Phase I study of PKC412 (N-benzoyl-staurosporine), a novel oral protein kinase C inhibitor, combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: PKC412 (N-benzoyl-staurosporine), an oral inhibitor of protein kinase C, is capable of cell cycle inhibition and is endowed with anti-angiogenic properties. This dose-finding phase I study was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PKC412 when combined with cisplatin-gemcitabine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Escalating doses of PKC412 were given every day of a 4 week cycle with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Dose escalation was based on a modified continuous reassessment method. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients, assigned to four cohorts receiving PKC412 at a dose ranging from 25 to 150 mg/day were evaluable. Grade 3 diarrhea occurring in 3/4 patients at cycle 1 led us to define 150 mg/day as the MTD. The MTD based on multiple cycles was redefined as 100 mg/day, since prolonged grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 3/7 patients after repeated cycles. The next lower dose tested of 50 mg/day was therefore considered as the recommended dose for phase II trials. Among 33 cycles in eight patients, toxicity consisted of grade 1-2 diarrhea (12.5%) and asthenia (50%) with only one patient experiencing grade 3 headache at this dose level. A partial response was observed in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present study indicate that PKC412 at a dose of 50 mg/day can be safely added to cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irinotecan administered as a low-dose, continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days in patients with malignant solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of administering irinotecan as a continuous intravenous infusion for 14 to 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy received continuous infusions of irinotecan by means of an ambulatory infusion pump. The starting dosage was 12.5 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days every 3 weeks. After identification of the maximum-tolerated dose for the 14-day infusion schedule, the protocol was amended to prolong the infusion duration to 17 and 21 days. Pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and SN-38 and its glucuronide were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography and noncompartmental modeling. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients received 85+ courses. At the first dose level (12.5 mg/m(2)/d), cumulative grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in three of five patients. At a dosage of 10 mg/m(2)/d, 14-day administration resulted in grade 4 diarrhea in two of six patients and one episode of grade 4 vomiting occurred, whereas with 17-day administration, one episode of grade 3 nausea and two episodes of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea were observed in six patients. Increasing the number of days of infusion to 21 days was not feasible because of cumulative diarrhea. Hematologic toxicity was rare. The mean metabolic SN-38 area under the curve/irinotecan area under the curve ratio was 16% +/- 6% compared with 3% to 5% after short infusion schedules involving therapeutic dosages. Partial responses were observed in two patients with extraovarian and colorectal cancer. CONCLUSION: The recommended dosage is 10 mg/m(2)/d for 14 days, repeated every 3 weeks. Enhanced metabolism of irinotecan to SN-38 may explain in part the low recommended dose for this schedule.     

A phase I trial of celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer

Purpose This phase I study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose of the combination of celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, with docetaxel and irinotecan, in patients with advanced solid tumors.Patients and methods Patients with solid tumors received one of three escalating dose levels of daily celecoxib in combination with docetaxel and irinotecan administered on days 1 and 8 of an every 21-day cycle. Toxicities were graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) and recorded as maximum grade per patient for each treatment cycle.Results A total of 19 patients received 90 cycles of treatment through three dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities were nausea and diarrhea. The most common treatment-related toxicities in all cycles of treatment were alopecia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, anemia, anorexia, and edema.. The maximum tolerated dose was established at celecoxib 400 mg twice a day continuously, weekly docetaxel 30 mg/m² and irinotecan 50 mg/m² for 2 weeks every 21 days. Disease stabilization (five or more cycles) was documented in eight patients.Conclusion The combination of celecoxib with docetaxel and irinotecan did not ameliorate irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Although prolonged disease stabilization was achieved in some patients, we do not recommend combining celecoxib with docetaxel and irinotecan because of lack of activity and the side effect profile of this combination.This work was supported by Grants from the Pfizer Corporation and Aventis Corporation.     

Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma

Background: Vorinostat has demonstrated activity in refractorycutaneous T-cell lymphoma. In a phase I trial, an encouragingactivity in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was noted. Patients and methods: We carried out a phase II trial (NCT00097929 [ClinicalTrials.gov] )of oral vorinostat 300 mg b.i.d. (14 days/3 weeks or 3 days/week)in patients with measurable, relapsed DLBCL who had receivedtwo or more systemic therapies. Response rate and duration (DOR),time to progression (TTP) and safety were assessed. Results: Eighteen patients were enrolled (median age: 66 years;median prior therapies: 2). Seven received 300 mg b.i.d. 14days/3 weeks, but four had grade 3 or 4 toxicity (dose-limitingtoxicity, DLT). The schedule was amended to 300 mg b.i.d. 3days/week), and none had DLT. One achieved a complete response(TtR = 85 days; DOR = >468 days) and one had stable disease(301 days). Sixteen discontinued for progressive disease; medianTTP was 44 days. Median number of cycles was 2 (1 to >19).Common drug-related adverse experiences (AEs; mostly grade 1/2)were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, anemia and vomiting. Three patientshad dose reduction; none discontinued for drug-related AEs.Drug-related AE grade 3 included thrombocytopenia (16.7%) andasthenia (11.1%). Conclusion: Vorinostat was well tolerated at 300 mg b.i.d. 3days/week or 200 mg b.i.d. 14 days/3 weeks but had limited activityagainst relapsed DLBCL. Key words: diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma, DLBCL, HDAC, histone deacetylase inhibitor, SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, vorinostat Received for publication January 9, 2008. Accepted for publication January 15, 2008.     

UFT and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. An Early Clinical Studies Group (ECSG)/European Organization for Research Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) phase II trial

A phase II study was performed to evaluate 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil and uracil (UFT) and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in European patients with advanced gastric cancer. From 38 patients, 25 were evaluable for response and 36 for toxicity. Patients received UFT at 300 mg/m(2)/day for 28 days, every 35 days and leucovorin at 90 mg/day on an identical schedule. Overall response rate was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-22.5%) in intent-to-treat analysis and 16% (95% CI: 5.7-33%) in evaluable patients. Grade 3-4 common toxicity criteria (CTC) toxicities were diarrhoea (28%; 10/36), nausea (11%; 4/36), vomiting (8%; 3/36) and asthenia (11%; 4/36). 23 patients in 44% (42/96) of the courses had to skip days of treatment due to toxicity or to non-compliance. In conclusion, UFT+leucovorin has a definitive, but low, efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal and treatment needs to be withheld if grade 2 diarrhoea occurs.     

Phase I study with pharmacokinetics of S-1 on an oral daily schedule for 28 days in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Our purpose in the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity and investigate the clinical pharmacology of S-1, a combination of tegafur, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP), and potassium oxonate. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors, adequate organ function, and no anticancer therapy in the preceding 4 weeks. Dose level 1 was 30 mg/m(2)/dose, level 2 was 40 mg/m(2)/dose, and level 3 was 35 allmg/m(2)/dose, all of the levels comprising two daily doses. S-1 was administered as a single dose at each level, and its pharmacology was studied. The first course was begun 3 days later and consisted of 28 consecutive treatment days, followed by a 1-week rest. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled; toxicity could be assessed in all of the 16 and response in 15. At dose level 1, two of nine patients developed grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia or diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity (diarrhea) occurred in all three of the patients at dose level 2. The protocol was, therefore, amended to include an intermediate dose level (level 3), which caused grade 3 or 4 diarrhea or hyperbilirubinemia in three of four patients. Dose level 1 was thus considered as the maximum tolerated dose. Other grade 3 or 4 toxic effects at dose level 2 or 3 were granulocytopenia, nausea, and vomiting. The pharmacology of tegafur, CDHP, potassium oxonate, and fluorouracil (a metabolite of tegafur) was characterized by rapid absorption and was consistent with first-order kinetics. One patient with colorectal cancer had a durable partial response. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended S-1 dose for future studies is 30 mg/m(2) twice daily, and diarrhea is the most frequent toxic effect. Additional trials of S-1 in the treatment of patients with solid tumors are warranted.     

