A multicenter retrospective comparison of induction chemoimmunotherapy regimens on outcomes in transplant‐eligible patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon and typically aggressive form of lymphoma. Although often initially chemosensitive, relapse is common. Several induction and conditioning regimens are used in transplant‐eligible patients, and the optimal approach remains unknown. We performed an international, retrospective study of transplant‐eligible patients to assess impact of induction chemoimmunotherapy and conditioning regimens on clinical outcomes. We identified 228 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics were similar among the induction groups except for some variation in age. The type of induction chemoimmunotherapy received did not influence overall response rates (ORRs) (0.43), progression‐free survival (PFS) (P > .67), or overall survival (OS) (P > .35) on multivariate analysis (PFS and OS). Delivery of autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) was associated with favorable PFS and OS (0.01) on univariate analysis only; this benefit was not seen on multivariate analysis—PFS (0.36) and OS (0.21). Compared with busulfan and melphalan (BuMel), the use of the carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (BEAM)–conditioning regimen was associated with inferior PFS (HR = 2.0 [95% CI 1.1‐3.6], 0.02) but not OS (HR = 1.1 [95% CI 0.5‐2.3], 0.81) on univariate analysis only. Within the limits of a retrospective study and modest power for some comparisons, type of induction therapy did not influence ORR, PFS, or OS for transplant‐eligible patients with MCL. International efforts are required to perform randomized clinical trials evaluating chemoimmunotherapy induction regimens.     

Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio at Relapse Predicts Outcome for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

BackgroundPatients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a poor prognosis, even in the rituximab era. Several studies have reported the clinical importance of the peripheral blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in various malignancies, including lymphoma. However, the prognostic value of the LMR in relapsed/refractory DLBCL has not been well evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether the LMR at relapse can predict clinical outcomes for relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed data on 74 patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL, who were initially treated with R-CHOP (rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) or an R–CHOP-like regimen.ResultsThere was a significant association between a low LMR (≤ 2.6) and shorter overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001) compared with the high LMR group (> 2.6). Multivariate analysis showed that LMR was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P < .001) and PFS (P < .001), as was the international prognostic index (IPI) at relapse for OS. In addition, the LMR had an incremental value for OS and PFS compared with the IPI at relapse.ConclusionThe LMR predicts OS and PFS outcomes in relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, and might facilitate better stratification among patients in low- and intermediate-risk IPI groups.     

An evaluation based on relative treatment intensity in older patients treated with reduced-dose R-THP-COP therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

IntroductionThe number of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is increasing. Although the standard treatment for newly diagnosed younger patients with DLBCL has been established, no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal chemotherapy intensity and regimen for older patients with DLBCL. In addition, no method for evaluating treatment intensity in retrospective studies when different numbers of chemotherapy courses are administered has been elucidated.Materials and MethodsA multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of a reduced-dose R-THP-COP regimen, which included 30 mg/m² of pirarubicin, in 54 patients with DLBCL who were aged ≥75. To assess treatment intensity, we defined the relative treatment intensity (RTI) as the number of courses administered multiplied by the relative dose intensity (RDI).ResultsThe estimated four-year overall survival rates (OS) of the patients aged 75–80 and ≥ 80 were 55.1% and 60.6%, respectively. There was no significant difference in four-year OS between these age groups. In our cohort, there was no significant difference in the estimated four-year OS between the patients who received reduced-dose R-THP-COP at an RDI of ≥61% and those that received it at an RDI of <61% (P = 0.35). On the other hand, the patients who received reduced-dose R-THP-COP at an RTI of ≥2.7 exhibited a significantly higher estimated four-year OS than those treated at an RTI of <2.7 (68.5% vs. 28.7%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the RTI was a significant independent predictor of OS. The cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) at one year was 4.2% and 3.4% in the 75–80 and ≥ 80 age groups, respectively. The cumulative incidence of TRM was significantly worse among the patients with Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores of ≥2 than among those with CCI scores of 0 or 1.DiscussionOur study suggests that the reduced-dose R-THP-COP regimen is a suitable treatment option for older patients with DLBCL, especially those with CCI scores of <2. Our study also showed that the RTI may be a valuable tool for assessing treatment intensity in retrospective studies involving older patients.     

