propofol infusion of 2 mg/kg/h was reduced to 1mg/kg/h. Intraocular pressures of the contralateral eye were measured before and after peribulbar anesthesia and at the end of the operation. Sedation scores (1-5), hemodynamic parameters and saturation were assessed at 5 minute intervals. Heart rate, intraocular pressure, saturation and sedation scores were similar between groups. Intraocular pressures decreased within time in both groups. There were significant changes in mean blood pressure after 5th min between groups (P < 0.05). The infusion of remifentanil or propofol for sedation provided adequate sedation, hemodynamic stability without increasing intraocular pressure during surgery in patients undergoing cataract surgery with peribulbar anesthesia.