The ketosis-resistance in fibro-calculous-pancreatic-diabetes. 1. Clinical observations and endocrine-metabolic measurements during oral glucose tolerance test.

We measured circulating levels of C-peptide, pancreatic glucagon, cortisol, growth hormone and metabolites (glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, glycerol and 3-hydroxybutyrate) in fibro-calculous-pancreatic diabetic (FCPD, n = 28), insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM, n = 28) and non-diabetic control (n = 27) subjects during an oral glucose tolerance test. There was no difference in the two diabetic groups in age (FCPD 24 +/- 2, IDDM 21 +/- 2 years, mean +/- SEM), BMI (FCPD 16.0 +/- 0.6, IDDM 15.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2), triceps skinfold thickness (FCPD 8 +/- 1, IDDM 7 +/- 1 mm), glycaemic status (fasting plasma glucose, FCPD 12.5 +/- 1.5, IDDM 14.5 +/- 1.2 mmol/l), fasting plasma C-peptide (FCPD 0.13 +/- 0.03, IDDM 0.08 +/- 0.01 nmol/l), peak plasma C-peptide during OGTT (FCPD 0.36 +/- 0.10, IDDM 0.08 +/- 0.03 nmol/l) and fasting plasma glucagon (FCPD 35 +/- 4, IDDM 37 +/- 4 ng/l). FCPD patients, however, showed lower circulating concentrations of non-esterified fatty acids (0.73 +/- 0.11 mmol/l), glycerol (0.11 +/- 0.02 mmol/l) and 3-hydroxybutyrate (0.15 +/- 0.03 mmol/l) compared to IDDM patients (1.13 +/- 0.14, 0.25 +/- 0.05 and 0.29 +/- 0.08 mmol/l, respectively). This could be due to enhanced sensitivity of adipose tissue lipolysis to the suppressive action of circulating insulin and possibly also to insensitivity of hepatic ketogenesis to glucagon. Our results also demonstrate preservation of alpha-cell function in FCPD patients when beta-cell function is severely diminished, suggesting a more selective beta-cell dysfunction or destruction than hitherto believed.     

Glucagon-glucose (GG) test for the estimation of the insulin reserve in diabetes.

The residual B-cell function was examined by means of the plasma C-peptide response 6 min after a combined injection of glucagon and glucose (GG test) or conventional glucagon test (G test) in four insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM group), in 18 diabetic patients treated with insulin (Insulin group), 31 treated with oral hypoglycemic agents (SU group) and 27 treated with diet only (Diet group) and in 22 borderline cases. By GG test, 6-min C-peptide values of the IDDM group were 0.27 +/- 0.05 nM (n = 4) and were significantly lower than those of the Insulin group (0.89 +/- 0.09 nM, n = 12), the SU group (1.42 +/- 0.10 nM, n = 13), the Diet group (2.47 +/- 0.22 nM, n = 11) and the borderline cases (3.38 +/- 0.22 nM, n = 11). Patients with a 6-min C-peptide concentration below 0.75 nM by GG test appeared to be insulin-requiring patients. In the G test, plasma C-peptide concentrations at 6 min were 0.35 +/- 0.08 nM in the IDDM group (n = 2), 0.72 +/- 0.20 nM in the Insulin group (n = 7), 1.08 +/- 0.09 nM in the SU group (n = 20), 1.40 +/- 0.19 nM in the Diet group (n = 17) and 2.05 +/- 0.21 nM in the borderline cases (n = 12). Some of the Diet group patients showed extremely low C-peptide responses. When comparing the GG test and G test in individual cases, a greater C-peptide response was seen with the GG test in all cases except for IDDM patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Relationships among islet cell antibodies, residual beta-cell function, and metabolic control in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus of long duration: use of a sensitive C-peptide radioimmunoassay

