双面复合补片在腹壁切口疝修补术中的应用

目的探讨复合补片治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法回顾性分析我院2004年1月至2008年9月间6例腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。结果应用BardComposixMesh和BardComposixKugel补片行腹腔内修补6例。术后所有患者均顺利恢复,局部感觉良好,未发生切口感染、皮下血清肿、肠梗阻、窦道形成和肠瘘,随访6～48个月,无1例复发。结论应用双面复合补片腹腔内置入修补切口疝是一种安全、有效、可靠的治疗腹壁切口疝的方法。     

双层聚丙烯补片在腹壁切口疝修补中的应用

目的探讨应用人工合成材料双层聚丙烯补片修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法 21例腹壁切口疝（15例大切口疝和及6例巨大切口疝）患者采用双层聚丙烯补片行无张力修补,对术中及术后情况进行分析。结果全组病例手术顺利,手术时间87～189min,平均123min。无严重并发症发生,痊愈出院。术后随访5～36个月（平均17个月）,无复发病例。结论双层聚丙烯补片修补中下腹壁大切口疝及巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法 ,是临床上治疗切口疝可供选择的一种手术方式。     

巴德补片修补腹壁切口疝的应用与护理

采用人工合成材料行无张力疝修术是我国近几年来发展起来的一种有效治疗方法。我科自2001年元月-2004年12月对24例腹壁切口疝采用巴德补片行疝修补术,取得满意效果。现将有关护理报告如下:1临床资料1.1一般资料:本组24例中,男性10例,女性14例,年龄在57~77岁,平均年龄67岁。前次手术方法如下:上腹部手术7例(胆道手术5例,脾切除1例,肝右叶切除1例)。下腹部手术17例(子宫切除术5例,前列腺摘除1例,肠切肠吻合术4例,膀胱部分切除术1例,剖腹探查术2例,阑尾切除术4例);复发性疝6例,其中3例为2次手术失败复发。复发时间:最短为3个月,最长11年。1.2治…     

Kugel^TM补片在腹壁疝修补中的应用

目的探讨Kugel补片在腹壁疝治疗中的效果。方法总结2004年1月至2007年1月应用Kugel补片治疗的97个病例的临床资料。结果手术时间缩短30％，住院天数少于10d，术后不良反应少，复发率为1．03％。结论使用Kugel补片的修补术是一种微创、高效的手术。可以使用肌后腹膜前修补的方法（stoppa技术）进行腹壁疝的修补。     

人工补片修补腹壁切口疝35例临床疗效分析

目的:探讨利用人工材料修补腹壁切口疝的疗效.方法:回顾性分析我院2000～2008年间收治的35例病人的临床资料.结果:所有病例均采用人工补片行切口疝无张力修补术,均痊愈出院,无严重并发症.随访6～60个月,平均28个月,无复发,疗效满意.结论:应用人工补片行腹壁切口疝修补术是一种安全、合理、疗效确切的治疗方法,也是治疗该病的发展方向.     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

复合补片修补腹壁切口疝四例

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见的并发症,疝修补手术的难度、并发症和复发率都较高[1-2]。我科对4例腹壁切口疝患者采用复合型补片行腹腔内无张力修补术。     

疝网补片在腹壁切口疝中的应用

本院自2003年2月～2004年10月应用疝网补片修补腹壁切口疝46例，效果满意，现报告如下。     

无张力修补术在腹壁疝中的应用

目的探讨腹壁疝的无张力补片修补方法,总结腹壁疝的治疗经验。方法回顾性分析我科2004年10月至2008年11月间收治的25例腹壁疝患者的临床资料。24例手术采用全麻或硬膜外麻醉下的腹膜外补片无张力修补术。1例应用巴德CK补片,置于腹腔内。结果本组患者中,男性9例,女性16例;年龄37～81岁,平均年龄（68±10）岁。其中白线疝1例,半月环疝1例,脐疝6例,切口疝17例。腹壁切口疝疝环直径1～18cm,平均（7±4）em。均采用无张力疝修补术,平均手术时间（116±42）min。平均住院时间（8±3）d。术后1例发生轻微疼痛不适;术后2例发生浆液肿,经穿刺治愈;1例发生上呼吸道感染;随访6～48个月,无复发。结论采用人工补片行腹壁疝无张力修补术是一种安全可靠的手术方式,采用腹膜外修补方式进行手术,避免了补片与腹腔内脏器的直接接触,并发症少,复发率低。     

补片上置修补术治疗腹壁切口疝18例体会

目的探讨补片上置修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的效果。方法对18例腹壁切口疝患者采取补片上置修补术治疗,回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果 18例患者均成功完成手术。手术时间90~120 min,术后住院时间9~12 d。未发生切口感染及补片排异反应等并发症,均痊愈出院。随访1~3 a,无复发病例,患者无不适感觉,疗效满意。结论加强围手术期处理,采用补片上置修补术治疗腹壁切口疝,操作简单易掌握、费用低廉、近期并发症少、远期复发率低,效果肯定,是治疗腹壁切口疝的合理术式。     

