Effect of left renal vein division during aortic surgery on renal function

A total of 398 consecutive patients underwent surgery for an aneurysm or occlusive disease of the aorta at Norfolk and Norwich Hospital between December 1994 and October 1998. It was necessary to divide the left renal vein in 58 (14.6%) cases. We examined the effect of this division on the mortality rate and renal function. Renal function was assessed by measuring serum creatinine pre-operatively, peri-operatively and long-term postoperatively. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between patients who had the left renal vein divided (LRVD) and in whom the left renal vein remained intact (LRVI)--31% versus 32%, P = 0.83. There was no significant difference in the pre-operative serum creatinine level between both groups (107 +/- 21 mumol/l in LRVD versus 103 +/- 29 mumol/l in LRVI, P = 0.14). There was an insignificant rise in the mean serum creatinine 7 days postoperatively (111 +/- 21 mumol/l in LRVD versus 107 +/- 31 mumol/l in LRVI, P = 0.05). The mean serum creatinine returned back to the pre-operative level at 30 days postoperatively (106 +/- 16 mumol/l in LRVD and 105 +/- 29 mumol/l, P = 0.20). After 1 month, there was no significant difference in the number of patients who had a sustained elevation of serum creatinine level (7.5% in LRVD versus 2.7% in LRVI, P = 0.11). We feel that division of the left renal vein is a safe and helpful procedure during juxtarenal aortic surgery.     

Abdominal aortic surgery and the left renal vein

The existence of variations in the anatomy of the left renal vein is an important consideration for the surgeon undertaking resection or reconstruction of the abdominal aorta. These variations are not uncommon and an awareness of them is essential in preventing troublesome operative complications.Sacrifice of the left renal vein may occasionally be necessary, and if care is taken to ligate the vein on the vena caval side of the adrenal and spermatic veins and to preserve these veins, serious damage to the kidney is unlikely although not impossible.     

Safety of left innominate vein division during aortic arch surgery

BACKGROUND: The surgical approach to the aortic arch via median sternotomy can be hindered by the left innominate vein (LIV). Retraction of the LIV may injure the vein. The safety of LIV ligation has been controversial. Opinion has also differed regarding whether a divided vein should be reanastomosed after arch replacement is completed. We report our experience with division and ligation of the LIV for improved aortic arch exposure and facilitated excision of mediastinal tumors. METHODS: From January 1996 to June 1998, the LIV was divided and ligated in 14 patients (8 men, 4 women) after consideration of local anatomy, adequacy of aortic arch exposure, level of distal aortic anastomosis, and in case of mediastinal tumors, extent of involvement of mediastinal structures. The LIV was divided between clamps, doubly ligated, and the ends oversewn. Patients were assessed at 1 month and at yearly intervals for upper extremity edema and neurologic symptoms. RESULTS: In 12 patients LIV division improved aortic arch access, and in 2 patients, it facilitated excision of mediastinal tumors. The mean age of patients was 56 years (range 22 to 80). Follow-up ranged from 1 week to 30 months. All patients had left upper extremity edema for 7 to 10 days, which resolved with arm elevation. One early patient required reexploration for bleeding from the LIV stump. One patient died because of multiorgan dysfunction. None had any residual left upper extremity edema or neurologic symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, although not uniformly or commonly necessary, division of the LIV can safely be utilized to facilitate aortic arch exposure without significant long-term morbidity. LIV reanastomosis is not necessary.     

Division of the left renal vein: a safe surgical adjunct

Ten patients have undergone surgical division of the left renal vein (LRV) during operations on the abdominal aorta. Nine were elective procedures performed during the resection of a complicated abdominal aortic aneurysm (six patients) or treatment of complete infrarenal aortic occlusion (three patients). The first patient in this series underwent emergency LRV ligation at the renal hilum for the control of hemorrhage incurred during an elective aneurysmectomy. This patient survived postoperative renal failure and myocardial infarction, but died 21 months later from another myocardial infarction. At the time of death, he had moderate renal insufficiency. None of the remaining nine patients undergoing elective LRV division experienced any apparent renal dysfunction, as measured by urine sediment, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and intravenous pyelography. Although not recommended as a routine maneuver, division of the LRV is advocated as a safe adjunct for surgical exposure in difficult aortic procedures.     

Division of the left renal vein. Guidelines and consequences.

