Choledochoscopy: are stones missed? A controlled study

Although the choledochoscope has been available for several years, its use had not achieved universal acceptance. Enthusiasts claim that the incidence of retained stones in the common bile duct would be reduced by using the instrument, but no controlled study by the same team has been reported. Patients undergoing biliary surgery by one surgical team in Southampton were operated upon in one of three hospitals. The choledochoscope was available for use at only one hospital, but the other two were otherwise fully equipped, and no selection of patients was made for any particular hospital. Over a period of 7 years, 707 patients underwent elective or emergency cholecystectomy. Routine choledochography was performed and stones were found or suspected in the bile ducts in 103 (14.6 per cent). The choledochoscope was used in 54 of the bile duct explorations and in 10 patients residual calculi following routine exploration were identified by the instrument. Postoperative T-tube choledochography was performed in 35 patients following choledochoscopy, 31 with choledocholithiasis at operation, and no unsuspected retained stones were demonstrated. In the 49 patients undergoing duct exploration by the same team without the choledochoscope, 32 were found to have choledocholithiasis. Thirty-six postoperative choledochograms were performed and six patients were found to have retained stones. There were no additional complications attributed to the use of the instrument. We conclude that the use of the choledochoscope should reduce the incidence of retained bile duct stones.     

Impact of choledochoscopy on the management of choledocholithiasis. Experience with 499 common duct explorations at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

This report summarizes the experience with 144 choledochoscopic examinations performed in the course of 499 common bile duct explorations for stones. Routine choledochoscopy added 15--20 minutes to the operation and caused no complications. In 24% of the patients, additional stones were discovered with the choledochoscope after completion of routine bile duct exploration. In spite of this, the incidence of retained stones found postoperatively remained 4%, with or without choledochoscopy. The factors contributing to the failure of choledochoscopy, thus far, to prevent all retained stones are identified as inexperience of surgeons learning to perform biliary endoscopy, failure to scan the biliary tree systematically and thoroughly (including the left hepatic duct), and failure to reach the duodenum with the choledochoscope, meaning failure to see the lower segment of the common duct and ampullary orifice. With a modicum of experience and attention to detail, it should be possible to reduce considerably further the number of retained stones.     

Choledochoscopy in prevention of retained common bile duct stones

More than 150,000 patients undergo exploration of the common bile duct each year in the United States, and approximately 10 per cent of these patients are later found to have retained common bile duct stones. The usual recommended procedure to decrease the incidence of retained calculi is a more complete exploration of the common duct at time of initial operation. It is thought that the incidence of retained common bile duct stones can be decreased and almost eliminated with proper use of the flexible choledochoscope following intraoperative cystic duct cholangiogram. The technical aspects of choledochoscopy are reviewed and experience with its use in 102 cases between July 1978 and October 1985 is reported. There were no residual stones in the span of the study using the flexible choledochoscope as a routine procedure in common bile duct exploration.     

Experience with the Flexible Fiberoptic Choledochoscope

Despite significant effort on the part of surgeons, the incidence of retained calculi after common duct exploration still remains unacceptably high. It seems likely that the best way to reduce the incidence of retained calculi would be a more complete exploration of the common duct at the time of the initial operation. We report our experience with a flexible fiber optic endoscope used intraoperatively in 52 patients and postoperatively in one case to visualize the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. In addition to visualization of stones, the choledochoscope has a channel through which various instruments can be passed to facilitate stone removal. Flexible choledochoscopy has been performed 53 times in 52 patients between July 1978 and November 1980. In one patient, the choledochoscope was used to explore the bile ducts via the T-tube tract after operation. In 52 patients, the scope was used intraoperatively: a) two patients demonstrated bile duct tumors, b) in 14, stones were not found on exploration. Of these, one had stenosis at the papilla of Vater and one had external compression of the duct by a pancreatic pseudocyst. All of these findings were confirmed by choledochoscopy, c) in 26 patients choledochoscopy confirmed complete surgical removal of all stones, d) in six patients, multiple stones were removed using routine common duct exploration but additional stones were seen with the choledochoscope, e) in three patients no stones were retrieved on routine duct exploration but were seen using the choledochoscope. In groups (d) and (e) the scope facilitated removal of the remaining stones. In eight cases stones were either grasped or crushed using the accessories of the choledochoscope. In one patient calculi were missed both by routine surgical exploration and choledochoscopy. No septic complications were seen in any of these patients.     

