Biofeedback for the treatment of fecal incontinence

Biofeedback therapy has been proposed as a treatment for fecal incontinence with good, short-term results. PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess long-term clinical results of biofeedback therapy compared with medical therapy alone and to assess manometric results in patients treated with biofeedback. METHODS: Two groups of incontinent patients were studied. Group 1 consisted of 16 patients (3 males and 13 females; mean age, 59.9 years). Etiologies treated by biofeedback included descending perineum syndrome (7), postfistula or hemorroidectomy (4), and miscellaneous (5). Group 2 consisted of eight patients (two males, six females; mean age, 62.2 years). Etiologies treated with medical treatment alone (including enema and antidiarrheal therapy) included descending perineum syndrome (3), postfistula or hemorroidectomy (2), and miscellaneous (3). The incontinence score was initially 17.81±3.27 (standard deviation) in Group 1 and 17.0±2.77 in Group 2. Resting pressure of the upper and lower anal sphincter, maximum squeezing pressure, and duration of contraction were not initially different in Groups 1 and 2 but were significantly lower than in the control group of patients without incontinence (n=12; 8 males, 4 females; mean age, 66.4 years) (P<0.05). Follow-up duration was 30 months, with intermediate clinical score at 6 months for Group 1. RESULTS: After biofeedback therapy, the incontinence score at 30 months was lower in Group 1 (14.43±6.35 vs.17.81 ±3.27;P<0.035) and unchanged in Group 2 (18.0±2.72 vs.17.0±2.77). However, in Group 1 the score at 6 months was much lower than at 30 months (6.31±7.81 vs.14.43±6.35;P<0.001). Only the amplitude of voluntary contraction and upper anal pressure (51.1 (range, 27–90) vs 36.7 (range, 20–80) mmHg) were significantly increased (81.5 (range, 55–120) vs.62.1 (range, 30–90) mmHg;P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Biofeedback improved continence at 6 months and at 30 months. However, the score at 6 months was much better, suggesting that the initial good results may deteriorate over a long time. These data suggest that it could be useful to reinitiate biofeedback therapy in some patients.     

Biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the functional results of biofeedback training in patients with fecal incontinence in relation to clinical presentation and anorectal manometry results. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with fecal incontinence were treated with biofeedback training using anorectal manometry pressure for visual feedback. Ten patients had passive incontinence only, six patients had urge incontinence, and ten patients had combined passive and urge incontinence. RESULTS: Patients with urge incontinence had a lower maximum voluntary contraction pressure (92 ± 12 mmHg) and lower maximum tolerable volume (78 ± 13 ml) than patients with passive incontinence (140 ± 43 mmHg and 166 ± 73 ml). Twenty-two patients completed the treatment, five patients (23 percent) showed excellent improvement, nine patients (41 percent) had good results, and eight (36 percent) patients showed no improvement. At follow-up on average of 21 months after therapy, 41 percent of our patients reported continued improvement. The maximum tolerable volume was higher in those with excellent (140.4 ± 6.8 ml) or good (156.3 ± 6.64 ml) results of therapy than it was in those with poor results (88.5 ± 2.5 ml). Greater asymmetry of the anal sphincter also correlated to poor results. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback therapy improved continence immediately after training and at follow-up after 21 months, but the initial results were better. The urge fecal incontinence seems to be related to function of the external anal sphincter and to the maximum tolerable volume. Low maximum tolerable volume and anal sphincter asymmetry were associated with a poor outcome of therapy     

Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in geriatric patients

Eighteen fecally incontinent geriatric patients were first treated for constipation as a possible cause of incontinence, and the 13 who remained incontinent were provided sphincter biofeedback training. Half the patients were instructed to perform 50 sphincter exercises per day for a four-week period prior to the start of biofeedback training to determine whether such exercises would improve bowel control in the absence of biofeedback training. Sphincter exercises alone did not produce clinical improvements and did not significantly increase the strength of sphincter contractions. Biofeedback training did significantly augment sphincter strength and was associated with greater than 75 per cent decreases in incontinence for 10 (77 per cent) of the patients. Improvements were maintained in 60 per cent at six months and in 42 per cent at one year. Thus biofeedback training appears to be of specific value in the treatment of fecal incontinence in geriatric patients.     

