Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus and low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients

Both tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are potent immunosuppressive agents used in combination for prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation. We studied the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus/MMF-based primary immunosuppression as well as their pharmacokinetics (PK) in Chinese renal transplant recipients. Oral tacrolimus was initiated at about 0.2 mg/kg/d, dose which was adjusted to achieve target trough levels of 10 to 20 ng/mL at 3 months and 5 to 10 ng/mL thereafter. The patients also received MMF (0.5 g bid) and prednisolone. PK profiles were studied at 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplant. Blood samples were taken at 0 (predose), 20, 40, 60, 75, and 90 minutes and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours postdose for each profile. Plasma MPA and whole blood tacrolimus levels were determined by HPLC and EMIT methods respectively. Eight patients were studied with mean follow-up of 16.1 +/- 2.4 months. One patient (12.5%) experienced a borderline acute rejection episode. Both 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 100%. Posttransplant diabetes, diarrhea, and hand tremor occurred in 12.5%, 12.5%, and 37.5%, respectively. No patient had an opportunistic infection. Tacrolimus trough concentrations showed a fair correlation with AUC(0-12h) (R(2) = 0.587). Mean MPA AUC values at 1, 3, and 6 months were 40.5 +/- 9.4, 44.4 +/- 17.3, and 57.2 +/- 20.7 mug*h/mL, respectively (P = .0486, n = 7). In conclusion, primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus, low-dose MMF (0.5 g bid), and prednisolone is effective and safe with adequate systemic MPA exposure in renal transplant recipients.     

Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and early steroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients: a multicenter, prospective, pilot trial

This single-arm, open-label, pilot study was designed to assess the efficacy and cardiovascular safety profile of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal interleukin (IL)-2Ralpha antibody, in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and early corticosteroid withdrawal in renal transplant recipients. Seventy-nine renal allograft recipients were treated with daclizumab (1 mg/kg; five doses starting on the day before transplant and then every two weeks), MMF (1 g b.i.d.), tacrolimus (0.2 mg/kg/d), and low-dose prednisolone, which was withdrawn at day 150 after transplant. The rate of acute rejection was determined at 12 months. Lipid profile, oral glucose tolerance, and adverse events were monitored. Of the 76 patients eligible for analysis, eight (10.5%) developed biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR). Ten (13.2%) experienced clinical and/or BPAR. Corticosteroids were withdrawn completely in 91% of patients at 12 months. Graft and patient survival were 97.5% and 98.7% respectively. Mean total cholesterol and triglycerides were significantly lower at 12 months post-transplant than at baseline (201 +/- 47.5 vs. 190.8 +/- 43.6 mg/dL, p = 0.005 and 196.2 +/- 133.2 vs. 144.5 +/- 76.8 mg/dL, p < 0.001, respectively). Mean hemoglobin A1c levels did not differ between baseline (5.54%) and 12 months (5.48%). New-onset post-transplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 6.6% of the non-diabetic transplanted patients. The proportion of patients with abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was 47% at 3 months and 39% at 12 months (p = NS). Daclizumab induction in combination with MMF, tacrolimus, and low-dose (followed by withdrawal) prednisolone appears to be effective and safe in patients receiving renal allografts. The regimen appears to be associated with a favorable cardiovascular profile.     

Two-dose daclizumab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid-free regimen in de novo cardiac transplant recipients: early experience

