Obesity and inpatient rehabilitation outcomes for patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury

Stenson KW, Deutsch A, Heinemann AW, Chen D. Obesity and inpatient rehabilitation outcomes for patients with a traumatic spinal cord injury.

Objective

To examine the effect of obesity on change in FIM self-care and mobility ratings and community discharge for patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design

Retrospective cohort study analyzing National Model Systems SCI Database data.

Setting

Fourteen Model Systems SCI programs.

Participants

Patients (N=1524) with a new traumatic SCI discharged from Model Systems rehabilitation centers between October 2006 and October 2009.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Change in FIM self-care and mobility ratings, discharge destination. Separate analyses were conducted by neurologic category: paraplegia incomplete, paraplegia complete, tetraplegia incomplete, and tetraplegia complete.

Results

Of all patients with traumatic SCI, approximately 25% were obese at admission. Patients who were obese were more likely to be married and slightly older than nonobese patients. In patients with paraplegia incomplete, obese patients had lower FIM self-care (−1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.4 to −.4) and mobility score gains (−1.5; 95% CI, −2.9 to −.1) than normal-weight patients. For patients with paraplegia complete, obese patients had significantly lower self-care (−2.2; 95% CI, −3.5 to −.8) and mobility score gains (−2.7; 95% CI, −3.9 to −1.5). For patients with tetraplegia incomplete and tetraplegia complete, FIM self-care and mobility ratings for obese patients were not significantly different from ratings for normal-weight patients. Within each neurologic category, the percentage of patients discharged to the community was not significantly different for nonobese and obese patients.

Conclusions

Obesity appears to be a barrier to meeting self-care and mobility functional goals for patients with paraplegia in inpatient SCI rehabilitation.     

The impact of sacral sensory sparing in motor complete spinal cord injury

Kirshblum S, Botticello A, Lammertse DP, Marino RJ, Chiodo AE, Jha A. The impact of sacral sensory sparing in motor complete spinal cord injury.

Objective

To determine the effect of sensory sparing in motor complete persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) on completion of rehabilitation on neurologic, functional, and social outcomes reported at 1 year.

Design

Secondary analysis of longitudinal data collected by using prospective survey-based methods.

Setting

Data submitted to the National SCI Statistical Center Database.

Participants

Of persons (N=4106) enrolled in the model system with a motor complete injury (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS] grade A or B) at the time of discharge between 1997 and 2007, a total of 2331 (56.8%) completed a 1-year follow-up interview (Form II) and 1284 (31.3%) had complete data for neurologic (eg, AIS grade, injury level) variables at 1 year.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

AIS grade (A vs B) at 1 year, bladder management, hospitalizations, perceived health status, motor FIM items, Satisfaction With Life Scale, depressive symptoms, and social participation.

Results

Compared with persons with AIS grade A at discharge, persons with AIS grade B were less likely to require indwelling catheterization and be hospitalized and more likely to perceive better health, report greater functional independence (ie, self-care, sphincter control, mobility, locomotion), and report social participation in the first year postinjury. A greater portion of individuals with AIS grade B at discharge had improved neurologic recovery at 1 year postinjury than those with AIS grade A. Significant AIS group differences in 1-year outcomes related to physical health were maintained after excluding persons who improved to motor incomplete status for only bladder management and change in perceived health status. This recognition of differences between persons with motor complete injuries (AIS grade A vs B) has important ramifications for the field of SCI rehabilitation and research.     

Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes

Haley SM, Gandek B, Siebens H, Black-Schaffer RM, Sinclair SJ, Tao W, Coster WJ, Ni P, Jette AM. Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes.

Objectives

To measure participation outcomes with a computerized adaptive test (CAT) and compare CAT and traditional fixed-length surveys in terms of score agreement, respondent burden, discriminant validity, and responsiveness.

Design

Longitudinal, prospective cohort study of patients interviewed approximately 2 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and 3 months later.

Setting

Follow-up interviews conducted in patient’s home setting.

Participants

Adults (N=94) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Participation domains of mobility, domestic life, and community, social, & civic life, measured using a CAT version of the Participation Measure for Postacute Care (PM-PAC-CAT) and a 53-item fixed-length survey (PM-PAC-53).