Ligation and division of the left renal vein is a reasonable safe procedure in selected patients when exposure of the perirenal aorta is crucial. This manipulation is possible because of extensive venous collateralization from the left kidney in man. Measurement of the venous stump pressure before ligation is recommended to assess the degree of collateralization, and the upper limit within which the vein may be divided safely is probably in the neighborhood of 60 cm of water. Reanastomosis of the vein is not necessary for preservation of renal function, although transient left renal dysfunction may occur. Examination of the urine and careful monitoring of renal function should be routine in the postoperative period. Intravenous urography and left spermatic venography later in the postoperative course can indicate the ultimate degree of function of the left kidney and the pathways of venous collateralization. Preservation of normal function and venous architecture at the renal hilum should be the rule.     

Retroaortic left renal vein and inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm

The aim of this study was to report successful surgical management of an inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with a retroaortic left renal vein. The patient, a 78-year-old man, presented with diffuse abdominal pain, fever, and constipation. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed soft tissue surrounding the aneurysm and a left renal vein behind the aorta. Intraoperative findings confirmed the CT images. The patient is alive and well 6 months postoperatively.     

Fistula between abdominal aortic aneurysm and left renal vein

A 77-year-old man with spontaneous rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm into the left renal vein, in the presence of an anomalous retroaortic left renal vein is described. The patient was operated and recovered without complications. In the previous literature seven similar cases were found.     

Renal artery clamping and left renal vein division during abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether renal artery clamping and division of the left renal vein affects renal function in the patients who undergo repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Between 1992 and 2000, 267 patients had open surgery for infrarenal AAA. Of these, 22 (8%) required temporary bilateral (15) or unilateral (7) renal artery clamping. 8 also had the left renal vein divided, three of which were re-anastomosed. RESULTS: Renal artery clamping and/or renal vein divisions did not affect the incidence of complications and long term renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Clamping of the renal arteries and/or renal vein division during AAA surgery does not in itself compromise short or long term renal function.     

Double left renal vein associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Double left renal vein is a rare venous anomaly. We operated on 72-year-old man of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with double left renal vein. Massive hemorrhage was encountered during encircling the tape around the abdominal aorta. One vein passing posterior to the aorta was injured. Further dissection revealed the presence of double left renal vein forming a ring around the aorta. The patient underwent an abdominal aortic replacement following prompt repair of the injured vein. He had an uneventful postoperative course without renal complication. We missed that preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scan had demonstrated double left renal vein. Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT scan is useful and essential not only for evaluation of AAA, but also for establishing the presence of venous anomalies. Venous anomalies should be taken into consideration on the AAA operation.     

Glomerular filtration rate after left renal vein division and reconstruction during infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES: The study assessed the effect on postoperative renal function of left renal vein (LRV) division and reconstruction by direct reanastomosis or graft interposition during infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Between January 2001 and March 2006, 1189 patients underwent elective open repair of infrarenal AAAs. LRV division was performed in 15 (1.3%) and its reconstruction in all but one (LRV group), where the LRV was occluded. Patients' glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) were retrospectively estimated through postoperative day 4 by using the Cockcroft-Gault equation and compared with the GFRs of 56 controls undergoing AAA repair without LRV division (control group) randomly identified from a prospectively compiled database in a 4:1 ratio. Post hoc 1:1 case-matched analysis was also performed. Statistical analyses were performed as appropriate. RESULTS: Comparison of demographics and risk factors revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups with the exception of the following: AAAs were larger in LRV group (71.4 +/- 17.1 mm vs 56.0 +/- 14.6 mm; P = .003) and preoperative GFR was lower in LRV group (65.3 +/- 19.0 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 82.8 +/- 22.3 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .009). Postoperatively, the trend of GFR with time did not differ between groups (P = .33). The variation of GFR at day 4 after surgery compared with preoperative values was not different either (5.6 +/- 12.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 1.0 +/- 15.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .67). A further 1:1 case-matched multivariate analysis of variance, matching patients and controls by AAA size and preoperative GFR, showed no difference in trend of GFR with time between groups (P = .15). Operative time was not significantly longer in LRV group (148.4 +/- 35.8 minutes vs 131.0 +/- 40.3 minutes; P = .07). No differences between groups were found for blood loss (585.7 +/- 264.2 mL vs 567.7 +/- 222.5 mL; P = .88), perioperative complications (5 vs 8; P = .12), or hospital length of stay (6.2 +/- 1.8 days vs 5.5 +/- 1.2 days; P = .10). A 6-month follow-up of renal function available in 12 patients of LRV group showed no significant decrease in GFR compared with postoperative values (70.8 +/- 24.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs 69.1 +/- 23.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2); P = .86). At duplex scan, the reconstructed LRV could be insonated in nine of these 12 patients and all were patent. CONCLUSIONS: LRV division during AAA repair was associated with larger aneurysms and preoperative subclinical renal function impairment. In these patients, LRV reconstruction was associated with the maintenance of preoperative renal functional status without significantly lengthening of operative time or increasing the complications from surgery.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysm with aorta-left renal vein fistula with left varicocele