Relationships among islet cell antibodies (ICA), residual beta-cell function, and metabolic control were studied in 60 insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDs) of long duration (6 to 31 years). Sensitive C-peptide immunoreactivity (CPR) and ICA assays with limits of 0.017 nmol/L and 5 Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (JDF) U, respectively, demonstrated that baseline (0.16 +/- 0.02 nmol/L, mean +/- SE, n = 26), as well as maximum CPR values (0.34 +/- 0.05 nmol/L), during 100-g oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) in ICA-positive IDDs were significantly higher than corresponding values in ICA-negative ones (baseline values, 0.10 +/- 0.01 nmol/L, P less than .05; maximum values, 0.20 +/- 0.04 nmol/L, P less than .01, n = 34). Negative correlation was observed between increment of serum CPR and metabolic control indices, including fasting blood glucose (FBG) and HbA1c levels (P less than .05). In addition, ICA-positive insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients had lower values of FBG (8.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/L, P less than .01 v ICA-negative IDDs) and HbA1c (9.2% +/- 0.2%, P less than .05 v ICA-negative IDDs) than ICA-negative ones (FBG, 9.9 +/- 0.4 mmol/L; HbA1c, 9.8% +/- 0.2%). These results indicate that minute CPR responses to OGTT detected by sensitive methods may represent residual pancreatic beta cells, which may contribute to ICA generation and good metabolic control in IDDs of long duration.     

Estimation of B-cell function by the urinary excretion rate of C-peptide in diabetic patients: comparison with C-peptide response to glucagon and to a mixed meal

This study examined the relationship between the C-peptide response to intravenous glucagon and mixed meal stimulation and the 24 h urinary excretion rate of C-peptide and its urinary excretion during the glucagon test in nine control subjects, eighteen Type 1 (insulin-dependent) and twenty-two Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Compared to controls (61.0 +/- 7.1 micrograms), the 24-h urine excretion rate of C-peptide was 8.2 +/- 3.1 micrograms (p less than 0.001) in Type 1 and 89.8 +/- 12.9 micrograms (p = NS) in Type 2 diabetic patients. C-peptide urinary excretion rate during the glucagon test was 6.92 +/- 1.11 micrograms, 0.42 +/- 0.10 microgram (p less than 0.001) and 6.47 +/- 1.13 micrograms (p = NS) respectively. Fasting serum C-peptide values were 1.53 +/- 0.16 ng/ml in controls, 0.42 +/- 0.09 ng/ml in Type 1 (p less than 0.0001) and 2.08 +/- 0.22 ng/ml in Type 2 diabetics (p = NS); C-peptide areas under the curve after glucagon stimulation were, respectively, 241.6 +/- 20.3 ng/ml, 29.2 +/- 5.9 ng/ml (p less than 0.0001) and 170.9 +/- 17.9 ng/ml (p less than 0.03) and after the meal test they were 204.7 +/- 15.6, 68.7 +/- 19.8 ng/ml (p less than 0.0001) and 265.5 +/- 32.9 ng/ml (p = NS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of porcine gastric inhibitory polypeptide on beta-cell function in type I and type II diabetes mellitus

The effect of highly purified natural porcine GIP on C-peptide release was examined in six type I (insulin-dependent) diabetics (IDD) with residual beta-cell function, six type II non-insulin-dependent) diabetics (NIDD), and six normal subjects. All subjects were normal weight. From -120 minutes to 180 minutes glucose or insulin was infused IV to achieve a constant plasma glucose level of 8 mmol/L. On two separate days GIP (2 pmol/kg/min) or isotonic NaCl at random were infused from 0 to 30 minutes. After 10 minutes of GIP infusion plasma IR-GIP concentrations were in the physiologic postprandial range. At 30 minutes a further increase in IR-GIP to supraphysiologic levels occurred. In all subjects plasma, C-peptide increased more after 10 minutes of GIP infusion (IDD, 0.48 +/- 0.05; NIDD, 0.79 +/- 0.11; normal subjects, 2.27 +/- 0.29 nmol/L) than on the corresponding day with NaCl infusion (IDD, 0.35 +/- 0.03; NIDD, 0.62 +/- 0.08; normal subjects, 1.22 +/- 0.13 nmol/L, P less than .05 for all). The responses of the diabetics were significantly lower than that of the normal subjects (P less than .001 for both groups). No further increase in C-peptide occurred during the remaining 20 minutes of the GIP infusion in the diabetic subjects (IDD, 0.49 +/- 0.05; NIDD, 0.83 +/- 0.10 nmol/L). In the presence of a plasma glucose concentration of 8 mmol/L, physiologic concentrations of porcine GIP caused an immediate but impaired beta-cell response in IDD and NIDD patients.     

