Convective warming combined with vasodilator therapy accelerates core rewarming after coronary artery bypass surgery

In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, we have investigated the effect of forced air warming on the rate of change of nasopharyngeal and rectal temperatures in 20 patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients had nasopharyngeal temperatures less than 36 degrees C on arrival in the intensive care unit and received an infusion of glyceryl trinitrate 15 mg h-1, but none received inotropes. Ten patients were warmed under an aluminized plastic "space" blanket (control group) and 10 were warmed under a "Bair Hugger" blanket connected to its power unit on "high" setting (Bair Hugger group). The rates of increase in nasopharyngeal temperature were 0.4 and 0.95 degrees C h-1, respectively, in the control and Bair Hugger groups (P < 0.01) during the first 2 h after operation. Over the same period of time, rectal temperatures increased at a rate of 0.25 and 0.75 degrees C h-1 in the control and Bair Hugger groups, respectively (P < 0.01).      

Skin-surface warming: heat flux and central temperature

The authors determined the efficacy of four postoperative warming devices by measuring cutaneous and tympanic membrane temperatures, and heat loss/gain using 11 thermocouples and ten thermal flux transducers in five healthy, unanesthetized volunteers. Overall thermal comfort was evaluated at 5-10 min intervals using a 10-cm visual analog scale. The warming devices were: 1) a pair of 250-W infrared heating lamps mounted 71 cm above the abdomen; 2) the Thermal Ceiling MTC XI UL (500 W) set on "high" and mounted 56 cm above the volunteer; 3) a 54-by-145-cm circulating-water blanket set to 40 degrees C placed over the volunteer; and 4) the Bair Hugger forced air warmer with an adult-sized cover set on "low" (approximately 33 degrees C), "medium" (approximately 38 degrees C), and "high" (approximately 43 degrees C). Following a 10-min control period, each device was placed over the volunteer and activated for a 30-min period. All devices were started "cold" and warmed up during the study period. The Bair Hugger set on "medium" decreased heat loss more than each radiant warming device and as much as the circulating-water blanket. All methods reached maximum efficacy within 20 min. Set on "high," the Bair Hugger increased skin-surface temperature more than the circulating-water blanket. The Bair Hugger (all settings) and the water blanket raised skin temperature more than the radiant heaters. The circulating-water blanket was the most effective device for heating an optimally placed transducer on the chest (directly under and parallel to the radiant heat sources, and touching the water and Bair Hugger blankets).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A reusable, custom-made warming blanket prevents core hypothermia during major neonatal surgery

PURPOSE: To introduce a reusable model of neonatal forced air warming blanket for intraoperative use during major noncardiac neonatal surgery and to determine clinical efficacy of this reusable blanket compared with the commonly used disposable blankets. METHODS: Delivered air temperature and calorie uptake of standard thermal bodies within the reusable blankets, Bair Hugger(R) blanket model 530 and model 555 were studied. Also, an efficacy study was conducted in 90 neonatal patients scheduled for major noncardiac surgery comparing the reusable blanket, the Bair Hugger(R) blanket model 530 and passive heat conservation as a control. The covered reusable blanket was used as a rescue procedure if the core temperature was < 35.5 degrees C. RESULTS: Delivered air temperature and heat transfer from the covered reusable blanket did not differ significantly from those of the Bair Hugger(R) blanket model 530 and model 555 (despite 0.75 degrees C-1.2 degrees C of heat trapped under the sheet and 1.3 Kcal less energy transfer). Temperatures measured underneath patients (correlated to poorly perfused areas) were highest using the Bair Hugger(R) blanket model 555. The reusable blanket was efficacious in preventing intraoperative core hypothermia and not different from the Bair Hugger(R) blanket model 530. About 1/3 of the patients in the control group had presented a core temperature < 35.5 degrees C but were successfully rescued using the reusable blanket. No adverse events were associated with any of these warming methods. CONCLUSION: This study shows the clinical efficacy of our reusable blanket for the prevention of core hypothermia during major neonatal surgery, which is not different from commonly used disposable blankets.     

