Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.     

Stability of the hard and soft tissue profile after mandibular advancement in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study

The aim of the study was to conduct a long-term follow-up investigation of the stability of hard and soft tissues after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal (RIF) fixation to advance the mandible. Sixteen consecutive patients (12 females and 4 males, mean age 21.4 years) were available for re-examination 12.7 years (T5) after surgery. The preceding follow-ups were before (T1), and 5 days (T2), 7.3 months (T3), and 13.9 months (T4) after surgery. Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, and evaluated with the Dentofacial Planner program. The x-axis for the system of co-ordinates ran through sella (point zero) and the line NSL -7 degrees. Thus, the program determined the x- and y-values of each variable and the usual angles and distances. Statistical analysis was carried out using Wilcoxon's matched-pair signed-ranks test with Bonferroni adjustments. The relationships between the examined variables were analysed by Spearman rank correlation coefficients. The backward relapse at point B (T5) was 2.42 mm, or 50 per cent, and at pogonion 3.21 mm, or 60 per cent of the initial advancement. The mean net effect at T5 on the labial fold (soft tissue point B) was 94 per cent of the advancement at point B. For the soft tissue chin (soft tissue pogonion), it was 119 per cent of the advancement at pogonion. The net effect on the lower lip (labrale inferior) was 55 per cent of the advancement at incision inferior. The amount of the surgical advancement of the mandible was correlated with the long-term relapse in point B. Among possible reasons for this relapse are the initial soft tissue profile, the initial growth direction, and the remodelling processes of the hard tissue.     

Stability after rigid fixation of simultaneous maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement osteotomies

The purpose of this study was to investigate the short- and long-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following LeFort I (LF-1) impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) and mandibular advancement using the technique of rigid internal fixation (RIF). In order to assess the postoperative maxillary and mandibular movement pattern in 26 patients with vertical maxillary excess and mandibular deficiency, cephalograms were taken immediately preoperatively, and 1 week, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery. With paired t-test showing no statistically significant postoperative change for the point A of the maxilla from immediate postsurgery to longest follow-up (P> 0.05), the used technique of "RIF LF-I impaction and RIF BSSO advancement" tended to render excellent postsurgical stability in the horizontal (0.1+/-0.8mm mean posterior movement) and vertical (0.1+/-0.5mm mean inferior movement) direction. There was no instance of maxillary relapse of >2mm. Regarding mandibular BSSO advancement, the point B showed a significant vertical upward movement (1.6+/-1.2mm) (P< 0.001) and a slight horizontal forward movement (0.3+/-2.0mm) (P> 0.05) at 1-year follow-up. The incidence of posterior relapse of >2mm accounted for 11.5%. The data confirm the concept that the bimaxillary approach of "LF-I impaction and BSSO advancement" using the described technique of RIF is a stable procedure in the treatment of open bite patients classified as vertical maxillary excess in combination with mandibular deficiency.     

Stability of extraoral vertical ramus osteotomy: plate fixation versus maxillomandibular/skeletal suspension wire fixation

The objective of this cephalometric study was to evaluate skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes in 2 groups of mandibular prognathism patients following extraoral oblique vertical ramus osteotomy (VRO). One group (n = 22) received maxillomandibular fixation and skeletal suspension wires (MMF group) for a period of 8 weeks. In the other group (n = 22), the segments were rigidly fixed with plates and the patients were allowed to function immediately after surgery. Lateral cephalograms were taken on 5 occasions: immediately presurgical, immediately postsurgical, 8 weeks postsurgical, 6 months postsurgical, and 1 year postsurgical. During the first 8 weeks after surgery, the MMF group demonstrated posterior movement of the mandible, with an increase in mandibular plane angle, shortening of the rami, and dental compensations. Upon release of MMF and skeletal suspension wiring, a small anterior relapse tendency was observed, but the net setback 1 year after surgery was still greater than the actual surgical setback. In the plate fixation group, postoperative changes were mainly in the form of a small anterior relapse tendency in the range of 10% of the surgical setback. The results indicate that the use of plate fixation with VRO, while eliminating the inconvenience for the patient of several weeks of MMF and preventing the early side effects observed in the MMF group, also resulted in a more predictable surgical procedure, with excellent stability 1 year after surgery.     

