专科护士执业二级准入制度规范化培训体会

对护理人员进行系统培训是时代发展的需求,也是在竞争日益激烈的今天医院生存的需要,更是护理专业和护士个人学习成长的需要[1].目前我国护士执业资质考试采取的仅仅是理论考试,在实际工作中发现,有相当一部护士在取得了执业证书,工作了两三年后,其实际执业能力远达不到临床护理实际工作能力需要,尤其面对专科护理岗位的严格要求,常由于个人业务不熟练、实践能力差、缺乏工作经验等因素受到病人投诉或引起纠纷,构成一定的护理安全隐患.为解决这一问题,我院自2007年2月起制定了专科护士执业二级准入管理制度,将取得国家护士执业证书的一定年资护士在专科护理岗位执业前的培训、考核、发放执业上岗证等工作进一步规范化,效果较好.现报告如下.     

Client characteristics and practice patterns of nurse practitioners and physicians

This study's purpose was to describe the practice patterns of nurse practitioners (NPs) in Tennessee--specifically, the demographic characteristics and health problems of their clients and the therapeutic services they provide. A random sample of NPs practicing 20 or more hours per week in primary care in Tennessee provided data on a total of 680 clients seen during one selected day of care. An instrument adapted from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) allowed comparison of the NP findings with a national survey of office-based physicians in five areas: client demographics, client health status, diagnostic tests ordered, therapeutic interventions provided, and client disposition. Although many similarities were seen, differences included the tendency of NPs to care for more younger and female clients, to perform fewer office surgical procedures, and to provide more health teaching/counseling interventions.     

Collaboration between pharmacists,physicians and nurse practitioners: A qualitative investigation of working relationships in the inpatient medical setting

While collaborative, team-based care has the potential to improve medication use and reduce adverse drug events and cost, less attention is paid to understanding the processes of well functioning teams. This paper presents the findings from key informant interviews and reflective journaling from pharmacists, physicians and nurse practitioners participating in a multicentre, controlled clinical trial of team-based pharmacist care in hospitalized medical patients. A phenomenological approach guided the data analysis and content analysis was the primary tool for unitizing, categorizing and identifying emerging themes. Pharmacists experienced highs (developing trusting relationships and making positive contributions to patient care) and lows (struggling with documentation and workload) during integration into the medical care team. From the perspective of the participating pharmacists, nurse practitioners and physicians, the integration of pharmacists into the teams was felt to have facilitated positive patient outcomes by improving team drug-therapy decision-making, continuity of care and patient safety. Additionally, the study increased the awareness of all team members' potential roles so that pharmacists, nurses and physicians could play a part in and benefit from working together as a team. Focussed attention on how practice is structured, team process and ongoing support would enable successful implementation of team-based care in a larger context. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00351676)     

Perceptions of physicians, nurses, and respiratory therapists about the role of acute care nurse practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Information about the contributions of acute care nurse practitioners to medical management teams in critical care settings is limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine contributions of acute care nurse practitioners to medical management of critically ill patients from the perspectives of 3 disciplines: medicine, respiratory care, and nursing. METHODS: Attending physicians, respiratory therapists, and nurses in 2 intensive care units were asked to list 3 advantages and 3 disadvantages of collaborative care provided by acute care nurse practitioners. Qualitative methods (coding/constant comparative analysis) were used to identify common themes and subthemes. Overall response rate was 35% (from 69% for attending physicians to 26% for nurses). RESULTS: Responses were grouped into 4 main themes: accessibility, competence/knowledge, care coordination/communication, and system issues. Acute care nurse practitioners were valued for their accessibility, expertise in routine daily management of patients, and ability to meet patient/family needs, especially for "long-stay" patients. Also, they were respected for their commitment to providing quality care and for their communication skills, exemplified through teaching of nursing staff, patient/family involvement, and fluency in weaning protocols. Physicians valued acute care nurse practitioners' continuity of care, patient/family focus, and commitment. Nurses valued their accessibility, commitment, and patient/family focus. Respiratory therapists valued their accessibility, commitment, and consistency in implementing weaning protocols. CONCLUSION: Responses reflected unique advantages of acute care nurse practitioners as members of medical management teams in critical care settings. Despite perceptions of the acute care nurse practitioner's role as medically oriented, the themes reflect a clear nursing focus.     

Findings of a training needs analysis for qualified nurse practitioners

Training needs analyses have been identified as an essential part in the development of continuing education programmes and their implementation into practice This study describes the results of a training needs analysis of nurse practitioners across three health authorities in England     

Roles of nurse practitioners and family physicians in community health centres

Objective

To describe the models of practice used by nurse practitioners (NPs) and FPs in community health centres (CHCs), and to examine the roles of NPs and FPs in these models.

Design

Cross-sectional study using an organizational survey completed by managers of the CHC sites, as well as administrative data on patient sociodemographic characteristics and encounter activities.

Setting

A total of 21 CHCs (13 main sites and 8 satellite sites) operating in eastern Ontario during the period from December 1, 2006, to November 30, 2008.

Participants

A total of 44 849 patients, 53 full-time equivalent FPs, and 41 full-time equivalent NPs.