Prospective evaluation of transanal irrigation for fecal incontinence and constipation

Background

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of transanal irrigation on bowel function and quality of life in a prospective cohort of Danish patients with fecal incontinence or constipation.

Methods

Patients with fecal incontinence or constipation of heterogeneous origin were treated by a specialist nurse at the Anal Physiology Clinic/Department of Surgery at Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. If satisfactory results were not obtained after conservative bowel management, patients were instructed in the use the transanal irrigation procedure and were consecutively recruited for this observational cohort study in the period from March 2010 to September 2013. Patients completed questionnaires regarding bowel function, quality of life and the transanal irrigation procedure at baseline and after 12 months.

Results

A total of 507 were introduced to transanal irrigation. Eighty-three percent were females. The median age was 56 (range 19–86) years. At follow-up, 216 (43%) patients still used transanal irrigation, 174 (34%) reported that they had discontinued the treatment for various reasons, while no response was obtained from the remaining 117 (23%) patients. The main reason for not adhering to the treatment was an unsatisfactory outcome, which was reported by 86 (49.4%) of those who discontinued the treatment. Among patients still using the procedure at follow-up, a statistically significant improvement of bowel function scores (St. Marks/Wexner incontinence score, Wexner constipation score and obstructed defecation syndrome score) was detected: the Wexner incontinence score decreased from 12.4 at baseline to 10.2 at follow-up (p < 0.001); the St. Marks incontinence score decreased from 14.9 to 12.7 (p < 0.001); the Wexner constipation score decreased from 14.3 to 12.4 (p < 0.001); and the obstructed defecation syndrome score also dropped, from 15.1 to 11.8 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the influence of bowel dysfunction on daily activities and quality of life diminished significantly, while the general satisfaction with bowel function increased significantly (p < 0.001 in all three measures).

Conclusions

Bowel function and quality of life improved in the group of patients adhering to transanal irrigation after 12 months. However, more than one-third of the patients discontinued the treatment within the first year with transanal irrigation. Thus, further studies are needed in order to identify factors predicting success and failure with this treatment and to improve supervision during initiation and follow-up.

     

Biofeedback treatment is ineffective in neurogenic fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess biofeedback treatment (active sphincter exercises under direct electromyography vision) in neurogenic fecal incontinence. METHODS: Twelve patients with neurogenic fecal incontinence have been studied prospectively. External sphincter contractions were exercised under direct electromyographic vision twice per day for 30 minutes during 12 weeks. Manometry was done at the beginning and after 12 weeks of training to evaluate objectively changes in sphincter functions. RESULTS: No patient experienced any improvement in fecal control. Mean resting pressure increased from 7 to 9 kPa and mean squeeze pressure from 3.9 to 4.9 kPA, which was of no statistical significance (P =0.20 and P =0.46, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: External sphincter contraction exercises under direct electromyographic vision are not effective in neurogenic fecal incontinence. Degree of continence does not improve, and external sphincter function is not increased significantly.     

Biofeedback training is useful in fecal incontinence but disappointing in constipation

