The photopic negative response of flash ERG in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy

Purpose To evaluate with electrophysiological responses and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), the short term functional and structural effects at the macula following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab for macular edema. Methods Prospective, non-randomized, interventional case study. In total, 17 eyes of 17 patients with macular edema due to vein occlusions and diabetic retinopathy received intravitreal bevacizumab. All Patients underwent complete ophthalmic examination including Snellen visual acuity testing, Multifocal Electroretinography (mfERG) and Full Field Electroretinography (FERG), OCT scanning at baseline at 1 week and 2 months after intravitreal bevacizumab. Results FERG did not show any change in waveform parameters following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Average mfERG macular responses within central 20° showed increased P₁ amplitude (P < 0.05) at 2 months after treatment as compared to the baseline recordings in all subjects. No changes were seen in the implicit time. There was 22% improvement in central retinal thickness (CRT) at 2 months compared to the baseline (P < 001). Conclusion Intravitreal injection bevacizumab resulted in reduction in the central retinal thickness and mild to moderate improvement in the mfERG amplitudes in this short-term study. The visual acuity changes did not directly correlate with the reduced central retinal thickness or improvement in mfERG. The short-term results showed no serious ocular adverse effects. Therefore on short-term follow up the off label drug showed improvement of macular edema secondary to vein occlusion and diabetic retinopathy with no demonstrable toxic effects.     

Early intravitreal bevacizumab for non‐ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of early intravitreal bevacizumab injections for the treatment of macular oedema caused by non‐ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods: The study included 25 patients (25 eyes) with macular oedema caused by non‐ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion, who received three intravitreal injections of 1.5 mg bevacizumab with an interval of 6 weeks between the injections. Mean duration of central retinal vein occlusion prior to the first injection was 4.2 ± 3.6 days. All patients were re‐examined 1, 3 and 6 months after the first injection. The main outcome parameters were visual acuity and macular thickness, as measured by optical coherence tomography. Results: Mean visual acuity improved significantly from 0.97 ± 0.40 logMAR at baseline to 0.70 ± 0.42 logMAR (P = 0.007) at 1 month, 0.69 ± 0.46 (P = 0.006) 3 months and 0.69 ± 0.52 (P = 0.015) 6 months after the first injection. Mean central retinal thickness decreased significantly from 530 ± 152 μm at baseline to 347 ± 127 μm (P < 0.001) at 1 month, 370 ± 165 μm (P < 0.001) 3 months and 346 ± 129 μm (P < 0.001) 6 months (P < 0.001) after the first injection. The increase in visual acuity correlated significantly (P < 0.01) with the decrease in macular thickness. Mean intraocular pressure was 14.2 ± 3.2 mmHg at baseline and did not differ significantly from the measurement obtained at 1 month (P = 0.59), 3 months (P = 0.88) and 6 months after the first injection (P = 0.65). Conclusion: Intravitreal bevacizumab injections given shortly after onset of non‐ischaemic central retinal vein occlusion may result in a significant increase in vision and a corresponding decrease in macular oedema.     

A comparative study between intravitreal triamcinolone and bevacizumab for macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion with poor vision

Aim:

To compare the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and triamcinolone in patients with macular edema after central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), presenting with poor visual acuity.

Materials and Methods:

It was a retrospective, comparative case series of 38 consecutive eyes, with macular edema secondary to CRVO, with 20/200 or worse vision, which were treated primarily either with intravitreal bevacizumab (1.25 mg; 24 eyes) or intravitreal triamcinolone (4 mg; 14 eyes). During follow-up, 3.6 ± 0.8 re-injections of bevacizumab and 2.4 ± 0.5 re-injections of triamcinolone were administered (P = 0.080). The main outcome measures were the best-corrected visual acuity and the central macular thickness by optical coherence tomography during 12 months of follow-up.

Results:

At 12 months, visual acuity (logMAR) was changed from 1.03 ± 0.39 (baseline) to 0.92 ± 0.39 (P = 0.374) and the central macular thickness was reduced from a baseline of 713.6 ± 179.3 µm to 310.8 ± 205.2 µm (P = 0.000). Neither the bevacizumab nor triamcinolone groups varied significantly in visual acuity and central macular thickness at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment. Neovascular glaucoma developed in two of the 14 eyes (14%) in the triamcinolone group.

Conclusion:

In patients with CRVO and poor vision, intravitreal bevacizumab and intravitreal triamcinolone were associated with a reduction in macular edema; however, neither treatment achieved significant visual acuity improvement by the 12-month follow-up.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment of macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: a short-term study

PURPOSE: To report the short term anatomic and visual acuity response after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab (Avastin, Genentech) in patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study of patients with macular edema due to CRVO who were treated with at least one intravitreal injection of bevacizumab 1.25 mg in 0.05 mL. Patients underwent Snellen visual acuity testing, optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, and ophthalmoscopic examination at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: There were 16 eyes of 15 consecutive patients with a mean age of 76.1 years (SD 9.8 years). Intravitreal triamcinolone had been previously administered to 9 patients, but all of these patients either had no improvement or had excessive intraocular pressure caused by the triamcinolone. The patients received a mean of 2.8 injections of bevacizumab per eye. No adverse events were observed, including endophthalmitis, clinically evident inflammation, increased intraocular pressure, retinal tears, retinal detachment, or thromboembolic events in any patient. The mean central macular thickness at baseline was 887 microm and decreased to a mean of 372 microm at month 1 (P < 0.001). The mean baseline acuity was 20/600 (logMAR = 1.48) and the mean acuity at month 1 was 20/200 (logMAR = 1.05), a difference that was highly significant (P = 0.001). At last follow-up, a mean of 3 months after the first injection, the mean visual acuity was 20/138 (logMAR = 0.84), which was significantly better than baseline (P < 0.001). Visual acuity improvement, defined as a halving of the visual angle, was seen in 14 of the 16 eyes. CONCLUSION: Initial treatment results of patients with macular edema secondary to CRVO did not reveal any short-term safety concerns. Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in a significant decrease in macular edema and improvement in visual acuity. The number of patients in this pilot study was limited and the follow-up is too short to make any specific treatment recommendations, but the favorable short-term results suggest further study is needed.     

Outcomes of combination therapy with dexamethasone implant and bevacizumab in macular edema related to vascular occlusions

AimTo evaluate the anatomical and visual outcomes as well as the safety of combination therapy with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (0.7 mg) and bevacizumab in macular edema secondary to vascular occlusions.MethodsIn this interventional, prospective case series all patients received dexamethasone implant and bevacizumab in a single sitting. Patients diagnosed with retinal venous occlusion were monitored for changes in visual acuity and macular thickness. All patients underwent detailed ocular examination, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and optical coherence tomography examination at baseline and at Week 1, Month 1, and monthly thereafter for 6 months.ResultsTwenty four eyes of 24 treatment-naïve patients (central retinal venous occlusion, n = 9; branch retinal venous occlusion, n = 15) were identified. BCVA improved in 23 patients (95.83%) during the study period. Mean BCVA gained was 0.313 ± 0.26 (85.3% of final gain) and 0.367 ± 0.34 at Week 1 and Month 6, respectively. The percentage of patients who gained ≥2 lines were 52% at Week 1 and 68% at Month 6. The mean macular thickness reduced by 350.9 μm at Week 1 and the maximum treatment effect was seen at Month 2 (379.1 μm). Recurrence of macular edema was seen in 37.5% (9/24) of the eyes. Reinjection was needed, on average, at approximately 3.7 months from the first injection.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the combination therapy of bevacizumab and dexamethasone implant given simultaneously is safe and synergistic resulting in significantly early and sustained visual recovery and decreased macular edema in patients having retinal vein occlusions.     

Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment of macular edema in central retinal vein occlusion: one-year results

Purpose To report on the anatomic and visual acuity response after intravitreal bevacizumab injection in patients with macular edema due to non-ischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). Methods In a retrospective study, 21 consecutive patients (21 eyes) with non-ischemic CRVO underwent, on average, 3.7 intravitreal bevacizumab injections (1.25 mg). Ophthalmic examination included best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) at baseline and follow-up visits. Fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and at follow-up visits if needed. Primary outcomes were change of BCVA and CRT. Results The follow-up period for all of the included patients was 12 months. The mean BCVA was unchanged at the 12-month examination (baseline: 20/160; 12 months: 20/160) (P = 0.771). The mean CRT decreased from 780 μm (standard deviation [SD] ± 324 μm) at the baseline to a mean of 462 μm (SD ± 248 μm) at 12 months (P < 0.05). Conclusion Intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in a significant decrease in CRT without significant improvement of visual acuity in patients with non-ischemic CRVO after a follow-up of 12 months.     

Predictive factors for functional improvement after intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion

Background  

To identify predictive factors for improvement of visual acuity and central retinal thickness by intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).     

Bevacizumab zur Therapie des Makulaödems infolge venöser retinaler Gefäßverschlüsse

BACKGROUND: Retinal vein occlusion often leads to macular edema as a result of an elevated level of intravitreal VEGF. We report on the anatomic and functional results after intravitreal bevacizumab injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: In a prospective study, 18 patients with central, and 22 patients with branch retinal vein occlusion, all of whom had persistent macular edema (>300 microm) received 2.5 mg intravitreal bevacizumab. ETDRS visual acuity, ophthalmic examination and stratus OCT were performed at baseline, 1 week after injection and then monthly. Further injections were given every 6 weeks in patients with persistent or recurring macular edema.RESULTS: The findings did not deteriorate in any of the 40 patients. The injections (mean of 2.6+/-1.4 injections/patient) were very well tolerated in all cases during a mean follow-up of 23+/-13 weeks. On the last visit, 73.3% of patients with central retinal vein occlusion and 76.5% of those with branch retinal vein occlusion were found to have significantly improved visual acuity (by at least 3 lines). Mean central retinal thickness had decreased from 921+/-264 to 239+/-66.2 microm in patients with central retinal vein occlusion, and from 678+/-221 to 236+/-78 microm in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.CONCLUSIONS: Neither intraocular nor systemic side-effects were observed in this study after repeated intravitreal injections of 2.5 mg bevacizumab. Current results suggest that intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is a promising option in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.     

Prospective evaluation of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection in macular edema associated with retinal vascular disorders

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide on visual acuity and macular thickness using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in macular edema associated with various retinal vascular disorders. METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized clinical interventional study included 81 eyes (76 patients) comprised of Group I, 57 eyes (51 patients) with diabetic macular edema; Group II, 10 eyes (10 patients) with branch retinal vein occlusion; and Group III, 13 eyes (13 patients) with central retinal vein occlusion. All eyes received an intravitreal injection of 4 mg triamcinolone acetonide (with the solvent) in the operation theater under sterile conditions. RESULTS: Mean preinjection central macular thickness was 531.84+/-132 microm in Group I, 458.4+/-149 microm in Group II, and 750.81+/-148 microm in Group III. All groups showed a statistically significant decrease in mean central macular thickness at 1 month (300.7+/-119 microm in Group I, 218.2+/-99 microm in Group II, and 210.5 +/-56 microm in Group III) and 3 months (253.19+/-109 microm in Group I, 187+/-47 microm in Group II, and 182+/-50 microm in Group III) after injection (p < 0.05). Mean follow-up was 22+/-2.4 weeks. Mean visual acuity increased in all three groups (preoperative visual acuity in Group I, 1.2+/-0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 1.24+/-0.5 logMAR units; Group III, 1.1+/-0.4 logMAR units; 1 month postinjection in Group I, 0.88+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group II, 0.67+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.86+/-0.4 logMAR units; 3 months postinjection in Group I, 0.84+/-0.4 logMAR units; Group II, 0.59+/-0.3 logMAR units; Group III, 0.82+/-0.5 logMAR units) (p < 0.05). Forty-one eyes completed 6 months and 20 eyes completed 9 months follow-up. Twelve of 20 (41%) eyes in Group I, 2/6 (33%) eyes in Group II, 3/6 (50%) eyes in Group III, and 8/15 (53%) eyes in Group I, 1/3 (33%) eyes in Group II, and 2/2 (100%) eyes in Group III developed recurrence of macular edema with worsening of visual acuity at 6 and 9 months, respectively. Thirty-three (40.7%) eyes developed IOP elevation (at least one reading > 24 mmHg). One eye developed infective endophthalmitis. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide may be considered as an effective treatment for reducing macular thickening due to diffuse diabetic macular edema, venous occlusion associated macular edema, and may result in increase in visual acuity at least in the short term. Further follow-up and analysis is required to demonstrate its long-term efficacy.     

Treatment of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion induced Macular Edema with Bevacizumab

Background

Branch retinal vein occlusion is a frequent cause of visual loss with currently insufficient treatment options. We evaluate the effect of Bevacizumab (Avastin^®) treatment in patients with macular edema induced by branch retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 32 eyes in 32 patients with fluorescein angiography proven branch retinal vein occlusion, macular edema and Bevacizumab treatment. Outcome measures were best corrected visual acuity in logMAR and central retinal thickness in OCT.

Results

Visual acuity was significantly better 4 to 6 weeks after Bevacizumab treatment compared to visual acuity prior to treatment (before 0.7 ± 0.3 and after 0.5 ± 0.3; mean ± standard deviation; p < 0.01, paired t-test). Gain in visual acuity was accompanied by a significant decrease in retinal thickness (454 ± 117 to 305 ± 129 μm, p < 0.01, paired t-test). Follow up (170, 27 – 418 days; median, range) shows that improvement for both visual acuity and retinal thickness last for several months after Bevacizumab use.

Conclusion

We present evidence that intravitreal Bevacizumab is an effective and lasting treatment for macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion.

     

Two-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema

Purpose To investigate 2-year results of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema unresponsive to previous laser photocoagulation. Method The study included 75 eyes of 75 diabetic patients with clinically significant diffuse macular edema that had failed to respond to previous laser photocoagulation. An intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide at the dose of 4 mg/0.1 ml was administered. Best-corrected visual acuity was measured as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and central macular thickness was obtained by optical coherence tomography at each visit. Intraocular pressure and lenticular status were also evaluated. Differences among measurements were evaluated by Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks. Mean follow-up period was 24.7 ± 5.9 months. Results The mean central macular thickness, which was obtained 3 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 18 months and 24 months postoperatively, was significantly different from the baseline measurement (P < 0.001). Mean best-corrected logMAR visual acuity improved significantly from baseline at the 1- month and 3-month follow-up intervals (P < 0.05), but there was no significant change at the 6- month, 9-month, 12-month, 18-month or 24-month follow-up periods (P > 0.05). During the follow-up, 29 (38.7%) eyes received re-injection of intravitreal triamcinolone. Twenty-one (28%) eyes developed intraocular pressure values higher than 21 mmHg, and 18 (24%) eyes developed cataract. Thirteen (17.3%) eyes required cataract and/or glaucoma surgery. Conclusions In refractory diabetic macular edema, intravitreal triamcinolone effectively reduces foveal thickness and improves visual acuity in the short term, but with the extended follow-up, the number of recurrences and steroid-related complications were shown to increase. Nevertheless, it may be a therapeutic option in some patients that do not respond to previous laser photocoagulation.     

