Risk factors for detecting germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast or ovarian cancer

We ascertained 184 Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast/ovarian cancer (171 breast and 13 ovarian cancers, two of the former also had ovarian cancer) in a self-referral study. They were tested for germline founder mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG, 5382insC, 188del11) and BRCA2 (6174delT). Personal/family histories were correlated with mutation status. Logistic regression was used to develop a model to predict those breast cancer cases likely to be germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers in this population. The most important factors were age at diagnosis, personal/family history of ovarian cancer, or breast cancer diagnosed before 60 years in a first degree relative. A total of 15.8% of breast cancer cases, one of 13 ovarian cancer cases (7.7%), and both cases with ovarian and breast cancer carried one of the founder mutations. Age at diagnosis in carriers (44.6 years) was significantly lower than in non-carriers (52.1 years) (p<0.001), and was slightly lower in BRCA1 than BRCA2 carriers. Thirty three percent of carriers had no family history of breast or ovarian cancer in first or second degree relatives. Conversely, 12% of non-mutation carriers had strong family histories, with both a first and a second degree relative diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. The predicted values from the logistic model can be used to define criteria for identifying Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer who are at high risk of carrying BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The following criteria would identify those at approximately 10% risk: (1) breast cancer <50 years, (2) breast cancer <60 years with a first degree relative with breast cancer <60 years, or (3) breast cancer <70 years and a first or second degree relative with ovarian cancer.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations in patients with bilateral breast cancer

Bilateral breast cancer is traditionally considered an indirect indicator of inherited predisposition to cancer. To appreciate the contribution of genetic determinants to bilateral breast cancer in Jewish women we genotyped 55 such women for the three predominant mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and BRCA2 (6174delT) that account for the overwhelming majority of BRCA mutations in high-risk Jewish families. Among women with bilateral breast cancer, 17 mutation carriers (17/55; 29.6%) were identified. Individual mutation frequencies were 18.5% (10/55) for 185delAG, 3.7% (2/55) for 5382insC and 7.4% (5/55) for 6174delT. Carrier rate was significantly higher (P < 0.0016) in women with bilateral breast cancer whose first tumour was diagnosed at or before 42 years of age (82%; 14/17) than in women diagnosed after 42 years of age (7.9%; 3/38). Among patients with bilateral breast cancer and positive family history 45% (14/31) carried a BRCA mutation. Of these 86% (12/14) had one breast cancer diagnosed at or before 42 years of age. Our results suggest that bilateral breast cancer per se, in most cases, does not reflect genetic predisposition, unless associated with early age of onset (first tumour diagnosed at or before 42 years of age). Although the relationship between young age and carrier state in women with bilateral breast cancer is strong, no significant association between family history and carrier state was found. We can thus speculate that women with early onset breast cancer who carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are prone to acquire a second breast tumour.     

Similar prevalence of founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi men with breast cancer: evidence from 261 cases in Israel, 1976-1999

To evaluate the potential contribution of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to male breast cancer (MBC), we expanded a previous study to screen a total of 261 Israeli men diagnosed with breast carcinoma. A total of 21 BRCA2 6174delT and 8 BRCA1 185delAG mutations were found. Similar frequencies of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers were found among Ashkenazi (12.8%) and non-Ashkenazi Jews (9.1%). The combined prevalence of BRCA1/BRCA2 founder mutations among Ashkenazi Jewish men is slightly higher than for women, due to a higher frequency of BRCA2 mutations.     

Germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in Turkish breast/ovarian cancer patients

In this study we genotyped Turkish breast/ovarian cancer patients for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: protein truncation test (PTT) for exon 11 BRCA1 of and, multiplex PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for BRCA2, complemented by DNA sequencing. In addition, a modified restriction assay was used for analysis of the predominant Jewish mutations: 185delAG, 5382InsC, Tyr978X (BRCA1) and 6174delT (BRCA2). Eighty three breast/ovarian cancer patients were screened: twenty three had a positive family history of breast/ovarian cancer, ten were males with breast cancer at any age, in eighteen the disease was diagnosed under 40 years of age, one patient had ovarian cancer in addition to breast cancer and one patient had ovarian cancer. All the rest (n=30) were considered sporadic breast cancer cases. Overall, 3 pathogenic mutations (3/53-5.7%) were detected, all in high risk individuals (3/23-13%): a novel (2990insA) and a previously described mutation (R1203X) in BRCA1, and a novel mutation (9255delT) in BRCA2. In addition, three missense mutations [two novel (T42S, N2742S) and a previously published one (S384F)] and two neutral polymorphisms (P9P, P2532P) were detected in BRCA2. Notably none of the male breast cancer patients harbored any mutation, and none of the tested individuals carried any of the Jewish mutations. Our findings suggest that there are no predominant mutations within exon 11 of the BRCA1 and in BRCA2 gene in Turkish high risk families.     

Androgen receptor CAG repeat length in Jewish Israeli women who are BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: association with breast/ovarian cancer phenotype

BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are at an increased risk for developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. Yet, the genetic and environmental factors that govern the phenotypic expression of mutant BRCA1/2 alleles remain elusive. The CAG repeat within exon 1 of the androgen receptor (AR) gene is reportedly associated with breast cancer phenotype in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Two hundred and twenty seven BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were genotyped for the polymorphic AR CAG repeat, and allele size was correlated with breast/ovarian cancer morbidity parameters. Of 227 BRCA1/2 carriers, 169 were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 58 carried a BRCA2 mutation, 149 had breast and/or ovarian cancer and 78 were asymptomatic mutation carriers. The mean age at diagnosis in women with either or both neoplasms was 46.7+/-11.2 years, and that of the asymptomatic group - 45.8+/-9.4 years, a statistically insignificant difference. The AR CAG repeat ranged from eight to 28 in all tested women, and the mean number of the repeats were not statistically different between affected (18.3+/-2.4) and asymptomatic mutation carriers (18.6+/-2.1). The AR CAG repeat among patients with early onset (<42 years) breast cancer was significantly shorter (17.5+/-2.3) compared with asymptomatic individuals (18.6+/-2.1) (P<0.01), and the shorter allele - the younger the age at diagnosis. There is no conclusive evidence of association between AR CAG repeat size and breast or ovarian cancer risk in Jewish BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. A small effect of a short AR CAG allele size on breast cancer at early age (<42 years) cannot be excluded.     

An unaffected individual from a breast/ovarian cancer family with germline mutations in both BRCA1 and BRCA2

Currently many centers offer testing for three specific mutations, 185delAG, 5382insC, and 6174delT, in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to Ashkenazi Jewish individuals at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. We recently tested members of a family with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer (Family R014). The proband in this family tested positive for the 185delAG mutation. The unaffected sister of the proband tested positive for both the 185delAG and the 6174delT mutations. Further testing and review of the family history suggest that both mutations may have come from a maternal grandfather and passed down for two generations. Counseling of the unaffected double heterozygote individual in this family is complicated by lack of information on the risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers in such individuals. A better understanding of these risks will depend on the identification and study of more individuals carrying mutations in both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Our study emphasizes the importance of testing Ashkenazi Jewish individuals from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families for all three common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations identified in this ethnic group.     

An evaluation of common breast cancer gene mutations in a population of Ashkenazi Jews.