Results

The PM-PAC-CAT showed substantial agreement with PM-PAC-53 scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, model 3,1, .71-.81). On average, the PM-PAC-CAT was completed in 42% of the time and with only 48% of the items as compared with the PM-PAC-53. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The PM-PAC-CAT had modest reductions in sensitivity and responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval as compared with the PM-PAC-53.

Conclusions

Although continued evaluation is warranted, accurate estimates of participation status and responsiveness to change for group-level analyses can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a sizeable reduction in respondent burden.     

Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. DESIGN: Longitudinal, prospective 1-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. SETTING: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). RESULTS: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time.     

Predicting walking at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation after a traumatic spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how injury level and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade at rehabilitation admission are related to walking at discharge after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Comprehensive rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 343 adult inpatients with traumatic SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: FIM instrument walking rating of 3 (moderate assistance) or higher at discharge. RESULTS: Significantly more subjects admitted with AIS grade C (28.3%) than AIS grade A or B injuries (0.9%) walked at discharge. Significantly more subjects admitted with AIS grade D (67.2%) than AIS grade C (28.3%) injuries walked at discharge. Level of injury did not significantly affect walking after AIS grade C or D injuries. Being 50 years or older had a significant negative affect on walking in subjects with AIS grade D but not AIS grade C injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Admission AIS grades give information about walking for treatment and discharge planning during acute inpatient rehabilitation, including the following: (1) patients admitted with AIS grade C injuries should not be considered functionally complete when predicting walking (FIM score > or = 3; no more than moderate assistance) at discharge, (2) level of injury does not affect walking for those with AIS grade C or D injuries, and (3) being 50 years or older has a significant negative affect on walking in subjects with AIS grade D but not AIS grade C injuries.     

A new instrument for outcome assessment in rehabilitation medicine: Spinal cord injury ability realization measurement index

OBJECTIVES: To introduce a new measure of disability weighted for the neurologic deficit in patients with spinal cord lesions and to examine the effect on the instrument of being in rehabilitation. DESIGN: Development of instrument and preliminary comparative before-after study. SETTING: Spinal department in a rehabilitation hospital in Israel. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine patients with spinal cord lesions. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were repeatedly assessed during rehabilitation with the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) to measure neurologic motor impairment and with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM-II) to measure disability. Scores of the 2 assessments were combined to create the Spinal Cord Injury Ability Realization Measurement Index (SCI-ARMI). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A preliminary formula for the calculation of SCI-ARMI using the individual patients' SCIM-II and AIS motor scores and changes in SCI-ARMI values through rehabilitation. RESULTS: The highest observed SCIM-II scores at patients' AIS level correlated highly with the AIS motor scores (r=.96, P<.01). A regression performed for this linear relationship resulted in a preliminary SCI-ARMI formula. The calculated SCI-ARMI values improved during rehabilitation irrespective of patient age, gender, lesion level, or lesion severity (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary version of the SCI-ARMI can be used to assess quantitatively changes in functional ability, isolating them from the effect of neurologic changes.     

Functional outcomes and disability after nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: Results from a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE: To describe, in a group of patients undergoing initial inpatient rehabilitation after nontraumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), the demographic characteristics, clinical features, and outcomes, with a focus on the functional status and disability. DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis, 3-year case series. SETTING: Tertiary medical unit specializing in nontraumatic SCI rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 70 adult inpatient referrals with nontraumatic SCI undergoing initial inpatient rehabilitation. INTERVENTION: Chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were demographic characteristics, clinical features, mortality, length of stay (LOS), neurologic classification, accommodation setting, support services, mobility, bladder and bowel continence, and FIM instrument scores. RESULTS: Forty-one patients (58.6%) were paraplegic incomplete, 23 (32.9%) were tetraplegic incomplete, and 6 (8.6%) were paraplegic complete. Eight patients (11.4%) died before hospital discharge. Of those who survived, 47 (75.8%) were discharged home, 11 (17.7%) were transferred to a nursing home, and 4 (6.4%) went elsewhere in the community. The geometric mean LOS was 55.8 days. Nine patients (14.5%) were discharged walking unaided, 27 (43.5%) were walking at least 10 m with a gait aid, and 26 (41.9%) were wheelchair dependent for mobility. Thirty patients (48.4%) were voiding on sensation, 7 (11.1%) used intermittent catheterization, 23 (37.2%) had an indwelling catheter, and 2 (2.8%) used reflex voiding. Eleven patients (17.7%) were fecally continent on sensation and 47 (75.8%) were fecally continent with a bowel program, 1 patient (1.6%) had a colostomy, and 3 patients (4.8%) were discharged fecally incontinent. The mean Rasch FIM motor score was 39.6 on admission and 58.7 at discharge (paired t test, t=-11.2; P<.000). CONCLUSIONS: Most nontraumatic SCI patients returned home with a good level of functioning regarding mobility, bladder, and bowel status, in comparison to other studies of patients with SCI. Patients' disability was usually significantly reduced during rehabilitation.     

Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES: To investigate environmental barriers reported by people with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to determine the relative impact of environmental barriers compared with demographic and injury characteristics and activity limitations in predicting variation in participation and life satisfaction. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, follow-up survey. SETTING: Individuals rehabilitated at 16 federally designated Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems of care, now living in the community. PARTICIPANTS: People with SCI (N=2726) who completed routine follow-up research interviews between 2000 and 2002. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors-Short Form (CHIEF-SF), the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique-Short Form, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale. RESULTS: The top 5 environmental barriers reported by subjects with SCI, in descending order of importance, were the natural environment, transportation, need for help in the home, availability of health care, and governmental policies. The CHIEF-SF subscales accounted for only 4% or less of the variation in participation; they accounted for 10% of the variation in life satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of environmental factors in models of disability was supported, but were found to be more strongly related to life satisfaction than to societal participation.     

The assessment of walking capacity using the walking index for spinal cord injury: self-selected versus maximal levels

OBJECTIVES: To assess (1) the frequency and magnitude of differences between self-selected and maximal walking capacity following spinal cord injury (SCI) by using the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) and (2) how these levels differ in efficiency and velocity. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty people with chronic incomplete SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects ambulated at the level used in the community (self-selected WISCI) and the highest level possible (maximal WISCI). Velocity (in m/s), Physiological Cost Index (PCI), and Total Heart Beat Index (THBI) were calculated. Differences were compared using the paired t test (parametric) or Wilcoxon signed-rank test (nonparametric). RESULTS: For 36 subjects, maximal WISCI was higher than self-selected WISCI; 21 subjects showed an increase of 3 levels or more. Ambulatory velocity was higher for self-selected WISCI compared with maximal WISCI (.68 m/s vs .56 m/s, P<.001). PCI and THBI at self-selected WISCI were lower than at maximal WISCI (PCI, 0.99 beats/m vs 1.48 beats/m, P<.001; THBI, 3.39 beats/m vs 4.75 beats/m, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Many people with chronic SCI are capable of ambulating at multiple levels. For these people, ambulation at self-selected WISCI was more efficient as evidenced by greater velocity and decreased PCI and THBI. The findings have implications for assessing walking capacity within the context of clinical trials.     

A prospective study of health and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury

Krause JS, Carter RE, Pickelsimer EE, Wilson D. A prospective study of health and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury.

Objective

To test hypothesized relationships between multiple health parameters and mortality among persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) while controlling for variations in biographical and injury characteristics.

Design

Prospective cohort study with health data collected in late 1997 and early 1998 and mortality status ascertained in December 2005.

Setting

A large rehabilitation hospital in the Southeastern United States.

Participants

A total of 1389 adults with traumatic SCI, at least 1 year postinjury.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was time from survey to mortality (or time of censoring). Mortality status was determined using the National Death Index and the Social Security Death Index. There were 225 deaths (16.2%) by December 31, 2005.

Results

Cox proportional hazards modeling identified several significant health predictors of mortality status, while controlling for biographic and injury factors. Two sets of analyses were conducted—the first identifying the significance of a single variable of interest and the second analysis building a comprehensive model based on an optimal group of variables. Multiple types of health conditions were associated with mortality. The best set of health predictors included probable major depression, surgeries to repair pressure ulcers, fractures and/or amputations, symptoms of infections, and days hospitalized. Inclusion of these variables, along with a general health rating, improved prediction of survival compared with biographic and injury variables alone, because the pseudo R² increased from .12 to .18 and the concordance from .730 to .776.