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export,Selinexor, in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Subtypes

BackgroundThe SADAL study evaluated oral selinexor in patients with relapsed and/or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after at least 2 prior lines of systemic therapy. In this post-hoc analysis, we analyzed the outcomes of the SADAL study by DLBCL subtype to determine the effects of DLBCL subtypes on efficacy and tolerability of selinexor.Patients and MethodsData from 134 patients in SADAL were analyzed by DLBCL subtypes for overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of treatment response, progression-free survival, and adverse events rate.ResultsORR in the entire cohort was 29.1%, and similar in patients with germinal center (GCB) versus non-GCB DLBCL (31.7% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.45); transformed DLBCL showed a trend towards higher ORR than de novo DLBCL: 38.7% vs. 26.2% (P = 0.23). Despite similar prior treatment regimens and baseline characteristics, patients with DLBCL and normal C-MYC/BCL-2 protein expression levels had a significantly higher ORR (46.2% vs.14.8%, P = 0.012) and significantly longer OS (medians 13.7 vs. 5.1 months, hazard ratio 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23-0.77], P = 0.004) as compared with those whose DLBCL had C-MYC and BCL-2 overexpression. Among patients who had normal expression levels of either C-MYC or BCL-2 and baseline hemoglobin levels ≥ 10g/dL, ORR was 51.5% (n = 47), with median OS of 15.5 months and median PFS of 4.6 months. Similar rates of adverse events were noted in all subgroups.ConclusionsOverall, single agent oral selinexor showed strong responses in patients with limited treatment alternatives regardless of germinal center B-cell type or disease origin.     

Clinicopathological prognostic indicators in 107 patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma transformed from follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) frequently transforms into diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To clarify the associated clinicopathological prognostic parameters, we examined the correlation of 11 histopathological parameters with progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 107 consecutive patients who had DLBCL with pre‐existing (asynchronous) or synchronous FL. The patients comprised 58 men and 49 women with a median age of 56 years. For DLBCL, the complete response rate was 81%, overall response rate was 88%, and 5‐year PFS and OS rates were 55% and 79%, respectively. Immunohistochemical analysis of the DLBCL component revealed the following positivity rates: CD10, 64%; Bcl‐2, 83%; Bcl‐6, 88%; MUM1, 42%; GCB, 82%; cMyc index ≥80%, 17%; and Ki‐67 index ≥90%, 19%. IGH/BCL2 fusion was positive in 57% of DLBCL cases. In univariate analyses, asynchronous FL and DLBCL (24%, P = 0.021), 100% proportion of DLBCL (29%, P = 0.004), Bcl‐2 positivity (P = 0.04), and high Ki‐67 index (P = 0.003) were significantly correlated with shorter PFS. Asynchronous FL and DLBCL (P = 0.003), 100% proportion of DLBCL (P = 0.001), and high Ki‐67 index (P = 0.004) were significantly correlated with shorter OS. In a multivariate analysis, asynchronous FL and DLBCL (P = 0.035) and 100% proportion of DLBCL (P = 0.016) were significantly correlated with shorter OS. Thus, asynchronism and 100% proportion of DLBCL, that is, FL relapsed as pure DLBCL, or FL and DLBCL at different sites, were significant predictors of unfavorable outcome of patients with DLBCL transformed from FL.     

Bendamustine and rituximab is well-tolerated and efficient in the treatment of indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma in elderly: A single center observational study

Bendamustine and rituximab (BR) is a preferred first-line therapy for indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); however, few reports on BR performance in elderly patients are available to date. We compared safety and efficacy of BR in patients ≥70 years (elderly) vs <70 years (younger) treated at our institution. Among 201 patients, 113 were elderly (median age: 77 years), including 38 patients ≥80 years, and 88 were younger (median age: 62 years). Elderly patients had more bone marrow involvement by lymphoma, anemia, ECOG status 3 and high-risk disease follicular lymphoma (P < .05 for all). Fifty-four percent of elderly received full dose of bendamustine vs 79.5% of younger patients. More elderly patients (54%) vs younger (43.2%) experienced treatment delay. Less elderly proceeded to rituximab maintenance. Overall, the number of adverse events per patient and transformed B-Cell lymphoma/secondary malignancies were similar between groups. Elderly patients had less febrile neutropenia, rituximab-associated infusion reactions, but more herpes zoster reactivation. There were more deaths in the elderly (37.2%) vs younger (10.2%) groups (P < .001), mainly due to non-lymphoma-related causes. With median follow-up of 42 months [4.0-97.0] disease-free survival for the elderly was similar to younger patients. There was no difference between patients <80 and ≥80 years (P = .274). In conclusion, the real-world elderly patients have more advanced disease and higher ECOG status. BR is well-tolerated; elderly patients had lower incidence of febrile neutropenia. Dose reduction and treatment delays are common, but BR efficacy was not affected even in very old patients (≥80 years).     