Beta-cell secretory function and CD25 + lymphocyte subsets in the early stage of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Cellular immunologic tests have not been used for diagnostic purposes in individuals at risk for autoimmune insulitis or in patients with partial beta-cell destruction because of a lack of studies that show their predictive value. In this study we initially evaluated 43 patients with recent-onset Type 1 diabetes (disease duration 相似文献   

C-peptide response to oral glucose and its clinical role in elderly people.

C-Peptide response to oral glucose was measured in 45 elderly diabetics, in whom final treatment was established on clinical grounds during a 16-18 months follow-up. The diabetic patients comprised 19 ultimately classified as insulin-dependent (IDD) (group 1) and 26 regarded as non-insulin-dependent (NIDD) (group 2). Fifteen matched controls (group 3) and 15 young controls (group 4) were similarly studied. Fasting C-peptide values were lower in groups 1 and 2 (1.48 +/- 0.39 and 2.14 +/- 0.22 ng/ml; mean +/- SEM, respectively) compared with groups 3 and 4 (2.51 +/- 0.16 and 2.71 +/- 0.20 ng/ml, respectively) (p less than 0.001). Peak C-peptide levels were reached at 30 min in healthy young and at 60 min in healthy elderly. All non-diabetic control subjects showed a peak of at least 6.5 ng/ml and an increment of at least 4 ng/ml. The ratio of C-peptide increment/blood glucose increment (100 delta CP/delta BG) at 60 min derived to assess beta-cell function was at least 90 in all healthy subjects. The ratio was less than 10 in 68% of IDD but in only 27% of NIDD patients (p less than 0.01). The 100 delta CP/delta BG was inversely related to the prevailing fasting blood glucose (FBG) (p less than 0.001). These findings suggest that C-peptide response to oral glucose may be a useful test in certain elderly diabetic patients whose insulin dependence is in question.     

Nine weeks of bedtime diazoxide is well tolerated and improves beta-cell function in subjects with Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To test whether a bedtime dose of diazoxide can improve daytime beta-cell function without side-effects in Type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A double-blind randomized study was performed in 27 Type 2 diabetic subjects (17 male, 10 female) who were treated with bedtime insulin and metformin. Subjects received either bedtime diazoxide, 100 mg, or placebo for 9 weeks. Duplicate C-peptide glucagon tests were performed before and in the last days of intervention. RESULTS: No side-effects of diazoxide were detected. Treatment with diazoxide did not incur any increase in bedtime insulin. C-peptide responses to glucagon tended to increase: 0.15 +/- 0.06 nmol/l vs. -0.01 +/- 0.04 nmol/l for placebo, P < 0.06 for difference. Corresponding effects on insulin were 66.2 +/- 41.7 pmol/l for diazoxide vs. -84.2 +/- 51.5 for placebo, P < 0.03. Treatment with diazoxide decreased fasting glucagon levels by 41% vs. placebo, P < 0.03. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were not affected, whereas levels of blood glucose post breakfast were higher during diazoxide (1.34 +/- 0.43 mmol/l, P < 0.01 vs. placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Bedtime treatment with diazoxide in Type 2 diabetic subjects on bedtime insulin and metformin has no significant side-effects, does not increase bedtime insulin supplementation, tends to ameliorate beta-cell function but fails to improve metabolic control.     

Insulin requirement in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: relation to simple tests of islet B-cell function and insulin sensitivity

Evaluation of simple tests of islet B-cell function and insulin sensitivity as predictors of metabolic control was performed during 3 months of insulin withdrawal in 25 insulin-treated diabetic subjects. All patients had a glucagon stimulated plasma C-peptide concentration above 0.33 nmol/l and a fasting plasma C-peptide concentration above 0.20 nmol/l a few days before insulin withdrawal. Insulin sensitivity was measured as the glucose disappearance rate (k) during an intravenous insulin tolerance test. Two patients were considered insulin-requiring due to high fasting blood glucose levels (greater than 20 mmol/l) and two patients due to an increase in glycosylated haemoglobin of more than 1.1% (greater than approximately 3SD) in combination with weight loss. None of the remaining patients had a significant increase in glycosylated haemoglobin. An inverse correlation was found between stimulated C-peptide levels and insulin sensitivity (r = 0.41, p less than 0.05). Fasting and stimulated C-peptide concentrations of 0.40 and 0.70 nmol/l, respectively, separated non-insulin-requiring patients from a group consisting of both insulin- and non-insulin-requiring patients. At these C-peptide levels the predictive value of a positive test was 100% while the predictive value of a negative test was as low as 33% or 27% depending on whether fasting or stimulated C-peptide concentration was used. Including the k value in the prediction only increased the predictive values of negative tests to 40% and 33%, respectively.     