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (TAC) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a steroid-free regimen seems to have good efficacy in preventing acute rejection in cardiac transplant recipients, although concern exists about nephrotoxicity. Induction therapy with Daclizumab seems to give protection without side effects. Data are lacking about the outcome of 2-dose Daclizumab+TAC+MMF and a steroid-free regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 consecutive de novo heart transplantations performed at a single center between January 2001 and June 2006. Patients received induction therapy with 2-dose Daclizumab. Maintenance immunosuppression included TAC, MMF, and prednisone during the first 6 months. The endpoints were the incidence of acute rejection, patient and graft survival, and clinical tolerability. RESULTS: Among 28 patients of mean age 57 +/- 9 years, 2 subjects (7%) died in the perioperative period due to infections. The mean follow-up was 2.8 +/- 1.5 years. There were no late deaths. Six patients experienced acute rejection (International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT] >or=3A) that required treatment during the first 3 months. At follow-up, only 3 patients (>or=3A) required treatment. Mean creatinine level increased from 1.08 +/- 0.37 at baseline to 1.08 +/- 0.41 at 1 year (n = 23; P = not significant [NS]) to 1.39 +/- 0.68 (n = 13; P < .05) at 4 years, 1.65 +/- 0.51 (n = 8; P < .05) at 5 years. No patient required replacement therapy. CONCLUSIONS: A steroid-free protocol with 2-dose Daclizumab induction therapy and maintenance with TAC and MMF seemed to be safe to prevent acute rejection. Creatinine levels were slightly but significantly increased.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus/prednisone versus tacrolimus/prednisone/mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Between September 20, 1995 and September 20, 1997, 208 adult patients undergoing renal transplantation were randomized to receive tacrolimus/prednisone (n=106) or tacrolimus/prednisone/mycophenolate mofetil (n=102), with the goal of reducing the incidence of rejection. METHODS: The mean recipient age was 50.7+/-13.7 years. Sixty-three (30.3%) patients were 60 years of age or older at the time of transplantation. The mean donor age was 34.5+/-21.7 years. The mean cold ischemia time was 30.5+/-9.2 hr. The mean follow-up is 15+/-7 months. RESULTS: The overall 1-year actuarial patient survival was 94%; the overall 1-year actuarial graft survival was 87%. When the patient and graft survival data were stratified to recipients under the age of 60 who did not have delayed graft function, the overall 1-year actuarial patient survival was 97%, and the corresponding 1-year actuarial graft survival was 93%. There were no differences between the two groups. The overall incidence of rejection was 36%; in the double-therapy group, it was 44%, whereas in the triple therapy group, it was 27% (P=0.014). The mean serum creatinine was 1.6+/-0.8 mg/dl. A total of 36% of the successfully transplanted patients were taken off prednisone; 32% of the patients were taken off antihypertensive medications. The incidence of delayed graft function was 21%, the incidence of cytomegalovirus was 12.5%, and the initial and final incidences of posttransplant insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were 7.0% and 2.9%; again, there was no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial suggests that the combination of tacrolimus, steroids, and mycophenolate mofetil is associated with excellent patient and graft survival and a lower incidence of rejection than the combination of tacrolimus and steroids.     

Randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in primary renal transplant recipients given tacrolimus and daclizumab/thymoglobulin: one year follow-up

BACKGROUND: It was of interest to compare enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) among renal transplant recipients receiving a tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen. METHODS: Between December 2004 and February 2006, a single-center, open-label randomized trial of MMF (group A, n=75) versus EC-MPS (group B, n=75) was performed in primary renal transplant recipients receiving combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction along with reduced tacrolimus dosing and elimination of corticosteroids 1 week postoperatively. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of acute rejection (AR) during the first 12 months posttransplant; secondary aims were to compare graft and patient survival, renal function, drug dosing and monitoring, gastrointestinal side effects, and other adverse events at 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Patient/graft survival in groups A and B were 100%/96% versus 99%/96%, respectively (N.S.). At 12 months, a total of nine patients (6%) experienced biopsy-proven AR, 3% (2/75) vs. 9% (7/75) in the MMF and EC-MPS arms, respectively (N.S.). At 12 months, the geometric mean*/SE serum creatinine concentration and arithmetic mean+/-SE calculated glomerular filtration rate in groups A and B, respectively, were 1.30*/1.03 and 61.4+/-2.0 vs. 1.26*/1.03 and 66.0+/-2.1 (N.S.). Incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus (11% vs. 11%), infections requiring hospitalization (13% vs. 15%), and gastrointestinal side effects (36% vs. 32%) appeared equivalent (N.S.). CONCLUSIONS: Early efficacy and toxicity were equivalent between the two study arms. Optimizing either MMF or EC-MPS along with a combined thymoglobulin/daclizumab induction, low tacrolimus dosing and steroid avoidance resulted in a low AR rate and an acceptably high renal function at 12 months.     

