Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: quantifying the effects of interventions and rapid diagnostic testing

Control of nosocomial transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been unsuccessful in most countries. Yet, some countries have maintained low endemic levels by implementing nationwide MRSA-specific infection control measures, such as "search & destroy" (S&D). These strategies, however, are not based on well designed studies, and their use in countries with high levels of endemicity is controversial. We present a stochastic three-hospital model and an analytical one-hospital model to quantify the effectiveness of different infection control measures and to predict the effects of rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) on isolation needs. Isolation of MRSA carriers identified by clinical cultures is insufficient to control MRSA. However, combined with proactive search (of high-risk patients on admission and/or contacts of index patients), it will maintain prevalence levels <1%. Concerted implementation of S&D in countries with high nosocomial endemicity reduces nosocomial prevalence to <1% within 6 years. Stepwise implementation of control measures can reduce isolation capacities needed. RDT can reduce isolation needs by >90% in low-endemic settings and by 20% in high-endemic settings. Surveillance of colonization and improved hand hygiene can markedly increase control efficacy. These findings strongly suggest that: (i) causality exists between S&D and low MRSA prevalence; (ii) isolating MRSA carriers identified by clinical cultures as a single measure is insufficient for control; (iii) a combined approach of isolation and screening confers efficacy; and (iv) MRSA-prevalence levels can be reduced to <1% in high-endemic settings by S&D or a stepwise approach to interventions. RDT can markedly enhance feasibility.     

Emergence and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a children's hospital and pediatric long-term care facility.

BACKGROUND: After a 6-year quiescence, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from 30 patients in a children's hospital and a pediatric long-term care facility from November 1987 through April 1989. After six nosocomial cases had occurred at the children's hospital, increased infection control measures directed at MRSA were initiated in August 1988. Because MRSA had been identified in three patients in the pediatric long-term care facility within 24 hours of their admission to the children's hospital, other patients transferred from the pediatric long-term care facility to the children's hospital were isolated and screened for MRSA. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of these patients and evaluated their response to therapy with rifampin alone or in combination with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. RESULTS: In the 8-month period after initiation of infection control measures, MRSA was identified in 10 residents of the pediatric long-term care facility; there was also one nosocomial children's hospital case. Phage typing showed that one MRSA strain predominated in patients at the pediatric long-term care facility but did not implicate this strain as the source for MRSA introduction into the children's hospital. Of 16 patients with MRSA who completed therapy and were available for follow-up, 13 (81%) had elimination of colonization. CONCLUSION: Prompt institution of MRSA surveillance, barrier isolation, and therapy to eliminate colonization should be considered in hospitals with a new introduction of MRSA.     

Assessing the role of undetected colonization and isolation precautions in reducing Methicillin-Resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Staphylococcus aureus</Emphasis>transmission in intensive care units

Background  

Screening and isolation are central components of hospital methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) control policies. Their prevention of patient-to-patient spread depends on minimizing undetected and unisolated MRSA-positive patient days. Estimating these MRSA-positive patient days and the reduction in transmission due to isolation presents a major methodological challenge, but is essential for assessing both the value of existing control policies and the potential benefit of new rapid MRSA detection technologies. Recent methodological developments have made it possible to estimate these quantities using routine surveillance data.     

Eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a health center ward and associated nursing home

BACKGROUND: Long-term health care facilities have been recognized as reservoirs of multiresistant bacterial strains, especially methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Efforts to control MRSA in this setting usually have been only partially effective. We describe herein the eradication of epidemic MRSA from a Finnish health care center ward and affiliated nursing home. METHODS: The methods to control MRSA included (1) contact isolation precautions, (2) screening for asymptomatic carriage, (3) eradication of carriage, and (4) education of staff on hygienic measures. The first 6 patients with MRSA-positive findings were referred without delay to the Infectious Diseases Unit of the adjacent university hospital for eradication treatment. Later, an isolation unit of 6 rooms was founded in the health care center, where the MRSA-colonized patients were nursed as a separate cohort until they, in succession, were referred to the Infectious Diseases Unit for decolonization. RESULTS: From May 20 through August 17, 1993, the epidemic MRSA strain was isolated from 8 long-term patients on the 40-bed ward of the health care center, 4 of the 59 residents of the nursing home, and 1 member of the staff. Eradication of carriage was successful in all except 1 patient with dementia, who was nursed in contact isolation in the health care center until his death 21 months later. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to eradicate MRSA from a long-term health care facility even after 13 cases by applying strict control measures. Our experience may be valuable in the future decision-making process for control of new and more challenging multiresistant bacteria, eg, vancomycin-resistant strains of MRSA.     