Sensitivity and reproducibility of urinary C-peptide as estimate of islet B-cell function in insulin-treated diabetes

The aims of the present study were to evaluate the ability of urinary C-peptide determination to demonstrate presence of residual insulin secretion, and to evaluate the reproducibility of urinary C-peptide excretion in 125 insulin-treated diabetic patients. C-peptide was determined in two consecutive 24-h urine specimens and related to plasma C-peptide 6 min after the intravenous injection of 1 mg glucagon. The detection limit of C-peptide in plasma was defined analytically (greater than or equal to 0.02 nmol l-1) and from pancreatectomized patients (greater than or equal to 0.06 nmol l-1), and in urine only analytically (greater than or equal to 0.1 nmol l-1). If the analytical detection limit of plasma C-peptide was used as indicator of residual insulin secretion, islet B-cell function was preserved in all patients. In patients with stimulated plasma C-peptide levels from 0.02- less than 0.06 nmol l-1 no increase was found in plasma C-peptide values after stimulation with glucagon. This unresponsiveness of islet B-cells is in good agreement with the existence of a biological detection limit of C-peptide in plasma of 0.06 nmol l-1. Using this biological plasma C-peptide detection limit, 49 of 125 patients were without residual insulin secretion. In contrast to this, only 7 patients were diagnosed as C-peptide nonsecretors using the analytical detection limit of urinary C-peptide. Eighty-four per cent of patients considered to have Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes with a duration of diabetes of more than 15 years had detectable C-peptide in the urine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Fasting plasma C-peptide,glucagon stimulated plasma C-peptide,and urinary C-peptide in relation to clinical type of diabetes

Summary Many patients with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus are treated with insulin in order to control hyperglycaemia. We studied fasting plasma C-peptide, glucagon stimulated plasma C-peptide, and 24 h urinary C-peptide in relation to clinical type of diabetes in 132 insulin treated diabetic subjects. Patients were classified clinically as Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects in the presence of at least two of the following criteria: 1) significant ketonuria, 2) insulin treatment started within one year after diagnosis, 3) age of diagnosis 40 years, and 4) weight below 110% of ideal weight of the same age and sex. Eighty patients were classified as Type 1 and 52 as Type 2 diabetic subjects. A second classification of patients into 6 C-peptide classes was then performed. Class I consisted of patients without islet B-cell function. Class II-VI had preserved islet B-cell function and were separated according to the 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% C-peptide percentiles. The two classifications of patients were compared by calculating the prevalence of clinical Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in each of the C-peptide classes. This analysis showed that patients with a fasting plasma C-peptide value <0.20 nmol/l, a glucagon stimulated plasma C-peptide value <0.32 nmol/l, and a urinary C-peptide value <3.1 nmol/l, or <0.54 nmol/mmol creatinine/24 h, or <5.4 nmol/24 h mainly were Type 1 diabetic patients; while patients with C-peptide levels above these values mainly were Type 2. At these limits the percentage, predictive value of positive tests as indicators of Type 2 diabetes were as follows: fasting C-peptide 83%, stimulated C-peptide 86%, and urinary C-peptide expressed as nmol/l 76%, as nmol/mmol creatinine/24 h 79%, and as nmol/24 h 78%. Similarly, the percentage predictive value of negative tests as indicators of Type 1 diabetes were as follows: fasting C-peptide 86%, stimulated C-peptide 88%, and urinary C-peptide expressed as nmol/l 79%, as nmol· mmol creatinine·24 h 81%, and as nmol/24 h 80%. If patients without detectable C-peptide were excluded, the predictive value of negative tests were as follows: fasting C-peptide 81%, stimulated C-peptide 88%, urinary C-peptide expressed as nmol/l 61%, as nmol/mmol creatinine/24 h 69%, and as nmol/24 h 64%. In conclusion, post glucagon C-peptide gives a good distinction between Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus in insulin treated diabetes while 24 h urinary C-peptide gives a less sensitive distinction between the clinical types of diabetes.     