ZD1839, a selective oral epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and active in patients with solid, malignant tumors: results of a phase I trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of the oral, selective epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ZD1839 in patients with solid malignant tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open, phase I, escalating multiple-dose tolerability and pharmacokinetic trial. ZD1839 was administered once daily for 14 consecutive days followed by 14 days off treatment. Dose escalation started at 50 mg/d and continued to 925 mg or until consistent dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were entered at eight dose levels. The most frequent dose-related grade 1 and 2 adverse events were an acne-like (or folliculitis) rash, nausea, and diarrhea. Three of nine patients treated at 700 mg/d developed DLT (reversible grade 3 diarrhea); grade 3 and 4 events were uncommon. Exposure to ZD1839 was dose proportional, and the mean terminal half-life was 48 hours (range, 37 to 65). Four of 16 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) had objective partial responses observed from ZD1839 300 to 700 mg/d. Overall, 16 patients remained on study for > or = 3 months, with seven of these patients (five with NSCLC, including three of the patients with partial response) remaining on study for > or = 6 months. CONCLUSION: ZD1839 was well tolerated, with DLT observed at a dose well above that at which antitumor activity was seen. Pharmacokinetic analysis confirmed that ZD1839 was suitable for administration as a once-daily oral tablet formulation. Phase II monotherapy and phase III combination trials in NSCLC are being conducted to investigate further the efficacy, tolerability, and optimal daily dose of ZD1839.     

A phase I study of combined UFT plus leucovorin and radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: This Phase I study combines tegafur and uracil (UFT) with leucovorin and conventional radiation for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. The design seeks to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of this regimen as well as to define a future Phase II dose level. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced and unresectable pancreatic cancer were treated with 45 Gy of radiation therapy. The initial UFT dose was 150 mg/m(2)/day given with leucovorin 90 mg/day, both divided into 3 daily doses for 35 days concurrent with radiation. UFT doses were escalated at increments of 50 mg/m(2)/day. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Grade 3 or greater nausea, vomiting or diarrhea despite medical intervention; or Grade 3 or greater neutropenia/thrombocytopenia; or Grade 3 or greater hepatic toxicity; or inability of the patient to take 75% or more of the planned UFT/leucovorin; or radiotherapy interruption of greater than 1 week. The MTD for UFT/leucovorin was exceeded by one dose level when a certain dose caused DLT in 2 or more patients of 6. RESULTS: Five evaluable patients had Stage I resectable disease but had pathologic adenopathy. Seven had Stage II unresectable disease. Compliance with therapy was excellent. At a daily dose of 300 mg/m(2) of UFT, we noticed minimal diarrhea and hematologic toxicity with mild-moderate nausea, anorexia, and fatigue. Three patients had Grade 4 toxicity: 1 had neutropenia on Day 38, 1 had diarrhea on Day 55, and 1 had vomiting on Day 15. CONCLUSION: Oral UFT/leucovorin and radiation therapy offers patients a viable treatment option for pancreatic cancer. The major known toxicity of diarrhea was tolerable. The MTD was not reached in this study. Our current plan is to expand this into a Phase I/II trial beginning at a UFT dose of 300 mg/m(2) and correlate this with clinical pharmacologic parameters. The potential benefit of long bioavailability and oral delivery of UFT compares favorably with continuous infusion regimens without the added morbidity of a catheter and pump.     

