Performance of the Architect EBV Antibody Panel for Determination of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection Stage in Immunocompetent Adolescents and Young Adults with Clinical Suspicion of Infectious Mononucleosis

The Architect EBV antibody panel is a new chemiluminescence immunoassay system used to determine the stage of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection based on the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to viral capsid antigen (VCA) and IgG antibodies against Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1). We evaluated its diagnostic accuracy in immunocompetent adolescents and young adults with clinical suspicion of infectious mononucleosis (IM) using the RecomLine EBV IgM and IgG immunoblots as the reference standard. In addition, the use of the antibody panel in a sequential testing algorithm based on initial EBNA-1 IgG analysis was assessed for cost-effectiveness. Finally, we investigated the degree of cross-reactivity of the VCA IgM marker during other primary viral infections that may present with an EBV IM-like picture. High sensitivity (98.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 90.7 to 99.7%]) and specificity (94.2% [95% CI, 87.9 to 97.8%]) were found after testing 162 precharacterized archived serum samples. There was perfect agreement between the use of the antibody panel in sequential and parallel testing algorithms, but substantial cost savings (23%) were obtained with the sequential strategy. A high rate of reactive VCA IgM results was found in primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (60.7%). In summary, the Architect EBV antibody panel performs satisfactorily in the investigation of EBV IM in immunocompetent adolescents and young adults, and the application of an EBNA-1 IgG-based sequential testing algorithm is cost-effective in this diagnostic setting. Concomitant testing for CMV is strongly recommended to aid in the interpretation of EBV serological patterns.     

The use of semi-automated EBV IgG avidity determination for the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis

The diagnosis of acute Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is based frequently on the combination of positive viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM antibodies and negative EB viral nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) IgG antibodies. However, both VCA IgM and EBNA-1 IgG can provide false positive and false negative results. Therefore, situations in which the EBV serology remains unclear are not uncommon. Determination of EBV IgG avidity can clarify the EBV status in these patients. So far, mainly immunofluorescence assays have been used for this purpose. These tests are laborious, their evaluation is subjective, and automation is difficult. Therefore, two commercially available microtiter plate enzyme immunoassays (EIA) were compared for their usefulness for semi-automated EBV IgG avidity determination. One assay is based on a mixture of EBV antigens, the other assay uses a synthetic peptide of the VCA-complex. Patient sera of confirmed acute and past EBV infections were tested for avidity by both assays. The results with the antigen mixture assay proved to be highly sensitive (100%) and specific (100%). Avidity index calculations on the basis of one-point-quantification titers gave better results than calculations using OD values. Determination of EBV IgG avidity by the peptide assay was complicated by the fact that it was less sensitive than the antigen mixture assay for IgG detection in acute EBV infections. On the other hand, about 30% of the samples had to be retested with the peptide assay in a higher dilution because the IgG units in initial testing fell outside the range covered by the standard curve. Using OD values of the peptide EIA, the sensitivity was 99% but the specificity of detection of acute EBV infections was only 86%. Thus, while the peptide EBV avidity assay is unsuitable as a confirmatory assay, avidity testing with the antigen mixture assay is a useful tool to resolve equivocal EBV serologies. Avidity assays on the basis of EIA can be automated which should lead to wider use of this methodology. J. Med. Virol. 54:145–153, 1998. © 1998 Wiley-Liss,Inc.     

Evaluation of four commercial systems for the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus primary infections

