The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The direct trocar technique is an alternative to Veress needle insertion and open laparoscopy for accessing the abdominal cavity for operative laparoscopy. We review our approach to abdominal entry in 1385 laparoscopies performed between September 1993 and June 2000 by our group at Stanford University Hospital, a tertiary Medical Center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 1385 patients who underwent operative laparoscopy during the study years. The mode of abdominal entry, patient demographics, and complications were reviewed. RESULTS: The transumbilical direct trocar entry method was used in 1223 patients. In 133 patients, the Veress needle insertion technique was used. Open laparoscopy was used in 22 patients. Three (0.21%) major complicadons occurred: 1 enterotomy, 1 omental herniation, and 1 bowel hemiation. One complication was related to primary access (0.072%) in a patient who had an open laparoscopy. She sustained an enterotomy during placement of the primary trocar. The bowel was repaired laparoscopically. No trocar-related injuries occurred among the 1223 patients in whom the direct trocar entry technique was used. One patient had an omental herniation and required a repeat laparoscopy on postoperative day 2. The second patient had a repeat laparoscopy on the 12th postoperative day to repair a bowel herniation. None of our patients required a laparotomy. No vascular injuries occurred. CONCLUSION: Based on our experience, the direct trocar technique is a safe approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopic surgery.     

A comparative study of postoperative adhesion formation after laparoscopic vs open cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence in the literature to support a lower incidence of adhesion formation following laparoscopic surgery rather than laparotomy. Adhesion formation after laparotomy has been well studied, but we believe that the decrease or absence of adhesions following laparoscopic surgery is underreported. Therefore, we set out to evaluate adhesion formation following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) compared with open cholecystectomy (OC). METHODS: Group A consisted of 18 patients who underwent a second laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an LC had already been performed. Group B consisted of eight patients who underwent laparoscopy due to various intraabdominal diseases after an open cholecystectomy performed at an earlier date. In both groups, the frequency, extent, and thickness of adhesions were evaluated according to a standardized scoring system. RESULTS: Ten patients in group A (55.5%) had no adhesion formation either on the treated side of the previous LC or on the trocar entry sites. Three patients (16.6%) had minimal adhesions on the treated side of the previous LC, but no adhesions were observed at the trocar entry sites. Five patients (27.7%) had loose, easily separable adhesions on the treated site of the previous LC and at the trocar entry sites. All eight patients in group B (100%) had thick and extensive adhesions either on the treated side of the previous open cholecystectomy or the anterior abdominal wall below the surgical incision. CONCLUSION: This comparative clinical study suggests that LC results in less adhesion formation, either on the operative or at the trocar entry sites, than open cholecystectomy.     

Accuracy of viscera slide detection of abdominal wall adhesions by ultrasound

Viscera slide is the normal, longitudinal movement of the intraabdominal viscera caused by respiratory excursions of the diaphragm. By detecting areas of restricted viscera slide, ultrasonic imaging was used to identify anterior abdominal wall adhesions prior to laparotomy or laparoscopy. Transcutaneous ultrasound examination was performed on 110 patients. A prediction of adhesions was made for each patient and then compared to the findings during subsequent laparotomy or laparoscopy. Only patients with previous abdominal surgery or history of peritonitis demonstrated adhesions. Sensitivity and specificity of viscera slide ultrasound in predicting adhesions were 90% and 92%. Nine out of 10 false results involved misinterpretation of ultrasound images of the lower one-third of the abdomen. Ultrasonic imaging of viscera slide is highly accurate in detecting abdominal wall adhesions. This technique is most useful in guiding the insertion of trocar in laparoscopic surgery, and as a noninvasive method in studying the formation of adhesions.     

