Adenocarcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct: a case report

OBJECTIVES: To present the clinical presentation, workup, surgical approach, and pathological findings of the first case report of a patient with adenocarcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of the records of a case of adenocarcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma of the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct. METHODS: The clinical presentation, workup, surgical approach, and pathological findings were reviewed. RESULTS: A 51-year-old man presented with a 10-year history of recurrent epiphora of the right eye. At dacryocystorhinostomy a small lesion was visualized within the lumen of the lacrimal sac. A biopsy specimen was consistent with adenocarcinoma. En bloc resection was accomplished using a lateral rhinotomy and medial maxillectomy. The final specimen showed adenocarcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma. The patient was given postoperative radiation therapy. He was free of disease 16 months after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Lacrimal sac tumors should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chronic epiphora. Management of nasolacrimal adenocarcinoma requires complete surgical resection. Radiation treatment in and of itself is not curative but may be useful as adjuvant therapy. Carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma can develop in the lacrimal sac and nasolacrimal duct.     

Transnasal endoscopic medial maxillectomy as the initial oncologic approach to sinonasal neoplasms: the anatomic basis

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate an anatomic basis for endoscopic medial maxillectomy with excision of the lateral nasal wall to the nasal floor, including the inferior turbinate, and nasolacrimal duct. Transnasal endoscopic medial maxillectomy involves complete resection of the lateral nasal wall with boundaries that are inferior to the nasal floor; superior to the cribriform plate and fovea ethmoidalis; anterior to the anterior maxillary wall, including the nasolacrimal duct; and posterior to within 5 mm of the eustachian tube. Transnasal endoscopic medial maxillectomy provides exposure for endoscopic resection of the orbital wall, pterygopalatine fossa, pterygoid plates, nasopharynx, and anterior skull base when indicated. DESIGN: Volumetric analysis of the maxillary sinus was performed on axial and coronal computed tomographic scans of 19 adult patients for a total of 38 maxillary sinuses. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Nineteen adult patients with tumors of the head (but outside the sinonasal region). INTERVENTIONS: Radiographic analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The total volume of the maxillary sinus, volume above and below the superior attachment of the inferior turbinate, and volume anterior to the nasolacrimal duct were measured. RESULTS: The mean (SD) total volume of the maxillary sinus was 20.1 (4.2) cm(3), whereas its volume inferior to the superior attachment of the inferior turbinate was 12.9 (3.7) cm(3) and anterior to the nasolacrimal duct was 1.1 (0.6) cm(3). The mean (SD) volume of the maxillary sinus inferior to the superior attachment of the inferior turbinate was 64% (12%), whereas the nasolacrimal duct obscured the transnasal anterior exposure of the maxillary sinus. CONCLUSION: Without excision of the lateral nasal wall inferiorly to the nasal floor and anteriorly, including the nasolacrimal duct, over half of the maxillary sinus would be inaccessible for procedures directed at neoplasms within the maxillary sinus.     

Nasolacrimal duct obstruction caused by an oncocytoma

We report the case of a woman with epiphora and purulent rhinorrhea for which she initially underwent a dacryocystorhinostomy. The unilateral rhinorrhea was persistent and one year later an oncocytoma of the lacrimal sac with extension to the nasolacrimal duct was diagnosed. Surgical excision of the tumour via a medial maxillectomy was accomplished. Long-term follow-up for 10 years was without evidence of recurrence. To our knowledge only 22 oncocytomas of the lacrimal sac but none involving the duct have so far been reported. In patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction a lacrimal sac or nasolacrimal duct tumour though rare is a possibility and should be kept in mind. The majority of these tumours are malignant and oncocytomas may undergo malignant transformation.     

经鼻内镜上颌窦前、内侧壁切除治疗Krouse Ⅲ型上颌窦内翻性乳头状瘤

目的评价鼻内镜下上颌窦前、内侧壁切除术在治疗KrouseⅢ型上颌窦内翻性乳头状瘤中的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2003~2014年诊断为KrouseⅢ型上颌窦内翻性乳头状瘤患者43例,均在鼻内镜下行上颌窦前、内侧壁切除术,观察分析术后患者的临床疗效。结果经鼻内镜上颌窦前、内侧壁切除术可完全切除上颌窦内乳头状瘤。21例患者行上颌窦内侧壁切除术,22例行上颌窦前、内侧壁切除术。其中26例患者切除鼻泪管,13例患者下鼻甲全或者部分切除。术后所有患者平均随访时间为48个月。3例患者复发,8例患者诉鼻腔干燥,2例患者溢泪,3例患者癌变。结论鼻内镜下上颌窦前、内侧壁切除术治疗上颌窦内翻性乳头状瘤（Krouse III型）安全有效,该手术方式术中提供了良好的手术视野,术后随访利于观察术腔,术后复发率低,可作为治疗上颌窦内翻性乳头状瘤（Krouse III型）的常规手术方式。     

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy. An unusual post-operative finding: re-opening of the nasolacrimal duct.

