Initial treatment of melanoma brain metastases using gamma knife radiosurgery: an evaluation of efficacy and toxicity

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is the primary malignancy that is most likely to metastasize to the brain. Because such an event carries an almost uniformly poor prognosis, the current study reviewed outcomes and identified associated prognostic indicators for 51 consecutive patients receiving gamma knife (GK) radiosurgery in the initial treatment of 188 intracranial melanoma metastases. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively from a single-center GK radiosurgery database and from primary patient medical records and radiographs. RESULTS: At presentation, 71% of patients had multiple intracranial metastases, and extracranial metastases were present in 66% of patients. Thirty-two patients (63%) were initially treated with GK radiosurgery alone, whereas the remainder received GK radiosurgery in combination with surgery and/or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Overall median survival from time of GK radiosurgery was 26 weeks. Subgroup analysis revealed a median survival of 77 weeks for patients presenting with a single lesion, compared with 20 weeks for patients presenting with multiple lesions (P = 0.003). Patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) Class I survived a median of 57 weeks, compared with a median survival of 20 weeks for patients in RPA Class II or III (P = 0.002). Although long-term imaging follow-up revealed that a majority of patients experienced distant brain metastases, multivariate analysis showed that distant metastases occurred significantly sooner in patients with extracranial metastases (P = 0.0004). Addition of initial WBRT had no significant effect on the time to development of new brain metastases (P = 0.13). Local control (crude) was observed in 81% of lesions initially treated with GK. Patients experienced improved or stable symptoms for a median of 37 weeks post-GK radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Survival analyses supported the use of GK radiosurgery in the initial treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastases, with best results occurring in patients presenting with a single lesion.     

Treatment options for brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Opinion statement Brain metastases are a common complication for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the past, treatment of brain metastases and lung cancer focused on symptom palliation with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and steroids because of the grim outlook for patients. However, recent advances in technology and surgical techniques have created more options for the management of brain metastases, which include surgery, irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and chemotherapy. These aggressive approaches have resulted in an improvement of neurologic outcomes and survival rates of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be divided into three groups: solitary CNS metastases with controlled or controllable primary disease, oligometastatic disease (fewer than three metastases), and multiple metastases. For patients with solitary CNS metastases, long-term survival is possible. A radical treatment approach involving surgical resection or radiosurgery, followed by WBRT, is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease, surgical resection or radiosurgery is considered in selected cases and WBRT is indicated. For patients with multiple metastases, WBRT is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease and patients with multiple metastases, recent evidence indicates that systemically effective chemotherapy may produce responses and can be instituted safely before radiotherapy. The treatment timing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be individualized.     

Treatment options for brain metastases in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Brain metastases are a common complication for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In the past, treatment of brain metastases and lung cancer focused on symptom palliation with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and steroids because of the grim outlook for patients. However, recent advances in technology and surgical techniques have created more options for the management of brain metastases, which include surgery, irradiation, stereotactic radiosurgery, and chemotherapy. These aggressive approaches have resulted in an improvement of neurologic outcomes and survival rates of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Central nervous system (CNS) metastases can be divided into three groups: solitary CNS metastases with controlled or controllable primary disease, oligometastatic disease (fewer than 3 metastases), and multiple metastases. For patients with solitary CNS metastases, long-term survival is possible. A radical treatment approach involving surgical resection or radiosurgery, followed by WBRT, is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease, surgical resection or radiosurgery is considered in selected cases and WBRT is indicated. For patients with multiple metastases, WBRT is recommended. For patients with oligometastatic disease and those with multiple metastases, recent evidence indicates that systemically effective chemotherapy may produce responses and can be instituted safely before radiotherapy. The treatment timing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy should be individualized.     