OBJECTIVES: In view of the recent reports of recurrent mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Ashkenazi Jewish population, we have undertaken to assess the frequency of these mutations in this population attending for genetic counselling and risk assessment of familial breast cancer. DESIGN: Mutation screening for the 185delAG and the 5382insC mutations in BRCA1 and the 6174delT mutation in BRCA2 was performed on DNA samples from either subjects affected by breast or ovarian cancer or obligate gene carriers. The likelihood of the cancers being hereditary in each family was calculated. SUBJECTS: Blood samples were obtained from 26 affected subjects or obligate gene carriers from 23 Ashkenazi Jewish families, all with a history of either early onset breast or ovarian cancers, or multiple cases of breast or ovarian cancer. RESULTS: Twelve mutations have been identified in the 23 families (52%) of which eight (67%) were the 185delAG mutation, three (25%) were the 6174delT mutation, and one (8%) was the 5382insC mutation. While the majority of these mutations were identified in families with a greater than 50% probability of being hereditary under the CASH segregation model, three mutations were identified in families with a 35% or less probability. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic screening of the recurrent mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish families will lead to the availability of predictive testing in a reasonably large proportion, even if the family history of breast/ovarian cancer is not particularly strong. In our view it is possible to reassure high risk unaffected members of these families, if the screening is negative for these mutations, even if a sample from an affected member of the family is unavailable for previous screening.     

A low frequency of non-founder BRCA1 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast-ovarian cancer families

The 185delAG and 5382insC founder mutations account for the majority of mutations identified in BRCA1 in Ashkenazi Jewish breast and breast-ovarian cancer families. Few non-founder BRCA1 mutations have been identified to date in these families. We initially screened a panel of 245 Ashkenazi Jewish breast-ovarian cancer families with an affected proband and at least one other case of breast or ovarian cancer for founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Founder mutations were identified in 85 families (185delAG in 44 families, 5382insC in 16 families, and the BRCA2 6174delT in 25 families). The 160 negative families were then screened for the entire BRCA1 gene by a combination of DGGE and PTT. We identified one novel frameshift mutation in BRCA1 in exon 14 (4572del22) that truncated the protein at codon 1485. The family contained three cases of early-onset ovarian cancer (41 years, 43 years, and 52 years) and one case of breast cancer (at age 54 years subsequent to an ovarian cancer). In addition, three missense variants of unknown significance (exon 11 C3832T (P1238L), exon 15 G4654T (S1512I), and exon 15 G4755A (D1546N)) were found in single families. These missense variants have been previously identified in other families [BIC Database] and are considered to be "unclassified variants, favoring polymorphism." Non-founder BRCA1 mutations are rare in Ashkenazi Jewish breast/ovarian cancer families.     

Impact of a paternal origin of germline BRCA1/2 mutations on the age at breast and ovarian cancer diagnosis in a Southern Swedish cohort

Three studies have reported that BRCA1/2 mutations of paternal origin confer an earlier age at breast cancer diagnosis compared with maternal origin. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of parental origin of BRCA1/2 mutations on age at breast and ovarian cancer diagnosis. This study included 577 female BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. All BRCA1/2 mutation carriers belonged to families registered between 1993 and 2011 at the Oncogenetic Clinic at Skånes University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used to analyze time to breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis. A novel finding was that carriers of BRCA1 mutations of paternal origin were 4 years older at age of ovarian cancer (P = 0.009) compared with those carrying a BRCA1 mutation of maternal origin. BRCA1 carriers with mutations of paternal origin were 4 years younger at breast cancer diagnosis (P = 0.017) compared with those carrying a BRCA1 mutation of maternal origin, which is in agreement with three previous studies. Both findings were adjusted for of year of inclusion, birth date, and oral contraceptive pill use. No associations between parental origin of BRCA2 mutations and time to breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis were found. An attempt to handle a potential selection bias regarding use of oral contraceptives was made using multiple imputations by chained equations. The observed age difference may allow a greater understanding of mechanisms associated with the differences in cancer penetrance in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, some of which may depend on paternal origin. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Founder mutations in <Emphasis Type="Italic">BRCA1/2</Emphasis> are not frequent in Canadian Ashkenazi Jewish men with prostate cancer

Background  

Relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have long been proposed by epidemiological studies to have an increased risk of developing prostate cancer. In the Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ) population, the existence of 3 frequent founder mutations, 185delAG and 5382insC in BRCA1 and 6174delT in BRCA2 greatly facilitates screening for carriers.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among familial breast cancer patients from Costa Rica