Laparoskopie bei Dünndarmileus

Today laparoscopic procedures are routinely performed in patients with intestinal adhesions from previous abdominal surgery. Does laparoscopy have a potential benefit in acute small-bowel obstruction? Theoretically, a lower rate of wound complications and incisional hernias, as well as less subsequent adhesions with a lower incidence of recurrent intestinal obstruction, can be expected. However, laparoscopy is successful in only 50-70% of selected patients, thereby representing the highest rate of conversion in minimally invasive surgery. Laparoscopic management of severe abdominal distension with massively dilated and fragile small-bowel or dense adhesions is extremely difficult even when performed by experienced surgeons. Significantly prolonged operating time, the high risk of bowel injury (> 6-10%) and an increased frequency of early reoperations jeopardize the patient's safe outcome. However, in strictly selected patients the laparoscopic approach may be promising. In acute intestinal obstruction without a history of previous abdominal surgery, laparoscopy is--in the absence of adhesions--an excellent diagnostic tool and may also be a successful therapeutic modality in a variety of bowel-obstruction etiologies. Furthermore, the laparoscopic option should be considered in patients who previously had undergone small laparotomies (e.g., appendectomy) or laparoscopic surgery. We recommend "postlaparoscopic" intestinal obstruction as the ideal case for laparoscopic reexploration. Incarcerated hernias at the site of trocar insertion or adhesions due to peritoneal tears are easily identified as the cause of obstruction and successfully cured with the laparoscope. In conclusion, we advocate the laparoscopic approach in acute small-bowel obstruction exclusively for selected patients. Clinical studies are required to define appropriate surgical indications objectively.     

Technique of ultrasonic detection and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions

Summary A technique for noninvasive ultrasound examination to detect and map abdominal wall adhesions is described. The examination is based on the demonstration of movement of abdominal viscera during real-time imaging. This movement is called viscera slide and either occurs spontaneously as a result of respiratory movement or may be induced by manual compression. Abdominal wall adhesions produce a restriction of viscera slide. Ultrasonic demonstration of restricted viscera slide has been used for the precise localization and mapping of abdominal wall adhesions prior to abdominal surgery. The technique may be particularly useful in providing safe initial access in patients undergoing laparoscopy who are at increased risk for trocar injury of viscera due to abdominal wall adhesions resulting from previous surgery or peritonitis.     

Lateral approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the previously operated abdomen

BACKGROUND: In the past, prior abdominal surgery was often felt to be a contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The presence of adhesions precludes using a simple paraumbilical open approach for insufflation and initial trocar insertion because of an increased risk of bowel perforation and the difficulty in obtaining adequate exposure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report 32 consecutive patients with previous upper midline incisions who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholangiography and describe the technique and lateral positioning to facilitate this approach. RESULTS: In our series, there were no complications. The mean length of hospital stay was 1.3 days, and the conversion rate to an open procedure was 3%: one patient who had had 22 previous abdominal operations. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with the patient in the lateral position is safe and effective for patients who have had previous midline incisions.     

Reduction in visceral slide is a good sign of underlying postoperative viscero-parietal adhesions in children

Background/Purpose: Viscera stuck to the anterior abdominal wall from previous surgery risk injury during laparoscopic surgery. A prospective study was conducted to determine if these adhesions are detectable on ultrasound scan by showing a reduction in the normal visceral slide. Methods: Patients undergoing laparoscopic procedure after a previous laparotomy underwent preoperative real-time ultrasound scan to observe if viscera slides freely under the abdominal wall. A reduction in slide was considered a positive sign of underlying adhesions. These findings were correlated with the operative findings. Results: Anterior abdominal wall scans were performed on 17 children. Reduced visceral slide was seen in 10. Viscero-parietal adhesions were found in 9 of 10 patients. Visceral slide was reduced in a very localized area in 6 patients, and, in these, a loop of bowel (n [equals] 3), liver and bowel (n [equals] 2), or liver (n [equals] 1) was adherent. In 4, reduced visceral slide was seen over a wide area. Extensive adhesions were found in 3 of 4. One renal transplant patient with peritonitis had a false-positive ultrasound scan. At laparotomy there were no adhesions. The peritonitis is thought to have prevented an adequate examination. Seven patients had normal visceral slide. Of these, 4 had no adhesions, but 3 children had flimsy omental adhesions. The sensitivity and specificity of visceral slide in predicting adhesions were 75% and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: Reduction in visceral slide is a good sign of underlying postoperative viscero-parietal adhesions. Ultrasonographic mapping of the abdominal wall may be useful in selecting an adhesion-free site for trocar insertion in children with previous operations requiring laparoscopic procedures. J Pediatr Surg 38:714-716. [copy ] 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.     