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: long-term results.

PURPOSE: To identify the long-term maxillomandibular changes after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism using bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent BSSO to setback the mandible and had cephalometric radiographs taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 6 weeks, 1 year, and long-term follow-up (mean, 28 months). The cephalograms were traced and measured to determine the operative and postoperative changes. Correlation analyses were performed to see the relationship between the magnitude of setback and the amount of long-term postsurgical change at B point and pogonion. RESULTS: The mean surgical setback was 8.2 mm at B point and 8.8 mm at pogonion. The mean long-term horizontal relapse was 2.3 mm (28.0%) at B point and 3.0 mm (34.1%) at pogonion. Out of 20 patients, 12 (60.0%) relapsed horizontally greater than 2 mm at B point and 13 (65.0%) at pogonion. The mean vertical surgical changes showed downward displacement of B point (2.3 mm) and pogonion (2.0 mm). The mean long-term vertical relapse was 1.6 mm (69.6%) at B point and 1.7 mm (85.0%) at pogonion. CONCLUSION: There was no correlation between the magnitude of setback and the amount of relapse at B point and pogonion. However, there was significant correlation between the magnitude of vertical, downward surgical displacement and the amount of vertical relapse at B point and pogonion. The majority of the maxillofacial changes occurred within 1 year postoperatively.     

Stability of maxillary advancement for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: preliminary results of an active control equivalence trial for semirigid and rigid fixation of the maxilla

In this paper preliminary results are presented of a prospective study designed to examine the effect of maxillary fixation methods on postoperative stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with semirigid fixation of the maxilla (SRMF) or rigid fixation of the maxilla (RMF). All patients had skeletal Class III malocclusion and underwent bimaxillary surgery (Le Fort I maxillary advancement with or without superior repositioning and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible). Standardized cephalometric analysis was performed on serial radiographs of 42 patients immediately before surgery, 1 week after surgery, after release of fixation, and 1 year postoperatively. The patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 23 patients received RMF (group A), and 19 patients received SRMF (group B). Within the groups, patients showed good stability with regard to their baseline characteristics. To show the therapeutic equivalence of the 2 treatments, analysis of the recorded data followed the approach for an equivalence trial. The mean surgical advancement was 5.34 +/- 1.50 mm for group A and 4.51 +/- 1.37 mm for group B. The mean amount of postsurgical relapse was 0.98 +/- 1.27 mm for group A and 0.30 +/- 1.04 mm for group B. Group A patients experienced 93% of their relapse (0.92 mm) during fixation, while group B patients experienced 96% of their relapse (0.29 mm) after release of fixation. RMF provided better stability than SRMF for all maxillary landmarks in the vertical plane. All considered points both in horizontal and vertical plane exhibited full equivalence for 95% confidence intervals, which seems to indicate equivalent stability between the surgical procedures.     

Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the amount of setback movement and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segments on postoperative stability after orthognathic surgery to correct mandibular prognathism.Thirty-six patients with mandibular prognathism who underwent orthognathic surgery with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy were evaluated. The amount of postoperative relapse was analyzed using a cephalometric analysis.Six months after surgery, the mean backward movement of the mandible at point B was 11.2 mm, the mean intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment was 4.3° and the amount of postoperative relapse at point B was 2.3 mm (20.3%) on average. The tendency of relapse did not significantly increase with the amount of setback but did increase significantly with the intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.This study suggested that postoperative relapse after mandibular setback surgery might be more related to the degree of the intraoperative clockwise movement of the proximal segment, rather than the amount of setback movement. When the amount of mandibular setback is considerable, postoperative relapse might be minimized with adequate control of the intraoperative positioning of the proximal segments.     

Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the stability of combined Le Fort I maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement performed for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion. Twenty-nine patients, mean age 22.6 years, underwent bimaxillary surgery with rigid internal fixation. Standardised cephalometric analyses were performed using serial lateral cephalometric radiographs. The post-surgical follow-up was a minimum of 12 months, with a mean of 25.2 months. The maxilla was impacted by a mean of 4.3 +/- 3.3 mm, and horizontally advanced by a mean of 2.6 +/- 2.3 mm. The results demonstrated that the maxilla tended to move anteriorly and inferiorly but this was not significant in either horizontal or vertical planes (P > 0.05). The mean advancement of the mandible, at menton, was 10.7 +/- 5.6 mm, and in 14 cases (48.2%) menton was advanced greater than 10 mm. In 34.7% of the patients the mandible underwent posterior movement between 2 and 4 mm. In the vertical plane, gonion moved superiorly by a mean of 2.7 +/- 3.6 mm which was significant. Significant mandibular relapse was found to have occurred in five female patients, with high mandibular plane angles who had undergone large advancements of greater than 10 mm. In conclusion, the majority of patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusions maintained a stable result. However, a small number of patients, exhibiting similar characteristics, suffered significant skeletal relapse in the mandible secondary to condylar remodelling and/or resorption.     

Open bite: stability after bimaxillary surgery--2-year treatment outcomes in 58 patients

Stability after bimaxillary surgery to correct open bite malocclusion and mandibular retrognathism was evaluated on lateral cephalograms before surgery, 8 weeks post-operatively, and after 2 years. The 58 consecutive patients were treated to a normal occlusion and good facial aesthetics. Treatment included the orthodontic alignment of teeth by maxillary and mandibular fixed appliances, Le Fort I osteotomy, and bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Twenty-six patients also had a genioplasty. Intra-osseous wires or bicortical screws were used for fixation. Twenty-three patients had maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) for 8 weeks or more, six for 4-7 weeks, 14 for 1-3 weeks, and 15 had no fixation. At follow-up 2 years later, the maxilla remained unchanged and the mandible had rotated on average 1.4 degrees posteriorly. Seventeen patients had an open bite. Among them, eight patients had undergone segmental osteotomies. The relapse was mainly due to incisor proclination. The most stabile overbite was found in the group with no MMF after surgery.     

The stability of facial osteotomies. 4. Maxillary and mandibular (with or without chin) advancement with rigid internal fixation

The short-term (6 weeks postoperative) and long-term (12 months postoperative) horizontal skeletal stability of combined maxillary and mandibular advancement was evaluated by cephalometric analysis of 15 patients.
The mean horizontal advancement of the maxilla was 5.84 mm. Six weeks later a mean horizontal relapse of 0.03 mm (0.05%) was identified. The mean horizontal relapse at long-term follow-up was 0.59 mm (10.1%).
The mean horizontal advancement of the mandible was 12.35 mm at menton and 12.65 mm at pogonion. At 6 weeks, mean horizontal relapse, respectively at the above landmarks, was 0.11 mm and 0.21 mm (1.3%). The mean horizontal relapse at long-term follow-up was 2.19 mm and 1.98 mm (16.6%) respectively for the same landmarks.
Subjectively and objectively, improvements were seen in facial aesthetics and dental occlusion. The results indicate that rigid fixation of osteotomies undertaken to correct 'horizontal facial deficiency' is a surgically predictable and relatively stable procedure when reviewed up to 12 months after surgery.     

Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study

The aim of the study was to conduct a long-term follow-up on the stability of the hard tissues after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with rigid internal fixation (RIF)to set back the mandible and to compare it with that of mandibular advancement performed by the same team of surgeons and with the same examination protocol. Seventeen consecutive patients (6 females and 11 males) could be re-examined 12.7 years (T5) after surgery. The previous examinations were before surgery (T1), 5 days (T2), and 6.6 (T3) and 14.4 (T4) months after surgery. Lateral cephalograms were traced by hand, digitized, and evaluated with the Dentofacial Planner software program. The x-axis for the system of co-ordinates ran through sella (point zero) and the line nasion-sella-line minus 7 degrees. The program determined the x- and y-values of each variable and the usual angles and distances. The effects of treatment were determined with Wilcoxon matched pairs, signed ranks test, with Bonferroni adjustment, and the relationship between variables with Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Relapse at point B was 0.94 mm or 15 per cent and at pogonion 1.46 mm or 21 per cent of the initial setback at T5. Relapse was mainly short-term (T4-T2), 13 per cent for point B and 17 per cent for pogonion. Gender correlated significantly with relapse (T5-T2) at point B (P = 0.002) and pogonion (P = 0.021), i.e. females in contrast to males showed further distalization of the mandible instead of relapse. No correlations were seen for age or the amount of surgical setback. The long-term results in mandibular setback patients were more stable when compared with the mandibular advancement patients examined previously. The initial soft tissue profile, the initial growth direction, and the remodelling processes of the hard tissues must be considered as reasons for long-term relapse. Growth direction positively influenced the long-term results in females: further distalization of the mandible occurred.     

Causes, location, and timing of relapse following rigid fixation after mandibular advancement

The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different groups of patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. One group demonstrated no relapse, whereas a second group had documented relapse. The following questions were asked: 1) What factors contribute to relapse? 2) At what site in the mandible is movement seen? and 3) During what period does movement occur? A retrospective lateral cephalometric serial analysis was performed on 50 patients at multiple time intervals. Criteria for a candidate include 1) mandibular advancement surgery with rigid fixation, with or without genioplasty, 2) no maxillary surgery, and 3) relapse of 25% or more of the advancement. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 13 (26%) showed relapse of 25% or more and served as the relapse group. Twelve patients showed no relapse and served as the comparison group. Multiple-regression analysis for the relapse group showed that magnitude of advancement, increasing gonial arc and changing mandibular plane significantly accounted for 84.9% of the variance observed in relapse (P less than .001). Repeated-measures ANOVA showed that the majority of relapse occurred in the first 6 weeks after surgery (68%, P less than .05). Results of a paired t test showed that a significant change occurred in all the linear and angular measures except SN-AR-GO (P less than .05).     

The stability of mandibular prognathism corrected by bilateral sagittal split osteotomies: a comparison of bi-cortical osteosynthesis and mono-cortical osteosynthesis

This study evaluated the differences in surgical changes and post-surgical changes between bi-cortical and mono-cortical osteosynthesis (MCO) in the correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSOs). Twenty-five patients had bi-cortical osteosynthesis (BCO), 32 patients had mono-cortical fixation. Lateral and postero-anterior cephalometric radiographs, taken at the time of surgery, before surgery, 1 month after surgery, and on completion of orthodontic treatment (mean 9.9 months after surgery), were obtained for evaluation. Cephalometric analysis and superimposition were used to investigate the surgical and post-surgical changes. Independent t-test was performed to compare the difference between the two groups. Pearson's correlations were tested to evaluate the factors related to the relapse of the mandible. The sagittal relapse rate was 20% in the bi-cortical and 25% in the mono-cortical group. The forward-upward rotation of the mandible in the post-surgical period contributed most of the sagittal relapse. There were no statistically significant differences in sagittal and vertical changes between the two groups during surgery and in the post-surgical period. No factors were found to correlate with post-surgical relapse, but the intergonial width increased more in the bi-cortical group. The study suggested that both methods of skeletal fixation had similar postoperative stability.     