Treatment of brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): radiotherapy

Brain metastases occur frequently in lung-cancer patients and are associated with a crucial decrease in prognosis and impairment of Life quality. With improved treatment and earlier diagnosis of primary tumour as well as earlier detection of lesions due to improved neuroradiological diagnosis the incidence is apparently increasing. Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) prolongs median survival from 1 to 3-6 months. One-year survival rate after WBRT is approximately 10-20%. Neurological function could be improved with minimal morbidity. However, long-term survival is observed in patients with favourable prognostic factors like controlled primary tumour site, no extracranial disease, good performance status and age <60 years. In these patients individually optimised aggressive treatment strategies are clearly justified. Surgical resection or radiosurgery (RS) combined with adjuvant WBRT prolong survival to approximately 8-11 months. Surgical resection is preferred when rapid relief of increased intracranial pressure is required. The incidence of new brain metastases is low in patients with poor prognostic factors. Palliative RS could be used in these patients to rapidly improve neurological deficits. In locally advanced NSCLC radiosurgery may be used to effectively control brain disease without delay in treatment of the primary tumour site. The role of prophylactic ("elective") cranial irradiation in NSCLC patients as well as the role of combined radiochemotherapy for brain metastases has to be addressed in further clinical trials in the future.     

Radiosurgery for brain metastases at the Royal Adelaide Hospital: Are we treating the right patients?

Although non‐randomized data strongly suggest improved outcome from radiosurgery (RS) for brain metastases relative to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone, selection factors account for much of the observed differences. This retrospective review of the 16 brain metastases patients treated so far with RS at the Royal Adelaide Hospital confirms a median survival of 10.1 months, consistent with recent multi‐institutional pooled results and significantly longer than the median survival of 3?6 months typically reported for WBRT alone. The emerging randomized trials comparing surgery, RS and WBRT for brain metastases are reviewed in the context of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Recursive Partitioning Analysis prognostic Class concept in order to assess whether we are using this resource intensive technique to treat the ‘right’ patients. We conclude that it is reasonable to continue our current policy of considering RS primarily for patients of good performance status with solitary brain metastases. We have a flexible approach to adjuvant WBRT which appears to decrease brain relapse, but not improve survival.     

Multimodality management of brain metastases in metastatic melanoma patients

Brain metastases are a frequent complication of advanced melanoma. Neurosurgery (generally followed by radiotherapy) may be useful in managing solitary, superficial brain metastases in good performance status patients, as well as for diagnostic purposes. Since most patients are not felt to be resectable and concurrent extracranial metastases frequently are present, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has become the de facto treatment standard. WBRT has resulted in disappointing outcomes, resulting in a 3.6-4.1-month median survival. Recent studies have suggested that focal irradiation using linear accelerator-based stereotactic radiosurgery or gamma-knife technologies can result in excellent local control and prolonged survival in some patients. It is possible that more aggressive combined modality treatment strategies, such as addition of systemic therapy, may further improve outcome. Current data suggest that aggressive treatment of patients with up to five brain melanoma brain metastases is capable of producing prolonged survival in many patients, including some long-term complete responses.     

The Role of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy for the Management of Brain Metastases in the Era of Stereotactic Radiosurgery

The goals of treatment for brain metastases (BMs) include preservation of function and improvement of survival. Although whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been a mainstay in the treatment of BMs, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) monotherapy has been increasingly used because of concern about the deterioration of neurocognitive function as a late adverse effect of WBRT. The results of four randomized controlled trials comparing focal treatment alone versus focal treatment combined with WBRT have shown, however, that SRS monotherapy significantly increases the risk of brain tumor recurrence (BTR) and that this increased risk of BTR may cause deterioration of neurocognitive function. We suggest identifying patients according to their risk of BTR when selecting treatment. Patients who have solitary BM with the absence of extracranial metastases may be indicated for SRS monotherapy given the lower risk of BTR compared with those having multiple BMs or extracranial metastases.     

Radiosurgery for brain metastases: is whole brain radiotherapy necessary?

