Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer.

Purpose: This study was designed to determine whether increasing the dose of doxorubicin in or adding paclitaxel to a standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer patients would prolong time to recurrence and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After surgical treatment, 3,121 women with operable breast cancer and involved lymph nodes were randomly assigned to receive a combination of cyclophosphamide (C), 600 mg/m(2), with one of three doses of doxorubicin (A), 60, 75, or 90 mg/m(2), for four cycles followed by either no further therapy or four cycles of paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2). Tamoxifen was given to 94% of patients with hormone receptor-positive tumors. Results: There was no evidence of a doxorubicin dose effect. At 5 years, disease-free survival was 69%, 66%, and 67% for patients randomly assigned to 60, 75, and 90 mg/m(2), respectively. The hazard reductions from adding paclitaxel to CA were 17% for recurrence (adjusted Wald chi(2) P =.0023; unadjusted Wilcoxon P =.0011) and 18% for death (adjusted P =.0064; unadjusted P =.0098). At 5 years, the disease-free survival (+/- SE) was 65% (+/- 1) and 70% (+/- 1), and overall survival was 77% (+/- 1) and 80% (+/- 1) after CA alone or CA plus paclitaxel, respectively. The effects of adding paclitaxel were not significantly different in subsets defined by the protocol, but in an unplanned subset analysis, the hazard ratio of CA plus paclitaxel versus CA alone was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.86) for those with estrogen receptor-negative tumors and only 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.07) for patients with estrogen receptor-positive tumors, almost all of whom received adjuvant tamoxifen. The additional toxicity from adding four cycles of paclitaxel was generally modest. Conclusion: The addition of four cycles of paclitaxel after the completion of a standard course of CA improves the disease-free and overall survival of patients with early breast cancer.     

Randomized parallel study of doxorubicin plus paclitaxel and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This randomized, noncomparative, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of combined doxorubicin plus paclitaxel (AP) and doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated breast cancer who were unsuitable for conservative surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 200 patients with T2-3, N0-1, M0 disease were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive preoperative chemotherapy with either doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion (AP) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (AC) every 3 weeks for 4 courses followed by surgery. RESULTS: A pCR (eradication of invasive carcinoma in tumor and in axillary lymph nodes) was found in 16% and 10% of patients in the AP and AC arms, respectively, by study center pathologists, and in 8% and 6% of patients, respectively, by independent pathologists. Patients with pCRs tended to have unifocal disease, tumors with negative hormonal receptor status, and less differentiation (Scarff, Bloom, and Richardson scale grade 3). Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 58% and 45% of patients in the AP and AC arms, respectively. An objective clinical response was achieved in 89% of patients in the AP arm and 70% in the AC arm. At a median follow-up of 31 months, disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients who reached pCR versus those without pCR (91% v 70%). CONCLUSION: The encouraging pathologic and clinical responses of patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin plus paclitaxel warrant additional investigation of paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant setting of breast cancer management.     

Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared primary neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. The need for preoperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin or taxanes may be reduced in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive tumors. This randomized, controlled, phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with endocrine treatment with aromatase inhibitors in postmenopausal women with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive breast cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive neoadjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/day (n = 61) or exemestane 25 mg/day (n = 60) for 3 months or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) with paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (four 3-week cycles). Study end points included overall objective response determined by palpation, mammography, and ultrasound, and the number of patients who qualified for breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. RESULTS: Clinical objective response was 64% in the endocrine therapy and chemotherapy treatment groups. Median time to clinical response was 57 and 51 days with aromatase inhibitors and chemotherapy, respectively (P > .05). Rates of pathological complete response (3% vs 6%) and disease progression (9% vs 9%) did not differ significantly in the endocrine therapy or chemotherapy group, respectively (P > .05). Rates of breast-conserving surgery were slightly higher in the endocrine group (33% vs 24%; P = .058). The most frequent toxicities from chemotherapy were alopecia (79%), grade 3/4 neutropenia (33%), and grade 2 neuropathy (30%). Endocrine treatment was well tolerated. No deaths occurred during the preoperative treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors was well tolerated and resulted in rates similar to chemotherapy in overall objective response and breast-conserving surgery in postmenopausal women with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive tumors.     