Factors contributing to relapse in rigidly fixed mandibular setbacks

The incidence of, and factors accounting for, relapse in 25 subjects who underwent mandibular setbacks via a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with rigid fixation were studied. Fourteen had single-jaw operations, and the remaining 11 had concomitant maxillary procedures. Cephalometric radiographs were reviewed preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months to 3 years after surgery. Relapse was defined as forward movement of pogonion during the postoperative period. No difference in the movement of the mandible in one- or two-jaw cases was noted. Even with excellent occlusal results, there was a tendency for the mandible (chin point) to rotate forward. In the one-jaw cases 43.7% relapse was noted, whereas 53.4% was seen in the two-jaw cases. A regression analysis showed that the magnitude of setback was the single factor that significantly predicted relapse in one-jaw cases, whereas alteration of the proximal segment accounted for relapse in two-jaw procedures. These results seem interrelated when considering alterations in the spatial arrangement of the muscular tissues and their attachments.     

Progressive condylar resorption after mandibular advancement

Progressive condylar resorption is an irreversible complication and a factor in the development of late skeletal relapse after orthognathic surgery. We have evaluated cephalometric characteristics, signs and symptoms in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), and surgical factors in six patients (one man and five women) who developed it after orthognathic surgery. The findings in preoperative cephalograms indicated that the patients had clockwise rotation of the mandible and retrognathism because of a small SNB angle, a wide mandibular plane angle, and a "minus" value for inclination of the ramus. There were erosions or deformities of the condyles, or both, on three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) taken before treatment. The mean (SD) anterior movement of the mandible at operation was 12.1 (3.9)mm and the mean relapse was -6.4 (2.5)mm. The mean change in posterior facial height was 4.5 (2.1)mm at operation and the mean relapse was -5.3 (1.8)mm. Two patients had click, or pain, or both, preoperatively. The click disappeared in one patient postoperatively, but one of the patients who had been symptom-free developed crepitus postoperatively. In the classified resorption pattern, posterior-superior bone loss was seen in three cases, anterior-superior bone loss in two, and superior bone loss in one. Progressive condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery is multifactorial, and some of the risk factors are inter-related. Patients with clockwise rotation of the mandible and retrognathism in preoperative cephalograms; erosion, or deformity of the condyle, or both, on preoperative CT; and wide mandibular advancement and counterclockwise rotation of the mandibular proximal segment at operation, seemed to be at risk. The mandible should therefore be advanced only when the condyles are stable on radiographs, and careful attention should be paid to postoperative mechanical loading on the TMJ in high-risk patients.     

Effects of wire and miniplate fixation on mandibular stability and TMJ symptoms following orthognathic surgery

The effects of wire and miniplate fixations on mandibular stability and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) symptoms were analyzed in 145 patients in whom mandibular prognathism had been corrected by the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). The subjects were divided into two groups based on the method of fixation. Group I consisted of 105 patients treated with intraosseous wiring and group II consisted of 40 patients treated with titanium miniplates. The mean maxillomandibular fixation periods for groups I and II were 48 days and 23 days, respectively. Lateral cephalograms were taken immediately before surgery, within a week after surgery, and at least a year after surgery. Changes in the positions of the incisal edge of the lower central incisors, point B, pogonion, and menton were examined. TMJs were examined clinically for pain, sounds, movements, and limitations before treatment and at least a year after surgery. In both groups, the mean of the horizontal relapses was correlated to the magnitude of their surgical movements. In group II, the mean horizontal relapse was smaller, but not significantly more than that of group I. There was no statistical difference in the pre‐ and postoperative incidence of TMJ signs and symptoms between the two groups. It can be concluded that miniplate fixation for the BSSO procedure has the advantages of shortening the maxillomandibular fixation period and maintaining the postoperative stability of the mandible without causing adverse effects on the TMJ.     