Endoscopic laser dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a recognized technique for the surgical treatment of epiphora. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction is surgically bypassed by creating a passage from the lacrimal sac to the nasal cavity (rhinostomy). Some patients have undergone endonasal laser-assisted DCR, and were found to have an obstructed rhinostomy at follow-up. However, they reported a subjective improvement in their symptoms. Five such patients, at six months follow-up, were found to have a non-functioning rhinostomy with fluorescein dye emerging from under the inferior turbinate. These five patients along with four controls had post-operative macrodacryocystograms (MDCG) to delineate the anatomical passage by which tears were entering the nasal cavity. In the control group, clear passage of contrast into the middle meatus was demonstrated in three of the four subjects. In the study group, passage of dye to the inferior meatus, via the nasolacrimal duct was demonstrated in four of the five subjects. It is well recognized that a proportion of patients suffering from epiphora will have a natural resolution of their symptoms. Our results demonstrate that the resolution of epiphora in some operated patients was due to a re-opening of the nasolacrimal duct, and not because of a patent rhinostomy.     

Nasolacrimal duct orifice cysts in adults: a previously unrecognized, easily treatable cause of epiphora

BACKGROUND: Epiphora is a common problem evaluated by ophthalmologists and otolaryngologists. It is typically the result of obstruction at some level of the nasolacrimal system, either the canaliculi, sac, or duct. Multiple etiologies exist, including scarring from infection or trauma, tumors, or masses. Cysts of the nasolacrimal duct orifice (dacryocystoceles) in the inferior meatus have been described in neonates, usually presenting as obstructive nasal masses shortly after birth. Nasolacrimal duct orifice cysts have not been described in the adult population in the medical literature. PATIENTS: Three patients were identified with epiphora as a result of cysts in the inferior meatus at the opening of the nasolacrimal duct. All patients presented with constant epiphora and were referred for dacryocystorhinostomy by an ophthalmologist or an otolaryngologist. None of the patients had a previous history of nasolacrimal duct (NLD) surgery. One patient had previous endoscopic sinus surgery for nasal polyps. Cysts were identified by nasal endoscopy of the inferior meatus in all patients. RESULTS: All patients underwent endoscopic resection of the inferior meatus cyst to relieve the obstruction of the NLD. Two procedures were performed under general anesthesia and one under intravenous sedation. All patients had complete relief of epiphora and have had no evidence of recurrence of the symptoms or the cyst in 4 to 10 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: NLD orifice cysts are easily correctable causes of epiphora. Routine inferior meatus endoscopy should be routinely performed in patients with epiphora to identify whether on not this pathology is present prior to performing dacryocystorhinostomy.     

Outcomes of posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: review of 35 cases

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to describe the posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) performed at our institute and report perioperative results achieved with this procedure. METHODS: A prospective clinical study was performed of 35 adult patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction who underwent posterior lacrimal sac approach DCR from March 1998 to May 2005. Follow-up period ranged from 13 to 30 months (average, 17.5 months; SD, 6.8 months). "Surgical success" was defined as complete relief of epiphora and patent surgical ostium on endoscopic assessment. RESULTS: Surgical success was achieved in 30/35 (85.7%) patients after the primary surgery. Of 5 unsuccessful patients who complained of occasional epiphora, 4 patients had formed stenosis and 1 patient had granulation around the surgical opening, and all had revision surgery. Four of 5 (80.0%) patients achieved surgical success. Thus, including the result of revision surgery, 34/35 (97.1%) patients were successful. CONCLUSION: Posterior lacrimal sac approach in endoscopic DCR has several advantages: good sac accessibility, a low complication rate, and a relatively high success rate. Therefore, the posterior lacrimal sac approach appears to offer a useful alternative approach for the surgical treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.     

Nasolacrimal obstruction after maxillary sinus and rhinoplastic surgery.

Transient nasolacrimal obstruction is a common complication of maxillary sinus, as well as rhinoplastic surgery. Permanent epiphora, however, is unusual. This communication describes 11 patients with surgical injury to the lacrimal drainage system, which necessitated dacryocystorhinostomy for correction. Seven of these cases occurred subsequent to nasoantral window procedures, three occurred after rhinoplasty, and one resulted from a partial maxillectomy. It has been shown that the two areas most vulnerable to inadvertent surgical injury are the nasolacrimal sac, located just beneath the medial canthal ligament, and the ductal ostium in the inferior meatus. We discuss the relevant anatomy of the nasolacrimal apparatus, in addition to surgical methods for avoiding injury to the system. We also describe the currently applied techniques for diagnosing and managing lacrimal obstruction and review the literature.     