High Red Cell Distribution Width is an Adverse Predictive and Prognostic Factor in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated With Chemoimmunotherapy

IntroductionThe red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is an easy-to-obtain laboratory value that has emerged as a potential prognostic factor in solid and hematologic malignancies.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated 121 patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy at our institution between 2010 and 2012. We categorized patients with high RDW (> 14.6%) and normal RDW (11.6%-14.6%). We fitted multivariate regression models for complete response (CR) and overall survival (OS).ResultsPatients with high RDW were less likely to achieve CR to chemoimmunotherapy than patients with normal RDW (48% vs. 83%; P < .001). The 5-year OS rate for patients with high RDW was lower than in patients with normal RDW (51% vs. 79%; P = .001). In multivariate regression models, high RDW was independently associated with lower odds of achieving CR (odds ratio, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.83; P = .02) and with higher risk of death from any cause (hazard ratio [HR], 2.04; 95% CI, 1.03-4.02; P = .04) than normal RDW in patients with DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy. High RDW remained an independent adverse factor for OS after adjustment for the International Prognostic Index and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-International Prognostic Index scores with HR 2.20 (95% CI, 1.12-4.31; P = .02) and HR 2.67 (95% CI 1.28-5.59; P = .009), respectively.ConclusionHigh RDW appears to be an adverse predictive and prognostic factor in patients with de novo DLBCL treated with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).     

Autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with mantle cell lymphoma beyond 65 years of age: a study from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT)

BackgroundLimited experience is available on the feasibility and efficacy of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) beyond 65 years.Design and methodsWe analysed 712 patients with MCL treated with ASCT from 2000 to 2007 and reported to the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients >65 years were compared with patients <65 years for the end points non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse incidence, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).ResultsSeventy-nine patients were ≥65 years old. Median time from diagnosis to ASCT was longer in the elderly patients (11 versus 9 months, P = 0.005); they had more commonly received at least two treatment lines (62.0% versus 47.9%, P = 0.02) and were less commonly in first complete remission at ASCT (35.4% versus 51.2%, P = 0.002). Median follow-up after ASCT was 19 and 25 months, respectively. NRM was comparable at 3 months (3.8% versus 2.5%) and at 5 years (5.6% versus 5.0%). There were no differences in relapse rate (66% versus 55% at 5 years), PFS (29% versus 40%) and OS (61% versus 67%) between both populations of patients.ConclusionsASCT beyond 65 years of age is feasible in selected patients with MCL and results in similar disease control and survival as in younger patients.     

Treatment approaches for older and oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma – Use of non-R-CHOP alternative therapies and impact of comorbidities on treatment choices and outcome: A Humedica database retrospective cohort analysis, 2007–2015

IntroductionWe characterized real-world treatment patterns in older (65–74 years) and oldest (75–85 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving initial therapy (R-CHOP, non-R-CHOP regimens). Impact of comorbidities on treatment choice, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) were assessed by age.Patients and MethodsUsing the Humedica database, we identified 1436 newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who received frontline therapy from 1/07–9/15. The 885 patients ≥65 years of age were further evaluated for baseline demographics, comorbidities, initial therapy, and PFS/OS.ResultsOf 885 patients, 406 (45.9%) were age 65–74, and 479 (54.1%) age 75–85, years. First line therapy was R-CHOP (61.8%) or non-R-CHOP (38.2%). Although Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were similar at baseline, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were more common in those receiving non-R-CHOP regimens. Survival outcomes were superior for those receiving initial R-CHOP, versus non-R-CHOP, therapy (median PFS 53.9 versus 27.8 months; two-year PFS 71.2% versus 51.6%, p < .0001; median OS not reached versus 45 months; two-year OS 81.3% versus 62.9%, p < .0001, respectively). Only 10.4% (R-CHOP) and 12.1% (non-R-CHOP) of patients received second line therapies. Two-year OS by age (65–74, 75–85 years) was 66.4% and 39.1%, respectively with R-CHOP (p = .0045), and 74.3% and 54.5%, respectively with non-R-CHOP (p = .004), therapy. Age ≥ 75 years and CCI of 2+ were associated with shorter OS and PFS.ConclusionsThis study identified real-world first line treatment patterns for older patients with DLBCL. Our findings support the feasibility of administering standard R-CHOP therapy, even to oldest patients with DLBCL.     