Technic for finding and removing stones from intrahepatic bile ducts

Intrahepatic biliary calculi which were missed by routine common duct exploration were discovered by choledochoscopy in the left hepatic ducts of three patients. Removal of stones was accomplished in two of these patients by using instruments for stone extraction under direct vision with the choledochoscope. The use of a Fogarty balloon catheter threaded through the choledochoscope is particularly recommended.     

Intraoperative flexible choledochoscopy for intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary calculi

This prospective study evaluates the use of intraoperative flexible choledochoscopy in the detection and removal of additional stones after conventional bile duct exploration. The biliary system of 109 patients was examined with an Olympus CHF-B4 choledochoscope after conventional methods of exploration. Sixty-five patients had only common duct stones and 44 patients had intrahepatic stones with or without stones in the common duct. Additional stones were detected in 11 patients (16.9%) in the group with common duct stones; eight of these patients had their stones completely removed. Unsuspected residual stones were discovered by means of postoperative cholangiography in three more patients (4.6%); thus the total number of patients with residual stones was six (9.2%). Additional stones were detected in 39 patients (88.6%) in the group with intrahepatic stones. Of these, only 13 patients managed to be freed of stones with the use of the choledochoscope. A further 10 patients underwent liver resection to achieve stone clearance. Unsuspected retained stones were found postoperatively in seven of the 28 patients (25%) whose biliary systems were considered clear of stones. The overall number of patients with retained stones in the group with intrahepatic stones was 23 (52.3%). We concluded that intraoperative flexible choledochoscopy is useful in detecting intrahepatic stones left behind after conventional exploration. However, complete removal of the stones is difficult to achieve.     

Choledochoscopy as a complementary procedure to operative cholangiography in biliary surgery

Six years' experience with the use of the flexible choledochoscope for biliary surgery is reported. One hundred forty-nine patients underwent common bile duct exploration with choledochoscopy as a complementary procedure. Choledochoscopy immediately showed the absence of stones in 37 patients in whom stones were suspected but the results of preexploratory operative cholangiography were negative or equivocal. The remaining 112 patients underwent choledocholithotomy with choledochoscopy. Only two patients (1.3 percent) returned with unsuspected residual stones.Choledochoscopy used as a complementary procedure to operative cholangiography can easily and more accurately clarify suspicious findings in the operative cholangiogram. It avoids the use of blind instrumental exploration of the bile ducts. Impacted stones can be extracted easily under direct vision with the choledochoscope. We believe that the use of choledochoscopy contributed to our low incidence of retained stones.     

Operative choledochoscopy : Results of a prospective study in several institutions

A prospective study from six surgical units utilizing choledochoscopy in conjunction with primary choledocholithotomy and cholangiography resulted in an incidence of less than 2 per cent unsuspected residual biliary calculi. Total reliance on choledochoscopy without associated operative cholangiography is not justified and fraught with error. When there are no calculi in the common duct, the choledochoscope allows the surgeon to shorten exploration time with confidence that the postexploratory cholangiogram will confirm his negative findings. The choledochoscope is of additional value in the extraction of calculi. Certain considerations in the management of biliary tract tumors also can be helped by the addition of choledochoscopy. The simultaneous presence of calculous disease and biliary tract neoplasm can coexist can be brought to light by the use of the choledochoscope. The incorporation of choledochoscopy, using a rigid Berci-Shore choledochoscope, as part of routine common duct exploration, appears to be warranted.     

Operative common bile duct imaging by operative cholangiography and flexible choledochoscopy.