To compare the performance of four diagnostic commercial systems for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology (for IgM and IgG virus capsid antigen [VCA] and EBV nuclear antigen [EBNA] antibodies), a collection of 125 samples from clinically suspected infectious mononucleosis cases was studied. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for VCA IgM and IgG antibodies and anticomplement immunofluorescence for EBNA antibodies (Meridian Bioscience Inc.) were used as reference methods. By these methods, the cases were classified EBV primary infection (presence of IgM to VCA or IgG to VCA in the absence of EBNA antibodies; n = 82), EBV past infection (presence of VCA IgG and EBNA antibodies in the absence of VCA IgM; n = 26), or no infection (negative for the three markers; n = 17). The following systems were tested: two chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs; the Liason [CLIA-L; DiaSorin] and the Immulite 2000 [CLIA-I; Siemens]), immunofiltration (IF; All.Diag), and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; DiaSorin). In the IgM assays, sensitivities ranged from 67.1% (ELISA) to 92.2% (CLIA-L) and specificities ranged from 93.8% (CLIA-L) to 100% (IF). In the VCA IgG assays, sensitivities varied from 79.4% (IF) to 94.4% (CLIA-I) and specificities varied from 94.4% (IF and CLIA-L) to 100% (CLIA-I and ELISA). In EBNA assays, sensitivities ranged from 78.1% (IF) to 93.8% (CLIA-I) and specificities ranged from 32.3% (CLIA-L) to 91.4% (IF). In relation to EBV profiles, the corresponding figures for sensitivity (in detecting primary infection) for IF, CLIA-L, CLIA-I, and ELISA were 92.7%, 93.8%, 89%, and 89.6%, respectively, and those for specificity (to exclude primary recent infection) were 90.7%, 94.6%, 97.7%, and 95.2%, respectively. Although there were limitations in some individual markers, especially CLIA-L for EBNA IgG, the systems evaluated appear to be useful for diagnosis of EBV infection.     

Prevalence of primary versus reactivated Epstein-Barr virus infection in patients with VCA IgG-, VCA IgM- and EBNA-1-antibodies and suspected infectious mononucleosis.

BACKGROUND: In Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, IgG- and IgM-antibodies to viral capsid antigen (VCA) and IgG-antibodies to Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) can occur simultaneously both in late primary infection and during subclinical viral reactivation in immunocompetent persons, and the differential diagnosis is of importance. OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of primary infection and serological reactivation in patients with suspected primary EBV infection and with all three parameters present. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty serum samples from 43 consecutive patients referred for suspected infectious mononucleosis and positive for VCA IgG-, VCA IgM- and EBNA-1-antibodies by EIA, were tested for IgG-antibody avidity with an EBV IgG immunoblot. Sera were also tested for heterophile antibodies (HA). To verify the presence of IgM-antibodies an EBV IgM immunoblot was performed when high-avidity IgG-antibodies were found. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of 43 patients with suspected primary EBV infection and VCA IgG-, VCA IgM- and EBNA-1-antibodies present, only 18 patients (42%) had a late primary infection. Twenty-one patients (49%) had high-avidity IgG-antibodies, indicating an IgM response due to reactivation, thus suggesting other causes for their symptoms. In 10 of these 21 patients the presence of IgM-antibodies was confirmed by immunoblot, indicating reactivation as a cause of IgM-antibodies in at least 23% of the 43 patients studied. Of 18 patients with primary infection, HA were detected in 16 (94%) of 17 patients tested. Only one (5%) of the patients with high-avidity antibodies had HA. Absence of HA in patients with this serological pattern is therefore a good indicator of reactivation, and conversely, the presence of HA is a good indicator of primary infection. In HA negative patients, avidity testing could be used for differential diagnosis.     

Seroepidemiology of EBV and interpretation of the “isolated VCA IgG” pattern

The presence of VCA IgG in the absence of VCA IgM and EBNA‐1 IgG antibodies makes classifying EBV infection more difficult as this serological picture can be seen in the case of past infection with EBNA‐1 IgG loss or non‐appearance, or acute infections with the early disappearance or delayed onset of VCA IgM. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of this pattern in 2,422 outpatients with suspected EBV infection examined in 2005–2006, and to interpret its significance by means of immunoblotting. One hundred and seventy‐seven (7.3%) of the patients were VCA IgG‐positive, VCA IgM‐negative and EBNA‐1 IgG‐negative, 15 of whom (8.5%) presented with heterophile antibodies. Analysis by age class showed that the prevalence of isolated VCA IgG ranged from 4.5% in the subjects aged 1–10 years to 9% in those aged >60 years. Immunoblotting allowed 18.9% of the cases to be classified as acute and 81.1% as past infections, the latter being observed in about 37% of the patients aged less than 10 years and in 100% of those aged >30 years. Therefore, in our case series, the presence of isolated VCA IgG was associated usually with past infection, particularly among adults. In children aged less than 10 years, it was associated mainly with acute infection but as past infection may be present in about one‐third of such children, this possibility should not be overlooked. J. Med. Virol. 81:325–331, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions

Serological tests for antibodies specific for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens are frequently used to define infection status and for the differential diagnosis of other pathogens responsible for mononucleosis syndrome. Using only three parameters [viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM and EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 IgG],it is normally possible to distinguish acute from past infection: the presence of VCA IgM and VCA IgG without EBNA-1 IgG indicates acute infection, whereas the presence of VCA IgG and EBNA-1 IgG without VCA IgM is typical of past infection. However, serological findings may sometimes be difficult to interpret as VCA IgG can be present without VCA IgM or EBNA-1 IgG in cases of acute or past infection, or all the three parameters may be detected simultaneously in the case of recent infection or during the course of reactivation. A profile of isolated EBNA-1 IgG may also create some doubts. In order to interpret these patterns correctly, it is necessary to determine IgG avidity, identify anti-EBV IgG and IgM antibodies by immunoblotting, and look for heterophile antibodies, anti-EA (D) antibodies or viral genome using molecular biology methods. These tests make it possible to define the status of the infection and solve any problems that may arise in routine laboratory practice.     

Evaluation of a multiplex flow immunoassay for detection of epstein-barr virus-specific antibodies

Conventional methods for the detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific antibodies include the immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). While sensitive and specific, these methods are labor-intensive and require separate assays for each analyte. This study evaluated the performance of a multiplex bead assay (BioPlex 2200; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) for the simultaneous detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM class antibodies to the EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) and IgG class antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen-1 (EBNA-1). Serum specimens (n = 1,315) submitted for routine EBV-specific antibody testing by EIA (Grifols-Quest, Inc., Miami, FL) were also tested by the multiplex bead assay using the BioPlex 2200 automated analyzer. Specimens showing discordant results were tested by IFA. Following IFA resolution, the BioPlex VCA IgM, VCA IgG, and EBNA-1 IgG assays demonstrated 97.9%, 91.4%, and 96.9% agreement, respectively, with the results obtained by EIA. Furthermore, the BioPlex assays showed an overall agreement of 94.1% with the EIA when the specimens were categorized by disease state (susceptible, acute, or past infection) based on the EBV-specific antibody profiles. These findings indicate that the BioPlex EBV assays demonstrate a performance comparable to that of the conventional EIA, while allowing for a more rapid (2.3 h for 100 samples versus 4.5 h by the EIA) and higher-throughput ( approximately 400 samples per 9 h versus 200 samples by the EIA) analysis of the EBV-specific antibody response.     

Evaluation of the New Elecsys Toxo IgG Avidity Assay for Toxoplasmosis and New Insights into the Interpretation of Avidity Results

Detection and treatment of acute toxoplasmosis during pregnancy can avoid severe disease of the fetus. In this context, assessment of anti-Toxoplasma IgG avidity has been shown to exclude recent infection. The Elecsys Toxo IgG and IgM assays (Roche Diagnostics) have been validated for screening pregnant women and a new assay, Elecsys Toxo IgG Avidity, was recently developed. Our aims were to investigate the performance characteristics of this new avidity assay and explore whether additional information can be provided by avidity assays. The Elecsys assay was compared with the Vidas (bioMérieux) and Architect (Abbott) Avidity assays using two sets of serum samples (n = 291 and n = 255). The rate of general agreement between the Elecsys and Vidas assays was 74%, and that between the Elecsys and Architect assays was 83%. For 11% of the serum samples, avidity was high with the Vidas assay and within the gray zone with the Elecsys assay. None of the assays detected high-avidity antibodies in serum taken <4 months after infection. Avidity values of >90% were exclusively reported in sera taken >9 months after infection by the Elecsys and Architect assays. Almost all avidities of <19% with the Elecsys assay and <17% with the Architect assay corresponded to sera taken <3 and <2 months after infection, respectively. The Elecsys IgG Avidity assay can be used to exclude recent infection. New ways of interpreting the avidity result are also suggested: very high or low values could exclude infections within the last 9 months or help to confirm a recent infection, respectively. However, these potential interpretations require further investigation.     

