Effect of androgen deprivation therapy on bone mineral density in prostate cancer patients

Aim: To evaluate the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on bone mineral density (BMD) in prostate cancer patients. Methods: Forty-nine prostate cancer patients with their BMD determined were divided into two groups: the non-treated group included 21 patients before the commencement of ADT and the treated group, 28 patients, who had received ADT for more than 1 year. BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in the lumbar spine (L2-4) and femoral neck. Results: Thirteen (62 %) non-treated and 23 (82 %) treated patients fulfilled the BMD criteria for osteopenia or osteoporosis. Z scores for age-matched control in lumbar spine and femoral neck were -0.9 ± 0.7 and -0.6 ± 0.5, respectively, in the treated group, and -1.8 ± 1.1 and-1.6 ± 1.0 , respectively, in the non-treated group, the differences between the two groups were highly significant (P<0.01). Conclusion: Prostate cancer patients who received ADT for more than 1 year had a significantly lower BMD in the lumbar spine a     

Germline CAG repeat length of the androgen receptor and time to progression in patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy

Study Type – Prognosis (retrospective cohort) Level of Evidence 2b What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Germline CAG repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor (AR‐CAG) have been shown to influence the activity of the androgen receptor, but there has been conflicting data from small retrospective studies evaluating the effect of CAG repeat polymorphisms on response to ADT. This is the largest published study to date investigating the association of germline AR‐CAG repeat lengths and efficacy of ADT in prostate cancer. Germline AR‐CAG repeat lengths do not predict response to ADT.

OBJECTIVES

? Germline CAG repeat polymorphisms in the androgen receptor (AR‐CAG) have been shown to influence the activity of the AR. ? The purpose of the present study was to determine if AR‐CAG repeat length correlates with time to progression on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? Germline AR‐CAG repeat lengths were determined in a cohort of 480 patients with recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer treated at a single tertiary care institution and correlated to time to progression (TTP) and overall survival.

RESULTS

? There was no significant correlation between differences in the AR‐CAG repeat lengths and TTP or overall survival in patients with prostate cancer receiving ADT. ? AR‐CAG repeat lengths did not significantly correlate with age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score or clinical stage at diagnosis. ? In patients with metastatic disease, longer AR‐CAG repeat lengths (>23 vs ≤23) were associated with a longer TTP on ADT, but this finding was of borderline significance (median TTP 18.3 vs 15.5 months, P= 0.09; adjusted HR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval = 0.54–1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

? This is the largest published study to date investigating the association of germline AR‐CAG repeat lengths and efficacy of ADT in prostate cancer. ? Germline AR‐CAG repeat lengths do not predict response to ADT.     

Use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: indications and prevalence

Androgens play a prominent role in the development, maintenance and progression of prostate cancer. The introduction of androgen deprivation therapies into the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer patients has resulted in a wide variety of benefits ranging from a survival advantage for those with clinically localized or locally advanced disease, to improvements in symptom control for patients with advanced disease. Controversies remain, however, surrounding the optimal timing, duration and schedule of these hormonal approaches. Newer hormonal manipulations such as abiraterone acetate have also been investigated and will broaden treatment options for men with prostate cancer. This review highlights the various androgen-directed treatment options available to men with prostate cancer, their specific indications and the evidence supporting each approach, as well as patterns of use of hormonal therapies.     

Increased risk of a herpes zoster attack in patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

This study aimed to examine the association of herpes zoster (HZ) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) use among patients with prostate cancer (PC), using a population‐based data set. The study sample for this study was retrieved from the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2005. We selected 877 patients with PC who had received ADT as the study group, while 849 patients with PC who had not received ADT served as the comparison group. Each study patient was individually tracked for a 3‐year period to discriminate those who subsequently received a diagnosis of HZ. Of the total 1,726 sampled patients, the incidence rate of HZ per 100 person‐years was 1.80 (95% CI: 1.41–2.25) during the 3‐year follow‐up period. In particular, incidence rates of HZ per 100 person‐years were 2.36 (95% CI: 1.75–3.13) and 1.24 (95% CI: 0.81–1.81), respectively, for patients with PC who had and those who had not received ADT. Furthermore, Cox proportional hazard regressions showed that the adjusted hazard ratio for an HZ attack during the 3‐year follow‐up period for patients with PC who had received ADT was 1.88 (95% CI: 1.13–3.11) than those who had not received ADT. We concluded that patients with PC who had received ADT had an increased risk of HZ.     

