CMR of ventricular function

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the reference standard for the assessment of ventricular dimensions, function, and mass in terms of accuracy and reproducibility. It has been thoroughly validated both ex vivo and against other imaging techniques. Measurements are highly accurate and no geometrical assumptions need to be made about the ventricle. A routine ventricular dataset of images can be acquired in less than 5 minutes and analyzed in about the same time. The field is rapidly advancing with increasing automation and simplification in both image acquisition and analysis. Using parallel and real time imaging techniques, good quality data can be obtained even in patients who are unable to hold their breath. While providing useful information in all patients with suspected heart failure, CMR should particularly be considered in those with poor echo windows, where it can also be combined with myocardial stress. Tagging techniques can provide highly detailed information about myocardial torsion and strain for individual myocardial segments. In a research environment, the very high degree of interscan reproducibility can dramatically reduce the number of patients needed to perform clinical trials.     

Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: The Relationship between the Electrocardiogram and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Conventional assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) using the electrocardiogram (ECG), for example, by the Sokolow–Lyon, Romhilt–Estes or Cornell criteria, have relied on assessing changes in the amplitude and/or duration of the QRS complex of the ECG to quantify LV mass. ECG measures of LV mass have typically been validated by imaging with echocardiography or cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). However, LVH can be the result of diverse etiologies, and LVH is also characterized by pathological changes in myocardial tissue characteristics on the genetic, molecular, cellular, and tissue level beyond a pure increase in the number of otherwise normal cardiomyocytes. For example, slowed conduction velocity through the myocardium, which can be due to diffuse myocardial fibrosis, has been shown to be an important determinant of conventional ECG LVH criteria regardless of LV mass. Myocardial tissue characterization by CMR has emerged to not only quantify LV mass, but also detect and quantify the extent and severity of focal or diffuse myocardial fibrosis, edema, inflammation, myocarditis, fatty replacement, myocardial disarray, and myocardial deposition of amyloid proteins (amyloidosis), glycolipids (Fabry disease), or iron (siderosis). This can be undertaken using CMR techniques including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), T1 mapping, T2 mapping, T2* mapping, extracellular volume fraction (ECV) mapping, fat/water‐weighted imaging, and diffusion tensor CMR. This review presents an overview of current and emerging concepts regarding the diagnostic possibilities of both ECG and CMR for LVH in an attempt to narrow gaps in our knowledge regarding the ECG diagnosis of LVH.     

MRI of left ventricular function.

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is widely recognized as the most accurate noninvasive imaging modality for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. By use of state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, electrocardiography (ECG)-gated cine images depicting LV function with high contrast and excellent spatial and temporal resolution are readily acquired in breath-holds of 5 to 10 heartbeats. For patients in whom breath-holding and ECG gating are difficult, real-time cine imaging without ECG gating and breath-holding can be performed. LV function can be qualitatively assessed from cine images, or alternatively, parameters such as LV volumes, ejection fraction, and mass may be quantified via computer-based analysis software. In addition, techniques such as myocardial tagging and newer variants can be used to qualitatively or quantitatively assess regional intramyocardial strain, twist, and torsion. Many of the CMR methods have undergone clinical evaluation in the settings of high-dose dobutamine stress testing and determination of myocardial viability. These methods are also very accurate for prognosis in coronary heart disease patients and may be quite useful for the detection of contractile dyssynchrony. When used together with other CMR techniques such as first-pass perfusion imaging or late gadolinium enhancement, CMR of LV function provides a wealth of information in a single imaging study.     

Artificial Intelligence and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Myocardial Infarction Patients

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is an important cardiac imaging tool for assessing the prognostic extent of myocardial injury after myocardial infarction (MI). Within the context of clinical trials, CMR is also useful for assessing the efficacy of potential cardioprotective therapies in reducing MI size and preventing adverse left ventricular (LV) remodelling in reperfused MI. However, manual contouring and analysis can be time-consuming with interobserver and intra-observer variability, which can in turn lead to reduction in accuracy and precision of analysis. There is thus a need to automate CMR scan analysis in MI patients to save time, increase accuracy, increase reproducibility and increase precision. In this regard, automated imaging analysis techniques based on artificial intelligence (AI) that are developed with machine learning (ML), and more specifically deep learning (DL) strategies, can enable efficient, robust, accurate and clinician-friendly tools to be built so as to try and improve both clinician productivity and quality of patient care. In this review, we discuss basic concepts of ML in CMR, important prognostic CMR imaging biomarkers in MI and the utility of current ML applications in their analysis as assessed in research studies. We highlight potential barriers to the mainstream implementation of these automated strategies and discuss related governance and quality control issues. Lastly, we discuss the future role of ML applications in clinical trials and the need for global collaboration in growing this field.     

Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance

In the past decade, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has evolved dramatically. Its clinical applications are now a major tool in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of patients with ischemic heart disease. CMR can be used for detection and quantification of ischemia and for viability assessment using different techniques that are now well validated. Scar can be easily detected using contrast enhancement (late gadolinium enhancement). Ischemia detection is usually achieved with stress CMR techniques, whereas prediction for the recovery of function (detection of dysfunctional but viable myocardial segments) can be deduced from scar and stress imaging. Although determination of which approach is better may depend on the population group, the major advantage of CMR is the ability to integrate different information about anatomy, wall motion, myocardial perfusion, and tissue characterization in a single comprehensive examination.     

Assessment of diastolic function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Background The assessment of diastolic heart function has been hampered by multiple difficulties. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a new, noninvasive technique to study cardiac function. Methods The literature on CMR for the analysis of diastolic function and its clinical applications is extensively reviewed. Results Analysis of ventricular filling velocity and volume flow, volumetric assessment of ventricular chamber volume, analysis of 3-dimensional myocardial strains, and assessment of myocardial energy content are numerous validated applications of CMR. With the advent of real-time imaging and automated analysis of myocardial strains, CMR tagging is a promising method to assess regional diastolic function. Today, many CMR techniques are leaving the experimental or developmental stage rapidly and becoming clinically available for the evaluation of diastolic function in heart disease. Conclusions CMR is emerging as a highly accurate and reproducible noninvasive 3-dimensional technique for the assessment of diastolic function. (Am Heart J 2002;144:198-205.)     

Imaging Heart Failure: Current and Future Applications

A variety of cardiac imaging tests are used to help manage patients with heart failure (HF). This article reviews current and future HF applications for the major noninvasive imaging modalities: transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), and computed tomography (CT). TTE is the primary imaging test used in the evaluation of patients with HF, given its widespread availability and reliability in assessing cardiac structure and function. Recent developments in myocardial strain, 3-dimensional TTE, and echo contrast appear to offer superior diagnostic and prognostic information. SPECT imaging is a common method employed to detect ischemia and viability in patients with HF; however, PET offers higher diagnostic accuracy for both. Ongoing study of sympathetic and molecular imaging techniques may enable early disease detection, better risk stratification, and ultimately targeted treatment interventions. CMR provides high-quality information on cardiac structure and function and allows the characterization of myocardial tissue. Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement allows the determination of HF etiology and may predict patient outcomes and treatment response. Cardiac CT has become a reliable means for detecting coronary artery disease, and recent advances have enabled concurrent myocardial function, perfusion, and scar analyses. Overall, available imaging methods provide reliable measures of cardiac performance in HF, and recent advances will allow detection of subclinical disease. More data are needed demonstrating the specific clinical value of imaging methods and particularly subclinical disease detection in large-scale, clinical settings.     

Ischemic heart disease: comprehensive evaluation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Considerable technical advances over the past decade have increased the clinical application of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. A comprehensive CMR examination can accurately measure left and right ventricular size and function, identify the presence and extent of reversible versus irreversible myocardial injury, and detect inducible ischemia. Streamlined protocols allow such a CMR examination to be a time-efficient diagnostic tool in patients with coronary artery disease. Moreover, edema imaging with T2-weighted CMR allows the detection of acute coronary syndromes. In this review, we present the relevant CMR methods and discuss practical uses of CMR in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease.     