A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of TKI258, an oral, multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of TKI258 (formerly CHIR-258). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A phase I dose escalating trial in patients with advanced solid tumors was performed. Treatment was initially as single daily doses on an intermittent 7-day on/7-day off schedule. Following a protocol amendment, a second schedule comprised, during cycle 1, 7-day on/7-day off treatment followed by 14 days of continuous daily dosing; subsequent cycles comprised 28 days of daily dosing. Pharmacokinetics and evaluation of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells were done during the first 28 days of each schedule. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated in four intermittent (25-100 mg/d) and three continuous (100-175 mg/d) dosing cohorts. Observed drug-related toxicities were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, headache, anorexia, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 hypertension in one patient at 100 mg continuous dosing, grade 3 anorexia in a second patient at 175 mg, and grade 3 alkaline phosphatase elevation in a third patient at 175 mg. One patient had a partial response (melanoma) and two patients had stable disease >6 months. TKI258 pharmacokinetics were linear over the dose range of 25 to 175 mg. Five of 14 evaluable patients had modulation of phosphorylated ERK levels. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD was defined as 125 mg/d. Evidence of antitumor activity in melanoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors warrants further investigation, and other phase I studies are ongoing. Further pharmacodynamic evaluation is required in these studies to evaluate the biological effects of TKI258.     

Gefitinib in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid and irinotecan in patients with 5-FU/oxaliplatin- refractory colorectal cancer: a phase I/II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. It potentiates cytotoxic drug activity in human xenografts. This phase I/II dose-finding study evaluated gefitinib in combination with a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA)/irinotecan (FOLFIRI-AIO) regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received gefitinib 250 mg per day, and escalating doses of FOLFIRI-AIO i.v. (dose level (DL) 1: 1600/ 500/60 mg/m(2); DL2: 1600/500/80 mg/m(2); DL3: 2000/500/ 80 mg/m(2)) weekly x 6. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined in patients who completed 1 cycle of therapy. RESULTS: 13 patients were enrolled. 1 out of 6 patients on DL1 exhibited DLT (acute psychosis), and a total of 7 patients received DL2. Of those, 3 patients had DLT during cycle 1 (nausea/vomiting n = 2; diarrhea n = 1, fatigue n = 2). Recruitment was stopped at this DL because of the unfavorable toxicity profile observed during the first and subsequent treatment cycles (out of 7 patients: nausea/vomiting grade 3 n = 2, diarrhea grade 3 n = 2; fatigue n = 3). Only 1 patient showed a partial remission, and 2 patients experienced stabilization of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Dose escalation had to be stopped early because of gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue. This treatment regimen did not seem advantageous with respect to efficacy in comparison with FOLFIRIAIO alone.     

Dose escalation study on oxaliplatin and capecitabine (Xeloda) in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES: Capecitabine (CAP) and oxaliplatin (OX) have shown interesting activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of their combination in patients with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three pretreated patients with histologically confirmed inoperable neoplasms were enrolled. The patients' median age was 64 years, 21 were males, and 27 had a WHO performance status of 0-1. OX was administered on days 1 and 8, as a 3-hour intravenous infusion, at escalated doses ranging from 50 to 70 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally for 14 consecutive days, at escalated doses ranging from 1,200 to 2,100 mg/m(2)/day. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: At the dose of 2,100 mg/m(2) (Xeloda) and 70 mg/m(2) (OX), all 3 enrolled patients presented DLT (grade 3 diarrhea, grade 3 asthenia and grade 3 neurotoxicity, respectively), and, thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies are 2,000 mg/m(2) for CAP and 70 mg/m(2 )for OX. A total of 145 treatment cycles were administered. Toxicity was very mild. Grade 2/3 neutropenia was observed in 4 (3%) treatment cycles. The main nonhematologic toxicities were grade 2/3 nausea/vomiting (7 cycles; 5%), grade 2/3 neurotoxicity (10 cycles; 7%), grade 2/3 asthenia (8 cycles; 5.5%) and grade 2/3 diarrhea (6 cycles; 4%). There was no treatment-related death. One (4%) complete remission, 2 (8%) partial remissions, and 9 (36%) cases of stable disease were observed among 25 evaluable patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate that CAP and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and that this regimen merits further evaluation.     