Metabolic and cardiovascular effects of androgen deprivation therapy

Prostate cancer is the most common gender-specific malignancy in men in the USA. Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is commonly used in the treatment of metastatic or recurrent prostate cancer. The use of ADT is increasing with the advocacy of adjuvant and neoadjuvant ADT for treating asymptomatic patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Although the use of ADT has resulted in improved survival in men with advanced prostate cancer, ADT, with its resulting severe hypogonadism, causes profound metabolic side-effects. We comprehensively reviewed previous reports using Medline searches of English-language literature (1950 to the present), with the keywords 'hypogonadism', 'testosterone', 'androgen deprivation therapy', 'hormonal treatment', 'prostate cancer', 'diabetes', 'metabolic syndrome', and 'cardiovascular disease'. Men with prostate cancer who undergo long-term ADT are at greater risk of developing dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, hyperglycaemia and metabolic syndrome. These metabolic and physiological changes are a direct result of the induced severe hypogonadism and might predispose patients to a greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. There is a need for prospective studies aimed and designed to investigate the metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects of ADT, and assess the benefit/risk ratio, especially in special populations such as diabetics.     

Use of androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer in older men

OBJECTIVE

To assess factors associated with early or delayed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) among men diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer, and to assess the relationship between ADT and overall survival, as there is uncertainty about the ideal timing for initiating ADT in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied a population‐based cohort of American men aged ≥66 years diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer during 1992–2002 and followed to 2003. We assessed the receipt of ADT early (≤4 months from diagnosis), delayed (>4 months), or not at all, using multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with treatment, and Cox proportional‐hazard models to assess whether treatment was associated with survival.

RESULTS

Overall, 69.5% of men received early ADT and 7.3% delayed. Adjusted rates of early ADT were lower for black than white men (58.3% vs 71.0%), and of delayed ADT were higher for black than white men (12.7% vs 6.2%). Receipt of ADT was associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.66–0.73). The benefit of early treatment did not differ from delayed treatment (P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

A large minority of men with metastatic prostate cancer, particularly black men, receive delayed or no ADT. Early or delayed ADT was associated with similarly prolonged survival. After controlling for patient and tumour characteristics, survival did not differ by race, and receipt of ADT did not contribute to racial differences in survival.     

Effect of androgen deprivation therapy on quality of life in Japanese men with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Japanese men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. METHODS: Fifty-six men were enrolled in this study. HRQOL was prospectively measured before ADT, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment began, using a general (36-item Short-Form Health Survey) and disease-specific (the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index) HRQOL questionnaire. RESULTS: In the general HRQOL questionnaire, patients with stage B (n = 22) or C (n = 17) disease showed a decline in vitality at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05 for both). Stage D patients (n = 17) had improvements in bodily pain at 3 and 12 months (P < 0.05 for both), vitality at 12 months (P < 0.05), role-emotional at 6 months (P < 0.05), and mental health at 3 months (P < 0.05). When clinical stages were not considered, there were no significant changes in the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. As for the disease-specific HRQOL, urinary function improved after ADT at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05 for both), and urinary bother decreased at 3 (P < 0.05), 6 (P < 0.005) and 12 months (P < 0.05). Sexual function decreased at 3 (P < 0.05), 6 (P < 0.005) and 12 months (P < 0.005) but sexual bother improved at 6 and 12 months (P < 0.05 for both). If patients were stratified by clinical stages, similar findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: General HRQOL was mostly unaffected by ADT in Japanese men. Disease-specific questions indicated an increase in urinary function. Although deterioration of sexual function was marked, most patients did not report sexual bother. Our results shed new light on the impact of ADT on HRQOL and could provide useful information about patient-centered outcome evaluations.     

Prognostic significance of genetic polymorphisms in disease progression and survival in prostate cancer after androgen deprivation therapy