Delayed recognition of inadvertent gut injury during laparoscopy

Bowel injuries, which may occur as a result of the insertion of an insufflation needle or trocar, are a rare complication of laparoscopy. They are generally recognized either immediately or a few days after the operation. We present a case of laparoscopic perforation of the small intestine in a patient who had undergone previous pelvic surgery for an ovarian carcinoma. On ultrasound (US), the patient had multiple hepatic lesions resembling hepatic metastases. To confirm the diagnosis, laparoscopy with guided liver biopsy was performed on the grounds that this procedure is regarded as more appropriate than CT- or US-guided hepatic biopsy. Veress needle and trocar insertion were performed at a proper distance from the abdominal scar. However, the abdominal cavity was not visible after the trocar's insertion due to the unexpected presence of adhesions. This precluded the continuation of the procedure. In the following days, the patient experienced only mild abdominal discomfort. However, 2 weeks after laparoscopy, the patient presented signs of peritoneal reaction and underwent laparotomy. Adhesion-fixing jejunal loops to the anterior abdominal wall were discovered at the site of the trocar puncture. Moreover, two hiatuses of these loops were observed and sutured. The follow-up was uneventful. As this case illustrates, laparoscopic bowel injuries remain an unpredictable event. Recognition of this complication may occur several days after the procedure, as the tamponating effect of adhesions on the jejunal hiatus delays the involvement of the peritoneum.     

Detection of abdominal wall adhesions using visceral slide

Background  

Abdominal surgery, peritonitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease often give rise to intra-abdominal adhesions. They may lead to chronic pain, infertility, bowel obstruction, etc. Development in surgical strategies in the last decade has resulted in an increase in laparoscopic procedures and, as a consequence, a steep rise in reported bowel lesions. Accordingly, noninvasive diagnostic tools are desirable to identify adhesions before abdominal surgery. This study was designed to validate transabdominal ultrasonography (TAU) and magnetic resonance imaging (cine MRI) for detection of abdominal wall adhesions.     

Laparoscopic reintervention in colorectal surgery

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery has developed in the 1990's and beginning of 2000. The favourable results and great progress in the development of laparoscopic techniques have expanded the indications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. More and more complicated colorectal cases are treated laparoscopically, including those having had previous laparotomies. Surgical reinterventions after colorectal procedures are common. Reinterventions are either intended to treat complications of colorectal surgery or to treat colorectal disease after previous abdominal or pelvic surgery. Laparoscopic reinterventions face surgeons with specific challenges related to morphological changes in the abdomen. Adhesions are primarily responsible for these changes and evoke various complications such as trocar injury, bleeding, enterotomy and conversion to laparotomy. Trocars and Veress needle are responsible for up to half of all bowel injuries in laparoscopic surgery and adhesion formation is the most important risk factor for bowel injury. The risks of adhesions are often underestimated. The first clinical results on laparoscopic reinterventions are promising. Routine use of anti-adhesion agents and diagnostics is advocated to prevent adhesion formation and make reintervention more safe reducing serious complications as inadvertent enterotomy, bleeding and trocar injuries. More research is needed to develop better tools for mapping adhesions, as none of the trocar placing techniques can rule out bowel injury. Improved diagnostic tools for mapping adhesions will also facilitate patient selection for laparoscopic treatment of SBO.     