PURPOSE: Because whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) may cause dementia in long-term survivors, selected patients with brain metastases may benefit from initial treatment with radiosurgery (RS) alone reserving WBRT for salvage as needed. We reviewed results of RS +/- WBRT in patients with newly diagnosed brain metastasis to provide background for a prospective trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with single or multiple brain metastases managed initially with RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (62 vs. 43 patients) from 1991 through February 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. The use of upfront WBRT depended on physician preference and referral patterns. Survival, freedom from progression (FFP) endpoints, and brain control allowing for successful salvage therapy were measured from the date of diagnosis of brain metastases. Actuarial curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Analyses to adjust for known prognostic factors were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model (CPHM) stratified by primary site. RESULTS: Survival and local FFP were the same for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (median survival 11.3 vs. 11.1 months and 1-year local FFP by patient 71% vs. 79%, respectively). Brain FFP (scoring new metastases and/or local failure) was significantly worse for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (28% vs. 69% at 1 year; CPHM adjustedp = 0.03 and hazard ratio = 0.476). However, brain control allowing for successful salvage of a first failure was not significantly different for RS alone vs. RS + WBRT (62% vs. 73% at 1 year; CPHM adjusted p = 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: The omission of WBRT in the initial management of patients treated with RS for up to 4 brain metastases does not appear to compromise survival or intracranial control allowing for salvage therapy as indicated. A randomized trial of RS vs. RS + WBRT is needed to assess survival, quality of life, and cost in good-prognosis patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases.     

The treatment of brain metastases in melanoma patients

The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with melanoma ranges from 10% to 40% in clinical studies and is even higher in autopsy series with as many as two-thirds of patients with metastatic melanoma having CNS involvement. Treatment options for patients with cerebral metastases are limited and depend largely on the number and the size of the lesions and on the extracranial extension of metastatic disease. This report gives the results of different treatment modalities in patients with melanoma metastases to the brain. As data from prospective randomized studies are lacking, the general recommendations based on clinical series reports are: (i) the combination of surgery and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is superior to WBRT alone for the treatment of single brain metastasis in patients with limited or absent systemic disease and good neurological condition. (ii) Radio surgery, alone or in conjunction with WBRT, yields results which are comparable to those reported after surgery followed by WBRT, provided that the lesion's diameter does not exceed 3 cm. With the use of WBRT after surgery or radio surgery the local control seems better (with the combined approach), but the overall survival does not improve. (iii) WBRT alone or in combination with chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in patients with single brain metastasis not amenable to surgery or radio surgery, with an active systemic disease, and in patients with multiple brain metastases. Chemotherapy may be also offered to patients with a good performance status, or after recurrence to local therapy.     

Surgical management of single and multiple brain metastases: results of a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Advancement in diagnosis and treatment of various cancer entities led to an increasing incidence of brain metastases in the last decades. Surgical excision of single and multiple brain metastases is one of the central treatment options beside radiotherapy, radiosurgery and chemotherapy. To evaluate the benefit of surgery with/without whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in single brain metastases and the influence of image guidance for brain metastases resection, 104 patients were retrospectively evaluated for post-operative outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 1999 150 patients were surgically treated for brain metastases at the Department of Neurosurgery at the Technical University of Dresden. Outcome could be evaluated in 104 patients with respect to special treatment strategies and survival time (69 patients with single and 35 patients with multiple lesions). RESULTS: Most metastases originated from primary lung and breast tumours. Karnofsky performance score improved on average by 10 after surgery. The extent of the extracerebral tumour burden was the main influence on survival time. Patients' age below 70 years was combined with prolonged survival time (median survival time, MST: 4.5 months vs. 7 months). Patients with solitary cerebral metastasis had a MST of 16 months, whereas patients with singular lesions had a MST of 7 and 4 months, depending on the extent of the extracerebral tumour growth. Additional post-operative WBRT with 30 Gy was combined with an increase in MST in patients with single brain metastasis (surgery + WBRT: MST 13 months; surgery only: MST 8 months). In addition, the rate of recurrent cerebral tumour growth was distinctly higher in the non-WBRT group. Neuronavigation did not significantly improve post-operative survival time. In 80% of patients extracerebral tumour growth limited patients' survival. CONCLUSION: Surgery is an initial treatment option in patients with single and multiple brain metastases especially with large tumours (> 3 cm). Post-operative WBRT seems to prolong survival time in patients with single brain metastasis by decreasing local and distant tumour recurrence. Neuronavigational devices permit a targeted approach. Multiple processes can be extirpated in one session without prolonging the hospitalisation time for the patient. However, neuronavigational devices cannot assure complete tumour resection.     