Evaluation of the New Architect Cytomegalovirus Immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG,and IgG Avidity Assays

A panel of new cytomegalovirus (CMV) assays for use on the Architect instrument has been developed, including a CMV avidity assay based on a new technology. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance characteristics of the fully automated CMV immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgG, and IgG avidity tests on the Architect instrument with those of other available assays. A total of 503 consecutive fresh patient serum specimens (routine serum specimens) and 96 serum specimens from 33 pregnant women with a recent CMV primary infection (seroconversion serum specimens) were tested for CMV IgM and IgG by the Architect (Abbott), Vidas (BioMérieux), and Enzygnost (Siemens) assays. The seroconversion sera and 100 preselected serum specimens IgM negative and IgG positive by the AxSYM assay were also tested by the IgG avidity tests on the Architect and Vidas instruments. The relative agreements for CMV IgM determination with routine sera between the Architect assay and the Vidas, Enzygnost, and AxSYM assays were 97%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, for the CMV IgM tests and 99%, 98%, and 98%, respectively, for the CMV IgG tests. The specificities of the CMV IgG avidity test were 98% for the Architect assay and 76% for the Vidas assay. No high CMV IgG avidity test results were found within the first 3 months after seroconversion by either of those assays. The correlation between the results of the newly developed CMV IgM and IgG tests on the Architect instrument with the Vidas and Enzygnost assays was excellent (≥94%). The CMV IgG avidity test reliably excluded patients with recent infections and showed an excellent specificity (98%).Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common cause of congenital infection. Primary infections occur in 0.15 to 2.0% of all pregnancies. The in utero transmission of CMV can take place during primary maternal infection or during nonprimary infection (reactivation and reinfection) of seropositive mothers, but the transmission rate to the fetus is much higher for nonimmune mothers (up to 40%) than for immune mothers (0 to 1%) (16). Fowler et al. showed that naturally acquired immunity results in a 69% reduction in the risk of congenital CMV infection in future pregnancies (2).Screening of pregnant women for CMV antibodies is a controversial issue and is not supported by international guidelines. Opponents of screening for CMV antibodies during pregnancy suggest that no clearly effective intervention is available. In addition, no tests can reliably predict which infected fetuses will have serious sequelae. The prognostic value of determination of the viral load in amniotic fluid is still a matter of debate and has the disadvantage of its invasive character (3, 5, 7, 10, 13, 15). On the other hand, many parents wish to have an antenatal diagnosis of intrauterine infections, and gynecologists generally offer screening for CMV antibodies. Prenatal screening certainly has advantages, such as the fact that the use of precautionary hygienic measures can be suggested to CMV-seronegative pregnant women. The knowledge of a primary CMV infection in a pregnant woman can lead to closer follow-up of the fetus by ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance.For the diagnosis of a primary CMV infection during pregnancy, it is of utmost importance that we have available reliable, noninvasive tests. CMV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) is produced during primary infection, but it is also detectable during reactivation and reinfection (9). A test that enables the discrimination of a primary infection from a nonprimary infection is important for counseling of the parents on the risk of congenital infection. CMV IgG avidity testing has been shown to be useful for distinguishing primary and nonprimary infections (1, 4, 6, 9). It measures the binding affinity of IgG antibodies. At the onset of infection, IgG antibodies of low avidity are produced. Over time, maturation of the antibody occurs, resulting in an increased binding affinity and, thus, a higher avidity. A diagnostic algorithm for CMV serology screening of pregnant women on the basis of CMV IgM, IgG, and IgG avidity testing was proposed by Munro et al. (12).Recently, a panel of new CMV assays for use on the Architect instrument has been developed, including a CMV IgG avidity assay. It is the first platform that enables the complete automation of avidity testing. While conventional avidity assays remove low-avidity antibodies by the use of a chaotropic agent, in tests with the Architect instrument, high-avidity antibodies are removed by neutralization with liquid antigen and low-avidity antibodies are detected directly. The purpose of the study described here was to evaluate the performance characteristics of the Architect CMV IgM, IgG, and IgG avidity assay and to compare the results with those of the CMV assays available from bioMérieux and Siemens.     