蒽环类为主序贯紫杉类新辅助化疗方案治疗三阴乳腺癌的临床观察

目的 探讨蒽环类为主序贯紫杉醇新辅助化疗方案治疗三阴乳腺癌的临床疗效和安全性.方法 将200例三阴乳腺癌患者按照化疗方案的差异分为观察组112例和对照组88例.对照组患者接受4个周期的CTF(环磷酰胺+阿霉素或表阿霉素+5-氟尿嘧啶)新辅助化疗方案,观察组在4个周期CTF化疗方案后序贯4个周期的紫杉醇,135mg/m2静脉滴注,滴注时间超过3h,用药之前使用抗过敏药物,21 d为1个周期.2组患者分别于化疗结束后2周进行改良乳腺癌根治术.观察比较2组的疗效.结果 观察组有效率(68.8％)显著高于对照组(52.3％)(P＜0.05),部分缓解率、稳定率和进展率无统计学差异(P＞0.05).2组患者不良反应的发生率均较高,但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).观察组肿瘤的转移率显著低于对照组(P＜0.05);复发率和死亡率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义.观察组5年生存率为82.1％,对照组5年生存率为75.0％,差异有统计学意义(P=0.028).结论 蒽环类为主序贯紫杉醇新辅助化疗方案治疗三阴乳腺癌能明显提高患者的有效率和5年生存率,且不增加患者的不良反应,值得临床推广使用.     

Risk of pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy and combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND: Some chemotherapy (CT) drugs, including taxanes, may enhance the effectiveness of radiation therapy (RT). However, combining these therapies may increase the incidence of radiation pneumonitis, a lung inflammation. In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated the incidence of radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated with RT and standard adjuvant CT by use of doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide, with and without paclitaxel. METHODS: Forty-one patients with breast cancer were treated with RT and adjuvant CT, including paclitaxel. Paclitaxel and RT (to breast-chest wall in all and lymph nodes in some) were delivered sequentially in 20 patients and concurrently in 21 patients. Paclitaxel was given weekly in some patients and every 3 weeks in other patients. The incidence of radiation pneumonitis was compared with that among patients in our database whose treatments did not include paclitaxel (n = 1286). The percentage of the lung volume irradiated was estimated. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to find covariates that may be associated with the observed outcomes. All P values were two-sided. RESULTS: Radiation pneumonitis developed in six of the 41 patients. Three patients received paclitaxel concurrently with RT, and three received it sequentially (P =.95). The mean percentage of lung volume irradiated was 20% in patients who developed radiation pneumonitis and 22% in those who did not (P =.6). For patients treated with CT including paclitaxel, the crude rate of developing radiation pneumonitis was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.6% to 29.2%). For patients treated with CT without paclitaxel, the crude rate of pneumonitis was 1.1% (95% CI = 0.2% to 2.3%). The difference between the crude rates with or without paclitaxel is highly statistically significant (P<.0001). The mean time to develop radiation pneumonitis in patients treated concurrently with RT and paclitaxel was statistically significantly shorter in patients receiving paclitaxel weekly than in those receiving it every 3 weeks (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: The use of paclitaxel and RT in the primary treatment of breast cancer should be undertaken with caution. Clinical trials with the use of combination CT, including paclitaxel plus RT, whether concurrent or sequential, must evaluate carefully the incidence of radiation pneumonitis.     

Association between HER2 status and response to neoadjuvant anthracycline followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy without trastuzumab in breast cancer

Background

We recently showed HER2-positive breast cancers are less likely to respond to neoadjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy. Here, we investigated whether HER2-positive breast cancers responded to sequential neoadjuvant anthracycline followed by paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimen in the absence of trastuzumab.

Methods

Women (n=372) with operable primary breast cancer initially received two cycles of neoadjuvant anthracyclines, the clinical tumor response was assessed, then patients were received four cycles of paclitaxel plus carboplatin regimen. All the patients did not received trastuzumab treatment in the neoadjuvant setting. HER2 status was determined by immunohistochemistry and/or by fluorescence in situ hybridization in core-biopsy breast cancer tissue obtained before the neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

Eighteen percent (67/372) of patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) in their breast. HER2-positive tumors had a significant higher pCR rate than HER2-negative tumors (33.0% versus 13.5%, P<0.001) in this cohort of 372 patients, and positive HER2 status remained an independent favorable predictor of pCR in a multivariate analysis [odds ratio (OR), 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18 to 4.36, P=0.015]. Furthermore, patients who responded to initial anthracycline regimens were more likely to respond to paclitaxel plus carboplatin than patients who did not (pCR, 27.2% versus 14.6%, P=0.005). Patients with HER2-positive tumors exhibited a significant higher pCR rate than did patients with HER2-negative tumors in both anthracycline response group (40.5% versus 20.0%, P=0.025) and anthracycline non-response group (28.3% versus 11.3%, P=0.002).