Radiotherapeutic management of brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The management of brain metastases is a significant health care problem. An estimated 20-40% of cancer patients will develop metastatic cancer to the brain during the course of their illness. METHODS: A systematic review of randomized trials on adult cancer patients with single or multiple brain metastases from cancer of any histology was conducted. Eligible studies investigated external beam radiotherapy or radiosurgery in one of the study arms. Outcomes of interest included survival, intracranial progression-free duration, response of brain metastases to therapy, quality of life, symptom control, neurological function, and toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials were included in this systematic review of the evidence. Pooled results from three randomized trials of surgical excision combined with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) showed no improvement in overall survival as compared to WBRT alone in patients with single brain metastasis. One randomized study of postoperative WBRT following excision of a single brain metastasis versus surgery alone detected a significant reduction in intracranial tumour recurrence rates but no corresponding difference in overall survival. Nine trials of altered dose-fractionation schedules compared to a standard control fractionation schedule (3000 cGy in 10 fractions) of WBRT showed no difference in probability of survival at 6 months. The addition of radiosensitizers, as assessed in five trials, did not confer additional benefit to WBRT in terms of overall survival or the frequency of brain metastases response. Three trials examined the use of WBRT and radiosurgery boost versus WBRT alone in selected patients with brain metastases. Overall survival did not improve for patients with multiple brain metastases. However, one trial reported an improvement in survival for patients with single brain metastasis treated with WBRT and radiosurgery boost. One older randomized trial examined the use of WBRT versus supportive care alone (using oral prednisone). Results were not conclusive. CONCLUSION: For patients with a single brain metastasis, good performance status, and minimal or no evidence of extracranial disease, surgical excision and postoperative WBRT improves survival (as compared to WBRT alone). There may be a small survival advantage associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT as compared to WBRT alone in selected patients with a single brain metastasis. There is no difference in overall survival or in neurologic function improvement with the use of altered whole brain dose-fractionation schedules as compared to standard fractionation schedules (3000 cGy in 10 fractions or 2000 cGy in 5 fractions). There is no survival benefit associated with the use of radiosurgery boost and WBRT versus WBRT alone in patients with multiple brain metastases. Currently, neither chemotherapy nor radiosensitizers show a clear benefit in the objective parameters of survival and progression-free survival. For patients with poor performance status and active extracranial disease, steroids and supportive care are an option.     

A multi-institutional review of radiosurgery alone vs. radiosurgery with whole brain radiotherapy as the initial management of brain metastases

PURPOSE: Data collected from 10 institutions were reviewed to compare survival probabilities of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases managed initially with radiosurgery (RS) alone vs. RS + whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A database was created from raw data submitted from 10 institutions on patients treated with RS for brain metastases. The major exclusion criteria were resection of a brain metastasis and interval from the end of WBRT until RS >1 month (to try to ensure that the up-front intent was to combine RS + WBRT and that RS was not given for recurrent brain metastases). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method from the date of first treatment for brain metastases until death or last follow-up. Survival times were compared for patients managed initially with RS alone vs. RS + WBRT using the Cox proportional hazards model to adjust for known prognostic factors or Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class. RESULTS: Out of 983 patients, 31 were excluded because treatment began after 6/1/98; 159 were excluded because brain metastases were resected; 179 were excluded because there was an interval >1 month from WBRT until RS; and 45 were excluded for other reasons. Of the 569 evaluable patients, 268 had RS alone initially (24% of whom ultimately had salvage WBRT), and 301 had RS + up-front WBRT. The median survival times for patients treated with RS alone initially vs. RS + WBRT were 14.0 vs. 15.2 months for RPA Class 1 patients, 8.2 vs. 7.0 months for Class 2, and 5.3 vs. 5.5 months for Class 3, respectively. With adjustment by RPA class, there was no survival difference comparing RS alone initially to RS + up-front WBRT (p = 0.33, hazard ratio = 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Omission of up-front WBRT does not seem to compromise length of survival in patients treated with RS for newly diagnosed brain metastases.     