Abdominal aortic aneurysm with spontaneous aorto-left renal vein fistula is a rare but well-described clinical entity usually with abdominal pain, hematuria, and a nonfunctioning left kidney. This report describes a 44-year-old man with left-sided groin pain and varicocele who was treated with conservative measures only. The diagnosis was eventually made when he returned with microscopic hematuria, elevated serum creatinine level, and nonfunction of the left kidney; computed tomography scan demonstrated a 6-cm abdominal aortic aneurysm, a retroaortic left renal vein, and an enlargement of the left kidney. This patient represents the youngest to be reported with aorto-left renal vein fistula and the second case with a left-sided varicocele.     

Ligation of the renal vein during resection of abdominal aortic aneurysm

In resection of abdominal aortic aneurysm, ligation and division of the left renal vein may be necessary in order to expose the perirenal aorta. This manoeuvre is possible, with conservation of the left kidney function, because of the extensive venous collateral circulation of the left kidney. It is of crucial importance however, that ligation of the vein is performed close to the inferior vena cava. A case is presented where ligation of the left renal vein was performed in relation to an operation for a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. After the operation there was initially dysfunction of the left kidney, and later on sepsis-induced uraemia. The renal function stabilized at a moderately reduced level. No permanent kidney damage related to the venous ligation could be demonstrated. In the literature serious renal damage has been reported in 10 cases out of 89 reported ligations of the left renal vein. Ligation of the left renal vein is thus a reasonably safe and acceptable procedure for surgical exposure in difficult aortic procedures.     

Indirect re-implantation of the left coronary artery during aortic surgery

Abstract Objective: Indirect re‐implantation of the left coronary artery (LCA) via an interposition graft simplifies difficult LCA re‐implantation during aortic root replacement. Little information exists regarding the results of this technique. In this study, we report our experience. Methods: Between January 2001 and July 2008, of 82 aortic root replacements, 24 (mean age 48.2 years, 83% male) used the indirect re‐implantation technique. All case notes were retrospectively analyzed. Indications for operation were; aortic root aneurysm (n = 16), acute dissection (n = 6), existent homograft calcification (n = 1), failed Ross procedure (n = 1). Reasons for indirect re‐implantation were: difficult LCA mobilization secondary to previous cardiac surgery (n = 7), short left main stem (n = 6), acute dissection (n = 6), adherence to surrounding tissues (n = 5). All patients had yearly CT or MRI follow‐up. Results: Mechanical and tissue valved conduits were implanted in 22 and two patients, respectively. Ten millimeters (n = 17) or 8 mm (n = 7) Dacron grafts were used for LCA re‐implantation. Thirty‐day mortality was 12.5%. Postoperative complications were: re‐opening for bleeding (n = 2), pericardial effusion (n = 4), renal failure (n = 1). Over a median follow‐up of 26 months (range 4 to 81), one developed a false aneurysm at the right coronary artery anastomosis five months postoperatively, which was subsequently repaired. All interposition grafts remained patent on MRI or CT. There were six late deaths. At median follow‐up survival rate was 71%. Conclusions: The indirect re‐implantation of the LCA during aortic root replacements is a reliable, safe, and effective method in dealing with the LCA in difficult circumstances. Survival at 26 months is equivalent to other series of similar patients.     

Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava and left renal vein: implications during open abdominal aortic aneurysm reconstruction

Although uncommon and usually incidental findings on imaging or at operation, congenital anomalies of the retroperitoneal venous system, particularly those involving the inferior vena cava and left renal vein, can be troublesome and dangerous during open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). We have provided a retrospective analysis of our single tertiary institution experience with these anomalies during more than 2400 open AAA reconstructions in an effort to determine if preoperative identification of these vessels decreased venous injury and subsequent morbidity as well as offering a thorough review of the relevant embryology, anatomy, and technical approaches for each specified anomaly for the practicing vascular surgeon.     

Postpartum renal vein thrombosis with left retroaortic renal vein

An unusual case of thrombosis in a left retroaortic renal vein is presented. Noninvasive radiologic diagnosis is reviewed.