Conclusions

Under the circumstance of no trastuzumab treatment, women with HER2-positive cancers derive a large benefit from paclitaxel-carboplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.     

Evaluation of paclitaxel in adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with operable breast cancer: preliminary data of a prospective randomized trial.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel has significant antitumor activity in patients with metastaticbreast cancer who have been previously treated with or exposed to anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. In this prospective randomized trial, the role of paclitaxel was evaluated in an adjuvant setting to determine its impact on reducing the risk of recurrence in patients with operable breast cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Five hundred twenty-four patients were randomized to be treated either with 4 cycles of paclitaxel followed by 4 cycles of combination therapy with 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (Pac/FAC) or with 8 cycles of FAC alone. Patients with intact primary breast cancer received the initial 4 cycles of paclitaxel or 4 cycles of FAC in a neoadjuvant setting. Planned duration of therapy was the same in all patients. After completion of 8 cycles of chemotherapy, those patients who were > or =50 years and whose tumors were positive for estrogen receptors received tamoxifen for 5 years. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients have had a recurrence after a median follow-up of 60 months with a range of 5-89 months. Estimated disease-free survival at 48 months was 0.83 for FAC and 0.86 for Pac/FAC group. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.09). The overall estimated hazard ratio for Pac/FAC compared with FAC derived by fitting the Cox regression model and incorporating terms for prognostic factors was 0.66. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest that the addition of paclitaxel to a FAC regimen of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy may further reduce the risk of disease recurrence; however, differences were not statistically significant. At the time of this analysis, there have been 47 deaths. The survival data are too preliminary to permit meaningful evaluation of the impact of paclitaxel on mortality.     

Doxorubicin followed by sequential paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide versus concurrent paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide: 5-year results of a phase II randomized trial of adjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy for women with node-positive breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We conducted a randomized Phase II trial to directly compare toxicity, feasibility, and delivered dose intensities of two adjuvant dose-intensive regimens containing doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide for patients with node-positive breast carcinoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-two patients with resected breast carcinoma involving one or more ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes, were randomized to receive two different schedules of adjuvant chemotherapy using 14-day dosing intervals: either (a) three cycles of doxorubicin 80 mg/m(2) as i.v. bolus followed sequentially by three cycles of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) as a 24-h infusion and then by three cycles of cyclophosphamide 3.0 g/m(2) as a 1-h infusion (arm A); or (b) the same schedule of doxorubicin followed by three cycles of concurrent cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel at the same doses (arm B). All cycles were supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were assessable for toxicity and feasibility; 37 (90%) completed all planned chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality; however, increased toxicity was observed on arm B compared with arm A, manifested by an increase in hospitalization for toxicity, mainly neutropenic fever, and an increased incidence of transfusion of packed RBCs transfusions for anemia. The mean delivered dose intensities for paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide were significantly greater for arm A compared with arm B (P =.01 and P =.05, respectively). There is no long-term, treatment-related toxicity, and no cases of acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome have been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-dense sequential single-agent chemotherapy is more feasible than doxorubicin with subsequent concurrent paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide.     

