序贯疗法和标准三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效比较

目的:观察10d序贯疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,H.pylori)的疗效及不良反应,与14d三联标准疗法比较H.pylori根除情况及经济学上有无优越性.方法:将103例经胃镜检查确诊为慢性胃炎或消化性溃疡且H.pylori阳性的患者随机分为两组,治疗组(10d序贯疗法)52例,前5d埃索美拉唑、阿莫西林,后5d埃索美拉唑、克拉霉素、替硝唑.对照组(14d标准三联疗法)51例,埃索美拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素14d.所有患者停药4wk后复查13C呼气试验或胃镜检查,判断H.pylori根除情况.结果:治疗组H.pylori根除率为90.4%,与对照组(90.2%)比较无统计学差异(P=1.000);两组不良反应发生率分别为12/52(23.1%)、18/51(35.3%),两组比较无统计学差异(P=0.172);治疗组费用为380.6元,较对照组(677.88元)明显减低.结论:10d序贯疗法的H.pylori根除率不低于标准14d三联疗法,2组不良反应发生率相似,但10d序贯疗法根除H.pylori的效价比更高.     

A 13C-urea breath test in children with helicobacter pylori infection: assessment of eradication therapy and follow-up after treatment

Purpose. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of the ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT) for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, for assessment of the efficacy of eradication therapy, and for post-treatment follow-up in children. Methods. Seventy-two patients who underwent endoscopy for symptoms related to the upper gastrointestinal tract were examined by rapid urease test, histology, and culture. The patients were also studied with serology and UBT. Results. Forty-seven of the 72 patients were diagnosed with H. pylori infection, based on the results of biopsy-based tests and serology. As an initial diagnostic test to detect H. pylori infection, the sensitivity of the UBT was 95%, which was comparable with that of histology (94%), rapid urease test (96%), and serology (91%) and was greater than that of culture (79%). The specificity of the UBT was 100%, which was comparable with that of the other four tests. The efficacy of eradication therapy was assessed by biopsy-based tests and the UBT in 24 H. pylori-positive patients. For this purpose, the sensitivities of UBT and histology were 100%, while the sensitivities of culture and the rapid urease test were 88%. The specificity was 100% for all of these tests. Eleven patients were assessed by biopsy-based tests and UBT after more than 6 months of post-treatment follow-up. There were no discordances between the results of the UBT and those of the biopsy-based tests in any of the patients. Conclusions. The UBT may be useful for detecting H. pylori infection in children with upper gastrointestinal tract symptoms, for assessment of the efficacy of eradication therapy, and for the follow-up evaluation of patients after the therapy. Received: November 24, 2000 / Accepted: March 30, 2001     

Dual therapy for third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication and urea breath test prediction

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of a dual therapy with rabeprazole and amoxicillin (AMX) as an empiric third-line rescue therapy. In patients with failure of first-line treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-AMX-clarithromycin regimen and second-line treatment with the PPI-AMX-metronidazole regimen, a third-line eradication regimen with rabeprazole (10 mg q.i.d.) and AMX (500 mg q.i.d.) was prescribed for 2 wk. Eradication was confirmed by the results of the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) at 12 wk after the therapy. A total of 46 patients were included; however, two were lost to follow-up. The eradication rates as determined by per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses were 65.9% and 63.0%, respectively. The pretreatment UBT results in the subjects showing eradication failure; those patients showing successful eradication comprised 32.9 ± 28.8 permil and 14.8 ± 12.8 permil, respectively. The pretreatment UBT results in the subjects with eradication failure were significantly higher than those in the patients with successful eradication (P = 0.019). A low pretreatment UBT result (≤ 28.5 permil) predicted the success of the eradication therapy with a positive predictive value of 81.3% and a sensitivity of 89.7%. Adverse effects were reported in 18.2% of the patients, mainly diarrhea and stomatitis. Dual therapy with rabeprazole and AMX appears to serve as a potential empirical third-line strategy for patients with low values on pretreatment UBT.     

