A survey of primary care physicians' perceptions of their patients' use of complementary medicine

PURPOSE: To study the perceptions and attitudes of primary care physicians concerning their patients' use of complementary medicine. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to all 165 primary care physicians attending a routine continuing-medicine education program. Items included physicians' estimated rates of patient utilization of complementary medicine or herbal remedies and of patient reportage of such use; physicians' knowledge about side effects and interactions of herbal remedies; and frequency with which physicians questioned their patients on the use of complementary medicine and herbal remedies. RESULTS: The compliance rate was 90.0% (n=150). Sixty-eight percent of physicians estimated that up to 15% of their patients use complementary medicine; 58% always or often asked their patients about it; 50% estimated that 10% of patients report use of complementary medicine, and 60% estimated the same rate for herbal remedies; 51% believed that herbal remedies have no or only mild side effects; more than 70% claimed that they had little or no knowledge about what herbal remedies are; 24% never referred patients for complementary medicine, and 69% did so occasionally. Twenty-five percent had some training in complementary medicine, and 31% practiced some kind of complementary medicine. Most of the physicians believed that people turn to alternative methods when they are dissatisfied with conventional medicine. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians underestimate the rate of complementary medicine use by patients, suggesting that many patients do not report such use to their physician. Since alternative treatments are potentially harmful and may interact with conventional medications, physicians should be encouraged to communicate with patients about complementary medicine in general and herbal remedies in particular, and they should regularly include questions about their use when taking histories. They should also inform themselves about risks of alternative treatments particularly with herbal remedies, and have access to appropriate information systems.     

Medical students' attitudes about complementary and alternative medicine

OBJECTIVE: To compare the attitudes about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) of medical students from two different medical schools and at different stages of their medical training (first and third years). DESIGN: Four-group, cross-sectional, self-administered survey study. SETTINGS AND SUBJECTS: Three hundred and eleven (311) students from two British medical schools (Newcastle and London). OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported knowledge of, attitudes about, and beliefs about CAM. RESULTS: Third-year students thought CAM overall was less effective than first-year students and also were significantly less interested in training in CAM techniques. The 43 attitude statements factored into six interpretable factors. A medical school x year ANOVA on the factor scores showed many results consistent with the first part of the study. First-year students seemed more eager to be taught CAM than third-year students, and students at Newcastle were more positive about CAM than those at University College London. CONCLUSIONS: Education at medical school does influence attitudes to CAM. As their orthodox medical training proceeds, medical students seem to increase their skepticism about CAM.     

First year medical students' perceptions and use of complementary and alternative medicine

OBJECTIVES: To explore First Year medical students' rating of CAM therapies following a core teaching session. To determine the influence of student gender and previous experience of CAM and therapist/teacher gender and professional background on ratings. DESIGN: Survey; self-administered questionnaire following a teaching session. SETTING: First Year medical students Behavioural Science module CAM teaching session, University of Birmingham Medical School, UK. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty (71.0%) students completed a questionnaire. 56 (37.3%) students had previous experience of CAM, particularly where a family member already used it (P = < 0.001). Aromatherapy (29/56, 51.7%) and homoeopathy (17/56, 30.3%) were the most common therapies listed. Females were more likely than males to have used aromatherapy (P = 0.038) or reflexology (P = 0.007). Students using aromatherapy were more likely to have self treated (P = 0.01). Of 82 episodes of CAM use, most (67/82,81.7%) were stated to have been helpful. Hypnotherapy (P = 0.003) and aromatherapy (P = 0.015) were most helpful. Following the teaching session students rated therapies observed on a 10 point scale, 1 (extremely sceptical) to 10 (totally convinced). All were rated above the mid-point; highest rated was chiropractic (median score = 8), lowest, reflexology (median score = 5.06). Students who had previously used hypnotherapy gave it higher scores (P = 0.018). Students whose family used CAM were more likely to rate aromatherapy highly (P = .027) and to give homoeopathy a low score (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A short CAM teaching session early in the curriculum can inform students about the relationship of CAM with current medical practice. It can be used as a 'taster' prior to selection of Special Study Module choices in later years.     

Attitudes toward integration of complementary and alternative medicine with hospital-based care

OBJECTIVE: To characterize those who have used, expect to use, or are opposed to the use of holistic therapies, especially in a conventional medical (hospital) setting. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION AND METHODS: Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of Hamilton-Wentworth residents between March and June 1998 (n = 416; response rate, 63%); analysis used logistic regression. RESULTS: Thirty-seven percent (37%) used at least one holistic therapy in the previous year: the three most common were chiropractic, massage, and herbal/phytology. The three most common reasons for use were general health, fatigue, and arthritis. Thirty-three percent (33%) would use holistic therapy in the future. Barriers to use were lack of information, perceived ineffectiveness, and cost; approximately 40% agreed they would only use holistic therapies with medical advice. Approximately 13% were opposed to holistic therapy and objected to its use in hospitals. Younger age, preference for holistic therapy over conventional medicine, and prior use of holism independently predicted high likelihood for future use. Lower income and high self-perceived health were associated with negative attitude toward use of holistic therapies in hospital. CONCLUSION: Most respondents would accept integration of holistic techniques into a hospital; therapies would be more acceptable if there were clear evidence of their efficacy. A few might find their opinion of a sponsoring hospital lowered by such integration.     