Gutiérrez Espeleta GA, Llacuachaqui M, García-Jiménez L, Aguilar Herrera M, Loáiciga Vega K, Ortiz A, Royer R, Li S, Narod SA. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among familial breast cancer patients from Costa Rica. The contribution of mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes to the burden of breast cancer in Costa Rica has not been studied. We estimated the frequency of BRCA mutations among 111 Costa Rican women with breast cancer and a family history of breast cancer. These women were mainly from the metropolitan area of San José. A detailed family history was obtained from each patient and a blood sample was processed for DNA extraction. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were sought using a combination of techniques and all mutations were confirmed by direct sequencing. Four different mutations were identified in five patients (four in BRCA2 and one in BRCA1) representing 4.5% of the total. Two unrelated patients were found to have a BRCA2 5531delTT mutation. Other BRCA2 mutations included C5507G and 6174delT. Only one BRCA1 mutation was found (C3522T). The family with the BRCA1 mutation had five cases of gastric cancer. Families with BRCA2 mutations were also reported to have cases of gastric and prostate cancers; however, the full range of cancers associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Costa Rica has not yet been established.     

High follicular phase luteinizing hormone levels in young healthy BRCA1 mutation carriers: implications for breast and ovarian cancer risk

BRCA1 mutation carriers have up to 80% life-time risk of developing breast cancer and 20-40% risk of developing ovarian cancer. High LH levels have been linked to increased risks of both breast and ovarian cancers in some studies and it is unknown whether gonadotropin levels are associated with BRCA1 mutation status. The aim of the study was to explore whether gonadotropin levels were associated with BRCA1 mutation status among healthy 40-year-old-women from hereditary breast cancer families. All women completed a questionnaire including information on reproductive factors and OC use. We measured height, weight, breast volumes, and plasma levels of LH, FSH, and estradiol (E2) once during menstrual cycle days 5-10 and once again during cycle days 18-23 in 43 non-carriers from BRCA1 families, 20 BRCA1 mutation carriers, and 101 women from non-BRCA1/2 families. The strongest predictors of high LH levels among BRCA1 mutation carriers and non-carriers during cycle days 5-10 were being a BRCA1 mutation carrier (p=0.002), lack of current OC use (p=0.003), and being nulliparous (p=0.01), adjusted for age and menstrual cycle day when the samples were obtained. This association was seen both in non-OC users and current OC users but was only significant in the former group (p=0.005). Because of multiple analyses it is possible that our finding is a result of a Type 1 statistical error. After a permutation test the new adjusted p value in non-OC users was 0.05. FSH and E2 were similar in non-carriers, BRCA1 mutation carriers and women from non-BRCA1/2 families. We found significantly elevated LH levels in the follicular phase among young healthy BRCA1 mutation carriers compared with non-carriers from BRCA1 families. This is a small study and confirmatory studies are warranted to establish whether elevated LH levels are part of the BRCA1 phenotype and may be manipulated in order to reduce cancer risks in BRCA1 mutation carriers.     

Mutational analyses of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jewish women with familial breast and ovarian cancer

In Ashkenazi (East European) Jews, three predominant mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and BRCA2 (6174delT) account for the majority of germline mutations in high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families. Among non-Ashkenazi Jews, the 185delAG, Tyr978Ter, and a handful of "private" mutations have been reported anecdotally within both genes. In this study we attempted to determine the spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in high-risk Jewish individuals, non-carriers of any of the predominant Jewish mutations. We employed multiplex PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis for BRCA2, and combined denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and protein truncation test (PTT) for BRCA1, complemented by DNA sequencing. We screened 47 high-risk Jewish individuals, 26 Ashkenazis, and 21 non-Ashkenazis. Overall, 13 sequence alterations in BRCA1 and eight in BRCA2 were detected: nine neutral polymorphisms and 12 missense mutations, including five novel ones. The novel missense mutations did not co-segregate with disease in BRCA1 and were detected at rates of 6.25% to 52.5% in the general population for BRCA2. Our findings suggest that except for the predominant mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Jewish individuals, there are only a handful of pathogenic mutations within these genes. It may imply novel genes may underlie inherited susceptibility to breast/ovarian cancer in Jewish individuals.     