The Impact of Age and Gender on Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Targeted Therapy

BackgroundA growing body of evidence suggests that age and gender play a role in cancer outcomes. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of age and gender on survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of patients with metastatic RCC treated on phase II and III clinical trials. Patients were stratified by age (young [<50 years], intermediate [50-70 years], versus elderly [>70 years]) and gender. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression adjusted for several risk factors and the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsWe identified 4736 patients with metastatic RCC. Overall, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) when stratified by age (21.0 vs. 17.3 months for elderly vs. intermediate age groups, P = .382; 20.0 vs. 17.3 months for young vs. intermediate age groups, P = .155) or gender (19.8 vs. 19.0 for male vs. female, P = .510). Progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in younger individuals compared with the intermediate age patients (6.0 vs. 7.1 months, P < .001), but similar across gender groups. Although all grade adverse events were more common in elderly patients (fatigue, diarrhea, decreased appetite, and weight), serious adverse events were similar between groups.ConclusionsAlthough OS was similar between age groups, younger individuals had a shorter PFS. Gender was not an independent determinant of survival. Elderly patients experienced more adverse events than their younger counterparts. These findings are important to guide clinicians when counseling patients about expectations and toxicity associated with therapy.     

Low-Dose Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer—Longevity Over Conventional Survival Analysis

BackgroundEnzalutamide is an important drug in the treatment of prostate cancer. Standard dosing often requires dose reduction because of side effects. There is no information on survival outcomes with lower doses. We investigated the impact of starting enzalutamide at ≤ 50% dose on metastatic prostate cancer outcomes including patients' longevity.Patients and MethodsRecords of metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with enzalutamide at one center were retrospectively reviewed. Low-dose enzalutamide (≤80 mg/day) was compared with standard-dose (160 mg/day). The primary objective was to compute the restricted mean survival time (RMST - time scale) and restricted mean attained age (RMAA - age scale) using the Irwin method. Secondary objectives included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and PSA progression per PCWG3 criteria (PSA PFS). We used the logrank test and the ∆ difference between RMSTs for comparison.ResultsOf 111 patients treated, 32 received a low-dose and 79 the standard-dose. Low-dose patients had less prior abiraterone or chemotherapy (28.1% vs. 65.8%, P < .001); more testosterone assessment (65.6% vs. 40.5%, P = .016); poorer ECOG performance status (48.3% score ≥2 vs. 26.6%; P = .040), more comorbidities (75.9% vs. 46.3%; P = .010)) including increased cardiovascular disease (51.7% vs. 21.4%, P = .004). Baseline PSA value and doubling time at start of enzalutamide and distribution of metastases were similar between the groups. OS and PFS did not differ between low-dose and standard-dose. Patients on low-dose had a better longevity with significantly longer RMAA, 89.1 years, versus standard-dose RMAA of 83.8 years (∆ = 5.3 years, P = .003, logrank P = .025). In a subgroup analysis by age at start of enzalutamide, <75 versus ≥75 years old, longevity was also better with low-dose in younger patients (∆ = 2.9 years, P = .034, and older, ∆ = 3.3 years, P = .011).ConclusionThe longevity advantage and reduced adverse events seen in patients with prostate cancer treated with low-dose enzalutamide warrants further investigation.     