Treatment of brain metastases: review of phase III randomized controlled trials

The optimal management of brain metastases remains controversial. Both whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and local treatment [surgery (S) or radiosurgery (RS)] are the cornerstones of treatment. The role of systemic therapy is also being explored. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have tried to assess the individual and combined effects of different therapeutic strategies. (1) RCT in oligometastatic patients: WBRT alone vs. local treatment+WBRT. Combined treatment may improve both overall survival and local control in patients with a single metastasis, but it also leads to a local control benefit in patients with two to four lesions. Exclusive local treatment vs. WBRT plus local treatment. The addition of WBRT to local treatment may result in improved local control, improved freedom from new brain metastases and improved overall brain control. S+WBRT vs. RS+WBRT. There is no evidence of superiority of a combined treatment over the other one. (2) RCT addressing the point of improving WBRT outcome: differences in WBRT fractionation do not significantly alter outcome of treatments. Only a few systemic drugs may cause some significant advantages. (3) RCT that assessed neurocognitive impairment and quality of life: the baseline cognitive performance of most patients is significantly impaired. Intracranial tumor control is an essential factor in stabilizing neurocognitive function. The data on neurocognitive toxicity related to WBRT are still contradictory. Impairment of both neurocognitive function and quality of life of patients with brain metastases needs to be further addressed in RCT.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Multiple brain metastases are a common health problem, frequently diagnosed in patients with cancer. The prognosis, even after treatment with whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), is poor with average expected survivals less than 6 months. Retrospective series of stereotactic radiosurgery have shown local control and survival benefits in case series of patients with solitary brain metastases. We hypothesized that radiosurgery plus WBRT would provide improved local brain tumor control over WBRT alone in patients with two to four brain metastases. METHODS: Patients with two to four brain metastases (all < or =25 mm diameter and known primary tumor type) were randomized to initial brain tumor management with WBRT alone (30 Gy in 12 fractions) or WBRT plus radiosurgery. Extent of extracranial cancer, tumor diameters on MRI scan, and functional status were recorded before and after initial care. RESULTS: The study was stopped at an interim evaluation at 60% accrual. Twenty-seven patients were randomized (14 to WBRT alone and 13 to WBRT plus radiosurgery). The groups were well matched to age, sex, tumor type, number of tumors, and extent of extracranial disease. The rate of local failure at 1 year was 100% after WBRT alone but only 8% in patients who had boost radiosurgery. The median time to local failure was 6 months after WBRT alone (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-8.5) in comparison to 36 months (95% CI, 15.6-57) after WBRT plus radiosurgery (p = 0.0005). The median time to any brain failure was improved in the radiosurgery group (p = 0.002). Tumor control did not depend on histology (p = 0.85), number of initial brain metastases (p = 0.25), or extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.26). Patients who received WBRT alone lived a median of 7.5 months, while those who received WBRT plus radiosurgery lived 11 months (p = 0.22). Survival did not depend on histology or number of tumors, but was related to extent of extracranial disease (p = 0.02). There was no neurologic or systemic morbidity related to stereotactic radiosurgery. CONCLUSIONS: Combined WBRT and radiosurgery for patients with two to four brain metastases significantly improves control of brain disease. WBRT alone does not provide lasting and effective care for most patients.     