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with coronary disease

Opinion statement Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has emerged as a versatile noninvasive tool for the comprehensive evaluation of patients with suspected or established coronary artery disease (CAD). In a single imaging session, CMR can assess left ventricular anatomy and function, myocardial perfusion, viability, and coronary luminal stenosis. Using specific pulse sequences, left ventricular global and regional function can be assessed by cine CMR at rest and in response to inotropic stress; first-pass perfusion quantified by vasodilator stress; myocardial viability evaluated by delayed enhancement imaging and also by functional reserve; and coronary artery stenosis assessed by angiography. All these modalities can be achieved with high spatial resolution and image contrast, without exposure to ionizing radiation, and within a reasonable time frame of about 1 hour of scan time. Also, the imaging planes can be programmed to provide identical views of the heart for each type of image, thereby facilitating intermodality comparisons. There is early but accumulating evidence that the accuracy and prognostic values of many of these modalities are comparable or superior to radionuclide scintigraphy and echocardiography in head-to-head studies. Current limitations unique to CMR include the inability to perform exercise stress testing inside the CMR suite and exclusion of patients with indwelling metallic devices such as defibrillators and pacemakers. Despite these limitations, CMR is unique in its multifaceted approach that can be specifically tailored to the clinical question at hand, making it arguably the best tool for the diagnosis and management of CAD. With the rapid pace of advancement in CMR hardware and pulse sequence technologies, the clinical use of this powerful technique is likely to grow even greater in this area.     

Detection of induced myocardial ischemia during stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance

In the past decade, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has evolved considerably. Its clinical applications enable the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of patients with ischemic heart disease. CMR is safe, with absence of any ionizing radiation, and offers the greatest information from a single test, allowing the assessment of myocardial morphology, myocardial function and viability. Stress-CMR can be used for detection and quantification of ischemia. This article analyses the technical approach, the limits and reviews the available literature about diagnostic performance of stress CMR testing and its results in the prognostication of cardiac patients. With further improvements in CMR techniques and the establishment of a standardized study protocol, stress-CMR will play a pivotal role in managing patients with ischemic heart disease.     

Cardiac involvement in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy

Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DMD/BMD) are X-linked muscular diseases responsible for over 80% of all muscular dystrophies. Cardiac disease is a common manifestation, not necessarily related to the degree of skeletal myopathy; it may be the predominant manifestation with or without any other evidence of muscular disease. Death is usually due to ventricular dysfunction, heart block or malignant arrhythmias. Not only DMD/BMD patients, but also female carriers may present cardiac involvement. Clinically overt heart failure in dystrophinopathies may be delayed or absent, due to relative physical inactivity. The commonest electrocardiographic findings include conduction defects, arrhythmias (supraventricular or ventricular), hypertrophy and evidence of myocardial necrosis. Echocardiography can assess a marked variability of left ventricular dysfunction, independently of age of onset or mutation groups. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has documented a pattern of epicardial fibrosis in both dystrophinopathies’ patients and carriers that can be observed even if overt muscular disease is absent. Recently, new CMR techniques, such as postcontrast myocardial T1 mapping, have been used in Duchenne muscular dystrophy to detect diffuse myocardial fibrosis. A combined approach using clinical assessment and CMR evaluation may motivate early cardioprotective treatment in both patients and asymptomatic carriers and delay the development of serious cardiac complications.     

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging assessment of outcomes in acute myocardial infarction

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance(CMR) imaging uniquely characterizes myocardial and microvascular injury in acute myocardial infarction(AMI), providing powerful surrogate markers of outcomes. The last 10 years have seen an exponential increase in AMI studies utilizing CMR based endpoints. This article provides a contemporary, comprehensive review of the powerful role of CMR imaging in the assessment of outcomes in AMI. The theory, assessment techniques, chronology, importance in predicting left ventricular function and remodelling, and prognostic value of each CMR surrogate marker is described in detail. Major studies illustrating the importance of the markers are summarized, providing an up to date review of the literature base in CMR imaging in AMI.     