Conclusions

In addition to secondary conditions that have been the traditional focus of prevention efforts (eg, pressure ulcers, urinary tract infections), amputations, fractures, and depressive symptoms were associated with higher risk for mortality; however, further research is needed to identify the association of specific conditions with causes of death and to determine whether interventions can modify these conditions and ultimately improve survival.     

Validation of a model for evaluating outcome after traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To validate a model that examines the contribution of premorbid variables, injury severity, and functional and cognitive status to outcome 1 year after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Cross-validation study using a larger, national, prospective, longitudinal sample. SETTING: Acute inpatient rehabilitation hospitals at Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems centers. PARTICIPANTS: Two sample populations followed through acute rehabilitation to 1 year after TBI. The original sample included 107 patients, and the cross-validation sample included 294 patients. Participants were predominantly young men who had experienced moderate to severe TBI in motor vehicle crashes. INTERVENTIONS: Acute medical and rehabilitation care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability Rating Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire, and return to employment. RESULTS: Structural equation modeling was used to compare the fit of the data to a path analysis developed through clinical use and previous research. Both samples provided adequate goodness of fit, supporting the model's validity. Injury severity affected cognitive and functional status, and cognitive and functional status significantly influenced 1-year outcome. Premorbid factors and injury severity did not directly influence outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Both samples supported the proposed model, which was cross-validated. Injury severity indirectly influences outcome through its effects on cognitive and functional status. Although treatment to decrease injury severity is obviously important, concentrated rehabilitation interventions aimed at improving patients' cognitive and functional status may have a more significant impact on 1-year outcome and should be the focus of future research.     

Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive cognitive rehabilitation program (ICRP) compared with standard neurorehabilitation (SRP) for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled intervention trial. SETTING: Community-based, postacute outpatient brain injury rehabilitation program. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six persons with TBI. INTERVENTIONS: Participants in ICRP (n=27) received an intensive, highly structured program of integrated cognitive and psychosocial interventions based on principles of holistic neuropsychologic rehabilitation. Participants in SRP (n=29) received comprehensive neurorehabilitation consisting primarily of physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychologic treatment. Duration of treatment was approximately 4 months for both interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ); and Quality of Community Integration Questionnaire assessing satisfaction with community functioning and satisfaction with cognitive functioning. Neuropsychologic functioning was evaluated for the ICRP participants. RESULTS: Both groups showed significant improvement on the CIQ, with the ICRP group exhibiting a significant treatment effect compared with the SRP group. Analysis of clinically significant improvement indicated that ICRP participants were over twice as likely to show clinical benefit on the CIQ (odds ratio=2.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-7.2). ICRP participants showed significant improvement in overall neuropsychologic functioning; participants with clinically significant improvement on the CIQ also showed greater improvement of neuropsychologic functioning. Satisfaction with community functioning was not related to community integration after treatment. Satisfaction with cognitive functioning made a significant contribution to posttreatment community integration; this finding may reflect the mediating effects of perceived self-efficacy on functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive, holistic, cognitive rehabilitation is an effective form of rehabilitation, particularly for persons with TBI who have previously been unable to resume community functioning. Perceived self-efficacy may have significant impact on functional outcomes after TBI rehabilitation. Measures of social participation and subjective well-being appear to represent distinct and separable rehabilitation outcomes after TBI.     