Overcrowding and understaffing in modern health-care systems: key determinants in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission

Recent decades have seen the global emergence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), causing substantial health and economic burdens on patients and health-care systems. This epidemic has occurred at the same time that policies promoting higher patient throughput in hospitals have led to many services operating at, or near, full capacity. A result has been limited ability to scale services according to fluctuations in patient admissions and available staff, and hospital overcrowding and understaffing. Overcrowding and understaffing lead to failure of MRSA control programmes via decreased health-care worker hand-hygiene compliance, increased movement of patients and staff between hospital wards, decreased levels of cohorting, and overburdening of screening and isolation facilities. In turn, a high MRSA incidence leads to increased inpatient length of stay and bed blocking, exacerbating overcrowding and leading to a vicious cycle characterised by further infection control failure. Future decision making should use epidemiological and economic evidence to evaluate the effect of systems changes on the incidence of MRSA infection and other adverse events.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: factors responsible for its incidence

INTRODUCTION: How can we explain that the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) varies between the European countries, ranging from < 1% in Scandinavia to > 30% in Spain, France and Italy? This paper is aimed at attempting to determine factors at the origin of the spreading of endemic MRSA strains as of the early 1980s. Those strains are characterized by their ability to develop resistance to current antibiotics and make treatment of severe and deep infections more complex. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Differences in the virulence of MRSA strains and that of susceptible strains appear unlikely. MRSA prevalence seems to be a growing problem, especially in Southern Europe where rates of resistance to other anti-staphylococcal antibiotics are high. General policies for antibiotic therapy as well as the implementation of strategies for prevention and control of MRSA might be responsible for such rates. Indeed, once MRSA is introduced into a facility without control program, this multiresistant bacteria rapidly spreads within the hospital and becomes endemic, expanding its reservoir. FUTURE PROSPECTS ET PROJECTS: Due to the introduction of new methods in microbiology and communication, infection control measures including procedures for isolation and identification of MRSA reservoirs are still feasible; however, their implementation requires human and material resources. Areas requiring improvement in the detection of MRSA outbreaks are identified in this paper, with particular emphasis on the need for national surveillance of MRSA prevalence and reappraisal of MRSA control strategies in French hospitals.     

A multistrain cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus based in a native community

Since 1986 the authors' hospital has experienced increased numbers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates linked to residents of a native Indian community infected or colonized on admission. A survey of 422 consecutive persons from that community admitted to hospital over a three year period identified 21 (4.9%) carrying MRSA. In a case control study of 34 carriers compared to noncarriers from the community, only prior hospitalization within the past 12 months was identified as being significantly associated with the carrier state, but a specific hospital associated with this risk was not identified. A study of subsets of MRSA isolates in these patients revealed multiple strains present, identified by antibiograms, phage typing profiles and plasmid analysis. Community-based clusters of MRSA have only rarely been previously identified.     

Two-stage evaluation and intervention program for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the hospital setting

The aim of this study was to develop a 2-stage evaluation and intervention program for control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the hospital setting. The first stage included evaluation of MRSA prevalence throughout the entire hospital; the presence of MRSA was determined in patients or medical staff who had a high risk of carrying it (i.e. as a result of contact with surgical wounds). In the second stage, "contact isolation" (which included the use of gloves, hand washing before and after treatment of a patient and isolation of patients' personal belongings) was carried out in every patient from whom MRSA was isolated in 4 intervention departments-Surgery, Orthopaedics, General ICU and Neonatal ICU-while the same policy of attempting to isolate MRSA was maintained. Both stages lasted 7 months. A comparison between MRSA prevalence in the evaluation and intervention stages disclosed a decrease in MRSA isolates from 91 to 56 in the entire hospital (p = 0.2) and from 45 to 24 in the intervention departments (p = 0.05), respectively; while the number of patients with MRSA decreased from 87 to 55 in the entire hospital (p = 0.2) and from 45 to 18 in the intervention departments (p = 0.007). The number of patients treated with vancomycin decreased from 48 before intervention to 23 after "contact isolation" was started in the entire hospital (p = 0.02) and from 31 to 5 in the intervention departments (p = 0.001). These results provide additional evidence in favor of establishing a program to control MRSA spread.     