Problem-solving and decision-making preferences: no difference between complementary and alternative medicine users and non-users

The objective of this study was to determine if complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) Users are more autonomous than Non-Users with respect to their preferred role in decision-making (measured by the problem-solving decision-making or PSDM scale). A survey was mailed in spring 2001 to a random sample of 696 men (selected from the Ontario Cancer Registry), aged 18 years or older and diagnosed with prostate cancer in the preceding 2 years. Less than 5% of the 489 (72.1% response rate) men (mean age 68.6 years) who responded to the PSDM question in our survey were classified as having an autonomous role preference, while almost 1/3 of the respondents reported using CAM for their prostate cancer. The majority of respondents were classified as preferring a shared role and a substantial minority was classified as preferring a passive role. There was no statistically significant difference between CAM users and non-users with respect to their preferred role. The hypothesis that CAM Users are more autonomous problem solvers and decision makers is not supported by these findings; however, the generalizability of our results is limited by the fact that we surveyed a relatively older male population only.     

Sex differences in patients' and physicians' communication during primary care medical visits

This study reports on the analysis of audiotapes of 537 adult, chronic disease patients and their 127 physicians (101 men and 26 women) in a variety of primary care practice settings to explore differences attributable to the effects of the patient's and the physician's sex on the process of communication during medical visits. Compared to male physicians, women conducted longer medical visits (22.9 vs 20.3 minutes; F(1,515) = 7.9, P less than .005), with substantially more talk F(1,518) = 19.5, P less than .000. Differences were especially evident during the history segment of the visit when female physicians talked 40% more than male physicians (F(1,518) = 20.1, P less than .000) and when patients of female physicians talked 58% more than male physicians' patients (F(1,448) = 24.4, P less than .000). Compared to male physicians, female physicians engaged in more positive talk, partnership-building, question-asking, and information-giving. Similarly, when with female compared to male physicians, patients engaged in more positive talk, more partnership-building, question-asking, and information-giving related to both biomedical and psychosocial topics.     

Women's perceptions and beliefs about the use of complementary and alternative medicines during menopause

INTRODUCTION: Studies of menopausal women are providing increasing evidence of the reasons for complementary and alternative medications (CAM) use during menopause, the types of CAM used and the prevalence of use; however, further insight into the experiences of women using CAM during menopause is required. The aim of this study was to put CAM use during menopause into context by identifying and describing the factors that influence menopausal women in their decision to use CAM. METHODS: Menopausal women participated in focus groups and telephone interviews and the following information were collected: symptoms experienced during menopause; therapies (other than hormones) used to cope with menopause, and the perceived benefits of these therapies, and how the women found out about these therapies. The data collected were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen women participated in the study; 13 in the focus groups and two in telephone interviews. The women reported using a diverse range of therapies, supplements and activities. Empowerment was a central theme throughout the study. The level of support from the women's general practitioners was reported to be a major influence in their decision to take CAM. The availability of information about CAM and individual determinants, such as symptoms and perceptions of menopause, were also identified as significant influences. CONCLUSION: The women in this study expressed a desire to have control over their symptoms and the way in which their menopause was treated. This study has highlighted a need for more information and education about menopause and, in particular, the range, safety and efficacy of CAM use during menopause. The study also shows there is a need for strong participatory relationships between women and their health professionals.     

(Using) complementary and alternative medicine: the perceptions of palliative patients with cancer

Use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly common within Western societies, including Australia. This parallels calls for or claims of integration of CAM into mainstream medical practice, with oncology and palliative care specifically nominated as appropriate arenas for integration. However, there is an absence of studies examining patient perceptions of both CAM and CAM users. In this study, 28 adult patients with cancer close to death were interviewed regarding treatment decisions at the end of life, including decisions about CAM. Thematic analysis of transcribed interviews found consistent differences in talk around CAM between 12 users and 16 nonusers of CAM, primarily related to the perceived value of these treatments. Drawing upon a mind-body discourse that holds individuals responsible for their health, users valued CAM for the perceived benefit to physical or psychological well-being and compatibility with a holistic approach to health care, deemed to complement or augment conventional medicine. However, some were self-critical of their failure to continue with CAM, despite practical and financial difficulties experienced. Nonusers devalued CAM as unable to cure their disease (but did not similarly devalue conventional medicine), and negatively construed CAM users as desperate, or as challenging medical wisdom. Despite increased legitimation and medicalization of CAM, patients assess CAM differently to allopathic medicine, with different (positive and negative) assessments attributable to users. The misperception by many (nonusers) that CAM are intended to cure and available negative moral and social judgments centred around CAM use may deter patient uptake of CAM in areas where they have proven efficacy in symptom control.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients suffering from primary headache disorders