Assessment of rapid ELISA test for detection of Epstein-Barr virus infection.

A rapid test for the detection of IgM and IgG Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA-1) has been extensively marketed. If IgM to Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen (EBV VCA) is taken as evidence of current EBV infection, one observer detected 17 of 38 such samples and the other 22 of 38 as acute. The positive predictive value of the test was 63%, and the greatest difficulty was posed by the detection of IgM EBV VCA positive, heterophile antibody negative samples. Significant false positive results were obtained in sera with evidence of current Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus, and adenovirus infection. Rheumatoid factor was not a problem. Modification of the test protocol improved its performance: the positive predictive value rose to 87% and the negative predictive value to 81%. Although our modifications did not increase the speed of the test, there was reliable information on the EBNA-1 state. The test is best used as an adjunct to other EBV serology, and laboratories should be aware of the limitations of the rapid test.     

五厂家EB病毒抗体检测试剂盒血清学诊断鼻咽癌的比较

目的 通过比较EB病毒抗体检测试剂盒血清学诊断鼻咽癌的准确性和检测结果的一致性,为试剂盒在临床上的使用选择和性能改进提供依据.方法 使用五厂家的EB病毒衣壳抗原IgA和IgG抗体检测试剂盒（VCA IgA和VCA IgG试剂盒）、核抗原I IgA和IgG抗体检测试剂盒（EBNA1 IgA和EBNA1IgG试剂盒）、早期抗原IgA和IgG抗体检测试剂盒（EA IgA和EA IgG试剂盒）以及Zta IgA抗体检测试剂盒,分别检测33例鼻咽癌患者（NPC）、30例健康体检者（HD）和41例非鼻咽癌的其他肿瘤患者（NNPC）血清或血浆样本.结果 A厂家的VCA IgA试剂盒灵敏度高于其他厂家同品种试剂盒,但对于NNPC特异度最低（36.6％）;而D厂家VCA IgA试剂盒的特异度最高（97.6％）,且对HD的特异度均大于90％.B和D厂家的EBNA1 IgA试剂盒间阳性、阴性符合率分别为92.1％和100.0％.A和E厂家的EA IgA试剂盒的灵敏度均较低而特异度高,试剂盒间阳性符合率低（39.4％）,阴性符合率高（98.6％）;而VCA IgG试剂盒的灵敏度高但特异度低.A和C厂家的EBNA1IgG试剂盒的灵敏度高（100.0％,97.0％）但特异度低（3.3％,13.3％）.C厂家EA IgG试剂盒检测所有样本结果均为阴性.结论 五个不同厂家VCA LgA、EA IgA试剂盒诊断鼻咽癌的准确性和检测结果的一致性存在差异,特别是A厂家和其他国内厂家同品种试剂间差异明显,需根据临床目的进行选择.三家国产VCA IgA试剂盒的灵敏度需进一步提高.相反,EBNA IgA试剂盒诊断鼻咽癌的准确性和结果一致性较好.单独使用VCA IgG和EBNA1 IgG试剂盒血清学诊断鼻咽癌的特异度差,其判读界值可能需根据检测且的进行调整.     