兰索拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效及耐药研究

目的 研究以兰索拉唑为基础的不同治疗方案对幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)根除率的影响并了解湖南地区H.pylori 耐药情况.方法 将76例H.pylori感染患者分成兰索拉唑加克拉霉素、阿莫西林组(LCA组)38例和兰索拉唑加克拉霉素与甲硝唑组(LCM组)38例,治疗1周,治疗前采用快速尿素酶试验(RUT)、14C-尿素呼气试验(14C-UBT)、组织学检查筛选,入选患者进行H.pylori培养及药物敏感性检测.治疗后停用抗生素至少4周行14C-UBT复查.结果 LCA组共有31例完成治疗,26例H.pylori 被根除, 根除率为83.87%;LCM组共有35例完成治疗,21例H.pylori 被根除, 根除率为60.00%.LCA组根除率明显高于LCM组(P＜0.05).阿莫西林、克拉霉素及甲硝唑耐药率分别为0.00%、28.00%和92.00%,对克拉霉素及甲硝唑均耐药率为24.00%;两组药物副作用发生率比较无明显差别(P＞0.05).结论 (1) 兰索拉唑联合克拉霉素、阿莫西林组较联合克拉霉素与甲硝唑组H.pylori根除率高;(2)湖南地区H.pylori对甲硝唑耐药率最高(92.00%),克拉霉素次之(28.00%).尚未发现对阿莫西林耐药的菌株.     

Efficacy of 14-d vs 7-d moxifloxacin-based triple regimens for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of the 14-d moxifloxacinbased triple therapy for the second-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 160 patients who had experienced failure of their first-line proton pump inhibitor-based eradication therapy and subsequently received the moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as a second-line eradication treatment regimen. The patients who were treated with the moxifloxacinbased triple therapy(oral 20 mg rabeprazole b.i.d., 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., and 400 mg moxifloxacin q.d.) for 7 d were assigned to the RAM-7 group(n = 79) while those who took them for 14 days were assigned to RAM-14 group(n = 81). The eradication rates for both groups were determined by intentionto-treat(ITT) and per-protocol(PP) analyses. ITT analysis compared the treatment groups as originally allocated while the PP analysis including only those patients who had completed the treatment as originally allocated. Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as the documentation of a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of the eradication treatment.RESULTS: The overall ITT eradication rate was 76.2%(122/160). The final ITT eradication rates were 70.8%(56/79; 95%CI: 63.3%-77.1%) in the RAM-7 group and 81.4%(66/81; 95%CI: 74.6%-88.3%) in the RAM-14 group(P = 0.034). The overall PP eradication rate was 84.1%(122/145), and the final PP eradication rates were 77.7%(56/72; 95%CI: 70.2%-85.3%) in the RAM-7 group and 90.4%(66/73; 95%CI: 82.8%-98.1%) in the RAM-14 group(P = 0.017). The H. pylori-eradication rates in the RAM-14 group were significantly higher compared with that of the RAM-7 group according to both the ITT(P = 0.034) and the PP analyses(P = 0.017). Both groups exhibited good treatment compliance(RAM-7/RAM-14 group: 100%/100%). The adverse event rates were19.4%(14/72)and 20.5%(15/73)in the RAM-7 and RAM-14 groups,respectively(P=0.441).Adverse events occurred in 14 of the 72 patients(19.4)in the RAM-7 group and in 15 of the 73 patients(20.5)in the RAM-14 group.No statistically significant differences(P=0.441)were observed.CONCLUSION:The 14-d moxifloxacin-based triple therapy is a significantly more effective secondline eradication treatment as compared to the 7-d alternative for H.pylori infection in South Korea.     

Helicobacter pylori antigen stool test and 13C-urea breath test in patients after eradication treatments

OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines recommend either the urea breath test (UBT) or the Helicobacter pylori antigen stool test (HpSA) for monitoring H. pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between the two tests in patients after treatment. METHODS: After eradication treatments, patients were tested with both UBT and HpSA. Cut-off values (delta value over baseline at 30') for UBT were positive (> or = 5 per thousand), indeterminate (3.01-4.99 per thousand), and negative (< or = 3 per thousand). Cut-off values (absorbance at 450 nm) for HpSA test were positive (> or = 0.160), indeterminate (0.159-0.140), and negative (< 0.140). Patients with either discordant or indeterminate tests underwent repeat endoscopy with multiple gastric biopsies for rapid urease test (RUT), culture, histology, and immunohistochemistry to detect H. pylori and to assess the ratio between coccoid and bacillary forms. RESULTS: A total of 458 patients were studied. Of these, 422 (92.2%) had concordant tests, three (0.6%) indeterminate tests (one on UBT and two on HpSA), and 33 (7.2%) discordant tests. A total of 28 patients (25 with discordant and three with indeterminate tests) underwent endoscopy. The HpSA was inaccurate in 24 cases (18 false negative, four false positive, and two indeterminate results), whereas the UBT was inaccurate in four cases (two false positive, one false negative, and one indeterminate results). Biopsy-based tests showed no bacillary or coccoid forms in all five endoscoped patients who were negative on UBT and positive on HpSA, but in one in whom the ratio between coccoid and bacillary forms was 3:1 in the antrum and corpus. CONCLUSIONS: UBT and HpSA test give discordant or indeterminate results in nearly 8% of patients after treatment. The HpSA test is less accurate than the UBT. Coccoid forms do not cause false positive HpSA results.     

Evaluation of 13C-urea breath test to confirm eradication of Helicobacter pylori]

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) for assessment of Helicobacter pylori eradication after treatment. One hundred twenty six patients were enrolled with 85 receiving proton pomp inhibitor based triple therapy. They were underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsies for diagnosis and assessment of H. pylori infection using culture, histology, rapid urease test (RUT) and 13C-UBT. Assessment of eradication needs to be performed 4 weeks or more after completion of treatment. Breath samples were taken 15 minutes after the ingestion of 100 mg 13C-urea. Breath samples were analyzed on a mass spectrometer system. The gold standard for H. pylori infection was a positive culture or positive histology + positive RUT; negative for infection was defined as negative results of all three biopsy tests. Based on ROC curves, the most appropriate cut-off value for diagnosis of H. pylori infection was identified as 2.5/1000, which provided 96.2% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 96.8% accuracy as judged by the gold standard. However, when confirming the eradication of H. pylori, it was 3.5/1000, which provides for 100%, 95.8%, and 96.5%, respectively. Ten patients (11.8%) had delta13C values that were 2.5-5.0/1000 4-12 weeks after therapy. Eight patients were considered cured of H. pylori infection, and 2 were considered to still have H. pylori infection following 13C-UBT, serology, and H. pylori specific antigen test. The false-positive rate of 13C-UBT was 9.4% (8/85). When the grey zone of 13C-UBT was set at a level of 2.5 to 5.0/1000 (2.5 > : negative, 5.0 < or = : positive) after eradication therapy, the sensitivity and specificity of 13C-UBT was 100% and 98.4% compared to the gold standard. It was concluded that to avoid false-positive results of 13C-UBT, the grey zone of 13C-UBT needs to be set at a level of 2.5 to 5.0/1000; thus improving the accuracy of test for the assessment of eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Seven-day triple therapy is a better choice for Helicobacter pylori eradication in regions with low antibiotic resistance

AIM: To investigate whether 7-d triple therapies are still valid in populations with low levels of resistance.METHODS: A total of 1106 Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori)-positive patients were divided into three groups,each of which received one type of 7-d triple therapy. Therapeutic outcomes of the patients were assessed by the 13C-urea breath test at 8 wk after treatment. The susceptibility of H. pylori to antibiotics was determined by an agar-dilution method. Data analysis was performed by χ2 tests.RESULTS: The eradication rates in groups A,B and C were 90.71%(332/366),90.46%(313/346) and 90.87%(189/208),respectively(P = 0.986). The resistance rates were 8.91% for clarithromycin,14.78% for levofloxacin and 0% for amoxicillin. The eradication rate was significantly different between clarithromycin-and levofloxacin-resistant patients(P 0.05) in group A. Patients whose treatment failed in group A also had a higher clarithromycin resistance rate than did successive patients(P = 0.034). However,levofloxacin resistance had no obvious influence on the eradication rate. Furthermore,three main antibiotics(clarithromycin,levofloxacin and amoxicillin) had lower DID(defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day) in this city.CONCLUSION: Clarithromycin resistance is the main reason for the failure of 7-d triple therapy. In populations with low levels of resistance,a 7-d triple therapy is a viable choice. The choice of therapy should not be influenced by conditions in high antibiotic resistance regions.     

