完全性左束支阻滞和右束支阻滞心电图结果分析

目的 了解完全性左束支阻滞和右束支阻滞不同性别、不同年龄的发生率情况.方法 分析108 610例常规心电图检测结果,分别统计完全性左束支阻滞和右束支阻滞不同性别、不同年龄的发生率情况.结果 108 610例门诊及住院患者资料,完全性左束支阻滞19例,占0.18％;右束支阻滞3 794例,占3.49％;完全性左束支阻滞发生率在不同性别之间差异无统计学意义（Х^2=1.707,P=0.191）,不同年龄之间比较差异有统计学意义（Х^2=209.874,P＜0.05）;右束支阻滞发生率在不同性别之间、不同年龄之间比较,差异均有统计学意义（Х^2=986.046,P＜0.05;Х^2=1 483.286,P＜0.05）.结论 60岁以上老年人的完全性左束支阻滞和右束支阻滞发生率较高,应定期进行常规心电图检查,及时发现异常情况并进行相应的处理.     

Recovery of complete left bundle branch block following heart failure improvement by left bundle branch pacing in a patient

A 57‐year‐old male presented with symptomatic systolic heart failure and complete left bundle branch block (LBBB). Left bundle branch pacing corrected LBBB at a low capture threshold (0.5V @0.4ms) with right bundle branch conduction delay and paced QRS morphology changed to near‐normal by adjusting AV delay with diminished RBBD. At 1‐year follow‐up, the patient had a significant improvement in heart failure and LBBB automatically resolved with a rate‐dependent pattern. LBBP may be an alternative to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy with the likelihood of recovery of LBBB. More research is needed to evaluate the potential use of this pacing strategy in patients with LBBB and heart failure.     

Alternating right and left bundle branch block aberration during atrial tachycardia

In a patient with atrial tachycardia with a rate of 200 per minute, the A-V conduction ratio was at times 2:1, but often it was 4:3 or 3:2 with progressive P-R interval prolongation (Wenckebach mechanism, an expression of presumable A-V nodal block). In each episode of 4:3 conduction, the first QRS complex was narrow, and the 2 ensuing beats were wide due to aberrant conduction. Aberration did not occur with a constant configuration, but in consecutive episodes of 4:3 conduction ratio there was a regular alternation of left bundle branch block and right bundle branch block. The pattern was explained by concealed retrograde conduction into the anterogradely blocked bundle branch. This caused 2 distinct effects: (1) shifting “to the right” of the refractory period of the affected bundle branch, resulting in maintenance of aberration with the same configuration, if consecutive atrial impulses were conducted to the ventricles, and (2) shortening of the effective cycle of the affected bundle branch, resulting in aberration due to block of the controlateral bundle branch, whenever a pause occasioned by a nonconducted atrial impulse was followed by restoration of 1:1 conduction for 2 or more consecutive beats.     

Recovery of complete left bundle branch block in a dilated cardiomyopathy patient after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan: A case report

Rationale:The treatment of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has recently been greatly improved, especially with the widespread use of sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) combination therapy. We know that ARNI-like drugs can significantly improve the symptoms of heart failure with reducing ejection fraction. However, clinical studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of ARNI in DCM-associated arrhythmia are limited, and whether individuals with arrhythmia would benefit from ARNI remains controversial. In this case, we report a patient with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) associated with DCM whose CLBBB returned to normal after treatment with ARNI.Patient concerns:A 38-year-old man was admitted to the hospital for 20 days for idiopathic paroxysmal dyspnea. He presented with exacerbated dyspnea symptoms at night, accompanied by cough and sputum.Diagnosis:Physical examination revealed a grade 4/6 systolic murmur could be heard in the apical area of the heart and mild edema was present in both lower limbs. Laboratory examination found that the B-type natriuretic peptide was significantly increased. Echocardiography indicated left atrial internal diameter, right ventricular internal diameter, and left ventricular diastolic diameter were enlarged and ejection fraction was significantly decreased. Besides, the pulsation of the wall was diffusely attenuated. Electrocardiogram was suggestive of tachycardia and CLBBB. A diagnosis of DCM with CLBBB was considered based on a comprehensive evaluation of the physical examination, laboratory examination, echocardiography and electrocardiogram.Interventions:The patient was treated with ARNI at a dose of 50 mg (twice a day) at first, gradually increasing to the target dose (200 mg, twice a day) in the following 9 months as shown in Table ​Table1,1, along with metoprolol 25 mg (once a day [qd]), diuretics 20 mg (qd), and aldosterone 20 mg (qd).Table 1Specific medications used in treatment.

Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block

BackgroundLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has been suggested as an alternative means to deliver cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).HypothesisLBBP may deliver resynchronization therapy along with an advantage over traditional biventricular (BiV) pacing in clinical outcomes.MethodsHeart failure patients who presented LBBB morphology according to Strauss''s criteria and received successful CRT procedure were enrolled in the present study. Propensity score matching was applied to match patients into LBBP‐CRT group and BiV‐CRT group. Then, the electrographic data, the echocardiographic data and New York heart association (NYHA) class were compared between the groups.ResultsTwenty‐one patients with successful LBBP procedure and another 21 matched patients with successful BiV‐CRT procedure were finally enrolled in the study. The QRS duration (QRSd) was narrowed from 167.7 ± 14.9 ms to 111.7 ± 12.3 ms (P < .0001) in the LBBP‐CRT group and from 163.6 ± 13.8 ms to 130.1 ± 14.0 ms (P < .0001) in the BiV‐CRT group. A trend toward better left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was recorded in the LBBP‐CRT group (50.9 ± 10.7% vs 44.4 ± 13.3%, P = .12) compared to that in the BiV‐CRT group at the 6‐month follow‐up. A trend toward better echocardiographic response was documented in patients receiving LBBP‐CRT procedure (90.5% vs 80.9%, P = .43) and more super CRT response was documented in the LBBP‐CRT group (80.9% vs 57.1%, P = .09) compared to that in the BiV‐CRT group.ConclusionsLBBP‐CRT can dramatically improve the electrical synchrony in heart failure patients with LBBB. Meanwhile, compared with the traditional BiV‐CRT, it has a tendency to significantly improve LVEF and enhance the NYHA cardiac function scores.     

完全性左束支阻滞的发生率及心电图特点

目的 观察受检者完全性左束支阻滞的发生率及心电图特点.方法 记录和分析86621例常规12导联同步心电图,分别统计完全性左束支阻滞(CLBBB)及右束支阻滞(RBBB)的发生情况及心电图特点.结果 检出完全性左束支阻滞(CLBBB) 170例,占0.19％;检出RBBB3243例(男2252例,年龄4～98岁;女991...     

Left bundle branch block associated with propoxyphene hydrochloride poisoning

Described is the case of a patient who developed left bundle branch block following acute propoxyphene hydrochloride overdosage. The left bundle branch block was transient and associated with no permanent sequelae. Previously documented cardiac abnormalities, specific narcotic antagonist therapy, and animal studies correlating cardiac toxicity of propoxyphene hydrochloride with its potent local anesthetic action are discussed.     

Recurrent extensive anterior myocardial infarction with left and right bundle branch block

The diagnosis of myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block is difficult. We report a case of 56‐year‐old man with old extensive anterior myocardial infarction and left bundle branch block (masked each other). The recurrent myocardial infarction indicated right bundle branch block and first‐degree atrioventricular block, making a clear diagnosis of complicated and interesting ECG.     

间歇性左束支阻滞时QRS波形态特点的分析

目的观察12导联动态心电图间歇性完全性左束支阻滞出现前后心电图QRS波群形态改变特点。方法选择2005年1月至2009年3月住院的16158例患者的12导联动态心电图,检出间歇性完全性左束支阻滞16例,占0.9‰,并对完全性左束支阻滞时心电图QRS波群形态改变的特点进行分析。结果①平均QRS电轴:完全性左束支阻滞时33.64±59.77°,正常室内传导时68.36±13.70°,二者比较,p=0.038;②QT间期:完全性左束支阻滞时0.44±0.07s,正常室内传导时0.40±0.08s,二者比较,p<0.001;③V2导联r波振幅:完全性左束支阻滞时0.13±0.08mV,正常室内传导时0.41±0.28mV,p=0.02。结论间歇性完全性左束支阻滞发生率较低,心电图主要特点为QRS电轴左偏,QT间期延长,V2导联r波振幅明显降低或消失,QRS波群总振幅无明显改变,上述特点有助于识别动态心电图中的间歇性完全性左束支阻滞。     

Reversible left bundle branch block induced congestive heart failure. A case report

Intraventricular conduction delay in the form of left bundle branch block plays an important role in the genesis and the progression of congestive hart failure. We report on the clinical course of a patient and the improvement in functional status after the disappearance of left bundle branch block, despite withholding cardiac resynchronization therapy.     