Main outcome measures

Family physicians’ and NPs’ models of practice, the sociodemographic characteristics and medical profiles of patients who were treated in each model of practice, and FPs’ and NPs’ use of time.

Results

Patients were attributed to 1 of 3 models of practice in CHCs based on the proportion of visits to FPs and NPs: FP care (53% of patients), NP care (29%), and shared care (18%). Patients who received care in the NP model of practice were younger and more likely to be female, be homeless, and not have postsecondary education. Patients who received care in the FP model of practice had more complex medical conditions (cardiovascular disease, mental illness, lung disease, and diabetes) and more annual visits. Patients who received care in the shared care model had intermediate profiles. Nurse practitioners performed more off-site care and walk-in visits. Family physicians and NPs spent a similar proportion of time performing various duties such as direct clinical care and administration tasks.

Conclusion

Although NPs mainly cared for their own patient panels (in the NP care model), they did share some patients with FPs and provide some care to patients under the FP model of practice. Patients who were cared for by FPs and NPs had quite different characteristics.     

Interactional styles of nurse practitioners and physicians regarding patient decision making

The purpose of this study was to describe interactional styles used by nurse practitioners and physicians in their attempts to influence patients' decision making. The ethical concepts of paternalism, maternalism, and shared decision making (operationalized as command, consequence, and concordance, respectively) formed the conceptual framework for the analysis of the interactions. Videotaped interactions of 85 physicians and 42 nurse practitioners in either joint or solo practice were analyzed. Tests of a priori hypotheses using hierarchical log-linear modeling yielded the following significant results: Males and physicians in solo practice used more command statements and fewer consequence statements than females and nurse practitioners in solo practice, who used fewer command statements and more consequence statements. All groups used more command/consequence statements than concordance statements.     

Who wants to work in geriatrics: Findings from a national survey of physicians and nurse practitioners

BackgroundAs the United States population is aging, there is a chronic shortage of geriatrics- and gerontology- trained clinicians despite a variety of incentives. With primary care clinicians also in short supply, health systems are trying to cope with the increasing demand for care for older adultsPurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine respondents' willingness to recommend their career to others and beliefs about changes necessary to enhance the supply of appropriately prepared cliniciansMethodsThis study used a national survey of a stratified sample of 276 physicians and 134 nurse practitioners working in primary care and geriatric practices.FindingsAmong nurse practitioner respondents, 29% would "definitely" recommend a career as a geriatrician vs. seventeen percent of physicians; thirteen percent of physicians would "definitely" recommend a career as a nurse practitioner specializing in adult/gerontology vs. 42% for nurse practitioners. Those trained in geriatrics were more likely to recommend a career in the field.DiscussionNurse practitioners and physicians differ in their willingness to recommend careers in in gerontology and geriatrics, but less than a majority would strongly recommend careers in either specialty. Based on clinical reports, substantial reforms in payment and reimbursement for services may be necessary to bolster the geriatric field's attractiveness, and better prepare the workforce to care for older adults.     

Integrating physiotherapists within primary health care teams: perspectives of family physicians and nurse practitioners

Abstract

The international literature suggests a number of benefits related to integrating physiotherapists into primary health care (PHC) teams. Considering the mandate of PHC teams in Canada, emphasizing healthy living and chronic disease management, a broad range of providers, inclusive of physiotherapists is required. However, physiotherapists are only sparsely integrated into these teams. This study explores the perspectives of “core” PHC team members, family physicians and nurse practitioners, regarding the integration of physiotherapists within Ontario (Canada) PHC teams. Twenty individual semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, transcribed verbatim, and then analyzed following an iterative process drawing from an interpretive phenomenological approach. Five key themes emerged which highlighted “how physiotherapists could and do contribute as team members within PHC teams particularly related to musculoskeletal health and chronic disease management”. The perceived value of physiotherapists within Ontario, Canada PHC teams was a unanimous sentiment particularly in terms of musculoskeletal health, chronic disease management and maximizing health human resources efficiency to ensure the right care, is delivered by the right practitioner, at the right time.     

Quality of nursing home care: perceptions of physicians, psychologists, and nurse practitioners

Physicians, psychologists, and nurse practitioners rated the quality of nursing home care and the importance and feasibility of improvement strategies. Overall care was rated better than care of residents, followed by treatment of staff. Physicians rated care highest and nurse practitioners rated it lowest. In terms of suggestions for quality improvement, improving treatment of frontline staff and of families was rated as most important overall. We found differences across professional groups in recommended improvements, a finding that suggests the importance of interdisciplinary communication and developing an integrated viewpoint in optimizing care for older persons.     

Nurse practitioners and physicians: a collaborative practice

The rapid evolution of health care delivery within the United States has created increased opportunities for nurse practitioners (NPs) to work in a variety of challenging advanced practice roles and to impact the quality of health care. The NP role was originally developed to meet a perceived shortage of primary care physicians, especially for underserved populations. Today, NPs work in various fields, such as geriatrics and women's and family health care, as well as in various systems such as private practice and health maintenance organizations. Effective collaboration with physician colleagues will promote improved communication, health care management, and positive health outcomes. Barriers to effective collaboration are reimbursement, territorialism, and role confusion on part of the health care team and the general public.