ADHERE: randomized controlled trial comparing renal function in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving prolonged‐release tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus

ADHERE was a randomized, open‐label, Phase IV study comparing renal function at Week 52 postkidney transplant, in patients who received prolonged‐release tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimens. On Days 0–27, patients received prolonged‐release tacrolimus (initially 0.2 mg/kg/day), corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were randomized on Day 28 to receive either prolonged‐release tacrolimus plus MMF (Arm 1) or prolonged‐release tacrolimus (≥25% dose reduction on Day 42) plus sirolimus (Arm 2). The primary endpoint was glomerular filtration rate by iohexol clearance (mGFR) at Week 52. Secondary endpoints included eGFR, creatinine clearance (CrCl), efficacy failure (patient withdrawal or graft loss), and patient/graft survival. Tolerability was analyzed. The full‐analysis set comprised 569 patients (Arm 1: 287; Arm 2: 282). Week 52 mean mGFR was similar in Arm 1 versus Arm 2 (40.73 vs. 41.75 ml/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.405), as were the secondary endpoints, except composite efficacy failure, which was higher in Arm 2 versus 1 (18.2% vs. 11.5%; P = 0.002) owing to a higher postrandomization withdrawal rate due to adverse events (AEs) (14.4% vs. 5.2%). Results from this study show comparable renal function between arms at Week 52, with fewer AEs leading to study discontinuation with prolonged‐release tacrolimus plus MMF (Arm 1) versus lower dose prolonged‐release tacrolimus plus sirolimus (Arm 2).     

Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil in stable pediatric liver transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine.

There are few pharmacokinetic data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) when used in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) in pediatric liver transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of MMF in stable pediatric liver transplant patients and estimate the dose of MMF required to provide a mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure similar to that observed in adult liver transplant recipients receiving the recommended dose of MMF (target area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours [AUC(0-12)] for MPA of 29 mug.hour/mL in the immediate posttransplantation period and 58 microg x hour/mL after 6 months). A 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile was collected for 8 pediatric patients (mean age 20.9 months) on stable doses of MMF and CsA who had received a liver transplant > or = 6 months prior to entry and who had started on MMF within 2 weeks of transplantation. Mean MMF dosage was 285 mg/m(2) (range, 200-424 mg/m(2)). Of 8 patients, 7 had a MPA AUC(0-12) (range, 11.0-37.2 microg x hour/mL) well below the target. One patient had an AUC(0-12) > or = 58 microg x hour/mL but was considered an outlier and was excluded from analyses. Mean MPA AUC(0-12) and maximum plasma concentration values were 22.7 +/- 10.5 microg x hour/mL and 7.23 +/- 3.27 microg/mL, respectively; values normalized to 600 mg/m(2) (the approved pediatric dose in renal transplantation) were 47.0 +/- 21.8 microg x hour/mL and 14.5 +/- 4.21 microg/mL. In conclusion, assuming that MPA exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, when used in combination with CsA, a MMF dose of 740 mg/m(2) twice daily would be recommended in pediatric liver transplant recipients to achieve MPA exposures similar to those observed in adult liver transplant recipients. This finding should be confirmed by a prospective trial.     