Outcomes of HTLV-1 Carriers with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

BackgroundThe human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is associated with aggressive diseases, such as adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). However, less is known on the impact of HTLV-1 infection in non-ATLL hematologic malignancies. We aimed to investigate if HTLV-1 carriers with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have worse survival outcomes than non-HTLV-1 carriers.Materials and MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective cohort study by matching HTLV-1 carriers to non-carriers based on age, sex, Ann Arbor stage, and year of diagnosis. Our outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and PFS between carriers and non-carriers. We fitted multivariate Cox regression models to assess the mortality and recurrence/disease progression risk of HTLV-1 infection.ResultsA total of 188 patients, 66 with HTLV-1 infection and 122 without HTLV-1, were included in the study. HTLV-1 carriers had higher extranodal involvement than non-carriers (47% vs. 27%, P = .010). With a median follow-up of 78 months (95% CI: 41-90 months), HTLV-1 carriers had a similar 5 year OS (41% vs. 42%, P = .940) and PFS (34% vs. 32%, P = .691) compared to non-carriers. In the multivariate Cox analysis, HTLV-1 infection was not associated with worse OS (aHR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.64-1.50) or PFS (aHR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.60-1.34).ConclusionHTLV-1 carriers with DLBCL did not have worse survival outcomes compared to non-carriers. Our results suggest that clinicians should follow standard guidelines for DLBCL management on HTLV-1 seropositive patients.     

Patients Treated With Platinum-Doublet Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Have Inferior Outcomes If Previously Treated With Platinum-based Chemoradiation

IntroductionThe standard of care for locoregionally advanced non–small-cell lung cancer is concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation. Many patients relapse, and subsequent systemic treatment may involve platinum-doublet chemotherapy. It is not known if prior platinum-based chemoradiation influences the response to platinum-based chemotherapy given subsequently for relapse. Therefore, we compared outcomes in these patients with those in patients without prior treatment.MethodsA retrospective study of patients who had been treated with carboplatin and gemcitabine chemotherapy for de novo metastatic disease or recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer after receiving platinum-based chemoradiation. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 104 patients were analyzed. The median age was 63 years (range, 35-81 years), with 63 (61%) patients with newly diagnosed disease and with 41 (39%) who were previously treated. The response rate was significantly lower for those previously exposed to chemoradiation (10% vs. 29%: P = .001), as was the median PFS (3.6 months vs. 5.7 months; P = .002), and median overall survival (OS) (8.6 months vs. 12.1 months; P = .007). Only the treatment group was a significant predictor (P = .032) of PFS by univariate analysis. In univariate analysis; sex (men; P = .04), histology (squamous cell; P = .04), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale (P = .002), and treatment group (P = .023) predicted significantly inferior OS. Multivariate analysis showed that performance status was the only significant predictor of inferior OS.ConclusionOutcomes were inferior in patients previously exposed to platinum-based chemoradiation. An approach of stratifying such patients in future trials of chemotherapy should be adopted. Alternative options such as non–platinum-based agents or targeted therapies should be considered in this group.     

Comparison of Two Pediatric-Inspired Regimens to Hyper-CVAD in Hispanic Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BackgroundPediatric-inspired regimens (PIR) in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have led to better long-term outcomes. In Latin America, the adolescent and young adult population has an increasing incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with poor outcomes (5-year OS of approximately 20%) with traditional regimens.Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed of adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with PIR in two reference centers in Mexico City between March 2016 and June 2019, in which the primary endpoint was OS, compared to a historic cohort of patients treated with hyper-CVAD treated between February 2009 and June 2015.ResultsWe compared 73 patients treated with PIR (46 and 27 received modified versions of the ALL-BFM 90 and CALGB C10403 regimens, respectively) and 173 patients treated with hyper-CVAD. Patients treated with PIR experienced higher 4-week complete response rates (79.5% vs. 64.2%; P = .02) and lower relapse rates (44.1% vs. 60.0%; P = .04). OS was significantly higher with PIR than with hyper-CVAD (24 months: 41.5% vs. 28.1%; P = .012). The benefit on OS for PIR was only significant for CALGB (24-month OS: 61.1% vs. 28.0%; P = .01) but not for BFM. In the multivariate analysis, hyperleukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.22; P = .02), autologous stem-cell transplantation (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86; P = .02), and 4-week complete response (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70; P < .01) were independent prognostic factors. For the group of patients older than 20 years, only CALGB had an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97; P = .04).ConclusionIn terms of 4-week complete response, relapse rates, and OS, PIR provides benefits to Hispanic patients.     