Reconstruction of the abdominal wall for incisional hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall reconstruction with mobilization of autologous tissue has evolved as a reliable option for patients with incisional hernias. METHODS: With the aim of evaluating morbidity and recurrence rates in patients who underwent abdominal wall reconstruction for incisional hernia repair, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 188 patients treated between 1996 and 2003. RESULTS: Primary approximation of the fascial defect was achieved in 77% and was reinforced by either mesh placement or rectus muscle advancement. The remaining 23% were reconstructed either by mesh placement, components separation, or distant flap mobilization. Median follow-up was 15 months. Overall morbidity rate was 38%; recurrence rate was 13%. Dimensions of the hernia and intraoperative enterotomies were associated with postoperative complications. Lack of complete restoration of the myofascial abdominal wall continuity was associated with recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incisional hernias, techniques involving autologous tissue mobilization are safe and associated with low recurrence rates.     

比较腹腔镜腹腔内与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术治疗腹壁切口疝的效果

目的比较腹腔镜腹腔内补片置入术(IPOM)与开放腹膜前间隙补片置入术(Sublay)治疗腹壁切口疝的效果。方法选取2016-01—2019-01间在郑州大学第一附属医院接受疝修补术治疗的76例腹壁切口疝患者,将36例行腹腔镜IPOM术的患者作为腔镜组。将40例行开放Sublay术的患者作为开放组。回顾性分析患者的临床资料。结果2组患者均成功完成手术。2组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腔镜组术中出血量、术后肠蠕动恢复时间及住院时间均少于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。腔镜组术后近期疼痛发生率低于开放组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其余并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜IPOM术具有创伤小、恢复快、疼痛轻、出血少、并发症少等优点,具有更广阔的应用前景。     

腹壁切口疝无张力修补术及围手术期处理

【摘要】 目的 总结采用人工材料无张力修补腹壁切口疝的临床经验和方法,探讨人工材料置于腹壁不同的层次对疗效的影响及围手术期处理。方法 回顾性分析90例腹壁切口疝的手术方法、 围手术期处理、术后并发症、引流的放置及随访结果。结果 90例患者疝补术后恢复顺利,无严重并发症, 无术后死亡。1例发生切口红肿伴脂肪液化,1例因脂肪液化再次复发。结论 采用人工材料行无张力疝修补是合适的治疗腹壁切口疝的方法,人工材料置于腹壁不同层次均可取得良好疗效,良好的围手术期处理是疗效的重要保证。     

�޴󸹱��п���24��Χ�����ڴ������

目的探讨巨大腹壁切口疝的临床特点及围手术期的处理经验。方法分析2001年5月至2003年7月南京军区南京总医院收治的24例巨大腹壁切口疝病人的临床资料。结果24例中12例有明显的腹内压增高病因，24例均使用人工合成高分子材料修补，术后腹带加压包扎2周，预防性使用抗生素，引流积液和血液：引流管多在3-5d拔除。术后经鼻导管给氧4例，经面罩给氧6例，气管插管接呼吸机正压辅助呼吸11例。结论腹壁巨大切口疝应加强围手术期处理，尤其是呼吸功能的监测和维护，以确保手术的安全：     

Sublay法无张力修补术在老年人腹壁切口疝中的应用

目的 探讨Sublay法无张力修补术在老年人腹壁切口疝手术治疗中的疗效。方法 回顾性分析江门市人民医院2004年1月至2010年2月采用Sublay法无张力修补术治疗的32例老年腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。结果 32例患者手术均顺利完成,手术时间53～112min,平均72min。术后发生肺部感染2例,泌尿系感染2例,经保守治疗后均痊愈。术后未发生切口感染、积液、积血以及肠梗阻。所有患者均治愈出院。随访时间13～73个月,平均38.5个月,无一例复发。结论 Sublay法无张力修补术术后并发症少,复发率低,是治疗老年人腹壁切口疝的可靠方法。     

巨大腹壁切口疝无张力修补术的临床体会

【摘要】 目的 总结巨大腹壁切口疝无张力修补手术的临床经验。方法 回顾性分析2006年12月至2011年12月我科收治的53例巨大腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料。结果 所有病例均采用聚丙烯网片行巨大切口疝无张力修补术。术后除出现4例切口皮下积液,5例切口感染, 3例低蛋白血症,2例伤口活动性渗血致切口延迟愈合外,其余患者均顺利恢复,痊愈出院。平均住院时间9.5 d。本组病例均得到随访,随访时间1~5年,无复发,疗效满意。结论 应用人工补片行腹壁巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全可靠,疗效确切的治疗方法,采用SUBLAY修补法的改良方法挤接法(Bridge)进行手术,并发症少,复发率低,有利于提高手术成功率。     

Giant pseudocyst of the anterior abdominal wall following mesh repair of incisional hernia: a rare complication managed laparoscopically.