Appropriate cut-off value of 13C-urea breath test after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIM: A cut-off value of 2.5 per thousand for the 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is recommended in Japanese persons, based on the result of a multicenter trial in patients prior to treatment for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. The cut-off value of 2.5 per thousand has also been used in the assessment of eradication after treatment. The 6-8-week evaluation after treatment is recommended in the guidelines of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. The present study aimed to prospectively re-assess the cut-off value of the 13C-UBT at 6 weeks after treatment by using the results obtained at 6 months as an indication of true positive or true negative H. pylori infection status. METHODS: One hundred and ninety patients who were positive for H. pylori underwent eradication treatment, and 177 patients of these patients who were assessed as having true positive or true negative H. pylori status at 6 months after treatment were evaluated in this study. Eradication was assessed by 13C-UBT, culture, and histology at 6 weeks and at 6 months after treatment, and the cut-off value of 13C-UBT at 6 weeks was re-assessed. RESULTS: A cut-off value of 3.5 per thousand. at 6 weeks after treatment showed 97.2% diagnostic accuracy, while a cut-off value of 2.5 per thousand at 6 weeks showed 96.0% diagnostic accuracy. For a 3.5 per thousand cut-off value, only five patients were positive by 13C-UBT and were negative by culture and histology at 6 weeks, and three patients were true positive and two were false positive by the 13C-UBT at 6 months. CONCLUSION: A cut-off value of 3.5 per thousand for the 13C-UBT is recommended at 6 weeks after eradication treatment in Japanese persons.     

Standard triple versus levofloxacin based regimen for eradication of Helicobacter pylori

AIM: To compare the eradication rates for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and ulcer recurrence of standard triple therapy (STT) and levofloxacin based therapy (LBT). METHODS: Seventy-four patients with perforated duodenal ulcer treated with simple closure and found to be H. pylori infected on 3 mo follow up were randomized to receive either the STT group comprising of amoxicillin 1 g bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and omeprazole 20 mg bid or the LBT group comprising of amoxicillin 1 g bid, levofloxacin 500 mg bid and omeprazole 20 mg bid for 10 d each. The H. pylori eradication rates, side effects, compliance and the recurrence of ulcer were assessed in the two groups at 3 mo follow up. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients in the STT group and 32 patients in the levofloxacin group presented at 3 mo follow up. H. pylori eradication rates were similar with STT and the LBT groups on intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (69% vs 80%, P = 0.425) and (79% vs 87%, P = 0.513) by per-protocol (PP) analysis respectively. Ulcer recurrence in the STT and LBT groups on ITT analysis was (20% vs 14%, P = 0.551) and (9% vs 6%, P = 1.00) by PP analysis. Compliance and side effects were also comparable between the groups. A complete course of STT costs Indian Rupees (INR) 1060.00, while LBT costs only INR 360.00. CONCLUSION: H. pylori eradication rates and the rate of ulcer recurrence were similar between the STT and LBT. The LBT is a more economical option compared to STT.     

Comparable Helicobacter pylori eradication rates obtained with 4- and 7-day rabeprazole-based triple therapy: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor, which has been reported to induce a faster acid suppression than other drugs of the same category. This might be useful to reduce the duration of anti-Helicobacter therapies. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess whether there is the possibility of shortening a rabeprazole-based triple therapy from 7 to 4 days without compromising its efficacy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. PATIENTS: A total of 128 consecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection were recruited for this controlled, randomized, open and parallel-group trial comparing the efficacy of two durations of the same rabeprazole-based triple therapy. METHODS: All patients were subdivided to receive a combination of rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (RCM) for 4 days (n = 63) and for 7 days (n = 65). At baseline, they underwent breath 13C-urea test and endoscopy with biopsies for rapid urease testing and histology to confirm infection with H. pylori. Eradication was determined by a negative 13C-urea breath test within 28-32 days after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Overall eradication rates were similar for patients treated with the 4- and the 7-day periods (intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed a success rate of 81% versus 78% and 88% versus 85%, respectively; P = NS). Tolerance was similar in both groups. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and only two patients were withdrawn because of them. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate of the 4-day regimen was equivalent to that of the same 7-day regimen based on rabeprazole plus clarithromycin and metronidazole. Therefore, the 4-day regimen of RCM seems to give us the possibility of adopting a shorter-than-usual duration of therapy against H. pylori.     