Simulated clinical evaluation of four fluid warming devices*

The fluid warming capabilities of the Bair Hugger, Hotline, Standard Ranger and Fluido devices were evaluated in the laboratory with gravity flow via a 14G cannula (1 m head of fluid) and with the fluid bag pressurised to 300 mmHg. The resulting flows (70-450 ml.min(-1)) were recorded. At a room temperature of 22 degrees C, no device warmed the fluid to 37 degrees C. However, the Standard Ranger with gravity flow and the Fluido with both gravity and pressurised flow achieved 35 degrees C, whereas the Bair Hugger and Hotline with both gravity and pressurised flow, and the Standard Ranger with pressurised flow, achieved only 24-31 degrees C. However, from the way delivered temperatures changed with flow, we calculated that all four devices would achieve close to 37 degrees C at the flows specified by the manufacturers: 17, 83, 150 and 800 ml.min(-1) for the Bair Hugger, Hotline, Standard Ranger and Fluido, respectively.     

Heat conservation during abdominal surgery]

Intraoperative hypothermia is a major problem in anesthetic management. We compared the heat conserving effect of a forced air warming system (Bair Hugger, Augustine Medical Inc.) with that of a warming blanket. Sixteen patients undergoing abdominal surgery were studied. Patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide and oxygen combined with epidural anesthesia. Patients received tympanic, rectal, bladder and core temperature monitorings. Patients were divided randomly to Bair Hugger group (BH, n = 8) or warming blanket group (WB, n = 8). Temperature were measured every one hour over three hours. The BH group showed significantly higher temperatures than WB group. Bair Hugger system is an efficient way to maintain intraoperative body temperature.     

Efficacy of postoperative rewarming after cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of forced-air warmers and radiant heaters on rewarming after cardiac surgery in a prospective randomized study. METHODS: Fifty male patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery were studied. The control group (Gr. C, n=10) was nursed under a standard hospital blanket. Two groups were treated with forced-air warmers: WarmTouch 5700 (Gr. WT, n=10) and Bair Hugger 500 (Gr. BH, n=10). Two other groups were treated by radiant heaters: the Aragona Thermal Ceilings CTC X radiant heater (Gr. TC, n=10) and a self assembled radiant heater of 4 Hydrosun 500 infrared lamps (Gr. HY, n=10). Changes of oesophageal temperature, mean skin temperature, mean body temperature and relative heat balance were calculated from oesophageal temperature, 4 skin temperatures and oxygen consumption (VO(2)). RESULTS: All actively treated groups with exception of the TC group showed significantly faster oesophageal warming than the control group. The mean body temperature increased 1.1 (0.7-1.7) degrees Ch(-1) in Gr. WT, 1.3 (0.7-1.5) degrees Ch(-1) in Gr. BH, 0.8 (0.5-1.4) degrees Ch(-1) in Gr. TC and 0.7 (0.4-1.0) degrees Ch(-1) in Gr. HY compared to Gr. C with 0.4 (0.2-0.7) degrees Ch(-1). The mean VO(2) and the maxima of the VO(2) during the study period did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: In the current setting active warming, forced-air warming more than radiant warming, increased speed of rewarming two- to threefold in comparison to insulation with a blanket.     

Efficacy of forced-air warming systems with full body blankets

PURPOSE: Postoperative hypothermia after cardiac surgery is still a common problem often treated with forced-air warming. This study was conducted to determine the heat transfer efficacy of 11 forced-air warming systems with full body blankets on a validated copper manikin. METHODS: The following systems were tested: 1) Bair Hugger 505; 2) Bair Hugger 750; 3) Life-Air 1000 S; 4) Snuggle Warm; 5) Thermacare; 6) Thermacare with reusable Optisan blanket; 7) WarmAir; 8) Warm-Gard; 9) Warm-Gard and reusable blanket; 10) WarmTouch; and 11) WarmTouch and reusable blanket. Heat transfer of forced-air warmers can be described as follows: Q = h x DeltaT x A. Where Q = heat flux (W), h = heat exchange coefficient (W x m-2 x degrees C-1), DeltaT = temperature gradient between blanket and manikin surface (degrees C), A = covered area (m2). Heat flux per unit area and surface temperature were measured with 16 heat flux transducers. Blanket temperature was measured using 16 thermocouples. The temperature gradient between blanket and surface (DeltaT) was varied and h was determined by linear regression analysis. Mean DeltaT was determined for surface temperatures between 32 degrees C and 38 degrees C. The covered area was estimated to be 1.21 m2. RESULTS: For the 11 devices, heat transfers of 30.7 W to 77.3 W were observed for surface temperatures of 32 degrees C, and between -8.8 W to 29.6 W for surface temperatures of 38 degrees C. CONCLUSION: There are clinically relevant differences between the tested forced-air warming systems with full body blankets. Several systems were unable to transfer heat to the manikin at a surface temperature of 38 degrees C.     