Neoadjuvant concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in stage II/III breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and pathologic response rates following neoadjuvant paclitaxel and radiation in patients with stage II/III breast cancer and to evaluate the use of sequential biopsies to allow an in vivo assessment of biological markers as potential predictive markers of response to this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with high-risk, operable breast cancer were treated with three cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, followed by twice-weekly paclitaxel 30 mg/m2 and concurrent radiation. Core biopsies were obtained at baseline and 24 to 72 hours after the first cycle of paclitaxel. After completing neoadjuvant treatment, patients underwent definitive surgery. The primary end point was pathologic complete response, which is defined as the absence of any invasive cancer at surgery. Potential markers of therapeutic response were evaluated including markers of proliferation, apoptosis, p21, HER2, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients enrolled, 13 (34%) had a pathologic complete response. There was no significant difference in baseline Ki-67 between responders (35%) and nonresponders (28%; P = 0.45). There was also no significant change in Ki-67 following paclitaxel administration. Despite this lack of immunohistologic change in proliferative activity, baseline mitotic index was higher for patients with pathologic complete response over nonresponders (27 versus 10, P = 0.003). Moreover, the increase in mitotic index following paclitaxel administration was associated with pathologic complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant paclitaxel/radiation is effective and well tolerated. Tumor proliferation at baseline and response to chemotherapy as measured by mitotic activity may serve as an important indicator of pathologic response to neoadjuvant paclitaxel/radiation.     

Advances in the use of taxanes in the adjuvant therapy of breast cancer

Among the novel chemotherapeutic drugs introduced in the 1990s, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful compounds in breast cancer. Paclitaxel and docetaxel have been evaluated in the metastatic setting before proceeding with adjuvant trials. The adjuvant strategies of development of both taxanes have been different, mostly as a result of pharmacokinetic differences and dose-schedule issues. As a consequence, paclitaxel was studied nearly exclusively in sequential programs such as AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel or doxorubicin, followed by paclitaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide. In contrast, docetaxel has been investigated in sequence (AC followed by docetaxel) and in combination chemotherapy (doxorubicin/docetaxel and docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide). Available results of large-scale phase III trials confirm that the taxanes have the potential to change the natural history of early-stage breast cancer. It is becoming clear that sequential chemotherapy and polychemotherapy approaches with taxanes are to be considered in the treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer. Further results are eagerly awaited to fully understand the role of taxanes and to optimize their impact on early-stage breast cancer. It is our opinion that the real pending issue is no longer whether taxanes will make a difference in the adjuvant setting (the answer is most likely yes), but the definition of their optimal strategic use for maximum patient benefit.     

Increased efficacy of a dose-dense regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being increasingly used in the treatment of breast carcinoma. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of the results of neoadjuvant therapy in 376 breast carcinoma patients treated with three different regimens combining doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT), dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide with sequential weekly paclitaxel (DD AC-P), or the combination of trastuzumab with chemotherapy (DD AC-PT). The expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 was determined immunohistochemically. Pathological response was determined in 318 patients. Pathological complete response (pCR) was observed in 18% of patients. The pCR rate was significantly higher in patients treated with DD regimen (22 vs. 13%) and younger than 55 years (23 vs. 13%). The pCR rate was higher in patients with triple negative (TN) tumors (43%) and tumors over-expressing HER-2 (HER-2+; 28%) compared to patients with ER- or PR-positive tumors not expressing HER-2 (ER/PR + HER-2?; 6%). In patients with TN tumors pCR rate was significantly higher after treatment with DD AC-P compared to AT (61 vs. 22%, p = 0.005). pCR was associated with significantly improved relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), but when analysis was performed based on tumor phenotype, the difference was significant only in patients with TN tumors. In multivariate analysis, pCR, stage, and ER expression were significant predictors of RFS, while pCR, stage, ER and DD regimen were significant predictors of OS. In conclusion, present data indicate superiority of a DD regimen in obtaining pCR in patients with breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The difference in efficacy is due mostly to markedly higher pCR rate in patients with TN tumors.     

A phase I/II study of neoadjuvant liposomal doxorubicin,paclitaxel, and hyperthermia in locally advanced breast cancer

Purpose: The prognosis for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients continues to be poor, with an estimated five-year survival of only 50–60%. Preclinical data demonstrates enhanced therapeutic efficacy with liposomal encapsulation of doxorubicin combined with hyperthermia (HT). Therefore this phase I/II study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel neoadjuvant combination treatment of paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin, and hyperthermia.

Materials and methods: Eligible patients received four cycles of neoadjuvant liposomal doxorubicin (30–75 mg/m²), paclitaxel (100–175 mg/m²), and hyperthermia. They subsequently underwent either a modified radical mastectomy or lumpectomy with axillary node dissection followed by radiation therapy and then eight cycles of CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy.