A comparison of serum C-peptide response to intravenous glucagon, and urine C-peptide, as indexes of insulin dependence

Serum C-peptide (SCPR) at fasting and after intravenous injection of glucagon was evaluated in diabetic patients with various degrees of insulin dependence, and compared with 24 h urine C-peptide (UCPR). Fasting SCPR did not differ between healthy subjects and sulfonylurea-treated patients (SU) who were considered to have definite non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM); but was significantly lower in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes (IDDM) (0.24 +/- 0.10 ng/ml in IDDM vs. 1.43 +/- 0.61 ng/ml in SU, P less than 0.001). SCPR reached a peak at 6 min after glucagon injection, except for the IDDM group. The SCPR response at 6 min after 1 mg glucagon injection was significantly lower in the SU (NIDDM) group than in the normal group (2.86 +/- 1.21 v. 4.69 +/- 1.47 ng/ml, P less than 0.001). In the IDDM group, there was no increase of SCPR after glucagon injection. Among diabetic patients, SCPR response to glucagon correlated positively to the amounts of UCPR (P less than 0.001). By analysis of the distribution patterns of SCPR response to intravenous glucagon, SCPR of 1.0 ng/ml and the increment of SCPR of 0.5 ng/ml at 6 min are to be used as cut-off points to differentiate IDDM and NIDDM. These values correspond roughly to the UCPR values below 20 micrograms/day and above 30 micrograms/day, which we previously proposed as indexes to differentiate insulin-dependent and non-insulin-dependent diabetes.     

The effect of various blood glucose levels on post-glucagon C-peptide secretion in type 2 (non insulin-dependent) diabetes.

We investigated how different plasma glucose concentrations could significantly modify the C-peptide response to glucagon. Twenty poorly-controlled (HbA1c 10.2 +/- 1.5%) non insulin-dependent (NIDDM) subjects (body mass index 27 +/- 1.8), 2 treated with diet alone and 18 with oral hypoglycemic agents were studied. The first day glucagon (1 mg iv) was injected, patients being fasting and untreated. Mean plasma glucose levels were 11.4 +/- 1.2 mM. On a second non consecutive day, after an overnight fast, the same patients were connected to a closed-loop insulin infusion system (Betalike, Genoa), their blood glucose concentrations were stabilized within a normoglycemic range (5-5.5 mM) for 2 h and insulin infusion was stopped. The glucagon test was repeated 30 min later. Blood samples were taken 0, 6, 10, 20 min after glucagon injection. In the second test, basal, and 6, 10 and 20 min post-glucagon glucose levels were significantly lower (p less than 0.001); similarly C-peptide concentrations were significantly reduced both in basal conditions (0.55 +/- 0.04 vs 0.37 +/- 0.04 nM; p less than 0.001) and 6 (0.92 +/- 0.06 vs 0.6 +/- 0.06; p less than 0.001), 10 (0.79 +/- 0.06 vs 0.56 +/- 0.06; p less than 0.001) and 20 min (0.64 +/- 0.05 vs 0.44 +/- 0.04; p less than 0.001) after stimulation. The C-peptide secretion area showed the same trend (49.5 +/- 4.8 vs 32.1 +/- 5.8; p less than 0.001). In conclusion, our data confirms that blood glucose levels modulate the pancreatic insulin secretion; glycemic normalization significantly reduced both basal and post-glucagon C-peptide release.     

Serum ketone response to glucagon as a marker of insulin dependency in diabetics.

The serum ketone response to glucagon was measured in 10 patients with IDDM and 37 with NIDDM. In both groups, serum 3-hydroxybutyrate increased significantly after intravenous injection of 1 mg glucagon. The difference between the serum level of 3-hydroxybutyrate at 30 min and basal level [delta 3-OHBA(30')] was 133 +/- 25 mumol/l in the patients with IDDM, 13 +/- 8 mumol/l in those with NIDDM treated by diet alone or with oral hypoglycemic agents and 23 +/- 13 mumol/l in those with NIDDM treated with insulin. The delta 3-OHBA(30') was significantly greater in IDDM patients than in both groups of NIDDM patients (P less than 0.001). The delta 3-OHBA(30') was greater than 87 mumol/l in eighty percent of IDDM patients, but smaller than 87 mumol/l in both groups of NIDDM patients. The delta 3-OHBA(30') was correlated with the difference between the plasma level of C-peptide at 6 min and basal level [delta CPR(6')] (r = -0.540, P less than 0.001). The delta 3-OHBA(30') was not correlated with fasting plasma levels of glucose, fructosamine or hemoglobin A1c. These observations show that measurement of the serum ketone response to glucagon is a useful marker of insulin dependency. In order to determine insulin dependency, the simultaneous measurement of concentrations of ketones and C-peptide is indicated during the glucagon stimulation test.     