Two radiation regimens and prognostic factors for brain metastases in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases usually receive whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Most of these patients survive for only a few months. A short course of WBRT would be preferable to longer regimens if it could provide similar survival. This retrospective study of NSCLC patients compared longer treatment programs with short-course WBRT with 5 x 4 Gy given during 5 days. METHODS: Data from 404 NSCLC patients treated with WBRT for brain metastases were retrospectively analyzed. The 140 patients who received 5 x 4 Gy given in 5 days were compared for survival with 264 patients who received either 10 x 3 Gy given in 2 weeks or 20 x 2 Gy given in 4 weeks. Seven further potential prognostic factors were investigated for survival including age, sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT, and RPA (recursive partitioning analysis) class. RESULTS: The WBRT regimen was not associated with survival (P = .55). On multivariate analysis, age < 60 years (vs > or =60 years, P = .020), KPS > or =70 (vs KPS < 70, P < .001), interval from tumor diagnosis to WBRT > 12 months (vs < or =12 months, P = .007), no extracranial metastases (P < .001), and RPA class 1 (vs RPA class 2 vs RPA class 3, P = .007) were significantly associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Short-course WBRT with 5 x 4 Gy appeared preferable for most NSCLC patients, as it was associated with survival similar to longer WBRT programs, and the short course was less time consuming.     

Radiotherapeutic and surgical management for newly diagnosed brain metastasis(es): An American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline

PurposeTo systematically review the evidence for the radiotherapeutic and surgical management of patients newly diagnosed with intraparenchymal brain metastases.Methods and MaterialsKey clinical questions to be addressed in this evidence-based Guideline were identified. Fully published randomized controlled trials dealing with the management of newly diagnosed intraparenchymal brain metastases were searched systematically and reviewed. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force levels of evidence were used to classify various options of management.ResultsThe choice of management in patients with newly diagnosed single or multiple brain metastases depends on estimated prognosis and the aims of treatment (survival, local treated lesion control, distant brain control, neurocognitive preservation).Single brain metastasis and good prognosis (expected survival 3 months or more): For a single brain metastasis larger than 3 to 4 cm and amenable to safe complete resection, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and surgery (level 1) should be considered. Another alternative is surgery and radiosurgery/radiation boost to the resection cavity (level 3). For single metastasis less than 3 to 4 cm, radiosurgery alone or WBRT and radiosurgery or WBRT and surgery (all based on level 1 evidence) should be considered. Another alternative is surgery and radiosurgery or radiation boost to the resection cavity (level 3). For single brain metastasis (less than 3 to 4 cm) that is not resectable or incompletely resected, WBRT and radiosurgery, or radiosurgery alone should be considered (level 1). For nonresectable single brain metastasis (larger than 3 to 4 cm), WBRT should be considered (level 3).Multiple brain metastases and good prognosis (expected survival 3 months or more): For selected patients with multiple brain metastases (all less than 3 to 4 cm), radiosurgery alone, WBRT and radiosurgery, or WBRT alone should be considered, based on level 1 evidence. Safe resection of a brain metastasis or metastases causing significant mass effect and postoperative WBRT may also be considered (level 3).Patients with poor prognosis (expected survival less than 3 months): Patients with either single or multiple brain metastases with poor prognosis should be considered for palliative care with or without WBRT (level 3).It should be recognized, however, that there are limitations in the ability of physicians to accurately predict patient survival. Prognostic systems such as recursive partitioning analysis, and diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment may be helpful.ConclusionsRadiotherapeutic intervention (WBRT or radiosurgery) is associated with improved brain control. In selected patients with single brain metastasis, radiosurgery or surgery has been found to improve survival and locally treated metastasis control (compared with WBRT alone).     

Dose-response relationships for radiotherapy of brain metastases: role of intermediate-dose stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole-brain radiotherapy