Results: Forty-seven patients with stage IIB-III LABC were enrolled and 43 patients were evaluable. Fourteen patients (33%) had inflammatory breast cancer. Combined (partial + complete) clinical response rate was 72% and combined pathological response rate was 60%. Four patients achieved a pathologically complete response. Sixteen patients were eligible for breast-conserving surgery. The cumulative equivalent minutes (CEM 43) at T90 (tenth percentile of temperature distribution) was significantly greater for those with a pathological response. Four-year disease-free survival was 63% (95% CI, 46%–76%) and the four-year overall survival was 75% (95% CI, 58–86%).

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy using paclitaxel, liposomal doxorubicin and hyperthermia is a feasible and well tolerated treatment strategy in patients with LABC. The thermal dose parameter CEM 43 T90 was significantly correlated with attaining a pathological response.     

A prospective randomized pilot study to evaluate predictors of response in serial core biopsies to single agent neoadjuvant doxorubicin or paclitaxel for patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer can be correlated with long-term outcomes. Surrogate end-point biomarkers may be used to assess response to the treatment. Most reported studies assessed the effects of combination chemotherapy. We assessed the feasibility of obtaining serial core breast biopsies, and correlated rates of apoptosis, proliferation, and expression of related proteins at baseline, during, and after neoadjuvant single agent chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Women with a histologically confirmed unresected T(3) or T(4) infiltrating carcinoma of the breast were eligible. The first 20 patients received three cycles of doxorubicin 90 mg/m(2) followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2), or the reverse. Nine women received four cycles of each (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2)). Cycles were administered 14 days apart with filgastrim. End points included: (a). clinical and pathological response; (b). serial apoptotic [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt)-mediated nick end labeling] and proliferation (immunohistochemistry, IHC) rates; and (c). expression (IHC) of estrogen receptor, HER2, bcl2, and p53. RESULTS: From April 1997 to June 2001, 29 women were randomized. Twelve patients (42%) had a clinical complete response (cCR), and 16 (55%) had a clinical partial response. Five women (17%) had a pathological complete response, 7 (24%) had microscopic residual disease, and 17 (58%) had macroscopic residual disease. Higher baseline apoptosis and proliferation were associated with an improved pathological response (P = 0.006 and 0.003, respectively). Among 14 evaluable patients, apoptosis increased in women who had a cCR to the first agent but not in women without a cCR. Estrogen receptor-positive patients had a worse pathological response (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The selected regimen is efficacious. It is feasible to obtain serial core biopsies that are informative for studies of apoptosis and IHC. This clinical design can serve as a model for combining standard chemotherapy and novel agents.     

Adjuvant sequential dose-dense doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (ATC) for high-risk breast cancer is feasible in the community setting.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the feasibility, when given in the community, of dose-dense, sequential ATC (doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide) as adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with four or more metastatic axillary lymph nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited after definitive breast cancer surgery if four or more axillary nodes were involved by metastatic cancer and if distant metastases were not present on computed tomographic scan or bone scan. Forty patients received doxorubicin, 90 mg/m2 every 14 days for three cycles; paclitaxel, 250 mg/m2 every 14 days for three cycles; and cyclophosphamide, 3 g/m2 every 14 days for three cycles with filgrastim support. Chemotherapy was administered by the referring physician. RESULTS: Mean dose intensity was 99% for doxorubicin, 96% for paclitaxel, and 99% for cyclophosphamide. Grade 3 toxicities included mucositis (13%), nausea/vomiting (10%), neuropathy (13%), and myalgia/arthralgia (10%). Thirteen patients had neutropenic fever. One patient developed acute leukemia. Three relapses have occurred. Ninety percent of patients are alive and disease-free at a median follow-up of 24 months. DISCUSSION: ATC can be administered in the community at full doses with acceptable toxicity. Preliminary efficacy data suggest that this high-dose, intensively scheduled regimen warrants comparison with standard therapy for high-risk patients.     