It is believed that androgens and their receptors regulate normal prostate growth and mediate prostate cancer development. Androgen deprivation therapy is the most commonly used treatment for advanced prostate cancer. Although the therapy is initially effective, progression of the disease to castration-resistant prostate cancer is almost inevitable, leading to treatment failure. Despite the existence of current clinical parameters, new biomarkers are urgently needed to improve the prognosis. Some molecules and DNA-based genetic biomarkers are under investigation as potential prognostic factors. The advancement in molecular cytogenetic research, such as genome-wide association for single-nucleotide polymorphisms, has made possible the detection of genetic mutations. In this study, a literature search from August 1985 to April 2013 was performed through the PubMed database using the keywords “genetic polymorphisms”, “prostate cancer” and “androgen deprivation therapy”. The results revealed that several genome-wide association studies (such as rs16901979, rs7931342, HSD17B4, rs6162 in the CYP17A1, rs4243229 and rs7201637 in the HSD17B2, rs1062577 in the ESR1, SLCO1B3, SLCO2B1, rs2939244 in the ARRDC3, rs9508016 in the FLT1, rs6504145 in the SKAP1, rs7830611 in the FBXO32, rs9508016 in the FLT1, rs12529 in the AKR1C3, rs16934641 in the BNC2, rs3763763 in the TACC2, rs2051778 in the ALPK1, and rs3763763 in the TACC2, AR, ESR1, and ESR2) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in important pathways (such as androgen signal, biosynthesis, metabolism, androgen receptor binding site, response element, androgen receptor CAG repeat polymorphism length, and estrogen receptor-binding sites) involved in prostate cancer occurrence and mechanism could serve as candidate biomarkers for the early detection of castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen deprivation therapy. Additional investigations are required to decipher precisely the gene combinations and personalize the management of prostate cancer.     

Deferred combined androgen blockade therapy using bicalutamide in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer during androgen deprivation monotherapy

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adding bicalutamide on serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) during androgen deprivation monotherapy (ADMT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with HRPC were treated with deferred combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy, administering bicalutamide 80 mg once daily. HRPC was defined biochemically as three consecutive rises in PSA level during ADMT. The treatment response was defined as a > or = 50% decline in PSA levels. Prognostic values of various pretreatment variables for responsiveness to deferred CAB were determined statistically. When the disease relapsed during deferred CAB, bicalutamide was discontinued and the patients were evaluated for the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AWS). RESULTS: Of the 44 patients, 29 (66%) had a PSA response; the median PSA failure-free survival was 9.2+ months. Biopsy Gleason score was the only pretreatment variable predictive of a PSA response (mean Gleason score 7.9 in responders and 8.7 in nonresponders). The PSA doubling time (PSA-DT) was the only statistically significant variable of PSA failure-free survival in a multivariate analysis. The 1- and 2-year PSA failure-free survival rates were 43% and 31% in patients with a PSA-DT of >4 months, while it was 21% and none, respectively, in those with a PSA-DT of <4 months. Responders to deferred CAB had a statistically longer cancer-specific survival than nonresponders. None of 20 patients who were evaluated for AWS had the condition. CONCLUSIONS: Deferred CAB therapy using bicalutamide is effective in patients with progression during ADMT, particularly in those with lower Gleason score tumours or a longer PSA-DT. AWS after deferred CAB is uncommon.     

Frequency of zoledronic acid to prevent further bone loss in osteoporotic patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (RCT)
Level of Evidence 1b

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZA) in osteoporotic patients with prostate cancer receiving either luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone agonists (LHRHA, which accelerate bone loss) or bicalutamide (which preserves bone mineral density, BMD) as androgen‐deprivation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced prostate cancer, and many patients are osteoporotic at presentation, with others becoming so on treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty‐eight osteoporotic men with non‐metastatic prostate cancer were followed for 3 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either LHRHA (29) or bicalutamide (29). All received 4 mg ZA 3‐monthly for 1 year. BMD was measured by dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry at four times: 1 year before ZA; immediately before ZA; after five infusions; and 1 year afterwards. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) were measured at 3‐monthly intervals on ZA and 1 year later. All patients had radiography of the thoracolumbar spine at baseline and after ZA.

RESULTS

Patients on LHRHA showed a 4.9% decrease in BMD before ZA, a 1.6% increase after ZA and a 3.0% decrease 1 year later, compared to 2.0% increase, 7.8% increase and 1.9% decrease, respectively, in those on bicalutamide. BTMs decreased significantly after ZA. Seven patients (12%) had vertebral fractures at baseline, with none deteriorating at 1 year; two (3.5%) developed mandibular osteonecrosis.

CONCLUSION

Before ZA, BMD decreased on LHRHA, but was maintained on bicalutamide. Treatment with 3‐monthly ZA increased BMD and suppressed BTMs in osteoporotic patients both on LHRHA and bicalutamide, but to a greater extent in the latter. However, 1 year after the last infusion, BMD declined, suggesting that annual administration is inadequate in these patients. The optimum frequency might be related to BMD at time of bisphosphonate initiation.     

Radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation: Five-year results

BACKGROUND: The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on the outcomes of prostate cancer patients who received radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy have not yet been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients with stage A(2), B or C prostate cancers were randomized to one of two groups: group I (n = 90), who received androgen deprivation (leuprolide and chlormadinone acetate) for 3 months followed by radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuprolide alone), and group II (n = 86), who underwent the surgery followed by 3-month androgen deprivation (leuprolide and chlormadinone acetate) and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuprolide alone). The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on survival, clinical relapse (serum prostate specific antigen, PSA, above the normal level, local recurrence, or distant metastases), and PSA relapse (PSA above the detectable level) were evaluated at 5 years or later after treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall, cause-specific, clinical relapse-free, or PSA relapse-free survival rates between the two groups. In a subanalysis, no prostate cancer deaths or clinical relapses were noted in 29 patients with organ-confined disease (OCD: negativity of capsular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, surgical margins or nodal involvement). The odds ratio for OCD depending on group assignment was 2.44 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.04-5.72), for group I, demonstrating a higher probability of having OCD. This ratio was increased to 4.00 (95% CI 1.06-15.16) if the analysis was conducted in a subpopulation with prostate specific antigen levels less than 35.6 ng/mL and with clinical stage B or C cancers. CONCLUSION: Preoperative androgen deprivation has no demonstrable benefit in 5-year outcomes for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy. However, it did increase the probability of OCD, which was associated with no clinical relapse during the follow-up. A longer observation is needed to clarify the exact extent of the benefits in terms of survival.     

Impact of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy after radical prostatectomy on the survival of patients with pathological T3b prostate cancer

Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Adjuvant hormonal therapy is known to improve cancer specific survival in prostate cancer patients with lymph node positive disease. This study suggests that surgically treated prostate cancer patients with seminal vesical invasion (pT3b) may have improved cancer specific survival if treated with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy, similar to lymph node positive patients.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b) at radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 12 115 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1987 and 2002 to identify patients with pT3bN0 prostate cancer who received adjuvant ADT (n= 191). These patients were matched by clinical and pathological variables to a group of patients with pT3b prostate cancer who did not receive adjuvant ADT. Median postoperative follow‐up was 10 years. Clinical endpoints included biochemical progression‐free survival (BPFS), local recurrence‐free survival (LRFS), systemic progression‐free survival (SPFS), cancer‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent adjuvant ADT experienced improved 10‐year BPFS (60% vs 16%, P < 0.001), LRFS (87% vs 76%, P= 0.002), SPFS (91% vs 78%, P= 0.004) and CSS (94% vs 87%, P= 0.037). Overall survival was not significantly different between groups (75% vs 69%, P= 0.12). Both luteinizing hormone‐releasing hormone agonists (hazard ratio, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.15–0.46; P < 0.001) and bilateral orchiectomy (hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06–0.31; P < 0.001) improved BPFS. When stratified by type of ADT (hormonal therapy vs orchiectomy), there was no difference in survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant ADT improves local, and systemic control after radical prostatectomy for pT3b prostate cancer. There is no difference in survival between patients receiving medical hormonal therapy vs patients undergoing orchiectomy. Given the lack of improvement in overall survival, continued investigation is needed to identify the cohort of pT3b patients at highest risk for cancer progression and therefore most likely to benefit from a multimodal treatment approach.     

Early results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation

Background : The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation were explored in the patients who received radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer.
Methods: Stage A₂, B or C prostate cancers were randomized to one of two groups: (i) group I ( n = 90), who received androgen deprivation (leuploride and chlormadinone acetate) for 3 months preoperatively followed by radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuploride only); and (ii) group II ( n = 86), who underwent the surgery followed by 3 month androgen deprivation and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy. The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on clinical relapse (serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) > 1.98 ng/mL, local recurrence or distant metastasis) and PSA relapse (PSA > 0.2 ng/mL) were evaluated at 2 years after randomization.
Results: There was no significant difference in clinical or PSA relapse-free survival and quality of life measures between the two groups, although relapses occurred significantly more frequently in patients who had more advanced stages, higher pretreatment PSA values or lower histologic differentiation in either group. Subgroup analysis indicated that clinical relapse-free survival in stage C cancer tended to be better in patients with preoperative androgen deprivation than in those patients without it ( P < 0.1).
Conclusions : Preoperative androgen deprivation may be beneficial for stage C prostate cancer patients receiving radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy over the 2 year observation period. A longer follow up is needed to clarify the exact extent of benefit in terms of survival and quality of life.