Measurement of EBV-IgG anti-VCA avidity aids the early and reliable diagnosis of primary EBV infection

Current serological methods for the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection still differentiate poorly between primary infection and reactivation. This is particularly true when IgG and IgM antibodies are present simultaneously and only a single serum sample is provided for analysis. The demonstration of the IgG avidity state has the potential to distinguish recent from past or reactivated infection. An analysis of the kinetics of avidity maturation of anti-VCA antibodies in primary EBV infection was undertaken with longitudinally collected sets of sera from 28 well-characterised EBV cases and in sera from 35 cases with previous EBV infection and recent primary infection due to HIV, CMV, or hepatitis A. Antibodies directed against the viral capsid antigen (VCA) and Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA-1) were sought, using a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA). In parallel with standard IgG anti-VCA detection, serum was incubated with 8 M urea to disrupt low-avidity complexes to allow calculation of the percentage avidity. In cases with primary EBV infection, the mean avidity rose from 54% at 6 weeks to 82% by 28 weeks after the onset of symptoms, but remained lower than that of the control sera (96%). The addition of the avidity measurement improved the sensitivity of IgG and IgM anti-VCA testing in diagnosis of primary EBV infection from 93% to 100%. The specificity of IgM anti-VCA testing alone was poor, with 14 of 35 cases (49%) demonstrating false-positive results, but it improved to 97% by the demonstration of high-avidity IgG anti-VCA. The combination of negative IgG anti-EBNA and low-avidity IgG anti-VCA had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The routine addition of IgG anti-VCA avidity estimation to diagnostic EBV serology is recommended.     

Maintenance of Serum Immunoglobulin G Antibodies to Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Nuclear Antigen 2 in Healthy Individuals from Different Age Groups in a Japanese Population with a High Childhood Incidence of Asymptomatic Primary EBV Infection

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigens 2 and 1 (EBNA-2 and EBNA-1, respectively) were studied using sera from healthy individuals of a population with a high incidence of asymptomatic primary EBV infections during infancy or childhood in Japan. Two CHO-K1 cell lines expressing EBNA-2 and EBNA-1 were used for anticomplement and indirect immunofluorescence assays. The positivity rate for EBNA-2 IgG rose in the 1- to 2-year age group, increased and remained at a plateau (~45%) between 3 and 29 years of age (3- to 4-, 5- to 9-, 10- to 14-, and 15- to 29-year age groups), and then reached 98% by age 40 (≥40-year age group). Both seropositivity for EBNA-1 and seropositivity for EBNAs in Raji cells (EBNA/Raji) were detected in the 1- to 2-year age group, remained high, and finally reached 100% by age 40. The geometric mean titer (GMT) of EBNA-2 IgG reached a plateau in the 5- to 9- and 10- to 14-year-old groups and remained elevated in the older age groups (15 to 29 and ≥40 years). The GMT of EBNA-1 IgGs increased to a plateau in the 1- to 2-year-old group and remained unchanged in the older age groups. The GMT of EBNA/Raji IgGs also reached a plateau in the 1- to 2-year-old group, remained level throughout the 3- to 14-year age groups, and decreased in the 15- to 29-year-olds. EBNA-2 IgGs emerged earlier than EBNA-1 IgGs in 8 of 10 patients with infectious mononucleosis, who were between 1 and 27 years old, and declined with time in three of eight cases. These results suggest that EBNA-2 IgG antibodies evoked in young children by asymptomatic primary EBV infections remain elevated throughout life, probably because of reactivation of latent and/or exogenous EBV superinfection.     

Subclass reactivity to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen in primary and reactivated EBV infections

A new method for analysis of virus-specific Immunoglobulin G (IgG) subclasses was developed using indirect immunofluorescence. Three hundred thirty-three serum samples from patients with different types of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases and healthy controls were examined for subclass distribution to the virus capsid antigen (EBV VCA). EBV-VCA-expressing cell preparations were incubated with patient serum followed by monoclonal antibodies to human IgG1 through IgG4 and labelled anti-mouse IgG. Virus-specific IgG1 was found to be the dominant antibody. The titers for IgG1 and total Ig to EBV VCA correlated well. EBV VCA-specific IgG2 was not found. EBV VCA-specific IgG3 in a titer of greater than or equal to 10 was found in 33% of healthy seropositive donors, in 97% of patients with suspected reactivated EBV infection, and in 100% of symptomatic patients with suspected reactivated EBV infection. EBV VCA specific IgG3 occurred in 90% of placebo-treated compared to 30% in long-term acyclovir-treated bone marrow transplant recipients, indicating more frequent reactivations in the former group. IgG4 to VCA was infrequently found in seropositive persons. In serum samples from patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and high EBV VCA Ig and IgA titers, IgG4 to VCA was always present. Analysis of EBV VCA specific IgG subclasses seems to be valuable for the diagnosis of reactivated EBV infection.     

Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM assays incorporating the newVidia analyzer system

The new Vidia system is a fully automated system based on chemiluminescence and antigen bound to magnetic microparticles, which allows a fast measurement of Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM levels. The analytical performances of the Vidia Toxo IgG and IgM assays were compared with those of the automated Vidas, AxSYM, and Liaison Toxo IgG and IgM assays. The comparative evaluation was performed utilizing 204 frozen sera belonging to 166 subjects and 201 fresh sera collected from 198 subjects. For the Vidia Toxo IgG system, the sensitivities were 100% in both the retrospective and prospective studies, and specificities were 98.39% in the retrospective study and 100% in the prospective study, respectively. The sensitivities of the other three Toxo IgG assays were 100%, and the specificities ranged from 96.77% to 100%. For the Vidia Toxo IgM assay, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% in both the retrospective and prospective studies. The overall sensitivities and specificities of the other three Toxo IgM assays ranged from 80% to 100% and from 99.44% to 100%, respectively. In our study, the Vidia system revealed excellent sensitivity (100% for both IgG and IgM assays) and good specificity (99.25% for IgG and 100% for IgM assays).     

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection by novel ELISAs based on recombinant capsid antigens p23 and p18

A new pair of Epstein-Barr virus ELISAs (Biotest Anti-EBV VCA IgG and VCA IgM ELISA) was evaluated for usefulness for routine diagnosis of acute EBV infections. The ELISAs are based on two viral capsid antigens (VCA), p23 (BLRF2, full-length) and p18 (BFRF3, carboxy-half), that are combined by autologous gene fusion. In total, 179 sera were tested in direct comparison with classical VCA immunofluorescence assays (IFA). With the help of clinical data and additional reference serology, i.e., heterophile antibodies, anti-EA IgG (IFA) and anti-EBNA-1 IgG (ELISA), the patients were divided into the following categories: seronegatives (46), acute primary infections (67), previous infections (39), suspected reactivations (20) and constellations with intermediate serological patterns (7). The VCA IgG and VCA IgM ELISAs showed overall agreement to IFA of 95.0% and 94.4%, respectively. The calculated analytical performance (sensitivity; specificity) of VCA IgG and VCA IgM was 94.0%; 97.8% and 97.1%; 96.5%, respectively. A certain delay in seroconversion of anti-p23-p18 IgG may account for a significant difference in sensitivity of the VCA IgG ELISA between primary (88.4%) and previous infections (100%). In summary, the new recombinant VCA ELISAs yielded good correlation to VCA IFA and in combination with EBNA-1 IgG allow rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis or EBV immune status in general.     

Evaluation of a multianalyte profiling assay and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for serological examination of Epstein-Barr virus-specific antibody responses in diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Assessment of antibody responses to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens has been used to assist in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) diagnosis by several methods. In this study, we evaluated an in-house Luminex multianalyte profiling (xMAP) technology and commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits for serological examination of EBV-specific antibody responses in 135 NPC patients and 130 healthy controls. Four EBV biomarkers were measured: immunoglobulin A (IgA) against viral capsid antigen (VCA), EBV nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1), diffused early antigen (EA-D), and IgG against EA-D. The sensitivities and specificities of the four markers ranged between 71.5 and 90% for xMAP assays and 80 and 92% for ELISA. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the combined markers in the xMAP assay had overall sensitivity and specificity values of 82% and 92%, respectively. The correlation coefficient (r) values for the xMAP assay and ELISA were lowest for IgA-VCA (0.468) and highest for IgA-EBNA1 (0.846); for IgA-EA-D and IgG-EA-D, the r values were 0.719 and 0.798, respectively. The concordances of the two methods for NPC discrimination were good (79 to 88%). Our results suggest that both the xMAP assay and ELISA are satisfactory for EBV antibody evaluation when multiple antigens are included.     