Exploration of immunotherapy in advanced pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma

Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare and histologically distinctive subtype of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). High expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and scarcity of druggable driver mutations raise the potential of immunotherapy for advanced PELEC. However, evidence on the clinical impact of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remained limited and unconvincing. The present study retrospectively enrolled advanced PLELC patients who received ICIs either as up-front or salvage therapy in SYSUCC between March 15, 2017 and March 15, 2022. The comparative efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy vs chemotherapy in the first-line setting and chemoimmunotherapy vs ICIs monotherapy in the ≥2 line setting was investigated. A total of 96 patients were finally enrolled; 49 PLELC patients received immunotherapy plus platinum-based chemotherapy, while 45 patients received platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Patients with chemoimmunotherapy significantly obtain more survival benefits than those receiving chemotherapy (median progression-free survival [PFS]: 15.6 vs 8.6 months, P = .0015). Additionally, patients with chemoimmunotherapy obtained more PFS benefits than those with ICIs monotherapy in the ≥2 line of therapy (median PFS: 21.7 months vs 7.8 months, P = .094). A significant correlation was observed between prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and favorable treatment outcomes in patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy (median PFS: 17.8 months vs 7.6 months, P < .0001). Likewise, patients in the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR)-high group had significantly shorter PFS than the MLR-low group (median PFS: 11.2 months vs not reached, P = .0009). Our study elucidated the superior efficacy of ICIs therapy, especially chemoimmunotherapy in advanced PLELC, which may provide new insight into the role of immunotherapy in advanced PLELC.     

Timing of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Current Therapies

BackgroundAutologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) during the initial treatment of multiple myeloma has been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS). While awaiting further prospective data, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients at our program.Patients and MethodsWe included consecutive patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had undergone stem cell harvest (SCH) from 2005 to 2014 and separated them into early (SCT within 12 months of diagnosis) and delayed (all others, including SCT not yet) groups. The outcomes were OS, PFS to first relapse, and PFS to second relapse.ResultsOf the 514 patients who had undergone SCH, 227 were in the early and 287 in the delayed groups. Patients in the delayed group who had undergone SCT had received more therapy before SCT (55% had received ≥ 2 lines vs. 6% in the early group; P < .001), had had more progressive disease at SCT (34% vs. 4%; P < .001), had received melphalan doses < 200 mg/m² (22% vs. 10%; P = .001), and had had lower rates of very good partial response or better after SCT (58% vs. 79%; P = .001). On multivariable analysis, no differences were found in median OS (90 vs. 84 months; P = .093), PFS to first relapse (40 vs. 37 months; P = .552), or PFS to second relapse (54 vs. 52 months; P = .488) between the early and delayed groups.ConclusionDelaying SCT did not affect OS or even PFS to second relapse in our cohort of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma who had received current era induction therapy.     

Phase II TPDCV protocol for pediatric low-grade hypothalamic/chiasmatic gliomas: 15-year update

To report long-term results for children with low-grade hypothalamic/chiasmatic gliomas treated on a phase II chemotherapy protocol. Between 1984 and 1992, 33 children with hypothalamic/chiasmatic LGGs received TPDCV chemotherapy on a phase II prospective trial. Median age was 3.0 years (range 0.3–16.2). Twelve patients (36%) underwent STRs, 14 (42%) biopsy only, and seven (21%) no surgery. Twenty patients (61%) had pathologic JPAs, nine (27%) grade II gliomas, and four (12%) no surgical sampling. Median f/u for surviving patients was 15.2 years (range 5.3–20.7); 20 of the 23 surviving patients had 14 or more years of follow-up. Fifteen-year PFS and OS were 23.4 and 71.2%, respectively. Twenty-five patients progressed, of whom 13 are NED, two are AWD, and 10 have died. All children who died were diagnosed and first treated at age three or younger. Age at diagnosis was significantly associated with relapse and survival (P = 0.004 for PFS and P = 0.037 for OS). No PFS or OS benefit was seen with STR versus biopsy/no sampling (P = 0.58 for PFS, P = 0.59 for OS). For patients with JPAs and WHO grade II tumors, the 15-year PFS was 18.8 and 22.2% (P = 0.95) and 15-year OS was 73.7 and 55.6% (P = 0.17), respectively. Upfront TPDCV for children with hypothalamic/chiasmatic LGGs resulted in 15-year OS of 71.2% and 15-year PFS of 23.4%. No survival benefit is demonstrated for greater extent of resection. Age is a significant prognostic factor for progression and survival.     