不同疗程三联方案根除幽门螺杆菌后的复发情况

目的观察不同疗程奥美拉唑三联方案根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)后的复发率。方法Hp阳性的干二指肠溃疡103例患者,随机分为二组:A组50例;B组53例。均给予奥美拉唑20 mg(每日2次)、阿莫西林1.0 g(每日2次)、呋喃唑酮0.1 g(每日3次),A组疗程2周,B组疗程1周。观察2组Hp根除率、溃疡复发率、3年Hp复发率及不良反应。结果A组Hp根除率、溃疡愈合率、Hp根除者3年累积复发率分别为92.0%、96.0%、8.7%;B组分别为88.7%、92.5%、12.8%,两组三项差异均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论1周和2周疗程方案近、远期疗效相同,但1周疗程方案疗程短,病人依从性好,费用减半,效-价比优于2 周疗程方案。     

Rabeprazole,clarithromycin, and amoxicillin Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: Report of an efficacy study

AIM:To investigate the efficacy of a standard triple therapy(comprising rabeprazole,clarithromycin,and amoxicillin)for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication,noting factors that influence the outcome and documenting any adverse events.METHODS:Following institutional ethical approval,fifty consecutive and consenting symptomatic patients with evidence of H.pylori infection by either a positive urea breath test(UBT)and/or a campylobacter-like organism test who presented to the Gastroenterology clinic of Lagos State University Teaching Hospital between 2012 and 2013 were recruited into the study.Patients were openly randomized to either a 7-d or a 10-d regimen of amoxicillin 1 g,clarithromycin 500mg and rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily.The extent of symptom resolution was noted following the treatment,and at the end of one month after the completion oftreatment,a repeat UBT was performed in each patient to document the eradication of the infection.All data(demographics,symptoms,and eradication rates)were collated and analyzed with SPSS version 18.RESULTS:Forty-seven patients completed the study(three were excluded from the analysis for breaching the study protocol).The patients included 18 males and 29 females within the age range of 13-80 years(mean 43.7,SD 16.8).The clinical features of the study subjects were dyspepsia,reflux symptoms and features of gastrointestinal bleeding.The average eradication rate was 87.2%.Eighteen subjects were enrolled in the 7-d arm,while 29 were in the 10-d arm.There was no statistically significant difference in the age or sex distributions of the two arms.There was no significant advantage of the 10-d treatment duration over the 7-d duration(P=0.78),and the eradication outcomes were not influenced by the gender or age of the subjects.No adverse effects were reported in either arm.CONCLUSION:The triple therapy regime,employing a combination of amoxicillin,clarithromycin and rabeprazole,showed great efficacy and safety in the eradication of H.pylori,and this outcome was not influenced by gender or age.No difference was observed between the 7-d and 10-d regimens.     

Efficacy of quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication after failure of proton pump inhibitor‐based triple therapy in Singapore

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication is the mainstay in the treatment of H. pylori‐associated peptic ulcer disease. Current standard eradication therapy consists of 1 week of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antibiotics selected from amoxicillin, metronidazole and clarithromycin. In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy of quadruple therapy consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetra‐cycline and metronidazole in patients for whom initial H. pylori eradication using a triple therapy regimen consisting of a PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin was unsuccessful. METHODS: Consecutive patients with H. pylori‐associated peptic ulcer disease, in whom H. pylori with triple therapy had been unsuccessful, were included in the study. These patients had been treated with a regimen that included a PPI (standard dose twice daily), amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) and clarithro­mycin (500 mg twice daily) for 1 week during 1997?2001. Diagnosis of peptic ulcer disease was made at esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Helicobacter pylori infection was considered to be present on the basis of either a positive rapid urease test, positive histo­logical identification of H. pylori or both. Failure of initial H. pylori eradication was established with either a rapid urease test, a ¹³C urea breath test or histology. Quadruple therapy consisted of a PPI (standard dose twice daily), metronidazole (400 mg three times daily), tetracycline (500 mg four times daily) and bismuth subcitrate (240 mg twice daily). Failure of quadruple therapy was diagnosed on the basis of a positive ¹³C urea breath test. RESULTS: Fifty‐three patients received quadruple therapy. The median age was 52 years (range 20?74) and the male to female ratio was 42 : 11. On an intent‐to‐treat basis, the eradication rate was 69.8%, whereas on a per‐protocol basis, the eradication rate was 82.2%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that a 1‐week quadruple therapy regime consisting of a PPI, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole was effective in 82.2% of patients who experienced an unsuccessful initial H. pylori eradication attempt with PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin.     