Comparison of two convective warming systems during major abdominal and orthopedic surgery

PURPOSE: Convective warming is routinely employed to maintain perioperative normothermia. However, due to differences in nozzle temperature and air flow of the power units, there are clinically relevant differences in heat transfer among convective warming systems. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a quieter, convective warming system (WarmAir, sound pressure level 49 dba, air flow 35 cfm). The WarmAir system was compared to the standard, higher air flow system (Bair Hugger Model 750, sound pressure level 55 dba, air flow 48 cfm) with regards to temperature outcome. METHODS: Patients undergoing general anesthesia for major abdominal and orthopedic surgery were randomized into one of two groups: WarmAir or Bair Hugger. Both groups received an upper body, convective blanket using coverage appropriate for the given surgical procedure. Convective warming, at the high setting, was started after prepping and draping, and distal esophageal or nasopharyngeal temperature was measured intraoperatively. Sublingual temperature was measured preoperatively and on admission to the postanesthesia care unit. RESULTS: The WarmAir (n = 89) and Bair Hugger (n = 95) groups were similar with respect to age, gender, body mass index, ASA status, fluid balance, and duration of surgery. There was no difference in temperature outcomes between groups. In the WarmAir group, preoperative, lowest intraoperative, end of surgery, and postanesthesia care unit admission temperatures were (means +/- SD); 36.3 +/- 0.5, 35.4 +/- 1.1, 36.4 +/- 0.7, and 36.4 +/- 0.6 degrees C, respectively. Corresponding temperatures in the Bair Hugger group were; 36.3 +/- 0.6, 35.6 +/- 1.0, 36.5 +/- 0.6, and 36.4 +/- 0.5 degrees C, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in heating characteristics, both convective warming systems were effective in maintaining perioperative normothermia in patients undergoing major abdominal and orthopedic surgery. Therefore, choice of warming system is dependent on other factors such as ergonomics and cost.     

Randomized Prospective Comparison of Forced Air Warming Using Hospital Blankets versus Commercial Blankets in Surgical Patients

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an experimental approach to forced air warming using hospital blankets or a Bair Hugger warming unit (Augustine Medical Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) to create a tent of warm air.

Methods: Adult patients undergoing major surgery were studied. Patients were randomized to receive forced air warming using either a commercial Bair Hugger blanket (control group, n = 44; set point, 43[degrees]C) or standard hospital blankets (experimental group, n = 39; set point, 38[degrees]C). Distal esophageal temperatures were monitored. Patients were contacted the following day regarding any problems with the assigned warming technique.

Results: Surface area covered was 36 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD) in the experimental group and 40 +/- 10% in the control group. Final temperatures at the end of surgery were similar between groups: experimental, 36.2 +/- 0.6[degrees]C; control, 36.4 +/- 0.7[degrees]C. A similar number of patients had esophageal temperature less than 36[degrees]C at the end of surgery in both groups (experimental, 12 of 39 [31%]; control, 12 of 44 [27%]). The majority of patients were satisfied with their anesthetic and warming technique: experimental, 38 of 39 patients; control, 44 of 44 patients. There were no thermal injuries.     