A family with three germline mutations in BRCAl and BRCA2

Liede A, Metcalfe K, Offit K, Brown K, Miller S, Narod SA, Moslehi R. A family with three germline mutations in BRCAl and BRCA2 . Clin Genet 1998: 54: 215–218. 0 Munksgaard. 1998
Several cancer genetics centres offer testing for specific BRCAl and BRCAZ mutations to Ashkenazi Jewish individuals with a family history of breast and ovarian cancers. Testing involves screening for three common mutations found in this population, namely BRCA I 185delAG, 5382insC and BRCA2 6174delT (Struewing et al., Nat Genet 1995: 11: 198–200; Roa et al., Nat Genet 1996: 14 185–187; Oddoux et al., Nat Genet 1996: 14 188–190). We have identified a large Ashkenazi Jewish kindred (W9170) with ten cases of breast cancer and four cases of ovarian carcinoma. Initially, mutation analysis for this family identified a BRCAl 185delAG mutation in the proband diagnosed with three separate primary cancers of the breast, ovary and colon. Another individual in this family diagnosed with two primary cancers of the ovary and breast, was identified as having a second mutation, BRCA I 5382insC. Subsequent work found that two sisters (cousins of the proband), both diagnosed with carcinoma of the breast, had a third mutation, BRCAZ 6174delT. These three mutations have previously been found to be more common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population (References as above). The identification of all three mutations in one family, raised new implications for the manner in which testing and counselling should be offered. In our opinion, Ashkenazi Jewish individuals in breast-ovarian cancer families should be offered complete testing for the three common Ashkenazi Jewish mutations regardless of previous identification of one of these mutations in the family.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and cancer family history of Danish women affected with multifocal or bilateral breast cancer at a young age

INTRODUCTION—A small fraction of breast cancer is the result of germline mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 cancer susceptibility genes. Mutation carriers frequently have a positive family history of breast and ovarian cancer, are often diagnosed at a young age, and may have a higher incidence of double or multiple primary breast tumours than breast cancer patients in general.
OBJECTIVES—To estimate the prevalence and spectrum of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young Danish patients affected with bilateral or multifocal breast cancer and to determine the relationship of mutation status to family history of cancer.
SUBJECTS—From the files of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG), we selected 119 breast cancer patients diagnosed before the age of 46 years with either bilateral (n=59) or multifocal (n=61) disease.
METHODS—DNA from the subjects was screened for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations using single strand conformation analysis (SSCA) and the protein truncation test (PTT). Observed and expected cancer incidence in first degree relatives of the patients was estimated using data from the Danish Cancer Registry.
RESULTS—Twenty four mutation carriers were identified (20%), of whom 13 had a BRCA1 mutation and 11 carried a BRCA2 mutation. Two mutations in BRCA1 were found repeatedly in the material and accounted for seven of the 24 (29%) mutation carriers. The mutation frequency was about equal in patients with bilateral (22%) and multifocal breast cancer (18%). The incidence of breast and ovarian cancer was greatly increased in first degree relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, but to a much lesser degree in relatives of non-carriers. An increased risk of cancer was also noted in brothers of non-carriers.
CONCLUSIONS—A relatively broad spectrum of germline mutations was observed in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and most of the mutations are present in other populations. Our results indicate that a diagnosis of bilateral and multifocal breast cancer is predictive of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status, particularly when combined with information on the patients' age at diagnosis and family history of breast/ovarian cancer.