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in maintenance renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus: clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic outcomes

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) pharmacokinetics using the mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) formulation are known to differ between patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine, but only limited data exist concerning concomitant use of tacrolimus and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). METHODS: In this six-month, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial, 63 maintenance renal transplant patients receiving tacrolimus were converted from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to EC-MPS. RESULTS: MPA concentration-time profiles in 21 patients showed that MPA exposure was similar with MMF or EC-MPS (mean area under the curve 39.9+/-11.6 microg x h/mL versus 43.7+/-17.4 microg x h/mL at day 14 post-conversion). Median time to peak concentration was 0.5 hr with MMF and 1.5 hr with EC-MPS. Inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) activity was almost identical: area under the enzyme activity time curve (AEC) was 124.2+/-32.0 nmol x h/mg prot/h with MMF and 130.3+/-36.6 nmol x h/mg prot/h with EC-MPS at 14 days post-conversion; average daytime IMPDH activity was 10.3+/-2.7 nmol/h/mg protein and 10.9+/-2.7 nmol/h/mg protein, respectively. Maximal daytime inhibition of IMPDH activity was 67% with MMF and 62% with EC-MPS at day 14. One patient (1.6%) experienced mild biopsy-proven acute rejection. No graft losses or deaths occurred. Renal function remained stable (mean calculated creatinine clearance 70.6+/-26.8 mL/min with MMF and 68.8+/-25.4 mL/min six months post-conversion). Adverse events or infections with a suspected relation to EC-MPS occurred in 12 patients (19%). Four patients discontinued EC-MPS due to adverse events or infections. CONCLUSIONS: MMF and EC-MPS are associated with similar MPA exposure and equivalent pharmacodynamic effect. Conversion of tacrolimus-treated maintenance renal transplant patients from MMF to EC-MPS is safe and well-tolerated and does not compromise therapeutic efficacy.     

A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C

Hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection post-LT remains a problem for which there is no completely satisfactory treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which has both immunosuppressive and antiviral properties, to determine whether it is associated with a difference in the rate of HCV recurrence and also examine its impact on patient and graft survival. Between August 1995 and May 1998, a total of 106 patients who were HCV positive before LT were randomized to tacrolimus (TAC) and prednisone versus TAC, prednisone, and MMF therapy. The rate of recurrence of HCV, patient and graft survival, incidences of rejection, and histological findings were examined. Fifty six patients were randomized to TAC and steroid therapy (double [D] drug; group D), and 50 patients were randomized to TAC, steroid, and MMF therapy (triple [T] drug; group T). Liver biopsies were performed when liver function was abnormal; protocol liver biopsies were not performed. Mean follow-up was 4.3 [plusmn] 0.8 years. Actuarial patient survivals at 4 years were 72.6% in group D and 73.8% in group T (P = not significant). Actuarial graft survivals at 4 years were 65.6% in group D and 65.4% in group T. One patient in group D and 2 patients in group T underwent a second LT for recurrent HCV. One patient in each group died of recurrent HCV without re-LT. Twenty-six patients in group D (46.4%) and 23 patients in group T (46.0%) showed signs of recurrent HCV. Mean hepatitis activity index (HAI) scores were 7.4 [plusmn] 2.7 in group D and 7.0 [plusmn] 3.4 in group T, and mean fibrosis scores were 2.9 [plusmn] 1.7 in group D and 2.6 [plusmn] 1.1 in group T. The rate of rejection was 0.57/patient in each group for the entire follow-up period. None of these values reached statistical significance. Rates of HCV recurrence, graft loss or death from recurrent HCV, and 4-year actuarial patient and graft survival were not different between the groups. In liver transplant recipients with HCV, MMF has no impact on patient survival, graft survival, rejection, or rate of HCV recurrence based on biochemical changes and histological findings. In addition, there was no difference in HAI or fibrosis score between the two groups. Either MMF has no anti-HCV effect or its immunosuppressive properties overwhelm its antiviral effect in the clinical setting. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:40-46.)     