Single-assay combination of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) EBNA1- and viral capsid antigen-p18-derived synthetic peptides for measuring anti-EBV immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibody levels in sera from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: options for field screening

Assessment of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody responses to various Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigen complexes, usually involving multiple serological assays, is important for the early diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Through combination of two synthetic peptides representing immunodominant epitopes of EBNA1 and viral capsid antigen (VCA)-p18 we developed a one-step sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the specific detection of EBV reactive IgG and IgA antibodies in NPC patients (EBV IgG/IgA ELISA). Sera were obtained from healthy donors (n = 367), non-NPC head and neck cancer patients (n = 43), and biopsy-proven NPC patients (n = 296) of Indonesian and Chinese origin. Higher values of optical density at 450 nm for EBV IgG were observed in NPC patients compared to the healthy EBV carriers, but the large overlap limits its use for NPC diagnosis. Using either EBNA1 or VCA-p18 peptides alone IgA ELISA correctly identified 88.5% and 79.8% of Indonesian NPC patients, with specificities of 80.1% and 70.9%, whereas combined single-well coating with both peptides yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 90.1 and 85.4%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) for the combined EBNA1 plus VCA EBV IgA ELISA were 78.7% and 93.9%, respectively. In the Indonesia panel, the level of EBV IgA reactivity was not associated with NPC tumor size, lymph node involvement, and metastasis stage, sex, and age group. In the China panel the sensitivity/specificity values were 86.2/92.0% (EBNA1 IgA) and 84.1/90.3% (VCA-p18 IgA) for single-peptide assays and 95.1/90.6% for the combined VCA plus EBNA1 IgA ELISA, with a PPV and an NPV for the combined EBV IgA ELISA of 95.6 and 89.3%, respectively. Virtually all NPC patients had abnormal anti-EBV IgG diversity patterns as determined by immunoblot analysis. On the other hand, healthy EBV carriers with positive EBV IgA ELISA result showed normal IgG diversity patterns. By using EBV IgG immunoblot diversity as confirmation assay for EBV IgA ELISA-positive samples, the sensitivity and specificity for NPC diagnosis increased to 98% and 99.2%, respectively, in the Indonesian NPC samples. The use of these combined methods for seroepidemiological screening studies is proposed.     

Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Epstein-Barr Virus Enzyme Immunoassays with an Immunofluorescence Assay as the Reference Method

Four commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Novitec, Biotest, Virotech, and DiaSorin) were evaluated, with an indirect immunofluorescence assay as the reference method, for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) VCA (viral capsid antigen) immunoglobulin G (IgG), VCA IgM, or EBNA (EBV nuclear antigen) IgG at three different locations (Homburg, Stuttgart, and Dresden). Serum samples from 66 immunocompetent patients with infectious mononucleosis, 73 patients without prior EBV infection, and 96 patients with past EBV infections and 29 serum samples with possible cross-reactions to other herpesviruses were included. In addition, 25 samples from an extensively pretested panel that is commercially available (Boston Biomedica) were tested. Each sample was tested at only one location. The four EIAs varied considerably in performance. When analyzing for EBV diagnosis, the Novitec assay performed the best, with 4.9% discrepant diagnoses, followed by the Biotest, Virotech, and DiaSorin assays, with 6.8, 11.7, and 14.0% discrepant diagnoses, respectively. On the basis of single-parameter analysis, the Novitec assay also showed the lowest number of discrepant results, with 3.5%, compared with the Virotech, Biotest, and DiaSorin assays, which produced 5.4, 6.4, and 8.6% discrepant results, respectively. VCA assays using affinity-purified native antigens performed better than assays with recombinant or synthetic antigens. The synthetic EBNA-1s showed the lowest concordance with the reference compared to recombinant p72. Commercially available EBV EIAs differed considerably in performance; however, some proved to be reliable and convenient alternatives to the indirect immunofluorescence assay for routine diagnostics. Native antigens, rather than synthetic peptides, are favored for EBV serology testing.