Furazolidone-based triple and quadruple eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of furazolidone-based triple and quadruple therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in a multi-center randomized controlled trial.METHODS: A total of 720 H. pylori positive patients with duodenal ulcer disease were enrolled at 10 different hospitals in Jiangxi province in China. The patients were randomly assigned to four treatment groups as follows: patients in Groups 1 and 3 received rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (1000 mg) and furazolidone (100 mg) twice daily for 7 and 10 d, respectively; patients in Groups 2 and 4 received rabeprazole (10 mg), bismuth (220 mg), amoxicillin (1000 mg) and furazolidone (100 mg) twice daily for 7 and 10 d, respectively. The primary outcome measure was H. pylori eradication rate 4 wk after treatment by intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, while the secondary outcome measures were symptom and sign changes at the end of treatment and 4 wk after the end of treatment, as well as the proportion of patients who developed adverse events.RESULTS: The demographic data of the four groups were not significantly different. Overall, 666 patients completed the scheme and were re-assessed with the ¹³C-urea breath test. The intention-to-treat analysis of the H. pylori eradication rates in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 74.44%, 82.78%, 78.89% and 86.11%, respectively. The H. pylori eradication rate in Group 4 was significantly higher than that in Group 1. According to the per protocol analysis, the H. pylori eradication rates in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 81.21%, 89.22%, 85.54% and 92.26%, respectively. The H. pylori eradication rate in Group 4 was significantly higher than that in Group 1. The number of adverse events was 15 (8.3%), 16 (8.9%), 15 (8.3%) and 17 (9.4%) in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively, including dizziness, vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, skin rash, itchy skin, and malaise. The symptoms were relieved without special treatment in all of the patients.CONCLUSION: Both 7- and 10-d quadruple furazolidone-based therapies achieve satisfactory H. pylori eradication rates.     

Moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy after non-bismuth quadruple therapy failure for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To assess the efficacy of moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy after non-bismuth quadruple therapy failure for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) eradication.METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2012,we screened individuals who were prescribed non-bismuth quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Among them,a total of 98 patients who failed non-bismuth quadruple therapy received 1-wk or 2-wk moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy(400 mg moxifloxacin once daily,and 20 mg of rabeprazole and 1 g of amoxicillin twice daily). H. pylori status was evaluated using the 13C-urea breath test 4 wk later,after treatment completion. The eradication rates were determined by intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses.RESULTS: In total,60 and 38 patients received 1-wk and 2-wk moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy,respectively. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 56.7%(95%CI: 45.0-70.0) and 59.6%(95%CI: 46.6-71.7) in the 1-wk group and 76.3%(95%CI: 63.2-89.5) and 80.6%(95%CI: 66.7-91.9) in the 2-wk group(P = 0.048 and 0.036,respectively). All groups had good compliance(95% vs 94.9%). Neither group showed serious adverse events,and the proportions of patients experiencing mild side effects were not significantly different(21.1% vs 13.9%). Clinical factors such as age,sex,alcohol and smoking habits,comorbidities,and presence of gastric or duodenal ulcer did not influence the eradication therapy efficacy. The efficacy of second-line eradication therapy did not differ significantly according to the firstline regimen.CONCLUSION: Two-week moxifloxacin-containing triple therapy showed better efficacy than a 1-wk regimen after non-bismuth quadruple therapy failure.Key words: Helicobacter pylori; Moxifloxacin-based triple; Non-bismuth quadruple; Second-line; Eradication     

Standard triple, bismuth pectin quadruple and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of standard triple, bismuth pectin quadruple and sequential therapies for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) eradication in a randomized, double-blinded, comparative clinical trial in China. METHODS: A total of 215 H. pylori -positive patients were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated into three groups: group A (n = 72) received a 10-d bismuth pectin quadruple therapy (20 mg rabeprazole bid , 1000 mg amoxicillin bid , 100 mg bismuth pectin qid , and 500 mg levofloxaci...     