The effects of intermediate-dose radiotherapy consisting of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT, 10 fractions of 3 Gy) plus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) were studied prospectively. Twenty-five adult patients with 31 brain metastases received WBRT plus linear accelerator (LINAC)-based single dose SRS with fixed treatment parameters (10 Gy at the isocenter, target volume enclosed by the 90% isodose). Median age was 63 years, median Karnofsky performance status 80%, and median diameter of brain metastases 2.4 cm. Fifteen patients had non-small-cell lung cancer. Because of some early deaths, only 26 lesions could be evaluated for response. We observed 1 complete and 15 partial remissions. Median time to progression inside or outside the SRS volume was 4.5 months. Actuarial local control of SRS-treated lesions was 61% at 1 year. At that time, only 37% of patients were free from new lesions outside the SRS volume. Median survival and cause-specific survival were 2.3 and 4.5 months, respectively (1-year survival rate 8% and 21%). Ten patients died of progressive brain metastases, 13 from extracranial disease progression (unknown cause of death in 2 cases). Comparable to SRS studies with higher doses, the majority of brain failures occurred outside the SRS volume and more patients died of extracranial progression than of uncontrolled brain metastases. Failure to improve survival can be explained by the high percentage of patients with extracranial metastases (52%). However, the present results appear less favorable than those of previous studies of SRS with 15 Gy to 16 Gy (1-year actuarial local control rates of 66-89%). Therefore, we recommend SRS with 15 Gy to 16 Gy for patients whose favorable prognostic factors justify a boost after WBRT.     

非小细胞肺癌脑转移厄洛替尼结合全脑放疗治疗的理论基础和研究进展

非小细胞肺癌（NSCLC）脑转移患者预后极差,全脑放疗（WBRT）不能同时控制颅外病灶。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂（TKI）对肺腺癌脑转移瘤患者的研究结果是令人鼓舞的,表皮生长因子受体（EGFR）突变状态与疗效相关。厄洛替尼配合全脑放疗治疗肺癌脑转移患者增敏的理论基础存在。目前,小型临床试验资料显示厄洛替尼联合全脑放疗较单纯厄洛替尼疗效更佳,且不良反应可耐受。     

BRAIN METASTASES FROM CARCINOMA OF UTERINE CERVIX

Metastatic spread of cervical carcinoma occurs by local extension and lymphatic dissemination, yet distant metastases do occur in advanced stage. The common sites of distant metastases include liver, lung, and bone. However, brain metastases are uncommon. We had 11 patients with brain metastases from cervical carcinoma in recent decade and retrospectively reviewed these cases to study the mechanisms, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 1990 and…     

The treatment of brain metastases from malignant melanoma

Metastasis to the CNS develops in nearly half of patients with advanced melanoma; in 15% to 20% of these patients, the CNS is the first site of relapse. While systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma produces objective responses in 15% to 50% of patients, the available drugs do not penetrate well into the CNS, and these patients rarely benefit from systemic therapy. Although brain metastasis may be treated with surgery and/or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) when disease is limited to approximately one to three lesions, treatment for patients with large or multiple metastases is limited to whole brain irradiation (WBRT). While formal response and survival analyses of the impact of WBRT in melanoma have not been reported, the estimated median survival time for unselected patients with CNS metastases is only 2 to 4 months, with 1-year survival rates of less than 13%. In a selected population of patients with limited CNS involvement, surgical resection alone or in combination with WBRT appears to prolong median survival. More recently, SRS has been shown to be an effective local treatment for selected patients with brain metastases. In several retrospective reports of patients with melanoma CNS metastases, treatment with surgical resection alone or in combination with WBRT has been demonstrated to prolong median survival. More recently, SRS has been shown to be an effective local treatment for selected patients with brain metastases. In several retrospective reports, patients with CNS metastases from melanoma treated with a combination of WBRT plus SRS or SRS alone had median survivals and rates of control in the CNS superior to published reports for traditional WBRT. Most of these patients died from progressive extracranial disease with locally controlled CNS disease. Investigation of the contribution of newer systemic agents to the control of melanoma metastatic to the CNS has been based on the identification of drugs that have antitumor activity and the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Fotemustine is a nitrosourea that produced similar activity in CNS metastasis as in systemic disease, with a response rate of about 25%. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent that acts via the same mechanism as dacarbazine (DTIC), the most active single agent in melanoma. TMZ, which is highly active in brain tumors, has also been associated with activity in systemic and CNS metastases in melanoma patients, also in the 25% range. Efforts are underway to assess the additive benefit of TMZ and other drugs to WBRT or focused radiotherapy in this disease.