A consecutive series of 108 common bile duct (CBD) explorations was studied to examine the efficacy of routine operative cholangiography and flexible choledochoscopy in the identification of choledocholithiasis. CBD exploration was performed according to the findings of routine operative cholangiography. Nine negative explorations were performed, only one of which would have been avoided had selective cholangiography been employed. Eight patients had unsuspected choledocholithiasis that would have been missed if selective operative cholangiography had been used. Flexible choledochoscopy identified CBD stones on 97 occasions; no additional retained stones were found on subsequent T tube cholangiography. In two cases stones were seen but could not be removed; immediate identification allowed planning for early removal. Flexible choledochoscopy is the most effective method of CBD exploration and should be used in all patients with suspected choledocholithiasis.     

Choledochoscopy in common bile duct surgery for choledocholithiasis: A must: Eight years experience in 441 consecutive patients

Between 1975 and 1983, 441 choledochoscopy were performed in a series of 451 consecutive patients undergoing surgical common biliary duct exploration for choledocholithiasis. In 127 patients (27.8%), no stones were found. Forty-five cases (10%) of choledocholithiasis missed by surgical and radiologic exploration methods were found by choledochoscopy. Therefore the retained stone rate decreased from 10 per cent to 2 per cent. Fourteen patients (3%) died at surgery, ten of whom (2%) were over 70. Postoperative biliary tract was drained in 98 patients (8%) using external drainage. Biliary tract patency was checked on the tenth postoperative day by the tube cholangiography. When retained stones were not found, T-tube was removed on the 20th day after surgery. When retained stones were found (11 patients, 2%) an endoscopic papillotomy was performed. Choledochoscopy is a significant addition in biliary surgery. It reduces operative mortality and morbidity, decreases retained stone rate, diminishes indications for biliary anastomosis and sphincterotomy, and is easy to perform without specific training. Its extensive and systematic use is advocated when- ever common bile duct patency has to be surgically demonstrated in choledocholithiasis.     

Use of Rigid Nephroscope for Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration—A Single-Center Experience

Background  

Increasingly, laparoscopic biliary surgeons are undertaking laparoscopic cholecystectomy and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. In laparoscopic common bile duct exploration a flexible choledochoscope is ordinarily used, and with this instrument the surgeon usually fails to remove large impacted stones. In contrast with use of a rigid nephroscope it is possible to remove all common bile duct stones irrespective of size and degree of impaction. The present study evaluates the efficiency of rigid nephroscope for managing common bile duct stones laparoscopically.     

Extent of choledochoscopic utilization in common bile duct exploration

Various reports have demonstrated that the intraoperative utilization of the choledochoscope has significantly reduced the incidence of unsuspected retained common duct stones from approximately 10 percent to 0 to 2 percent. Our series revealed a 4 percent incidence of retained stones before choledochoscopy was utilized. This incidence was reduced to 1.1 percent after it was employed. Since the availability of the choledochoscope is unknown, all hospitals in Alabama with 60 or more beds (total of 86) were surveyed to determine the rate of choledochoscopic utilization. Although this instrument was noted to be readily available in many of those institutions with greater than 150 beds (47 percent), only 25 (29 percent) of all the hospitals surveyed had the choledochoscope. Furthermore, only 17 (20 percent) of all hospitals used the instrument routinely for common duct exploration. Although the rate of retained common bile duct stones in Alabama is unknown, it is probably similar to the 10 percent average reported. Consequently, it is believed that wider acceptance of the choledochoscope will reduce the incidence and associated morbidity of retained common bile duct stones.     