Depression assessment after traumatic brain injury: an empirically based classification method

OBJECTIVES: To describe the patterns of depression in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory (NFI) Depression Scale, and to classify empirically NFI Depression Scale scores. DESIGN: Depressive symptoms were characterized by using the NFI Depression Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) Depression Scale. SETTING: An outpatient clinic within a Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems center. PARTICIPANTS: A demographically diverse sample of 172 outpatients with TBI, evaluated between 1996 and 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The NFI, BDI, and MMPI-2 Depression Scale. The Cronbach alpha, analysis of variance, Pearson correlations, and canonical discriminant function analysis were used to examine the psychometric properties of the NFI Depression Scale. RESULTS: Patients with TBI most frequently reported problems with frustration (81%), restlessness (73%), rumination (69%), boredom (66%), and sadness (66%) with the NFI Depression Scale. The percentages of patients classified as depressed with the BDI and the NFI Depression Scale were 37% and 30%, respectively. The Cronbach alpha for the NFI Depression Scale was.93, indicating a high degree of internal consistency. As hypothesized, NFI Depression Scale scores correlated highly with BDI (r=.765) and MMPI-2 Depression Scale T scores (r=.752). The NFI Depression Scale did not correlate significantly with the MMPI-2 Hypomania Scale, thus showing discriminant validity. Normal and clinically depressed BDI scores were most likely to be accurately predicted by the NFI Depression Scale, with 81% and 87% of grouped cases, respectively, correctly classified. Normal and depressed MMPI-2 Depression Scale scores were accurately predicted by the NFI Depression Scale, with 75% and 83% of grouped cases correctly classified, respectively. Patients' NFI Depression Scale scores were mapped to the corresponding BDI categories, and 3 NFI score classifications emerged: minimally depressed (13-28), borderline depressed (29-42), and clinically depressed (43-65). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided further evidence that screening for depression should be a standard component of TBI assessment protocols. Between 30% and 38% of patients with TBI were classified as depressed with the NFI Depression Scale and the BDI, respectively. Our findings also provided empirical evidence that the NFI Depression Scale is a useful tool for classifying postinjury depression.     

Neoplastic versus traumatic spinal cord injury: an outcome comparison after inpatient rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients with neoplastic spinal cord compression (SCC) to outcomes of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) after inpatient rehabilitation. DESIGN: A comparison between patients with a diagnosis of neoplastic SCC admitted to an SCI rehabilitation unit and patients with a diagnosis of traumatic SCI admitted to the regional Model Spinal Cord Injury Centers over a 5-year period, controlling for age, neurologic level of injury, and American Spinal Injury Association impairment classification. SETTING: Tertiary university medical centers. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with neoplastic SCC and 29 patients with SCI of traumatic etiology who met standard rehabilitation admission criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute and rehabilitation hospital length of stay (LOS), Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores, FIM change, FIM efficiency, and discharge rates to home. RESULTS: Patients with neoplastic SCC had a significantly (p < .01) shorter rehabilitation LOS than those with traumatic SCI (25.17 vs 57.46 days). No statistical significance was found in acute care LOS. Motor FIM scores on admission were higher in the neoplastic group, but discharge FIM scores and FIM change were significantly lower. Both groups had similar FIM efficiencies and community discharges. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with neoplastic SCC can achieve rates of functional gain comparable to those of their counterparts with traumatic SCI. While patients with traumatic SCI achieve greater functional improvement, patients with neoplastic SCC have a shorter rehabilitation LOS and can achieve comparable success with discharge to the community.     

Time to rehabilitation admission and associated outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injury

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between time from injury to rehabilitation admission and outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: One hundred-bed inpatient rehabilitation facility with a 20-bed brain injury unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TBIs discharged from initial inpatient rehabilitation between 2003 and 2004 (N=158). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes examined were functional independence at discharge (motor, cognitive, total FIM scores), rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), and rehabilitation cost. RESULTS: Significant linear trends were observed for time to admission and motor FIM scores, total FIM scores, rehabilitation LOS, and cost. All linear regression models contained time to admission as a significant predictor of rehabilitation outcomes. Over half of the variability in outcomes was explained by predictors including time to admission and case-mix group or individual FIM scores with the exception of discharge motor FIM score, for which only 45% of the variability was explained. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who progress to rehabilitation earlier do better functionally and have lower costs and shorter LOSs. Furthermore, the time to rehabilitation admission is easily calculated and could be used by rehabilitation providers in adjunct with admission FIM scores to estimate resource utilization.     

The impact of female reproductive function on outcomes after traumatic brain injury

Ripley DL, Harrison-Felix C, Sendroy-Terrill M, Cusick CP, Dannels-McClure A, Morey C. The impact of female reproductive function on outcomes after traumatic brain injury.