Giant pseudocyst formation of the anterior abdominal wall, following on-lay polypropylene mesh repair for incisional hernia is an under reported complication. We report an unusual case of a 56-year-old female who underwent a polypropylene mesh repair of incisional hernia 2 years back. Subsequently she developed a giant pseudocyst of the anterior abdominal wall, which was occupying the whole of the abdomen from the xiphisternum to the pubic bone, and over both the flanks. Over a period of one year, the cyst had defied multiple attempts at aspiration. The patient underwent a laparoscopic drainage of the collection with piecemeal excision of the entire cyst wall. Histopathology of the cyst wall revealed necrotic material with intervening areas of hemorrhage. No epithelial lining was seen. There has been no recurrence in the two years of follow-up. Conclusion: giant pseudocyst of the anterior abdominal wall is a rare complication following mesh repair of an incisional hernia. Such pseudocysts can be managed successfully by laparoscopic procedures.     

Functional impairment and complaints following incisional hernia repair with different polypropylene meshes

The influence of mesh material on the clinical outcome of hernia repair has often been neglected, although recent studies have clearly demonstrated the importance of mesh properties for integration in the abdominal wall. Of particular significance are the amount of mesh material and the pore size. In the following study, patients received different mesh types with distinct amounts of polypropylene and of various pore sizes for incisional hernia repair. We investigated whether the type of material influenced the clinical and functional outcomes. Between 1991 and 1999, 235 patients received polypropylene meshes in a sublay position for incisional hernia repair: 115 patients were implanted with a Marlex heavy-weight mesh (Mhw mesh), 37 patients with an Atrium heavy-weight mesh (Ahw mesh) and 83 with a Vypro low-weight mesh (Vlw mesh). The study protocol included ultrasound examination and 3D-stereography in all patients, with a total follow-up of 24±13 months (Mhw-mesh), 11±8 months (Ahw-mesh) and 8±7 months (Vlw-mesh). Our findings demonstrate that the side effects of mesh implantation, comprising paraesthesia and restriction of abdominal wall mobility, were significantly affected by the type of material implanted. Three-dimensional stereographic examinations were well in accordance with our clinical findings. Our data support the hypothesis that the use of low-weight large-pore meshes is advantageous for abdominal wall function. Electronic Publication     

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach to place a polypropylene mesh on the abdominal wall: an experimental swine model of a technique that can be used for incisional hernia repair

Background The placement of intraabdominal polypropylene mesh entails risks of adhesions and fistulas that can be avoided by preperitoneal placement.Methods This comparative, open, experimental, prospective, randomized, and transversal study randomized pigs into two groups of 11 each for intraperitoneal (IPOM) or preperitoneal (TAPP) polypropylene mesh placement by laparoscopy. Diagnostic laparoscopy and tissue en-bloc resection was performed 28 days postoperatively for histopathologic analysis.Results The following data were observed for the two study groups: surgical time (IPOM: 35.73 ± 4.22 min; TAPP: 58.09 ± 6.28 min; p = <0.0001); adhesions (IPOM: 81.81%; TAPP: 27.27%; p = 0.032), grade III for IPOM and grade II for TAPP (p = 0.001); and interloop adhesions (IPOM: 81.81%; TAPP: 9.09%; p = 0.003). No fistulas were found in either group. The TAPP procedure showed better integration of mesh, without lesion to abdominal organs. Two complications, occurred with IPOM, and one with TAPP (p = 1.0, not significant).Conclusions The perperitoneal technique requires more time, but has fewer adhesions and less intraabdominal inflammatory response. It is a feasible technique that may diminish risks in the laparoscopic treatment of incisional hernias with polypropylene mesh.     

腹腔镜下腹腔内网片植入法和开放式肌后筋膜前补片修补法治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效比较

【摘要】 目的〓比较腹腔镜下腹腔内网片植入法(IPOM)和开放式肌后筋膜前补片修补法(Sublay)治疗腹壁切口疝的疗效。方法〓回顾性分析30例腹腔镜应用IPOM法和28例开放式应用Sublay法治疗腹壁切口疝的病例,比较其手术疗效及术后患者生活质量。结果〓两组手术时间、平均住院时间、术中出血量及术后并发症比较,腹腔镜组均明显优于开放手术组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论〓应用腹腔镜行IPOM治疗腹壁巨大切口疝安全可行,具有有创伤小,住院时间短,恢复快,术后并发症少的优点。