BACKGROUND: Successful biofeedback therapy has been reported in the treatment of fecal incontinence and constipation. It is uncertain which groups of incontinent patients benefit from biofeedback, and our impression has been that biofeedback is more successful for incontinence than for constipation. PURPOSE: This study was designed to review the results of biofeedback therapy at the Lahey Clinic. METHODS: Biofeedback was performed using an eightchannel, water-perfused manometry system. Patients saw anal canal pressures as a color bar graph on a computer screen. Assessment after biofeedback was by manometry and by telephone interview with an independent researcher. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (13 women and 2 men) with incontinence underwent a mean of three (range, 1–7) biofeedback sessions. The cause was obstetric (four patients), postsurgical (five patients), and idiopathic (six patients). Complete resolution of symptoms was reported in four patients, considerable improvement in four patients, and some improvement in three patients. Manometry showed a mean increase of 15.3 (range, ?3–30) mmHg in resting pressure and 35.7 (range, 13–57) mmHg in squeezing pressure after biofeedback. A successful outcome could not be predicted on the basis of cause, severity of incontinence, or initial manometry. Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men) with constipation underwent a mean of three (range, 1–14) biofeedback sessions. Each had manometric evidence of paradoxic nonrelaxing external sphincter or puborectalis muscle confirmed by defography or electromyography. All patients could be taught to relax their sphincter in response to bearing down. Despite this, only one patient reported resolution of symptoms, three patients had reduced straining, and three patients had some gain in insight. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback helped 73 percent of patients with fecal incontinence, and its use should be considered regardless of the cause or severity of incontinence or of results on initial manometry. In contrast, biofeedback directed at correcting paradoxic external sphincter contraction has been disappointing.     

Endoanal ultrasonography in fecal incontinence: Current and future perspectives

Fecal incontinence has a profound impact in a patient’s life, impairing quality of life and carrying a substantial economic burden due to health costs. It is an underdiagnosed condition because many affected patients are reluctant to report it and also clinicians are usually not alert to it. Patient evaluation with a detailed clinical history and examination is very important to indicate the type of injury that is present. Endoanal ultrasonography is currently the gold standard for sphincter evaluation in fecal incontinence and is a simple, well-tolerated and non-expensive technique. Most studies revealed 100% sensitivity in identifying sphincter defect. It is better than endoanal magnetic resonance imaging for internal anal sphincter defects, equivalent for the diagnosis of external anal sphincter defects, but with a lower capacity for assessment of atrophy of this sphincter. The most common cause of fecal incontinence is anal sphincter injury related to obstetric trauma. Only a small percentage of women are diagnosed with sphincter tears immediately after vaginal delivery, but endoanal ultrasonography shows that one third of these women have occult sphincter defects. Furthermore, in patients submitted to primary repair of these tears, ultrasound revealed a high frequency of persistent sphincter defects after surgery. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography is currently largely used and accepted for sphincter evaluation in fecal incontinence, improving diagnostic accuracy and our knowledge of physiologic and pathological sphincters alterations. Conversely, there is currently no evidence to support the use of elastography in fecal incontinence evaluation.     

Sphincter repair for fecal incontinence

Twenty-seven patients who had sphincter repair by one surgeon over the last ten years were reviewed. Previous surgery, childbirth, and perineal trauma were the most common causes. Twelve patients had been treated previously using an anal continence device (N = 6), postanal repair (N = 5), and rectopexy (N = 1). A covering colostomy was used in ten patients. At the initial operation only 7 patients were rendered completely continent, 13 others were improved, but results were poor in the other 7. Four of the 7 patients were rendered completely continent after secondary operations. Maximum anal pressure and maximum squeeze pressure did not change significantly after surgery; however, preoperative maximum squeeze pressure in patients who achieved complete continence was significantly greater than in those that did not. Poor results usually were associated with severe obstetric trauma.     