Methicillin/Oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a hospital and public health threat in Brazil

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is an established nosocomial pathogen (HA-MRSA, hospital acquired MRSA), but has recently begun to appear in the community (CA-MRSA, community acquired MRSA). The cause of resistance to methicillin and all other β-lactam antibiotics is the mecA gene, which is situated on a mobile genetic element, the Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec). Seven major variants of SCCmec, type I to VII are distinguished. HA-MRSA disseminated worldwide and causes the majority of S. aureus nosocomial infections with a limited number of clones disseminated including the Brazilian Epidemic Clone (BEC, ST239-MRSA-III). CA-MRSA isolates are susceptible to non-β-lactam antibiotics, usually isolated from healthy individuals which do not possess any unknown risk factors for MRSA infection and are associated with a larger clonal diversity compared with HA-MRSA. However, during recent years distinction between HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA is beginning to fade. Actually, knowledge about MRSA disseminating clones is required to implement any strategies to control the transmission of MRSA either within hospitals or in community. For this reason, rapid identification of strains is an important issue. The rate of HAMRSA can be reduced substantially through the implementation of interventions strategies, even in settings where MRSA is endemic as in most Brazilian hospitals. However, these policies could be quite complicated in the light of an increasing CA-MRSA prevalence in healthcare facilities, considering that distinction between HA-MRSA and CA-MRSA has started to disappear.     

Community-based cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Manitoba

A community-based, single strain cluster of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is described. The cluster of cases was identified in a small rural community in southwestern Manitoba, although some spread of the MRSA strain to neighbouring communities was observed. The majority of people were otherwise healthy, had no contact with the hospital system and did not fit the profile of those at risk for MRSA infection.Key Words: Community cluster, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSAMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is recognized worldwide as a major nosocomial pathogen in hospitals. Guidelines have been established to provide a framework for the management of patients with MRSA in health care facilities. However, the epidemiology and control of MRSA in the community is not clear. We recently investigated a single strain community outbreak of MRSA in a small rural community. This report describes the community spread of this strain among otherwise healthy individuals with no clear predisposing risk factors.     

Infection control and antimicrobial restriction practices for antimicrobial-resistant organisms in Canadian tertiary care hospitals

In 2003, a survey examining infection control and antimicrobial restriction policies and practices for preventing the emergence and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), and extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) was performed within Canadian teaching hospitals as part of the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program. Twenty-eight of 29 questionnaires were returned. The majority of facilities conducted admission screening for MRSA (96.4%) and VRE (89.3%) but only 1 site screened for ESBL/AmpC. Rates of MRSA, VRE, and ESBL remain low in Canada. It is believed that these lower rates may be due to intense admission screening protocols and stringent infection control policies for antimicrobial-resistant organisms (AROs) within Canadian institutions. Few (MRSA: 14.8%; VRE: 12.0%) recorded the number of patients screened. Regular prevalence surveys were done for MRSA (21.4%), VRE (35.7%), and ESBL/AmpC (3.8%). Pre-emptive precautions were applied for MRSA by 60.7% and for VRE by 75.0% of facilities. All facilities flagged patients previously identified with MRSA and VRE but only 46.2% flagged ESBL and 15.4% flagged AmpC patients. Barrier precautions varied by ARO and patient-care setting. In the inpatient non-ICU setting, more than 90% wore gowns and gloves for MRSA and VRE but only 50% for ESBL; and 57.1% wore masks for MRSA. Attempts to decolonize MRSA patients had been made by 82.1%, largely in order to place them in another facility. Policies restricting antimicrobial prescribing were reported by 21 facilities (75.0%). Further studies examining hospital infection control policies and corresponding rates of ARO infections would help in identifying and refining best practice guidelines within Canadian institutions.     

Methicillin resistance among Trinidadian isolates of community and hospital strains of Staphylococcus aureus and their patterns of resistance to non-beta-lactam antibiotics

The prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains in Trinidad and the extent of their resistance to other antimicrobial agents in hospital-acquired and community-acquired infections were evaluated over a 2-year period. A total of 450 S. aureus strains were isolated from different patients. The prevalence of methicillin resistance among S. aureus strains was 9.8% (44/450). The proportion of MRSA isolated from hospital sources and community sources was 12.5% (38/305) and 4.1% (6/145), respectively (P < 0.05). The resistant rates of MRSA to the non-beta-lactam antibiotics were as follows: 93.2% resistance to tetracycline, 68.2% to erythromycin, 61.4% to gentamicin, 45.5% to co-trimoxazole, and 20.5% to ciprofloxacin. No MRSA resistant to vancomycin was observed in this study. Study results showed significant increases in MRSA in hospital, 2% in 1995 to 12.5% in 1998 (P < 0.05), and community, 0% in 1995 to 4.1% in 1998 (P < 0.05). It has become apparent that infection control and surveillance initiatives must be focused now on the community in order to monitor and limit the spread of this new and expanding reservoir of MRSA.     