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Pleural Mesothelioma at an Academic Referral Centre

BackgroundOverall survival (OS) for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) in vulnerable subgroups remains poorly understood with scarce data available to guide treatment decisions. The study describes real-world detailed treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced MPM overall and specifically in elderly and poor performance status (PS) patients.MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed for all patients with histologically confirmed MPM seen at University Health Network/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (UHN-PM).ResultsA total of 667 patients with MPM were identified and 304 advanced-disease MPM (aMPM) patients had continuing care at UHN-PM (UP-cohort). In the UP-cohort, 77% of patients received ≥ one line of systemic treatment. Systemic therapy trial participation was 39%. Patients not treated with systemic therapy (29%) were more likely to be ≥ 75 years and PS ≥ 2. Median OS was 15.3 months (95%CI 13.6-18.3), with longer survival in treated vs. untreated patients (17.4 vs. 10.6 months; P = .01). Longer survival with systemic treatment was seen in patients ≥75 years (12.7 vs. 6.6 months) and patients with poor PS (9.1 vs. 5.9 months). Median progression-free-survival (PFS) and OS for patients treated with second-line therapy was poor (3.0 and 8.9 months, respectively).DiscussionIn our real-world analysis of patients with aMPM treated at an academic referral centre, systemic treatment was given to the majority of patients and benefit was seen even in the elderly and poor PS patients frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. Trial participation was potentially facilitated by the formation of a dedicated multidisciplinary MPM clinic.     

Increased Bone Marrow Plasma-Cell Percentage Predicts Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

BackgroundPrevious reports have suggested that a higher bone marrow plasma-cell percentage (BMPC%) is associated with worse outcomes. However, it is unknown whether BMPC% is an independent predictor because genetic information was not available at that time. Currently the impact of BMPC% at diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) is not well described.Patients and MethodsWe evaluated the prognostic impact of BMPC% ≥ 60% versus < 60% in 1426 newly diagnosed MM patients. All patients had an estimation of their BMPC% at diagnosis, and the highest percentage was used. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses for PFS and OS using the Cox proportional hazards model were performed for age, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) score, creatinine level, and BMPC%.ResultsBMPC% ≥ 60% was found in 562 patients (39%), and the median PFS was shorter for these patients compared to BMPC% < 60% (22.6 vs. 32.1 months; P < .0001). Also, for OS, the median was shorter for the higher BMPC% group (53.4 vs. 75.4 months; P < .0001). On the multivariate analysis for PFS, age ≥ 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.46; P < .0001), R-ISS (1-2 vs. 3) (HR, 0.49; P < .0001), and BMPC% ≥ 60% (HR, 1.23; P = .015) were predictive. On the multivariate analysis for OS, age ≥ 65 years (HR, 2.23; P < .001), R-ISS (1-2 vs. 3) (HR, 0.41; P < .0001), and BMPC% ≥ 60% (HR, 1.24; P = .02) were also predictive.ConclusionBMPC% ≥ 60% at diagnosis is predictive for PFS and OS, even in a multivariate analysis that included known prognostic factors for MM.     

Long-term outcomes of elderly patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

IntroductionCytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were reportedly safe for the elderly. However, long-term survival data in this subgroup of patients are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the peri-operative and long-term outcomes of CRS + HIPEC in colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) in patients ≥70 years of age.Material and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed our combined institutional databases for patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC for CRC-PM. Clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the groups. Tumor extent was measured by the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction by the CCR score. Major morbidity was defined according to Clavien-Dindo classification.ResultsThe dataset of 159 patients included 33 elderly and 126 non-elderly patients. Clinical characteristics between the groups differed only in medical comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index 10 vs. 7, P < 0.001) and delivery of post-HIPEC adjuvant treatment (12.5% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.004). Overall PCI and CCR0 rates were similar between the groups, as were length of stay and major morbidity and mortality rates. Long-term outcomes in the elderly group were lower than those of the non-elderly (median OS: 21.8 vs. 40.5 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionsCRS + HIPEC in selected elderly patients can be safe in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, despite the same surgical extents and radicality, their long-term outcomes are inferior, possibly due to under-usage of systemic chemotherapy.