Previous abdominal operations do not affect the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Background Previous abdominal surgery has been regarded as a relative contraindication for laparoscopic surgery. However, studies on laparoscopic cholecystectomy have showed that the presence of prior abdominal procedures does not affect the outcomes of surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of previous abdominal surgery on laparoscopic colorectal surgery.Methods This study enrolled 295 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery from May 2000 to May 2003. The patients were divided into two groups: those with previous abdominal surgery (n = 84) and those without a prior operation (n = 211). The outcomes of surgery for the two groups were compared with respect to the duration of surgery, blood loss, conversion rate, time to return of bowel function, resumption of diet, complications, and the hospital stay.Results The study included 158 men and 137 women. The median age of the patients was 70 years (range, 33-91 years). Significantly more female patients and patients with benign diseases had prior abdominal surgery. Conversion was required for 17.8% of the patients with and 11.4% of the patients without previous surgery (p = 0.181). There were no differences in the operating time or blood loss between the two groups. The time to bowel movement and resumption of diet were similar in the two groups. The median hospital stay was 7 days for both groups. Of the 39 conversions, 28.2% were necessitated mainly by the presence of adhesions. In the patients who underwent conversion because of adhesions (n = 11), nine had prior surgery and two did not (p = 0.001).Conclusions The presence of prior surgery does not affect the operating time or blood loss of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The conversion rate is not increased for patients with prior surgery. The postoperative outcomes in terms of ileus, complication rate, and hospital stay are not worse for patients with prior surgery. Previous abdominal surgery should not be considered as a contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.     

术后腹膜壁层粘连对腹腔镜穿刺安全性的影响

目的　探讨腹部手术后腹膜壁层粘连对腹腔镜穿刺安全性的影响。方法　回顾性分析 13年 810例腹腔镜手术中 12 6例有腹部手术史患者既往腹部手术情况、腹腔镜穿刺方法。结果　腹腔镜下发现 12 6例发生盆、腹腔粘连 3 2例 ,发生率为 2 5 .4% ( 3 2 /12 6)。该 3 2例中附件手术(宫外孕或卵巢囊肿手术 ) 16例 ( 5 0 .0 % ) ,子宫手术 (剖宫产或肌瘤挖出术 ) 10例 ( 3 1.3 % ) ,阑尾切除术 4例 ( 12 .5 % ) ,腹腔镜手术 2例 ( 6.2 % ) ,胆囊切除术后无腹腔粘连。 3 2例术后粘连根据粘连部位划分 ,腹膜壁层粘连 18例 ( 5 6.3 % ) ,原手术部位粘连 14例 ( 4 3 .7% )。无穿刺并发症发生。结论　腹部手术后部分病例腹膜壁层合并大网膜及肠管粘连 ,增加了腹腔镜穿刺的危险 ,但腹部手术史不应成为腹腔镜手术的禁忌证。详细了解既往手术史 ,正确选择第一穿刺部位 ,注意操作 ,是腹腔镜手术穿刺成功的关键     

Results after laparoscopic lysis of adhesions and placement of seprafilm for intractable abdominal pain

Background: The surgical treatment of patients with chronic abdominal pain resulting from intraabdominal adhesions is controversial. We report our experience with treatment of this challenging patient population using laparoscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) and placement of Seprafilm (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA, USA). Methods: The participants in this study were 19 consecutive patients (2 men and 17 women) who underwent laparoscopic LOA and placement of Seprafilm between July 1998 and July 2001. Patients with abdominal pain resulting from irritable bowel syndrome, hernias, or endometriosis were excluded. The patients had undergone a mean of 6.4 previous abdominal procedures (range, 1–14) and 2.3 previous LOAs (range, 0–10). They had experienced chronic, intractable abdominal pain for at least 4 months (range, 4–180). Eight patients had preoperative obstructive symptoms. Results: A completely laparoscopic procedure was used to treat 16 patients, whereas the procedure for 3 patients was converted to open surgery because of dense adhesions. Perioperative complications included two patients in whom enterocutaneous fistulae developed and one patient with intraabdominal hematoma. At follow-up (mean, 9.6 months; range, 1–32 months), 14 patients (73.7%) had completely discontinued all pain medications. At this writing, 12 of these patients are completely symptom free. Two patients are taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as needed, and three patients require round-the-clock narcotics. Three patients were readmitted with small bowel obstruction, which was managed nonoperatively. One patient had diagnostic laparoscopy for recurrent pain 6 months postoperatively, but had no adhesions. Conclusion: Chronic intractable abdominal pain is relieved in most patients via this approach. Repeat laparoscopy in two patients showed no intraabdominal adhesions. Laparoscopic LOA and placement of Seprafilm is an excellent approach to this challenging patient population with symptoms caused by intraabdominal adhesions.     