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen

Abstract:  Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are effective immunosuppressive drugs with distinct safety profile.
Methods:  Kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppressive regimen were randomized to receive fixed daily doses of MMF (2 g/d, n = 50) or SRL (one loading dose of 15 mg, 5 mg/d till day 7 and 2 mg/d thereafter, n = 50) without induction therapy.
Results:  No differences were observed in the incidence of the composite (biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, graft loss or death) end-point (18% vs. 16%, p = 1.000), biopsy confirmed acute rejection (12% vs. 14%, p = 1.000), one-yr patient (94% vs. 98%, p = 0.308), graft (92% vs. 98%, p = 0.168), and death-censored graft survival (98% vs. 100%, p = 0.317) comparing patients receiving MMF or SRL respectively. Patients receiving SRL showed worse safety outcomes, higher mean creatinine (1.6 ± 0.5 mg/dL vs. 1.4 ± 0.3 mg/dL, p = 0.007), higher proportion of patients with proteinuria (52.0% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.041), higher mean urinary protein concentrations (0.3 ± 0.5 g/L vs. 0.1 ± 0.2 g/L, p = 0.012), higher mean cholesterol concentration (217 mg/dL vs. 190 mg/dL, p = 0.030), and higher proportion of patients prematurely discontinued from randomized therapy (26% vs. 8%, p = 0.031).
Conclusion:  In patients receiving TAC, MMF produced similar efficacy but superior safety profile compared with SRL.     

Improved renal function after conversion from tacrolimus/sirolimus to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the potential nephrotoxicity of sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination. METHODS: We reviewed the course of 97 kidney transplant patients treated with SRL and reduced-dose TAC. Conversion from SRL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was prescribed in a minority (n = 19) for various nonrenal side effects. We compared outcomes of converted patients to those remaining on TAC/SRL (n = 78). RESULTS: TAC levels were increased in converters (P = 0.009). Rejection rates were similar between groups over 18 months (21% vs. 16%, p = ns). Serum creatinine (Cr) and MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups at nadir and six-months, but at 18 months the percent change from six-month Cr was +17% in non-converters vs. -10% in converters (P = 0.004 for the difference). The difference in GFR between groups at 18 months was also significant (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, only conversion to MMF was associated with a greater percent change in Cr from 6 to 18 months (P = 0.015). Conversion to MMF also correlated with higher GFR at 18 months independent of rejection, delayed graft function, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from TAC/SRL to TAC/MMF led to improved renal function despite increased TAC exposure after conversion.     

CMV infections after two doses of daclizumab versus thymoglobulin in renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil, steroids and delayed cyclosporine A.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication after renal transplantation and is involved in graft rejection. The anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibody daclizumab reduces the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the incidence of CMV infection. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized trial compared safety and efficacy, at 1 year, of two doses of daclizumab (54 patients, group D) with thymoglobulin (55 patients, group T) plus delayed cyclosporine (CsA), MMF (mycophenolate mofetil) and steroids in first cadaver kidney transplant patients. Primary criterion was CMV infection/syndrome/disease. D+/R- patients received oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for 90 days. RESULTS: Status for CMV was identical in the both groups. The incidence of CMV infection/syndrome/disease was 39% in group D versus 51% in group T (NS). Time to onset of CMV replication was delayed in group D (P = 0.015) and mean number of pp65-positive cells was lower at 4 and 6 months (P < 0.001). Incidence of symptomatic CMV episodes was not reduced in whole group D (5.6% versus 16.4%, NS), but lower in D+/R+ and D-/R+ patients without chemoprophylaxis, compared to group T (2.8% versus 21.6%, P = 0.028). Patient and graft survivals and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection were identical. CONCLUSIONS: Limited dosing regimen of daclizumab with MMF, steroids and delayed CsA introduction was safe and effective. The incidence of CMV infection was not significantly different, but without chemoprophylaxis, clinical manifestations and viral replication were reduced with this regimen.     