Long-term follow-up of patients with microscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy

BACKGROUND: Stenosis of the nasolacrimal drainage system is a relatively frequent complication of acute or chronic inflammation, trauma, tumor, or congenital malformation. Symptoms include epiphora, intermittent purulent secretion, and swelling of the nasolacrimal sac. The principle of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is to create an artificial opening of the lacrimal sac into the nasal cavity. This can be done via an external as well as an endonasal route. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined 74 microscopic endonasal DCRs. which were performed on 70 patients between 1990 and 2000. All of the 74 DCR operations had no major complications intraoperatively. RESULTS: Sixty DCR procedures (81.1%) were successful after a mean follow-up time of 3.18 years. This success rate is lower than those rates reported in the literature for the external approach, which range between 85 and 99%, although follow-up times were shorter in most of these studies. CONCLUSIONS: Advantages of the endonasal approach such as saving the medial palpebral ligament, the lacrimal pump mechanism, and the horizontal apparatus are obvious. If necessary, additional management of sinus, septal, and conchal disease can be performed simultaneously. Our results reveal that the microscopic endonasal approach is a safe and reliable procedure in the management of postsaccular or saccular nasolacrimal duct obstruction and is an alternative to the traditional external route.     

Manometric measurement of lacrimal sac pressure after endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) using a quantitative, objective functional tool. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study comprised 58 cases divided into 4 groups: healthy controls; patients suffering from epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction; patients who had undergone endoscopic DCR; and patients who had undergone external DCR. The lacrimal sac pressure was measured during blinking, forced blinking and the Valsalva maneuver using a polygraph. RESULTS: Negative pressure was detected during blinking and forced blinking in all normal subjects and in most patients who had successfully undergone DCR. In contrast, positive pressure was detected in cases with epiphora and patients in whom DCR had failed. Negative pressure was higher after endoscopic than external DCR. During the Valsalva maneuver there were no pressure changes in normal cases and patients with epiphora. In contrast, positive pressure was detected after all of the successful procedures (being higher after external than endoscopic DCR) and in most of the patients in whom external DCR failed. CONCLUSIONS: In normal subjects, negative pressure is created during blinking. In cases with epiphora due to NLD obstruction, the lacrimal pump is affected but its function is restored after successful DCR. The suction power of the pump mechanism is more effective after endoscopic than external DCR.     

Otologic T-tube in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: a new approach

CONCLUSION: Otologic T-tubes had a success rate of 73% if implanted during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). We suggest that they can be used successfully in endoscopic DCR, and are promising as an alternative to silicone stent intubations. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic DCR using otologic T-tube. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (22 eyes) with nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent endoscopic DCR. After creating an aperture in the medial wall of the lacrimal sac, the otologic T-tube (1.15 mm diameter, Invotec, Jacksonville, FL, USA) was inserted into the sac transnasally. The T-tube was left in the lacrimal sac for between 3 and 6 months. The patients were followed up for between 6 and 24 months (mean 12.4 months). The improvement in patients' epiphora complaint was grouped as very good, good, or no change. RESULTS: Eleven eyes (50%) proved to be 'very good', whereas five eyes (23%) were good, and six eyes (27%) had no change. Of six eyes that were reported to have no change after the operation, three experienced spontaneous tube loss in the early period, one eye was a recurrent case, and the other two were primary cases.     

Long-term results and reasons for failure of intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and the factors influencing the success in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and silicone tube intubation (STI). We prospectively investigated 158 patients with lacrimal obstruction in two groups, one of which comprised 108 patients treated primarily with intranasal endoscopic DCR by experienced surgeons and the other comprised 50 patients who were operated on by inexperienced surgeons. In a mean follow-up time of 49 months the surgical success was 94.4% in experienced hands and 58.0% in inexperienced hands. The endoscopic examination of six patients with failure in the first group revealed granulation tissue around the tube in four, atonic sac in one and persistence of bone that was supposed to have been excised in the nasal cavity in one. There were 21 failures out of 50 patients in the second group: granulation tissue in 2 cases, fenestration to the nasolacrimal duct instead of the sac in 6 cases, synechia between the lateral nasal wall and the middle turbinate in 2 cases, bony spicles causing obstruction in 5 cases and fenestration anterior to the sac in 2 cases. In 4 cases no reasons were found for failure, but perhaps the small fenestration and failure to remove the medial half of the membranous sac wall was the reason. DCR and STI can be performed for primary treatment in lacrimal obstruction. There is a learning curve for the operation. False localization of the lacrimal sac, granulation tissue formation around the tubes, retained bony spicles, inadequate removal of the medial wall of the sac and the synechia between the lateral wall and the middle turbinate are the most common causes of failure.     