Stability two years after mandibular advancement with and without suprahyoid myotomy: an experimental study

Ten adult rhesus monkeys underwent mandibular advancement surgery of 4-6 mm with and without suprahyoid myotomy. Serial lateral cephalograms using radiopaque bone markers were obtained during maxillomandibular fixation and for 96 weeks after release of fixation to determine the effects of suprahyoid myotomy on short-term and long-term adaptations in the advanced mandible. The non-myotomy group exhibited a significant reduction in the length of the advanced mandible (relapse) during the fixation period but showed no significant change in mandibular length after release of fixation. The myotomy group exhibited no relapse during the fixation period and after release of fixation displayed a slight but statistically significant increase in mandibular length. This supports the hypothesis that stretching of the suprahyoid musculature as a result of mandibular advancement surgery is a major factor leading to skeletal relapse.     

Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.

PURPOSE: This study examined the stability of skeletal changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation up to 2 years postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects for this multisite, prospective, clinical trial received rigid (n = 78) or wire (n = 49) fixation. The rigid cases were fixed with three 2-mm bicortical position screws and 1 to 2 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with elastics, and the wire fixation subjects were fixed with inferior border wires and had 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained before orthodontics, immediately before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior sagittal advancement of the mandibular symphysis was 4.92 +/3.01 mm in the rigid group and 5.11 +/- 3.09 mm in the wire group, and the inferior vertical displacement was 3.37 +/- 2.44 in the rigid group and 2.85 +/- 1.78 in the wire group. The vertical changes were similar in both groups. Two years postsurgery, the wire group had 30% sagittal relapse of the mandibular symphysis, whereas there was no change in the rigid group (P < .001). Both groups experienced changes in the orientation and configuration of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid fixation is a more stable method than wire fixation for maintaining mandibular advancement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.     

Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study

This study aimed to investigate the postoperative longitudinal skeletal changes and stability following intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies (IVRO) for orthognathic mandibular setback, and the possible risk factors that might affect the stability. A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed for the predictor (magnitude of setback and adjunctive procedures) and outcome (stability of vertical and horizontal dimensions) variables at six time points. A total of 152 patients (mean age 24.2 years) were included in the study. Following IVRO, the mandible measured at B-point had moved a mean 0.50 mm posteriorly at 1 week after the removal of intermaxillary fixation (7 weeks postoperative); this was followed by progressive small anterior relapse. At 2 years postoperative, the mean relapse of the mandible after IVRO measured at B-point was 0.05 mm (standard deviation 1.14 mm), representing 0.7% of the mean surgical movement. Large setback (>8 mm) showed significantly higher relapse compared to small setback (<4 mm) at 2 years after surgery (P = 0.021). Patients who underwent adjunctive mandibular surgeries other than IVRO showed no significant differences in relapse compared to those who underwent IVRO alone. In conclusion, IVRO for mandibular setback is a stable procedure in the long term, with small relapse of 0.05 mm after 2 years.     

下颌骨双侧升支矢状劈开双皮质螺钉内固定的生物力学分析

目的:对下颌骨升支矢状劈开不同方式双皮质固位螺钉内固定进行三维有限元分析,为临床提供理论指导。方法:建立下颌骨升支矢状劈开6种双皮质螺钉固定方式的三维有限元模型;计算不同固定方法在3种咬合情况下颌骨的应力、内固定系统的应力以及骨劈开处的位移,对比这些固定方式的固定效果以及不同咬合情况对固定稳定性的影响。结果:在相同咬合情况下,颌骨的应力、内固定系统的应力以及劈开处的位移的大小情况如下:单纯上缘固定大于倒"L"型固定;直径2.0mm大于直径2.7mm螺钉固定;倒"L"型60°大于倒"L"型90°和120°固定;间距2.0cm大于间距3.0cm固定。相同固定方式情况下,颌骨的应力、内固定系统的应力以及劈开处的位移从大到小排列顺序为:前牙咬合、前磨牙咬合、磨牙咬合。结论:双皮质固位螺钉内固定的排列方式,如:间距、角度、位置和内固定系统的规格均对固定稳定性有不同程度的影响;前牙咬合对固定的不良影响最大,应尽量避免。