Randomized prospective comparison of forced air warming using hospital blankets versus commercial blankets in surgical patients

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an experimental approach to forced air warming using hospital blankets or a Bair Hugger warming unit (Augustine Medical Inc., Eden Prairie, MN) to create a tent of warm air. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing major surgery were studied. Patients were randomized to receive forced air warming using either a commercial Bair Hugger blanket (control group, n = 44; set point, 43 degrees C) or standard hospital blankets (experimental group, n = 39; set point, 38 degrees C). Distal esophageal temperatures were monitored. Patients were contacted the following day regarding any problems with the assigned warming technique. RESULTS: Surface area covered was 36 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD) in the experimental group and 40 +/- 10% in the control group. Final temperatures at the end of surgery were similar between groups: experimental, 36.2 +/- 0.6 degrees C; control, 36.4 +/- 0.7 degrees C. A similar number of patients had esophageal temperature less than 36 degrees C at the end of surgery in both groups (experimental, 12 of 39 [31%]; control, 12 of 44 [27%]). The majority of patients were satisfied with their anesthetic and warming technique: experimental, 38 of 39 patients; control, 44 of 44 patients. There were no thermal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Standard hospital blankets heated to 38 degrees C forced air were equally as effective as commercial blankets heated with forced air at 43 degrees C. However, based on concerns expressed by the manufacturer, this experimental technique should not be used until further safety evaluation has been undertaken.     

Delayed forced air warming prevents hypothermia during abdominal aortic surgery

We have evaluated the efficacy of the delayed forced air warming during abdominal aortic surgery in 18 patients. Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups: the control group (n = 9) received no intraoperative warming device; the Bair-Hugger group (n = 9) had active skin surface warming with an upper body cover. The device was activated when core temperature decreased to less than 36 degrees C. The reduction in core temperature was 0.6 degrees C during the first hour after induction and 0.4 degrees C during the second hour in both groups. In the control group, core temperature continued to decrease until the end of surgery, whereas in the Bair-Hugger group, the reduction in core temperature stopped after 1 h of warming, and then rewarming began. At the end of surgery, core temperature in the Bair- Hugger group was similar to core temperature before induction, and was higher than core temperature in the control group (P < 0.003).      

Perioperative thermal insulation

To determine the efficacy of passive insulators advocated for prevention of cutaneous heat loss, we determined heat loss in unanesthetized volunteers covered by one of the following: a cloth "split sheet" surgical drape; a Convertors disposable-paper split sheet; a Thermadrape disposable laparotomy sheet; an unheated Bair Hugger patient-warming blanket; 1.5-mil-thick plastic hamper bags; and a prewarmed, cotton hospital blanket. Cutaneous heat loss was measured using 10 area-weighted thermal flux transducers while volunteers were exposed to a 20.6 degrees C environment for 1 h. Heat loss decreased significantly from 100 +/- 3 W during the control periods to 69 +/- 6 W (average of all covers) after 1 h of treatment. Heat losses from volunteers insulated by the Thermadrape (61 +/- 6 W) and Bair Hugger covers (64 +/- 5 W) were significantly less than losses from those insulated by plastic bags (77 +/- 11 W). The paper drape (67 +/- 7 W) provided slightly, but not significantly, better insulation than the cloth drape (70 +/- 4 W). Coverage by prewarmed cotton blankets initially resulted in the least heat loss (58 +/- 8 W), but after 40 min, resulted in heat loss significantly greater than that for the Thermadrape (71 +/- 7 W). Regional heat loss was roughly proportional to surface area, and the distribution of regional heat loss remained similar with all covers. These data suggest that cost and convenience should be major factors when choosing among passive perioperative insulating covers. It is likely that the amount of skin surface covered is more important than the choice of skin region covered or the choice of insulating material.     

A randomised controlled trial of the electric heating pad vs forced-air warming for preventing hypothermia during laparotomy

A randomised controlled trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of upper body forced-air warming (Bair Hugger, Augustine Medical model 500/OR, Prairie, MN) with that of an electric heating pad (Operatherm 202, KanMed, Bromma, Sweden) for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature in 60 patients undergoing laparotomy under general anaesthesia. The nasopharyngeal temperature was recorded throughout the operative period. The mean (SD) final temperatures were 36.2 (0.4) degrees C with forced-air warming and 35.5 (1.0) degrees C with electric heating pad (p < 0.01). Upper body forced-air warming is more effective than the heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during laparotomy.     

Limb tourniquets and central temperature in anesthetized children.