Preoperative therapy with trastuzumab and paclitaxel followed by sequential adjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide for HER2 overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy improves outcomes for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpressing advanced breast cancer. We conducted a pilot study of preoperative trastuzumab and paclitaxel, followed by surgery and adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in earlier stage breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive (2+ or 3+ by immunohistochemistry) stage II or III breast cancer received preoperative trastuzumab (4 mg/kg x 1, then 2 mg/kg/wk x 11) in combination with paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks x 4). Patients received adjuvant doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy following definitive breast surgery. Clinical and pathologic response rates were determined after preoperative therapy. Left ventricular ejection fraction and circulating levels of HER2 extracellular domain were measured serially. RESULTS: Preoperative trastuzumab and paclitaxel achieved clinical response in 75% and complete pathologic response in 18% of the 40 women on study. HER2 3+ tumors were more likely to respond than 2+ tumors (84% v 38%). No unexpected treatment-related noncardiac toxicity was encountered. Four patients developed grade 2 cardiotoxicity (asymptomatic declines in left ventricular ejection fraction). Baseline HER2 extracellular domain was elevated in 24% of patients and declined with preoperative therapy. Immunohistochemical analyses of posttherapy tumor specimens indicated varying patterns of HER2 expression following trastuzumab-based treatment. CONCLUSION: Preoperative trastuzumab and paclitaxel is active against HER2 overexpressing early-stage breast cancer and may be feasible as part of a sequential treatment program including anthracyclines. The observed changes in cardiac function merit further investigation. Correlative analyses of HER2 status may facilitate understanding of tumor response and resistance to targeted therapy.     

Phase I study of paclitaxel (taxol) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (caelyx) administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES: Paclitaxel and doxorubicin are among the most active chemotherapeutic agents in various types of tumors. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) has a more favorable pharmacokinetic and toxicity profile than the free drug. We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) and the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of the combination administered every 2 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of escalating doses of Caelyx (12.5-17.5 mg/m2) administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion on day 1 and paclitaxel (90-115 mg/m2) as a 3-hour intravenous infusion on day 2 every 2 weeks without growth factor support. One cycle was considered as the administration of two consecutive treatments in 28 days. Twenty-six patients with histologically confirmed advanced stage solid tumors have been enrolled. Treatment was first-line treatment for 38% of patients, second-line for 31% and third-line for 31%. RESULTS: The DLT were evaluated during the first 4 weeks of treatment (2 treatment administrations) and consisted in all but one case of grade 2-3 neutropenia resulting in treatment delay. One patient died of cardiac arrest 1 day after the first treatment. A total of 86 cycles have been administered with only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia. Hematologic toxicity was generally mild. Only 1 patient at the first and another at the highest dose level developed grade 4 neutropenia. At the highest dose level, 3 of 6 patients developed grade 3 neutropenia. Grade 4 anemia or grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was not observed. Non-hematologic toxicity included grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting in 10%, grade 2-4 diarrhea in 7% and grade 2-3 neurotoxicity in 8% of cycles. Mucositis grade 3 complicated 1 cycle. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia grade 2-3 was observed in 3 patients and was the reason for treatment discontinuation in 1 patient. Cardiotoxicity as the development of congestive heart failure or more than 10% reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction was not observed. The most common non-hematologic toxicity was grade 2-3 asthenia complicating 31% of the cycles. Among 18 evaluable patients, 1 complete and 4 partial responses were observed primarily in patients with breast cancer. The MTD which are the recommended doses for further use in phase II trials were Caelyx 15 mg/m2 on day 1 and paclitaxel 115 mg/m2 on day 2 administered every 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: The administration of Caelyx and paclitaxel every 2 weeks is a feasible regimen and is associated with acceptable toxicity.     

Thermochemoradiotherapy improves oxygenation in locally advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to evaluate toxicity, response, and changes in oxygenation (pO(2)) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with concurrent taxol, hyperthermia (HT), and radiation therapy (RT) followed by mastectomy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eighteen patients with LABC were enrolled from October 1995 through February 1999. Treatment consisted of taxol (175 mg/m(2)) given every 3 weeks for three cycles. Radiation therapy included the breast and regional nodes with a dose of 50 Gy, followed by a boost to 60-65 Gy for those not undergoing surgery. Mastectomy was performed for patients deemed resectable after this neoadjuvant program. HT was administered twice per week. Oxygenation was measured before the first HT treatment and 24 h after the first HT treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen of 18 patients responded, 6 with a clinical complete response, 9 with a partial clinical response, and 3 nonresponders. Thirteen underwent mastectomy with 3 pathological complete responses. Tumor hypoxia was present in 8 of 13 patients (pO(2) = 4.7 +/- 1.2 mmHg). Five patients had well-oxygenated tumors (pO(2) = 27.6 +/- 7.8 mmHg). Patients with well-oxygenated tumors before treatment as well as those with significant reoxygenation had a favorable clinical response. Tumor reoxygenation appeared to be temperature dependent and associated with the lower thermal doses. CONCLUSIONS: This novel therapeutic program resulted in a high response rate in patients with LABC. Hyperthermia may offer a strategy for improving tumor reoxygenation with consequent treatment response. However, the effect of hyperthermia on tumor reoxygenation appears to depend on thermal dose and requires additional investigation.     