Phase I study of temozolomide and irinotecan for recurrent malignant gliomas in patients receiving enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs: a north american brain tumor consortium study.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan when administrated with temozolomide every 28 days, in patients with recurrent malignant glioma who were also receiving CYP450 enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAED), and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites. The study was also intended to assess whether temozolomide affects the conversion of irinotecan to SN-38. DESIGN: Patients with recurrent malignant glioma received a fixed dose of temozolomide (150 mg/m(2)) daily for 5 days from days 1 to 5 every 28 days, and an i.v. infusion of irinotecan on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. The starting dose of irinotecan was 350 mg/m(2), which was escalated to 550 mg/m(2) in 50-mg/m(2) increments. The plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite, SN-38, were determined during the infusion of irinotecan on cycle 1, day 1. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled into the study and treated. Thirty-one patients were evaluable for both tumor response and toxicity and two patients were evaluable for toxicity only. Common toxicities included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 diarrhea and nausea/vomiting. The maximum tolerated dose for irinotecan was determined to be 500 mg/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose of irinotecan in combination with temozolomide for patients receiving EIAEDs is 500 mg/m(2), administrated every 15 days on a 28-day schedule. This study also confirmed that concomitant administration of EIAEDs increases irinotecan clearance and influences SN-38 disposition. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed between temozolomide and irinotecan.     

Tegafur and uracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity and toxicity of tegafur and uracil (UFT; 1:4 molar ratio) plus leucovorin (LV) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. One hundred forty-one patients were entered into the study. The treatment schedule consisted of UFT 300 mg/m2/day (in three divided doses) plus oral LV 150 mg/day (50 mg t.i.d.) over 28 days. The treatment cycle was repeated every 5 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The treatment was interrupted if grade 3/4 toxicity appeared and was resumed at the same dosage on recovery. One hundred thirty-six patients were evaluable for response and 141 were evaluable for toxicity. The response rate was 19.9% (95% confidence interval: 12%-28%). The total number of patients without progression (objective response + stable disease) was 76 (55.9%). The median time to progression was 5.6 months, and the overall survival was 11.6 months. The toxicity profile was low, with 11% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 nausea and vomiting, while 17% had grade 3/4 diarrhea. Oral administration of UFT modulated with LV is a comfortable regimen of chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the oral farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 given twice daily to patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile, maximum-tolerated dose, and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCH 66336 was given orally bid without interruption to patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled onto the study. Dose levels studied were 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 300 mg bid. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. At 400 mg bid, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of grade 4 vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and the combination of grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea with reversible grade 3 plasma creatinine elevation. After dose reduction, at 300 mg bid, the DLTs consisted of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 neurocortical toxicity, and the combination of grade 3 fatigue with grade 2 nausea and diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 200 mg bid, which was found feasible for prolonged periods of time. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a greater than dose-proportional increase in drug exposure and peak plasma concentrations, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation on multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 4 to 11 hours and seemed to increase with increasing doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained at days 7 through 14. A large volume of distribution at steady-state indicated extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. CONCLUSION: SCH 66336 can be administered safely using a continuous oral bid dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 200 mg bid.     

A prolonged methoxymorpholino doxorubicin (PNU-152243 or MMRDX) infusion schedule in patients with solid tumours: a phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study

The aim of this phase I study was to assess feasibility, pharmacokinetics and toxicity of methoxymorpholino doxorubicin (MMRDX or PNU-152243) administered as a 3 h intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks. Fourteen patients with intrinsically anthracycline-resistant tumours received 37 cycles of MMRDX. The first cohort of patients was treated with 1 mg m(-2) of MMRDX. The next cohorts received 1.25 mg m(-2) and 1.5 mg m(-2) respectively. Common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade III/IV nausea and vomiting were observed in 1/18 cycles at 1.25 mg m(-2) and in 2/11 cycles at 1.5 mg m(-2). Transient elevation in transaminases up to CTC grade III was observed in 2/16 cycles at 1.25 mg m(-2) and 4/11 cycles at 1.5 mg m(-2). No cardiotoxicity was observed. At 1.25 mg m(-2) CTC grade IV neutropenia occurred in 1/17 cycles. At 1.5 mg m(-2) CTC grade III neutropenia was seen in 2/7 and grade IV in 3/7 evaluable cycles. Thrombocytopenia grade III was observed in 2/9 and grade IV in 1/9 evaluable cycles. One patient treated at 1.5 mg m(-2) died with neutropenic fever. Therefore, dose-limiting toxicity was reached and 1.25 mg m(-2) was considered the maximum tolerated dose for MMRDX as 3 h infusion. No tumour responses were observed. Pharmacokinetic parameters showed a rapid clearance of MMRDX from the circulation by an extensive tissue distribution. Renal excretion of the drug and its metabolite was negligible. In conclusion, prolongation of MMRDX infusion to 3 h does not improve the toxicity profile as compared with bolus administration.     

