Prostaglandin d synthase is a potential novel therapeutic agent for the treatment of gastric carcinomas expressing PPARγ

The antitumor activity of prostaglandin (PG) D₂ has been demonstrated against some types of cancer, including gastric cancer. However, exogenous PGD₂ is not useful from a clinical point of view because it is rapidly metabolized in vivo. The aim of this study was to clarify the antitumor efficacy of an alternative, PGD synthase (PGDS), on gastric cancer cells. The effects of PGD₂ and PGDS on the proliferation of gastric cancer cells were examined in vivo and in vitro. The expression levels of PGD₂ receptors and peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ) were evaluated by RT‐PCR. The effects of a PPARγ antagonist or siPPARγ on the proliferation of cancer cells and the c‐myc and cyclin D1 expression were examined in the presence or absence of PGD₂ or PGDS. PPARγ was expressed in gastric cancer cell lines, but PGD₂ receptors were not. PGD₂ and PGDS significantly decreased the proliferation of gastric cancer cells that highly expressed PPARγ. PGDS increased the PGD₂ production of gastric cancer cells. A PPARγ antagonist and siPPARγ transfection significantly suppressed the growth‐inhibitory effects of PGD₂ and PGDS. Expression of c‐myc and cyclin D1 was significantly decreased by PGD₂; this inhibitory effect was suppressed by PPARγ antagonist. Both PGD₂ and PGDS significantly decreased subcutaneous tumor growth in vivo. Tumor volume after PGDS treatment was significantly less than PGD₂ treatment. These findings suggest that PGDS and PGD₂ decrease the proliferation of gastric cancer cells through PPARγ signaling. PGDS is a potentially promising therapeutic agent for gastric cancers that express PPARγ.     

Loss of PPARγ expression in mammary secretory epithelial cells creates a pro‐breast tumorigenic environment

Breast cancer is the leading cause of new cancer diagnoses among women. Using peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor (PPAR)γ^(+/?) mice, we showed normal expression of PPARγ was critical to stop 7,12‐dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)‐induced breast tumorigenesis. PPARγ is expressed in many breast cell types including mammary secretory epithelial (MSE) cells. MSEs proliferate as required during pregnancy, and undergo apoptosis or reversible transdifferentiation during involution once lactation is complete. Thus, MSE‐specific loss of PPARγ was hypothesized to enhance DMBA‐mediated breast tumorigenesis. To test this, MSE cell‐specific PPARγ knockout (PPARγ‐MSE KO) and control (PPARγ‐WT) mice were generated, mated and allowed to nurse for three days. One week after involution, dams were treated with DMBA to initiate breast tumors, and randomized on week 7 to continue receiving a normal chow diet (DMBA Only: PPARγ‐WT, n = 15; PPARγ‐MSE KO, n = 25) or one supplemented with a PPARγ activating drug (DMBA + ROSI: PPARγ‐WT, n = 17; PPARγ‐MSE KO, n = 24), and monitored for changes in breast tumor outcomes. PPARγ‐MSE KOs had significantly lower overall survival and decreased mammary tumor latency as compared to PPARγ‐WT controls. PPARγ activation significantly reduced DMBA‐mediated malignant mammary tumor volumes irrespective of genotype. MSE‐specific PPARγ loss resulted in decreased mammary gland expression of PTEN and Bax, increased superoxide anion production, and elevated serum eotaxin and RANTES, creating a protumorigenic environment. Moreover, PPARγ activation in MSEs delayed mammary tumor growth in part by down‐regulating Cox‐1, Cox‐2 and cyclin D1. Collectively, these studies highlight a protective role of MSE‐specific PPARγ during breast tumorigenesis, and support a novel chemotherapeutic role of PPARγ activation in breast cancer.     

Regulation of peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐β/δ by the APC/β‐CATENIN pathway and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

Studies indicate that peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor‐β/δ (PPARβ/δ) can either attenuate or potentiate colon cancer. One hypothesis suggests that PPARβ/δ is upregulated by the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC)/β‐CATENIN pathway and a related hypothesis suggests that PPARβ/δ is downregulated by nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The present study examined these possibilities using in vivo and in vitro models. While APC/β‐CATENIN‐dependent expression of CYCLIN D1 was observed in vivo and in vitro, expression of PPARβ/δ was not different in colon or intestinal polyps from wild‐type or Apc^min heterozygous mice or in human colon cancer cell lines with mutations in APC and/or β‐CATENIN. No difference in the level of PPARβ/δ was found in colon from wild‐type or Apc^min heterozygous mice following treatment with NO‐donating aspirin (NO‐ASA). NSAIDs inhibited cell growth in RKO (wild‐type APC) and DLD1 (mutant APC) human colon cancer cell lines but expression of PPARβ/δ was not downregulated in these cell lines in response to a broad concentration range of celecoxib, indomethacin, NS‐398, or nimesulide. However, indomethacin caused an increase in PPARβ/δ mRNA and protein that was accompanied with increased expression of a known PPARβ/δ target gene. Interestingly, expression of PPARα was also increased in the human colon cancer cell lines by several NSAIDs at the highest concentration examined. Results from these studies provide additional evidence indicating that PPARβ/δ is not upregulated by the APC/β‐CATENIN pathway. Further, these studies suggest that increased PPARβ/δ and/or PPARα by NSAIDs in human colon cancer cell lines could contribute to the mechanisms underlying the chemopreventive effects of NSAIDs. Mol. Carcinog. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Overcoming evasive resistance from vascular endothelial growth factor a inhibition in sarcomas by genetic or pharmacologic targeting of hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α

Increased levels of hypoxia and hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α (HIF‐1α) in human sarcomas correlate with tumor progression and radiation resistance. Prolonged antiangiogenic therapy of tumors not only delays tumor growth but may also increase hypoxia and HIF‐1α activity. In our recent clinical trial, treatment with the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A) antibody, bevacizumab, followed by a combination of bevacizumab and radiation led to near complete necrosis in nearly half of sarcomas. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of microarrays from pretreatment biopsies found that the Gene Ontology category “Response to hypoxia” was upregulated in poor responders and that the hierarchical clustering based on 140 hypoxia‐responsive genes reliably separated poor responders from good responders. The most commonly used chemotherapeutic drug for sarcomas, doxorubicin (Dox), was recently found to block HIF‐1α binding to DNA at low metronomic doses. In four sarcoma cell lines, HIF‐1α shRNA or Dox at low concentrations blocked HIF‐1α induction of VEGF‐A by 84–97% and carbonic anhydrase 9 by 83–93%. HT1080 sarcoma xenografts had increased hypoxia and/or HIF‐1α activity with increasing tumor size and with anti‐VEGF receptor antibody (DC101) treatment. Combining DC101 with HIF‐1α shRNA or metronomic Dox had a synergistic effect in suppressing growth of HT1080 xenografts, at least in part via induction of tumor endothelial cell apoptosis. In conclusion, sarcomas respond to increased hypoxia by expressing HIF‐1α target genes that may promote resistance to antiangiogenic and other therapies. HIF‐1α inhibition blocks this evasive resistance and augments destruction of the tumor vasculature.     

Synergy between peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ agonist and radiotherapy in cancer

Angiogenesis and inflammation are crucial processes through which the tumor microenvironment (TME) influences tumor progression. In this study, we showed that peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is not only expressed in CT26 and 4T1 tumor cell lines but also in cells of TME, including endothelial cells and tumor‐associated macrophages (TAM). In addition, we showed that rosiglitazone may induce tumor vessel normalization and reduce TAM infiltration. Additionally, 4T1 and CT26 tumor‐bearing mice treated with rosiglitazone in combination with radiotherapy showed a significant reduction in lesion size and lung metastasis. We reported that a single dose of 12 Gy irradiation strongly inhibits local tumor angiogenesis. Secretion of C‐C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) in response to local irradiation facilitates the recruitment of migrating CD11b⁺ myeloid monocytes and TAM to irradiated sites that initiate vasculogenesis and enable tumor recurrence after radiotherapy. We found that rosiglitazone partially decreases CCL2 secretion by tumor cells and reduces the infiltration of CD11b⁺ myeloid monocytes and TAM to irradiated tumors, thereby delaying tumor regrowth after radiotherapy. Therefore, combination of the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone with radiotherapy enhances the effectiveness of radiotherapy to improve local tumor control, decrease distant metastasis risks and delay tumor recurrence.     

Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Human Interleukin-1β Alone and in Combination with Natural Human Tumor Necrosis Factor-α

In order to investigate the antitumor effect of recombinant human interleukin-1β (IL-1β) alone and in combination with natural human tumor necrosis factor-α (nHuTNF-α), we used female BDF₁ mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL). IL-1β showed an antiproliferative effect against pulmonary metastatic tumors of 3LL in a dose-dependent manner. We observed 19.6 ± 6.6, 18.6 ± 5.3, 14.1 ± 4.4 and 13.0 ± 6.0 metastatic tumors at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0 μg IL-1β/mouse/day by daily intravenous administration (the number of metastatic tumors of the control group was 26.3 ± 8.2). Similar results were obtained by intraperitoneal administration, but in this case, mice showed a marked decrease of body weight. When IL-1β was administered in combination with nHuTNF-α, pulmonary metastatic tumors decreased much more than when IL-1β was administered alone. When the control group had 18.6 ± 12.7 metastatic tumors, the nHuTNF-α group had 12.3 ± 3.9 and the IL-1β group had 12.8 ± 8.0, the group which was administered both cytokines had a significantly decreased number of 5.6 ± 3.3 metastatic tumors. This antiproliferative effect of IL-1β in combination with nHuTNF-α was reduced by the intravenous administration of anti-asialo GM₁ antibody and carrageenan. The number of metastatic tumors was increased from 8.9 ± 8.0 to 18.8 ± 11.4 by anti-asialo GM₁ antibody and from 9.5 ± 6.8 to 28.0 ± 12.3 by carrageenan. It was suggested that asialo GM₁-positive cells and macrophage were two of the most important effectors of the antiproliferative effect of IL-1β and TNF-α.     

Opposing effects of HIF1α and HIF2α on chromaffin cell phenotypic features and tumor cell proliferation: Insights from MYC‐associated factor X

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are catecholamine‐producing chromaffin cell tumors with diverse phenotypic features reflecting mutations in numerous genes, including MYC‐associated factor X (MAX). To explore whether phenotypic differences among PPGLs reflect a MAX‐mediated mechanism and opposing influences of hypoxia‐inducible factor (HIF)s HIF2α and HIF1α, we combined observational investigations in PPGLs and gene‐manipulation studies in two pheochromocytoma cell lines. Among PPGLs from 140 patients, tumors due to MAX mutations were characterized by gene expression profiles and intermediate phenotypic features that distinguished these tumors from other PPGLs, all of which fell into two expression clusters: one cluster with low expression of HIF2α and mature phenotypic features and the other with high expression of HIF2α and immature phenotypic features due to mutations stabilizing HIFs. Max‐mutated tumors distributed to a distinct subcluster of the former group. In cell lines lacking Max, re‐expression of the gene resulted in maturation of phenotypic features and decreased cell cycle progression. In cell lines lacking Hif2α, overexpression of the gene led to immature phenotypic features, failure of dexamethasone to induce differentiation and increased proliferation. HIF1α had opposing actions to HIF2α in both cell lines, supporting evolving evidence of their differential actions on tumorigenic processes via a MYC/MAX‐related pathway. Requirement of a fully functional MYC/MAX complex to facilitate differentiation explains the intermediate phenotypic features in tumors due to MAX mutations. Overexpression of HIF2α in chromaffin cell tumors due to mutations affecting HIF stabilization explains their proliferative features and why the tumors fail to differentiate even when exposed locally to adrenal steroids.     

Epigenetic modulation of the retinoid X receptor α by green tea in the azoxymethane‐ApcMin/+ mouse model of intestinal cancer

We investigated the possible mechanisms of inhibition of colorectal carcinogenesis by green tea (GT) in azoxymethane‐treated (AOM) Apc^Min/+ mice. Mice received water or a 0.6% (w/v) solution of GT as the only source of beverage. GT treatment commenced at the 8th week of age and lasted for 8 wk. The treatment caused a statistically significant reduction in the number of newly formed tumors (28%, P < 0.05). Immunohistochemical analysis showed that GT decreased the levels of β‐catenin and its downstream target cyclin D1. To probe a mechanism, we further investigated the expression of retinoic X receptor alpha (RXRα) in AOM/Apc^Min/+ tumors. Our results show that RXRα is selectively downregulated in AOM/Apc^Min/+ mouse intestinal tumors. In contrast, other retinoic receptors including retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα), RARβ, RXRβ, and RXRγ were all expressed in Apc^Min/+ adenomas. Furthermore, our results show that RXRα downregulation is an early event in colorectal carcinogenesis and is independent of β‐catenin expression. GT significantly increased the protein levels of RXRα. In addition, RT‐PCR analysis showed that GT induced a similar increase in the levels of RXRα mRNA. Genomic bisulfite treatment of colonic DNA followed by pyrosequencing of 24 CpG sites in the promoter region of RXRα gene showed a significant decrease in CpG methylation with GT treatment. The results suggest that a low concentration of GT is sufficient to desilence RXRα and inhibit intestinal tumorigenesis in the Apc^Min/+ mouse. Mol. Carcinog. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Rho GDP‐dissociation inhibitor α is a potential prognostic biomarker and controls telomere regulation in colorectal cancer

Rho GDP‐dissociation inhibitor α (RhoGDIα) is an essential regulator for Rho GTPases. Although RhoGDIα may serve as an oncogene in colorectal cancer (CRC), the underlying mechanism is still unclear. We investigated the function, mechanism, and clinical significance of RhoGDIα in CRC progression. We founded that downregulation of RhoGDIα repressed CRC cell proliferation, motility, and invasion. Overexpression of RhoGDIα increased DNA damage response signals at telomeres, and led to telomere shortening in CRC cells, also being validated in 26 pairs of CRC tissues. Mechanistic studies revealed that RhoGDIα could promote telomeric repeat factor 1 (TRF1) expression through the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase–protein kinase B signal pathway. Moreover, RhoGDIα protein levels were strongly correlated with TRF1 in CRC tissues. A cohort of 297 CRC samples validated the positive relationship between RhoGDIα and TRF1, and revealed that RhoGDIα and TRF1 levels were negatively associated with CRC patients' survival. Taken together, our results suggest that RhoGDIα regulate TRF1 and telomere length and may be novel prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer.     

Insights on distinct pathways of thiazolidinediones (PPARγ ligand)‐promoted apoptosis in TRAIL‐sensitive or ‐resistant malignant urothelial cells

Thiazolidinediones, including rosiglitazone and troglitazone, are insulin‐sensitizing drugs and high‐affinity ligands for the peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor γ (PPARγ). Apart from their antidiabetic activity, these molecules possess antitumor properties. We investigated their potential apoptotic effects on RT4 (derived from a well‐differentiated Grade I papillary tumor) and T24 (derived from an undifferentiated Grade III carcinoma) bladder cancer cells. Rosiglitazone induced G2/M or G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest in RT4 and T24 cells, respectively. Only troglitazone triggered apoptosis via extrinsic and intrinsic pathways in both cell lines. Interestingly, rosiglitazone amplified TRAIL‐induced apoptosis in TRAIL‐sensitive RT4 cells or let TRAIL‐resistant T24 cells to respond to TRAIL. Thiazolidinediones acted through PPARγ activation‐independent mechanisms. The underlying mechanisms involved for the first time in cancer cells the upregulation of soluble and/or membrane‐bound TRAIL. This was associated with increased cell surface death receptor 5 expression and c‐FLIP and survivin downregulation, mediated in part through proteasome‐dependent degradation in troglitazone‐promoted cell death. Therefore, the combination of rosiglitazone and TRAIL could be clinically relevant as chemopreventive or therapeutic agents for the treatment of TRAIL‐resistant high‐grade urothelial cancers.