We have observed an association between the use of tourniquets for limb surgery and a progressive increase in body temperature in pediatric patients. Consequently, we evaluated the effect of leg tourniquet(s) on intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature in pediatric patients. We measured central temperature in three groups of children anesthetized with halothane and nitrous oxide: those with unilateral tourniquets (n = 15), those with bilateral tourniquets (n = 8), and a control group not requiring tourniquets (n = 24). Intraoperative ambient temperatures were maintained near 23 degrees C, respiratory gases were actively heated and humidified, and skin was warmed using a circulating water blanket set at 38 degrees C. The control patients remained normothermic during anesthesia and surgery. In contrast, central temperature increased 1.0 +/- 0.6 degrees C in 90 min in those with one tourniquet and 1.7 +/- 0.6 degrees C in those with bilateral tourniquets. The tourniquet-induced hyperthermia appeared to result from decreased effective heat loss from distal skin and from constraint of metabolic heat to the central thermal compartment. These data suggest that pediatric patients requiring intraoperative tourniquets should not be aggressively warmed during surgery.     

Deep accidental hypothermia and cardiac arrest rewarming with forced air

Background : During the last two cold winters we have treated 5 severely hypothermic patients (temperature below 30C) with active external rewarming rather than with extracorporal circulation and heat exchanger.
Patients : Two patients were found in cardiac arrest, and 3 victims of mountain accidents suffered deep hypothermia without arrest. In one of them, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was converted successfully to a sinus rhythm at a core temperature of 25.9C. Both arrested patients developed an adequate hemodynamic state during resuscitation although they were at very low temperature. All the patients were warmed with a convective cover inflated with warm air of about 38A°C (Bair Hugger). The core temperature increased by approximately 1°C/h in all patients. During rewarming we observed neither an initial drop of the core temperature (afterdrop) nor cardiac arrhythmias. The outcome of all 5 patients was good without neurological sequelae.
Conclusion : We conclude that external rewarming with forced air is a feasible alternative to cardiopulmonary bypass in severely hypothermic patients with electrical activity. This method can be used even in patients with VF because defibrillation can be successfully performed in deep hypothermia. Although afterdrop during external rewarming is feared, we did not observe this phenomenon. Rewarming with forced air is inexpensive, easy to perform and direct access to the patient is possible at any time. It does not require heparinisation and can be used in hospitals where they do not have cardiopulmonary bypass facilities. Thus, this method is particularly useful in situations when the hypothermic patient cannot be transferred to a major medical center.     

Temperature management during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of a circulating water system versus a forced-air system

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of a new temperature management system specifically designed for cardiac surgery (Allon ThermoWrapping Thermoregulation System; MTRE Advanced Technologies Ltd, Or Akiva, Israel) using a circulating-water garment and to compare it with a conventional forced-air cover system in order to determine whether it could reduce the incidence of perioperative hypothermia during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: University, tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one patients undergoing primary OPCAB surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients undergoing OPCAB surgery were randomized into the new thermoregulation system, Allon (study group, n = 15), and the standard forced-air system, Bair Hugger (Sterile Cardiac Access blanket Model 645; Augustine SA, Berne, Switzerland) (control group, n = 16). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rectal temperature was recorded each 30 minutes during surgery and at intensive care unit arrival. Patients in the study group had higher temperatures than the control group at all time points, and the difference reached statistical significance after 2 hours of surgery. Moreover, fewer patients in the study group suffered perioperative hypothermia (defined as rectal temperature <36 degrees C) than the control group (2/15 patients (13.3%) in the study group v 13/16 (81.3%) in the control group [p = 0.0006]). No difference in other outcomes was noted. None of the patients died in the hospital. There were no adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: The circulating-water garment, Allon ThermoWrapping Thermoregulation System, maintained normothermia during OPCAB surgery better than forced-air systems, especially after the first 2 hours of surgery, and it was not associated with surgical field disturbance.     