Objectives

To determine the impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on female menstrual and reproductive functioning and to examine the relationships between severity of injury, duration of amenorrhea, and TBI outcomes.

Design

Retrospective cohort survey.

Setting

Telephone interview.

Participants

Women (N=30; age range, 18-45y), between 1 and 3 years postinjury, who had completed inpatient rehabilitation for TBI.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Data collected included menstrual and reproductive functioning pre- and postinjury, demographic, and injury characteristics. Outcome measures included the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E), the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4), and the Medical Outcome Study 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey, Version 2 (SF-12v2).

Results

The median duration of amenorrhea was 61 days (range, 20-344d). Many subjects' menstrual function changed after TBI, reporting a significant increase in skipped menses postinjury (P<.001) and a trend toward more painful menses (P=.061). More severe TBI, as measured by the duration of posttraumatic amnesia, was significantly predictive of a longer duration of amenorrhea (P=.004). Subjects with a shorter duration of amenorrhea scored significantly better on the SF-12 physical component subscale (P=.004), the GOS-E (P=.05), and the MPAI-4 participation subscale (P=.05) after controlling for age, injury severity, and time postinjury.

Conclusions

The severity of TBI was predictive of duration of amenorrhea and a shorter duration of amenorrhea was predictive of better ratings of global outcome, community participation, and health-related quality of life postinjury.     

Reliability of the clinical outcome variables scale when administered via telephone to assess mobility in people with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE: To examine the equivalence reliability and test-retest reliability of the Clinical Outcome Variables Scale (COVS) when administered via telephone (TCOVS) to people with spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Equivalence (telephone administration vs in-person) and test-retest reliability study. SETTING: Assessments conducted in participants' home environment. PARTICIPANTS: Equivalence reliability was examined in a convenience sample of 37 people with a diagnosis of traumatic SCI who had been discharged from the Queensland Spinal Injuries Unit to the community. In a separate group of participants, test-retest reliability of COVS when administered via telephone was examined in 43 people with SCI who were randomly selected from the Queensland Spinal Cord Injuries Service records. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability was assessed at the subscale and composite score level using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC(2,1)) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. RESULTS: Reliability was good for TCOVS and COVS for the composite score (ICC=.98), mobility subscale (ICC=.97), and ambulation subscale (ICC=.99). Reliability was also good for TCOVS test and retest assessments for the composite score (ICC=1), mobility subscale (ICC=1), and ambulation subscale (ICC=1). For all comparisons, most data points were within the 95% limits of agreement and the width of limits of agreement were considered to be clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings confirm the equivalence and test-retest reliability of the TCOVS in an SCI population when administered by trained raters.     

Rehabilitation needs of an inpatient medical oncology unit

OBJECTIVE: To identify prospectively functional impairments and rehabilitation needs in an acute care medical oncology unit. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Inpatient medical oncology unit at a Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five patients admitted over a 6-month period. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: FIM instrument, functionally based physical examination, Rehabilitation Needs Assessment, and Recreational Needs Assessment. RESULTS: On admission, the mean FIM total score was 105 out of 126, the FIM motor score was 72 out of 91, and the FIM cognitive score was 34 out of 35. The functionally based physical examination did not generally correlate with scores obtained on the FIM. Forty-eight (87%) patients had rehabilitation needs on admission. Forty-six (84%) patients had rehabilitation needs on discharge. Rehabilitation Needs Assessment on admission showed deconditioning in 42 (76%) patients; mobility impairment in 32 (58%) patients; a significant decrease in range of motion in 23 (42%) patients; deficits in activities of daily living in 12 (22%) patients; a need for recreational therapy in 7 (13%) patients; potential for benefit from patient education in 30 (55%) patients; and a need for modalities, edema control, or wound care in fever than 5% of patients. The most commonly requested recreational activity was reading. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to inpatient medical oncology units have many unmet, remediable rehabilitation needs that may not be recognized by nonrehabilitation physicians and other clinical staff. These findings suggest that assessment of medical oncology patients may be enhanced by consultation with rehabilitation medicine specialists.