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus combined intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone in diffuse diabetic macular oedema

Background: To compare the efficacy of a single injection of combined intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab (Avastin) with that of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with diffuse cystoid diabetic macular oedema. Design: Prospective, non‐randomized, masked, interventional case series. Participants: Twenty‐four eyes of 24 subjects with centre‐involved diabetic macular oedema extending over two disc‐areas with predominant cystic changes on spectral domain optical coherence tomography were selected. Methods: Ten phakic and two pseudophakic, ocular hypertensive eyes received intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab as against 12 pseudophakic, normotensive eyes that received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide. Main Outcome Measures: Change in central macular volume on spectral domain optical coherence tomography and best‐corrected visual acuity were measured at 6‐week follow‐up. Results: Baseline data were matched in both groups. Post‐injection central macular volume (7.46 ± 0.73 mm³) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide group when compared with its pre‐injection central macular volume (9.11 ± 1.0 mm³) or when compared with the post‐injection central macular volume (P = 0.02) of the intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab group (8.42 ± 1.18 mm³). However, post‐injection best‐corrected visual acuity between the intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (0.65 ± 0.15 logMAR) and the intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab groups (0.685 ± 0.15 logMAR) was not significantly different (P = 0.06) at 6 weeks. No significant correlation was noted between change in central macular volume and change in best‐corrected visual acuity (r = 0.35, P = 0.07) from the pooled data of both the groups. A fair correlation was noted between change in central macular volume and pre‐injection central macular volume (r = 0.55, P = 0.005). Conclusions: Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide may be more effective than intravitreal dexamethasone and bevacizumab in reducing macular volume in patients with diffuse cystoid diabetic macular oedema. A significant reduction in macular volume does not necessarily translate into a correspondingly significant improvement in best‐corrected visual acuity.     

Early bevacizumab treatment of central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the change in visual acuity and retinal appearance in patients after early initiation of intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Patients with CRVO of fewer than three months' duration receiving intravitreal bevacizumab as primary treatment were evaluated. Patients received an intravitreal 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) bevacizumab injection. Changes in visual acuity, central macular thickness, venous tortuosity and diameter, and optic disk edema were noted. RESULTS: Six eyes of five consecutive patients with CRVO treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injection were reviewed retrospectively. The patients did not have other ocular conditions that could have compromised visual acuity. The mean baseline visual acuity was 20/428 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units, 1.33). The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range, seven to 15 months), and the number of bevacizumab injections ranged from four to 10. The patients showed a statistically significant decrease in optic nerve head swelling, venous tortuosity, and venous diameter, with the largest proportion of change occurring within one month of the first bevacizumab injection. The mean visual acuity at last follow-up was 20/53 (logMAR units, 0.42; P = .035, as compared with baseline). In no patient did collateral vessels at the optic nerve head develop. CONCLUSIONS: The patients experienced a dramatic improvement in the visual acuity and clinical fundus appearance, without collateral vessel formation. These findings are difficult to explain with current theories of the pathophysiologic features of CRVO. These findings also suggest early initiation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment should be studied in a larger trial for CRVO.     

Clinical,anatomical, and electrophysiological assessments of the central retina following intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term visual, anatomical and electrophysiological outcomes of repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and investigate any possible toxic effects on the central fovea. This is a prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. Thirty-three eyes of 33 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO were treated with 1.25 mg/0.05 ml intravitreal bevacizumab. Nine patients had nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and 24 patients had branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness (CRT), and multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) responses changes at baseline, 1 month after the third injection and at the end of the 2-year long follow-up period. Patients with CRVO had mean best-corrected Snellen visual acuity of 0.10 at baseline, which improved significantly to 0.31 after 2 years (P = 0. 028).The mean CRT at presentation was 756.28 μm and reduced significantly to 439.14 μm after 2 years (P = 0.05). Patients with BRVO had mean best-corrected Snellen visual acuity of 0.19 at baseline, which improved significantly to 0.40 after 2 years (P < 0.001). The mean CRT at presentation was 681.04 μm and reduced significantly to 369.81 μm after 2 years (P < 0.001). Mean mfERG responses within central 10° (ring1, ring2) showed statistically significant differences on P1 parameters in terms of response density and implicit time after 2 years in both CRVO and BRVO patients. Repeated intravitreal bevacizumab injections for macular edema due to either CRVO or BRVO resulted in long-term improvement of visual acuity, a reduction in CRT and statistically significant changes in the mfERG responses with nondemonstrable toxic effects on the central fovea.     