Bilateral gluteoplasty for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: This study describes our clinical experience with adynamic bilateral gluteoplasty in 20 patients with total fecal incontinence, in whom a sphincter repair had failed (n=17) or was nonviable. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1995, 12 women and 8 men ranging in age from 15 to 58 (mean, 37) years underwent different techniques of adynamic gluteoplasty. The indications for the operation were congenital anomalies, denervation, or sphincter destruction. Postoperative evaluation was clinical (Pescatori grading; self-evaluation) and manometric. RESULTS: Morbidity was only related to wound infection (n=7) requiring late reoperations for neosphincter repair (n=5), anal stenosis (n=2), and incisional hernia after colostomy closure (n= 1). Two other patients with no complications also had further surgery for tightening of the neosphincter; they had a successful outcome. Of the 17 evaluable patients, 9 (53 percent) achieved normal control or were graded as Pescatori A-1, A-2, B-1, or C-1, 1 (6 percent) as Pescatori C-2, and 7 (41 percent) as Pescatori C-3. Six patients (35 percent) judged their results as excellent, three (18 percent) as good, one (6 percent) as fair, and seven (41 percent) as bad. Eight patients are able to retain 200 ml of water instilled into the rectum for between five minutes and two hours. For the nine patients with better results, the mean ± standard deviation of the differences between postgluteoplasty and pregluteoplasty anal pressures were 40±25 mmHg (resting pressure) and 122±85 mmHg (squeeze pressure). These findings demonstrate a tonic and voluntary activity of the plasty. The author's technique has less morbidity, and excellent or good results were achieved in 67 percent of the patients. Failures were attributable to suture disruption (n=4), poor muscular contraction (n=2), and intractable constipation (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Adynamic gluteoplasty is efficient for achieving good or very good continence status in a higher proportion of patients than with other adynamic muscle transfer procedures.Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.     

Treatment options for fecal incontinence

PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence is a socially devastating disorder which affects at least 2.2 percent of community dwelling adults and 45 percent of nursing home residents. Most incontinent patients can be helped, but physicians are poorly informed about treatment options. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus on treatment options by convening a conference of surgeons, gastroenterologists, nurses, psychologists, and patient advocates. METHOD: A 1-1/2 day conference was held in April, 1999. Experts from different disciplines gave overviews, followed by extended discussions. Consensus statements were developed at the end of the conference. This summary statement was drafted, circulated to all participants, and revised based on their input. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Diarrhea is the most common aggravating factor for fecal incontinence, and antidiarrheal medications such as loperamide and diphenoxylate or bile acid binders may help. Fecal impaction, a common cause of fecal incontinence in children and elderly patients, responds to combinations of laxatives, education, and habit training in approximately 60 percent. These causes of fecal incontinence can usually be identified by history and physical examination alone. 2) In patients who fail medical management or have evidence of sphincter weakness, anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound are recommended as helpful in differentiating simple morphologic defects from afferent and efferent nerve injuries and from combined structural and neurologic injuries. 3) Biofeedback is a harmless and inexpensive treatment which benefits approximately 75 percent of patients but cures only about 50 percent. It may be most appropriate when there is neurologic injury (i.e., partial denervation), but it has been reported to also benefit incontinent patients with minor structural defects. 4) External anal sphincter plication with or without pelvic floor repair is indicated when there is a known, repairable structural defect without significant neurologic injury. It is effective in approximately 68 percent. 5) Salvage operations are reserved for patients who can not benefit from biofeedback or levator-sphincteroplasty. These include electrically stimulated gracilis muscle transpositions and colostomy. 6) Antegrade enemas delivered through stomas in the cecum or descending colon reduce or eliminate soiling in approximately 78 percent of children with myelomeningocele; this operation may come to be more widely applied. 7) Investigational treatments include implanted nerve stimulators, artificial sphincters, and anal plugs. 8) Patient characteristics which influence choice of treatment include mental status, mobility impairment, and typical bowel habits. 9) Additional research is needed to better define the mechanisms responsible for fecal incontinence, to assess the efficacy of these treatments, to develop better treatments for nursing home residents, and to identify predictors of outcome.     

Anal sphincter imaging in fecal incontinence using endosonography

Clinical anal examination, manometry (resting and squeeze pressures), and single-fiber electromyography were compared with endosonography of the anal sphincters in 14 patients with fecal incontinence. Technical aspects of the procedure and normal imaging of the puborectal muscle and both sphincters were defined. Defects in both sphincters were seen in nine patients. The defect is visualized as a clear discontinuity in the muscular ring. Compared with the conventional studies, anal endosonography gave significant information in six patients (four male patients after perianal surgery and two women), showing sphincter defects in five patients and integrity of the sphincters in another one. This information obtained by endosonography was important in understanding the type and extension of the lesion and deciding upon the surgical repair. Anal endosonography is an imaging technique of the sphincters that can assess their integrity in fecal incontinence.     