Interferon-alpha reduces insulin resistance and beta-cell secretion in responders among patients with chronic hepatitis B and C

This study aimed at elucidating the effects of interferon (IFN)-alpha on glucose metabolism in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C infections. Twenty-eight biopsy-proven patients with chronic hepatitis B (ten cases) and hepatitis C (18 cases) were given IFN-alpha for a total of 24 weeks. The patients received a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glucagon stimulation test, tests for type 1 diabetes-related autoantibodies and an insulin suppression test before and after IFN-alpha therapy. Ten of the 28 patients responded to IFN-alpha therapy. Steady-state plasma glucose of the insulin suppression test decreased significantly in responders (13.32+/-1.48 (S.E.M.) vs 11.33+/-1.19 mmol/l, P=0.0501) but not in non-responders (12.29+/-1.24 vs 11.11+/-0.99 mmol/l, P=0.2110) immediately after completion of IFN-alpha treatment. In the oral glucose tolerance test, no significant difference was observed in plasma glucose in either responders (10.17+/-0.23 vs 10.03+/-0.22 mmol/l) or non-responders (10.11+/-0.22 vs 9.97+/-0.21 mmol/l) 3 Months after completion of IFN-alpha treatment. However, significant differences were noted in C-peptide in both responders (2.90+/-0.13 vs 2.20+/-0.09 nmol/l, P=0.0040) and non-responders (2.45+/-0.11 vs 2.22+/-0.08 nmol/l, P=0.0287) before vs after treatment. The changes of C-peptide in an OGTT between responders and non-responders were also significantly different (P=0.0028), with responders reporting a greater reduction in C-peptide. No case developed autoantibodies during the treatment. In patients who were successfully treated with IFN-alpha, insulin sensitivity improved and their plasma glucose stayed at the same level without secreting as much insulin from islet beta-cells.     

Insulin and C-peptide responses to 75 g oral glucose load in the healthy man

Plasma insulin and C-peptide levels in the fasting state and after a 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in a large number of healthy subjects are reported. 247 volunteers (134 males, 113 females), aged 13-69 years, who had a negative history of diabetes, no history of significant disease, normal physical examination, normal body weight, normal glucose tolerance, normal blood tests, and who were taking no drugs were studied. Results, mean +/- SEM (range): fasting glucose concentration = 4.64 +/- 0.03 mmol/l (3.10 - 6.10), 1-h glucose concentration = 5.23 +/- 0.10 mmol/l (2.20 - 9.90), 2-h glucose concentration = 4.11 +/- 0.06 mmol/l (2.00 - 6.80); fasting insulin level = 0.088 +/- 0.002 nmol/l (0.03 - 0.28), 1-h insulin level = 0.45 +/- 0.01 nmol/l (0.06 - 1.63), 2-h insulin level = 0.24 +/- 0.01 nmol/l (0.05 - 1.12); fasting C-peptide concentration = 0.60 +/- 0.01 nmol/l (0.14 - 1.34), 1-h C-peptide concentration = 2.17 +/- 0.05 (0.63 - 8.56), 2-h C-peptide concentration = 1.77 +/- 0.04 nmol/(0.35 - 5.74). Fasting insulin and fasting C-peptide concentrations correlated to post-glucose insulin and C-peptide concentrations, respectively. At each sampling-point insulin concentration correlated to C-peptide concentration. After glucose ingestion, both insulin and C-peptide plasma levels correlated significantly with the corresponding glucose levels. During fasting, C-peptide but no insulin level correlated to glucose level.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Insulin resistance following nocturnal hypoglycaemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Glucose metabolism was studied by a somatostatin-insulin-glucose infusion test (SIGIT) for 8 h in 7 male patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. They were investigated on two occasions in random order, with and without preceding hypoglycaemia induced between 3.00 and 4.00 h. SIGIT was started at 7.00 h when blood glucose was restored to normal and the counterregulatory hormones had returned to basal values. As expected, hypoglycaemia evoked an enhancement of the plasma levels of GH (43.7 +/- 10.1 vs 4.4 +/- 1.8 micrograms/l), cortisol (690 +/- 59 vs 140 +/- 32 nmol/l), glucagon (225 +/- 35 vs 143 +/- 25 ng/l), and epinephrine (3.80 +/- 1.00 vs 0.10 +/- 0.03 nmol/l). During the SIGIT, the levels of circulating free insulin and counterregulatory hormones were similar in the two tests notwithstanding that excessive hyperglycaemia appeared when SIGIT was preceded by hypoglycaemia. The present study thus demonstrates that nocturnal hypoglycaemia induces insulin resistance in insulin-dependent diabetic patients not deprived of insulin.     