多波长激光治疗DR合并视网膜中央静脉阻塞

目的：观察多波长激光治疗糖尿病视网膜病变（ diabetic retinopathy,DR）合并视网膜中央静脉阻塞（ central retinal vein occlusion, CRVO）的疗效。 方法：选取DR合并CRVO患者95例100眼,采用多波长激光进行光凝治疗。其中黄斑区以氪黄激光治疗为主,包括局部光凝和格栅光凝,周边光凝以氪绿或氪红激光进行治疗。手术前后均进行视力、眼底、荧光素眼底血管造影检查。术后随访12~48 wk。观察比较两组光凝前后视力及黄斑水肿变化,并做统计学分析。 结果：在黄斑格栅光凝组,有效率为61.2%,在黄斑局部光凝组,有效率为86.3%,后者总有效率高于前者,有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。 结论：多波长激光治疗DR合并CRVO患者的黄斑水肿安全、有效。     

玻璃体腔注射贝伐单抗治疗PDR黄斑水肿后患者的满意度和视力(英文)

目的:增生性糖尿病性视网膜病播散性视网膜激光光凝后,用非选择性抗VEGF抑制剂贝伐单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿,调查患者自我评估的视功能及视力。方法:30例30眼增生性糖尿病性视网膜病伴持续性糖尿病性黄斑水肿连续病例,播散性视网膜激光光凝后,1.25mg贝伐单抗0.05mL (Avastin)单剂量玻璃体腔注射治疗。对照组包括30例30眼增生性糖尿病性视网膜病,只接受播散性视网膜激光光凝。主要的调查结果包括Snellen视力,眼底临床检查和患者自我用0-100分数值范围评价的视觉质量。结果:贝伐单抗组的平均基线视力为0.48±0.58 logMAR,对照组为0.61±0.78 (两组无显著差异)。6mo后,视力没有显著的变化,贝伐单抗组和对照组分别为0.33±0.41和0.52±0.68。临床检查显示黄斑水肿仅有一些改善趋势。患者用直观模拟标度尺主观评价视功能结果显示注射贝伐单抗6mo后由60.2±17.5改善至76.0±15.6 (P<0.001)。对照组自我评估视功能平均值为59.6±19.8,与贝伐单抗组基线值无显著差异,但是低于注射贝伐单抗后分数,差异有高度显著性(P<0.01)。结论:治疗增生性糖尿病性视网膜病的黄斑水肿,贝伐单抗(Avastin)玻璃体腔注射作为播散性激光光凝的辅助治疗较单纯的激光治疗后患者满意度和自我评价的视力显著改善。患者视力在6mo后无明显变化。     

Intravitreal Combination of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Bevacizumab (Kenacort-Avastin) in Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal injection of the combination of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Bevacizumab in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Materials and Methods: Twenty seven eyes of 17 patients with diabetic macular edema were treated with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide (2?mg) combined with bevacizumab (1.25?mg).

Results: During the 6 months follow-up period 24 eyes (89%) had to repeat the treatment according to the monthly follow-up examination.The mean visual acuity and the central macular thickness improved significantly (P<0.05) throughout the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Intravitreal combination of Triamcinolone Acetonide and Bevacizumab seems to be effective in improving visual acuity and macular edema in patients with diabetic maculopathy.     