Prospective evaluation of paclitaxel versus combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare prospectively the antitumor activity of single-agent paclitaxel to the three-drug combination of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with operable breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T1-3N0-1M0 disease were randomized to receive either paclitaxel (250 mg/m(2)) as 24-hour infusion or FAC in standard doses at every-3-week intervals. Each patient was treated with four cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Clinical response and extent of residual disease in the breast and lymph nodes was assessed after four cycles of induction chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients were registered, and 87 were randomized to each arm of the study. Clinical response, ie, complete and partial responses, was similar in both arms of the study. Three patients in the FAC arm and one patient in the paclitaxel subgroup had progressive disease. The extent of residual disease by intent-to-treat analysis at the time of surgery was similar between the two arms of the study. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective study demonstrated that single-agent paclitaxel as neoadjuvant therapy has significant antitumor activity, and this was clinically comparable to FAC. Similar fractions of patients had clinical complete and partial responses, and very few patients had no response to either therapy. The value of alternate non-cross-resistant therapies as used in this protocol on the clinical course of this disease would require longer follow-up.     

Doxorubicin and paclitaxel versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10961 Multicenter Phase III Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) with a standard doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were anthracycline-naive and had bidimensionally measurable metastatic breast cancer. Two hundred seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to be treated with AT (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) as an intravenous bolus plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) as a 3-hour infusion) or AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. A paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m(2)) dose escalation was planned at cycle 2 if no grade >or= 3 neutropenia occurred in cycle 1. The primary efficacy end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate (RR), safety, overall survival (OS), and quality of life. RESULTS: A median number of six cycles were delivered in the two treatment arms. The relative dose-intensity and delivered cumulative dose of doxorubicin were lower in the AT arm. Dose escalation was only possible in 17% and 20% of the AT and AC patients, respectively. Median PFS was 6 months in the two treatments arms. RR was 58% versus 54%, and median OS was 20.6 versus 20.5 months in the AT and AC arms, respectively. The AT regimen was characterized by a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia, 32% versus 9% in the AC arm. CONCLUSION: No differences in the efficacy study end points were observed between the two treatment arms. Treatment-related toxicity compromised doxorubicin-delivered dose-intensity in the paclitaxel-based regimen     

High-dose paclitaxel in combination with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in patients with high-risk primary and responding metastatic breast carcinoma: toxicity profile, relationship to paclitaxel pharmacokinetics and short-term outcome

We assessed the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of high-dose infusional paclitaxel in combination with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue. Between October 1995 and June 1998, 63 patients with high-risk primary [stage II with >or= 10 axillary nodes involved, stage IIIA or stage IIIB inflammatory carcinoma (n = 53)] or with stage IV responsive breast cancer (n = 10) received paclitaxel 150-775 mg/m(2)infused over 24 hours, doxorubicin 165 mg/m(2)as a continuous infusion over 96 hours, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg kg(-1). There were no treatment-related deaths. Dose-limiting toxicity was reversible, predominantly sensory neuropathy following administration of paclitaxel at the 775 mg/m(2) dose level. Paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were non-linear at higher dose levels; higher paclitaxel dose level, AUC, and peak concentrations were associated with increased incidence of paraesthesias. No correlation between stomatitis, haematopoietic toxicities, and paclitaxel dose or pharmacokinetics was found. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 30-month event-free and overall survival for patients with primary breast carcinoma are 65% (95% CI; 51-83%) and 77% (95% CI; 64-93%). Paclitaxel up to 725 mg/m(2) infused over 24 hours in combination with with doxorubicin 165 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 100 mg kg(-1) is tolerable. A randomized study testing this regimen against high-dose carboplatin, thiotepa and cyclophosphamide (STAMP V) is currently ongoing.