Laparoscopic approach to acute small bowel obstruction: Review of 1061 cases

Background Acute small bowel obstruction has previously been considered a relative contraindication for laparoscopic management. As experience with laparoscopy grows, more surgeons are attempting laparoscopic management for this indication. The purpose of this study is to define the outcome of laparoscopy for acute small bowel obstruction through an analysis of published cases. Methods A literature search of the Medline database was performed using the key words laparoscopy and bowel obstruction. Further articles were identified from the reference lists of retrieved literature. Only English language studies were reviewed. We excluded studies that included patients with chronic abdominal pain, chronic recurrent small bowel obstruction, or gastric or colonic obstruction, when the data specific to acute small bowel obstruction could not be extracted. Data was analyzed based on an intention to treat. Results Nineteen studies from between 1994 and 2005 were identified. Laparoscopy was attempted in 1061 patients with acute small bowel obstruction. The most common etiologies of obstruction included adhesions (83.2%), abdominal wall hernia (3.1%), malignancy (2.9%), internal hernia (1.9%), and bezoars (0.8%). Laparoscopic treatment was possible in 705 cases with a conversion rate to open surgery of 33.5%. Causes of conversion were dense adhesions (27.7%), the need for bowel resection (23.1%), unidentified etiology (13.0%), iatrogenic injury (10.2%), malignancy (7.4%), inadequate visualization (4.2%), hernia (3.2%), and other causes (11.1%). Morbidity was 15.5% (152/981) and mortality was 1.5% (16/1046). There were 45 reported recognized intraoperative enterotomies (6.5%), but less than half resulted in conversion. There were, however, nine missed perforations, including one trocar injury, often resulting in significant morbidity. Early recurrence (defined as recurrence within 30 days of surgery) occurred in 2.1% (22/1046). Conclusion Laparoscopy is an effective procedure for the treatment of acute small bowel obstruction with acceptable risk of morbidity and early recurrence.     

The ultrasonic localization of abdominal wall adhesions

Laparoscopic candidates with abdominal scars may have adhesions that result in visceral injury during trocar insertion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of preoperative ultrasound mapping of abdominal wall adhesions, to provide safe initial laparoscopic access, and to guide the placement of subsequent trocars, facilitating adhesolysis when necessary. Thirty consecutive patients with previous abdominal surgery who were scheduled for laparoscopy underwent a preoperative ultrasonic examination of the abdominal wall using a 7-MHz linear ultrasound probe. Spontaneous viscera slide was measured during longitudinal scanning (normal=2–5 cm) and induced viscera slide was evaluated during longitudinal and transverse scanning (normal=1 cm or more) over the existing abdominal scar, the peri-umbilical region, and the remaining abdominal quadrants. Sixteen (53%) of 30 patients had adhesions under their scar and only four patients (25%) had umbilical adhesions. The 12 patients without umbilical adhesions all had successful closed cannulation while open cannulation at alternate sites was successful in the four individuals with umbilical adhesions. Blind umbilical needle cannulation was successfully done in all of the remaining 14 patients (47%) without visceral injury, including three patients (21%) with upper abdominal scars who were adhesion-free elsewhere. No adhesions were encountered that had not been preoperatively predicted by ultrasound. We conclude that examination of the abdominal wall with spontaneous and induced viscera slide, using ultrasound scanning, can reliably detect intraabdominal adhesions. The examination is best done on a highly selective basis by the operating surgeon to guide the location for initial trocar insertion and determine the type of abdominal wall cannulation in those individuals with previous abdominal scars.Presented at the annual meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Nashville, TN 18–19 April 1994     

Safety of Veress needle for laparoscopic entry in children: Myth or reality?

IntroductionRecent reports suggested that blind laparoscopic entry techniques, including Veress needle (VN), might increase the risks of potentially fatal complications.Materials and methodsAll consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopy in two Pediatric Hospitals with the use of a Veress needle during a 14-year period have been included. In all cases the first trocar was a radially expanding one (STEP). Complications related to the insertion technique are reported as well as those related to the whole laparoscopic technique.ResultsA total of 3463 patients younger than 18 years of age underwent laparoscopy between January 2006 and December 2019. Of these, 205 (5.9%) were younger than 6 months of age at surgery. Two-hundred-eighty-four patients (8.2%) previously underwent abdominal surgery. During first trocar insertion no major or minor vascular injuries occurred. Two patients (0.06%) experienced bowel lesions. Nine (0.26%) experienced failed entry. Fourteen patients (0.4%) experienced postoperative issues related to trocars positioning, namely, 9 omental eviscerations through port site insertion and 5 cases of hemoperitoneum owing to epigastric vessels lesion during operative trocar positioning. No other issues strictly related to laparoscopic entry technique have been recorded during the study period. No specific risk factors predisposing to complications have been identified but the presence of a positive history of previous abdominal procedures proved to be significantly related to a higher occurrence of bowel injury during Veress needle insertion (p = 0.0067).Discussion and conclusionsAlthough with a number of biases and limitations, our study suggests that creation of pneumoperitoneum with VN combined to first trocar entry with STEP technology in children can represent a safe alternative. An exception is represented by patients who underwent previous abdominal surgeries who should be approached with caution, possibly with an open approach. Anyway, given the relatively poor quality of high-quality studies on this regard, we strongly support the implementation of well-designed RCT in children in order to answer this delicate topic.Type of studyRetrospective.Level of evidenceIV     

Prevention of adhesions by bioresorbable tissue barrier following laparoscopic intraabdominal mesh insertion

Intraabdominal adhesions represent a significant problem because of the morbidity associated with adhesive disease, including small bowel obstruction, difficulties in reoperative surgery, and possibly chronic pain. Coating solution of sodium hyaluronate (Sepracoat; Genzyme Production-Surgical Products, Cambridge, MA) was studied in New Zealand white rabbits to determine its potential role for prevention of postoperative adhesions following laparoscopic intraabdominal mesh insertion. A 2-cm polypropylene mesh was inserted laparoscopically to the left iliac fossa and fixed to anterior abdominal wall using a single prolen suture. Group 1 (n = 10) acted as the control group. Mesh was coated using 4% sodium hyaluronate in phosphate buffered saline (Sepracoat) in Group 2 (n = 10). Fourteen days later, all animals underwent diagnostic laparoscopy, and findings were recorded. All animals then were killed, the abdominal cavities were inspected, and adhesions were graded from 0 to 4. All meshes were removed and sent for histologic examination. The degrees of inflammation, fibrosis, and congestion were scored. No adhesions were seen on trocar sites on both groups. Eight of 10 animals in the control group and 5 of 10 animals in the study group had intraabdominal adhesions. The scoring of adhesions revealed that study group had only one (10%) significant adhesion, whereas the control group had eight (80%; < 0.001). Our study suggests that the Sepracoat reduces the incidence and severity of abdominal adhesions following laparoscopic mesh insertion and should be considered as a prophylactic agent, especially in those undergoing laparoscopic transabdominal mesh repair for hernia.     