Serum C-peptide concentrations and their value in evaluating the usefulness of insulin therapy in elderly diabetics

Serum C-peptide concentrations were determined in 121 elderly subjects: 25 nondiabetic controls aged 69-86 years, and 96 type 2 (noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus) diabetics aged 64-96 years. Forty-seven of the diabetics were treated with tablets, 35 with insulin, and 14 with diet alone. Fasting serum C-peptide concentrations (nmol/l; mean +/- SD) were 0.51 +/- 0.20 for controls; 0.60 +/- 0.16 for diabetics on diet alone; 0.72 +/- 0.33 for diabetics on tablets and 0.46 +/- 0.23 for diabetics on insulin (p less than 0.001 for diabetics on tablets vs. controls and diabetics on tablets vs. diabetics on insulin). The glucagon-stimulated C-peptide concentrations were similar in all groups; the increment after glucagon was less in the diabetic patients on tablets or on insulin than in the nondiabetics. In 10 patients on insulin treatment and with fasting C-peptide of 0.24-1.46 nmol/l an attempt was made to withdraw insulin. In 4 subjects the transfer to tablets was possible. Serum C-peptide level did not predict the outcome of the attempt to change the therapy, but the possibility of an adequate dietary regimen seemed to be important. The results demonstrate a wide range of basal C-peptide concentrations in elderly diabetics on different treatments, which may indicate varying pathogenetic contributions of insulin deficiency and resistance in these patients. Our observations emphasize the necessity for regular re-evaluation of the therapeutic management of elderly diabetic patients.     

The effect of insulin withdrawal on intermediary metabolism in patients with diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis

Insulin was withdrawn from 7 patients with Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes and 4 patients with insulin-dependent diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis, both groups without residual beta-cell function. Median plasma glucagon concentrations rose slightly, but significantly after withdrawal of insulin in Type I diabetic patients (from 14 (range: 11-16) to 19 (14-25) pmol/l by 6 h), but not in the patients with secondary diabetes. This was accompanied by a significantly higher increase in blood glucose concentration from 5.1 (4.9-5.7) to 15.2 (12.9-18.1) mmol/l by 6 h in Type I diabetic patients compared with patients with secondary diabetes (from 4.9 (4.3-6.7) to 13.1 (10.9-13.5) mmol/l) (p less than 0.01). Beta-hydroxybutyrate increased to a similar extent in the two groups, whereas no significant increases were found in glycerol and lactate in any of the groups. Increased secretion of glucagon is not essential for the development of hyperglycemia and ketonemia in patients with diabetes secondary to chronic pancreatitis, but may augment the degree of hyperglycemia in Type I diabetic patients compared with patients having secondary diabetes.     

Pulsatile rather than continuous glucagon infusion leads to greater metabolic derangements in insulin-dependent diabetic subjects

The present study aimed at investigating the respective effects of continuous and pulsatile intravenous delivery of glucagon in insulin-dependent diabetic subjects. The study was performed in seven insulin-dependent diabetic subjects proven to have no residual insulin secretion. In random order and in different days each subject was submitted to glucagon delivery given continuously (58 ng/min) and in a pulsatile (377 ng/min during 2 min followed by 11 min during which no glucagon was infused) manner. In this conditions plasma glucose levels were significantly higher during pulsatile glucagon delivery. In particular in the last 65 min plasma glucose levels reached 10.8 +/- 0.3 vs 12.9 +/- 0.4 mmol/l (p less than 0.05) during continuous and pulsatile glucagon delivery respectively. Similarly plasma lipid changes also evidenced a greater effects of pulsatile rather than continuous hormone administration in producing the metabolic derangements classically encountered in insulin-dependent diabetic subjects. In conclusion, pulsatile glucagon delivery seem to produce greater metabolic effects than continuous hormone delivery.