Obstetric fecal incontinence

During the last five years, 37 patients with fecal incontinence because of childbirth have been investigated. Ages varied from 22 to 62 years and duration of symptoms from 0.3 to 26 years. Anal manometry was performed in all patients and electromyography was performed in 24 patients. Thirty patients underwent delayed sphincter repair. In all patients, a dehiscence was found anteriorly, bridged by scar tissue. Continence was restored in 25 patients (83 percent). Electromyography was performed postoperatively in patients who remained incontinent and who demonstrated severe denervation. All these patients had undergone previous sphincter repair. In seven patients, there were no signs of obstetric injury. Electromyography demonstrated severe denervation, but sphincter mapping did not demonstrate muscle discontinuity. Continence improved in four patients within one year as a result of reinnervation demonstrated by electromyography. The authors conclude that fecal incontinence after childbirth may be due to either obstetric rupture or denervation. Both disorders may coexist. Delayed sphincter repair gives excellent results provided that denervation is not present. Preoperative assessment with electromyography is mandatory.     

Geriatric fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a common problem in the elderly population,particularly in nursing homes, and is one of the common reasons for nursing home placement. In addition to the inconvenience of the incontinence for the patient and caregiver, it is associated with increased mortality. Identifiable physiologic changes in the anorectal region may contribute to the development of fecal incontinence.Fecal incontinence is a disorder of men and women, with an equal or greater prevalence in men in advancing years. All patients who have fecal incontinence warrant an initial medical evaluation,including the exclusion of fecal impaction. Cognitively impaired patients benefit most from habit training. Selected elderly patients who have fecal incontinence may benefit from biofeedback and surgical intervention.     

Internal anal sphincter augmentation for fecal incontinence using injectable silicone biomaterial

PURPOSE: A disrupted or weak internal anal sphincter can lead to passive fecal incontinence. This muscle is not amenable to direct surgical repair. Previous preliminary attempts to restore functional continuity have included a cutaneous flap to fill an anal canal defect, and injection therapy using polytetrafluoroethylene, collagen, or autologous fat. Urologists have also used injections of collagen or silicone to enhance bladder neck function. This pilot study aimed to assess the efficacy of single or multiple injections of the silicone-based product Bioplastique for the symptoms of passive fecal incontinence caused by an anatomically disrupted or intact but weak internal anal sphincter. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients (6 females; median age, 64 ; range, 41–80 years) with passive incontinence secondary to a weak (n=6) or disrupted (n=4) internal anal sphincter were injected either circumferentially or at a single site, respectively. Patients were assessed before and six weeks after treatment by clinical assessment, two-week bowel diary card, anorectal physiologic testing, and endoanal ultrasound. Patients failing to show improvement after the first injection were offered a second injection six weeks after the first injection. Clinical assessment was further repeated at six months, and five patients had a further ultrasound examination. RESULTS: At six weeks, six of ten patients showed either marked improvement (n=3) or complete cessation of leakage (n=3). A further patient was greatly improved after a second injection. Three patients were not improved. At six months, two of the seven patients had maintained marked improvement, and one patient had maintained minor improvement; all of these three patients had circumferential multiple injections. Maximum resting and squeeze anal pressures did not differ significantly between beforevs. six weeks aftervs. six months after injection. At six weeks endoanal ultrasound (n=9) confirmed the presence and correct position of the silicone in all but one patient who had experienced obvious external leakage of the product. At six months the silicone remained in the correct position in the five endosonographically assessed patients. Five of the initial patients experienced pain or minor ulceration at the injection site. CONCLUSIONS: Although clinically effective immediately after injection, the benefit of an injectable biomaterial was maintained in only a minority of patients. This occurred despite the continued presence of material in the correct anatomical site. Patients with diffuse weakness treated by circumferential injection seemed to be the most responsive, but further studies are required to clarify this.Uroplasty, Ltd., Reading, United Kingdom, provided the materials for this study.