Laparoscopic Lysis of Adhesions

Background Intra-abdominal adhesions constitute between 49% and 74% of the causes of small bowel obstruction. Traditionally, laparotomy and open adhesiolysis have been the treatment for patients who have failed conservative measures or when clinical and physiologic derangements suggest toxemia and/or ischemia. With the increased popularity of laparoscopy, recent promising reports indicate the feasibility and potential superiority of the minimally invasive approach to the adhesion-encased abdomen. Methods The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic adhesiolysis and to provide technical tips that help in the success of this technique. Results The most important predictive factor of adhesion formation is a history of previous abdominal surgery ranging from 67%–93% in the literature. Conversely, 31% of scars from previous surgery have been free of adhesions, whereas up to 10% of patients without any prior surgical scars will have spontaneous adhesions of the bowel or omentum. Most intestinal obstructions follow open lower abdominopelvic surgeries such as colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy. The most common complications associated with adhesions are small bowel obstruction (SBO) and chronic pain syndrome. The treatment of uncomplicated SBO is generally conservative, especially with incomplete obstruction and the absence of systemic toxemia, ischemia, or strangulation. When conservative treatment fails, surgical options include conventional open or minimally invasive approaches; the latter have become increasing more popular for lysis of adhesions and the treatment of SBO. Generally, 63% of the length of a laparotomy incision is involved in adhesion formation to the abdominal wall. Furthermore, the incidence of ventral hernia after a laparotomy ranges between 11% and 20% versus the 0.02%–2.4% incidence of port site herniation. Additional benefits of the minimally invasive approaches include a decreased incidence of wound infection and postoperative pneumonia and a more rapid return of bowel function resulting in a shorter hospital stay. In long-term follow up, the success rate of laparoscopic lysis of adhesions remains between 46% and 87%. Operative times for laparoscopy range from 58 to 108 minutes; conversion rates range from 6.7% to 43%; and the incidence of intraoperative enterotomy ranges from 3% to 17.6%. The length of hospitalization is 4–6 days in most series. Conclusions Laparoscopic lysis of adhesions seems to be safe in the hands of well-trained laparoscopic surgeons. This technique should be mastered by the advanced laparoscopic surgeon not only for its usefulness in the pathologies discussed here but also for adhesions commonly encountered during other laparoscopic procedures.     

The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Previous Abdominal Surgery

A retrospective study was carried in 1500 patients submitted to elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy to ascertain its feasibility in patients with previous abdominal surgery. In 411 patients (27.4%) previous infraumbilical intraperitoneal surgery had been performed, and 106 of them (7.06%) had 2 or more operations. Twenty five patients (1.66%) had previous supraumbilical intraperitoneal operations (colonic resection, hydatid liver cysts, gastrectomies, etc.) One of them had been operated 3 times. In this group of 25 patients the first trocar and pneumoperitoneum were performed by open laparoscopy. In 2 patients a Marlex mesh was present from previous surgery for supraumbilical hernias. Previous infraumbilical intraperitoneal surgery did not interfere with laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even in patients with several operations. There was no morbidity from Verres needle or trocars. In the 25 patients with supraumbilical intraperitoneal operations, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was completed in 22. In 3, adhesions prevented the visualization of the gallbladder and these patients were converted to an open procedure. In the 2 patients Marlex mesh prevented laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of adhesions to abdominal organs. We conclude that in most instances previous abdominal operations are no contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

One-trocar laparoscopy

Background: The aim of this paper is to show the efficacy of laparoscopy using only one umbilical trocar to treat abdominal complications of hydrocephalic children with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS). Materials and Methods: In a 15-year period, 14 laparoscopies were performed on as many children with VPS complications: in the last 4 patients only one trocar was used to solve the complications, and this subgroup will be the object of the present study. Concerning the indication for surgery, the patients presented one catheter lost in the abdominal cavity; one cerebrospinal fluid pseudocysts; one bowel obstruction; and one malfunctioning peritoneal limbs of the catheter. We used the one-trocar laparoscopic approach in all the 4 patients, and the 10-mm trocar was always introduced through the umbilical orifice in open laparoscopy. Results: The laparoscopic technique was curative in all four cases and permitted the solution of the complication. Conclusions: One-trocar laparoscopic surgery can be considered as the ideal procedure in case of abdominal complications of VPS in children with hydrocephalus.