Keywords: breast cancer; mutations; BRCA1; BRCA2     

Genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation: prophylactic surgery and screening behavior in women 2 years post testing

Mutations in the BRCA1 gene are associated with an increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer in carrier women. An understanding of behavioral responses to BRCA1 mutation testing by mutation carriers and non-carriers is important to guide the clinical application of this new technology. This study examined the utilization of genetic testing for a BRCA1 mutation in high-risk individuals and the response of tested women with respect to interventions for early cancer detection and prevention. This study assessed the utilization of genetic testing for both men and women in a large kindred and the behavioral responses by women with respect to use of health care interventions during the 2 years following testing. Participants were offered BRCA1 mutation testing. Surveillance behaviors related to breast and ovarian cancer were assessed by computer-assisted telephone interviews at baseline (prior to genetic counseling and testing), 1-2 weeks, 4-6 months, 1 and 2 years after the provision of test results. Mutation carriers, non-carriers, and individuals of unknown mutation status were compared to determine the impact of test results. Utilization of genetic testing for both men and women are reported and, for women, mammography, breast self-exam, clinical breast exam, mastectomy, oophorectomy, transvaginal ultrasound, and CA125 screening were assessed. Of those fully informed of the opportunity for testing, 55% of the women and 52% of the men pursued genetic testing. With respect to mammography for women 40 years and older, 82% of mutation carriers obtained a mammogram in each year following testing compared to 72% of non-carrier women the first year and 67% the second year. This mammography utilization represents a significant increase over baseline for both mutation carriers and non-carriers. Younger carrier women also significantly increased their mammography utilization from baseline. Overall, 29% of the carrier women did not obtain a single mammogram by 2 years post-testing. At 2 years, 83% of the carrier women and 74% of the non-carriers reported adherence to recommendations for breast self-exam and over 80% of carrier women had obtained a clinical breast examination each year following testing. None of the carrier women had obtained a prophylactic mastectomy by 2 years after testing, although 11% were considering this procedure. Of carrier women 25 years of age and older who had at least one intact ovary at the time of testing, 46% of carriers had obtained an oophorectomy 2 years after testing, including 78% of women 40 years of age and older. The majority of carrier women (73%) had discussed their genetic test results with a medical doctor or health care provider. Our results indicate utilization of genetic testing by a majority of high-risk individuals who received information about testing. Both carriers and non-carriers increased their utilization of mammography and breast self-exam following testing. Oophorectomy was obtained by a large proportion of carrier women in contrast to mastectomy which was not utilized within the first 2 years following testing.     

Genetic counseling in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Israel: psychosocial impact and retention of genetic information

Genetic counseling for individuals at high risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer (oncogenetic counseling) involves evaluation of cancer risk, psychological assessment, and genetic testing for germline mutations in BRCA1/BRCA2 genes. The long-term psychosocial impact of oncogenetic counseling on consultees and the retention of oncogenetic information are uncertain. We retrospectively interviewed 155 women who underwent oncogenetic counseling in a single medical center in Israel in 1996 (N = 50) and 1998 (N = 105). There were 29 (18.7%) BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers and 126 non-carriers; 58 (37.4%) had a past or present history of cancer, and 97 (62.6%) were first-degree relatives within breast/ovarian cancer families. A questionnaire evaluating self-reported distress and anxiety symptoms before and after counseling, as well as the retention of relevant information (e.g., individual and offspring cancer risk, early detection schemes), one and three years after the initial consultation was administered. Overall, oncogenetic counseling had a minimal effect on anxiety-related symptoms. Mutation carriers reported anxiety-associated symptoms, such as sleeplessness and "bad mood", more frequently than non-carriers following oncogenetic counseling. As expected, 61.8% of carriers and only 30% of non-carriers accurately remembered the personal and offspring cancer risk and preventive and early detection schemes. We conclude that although there seemed to be slight worsening of anxiety-related symptoms following oncogenetic counseling in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers, these symptoms were minimal and did not affect everyday life activities. In addition, there is an ongoing need to emphasize oncogenetic information to high-risk individuals.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a South American population