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is increasingly common in the treatment of primary headache disorders despite lack of evidence for efficacy in most modalities. A systematic questionnaire-based survey of CAM therapy was conducted in 432 patients who attended seven tertiary headache out-patient clinics in Germany and Austria. Use of CAM was reported by the majority (81.7%) of patients. Most frequently used CAM treatments were acupuncture (58.3%), massage (46.1%) and relaxation techniques (42.4%). Use was motivated by 'to leave nothing undone' (63.7%) and 'to be active against the disease' (55.6%). Compared with non-users, CAM users were of higher age, showed a longer duration of disease, a higher percentage of chronification, less intensity of headache, were more satisfied with conventional prophylaxis and showed greater willingness to gather information about headaches. There were no differences with respect to gender, headache diagnoses, headache-specific disability, education, income, religious attitudes or satisfaction with conventional attack therapy. A higher number of headache days, longer duration of headache treatment, higher personal costs, and use of CAM for other diseases predicted a higher number of used CAM treatments. This study confirms that CAM is widely used among primary headache patients, mostly in combination with standard care.     

Patients' perceptions of barriers for participation in nursing care

Scand J Caring Sci; 2011; 25; 575–582
Patients’ perceptions of barriers for participation in nursing care Background: In many Western countries as in Sweden, patients have legal right to participate in own care individually adjusted to each patient’s wishes and abilities. There are still few empirical studies of patients’ perceptions of barriers for participation. Accordingly, there is a need to identify what may prevent patients from playing an active role in own nursing care. Such knowledge is highly valuable for the nursing profession when it comes to implementation of individual patient participation. Aim and objective: To explore barriers for patient participation in nursing care with a special focus on adult patients with experience of inpatient physical care. Methodological design and justification: Data were collected through 6 focus groups with 26 Swedish informants recruited from physical inpatient care as well as discharged patients from such a setting. A content analysis with qualitative approach of the tape‐recorded interview material was made. Ethical issues and approval: The ethics of scientific work was adhered to. Each study participant gave informed consent after verbal and written information. The Ethics Committee of Göteborg University approved the study. Results: The barriers for patient participation were identified as four categories: Facing own inability, meeting lack of empathy, meeting a paternalistic attitude and sensing structural barriers, and their 10 underlying subcategories. Conclusions: Our study contributes knowledge and understanding of patients’ experiences of barriers for participation. The findings point to remaining structures and nurse attitudes that are of disadvantage for patients’ participation. The findings may increase the understanding of patient participation and may serve as an incentive in practice and nursing education to meet and eliminate these barriers, in quality assurance of care, work organization and further research.     

The psychology of complementary and alternative medicine

This paper attempts to answer the question: What accounts for the universal rise in interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), the growth of practitioners and potential patients seeking them out? It is recognised that there is great diversity both within CAM (in terms of philosophy, methodology, research) as well as between CAM and orthodox medicine. The limited empirical research concerning why people choose a CAM practitioner is reviewed. Six major reasons are given to answer the above question recognising their relationships to one another and that other reasons do exist. There is no typical patient, although the results do suggest that certain individuals based on their demography, medical history and belief system are most likely to choose CAM.     

Use of complementary and alternative medicine by pediatric oncology patients during palliative care

Purpose

Although the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has risen in the last decade, information about its use by pediatric patients in palliative care is still scarce. The purpose of the study was to assess the frequency and types of CAM administered by parents with children suffering from cancer during the palliative phase.

Methods

All parents who lost their child due to cancer in the federal state North Rhine Westfalia/Germany were eligible for the study. The first group of eligible parents was contacted in 1999–2000 and a second group of parents in 2005–2006. Upon agreement, parents were asked to complete a semi-structured questionnaire about the frequency of CAM use and the specific treatments that had been used. The types of CAM were categorized according to the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM).

Results

A total of 96 parents participated in the study (48 in each cohort). Forty-three percent of all parents in both groups reported CAM use. The results show an increase of CAM use from 38 % in the first group to 49 % in the second cohort of pediatric patients during palliative care. The most common types of CAM used in both groups were homeopathy and treatment with mistletoe preparations.

Conclusions

The study provides information about usage of CAM in children suffering from cancer during the palliative phase of the disease. Further research is required to investigate benefits, potential adverse effects, and the potential efficacy of CAM in this population.

     

What to say when your patients ask you about complementary and alternative medicine

There is an increasing interest in the variety of healers and treatments considered as complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Care managers often encourage patients to take an active role in their self-care. The approach to self-care may include CAM. Care managers need to understand CAM and help patients become educated consumers in order to enhance their health and quality of life.