Choledochoscopy and common bile duct exploration

Common bile duct (CBD) exploration is often indicated when cholecystectomy is performed for gallstone disease. Choledochoscopy may help to decrease the incidence of retained common duct stones. The present study reviews 97 consecutive CBD exploration cases performed between 1980 and 1988, in order to evaluate the authors' experience with flexible choledochoscopy and CBD exploration. Fifty-nine patients had CBD exploration plus flexible choledochoscopy and 38 underwent CBD exploration alone. Retained stones were found postoperatively in ten per cent of the patients who had only CBD exploration versus four per cent in the choledochoscopy group. The retained stones in five patients were later removed by percutaneous basket retrieval (3), flush irrigation (1), and choledochoscopy (1). Flexible choledochoscopy detected additional stones after routine CBD exploration in 12 patients, clarified T-tube cholangiograms in four patients, and aided stone extraction in two patients. For these reasons, and because choledochoscopy was associated with a lower incidence of retained stones, the authors believe this procedure is a worthwhile addition in most cases of CBD exploration.     

硬质胆镜与纤维胆道镜治疗胆管结石的临床优势比较

目的:探讨硬质胆镜与纤维胆道镜在腹腔镜胆总管探查术中治疗胆管结石的应用价值。方法:将86例确诊的胆管结石患者随机分为硬质胆镜组和纤维胆道镜组2组,分别行腹腔镜联合硬质胆镜和纤维胆道镜胆总管探查治疗,比较2组患者不同胆管部位的探查成功率、取石率、残石率及巨大嵌顿结石的取出率。结果:2组患者探查成功率差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。硬质胆镜组和纤维胆道镜组I期取石率分别为69.8%和58.1%,总取石率分别为90.7%和83.7%,残石率分别为9.3%和11.6%,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。硬质胆镜组和纤维胆道镜组肝内胆管巨大嵌顿石取出率分别为85.7%和45.5%,硬质胆镜组高于纤维胆道镜组(χ2=4.588,P=0.032);胆总管下段巨大嵌顿石取出率分别为90.9%和61.5%,硬质胆管镜组高于纤维胆道镜组,但差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.967,P=0.085);肝脏边缘结石取出率分别为33.3%和50.0%,纤维胆道镜组高于硬质胆镜组,差异亦无统计学意义(χ2=0.486,P=0.486)。结论:纤维胆道镜和硬质胆镜在治疗胆管结石中各有不同的优势,临床应用中2种胆道镜合理配合应用有助于提高取石成功率。     

Operative choledochoscopy.

We have reported the results of 121 examinations with the rigid choledochoscope performed by 13 different surgeons between 1969 and 1977. Pre-exploratory choledochoscopy was performed in 48 patients with a diagnostic accuracy of 94 per cent. Post-exploratory choledochoscopy was used in 73 patients to define whether the common bile duct had been adequately cleared of stones. Fifty-one patients were correctly assessed as having a clear duct and unsuspected residual calculi were demonstrated by choledochoscopy in 13 patients. However, choledochoscopy failed to identify 9 patients with retained stones. The accuracy of post-exploratory choledochoscopy alone was 87 per cent and the accuracy of post-exploratory cholangiography was 82 per cent, but when choledochoscopy was combined with post-exploratory cholangiography there were no errors. We conclude that the addition of choledochoscopy to conventional radiological techniques is likely to reduce the incidence of residual calculi after choledochotomy.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction or laparoscopic choledochoscopy and electrohydraulic lithotripsy for management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis

Summary Six hundred twenty-two laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at St. Vincent Hospital over a 14-month period. We reviewed the records of 366 of these patients who were referred to the authors. Thirty-six patients had suspected choledocholithiasis. The primary author (M.E.A.) performed 38 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCPs) on these patients for diagnosis and management. Seventeen of the 36 patients had common bile duct stones; 19 patients had negative studies. Of the 17 patients with choledocholithiasis, 15 had successful cannulation of the common bile duct, and, of these, 10 underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus endoscopic sphincterotomy and extraction of the common duct stone(s). In one high-risk elderly patient, we extracted the stone from the common duct and left the gallbladder in situ. Two patients failed endoscopic cannulation and underwent open cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration. Four additional patients, cannulated successfully, had unsuccessful endoscopic stone removal because the stones were too large or were impacted. Two of these patients underwent open cholecystectomy and common duct exploration. The two other patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and choledochoscopy through the cystic duct with the flexible choledochoscope. An electrohydraulic lithotripsy probe was then inserted through the choledochoscope to fragment the stones, and stone fragments were allowed to pass through the previously created sphincterotomy. We believe our data, supported by data in the literature, show that these alternative methods for treating choledocholithiasis are safe and effective and should be considered primary modalities for treating this condition now that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for cholelithiasis.     