Long-term Results and Reasons for Failure of Intranasal Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results and the factors influencing the success in patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction treated with intranasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) and silicone tube intubation (STI). We prospectively investigated 158 patients with lacrimal obstruction in two groups, one of which comprised 108 patients treated primarily with intranasal endoscopic DCR by experienced surgeons and the other comprised 50 patients who were operated on by inexperienced surgeons. In a mean follow-up time of 49 months the surgical success was 94.4% in experienced hands and 58.0% in inexperienced hands. The endoscopic examination of six patients with failure in the first group revealed granulation tissue around the tube in four, atonic sac in one and persistence of bone that was supposed to have been excised in the nasal cavity in one. There were 21 failures out of 50 patients in the second group: granulation tissue in 2 cases, fenestration to the nasolacrimal duct instead of the sac in 6 cases, synechia between the lateral nasal wall and the middle turbinate in 2 cases, bony spicles causing obstruction in 5 cases and fenestration anterior to the sac in 2 cases. In 4 cases no reasons were found for failure, but perhaps the small fenestration and failure to remove the medial half of the membranous sac wall was the reason. DCR and STI can be performed for primary treatment in lacrimal obstruction. There is a learning curve for the operation. False localization of the lacrimal sac, granulation tissue formation around the tubes, retained bony spicles, inadequate removal of the medial wall of the sac and the synechia between the lateral wall and the middle turbinate are the most common causes of failure.     

Outcomes after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) without the preservation of mucosal flaps for the management of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing endoscopic DCR without mucosal flap preservation from May 2003 to October 2006 at a tertiary referral medical center. Twenty-seven procedures were performed on 20 patients with epiphora secondary to acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Main outcome measures were subjective improvement in epiphora and assessment of anatomic patency based on lacrimal irrigation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 16 months. Mild intermittent postoperative epiphora or complete resolution of epiphora was noted in 100% (27/27) of procedures; complete resolution was recorded in 93% (25/27) of procedures. Eighteen patients (25 procedures) were available for lacrimal irrigation at a mean of 16 months follow-up. Anatomic patency was confirmed in 100% (25/25) of procedures. CONCLUSION: Our results with endoscopic DCR are comparable with previously published outcomes. These data suggest that successfully powered DCR may be performed without the preservation of mucosal flaps.     

Anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is a well-established alternative to external approaches in the treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstruction. From July 2004 to December 2008, 92 endoscopic DCRs were performed on 88 patients at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. All patients were affected by chronic dacryocystitis with epiphora. Preoperative work-up included Jones tests, lacrimal pathways irrigation, nasal endoscopy, and imaging evaluation by computed tomography. The technique involved anastomosis of nasal mucosal, lacrimal sac flaps and a large bony ostium. A silicone tube was inserted in all patients that remained for a period of 3 months. The first endoscopic intervention was successful in 91.30% of patients. After a second revision endoscopic DCR, the overall success rate raised to 95.65%. Anastomosis of nasal mucosal between lacrimal sac flaps plays a key role in endoscopic DCR with a high success rate both in primary nasolacrimal obstructions and in revision cases.     

Manometric Measurement of Lacrimal Sac Pressure after Endoscopic and External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Objective—To evaluate endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) using a quantitative, objective functional tool. Material and methods—This study comprised 58 cases divided into 4 groups: healthy controls; patients suffering from epiphora due to nasolacrimal duct (NLD) obstruction; patients who had undergone endoscopic DCR; and patients who had undergone external DCR. The lacrimal sac pressure was measured during blinking, forced blinking and the Valsalva maneuver using a polygraph. Results—Negative pressure was detected during blinking and forced blinking in all normal subjects and in most patients who had successfully undergone DCR. In contrast, positive pressure was detected in cases with epiphora and patients in whom DCR had failed. Negative pressure was higher after endoscopic than external DCR. During the Valsalva maneuver there were no pressure changes in normal cases and patients with epiphora. In contrast, positive pressure was detected after all of the successful procedures (being higher after external than endoscopic DCR) and in most of the patients in whom external DCR failed. Conclusions—In normal subjects, negative pressure is created during blinking. In cases with epiphora due to NLD obstruction, the lacrimal pump is affected but its function is restored after successful DCR. The suction power of the pump mechanism is more effective after endoscopic than external DCR.     