A sample of 64 high-risk breast and/or ovarian cancer families from Chile were screened for germline mutations in the coding sequences and exon-intron boundaries of BRCA1 (MIN no. 113705) and BRCA2 (MIN no. 600185) genes using conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis, and the mutations found were confirmed with direct sequencing. Seven families (10.9%) were found to carry BRCA1 mutations and three families (4.7%) had BRCA2 mutations. Six different pathogenic mutations were detected in BRCA1, four that had been reported previously (c.187_188delAG; c.300T-->G, c.3450_3453delCAAG and IVS17-1G-->A) and two novel mutations (c.2605_2606delTT and c.4185_4188delCAAG). In BRCA2, we found three different pathogenic mutations, two previously described (c.6174delT and c.6503_6504delTT) and one novel mutation (c.5667delT). We also identified nine variants of unknown significance (five in BRCA1 and four in BRCA2). These findings indicate that the Chilean population has a heterogeneous spectrum of prevalent BRCA mutations. Given the results obtained in our study, the screening of the entire BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding regions is necessary for the molecular genetic testing of Chilean high-risk breast/ovarian cancer patients. To our knowledge, this is the first genetic study of BRCA gene mutations conducted in Chile. The Chilean population has a well-known admixed Amerindian-Caucasian ratio and, therefore, our findings are not only important per se, but they constitute the basis for improved and more specific genetic counselling, as well as to support for preventive campaigns geared toward the Chilean population.     

Clinical and molecular features associated with biallelic mutations in FANCD1/BRCA2

Patients with biallelic mutations in BRCA2 are in Fanconi anaemia group D1. We analysed the severity of the mutations in 27 cases, classified according to their association with breast cancer in heterozygotes, and their predicted functional effect. Twenty mutations were frameshifts or truncations, three involved splice sites, five were missense variants of unknown severity and two were benign polymorphisms. Five patients had VACTERL-H association. Leukaemia was reported in 13 patients, and solid tumours in 15; 6 patients had two or more malignancies. The cumulative probability of any malignancy was 97% by age 5.2 years. IVS7+1G-->A and IVS7+2T-->G were associated with AML, and 886delGT and 6174delT with brain tumours. However, patients with other alleles remained at very high risk of these events. Missense mutations formed a distinct cluster in a highly conserved region of the BRCA2 protein. The small group of patients with biallelic mutations in BRCA2 is distinctive in the severity of the phenotype, and early onset and high rates of leukaemia and specific solid tumours, and may comprise an extreme variant of Fanconi anaemia. Several of the alleles were not associated with cancer in presumed carriers, and thus counselling presents more uncertainties than usual.     

Penetrances of breast and ovarian cancer in a large series of families tested for BRCA1/2 mutations

Accurate estimates of breast and ovarian cancer penetrance in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are crucial in genetic counseling. Estimation is difficult because of the low frequency of mutated alleles and the often-uncertain mechanisms of family ascertainment. We estimated the penetrances of breast and ovarian cancers in carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations by maximizing the retrospective likelihood of the genetic model, given the observed test results, in 568 Italian families screened for germline mutations. The software BRCAPRO was used as a probability calculation tool in a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach. Breast cancer penetrances were 27% (95% CI 20-34%) at age 50 years and 39% (27-52%) at age 70 in BRCA1 carriers, and 26% (0.18-0.34%) at age 50 and 44% (29-58%) at age 70 in BRCA2 carriers, and ovarian cancer penetrances were 14% (7-22%) at age 50 and 43% (21-66%) at age 70 in BRCA1 carriers and 3% (0-7%) at age 50 and 15% (4-26%) at age 70 in BRCA2 carriers. The new model gave a better fit than the current default in BRCAPRO, the likelihood being 70 log units greater; in addition, the observed numbers of mutations in families stratified by gene and by cancer profile were not significantly different from those expected. Our new penetrance functions are appropriate for predicting breast cancer risk, and for determining the probability of carrying BRCA1/2 mutations, in people who are presently referred to genetic counseling in Italy. Our approach could lead to country-customized versions of the BRCAPRO software by providing appropriate population-specific estimates.