The correlation between optical coherence tomographic features and severity of retinopathy,macular thickness and visual acuity in diabetic macular edema

Purpose To investigate the correlation between the features of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and the severity of concurrent retinopathy, central macular thickness (CMT), and best-corrected visual acuity in clinically significant diabetic macular edema.Methods In a prospective study, OCT was performed in 55 eyes of 55 patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema, in 58 eyes of 30 patients with diabetes without retinopathy, and in 40 eyes of 21 healthy control subjects. The OCT features were categorized into: type 1, sponge-like retinal swelling; type 2, cystoid macular edema; type 3, serous retinal detachment; and type 4, vitreofoveal traction.Results The CMT in eyes with diabetic macular edema was significantly higher than in eyes of healthy controls or in eyes of diabetic patients without retinopathy (P < 0.001). Visual acuity correlated with CMT in diabetic macular edema (r = 0.558, P < 0.001). The prevalence of OCT type 1 was significantly higher in eyes with mild-to-moderate non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR) than in eyes with severe NPDR to proliferative retinopathy (PDR) (P = 0.0069). The prevalence of OCT types 3 and 4 was significantly higher in eyes with severe NPDR to PDR than in eyes with mild-to-moderate NPDR (P = 0.0056). OCT type 1 showed the least CMT (P < 0.001) and the best visual acuity (P = 0.002).Conclusions There was a significant correlation between OCT patterns of clinically significant diabetic macular edema and severity of retinopathy, CMT, and visual acuity.     

Prognostic factors for visual outcome after intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors for visual outcome after intravitreal bevacizumab injection to treat macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). METHODS: Fifty eyes of 50 consecutive patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema due to BRVO with minimum follow-up of 3 months were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the final visual acuity. Group 1 consisted of eyes with 5 or more ETDRS letters gain, and group 2 consisted of eyes with less than 5 letters improvement or which had worsened at last follow-up visit. Comparative clinical and fluorescein angiographic characteristics were analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS: Of 50 eyes, 28 (56%) had improved vision after intravitreal bevacizumab injections and were categorized as group 1; 22 eyes (44%) were categorized as group 2. The number of early VA gainers, who showed visual improvement at 1 month after bevacizumab injection, was significantly higher in group 1 (P < 0.001, chi-square test). The early gainers tend to maintain significantly better visual outcome until last follow-up. The number of eyes with angiographically documented macular ischemia was significantly higher in group 2 (P < 0.001). In group 2, the decrease in central macular thickness was not accompanied by visual acuity improvement. CONCLUSION: Preoperative presence of macular ischemia can be useful in predicting the outcome of visual acuity after intravitreal bevacizumab for macular edema due to BRVO. The early gainers who favorably responded to the initial intravitreal bevacizumab injection are most likely to benefit from the bevacizumab treatment.     

Intravitreous injection of bevacizumab for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy

Background/PurposeTo evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab on subretinal fluid absorption in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR).Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective case series study. Patients with CSCR symptoms for > 3 months and who received intravitreal injection of bevacizumab were included. Ocular examinations were carried out at baseline and every follow-up visit, including visual acuity, fundus examination, and optic coherence tomography.ResultsTwelve eyes in 12 patients were included in this study. One month after injection, three of the 12 patients who had increased central macular thickness were considered nonresponders. Nine of the 12 patients who had decreased central macular thickness were considered to have responded to intravitreal bevacizumab injection. The response rate was 75%. In the response group, the mean central macular thickness significantly decreased, from 306.7 ± 77.8 μm to 204.3 ± 59.3 μm (p = 0.001) at 1 month. The mean Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity was significantly improved from 0.72 ± 0.35 to 0.50 ± 0.28 (p = 0.008). Six of these nine patients had stable conditions lasting > 6 months. Three of them had recurrence.ConclusionIntravitreal bevacizumab injections improved subretinal fluid absorption in some patients with CSCR. It could be an alternative therapy for patients with CSCR, especially when they are not suitable for other treatments.