Phase I trial of UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer

UFT (BMS-200604, Uftoral) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that combines uracil and the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, ftorafur, in a 4:1 molar ratio with single-agent activity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers. In vitro studies have shown that irinotecan downregulates thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in tumour cells, leading to synergy between irinotecan and 5-FU that is maximal when irinotecan is given 24 h prior to 5-FU. Given this observed synergy and the confirmatory clinical activity of combination therapy with 5-FU, leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, we performed a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of UFT, LV, and irinotecan. Treatment consisted of irinotecan administered as a 90-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 followed by twice daily oral UFT/LV on days 2-15, repeated every 21 days. Initial doses were irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) and UFT 200 mg/m(2)/day, with LV dose fixed at 60 mg/day. 31 patients received a total of 130 cycles of UFT/LV and irinotecan. 3 of 9 patients experienced grade 3/4 diarrhoea at the highest dose level of irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day. Other toxicities included neutropenia, anaemia, alopecia, nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Further dose escalation was not pursued since this level of toxicity was appropriate for future phase II study. One patient with colorectal cancer experienced a partial response and 9 patients with non-small cell lung, colorectal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinomas had disease stabilisation lasting 4-26 (median 6) cycles. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotype was analysed in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNs) obtained from 24 patients. 2 patients had the homozygous TT polymorphism and 1 of them had grade 3 diarrhoea at the first dose level. Irinotecan on day 1 followed by a 14-day course of oral UFT/LV beginning on day 2 is well tolerated, and suitable for testing in several tumour types. Doses recommended for further study on this schedule are irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day, with LV 60 mg/day.     

Gastrointestinal Adverse Effects in Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Different Schedules of FOLFOX

Background: To assess the frequency and severity of gastrointestinal adverse effects in advanced colorectalcarcinoma patients treated with four different schedules of FOLFOX. Materials and Methods: Patients(median age 61 years) who underwent surgery were included in the study. All had measureable disease at CTscan, ultrasonography or clinical examination. Toxicity was graded on a scale of 1-5 according to the generalgrade definition of CTC v2.0. The severity of adverse effects (Grade 3 and 4) assessed in each treatment armwas compared. Results: Differences between the incidence rates of 3 and 4 toxicity and all grades of toxicityfor all parameters in GI toxicity were very highly significant (p<0.001). Severe gastrointestinal symptoms oftoxicity were noted with FOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2). Grade 3 diarrhea was reported in 25% patientsand grade 4 diarrhea in 4% in the FOLFOX7 treatment arm. Grade 2 vomiting was very frequently reported inthe FOLFOX4 treatment arm (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2). Grade 2 stomatitis was reported in 42% patients treatedwith mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin 100mg/m2). Differences in the incidence rate of nausea, diarrhea and stomatitisamong all treatment arms of FOLFOX were significant (p<0.05) . Conclusions: Severe diarrhea is associatedwith FOLFOX7 treatment. No grade 3 or 4 GI toxicity was reported in patients of the mFOLFOX6 arm.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of temsirolimus (CCI-779) administered intravenously daily for 5 days every 2 weeks to patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer received temsirolimus (Torisel, CCI-779), a novel inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin, i.v. once daily for 5 days every 2 weeks to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity profile, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor efficacy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Doses were escalated in successive cohorts of patients using a conventional phase I clinical trial design. Samples of whole blood and plasma were collected to determine the pharmacokinetics of temsirolimus and sirolimus, its principal metabolite. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were treated with temsirolimus (0.75-24 mg/m(2)/d). The most common drug-related toxicities were asthenia, mucositis, nausea, and cutaneous toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was 15 mg/m(2)/d for patients with extensive prior treatment because, in the 19 mg/m(2)/d cohort, two patients had dose-limiting toxicities (one with grade 3 vomiting, diarrhea, and asthenia and one with elevated transaminases) and three patients required dose reductions. For minimally pretreated patients, in the 24 mg/m(2)/d cohort, one patient developed a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 stomatitis and two patients required dose reductions, establishing 19 mg/m(2)/d as the maximum acceptable dose. Immunologic studies did not show any consistent trend toward immunosuppression. Temsirolimus exposure increased with dose in a less than proportional manner. Terminal half-life was 13 to 25 hours. Sirolimus-to-temsirolimus exposure ratios were 0.6 to 1.8. A patient with non-small cell lung cancer achieved a confirmed partial response, which lasted for 12.7 months. Three patients had unconfirmed partial responses; two patients had stable disease for >/=24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Temsirolimus was generally well tolerated on this intermittent schedule. Encouraging preliminary antitumor activity was observed.     