社区相关性甲氧西林耐药金黄色葡萄球菌:一个值得关注的病原体

社区相关性MRSA近年来逐渐为人们所重视,作为引起医院外感染的重要病原体之一,近年的研究表明其发病率呈不断上升的趋势,与传统的导致院内感染的MRSA相比,社区相关性MRSA有其独特的流行病学特点、发病机制和耐药机制。制定合理的治疗和预防措施显得格外重要。     

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a community strain

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become particularly well known in association with hospital acquired infections but is also known to have infected people in the community. We define cases of community acquired MRSA infection as the     

Staphylococcal resistance revisited: community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus--an emerging problem for the management of skin and soft tissue infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In the community non-localized or deep staphylococcal skin and soft tissue infections are typically managed with beta-lactamase stable penicillins. The aims of this review are (1) to evaluate the evidence for the emergence of new strains of community-acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), (2) to identify the reasons for their significant association with cutaneous infections, and (3) to consider how they arose and how big a threat they pose to the management of such infections outside hospitals. RECENT FINDINGS: MRSA are emerging as significant community pathogens, especially in previously healthy children with no recognizable risk factors, and are predominantly associated with skin and soft tissue infections (especially abscesses and cellulitis). When present, risk factors are generally similar to those for infection with methicillin susceptible S. aureus. The MRSA isolates associated with such infections may not be entirely 'new', but could represent the displacement of some hospital clones (e.g. EMRSA-15 or variants thereof) to the community as well as the de-novo generation of novel MRSA clones by multiple horizontal transmissions of the mecA gene into methicillin susceptible S. aureus with different genetic backgrounds, some of which are already circulating globally. Community-acquired MRSA from diverse locations are non multiresistant and almost always contain the novel type IV SCCmec commonly found in coagulase-negative staphylococci, but also in hospital-associated gentamicin susceptible MRSA from France, the paediatric clone and in EMRSA-15. SUMMARY: More local data on CA-MRSA infections are needed so that dermatologists and community physicians can assess the risk of such infections amongst their patients and avoid the inappropriate administration of beta-lactams. No simple change in prescribing practices will entirely alleviate selective pressure for the spread of community-acquired MRSA and not exacerbate resistance in pyogenic streptococci, commonly found together with S. aureus in skin and soft tissue infections. The importance of hygiene in preventing the spread of community-acquired MRSA in the community must be reemphasized.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter baumannii: An unexpected difference in epidemiologic behavior

Background: The Dutch guideline on hospital policy for the prevention of nosocomial spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) states that patients transferred from hospitals abroad must be placed in strict isolation immediately on admission to a hospital in the Netherlands. Three patients colonized with both MRSA and a multiresistant Acinetobacter were transferred from hospitals in Mediterranean countries to 3 different hospitals in the Netherlands. Despite isolation precautions, Acinetobacter spread in 2 of the 3 hospitals, whereas nosocomial spread of MRSA did not occur. Methods: For outbreak analysis, the Acinetobacter isolates, identified as Acinetobacter baumannii by the use of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis, were comparatively typed by 4 methods. Comparison of isolation measures in the hospitals was performed retrospectively. Results: In the 2 hospitals in which nosocomial spread of Acinetobacter occurred, most of the epidemiologically related isolates were indistinguishable from the index strains. In these 2 hospitals, isolation measures were in concordance with those recommended for the prevention of contact transmission. The precautions of the hospital in which no outbreak occurred included the prevention of airborne transmission. Conclusions: Precautions recommended for multiresistant gram-negative organisms are insufficient for the prevention of nosocomial spread of multiresistant Acinetobacter . The airborne mode of spread of acinetobacters should be taken into account, and guidelines should be revised accordingly. (AJIC Am J Infect Control 1998;26:544-51)     

Community-acquired methicillin-resistant <Emphasis Type="Italic">Staphylococcus aureus</Emphasis>: Epidemiology and potential virulence factors

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been isolated from patients in the community. Some of these strains may have origins in the hospital, but others appear to be novel and unrelated to known hospital strains. Community MRSA strains have several distinguishing characteristics that may enable them to more readily colonize and infect otherwise healthy individuals. This article reviews recent publications addressing the epidemiology of MRSA in the community, risk factors associated with carriage, potentially associated virulence factors, and concepts of strain fitness as they pertain to MRSA. MRSA likely will be an increasingly important pathogen in the community.     