完全性左束支阻滞81例临床分析

目的分析完全性左束支阻滞(CLBBB)病例的临床特点。方法回顾性分析81例完全性左束支阻滞患者的病因、动态心电图、超声心动图、冠状动脉造影结果。结果60岁以上男性43例,占53%。病因以冠心病、高血压、心功能不全多见。本组冠脉造影的28例完全性左束支阻滞患者中确诊为冠心病者16例,占57.14%。超声心动图结果:55%患者心房、心室增大或心房心室同时增大。左室射血分数(LVEF)<50%者22例,占33.8%。动态心电图检查可见左束支阻滞常合并各种类型心律失常。结论完全性左束支阻滞常发生在老年男性患者,常见于器质性心脏病,尤其是冠心病、高血压、扩张型心肌病。完全性左束支阻滞可导致不良的心脏血流动力学效应,导致左心室功能受损。     

Distinct left bundle branch block pattern in ischemic and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND: A high percentage of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy have the electrocardiographic (ECG) pattern of advanced left bundle branch block (LBBB). In the present study we sought to investigate whether patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of ischemic or non-ischemic etiology can be differentiated on the basis of LBBB pattern. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population included 41 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of non-ischemic (NIC) (n=26) or ischemic origin (IC) (n=15) and LBBB on surface ECG. ECG duration and voltage were digitally measured. The presence of notching of S wave in right precordial leads (V1-V3) was not statistically different between the groups. The voltages of precordial leads V2, V3 and the Sigma(V1+V2+V3 voltages) were significantly more prominent in patients with NIC (P=0.002, P<0.001 and P=0.002, respectively). The discriminative power of receiver operating characteristic analysis was best at voltages of V3 of 2100 microV (area under the curve, 0.805; standard error, 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of V3 voltage >2100 microV on surface ECG in the presence of LBBB to identify a cardiomyopathy of non-ischemic origin were 85 and 73%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A single ECG criteria, voltage of lead V3, appears to be a useful parameter to identify patients with dilated cardiomyopathy of ischemic or non-ischemic origin in the presence of advanced LBBB.     

Permanent left bundle branch area pacing in a child with a third‐degree atrioventricular block: A case report

Permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) is a promising physiological pacing technique that has emerged in recent years. However, LBBP is almost exclusively clinically applied in adult patients. The feasibility and safety of the use of LBBP in children have not been well‐assessed. Here, we report the case of a 6‐year‐old child with a third‐degree atrioventricular block after surgical aortic valve replacement who successfully received a permanent LBBP.     

Cardiac resynchronization performed by LBBaP-CRT in patients with cardiac insufficiency and left bundle branch block

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBaP) in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB), and to compare the clinical effects with traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods

Thirty-two patients with dilated cardiomyopathy complicated by cardiac insufficiency and left bundle branch block were divided into CRT group and LBBaP group. Parameters including pacing threshold, R-wave amplitude, pacing impedance and operation time, and X-ray exposure time were recorded. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) were examined by echocardiography. The changes of QRS complex before and after operation were compared.

Results

Compared with CRT group, the LBBaP group spent less time on total operation time and X-ray exposure time and had stable electrode parameters including pacing threshold, R-wave amplitude, and lead impedance after 12-month follow-up. In addition, LBBaP can achieve narrow QRS complex (117.15 ± 9.91) ms immediately than that in CRT group (130.32 ± 12.41) ms. The change of QRS between LBBaP is (50.30 ± 23.79) ms and CRT group is (33.15 ± 20.22) ms. After 6 months' follow-up in LBBaP group, EF was higher than that before operation. Followed up for 12 months after operation, EF and LVEDD in LBBaP group were significantly improved compared with those before operation.

Conclusion

Left bundle branch area pacing is a safe and effective resynchronization method for patients with cardiac insufficiency and asynchronization, which can achieve same clinical effects to CRT.