The effects of warming intravenous fluids on intraoperative hypothermia and postoperative shivering during prolonged abdominal surgery

Background: The infusion of several liters of crystalloid solution at room temperature may significantly contribute to intraoperative hypothermia because warming fluid to core temperature requires body heat. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of delivering warmed intravenous (IV) fluid to the patient on preventing intraoperative hypothermia.
Methods: Intraoperative core and mean skin temperatures were measured during prolonged abdominal surgery in 18 patients randomly divided into two groups according to intraoperative IV fluid management. In 9 patients (control group) all IV fluids infused were at room temperature. In the other 9 patients (group receiving warmed fluids) all IV fluids were warmed using an active IV fluid tube-warming system. In all 18 patients a warming blanket covered the skin surface available for cutaneous warming. Intraoperative changes in total body heat content (kJ) were calculated from core and mean skin temperatures.
Results: At the end of surgery, core temperature was 36.7±0.2°C in the group receiving warmed fluids and 35.8±0.2°C in the control group ( P <0.05). The estimated reduction in heat loss provided by warming IV fluid was 217 kJ, a value very close to the theoretical value expected from thermodynamic calculation. During recovery, one patient shivered in the group receiving warmed fluids and seven in the control group ( P <0.05).
Conclusion: In conclusion, infusion of warmed fluids, combined with skin-surface warming, helps to prevent hypothermia and reduces the incidence of postoperative shivering.     

Self-warming blanket versus forced-air warming blanket during total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised non-inferiority trial

Background

Arthroplasty patients are at high risk of hypothermia. Pre-warming with forced air has been shown to reduce the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia. There is, however, a lack of evidence that pre-warming with a self-warming (SW) blanket can reduce the incidence of perioperative hypothermia. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an SW blanket and a forced-air warming (FAW) blanket peri-operatively. We hypothesised that the SW blanket is inferior to the FAW blanket.

Methods

In total, 150 patients scheduled for primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia were randomised to this prospective study. Patients were pre-warmed with SW blanket (SW group) or upper-body FAW blanket (FAW group) set to 38°C for 30 min before spinal anaesthesia induction. Active warming was continued with the allocated blanket in the operating room. If core temperature fell below 36°C, all patients were warmed using the FAW blanket set to 43°C. Core and skin temperatures were measured continuously. The primary outcome was core temperature on admission to the recovery room.

Results

Both methods increased mean body temperature during pre-warming. However, intraoperative hypothermia occurred in 61% of patients in the SW group and in 49% in the FAW group. The FAW method set to 43°C could rewarm hypothermic patients. Core temperature did not differ between groups on admission to the recovery room, p = .366 (CI: −0.18–0.06).

Conclusions

Statistically, the SW blanket was non-inferior to the FAW method. Yet, hypothermia was more frequent in the SW group, requiring rescue warming as we strictly held to the NICE guideline.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03408197.     

Effect of forced-air warming on the performance of operating theatre laminar flow ventilation

Forced‐air warming exhaust may disrupt operating theatre airflows via formation of convection currents, which depends upon differences in exhaust and operating room air temperatures. We investigated whether the floor‐to‐ceiling temperatures around a draped manikin in a laminar‐flow theatre differed when using three types of warming devices: a forced‐air warming blanket (Bair Hugger?); an over‐body conductive blanket (Hot Dog?); and an under‐body resistive mattress (Inditherm?). With forced‐air warming, mean (SD) temperatures were significantly elevated over the surgical site vs those measured with the conductive blanket (+2.73 (0.7) °C; p < 0.001) or resistive mattress (+3.63 (0.7) °C; p < 0.001). Air temperature differences were insignificant between devices at floor (p = 0.339), knee (p = 0.799) and head height levels (p = 0.573). We conclude that forced‐air warming generates convection current activity in the vicinity of the surgical site. The clinical concern is that these currents may disrupt ventilation airflows intended to clear airborne contaminants from the surgical site.     

Comparison of forced-air warming and electric heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during total knee replacement

We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of forced-air warming (Bair Hugger(trade mark), Augustine Medical model 500/OR, Prairie, MN) with that of an electric heating pad (Operatherm 202, KanMed, Sweden) for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature in 60 patients undergoing total knee replacement under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Intra-operative tympanic and rectal temperatures and verbal analogue score for thermal comfort were recorded. There were no differences in any measurements between the two groups, with mean (SD) final rectal temperatures of 36.8 (0.4) degrees C with forced-air warming and 36.9 (0.4) degrees C with the electric pad. The heating pad is as effective as forced-air warming for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature.