Combination of chemotherapy and gefitinib as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and sensitive EGFR mutations: A randomized controlled trial

To explore the optimal treatment strategy for patients who harbor sensitive EGFR mutations, a head‐to‐head study was performed to compare chemotherapy and gefitinib in combination or with either agent alone as first‐line therapy, in terms of efficacy and safety. A total of 121 untreated patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who harbored sensitive EGFR mutations were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin, pemetrexed plus carboplatin or gefitinib alone. The progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients in the combination group (17.5 months, 95% CI, 15.3–19.7) was longer than that of patients in the chemotherapy group (5.7 months, 95% CI, 5.2–6.3) or gefitinib (11.9 months, 95% CI, 9.1–14.6) group. The (hazard ratios) HRs of PFS for the combination group vs. chemotherapy and gefitinib groups were 0.16 (95% CI, 0.09–0.29, p < 0.001) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.29–0.78, p = 0.003), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) in the combination therapy group, chemotherapy group and the gefitinib group was 82.5%, 32.5% and 65.9%, respectively. The combinational strategy resulted in longer overall survival (OS) than chemotherapy (HR = 0.46, p = 0.016) or gefitinib (HR = 0.36, p = 0.001) alone. Our finding suggested that treatment with pemetrexed plus carboplatin combined with gefitinib could provide better survival benefits for patients with lung adenocarcinoma harboring sensitive EGFR mutations.     

Pretreatment direct bilirubin and total cholesterol are significant predictors of overall survival in advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations

This study was designed to examine the prediction of pretreatment circulating bilirubin and cholesterol for overall survival in 459 advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Circulating total bilirubin, direct bilirubin (DB), total cholesterol (TC), high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C) and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels were measured at baseline. The mean age (standard deviation) of all study patients was 58.7 (10.5) years, and 42.9% of them was males. Ever smokers accounted for 27.0% and lung adenocarcinoma for 90.4%. The median follow‐up time and survival time were 29.5 and 34.9 months, respectively. Patients with higher DB had a 1.68‐fold increased risk of death compared with patients with lower DB (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–2.30, p = 0.001), while patients with higher TC were at a 63% reduced risk of death compared with patients with lower TC (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.20–0.67, p = 0.001). As for HDL‐C, patients with higher levels had the risk of death reduced by 46% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.29–1.00, p = 0.049) compared with patients with lower levels. After the Bonferroni correction, only DB and TC were significantly associated with NSCLC survival. Our findings demonstrate for the first time that pretreatment DB was identified as a significant risk factor, yet TC as a protective factor, for overall survival in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.     

Clinical outcomes and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation among first-line gefitinib,erlotinib and afatinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations

Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) bearing an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, the clinical outcomes among the three EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still controversial. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and secondary EGFR T790M mutation among the three EGFR TKIs. From May 2014 to January 2016, a total of 301 patients received treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, based on their clinicians’ choice. The median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 months. Although the baseline characteristics of patients were unequal, progression-free survival and OS did not differ among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis found that gefitinib (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–9.46, p = 0.027), EGFR TKI treatment duration more than 13 months (aOR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.20–8.33, p = 0.020), male (aOR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.10–9.66, p = 0.034), initial liver metastasis (aOR 4.97, 95% CI 1.18–20.96, p = 0.029) and uncommon EGFR mutation (aOR 0.14, 95% CI, 0.02–0.97, compared to EGFR deletion 19, p = 0.047) were independent factors for secondary T790M mutation. In real-world practice, choosing first line EGFR TKI based on the patients’ clinical characteristics yielded good clinical outcomes. First-line gefitinib, longer EGFR TKI treatment duration, male, initial liver metastasis and uncommon EGFR mutations may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation.     