小切口经超细胆道镜双频激光碎石术治疗胆总管嵌顿结石

目的探讨小切口下经超细胆道镜U-100激光碎石术治疗胆总管嵌顿结石的应用价值。方法2003年3月～2005年3月，在小切口胆总管探查术中应用经超细胆道镜U-100激光碎石术治疗68例胆总管嵌顿结石，其中胆总管切开探查39例，经胆囊管探查29例。结果68例手术均获成功，一次性结石取净率98．5％（67／68），无胆道损伤、胆道出血等并发症。结论该治疗方法创伤小，碎石充分，并发症少，安全可行，是治疗胆总管嵌顿结石的一种可选择的手术方法。     

A biliary endoscopy model

Intraoperative biliary endoscopy (choledochoscopy) is often not practiced by surgeons despite the availability of both rigid and flexible endoscopes in many operating rooms. The main reasons for this reluctance are lack of familiarity and experience with endoscopic techniques. A biliary model was designed that permits the procedure to be learned. Its important features are mobilization of the duodenum, the use of irrigation, and the possibility of practicing the removal of calculi under visual control. We stress that the use of the choledochoscope is important to reduce the incidence of retained stones after common bile duct explorations.     

Choledochoscopy. A cost-minimization analysis.

Although choledochoscopy for the prevention of retained bile duct stones has been postulated as cost effective, no economic evaluation exists to substantiate this claim. We performed a cost-minimization analysis on 287 patients who underwent choledochoscopy during operations for biliary tract calculi between 1981 and 1987 to assess the economic impact of choledochoscopy versus noncholedochoscopic alternatives in obtaining a stone-free duct. Common duct exploration was positive for calculi in 75% of patients. Choledochoscopy-detected residual stones after duct exploration in 10% of patients. Residual stones were more frequent after positive (12.5%) than negative (2.7%) duct explorations. retained stones occurred in 4.5% of patients after operation. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values of choledochoscopy were 67%, 100%, and 95%, respectively. Cost-minimization analysis showed that total cost of either selective ($75,250) or routine ($110,450) choledochoscopy significantly exceeded the total cost of obtaining a stone-free duct for patients with retained stones via either extraction through a T-tube tract ($17,545) or by endoscopic papillotomy ($45,675). Because choledochoscopy was not economically competitive with noncholedochoscopic, nonoperative alternatives, reduction of choledochoscopy fees was implemented to economically justify continued use of choledochoscopy. We conclude that choledochoscopy is clinically efficacious in obtaining a stone-free duct, but endorsement of either routine or selective choledochoscopy by cost-minimization analysis requires careful assessment of fee structure to make choledochoscopy competitive economically.     

Operative choledochoscopy in patients with acute cholangitis: a prospective, randomized study

A prospective, randomized evaluation of operative choledochoscopy was carried out during emergency surgery in patients with acute cholangitis or acute suppurative cholangitis when conservative management had failed. After common bile duct exploration, 79 patients were randomized to have choledochoscopy and 78 patients to the control group. Laboratory and clinical parameters showed that choledochoscopy did not increase the incidence of septicaemia, acute pancreatitis, persistent cholangitis, postoperative wound sepsis, intraperitoneal sepsis and hospital mortality. The incidence of retained common bile duct stones detected by T tube cholangiography performed in the second postoperative week was significantly reduced (P less than 0.01) after choledochoscopy. Choledochoscopy detected stones missed by conventional common bile duct exploration in ten patients. It is concluded that choledochoscopy is a safe and effective technique in patients with acute cholangitis and acute suppurative cholangitis.