Principles, current status and clinical implications of ischaemic heart disease assessment by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has matured into a robust, accurate and highly reproducible imaging modality for the assessment of cardiac function and ischaemic heart disease. The unique physical properties of CMR permit depiction of pathology-specific tissue contrast based on differences in tissue composition, such as myocardial oedema, necrosis and fibrosis. This can be imaged at high spatial resolution allowing characterisation of the acuity of an ischaemic event, the presence and extent of myocardial ischaemia, necrosis and viability. Prognostically important information obtained from CMR evaluation of ischaemic heart disease, such as left ventricular ejection fraction, infarct size and transmurality, infarct location and the presence of intraventricular mechanical dyssynchrony may be used to guide coronary revascularisation, device and medical therapies.     

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of Myocarditis

Within the past decade, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has led to unprecedented growth in our understanding of myocarditis. From what began as a diagnostic tool for assessing ventricular function, CMR has transitioned into visualizing changes that occur in myocardial tissue during inflammation, including edema, hyperemia/inflammation, and fibrosis. In terms of research applications, the entire spectrum ranging from subclinical to fulminant myocarditis can be visualized, as well as unmasking myocarditis from other cardiomyopathies. The impact of CMR in clinical applications is best exemplified by recent findings demonstrating that CMR is a leading diagnostic tool and may perhaps even be the method of choice for establishing a diagnosis of myocarditis in Germany. With the advent of an International Consensus Group on Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis and large-scale multicenter registries on CMR-based visualization of myocarditis, further advances aimed at improving clinical decision making and guiding patient therapy are expected.     

Advances in the Understanding of the Pathophysiology and Management of Aortic Stenosis: Role of Novel Imaging Techniques

The management of asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial and the mechanisms leading to symptom generation and adverse outcome are not fully understood. Novel imaging techniques offer a noninvasive tool for in vivo assessment of AS and its pathophysiological consequences on the myocardium. Exercise echocardiography provides insight into the mechanisms responsible for exercise limitation and symptom generation. Speckle tracking allows the detection of reduced myocardial strain, which is associated with adverse events in asymptomatic patients. Computed tomography scanning can accurately quantify valve calcification and is associated with disease severity. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging has the potential to monitor disease activity (inflammation and microcalcification) for the first time. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging uniquely allows tissue characterization with identification of fibrosis, a key characteristic of failing myocardium. T1 mapping allows estimation of diffuse interstitial fibrosis and late gadolinium enhancement demonstrates focal fibrosis/scarring. Myocardial steatosis, assessed using CMR spectroscopy, is increased in severe AS and might contribute to myocardial dysfunction. Positron emission tomography and CMR imaging can quantify myocardial blood flow and assess microvascular dysfunction, which might contribute to symptom development and myocardial remodelling. These novel imaging techniques are now being assessed in prospective prognostic studies that will clarify their utility in risk stratification in AS, and lead to improved management and outcomes for these patients.     

The emerging clinical role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Starting as a research method little more than a decade ago, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has rapidly evolved to become a powerful diagnostic tool used in routine clinical cardiology. The contrast in CMR images is generated from protons in different chemical environments and, therefore, enables high-resolution imaging and specific tissue characterization in vivo, without the use of potentially harmful ionizing radiation.CMR imaging is used for the assessment of regional and global ventricular function, and to answer questions regarding anatomy. State-of-the-art CMR sequences allow for a wide range of tissue characterization approaches, including the identification and quantification of nonviable, edematous, inflamed, infiltrated or hypoperfused myocardium. These tissue changes are not only used to help identify the etiology of cardiomyopathies, but also allow for a better understanding of tissue pathology in vivo. CMR tissue characterization may also be used to stage a disease process; for example, elevated T2 signal is consistent with edema and helps differentiate acute from chronic myocardial injury, and the extent of myocardial fibrosis as imaged by contrast-enhanced CMR correlates with adverse patient outcome in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies.The current role of CMR imaging in clinical cardiology is reviewed, including coronary artery disease, congenital heart disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathies and valvular disease.     

Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Prediction: The Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for more than 4 million global deaths per year. While it is most commonly caused by coronary artery disease, a final common pathway of ventricular arrhythmias is shared by different etiologies. The most effective primary and secondary prevention strategy is an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The decision to implant an ICD for primary prevention is largely based on a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35%, but this criterion in isolation is neither sensitive nor specific. Novel imaging parameters hold promise to improve ICD candidate selection. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is a powerful and versatile technique, with the ability to comprehensively assess cardiac structure and function. A range of variables based on CMR techniques (late gadolinium enhancement, T₁ mapping, T₂* relaxometry, deformation imaging) have been associated with ventricular arrhythmias and SCD risk. The role of CMR in the estimation of ventricular arrhythmias and SCD risk in coronary artery disease, nonischemic cardiomyopathies, cardiac transplant, iron-overload cardiomyopathy and valvular heart disease is reviewed in this article. Prospective, randomized trials and standardization of CMR techniques are required before its routine use can be recommended for guiding SCD prevention strategies.     

Multi-Modality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiovascular Toxicity in the Cancer Patient

Cancer therapy can be associated with both cardiac and vascular toxicity. Advanced multi-modality imaging can be used to stratify patient risk, identify cardiovascular injury during and after therapy, and forecast recovery. Echocardiography continues to be the mainstay in the evaluation of cardiac toxicity. Particularly, echocardiography-based strain imaging is useful for risk stratification of patients at baseline, and detection of subclinical left ventricle (LV) dysfunction during therapy. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) serves a complementary role in the patient with poor echocardiographic or equilibrium radionuclide angiographic image quality or in situations where a more accurate and precise LV ejection fraction measurement is needed to inform decisions regarding discontinuation of chemotherapy. New CMR techniques like T1 and T2 mapping and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging will help us better understand the structural, pathological, and metabolic myocardial changes associated with ventricular dysfunction or release of serum biomarkers. CMR may also be helpful in the evaluation of vascular complications of cancer therapy. Stress echocardiography, stress CMR, computed tomography, and PET are excellent imaging options in the evaluation of ischemia in patients receiving therapies that could potentially cause vasospasm or accelerated atherosclerosis.     

Management of Patients With Single-Ventricle Physiology Across the Lifespan: Contributions From Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) are robust cross-sectional imaging modalities that are increasingly being used to guide the diagnosis and management of those born with single-ventricle physiology. The purpose of this review is to acquaint the reader with the wide range of cross-sectional imaging applications that can be applied in this population. Illustrative examples of information provided by CMR and CCT are included, such as delineation of cardiac anatomy, measurement of ventricular volumetry, interrogation of vascular anatomy and flows, evaluation of myocardial viability, and exclusion of thromboembolic disease. Focus is placed on the appropriate selection and timing of advanced cardiac imaging modalities, and differentiations are made between established indications for imaging and emerging applications (such as 4-dimensional [4D] flow assessment and parametric imaging for identification of diffuse fibrosis using CMR). Potential CMR and CCT contributions in the selection of interventional strategies in the child and for surveillance of postoperative complications in the adult are highlighted. Furthermore, the importance of extracardiac cross-sectional imaging in the single-ventricle population is emphasized given the recognition that complications post-Fontan palliation are not limited to the cardiovascular system but will often include extracardiac manifestations of disease (such as hepatic disease or lymphatic abnormalities), While the value of CMR and CCT for contemporary clinical care of individuals born with single-ventricle physiology appears to be well-established, further research will be necessary to explore the impact of risk stratification using imaging biomarkers on clinical outcomes following Fontan palliation.     

Diagnosis and management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents an important cause of mortality. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging evolved as an imaging modality that allows the assessment of myocardial function, perfusion, contractile reserve and extent of fibrosis in a single comprehensive exam. This review highlights the role of CMR in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain by detecting the location of obstructive CAD or necrosis and identifying other conditions like stress cardiomyopathy or myocarditis that can present with acute chest pain. Besides, it underlines the prognostic implication of perfusion abnormalities in the setting of acute chest pain. Furthermore, the review addresses the role of CMR to detect significant CAD in patients with stable CAD. It elucidates the accuracy and clinical utility of CMR with respect to other imaging modalities like single-photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Besides, the prognostic value of CMR stress testing is discussed. Additionally, it summarizes the available CMR techniques to assess myocardial viability and describes algorithm to identify those patient who might profit from revascularization those who should be treated medically. Finally, future promising imaging techniques that will provide further insights into the fundamental disease processes in ischemic cardiomyopathy are discussed.