Outcomes of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy after maxillectomy in patients with paranasal sinus and skull base tumors

Maxillectomy followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy can result in lacrimal blockage and the need for subsequent dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Endonasal endoscopic DCR, as opposed to external DCR, allows better accuracy and leaves no scar. To date no report was published regarding the results of endoscopic DCR in these patients. The current study presents a retrospective review of all patients with paranasal and skull base tumors who developed nasolacrimal duct blockage after ablative maxillectomy with or without radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy and underwent endonasal endoscopic DCR between January 2006 and October 2012 in a tertiary reference medical center. According to our results, ten patients underwent 11 subsequent endonasal endoscopic DCR. There were 6 men and 4 women with a median age of 55 years (range, 19–81 years); four suffered from benign tumors and six had malignant tumors. All underwent maxillectomy. Six received high-dose radiotherapy. Time interval between primary ablative surgery and endonasal endoscopic DCR was 18 months (range, 7–118 months). Silicone stents were removed after median period of 11 weeks (range, 1–57 weeks). Nine out of ten patients experienced symptomatic improvement following one endonasal endoscopic DCR. One patient had recurrent epiphora and underwent a successful endonasal endoscopic revision DCR. In conclusion, endonasal endoscopic DCR in patients with paranasal and skull base tumors, who previously underwent maxillectomy, is generally successful and not associated with a high rate of complications or failure. Moreover, our findings may suggest that silicone stents can be removed shortly after the operation with high success rate.     

Primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children -- analysis of 18 patients

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique and results of primary endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children with nasolacrimal duct blockage and review of literature with comparison of the results in adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out between the months of January 2002 to December 2004, which included 18 patients. Patients diagnosed as having only nasolacrimal duct obstruction were included in this study and an endonasal endoscopic procedure was performed. RESULTS: Eighteen children underwent endoscopic the DCR procedure. There were 5 males (27.7%) and 13 females (72.3%) with the maximum incidence between the age group of 4-7 years (age ranging from 10 months to 11.2 years). The follow up period ranged from 6 to 19 months average being 8.2 months. Relief of symptoms and endoscopic visualization of the patent stoma made into the lacrimal sac with sac syringing determined a successful outcome. Seventeen patients (94.4%) fulfilled the criteria. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that endonasal endoscopic DCR without stenting offers the same success rates for primary surgery over external DCR as have been established in adults. Moreover, it has an added advantage of shorter operative time, less morbidity and avoidance of stent related complications.     

Nasolacrimal obstruction after inferior meatus nasal antrostomy

Transient epiphora following rhinoplasty or intranasal procedures is a common occurrence. Permanent nasolacrimal duct obstruction, however, is rare. This article documents four cases of nasolacrimal duct obstruction following intranasal antrostomy. Three patients were cured by dacryocystorhinostomy and a fourth refused surgery. The anatomy of the nasolacrimal duct in the inferior meatus has considerable variation. Although the duct typically opens in the inferior meatus immediately under the insertion of the inferior turbinate, the orifice can be a single hole, a slit, multiple holes, or a trough, and can be located anywhere from 30 to 40 mm dorsal to the anterior nares. We review the embryology and anatomy of the nasolacrimal orifice in the nose and make recommendations for safe surgery in the inferior meatus.     

Modified transnasal endoscopic medial maxillectomy with medial shift of preserved inferior turbinate and nasolacrimal duct

Although transnasal endoscopic medial maxillectomy (TEMM) is effective for the treatment of inverted papilloma (IP) in maxillary sinus (MS), it involves resection of the inferior turbinate (IT). TEMM also involves resection of the nasolacrimal duct (ND) in many cases to gain better access. Therefore, we developed a novel procedure in which the preserved IT and ND are shifted medially for a complete resection of IP in the MS. Incision was made in the mucosa of the lateral wall along the anterior margin of the IT. After removal of the medial maxillary wall except the ND and the lateral nasal mucosa, the anterior lateral mucosa of the nose, including the IT and the ND, was shifted in the medial direction to allow wider access to the MS. The tumor was removed together with the attachment through the anterior side of the ND. This modified TEMM was performed in 10 patients with IP. The IT and ND were preserved in all patients. We have not observed epiphora after this surgery. The advantages of the novel approach presented herein include: 1) preservation of the IT, ND, and lateral nasal mucosa; 2) wide access to the MS by shifting the IT, ND, and lateral nasal mucosa in the medial direction; and 3) direct access to the MS through anterior space of the ND, resulting in easier operation with a straight endoscope and instruments. This approach is a safe and effective method to obtain wide and straight access to the MS and to resect IP in the MS.