Significant pathogens isolated from surgical site infections at a community hospital in the Midwest

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the incidence of microorganisms isolated from surgical site infections (SSIs) have been conducted primarily at large academic health care centers. Results from these studies have revealed that methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a significant pathogen in SSIs. Minimal data are available from smaller, community hospitals on the incidence of microorganisms associated with SSIs, particularly the incidence of MRSA in SSIs. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to identify the microorganisms associated with SSIs in patients who underwent class I and II surgeries at a small urban to rural community hospital from January 2003 through December 2004. RESULTS: A total of 10,672 surgeries was performed, and 89 SSIs were identified. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (25.8%). Enterobacteriaceae were the second most frequently isolated organisms (12.4%), followed by streptococci species (11.2%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (10.1%), enterococci species (7.9%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6.7%). MRSA was isolated from 4.5% of the SSIs. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that the spectrum of microorganisms isolated in SSIs at a community hospital is comparable with that reported in studies conducted at large academic health care centers, including the emergence of MRSA as a pathogen in SSIs. This information will guide future infection control initiatives to reduce SSIs.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A public health issue with economic consequences

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become endemic worldwide in hospitals, and community-associated MRSA is spreading into the community at large. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the current cost of MRSA in Canada and to assess the magnitude of this public health issue. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature was conducted to gather epidemiology, health care resource utilization and cost data for MRSA in Canadian settings. The current MRSA burden was estimated using available cost data and the most recent epidemiology data. RESULTS: The rate of MRSA in Canadian hospitals increased from 0.46 to 5.90 per 1000 admissions between 1995 and 2004, while community-associated MRSA continued to spread into the community. Patients harbouring MRSA required prolonged hospitalization (average 26 days of isolation per patient), special control measures, expensive treatments and extensive surveillance. Total cost per infected MRSA patient averaged $12,216, with hospitalization being the major cost driver (81%), followed by barrier precautions (13%), antimicrobial therapy (4%) and laboratory investigations (2%). The most recent epidemiological data, combined with available cost data, suggest that direct health care cost attributable to MRSA in Canada, including cost for management of MRSA-infected and-colonized patients and MRSA infrastructure, averaged $82 million in 2004 and could reach $129 million in 2010. CONCLUSION: MRSA is a costly public health issue that needs to be tackled if the growing burden of this disease in Canadian hospitals and in the community is to be limited.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Europe: which infection control measures are taken?

Background

The prevalence of hospital-acquired Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections shows a huge variety across Europe. Some countries reported a reduction in MRSA frequency, while in others countries increasing MRSA rates have been observed. To reduce the spread of MRSA in the healthcare setting, a sufficient MRSA management is essential. In order to reflect the MRSA management across Europe, MRSA prevention policies were surveyed in ten countries.

Materials and methods

The survey was performed by questionnaires in European intensive care units (ICUs) and surgical departments (SDs) in 2004. Questionnaires asked for availability of bedside alcohol hand-disinfection, isolation precautions, decolonization and screening methods. The study was embedded in the Hospital in Europe Link for Infection Control through Surveillance (HELICS) Project, a European collaboration of national surveillance networks. HELICS was initiated in order to harmonize the national surveillance activities in the individual countries. Therefore, HELICS participants developed surveillance modules for nosocomial infections in ICUs and for surgical site infections (SSI). The coordination of this surveillance has now been transferred to the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

Results

A total of 526 ICUs and 223 SDs from ten countries sent data on organisational characteristics and policies, demonstrating wide variations in care. Substantial variation existed in availability of bedside alcohol hand-disinfection, which was much higher in participating ICUs rather than in SDs (86 vs. 59%). Surveillance cultures of contact patients were obtained in approximately three-fourths of all SDs (72%) and ICUs (75%). Countries with decreasing MRSA proportions showed especially strict implementation of various prevention measures.

Conclusion

The data obtained regarding MRSA prevention measures should stimulate infection control professionals to pursue further initiatives. Particularly, the vigorous MRSA management in countries with decreasing MRSA proportions should encourage hospitals to implement preventive measures in order to reduce the spread of MRSA.