A phase 1 pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the novel hydroxamate histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat (previously named PXD101) in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Sequential dose-escalating cohorts of three to six patients received belinostat administered as a 30-min i.v. infusion on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetic variables were evaluated at all dose levels. Pharmacodynamic measurements included acetylation of histones extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, caspase-dependent cleavage of cytokeratin-18, and interleukin-6 levels. RESULTS: Forty-six patients received belinostat at one of six dose levels (150-1,200 mg/m(2)/d). Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3 fatigue (one patient at 600 mg/m(2); one patient at 1,200 mg/m(2)), grade 3 diarrhea combined with fatigue (one patient at 1,200 mg/m(2)), grade 3 atrial fibrillation (one patient at 1,200 mg/m(2); one patient at 1,000 mg/m(2)), and grade 2 nausea/vomiting leading to inability to complete a full 5-day cycle (two patients at 1,000 mg/m(2)). The maximum tolerated dose was 1,000 mg/m(2)/d. I.v. belinostat displayed linear pharmacokinetics with respect to C(max) and AUC. The intermediate elimination half-life was 0.3 to 1.3 h and was independent of dose. Histone H4 hyperacetylation was observed after each infusion and was sustained for 4 to 24 h in a dose-dependent manner. Increases in interleukin-6 levels were detected following belinostat treatment. Stable disease was observed in a total of 18 (39%) patients, including 15 treated for > or =4 cycles, and this was associated with caspase-dependent cleavage of cytokeratin-18. Of the 24 patients treated at the maximum tolerated dose (1,000 mg/m(2)/d), 50% achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: I.v. belinostat is well tolerated, exhibits dose-dependent pharmacodynamic effects, and has promising antitumor activity.     

Oral doxifluridine in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A phase II study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains one of the most common neoplasms in the world. Doxifluridine is an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative activated to 5-fluorouracil by uridine phosphorylase which is more expressed in malignant cells. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to evaluate the activity of oral doxifluridine in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Twenty-five advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients entered the study; doxifluridine was given orally at the initial daily total dose of 2,250 mg for 4 consecutive days every week. All patients are evaluable for toxicity: these included mainly grade 1-2 (WHO) diarrhea, stomatitis, nausea and vomiting; 4 patients (16%) experienced grade 3-4 diarrhea. Twenty-four patients are evaluable for response and 1 complete and 3 partial responses have been observed (response rat 17%, 95% confidence interval: 5-37). Oral doxifluridine at the dose and schedule we used, although having only modest activity in advanced HCC, may represent an alternative to other frequently used chemotherapeutic agents, because of its favorable toxicity profile and its simple route of administration.