Impact of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil regimen vs. a conventional therapy with steroids on cardiovascular risk in liver transplant patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a steroid‐free regimen with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (modified therapy) vs. a standard regimen of tacrolimus and steroids on the cardiovascular risk score of liver transplant recipients. Patients who received a liver transplant were randomized to a modified therapy (n = 58) or a standard regimen (n = 59). Both groups were balanced at baseline, except for a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p < 0.01) and a higher serum creatinine concentration (p < 0.05) in the modified therapy group. After 12 months, the prevalence of new‐onset DM, arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and changes in cardiovascular risk factors was similar in both groups. The increase in serum creatinine (mg/dL) compared to baseline at one yr post‐transplantation was numerically lower in the modified therapy group (0.22 ± 0.42) than in the standard regimen group (0.41 ± 0.67) (p = 0.068). Although estimated cardiovascular risk score did not vary significantly compared to baseline in either group, there was a slight reduction in the modified regimen (?0.27 ± 2.87) vs. a mild increase (0.17 ± 2.94) in the standard regimen (p = 0.566). In conclusion, a steroid‐free regimen with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil was associated with a trend toward better preservation of kidney function and reduction of cardiovascular risk score.     

Improvement of impaired renal function in heart transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose cyclosporine

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity is a common problem after cardiac transplantation. We have studied the impact of CsA dose reduction in association with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment on renal function in heart transplant recipients with suspected CsA nephrotoxicity (serum creatinine level >2 mg/dl). METHODS: Twelve heart transplant recipients (11 men, 1 woman; 111 to 1813 days after transplantation) with CsA-based immunosuppression (plus azathioprine and/or steroids) and a serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dl were started on a daily dose of 2000 mg of MMF. Dilated cardiomyopathy was the underlying disease in nine patients, ischemic cardiomyopathy in three patients. Mean patient age was 57 years (range 44-69 years). Azathioprine was discontinued and CsA slowly tapered. Creatinine clearance, serum creatinine level, urea nitrogen, and uric acid were monitored. CsA levels were measured, and CsA dose was adjusted for whole blood levels of 70-120 microg/L. Ten patients still had endomyocardial biopsies, whereas one had echocardiographic controls only. RESULTS: One grade 1B rejection episode according to ISHLT (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation) was observed until 1 year after the switch to MMF. One patient was excluded due to gastrointestinal side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from azathioprine to MMF with consecutive reduction of CsA in heart transplant recipients with CsA-impaired renal function improves renal function as evidenced by lower serum creatinine, urea nitrogen, uric acid, and higher creatinine clearance.     

Mycophenolate mofetil for renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients on cyclosporine or tacrolimus: randomized, prospective, multicenter pilot study results

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (LTX) recipients with renal dysfunction may benefit from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and reduction or discontinuation of nephrotoxic calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). The authors report the first randomized, multicenter pilot studies of this approach (one study for patients on cyclosporine [CsA] and one for those on tacrolimus [Tac]). METHODS: Patients 3 to 27 months post-LTX with greater than 20% reduced renal function since LTX, and creatinine 1.8 to 4.0 mg/dL, creatinine clearance 20 to 60 mL/min, or both, were randomized to discontinuation (group 1) or 50% reduction (group 2) of CNI dose, together with MMF 1.5 g administered twice daily and prednisone. Endpoints included measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 52 weeks after study entry and biopsy-proven rejection. RESULTS: In the CsA and Tac trials, 15 and 12 patients, respectively, completed the 52-week follow-up. In the CsA trial, the mean GFR at baseline and week 52 were 35.0 and 57.8 mL/min (>15% improvement, five of six; unchanged, one of six) for group 1 and 46.0 and 63.8 mL/min (>15% improvement, four of nine; unchanged, three of nine; >15% deterioration, two of nine) for group 2. In the Tac trial, GFRs were 55.4 and 56.0 mL/min (>15% improvement, two of five; unchanged, three of five) for group 1 and 46.7 and 60.2 mL/min (>15% improvement, four of seven; unchanged, three of seven) for group 2. Mild or moderate rejection occurred in 38% and 9% of patients in groups 1 and 2 of the CsA trial and in 14% of each group of the patients in the Tac trial. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot studies show that in LTX recipients with renal dysfunction, MMF allows CNI dose reduction or discontinuation, improving or stabilizing GFR in most patients.