Outcomes of Malaysian patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and unknown epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status treated with gefitinib

Aims: To evaluate the response and progression‐free survival (PFS) of Malaysian patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and unknown epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status treated with gefitinib. Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with EGFR mutation unknown stage III or IV lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutation unknown treated with gefitinib until disease progression. Results: Of 71 patients, none had complete response while 26 (36.6%) had partial response and 26 (36.6%) had stable disease. Multivariate analysis showed the independent predictor of response to gefitinib was Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 1 (odds ratio [OR] 5.39, 95% confidence interval [CI 1.64–17.74]P = 0.006). The median PFS was 6.5 months and was significantly longer in female than male patients (39.0 vs 21.2 weeks; P < 0.001), never smokers vs smokers (32.3 vs 8.3 weeks, P = 0.001), and stage III versus stage IV disease (44 vs 24 weeks, P = 0.021). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model with age group, gender, ethnicity, smoking history, disease stage, ECOG performance status and prior cytotoxic chemotherapy as covariates, the independent predictors of longer median PFS were female gender (HR 95% CI 0.38 [0.22–0.66]; P < 0.001) and stage III disease (HR 95% CI 0.54 [0.30–0.98], P = 0.042). Conclusion: In our patients with EGFR mutation unknown advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with gefitinib, the response rate was 36.6% and the median PFS was significantly longer in female patients, never smokers and patients with stage III disease.     

EGFR mutations and human papillomavirus in squamous cell carcinoma of tongue and tonsil

This study was performed to determine the clinical significance of mutations in the EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) along with their association with human papillomavirus (HPV) infections in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). Exons 18-21 of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain were sequenced and HPV typing was carried out using the HPV DNA chip in tissues obtained from patients with tongue and tonsil cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the significant factors. One hundred and eight patients were enrolled. Ten patients (9%) were HPV positive and 17 (16%) had EGFR mutations. None of the patients with EGFR mutations were HPV positive. Gender, age (<60 years versus 60 years), and smoking history were not associated with EGFR mutations. A higher percentage of patients with tonsillar cancer were HPV positive than those with tongue cancer (26% and 0%, respectively; P<0.001). EGFR mutations were not a significant prognostic factor (P=0.746). HPV-positive patients had prolonged survival (P=0.025). Multivariate analysis revealed a longer overall survival in HPV-positive patients (P=0.007). EGFR mutations are not associated with the HPV-positive status, which may confer a better survival outcome. Clinical features of lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations were not observed in HNSCC. A further study will be needed to confirm these results.     

Role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer

NRAS mutations occur in 3–5% of colorectal cancer. Differently from KRAS and BRAF mutations, the role of NRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been investigated to a lesser extent. A retrospective series suggested the role of NRAS mutations as predictors of resistance to anti‐EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) in chemo‐refractory patients with mCRC. In our study, KRAS codons 12, 13, 61 and BRAF codon 600 mutational status were evaluated in mCRCs referred to our Institution from 2009 to 2012. NRAS codons 12, 13 and 61 mutational status was analyzed in KRAS/BRAF wt patients. We collected pathological and clinical features in the overall population and outcome data in a subset of NRAS mutated chemo‐refractory patients treated with anti‐EGFR MoAbs in advanced lines. NRAS was mutated in 47/786 (6%) mCRCs. NRAS and KRAS mutated tumors did not show significant differences in terms of clinical and pathological characteristics, except for a lower prevalence of mucinous histology (p = 0.012) and lung metastases (p = 0.012) among NRAS mutated tumors. In the uni‐ and multivariate model, NRAS mutations were associated with shorter overall survival (OS) compared to all wt patients (median OS 25.6 vs 42.7 months; univ: HR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.39–3.86, p = 0.0013; multiv: HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.1.3–2.72, p = 0.013). None of the chemo‐refractory NRAS mutated patients evaluable for response to anti‐EGFRs achieved response. In conclusion, NRAS mutations have a relevant incidence in patients with mCRC and showed an association with specific clinical and pathological features. NRAS mutations affect mCRC patients' prognosis and predict lack of response to anti‐EGFRs.     

COX-2/EGFR expression and survival among women with adenocarcinoma of the lung

Previous studies suggest that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression may predict survival among patients with non-small cell lung cancer. COX-2 may interact with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), suggesting that combined COX-2/EGFR expression may provide predictive value. The extent to which their independent or combined expression is associated with prognosis in women with adenocarcinoma of the lung is unknown. In the present study, we examined relationships between COX-2 expression (n = 238), EGFR expression (n = 158) and dual COX-2/EGFR expression (n = 157) and survival among women with adenocarcinoma of the lung. Overall survival was estimated by constructing Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for other significant variables and stratifying by stage at diagnosis and race. Clinical or demographic parameters were not associated with either COX-2 or EGFR expression. Patients with COX-2-positive tumors tended to have poorer prognosis than did patients with COX-2-negative tumors [hazard ratio (HR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-2.78]. African-Americans with COX-2-positive tumors had a statistically non-significant higher risk of death than African-Americans with COX-2-negative tumors (HR 5.58, 95% CI 0.64-48.37). No association between COX-2 expression and survival was observed among Caucasians (HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.72-2.30). EGFR expression was associated with a 44% reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.98). COX-2-/EGFR+ tumor expression, but not COX-2+/EGFR+ tumor expression, was associated with survival when compared with other combined expression results. In conclusion, COX-2 and EGFR expression, but not combined COX-2+/EGFR+ expression, independently predict survival of women with adenocarcinoma of the lung.     

Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and histologic subtypes with lung adenocarcinoma

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status has become one of the most important factors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. However, the relationship between EGFR mutation and the histologic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma remains to be fully elucidated. We examined the relationship between the predominant subtype of adenocarcinoma and the prognosis and investigated the correlation between a new subtype of adenocarcinoma and EGFR mutations. This study included 182 patients with adenocarcinoma who underwent complete resection. The rate of EGFR mutation-positive patients was significantly higher among female patients, never smokers, patients with small tumors (< 3 cm in size), patients with well-differentiated tumors, and patients with a pStage I classification. The rates of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and lepidic-predominant subtype were high in male EGFR mutation-positive patients. The prevalence of the acinar and papillary-predominant subtypes was high among EGFR mutation-positive female patients, as was AIS, MIA, and the lepidic-predominant subtype. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the EGFR mutation-positive patients was significantly better than that of the EGFR mutation-negative patients (75.8 vs 67.1%, p = 0.03). However, the multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic and histologic factors did not reveal the prognostic impact of the EGFR mutation status on PFS. The overall survival (OS) of the EGFR mutation-positive patients was significantly better than that of the EGFR mutation-negative patients (93.7 vs 63.4%, p < 0.01). However, in the multivariate analysis the EGFR mutation status was not significantly associated with OS.     

Influence of mRNA expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin on outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with 5‐FU/LV plus irinotecan or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first‐line treatment (FIRE 1‐trial)

Our aim was to investigate the impact of EREG and AREG mRNA expression (by RT‐qPCR) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In addition, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (by immunohistochemistry) as well as RAS‐and PIK3CA‐mutations (by pyrosequencing) were assessed. Tumors of 208 mCRC patients receiving 5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan (FUFIRI) or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) within the FIRE‐1 trial were analyzed for mutations. Molecular characteristics were correlated with response, progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). mRNA expression was evaluated using ROC‐analysis in 192 tumors (AREG high n = 31 vs. low n = 161; EREG high n = 89 vs. low n = 103). High versus low AREG expression was associated with PFS of 10.0 versus 8.0 months (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.402–0.940, p = 0.03) and OS of 24.6 versus 18.7 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.476–1.078, p = 0.11). High versus low EREG expression correlated with prolonged PFS (9.4 vs. 6.8 months, HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.460–0.846, p = 0.002) and OS (25.8 vs. 15.5 months, HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.351–0.657, p < 0.001). The positive prognostic effect of high EREG expression was confirmed in a multivariate analysis and was neither affected by EGFR expression nor by mutations of RAS‐ and PIK3CA‐genes. EREG expression appears as an independent prognostic marker in patients with mCRC receiving first‐line irinotecan‐based chemotherapy.     

Promising biomarkers for predicting the outcomes of patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies: A systematic review with meta‐analysis

KRAS mutations have been established as a major predictive biomarker for resistance to the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibodies (anti‐EGFR MoAbs). However, many patients with KRAS wild‐type tumors still do not respond to the treatment. We conducted a systematic review with meta‐analysis to assess whether BRAF mutations, PIK3CA mutations and PTEN loss can predict the outcomes of patients with KRAS wild‐type mCRC treated with anti‐EGFR MoAbs. Studies that explored the association of one or more of the three biomarkers with progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and/or objective response rate (ORR) were identified through August 2012. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) and rate differences (RDs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using the random‐effects model. BRAF mutations, PIK3CA exon 20 mutations and PTEN loss were all associated with shorter PFS (HR = 2.59, 95% CI 1.67–4.03; HR = 2.52, 95% CI 1.33–4.78 and HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.19–2.56, respectively), shorter OS (HR = 2.74, 95% CI 1.79–4.19; HR = 3.29, 95% CI 1.60–6.75 and HR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.30–2.64, respectively) and lower ORR (RD = ?36%, 95% CI ?44 to ?28%; RD = ?38%, 95% CI ?51 to ?24% and RD = ?41%, 95% CI ?68 to ?14%, respectively). PIK3CA exon 9 mutations were associated with none of the outcomes. Studies with relevant data consistently demonstrated a stronger predictive power of combined multiple biomarkers as compared to one alteration alone. These results suggest that BRAF mutations, PIK3CA exon 20 mutations and PTEN loss are predictive of better outcomes in KRAS wild‐type mCRC treated with anti‐EGFR MoAbs. However, the quality of included studies varied, and some of the meta‐analyses were limited by significant between‐study heterogeneity. In the future, well‐designed large randomized controlled trials conducted in KRAS wild‐type mCRC patients with subgroup analysis according to BRAF, PIK3CA exon 20 and PTEN status are essential to fully assess the clinical relevance of these biomarkers.     

First‐line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–tyrosine kinase inhibitor alone or with whole‐brain radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients with EGFR‐mutated lung adenocarcinoma

We proposed to compare the outcomes of first‐line epidermal growth factor receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR‐TKI) alone with EGFR‐TKI plus whole‐brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of brain metastases (BM) in patients with EGFR‐mutated lung adenocarcinoma. A total of 1665 patients were screened from 2008 to 2014, and 132 were enrolled in our study. Among the 132 patients, 72 (54.5%) harbored a deletion in exon 19, 97 (73.5%) showed multiple intracranial lesions, and 67 (50.8%) had asymptomatic BM. Seventy‐nine patients (59.8%) were treated with EGFR‐TKI alone, 53 with concomitant WBRT. The intracranial objective response rate was significantly higher in the EGFR‐TKI plus WBRT treatment group (67.9%) compared with the EGFR‐TKI alone group (39.2%) (P = 0.001). After a median follow‐up of 36.2 months, 62.1% of patients were still alive. The median intracranial TTP was 24.7 months (95% CI, 19.5–29.9) in patients who received WBRT, which was significantly longer than in those who received EGFR‐TKI alone, with the median intracranial TTP of 18.2 months (95% CI, 12.5–23.9) (P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in overall survival between WBRT and EGFR‐TKI alone groups, (median, 48.0 vs 41.1 months; P = 0.740). The overall survival is significantly prolonged in patients who had an intracranial TTP exceeding 22 months compared to those who developed intracranial progression <22 months after treatment, (median, 58.0 vs 28.0 months; P = 0.001). For EGFR‐mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients with BM, treatment with concomitant WBRT achieved a higher response rate of BM and significant improvement in intracranial progression‐free survival compared with EGFR‐TKI alone.     

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers in a Multiethnic Malaysian Patient Population

Background: Mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in nonsmallcell lung cancer (NSCLC) are predictive of response to EGFR-targeted therapy in advanced stages of disease.This study aimed to determine the frequency of EGFR mutations in NSCLCs and to correlate their presencewith clinical characteristics in multiethnic Malaysian patients. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study,EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens of consecutiveNSCLC patients were asessed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results: EGFR mutations were detected inNSCLCs from 55 (36.4%) of a total of 151 patients, being significantly more common in females (62.5%) than inmales (17.2%) [odds ratio (OR), 8.00; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.77-16.98; p<0.001] and in never smokers(62.5%) than in ever smokers (12.7%) (OR, 11.50; 95%CI, 5.08-26.03; p<0.001). Mutations were more commonin adenocarcinoma (39.4%) compared to non-adenocarcinoma NSCLCs (15.8%) (p=0.072). The mutation ratesin patients of different ethnicities were not significantly different (p=0.08). Never smoking status was the onlyclinical feature that independently predicted the presence of EGFR mutations (adjusted OR, 5.94; 95%CI, 1.94-18.17; p=0.002). Conclusions: In Malaysian patients with NSCLC, the EGFR mutation rate was similar to thatin other Asian populations. EGFR mutations were significantly more common in female patients and in neversmokers. Never smoking status was the only independent predictor for the presence of EGFR mutations.     

Increased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number is strongly associated with EGFR mutations and adenocarcinoma in non-small cell lung cancers: a chromogenic in situ hybridization study of 182 patients

SUMMARY: To evaluate the association of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number with EGFR and k-ras mutation status and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), EGFR gene copy number of 182 NSCLC tumor specimens were analyzed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). EGFR and k-ras mutation analyses were also performed for, respectively, 176 and 157 of the 182 patients. Additionally, 36 patients in this study had received TKI monotherapy. The tumor was considered to be CISH positive if the gene copy number was >or=5 signals per nucleus in >or=40% of tumor cells. CISH-positive tumors were strongly associated with adenocarcinoma (56.8%) compared with squamous cell carcinoma (15.9%) (p<0.0001). The CISH-positive tumors were also strongly associated with EGFR mutations (78%) compared with wild type (20.2%) (p<0.0001). Only six tumors had k-ras mutations. None had EGFR mutation and only one was CISH positive. In the patients treated with TKI, EGFR mutation was strongly associated with TKI responsiveness (22/25 responders) (p<0.0001), but the CISH-positive tumors were only marginally significant (18/25 responders) (p=0.0665). Patients with EGFR mutations or CISH-positive tumors were all associated with longer median survival, although not statistically significant. Our results suggest Increased EGFR copy number was highly correlated with EGFR mutation in adenocarcinoma. Although it is less correlated with TKI responsiveness when compared with EGFR mutations, it still could be a good alternative molecular predictive marker for TKI responsiveness, since CISH can be done on paraffin section and is much quicker than DNA sequencing.     

EGFR and K-Ras mutations in women with lung adenocarcinoma: implications for treatment strategy definition

Background

We aimed at investigating the outcomes of female patients with stage IIIB-IV adenocarcinoma of the lung according to EGFR and K-Ras mutational status.

Methods

One hundred and three consecutive female patients genotyped at a single Italian Institution were analyzed. Patients were planned to receive first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) and a salvage treatment with anti-EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was proposed irrespective of tumor mutational status. EGFR (exons 18–21) and K-Ras (exon 2, codons 12–13) mutations were evaluated by real-time PCR and pyrosequencing. The association of mutational status with clinical variables and treatment benefit was investigated by chi-square test and log-rank test.

Results

EGFR and K-Ras mutations were found in 31 (30%) and 13 (15%) cases, respectively. Sixty-six patients received platinum CT: no correlation was observed between EGFR or K-Ras mutational status and response rate (RR) (p > 0.05). However, patients treated with first-line CT harboring EGFR activating mutations experienced a significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS) in comparison with wild-type ones (4.4 vs. 6.4 months, respectively; HR 0.597, 95% CI 0.287-0.975; p = 0.048). Thirty-nine patients received salvage treatment with erlotinib: EGFR activating mutations were significantly correlated with RR (60% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.004) and PFS (11.4 vs. 4.5 months; HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.216-0.936; p = 0.044). Responses to erlotinib were not reported among women with K-Ras mutant tumors, while 50% of those with wild-type K-Ras achieved an objective remission (p = 0.296). Median PFS (3.5 vs. 8.8 months; HR 0.284, 95% CI 0.015-0.510; p = 0.010) and OS (3.9 vs. 19.8 months; HR 0.158, 95% CI 0.001-0.075; p < 0.001) were significantly shorter among K-Ras mutant patients treated with TKI.

Conclusions

In our population of Caucasian women with advanced lung adenocarcinoma we observed that the presence of EGFR activating mutations correlates with a significant reduction in the benefit from first-line platinum-based CT, emphasizing the importance of an upfront use of anti-EGFR TKIs in this patient subset. K-Ras mutations seem to correlate with a detrimental effect from anti-EGFR TKI, but this finding deserves further investigation.     

Different characteristics and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients with primary and acquired EGFR T790M mutation

Primary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation can be occasionally identified in previous untreated nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with primary and acquired EGFR T790M mutation, we collected the data of patients diagnosed with EGFR mutation from 2012 to 2017 in Shanghai Chest Hospital. Primary EGFR T790M mutation was identified in 61 patients (1.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8%–1.3%) of 5685 TKI-naive EGFR mutant patients. Acquired T790M mutation was detected in 98 patients (50.3%; 95%CI: 43.2%–57.3%) of 195 TKI-treated patients. T790M mutation always coexisted with sensitizing EGFR mutations. Primary EGFR T790M always coexisted with 21L858R (46/61) whereas acquired T790M coexisted with 19del (68/98), (p < 0.001). Among them, 18 patients with primary T790M mutation received osimertinib and 72 patients with acquired T790M mutation received osimertinib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of osimertinib was significantly longer in primary T790M group (17.0 months, 95%CI:14.0–20.0 months) compared to acquired T790M group (10.0 months, 95%CI:8.6–11.4 months, p = 0.022). However, the median overall survival (OS) of acquired T790M mutation patients was significantly longer compared to that of primary T790M mutation patients who received osimertinib (50.4 months vs. 29.9 months, p = 0.016). Our findings suggest that primary T790M mutation likely coexists with 21L858R while acquired mutation likely coexists with 19del. Both mutations showed good response to osimertinib. Patients with primary T790M mutation experienced greater benefits from osimertinib. However, patients with acquired T790M mutation had a better overall survival during the entire clinical treatment.     

Mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in lung cancer: biological and clinical implications

Recently it has been reported that mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) gene occur in a subset of patients with lung cancer showing a dramatic response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To gain further insights in the role of EGFR in lung carcinogenesis, we sequenced exons 18-21 of the tyrosine kinase domain using total RNA extracted from unselected 277 patients with lung cancer who underwent surgical resection and correlated the results with clinical and pathologic features. EGFR mutations were present in 111 patients (40%). Fifty-two were in-frame deletions around codons 746-750 in exon 19, 54 were point mutations including 49 at codon 858 in exon 21 and 4 at codon 719 in exon 18, and 5 were duplications/insertions mainly in exon 20. They were significantly more frequent in female (P < 0.001), adenocarcinomas (P = 0.0013), and in never-smokers (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis suggested EGFR mutations were independently associated with adenocarcinoma histology (P = 0.0012) and smoking status (P < 0.001), but not with female gender (P = 0.9917). In adenocarcinomas, EGFR mutations were more frequent in well to moderately differentiated tumors (P < 0.001) but were independent of patient age, disease stages, or patient survival. KRAS and TP53 mutations were present in 13 and 41%, respectively. EGFR mutations never occurred in tumors with KRAS mutations, whereas EGFR mutations were independent of TP53 mutations. EGFR mutations define a distinct subset of pulmonary adenocarcinoma without KRAS mutations, which is not caused by tobacco carcinogens.     

Concurrent radiotherapy plus epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in patients with human papillomavirus-related head and neck cancer

Purpose

Concurrent radio-chemotherapy (RT-CT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC), but RT plus epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors is an effective option when CT is not appropriate. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with an improved prognosis in LA-HNSCC; however, it has not been fully studied as a prognostic factor after RT + EGFR inhibitors.

Experimental design

Immunohistochemical expression of p16INK4A and PCR of HPV16 DNA were retrospectively analyzed in tumor blocks from 52 stage III/IV LA-HNSCC patients treated with RT + EGFR inhibitors. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

DNA of HPV16 was found in six of 52 tumors (12 %) and p16 positivity in eight tumors (15 %). After a median follow-up time of 45 months (6–110), p16-positive patients treated with RT + EGFR inhibitors showed an improved DFS (2-year DFS 75 vs. 44 %, HR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.06–0.99, p = 0.047) compared with p16-negative patients. These differences were outperformed when compared by HPV16 status (2-year OS rates of 83 vs. 58 %, HR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.02–0.99, p = 0.049 and 2-year DFS rates of 83 vs. 45 %, HR 0.17, 95 % CI 0.02–0.99, p = 0.049). In the Cox regression analysis with OS as the end point, ECOG 0–1 was the only prognostic factor independently associated with a good prognosis in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

In this study, p16/HPV16-positive patients with LA-HNSCC treated with RT + EGFR inhibitors showed a better survival, not confirmed in multivariate analysis.     

Clinical predictors versus epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in gefitinib-treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Clinical predictors including Asian, female, adenocarcinoma and never-smoker and epidermal growth factor mutation are associated with gefitinib responsiveness in non-small-cell lung cancer. Direct comparison between clinical predictors and EGFR mutation for their predictive power has not been reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 120 Korean NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib, we have analyzed EGFR mutational status in exons 18, 19 and 21. Patients were grouped according to the number of clinical predictors (female, adenocarcinoma and never-smoker). Response rate (RR), time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate which approach yielded better prediction. RESULTS: RRs according to number of clinical predictors were 0: 3.4%, 1: 17.1%, 2: 29.4% and 3: 33.3% (p=0.002). Patients with gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation showed 61.9% RR compared with 12.1% in the remaining patients (p<0.001). RRs were higher in patients with the EGFR mutations regardless of the number of clinical predictors. In multivariate analysis, gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation showed higher odds ratio of response (9.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-28.7) compared with number of clinical predictors (1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.7). Hazard ratio (HR) of TTP was also better in gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation (0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.47) than number of clinical predictors (0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99). Only gefitinib-sensitive EGFR mutation was associated with improved OS (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.12-0.52). CONCLUSION: EGFR mutation should be analyzed whenever possible for effective prediction of objective benefit from gefitinib in NSCLC patients with one or more clinical predictors.     

Frequency and clinical significance of NF1 mutation in lung adenocarcinomas from East Asian patients

NF1 is a tumor suppressor gene that negatively regulates Ras signaling. NF1 deficiency plays an important role in carcinogenesis. To investigate the frequency and clinical significance of NF1 mutation, we examined mutation status of NF1, TP53, LKB1 and RB1 in 704 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas from East Asian patients using semiconductor-based Ion Torrent sequencing platform. Common driver events, including mutations in EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, and fusions affecting ALK, RET and ROS1, were also concurrently detected. The correlation between NF1 mutations and clinicomolecular features of patients was further evaluated. Among 704 patients, 42 NF1 mutations were found in 33 patients (33/704, 4.7%), including 14 patients harboring EGFR/NF1 comutations (14/33, 42.4%). Comparing with EGFR-mutant patients, patients harboring NF1 mutations were closely associated with solid component subtype (p = 0.028). Comparing with KRAS mutations, NF1 mutations were found more common in female and never smokers (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that patients harboring NF1 mutation had similar disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with patients with KRAS mutation. Although frequently overlapped with EGFR mutation, patients harboring NF1 mutation had significantly shorter DFS (p = 0.019) and OS (p = 0.004) than patients with EGFR mutation. During follow-up, one female patient with EGFR exon 19 deletion and NF1 Q1815X comutation showed poor response to EGFR TKIs (Gefitinib and Osimertinib) after disease relapse. In conclusion, NF1 mutations define a unique molecular and clinicopathologic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma. Examination of NF1 mutation may contribute to molecular subtyping and therapeutic intervention of lung adenocarcinoma.