8d与10d序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效比较

目的:比较雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素、奥硝唑组成的8d与10d序贯疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)的疗效.方法:将经胃镜检查确诊为慢性胃炎和消化性溃疡,且H.pylori阳性的217例患者随机分为2组,8d组(n=104)方案:前4d,雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林;后4d,雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+奥硝唑.10d组(n=113)方案:前5d,雷贝拉唑+阿莫西林;后5d,雷贝拉唑+克拉霉素+奥硝唑.根除治疗后复查14C-尿素呼气试验,比较两组H.pylori根除率.结果:8d组和10d组H.pyloriITT根除率分别为89.3%和91.2%,PP根除率分别为92.0%和93.7%.两种分析方法比较两组的根除率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但8d序贯疗法降低了成本-效果比,减轻了患者的经济负担.两种方案症状缓解率及不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:8d序贯疗法可以获得较高的H.pylori根除率和症状缓解率,且经济、安全,是一种可供选择的一线治疗方案.     

Adjuvant probiotics improve the eradication effect of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM:To investigate whether the addition of probiotics can improve the eradication effect of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) infection. METHODS:This open randomized trial recruited 234 H. pylori positive gastritis patients from seven local centers. The patients were randomized to one-week standard triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid , clarithromycin 500 mg bid , and amoxicillin 1000 mg bid ; OCA group, n = 79); two weeks of pre-treatment with probiotics, containing 3 × 107 Lactobacillus acidophilus per day, prior to one week of triple therapy (POCA group, n = 78); or one week of triple therapy followed by two weeks of the same probiotics (OCAP group, n = 77). Successful eradication was defined as a negative C13 or C14 urease breath test four weeks after triple therapy. Patients were asked to report associated symptoms at baseline and during follow-up, and side effects related to therapy were recorded. Data were analyzed by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) methods. RESULTS:PP analysis involved 228 patients, 78 in the OCA, 76 in the POCA and 74 in the OCAP group. Successful eradication was observed in 171 patients; by PP analysis, the eradication rates were significantly higher (P = 0.007 each) in the POCA (62/76; 81.6%, 95% CI 72.8%-90.4%) and OCAP (61/74; 82.4%, 95% CI 73.6%-91.2%) groups than in the OCA group (48/78; 61.5%, 95% CI 50.6%-72.4%). ITT analysis also showed that eradication rates were significantly higher in the POCA (62/78; 79.5%, 95% CI 70.4%-88.6%) and OCAP (61/77; 79.2%, 95% CI 70%-88.4%) groups than in the OCA group (48/79; 60.8%, 95% CI 49.9%-71.7%), (P = 0.014 and P = 0.015). The symptom relieving rates in the POCA, OCAP and OCA groups were 85.5%, 89.2% and 87.2%, respectively. Only one of the 228 patients experienced an adverse reaction. CONCLUSION:Administration of probiotics before or after standard triple therapy may improve H. pylori eradication rates.     

Comparison of a monoclonal antigen stool test （Hp STAR） with the ^13C-urea breath test in monitoring Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy

AIM: To evaluate the agreement between a mAb-based stool test (HP StAR) and the urea breath test (UBT) in monitoring (H pylori) infection after eradication therapy. METHODS: Patients with discordant results on UBT and Hp StAR underwent endoscopy with biopsies for rapid urease test, culture, and histology to confirm H pylori status. RESULTS: Among 250 patients (50±14 years), 240 (96.0%) had concordant UBT and Hp StAR tests with a significant correlation between DOB and 4 values (R=0.87; P<0.0001). The remaining 10 (4.0%) patients had discordant tests (positive Hp StAR and negative UBT) with the Hp StAR inaccurate in five cases (false positive) and UBT inaccurate in the other five cases (false negative). The "maximal expected" sensitivity, specificity, +PV, -PV, +LR, and -LR were 91%, 100%, 100%, 97.4%,∞, and 8.2 respectively, for the UBT, and 100%, 97.4%, 91%, 100%, 38.8, and 0, respectively, for the Hp StAR. Overall accuracy for both tests was 98%. CONCLUSION: Both the UBT and the Hp StAR are equally accurate in monitoring H pylori infection. Nowadays, the choice of the "best" non-invasive H pylori test in the post-treatment setting should be done not only in terms of diagnostic accuracy but also in view of cost and local facilities.