Activity of linezolid against multi-resistant gram-positive bacteria from diverse hospitals in the United Kingdom

The in vitro activity of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, was assessed against 374 gram-positive cocci, with an emphasis on testing multi-resistant, epidemiologically unrelated isolates. MICs of linezolid for staphylococci, pneumococci and streptococci had a narrow range, from 0.5 to 2 mg/L, whereas MICs for enterococci were uniformly 4 mg/L. For all the species tested, the MICs of linezolid were unrelated to those of other antimicrobials. Linezolid appears to be a potentially useful drug for infections caused by gram-positive cocci.     

Comparative in vitro activity of PD 127391, a new fluoroquinolone agent, against susceptible and resistant clinical isolates of gram-positive cocci.

We examined the in vitro activity of PD 127391, an investigational fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent, against staphylococci (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), enterococci (including beta-lactamase-producing and highly gentamicin-resistant isolates), and streptococci. The compound was active against all organisms tested and compared favorably with antimicrobial agents routinely used to treat infections with these organisms. On the basis of MICs for 90% of the strains tested, PD 127391 was 32-fold more active against all staphylococci, 16-fold more active against methicillin-resistant S. aureus, 8-fold more active against all streptococci, and 4-fold more active against all enterococci than ciprofloxacin. PD 127391 was shown to be more active than sparfloxacin, which in turn was shown to be more active than ciprofloxacin, against these gram-positive cocci. PD 127391 shows promise for the treatment of infections with gram-positive cocci, including organisms which are resistant to other commonly used antimicrobial agents.     

Comparative in vitro activities of daptomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin/dalfopristin against Gram-positive bacterial isolates from a large cancer center

Our objective was to evaluate and compare the in vitro activity of daptomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin/dalfopristin against clinical bloodstream isolates of Gram-positive pathogens from a large cancer center in the Northeastern United States. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for daptomycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and linezolid against 258 isolates; bactericidal activity was evaluated using time-kill experiments against 14 representative pathogens. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci represented the largest proportion of bacteria tested (32% of the isolates), followed by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (23%), and vancomycin sensitive enterococci (14%). Against staphylococci, the MIC90 was 1 microg/mL for both daptomycin and quinupristin/dalfopristin and 4 microg/mL for linezolid. Against enterococci, the MIC90 for both daptomycin and linezolid was 4 microg/mL and was 16 microg/mL for quinupristin/dalfopristin. The quinupristin/dalfopristin MIC90 for Enterococcus faecium was 2 microg/mL. Two enterococci were linezolid resistant and remained susceptible to daptomycin. In vitro time-kill studies found daptomycin to be rapidly bactericidal against the majority of organisms tested, killing 99.9% of bacteria within 6 h. Quinupristin/dalfopristin was bactericidal against staphylococci and bacteriostatic against most enterococci. Linezolid was bacteriostatic against all organisms evaluated. Daptomycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and linezolid each demonstrated in vitro activity against this collection of organisms. Future clinical studies to evaluate a potential role for these agents in the management of infections in cancer patients, including the treatment of febrile neutropenia, appear warranted.     

In vitro activity of linezolid against multiply resistant Gram-positive clinical isolates

The in vitro activity of the oxazolidinone linezolid was compared with the activities of vancomycin and teicoplanin against 450 Gram-positive clinical isolates, including a variety of multiply resistant strains. Linezolid inhibited all microorganisms tested at < or = 4 mg/L, including methicillin- and teicoplanin-resistant staphylococci, glycopeptide-resistant enterococci, penicillin- and multiply resistant pneumococci and viridans streptococci, and erythromycin-resistant beta-haemolytic streptococci. The MIC(90) of linezolid for all isolates was 2 mg/L.     

Comparative in vitro activities of teicoplanin, vancomycin, oxacillin, and other antimicrobial agents against bacteremic isolates of gram-positive cocci.

The in vitro activities of teicoplanin and vancomycin were compared with those of six other antimicrobial agents against 460 bacteremic isolates of gram-positive cocci. Teicoplanin was as active as vancomycin but less active than ciprofloxacin against staphylococci. Teicoplanin was the most potent of all agents tested against enterococci and had excellent activity against pneumococci.     

In vitro activity of daptomycin versus linezolid and vancomycin against gram-positive uropathogens and ampicillin against enterococci, causing complicated urinary tract infections

OBJECTIVES: The existing therapeutic options for complicated urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by gram-positive uropathogens are not always optimal. Therefore, newer antimicrobials have to be assessed. METHODS: The antimicrobial activity of daptomycin was tested versus linezolid, vancomycin, and ampicillin (enterococci on ly), against pathogens from three different collections: (1) Uropathogens from hospitalized urological patients with complicated and/or hospital-acquired UTIs of the Urologic Clinic, Hospital St. Elisabeth, Straubing. (2) Uropathogens from a multicenter study comprising 37 urological centers throughout Germany. (3) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates of patients and staff within the Hospital St. Elisabeth, Straubing. Genotyping of the latter isolates was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, and ampicillin (only tested against enterococci) were determined by an agar dilution method using a multipointer with an inoculum of 10(4) CFU per point. RESULTS: For all methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (n = 25), MRSA (n = 49), methicillin-susceptible coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 129), methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 33), for Enterococcus faecalis (n = 289), and for Enterococcus faecium (n = 4) the MICs ranged up to 2 mg/l (daptomycin, linezolid), up to 4 mg/l (vancomycin), and up to 8 mg/l (ampicillin, enterococci only) indicating that all strains were susceptible to the antibiotics tested. CONCLUSIONS: According to the in vitro activity daptomycin may be considered a promising antibacterial agent for the treatment of complicated UTI caused by gram-positive uropathogens. Thus, daptomycin should be evaluated in a clinical study.     

利奈唑胺的体外抗菌作用研究

目的评价抗菌新药利奈唑胺的体外抗菌作用。方法采用琼脂对倍稀释法测定利奈唑胺对579株临床分离菌的体外抗菌活性，并与有关抗菌药进行比较；测定利奈唑胺的杀菌浓度和杀菌曲线；培养条件对利奈唑胺抗菌活性的影响。结果利奈唑胺对葡萄球菌属、肺炎链球菌等链球菌属、肠球菌属临床分离菌均具高度抗菌活性，包括对其中的甲氧西林耐药葡萄球菌、青霉素中介肺炎链球菌亦具良好的抗菌作用。对流感嗜血杆菌、淋病奈瑟菌的抗菌活性较低。对脆弱拟杆菌等厌氧菌具较高抗菌活性。利奈唑胺对耐药的革兰阳性球菌的抗菌作用与万古霉素和替考拉宁相仿或略强。最低杀菌浓度（MBC）测定及杀菌曲线试验结果显示利奈唑胺对肺炎链球菌、溶血性链球菌具有很强的杀菌作用，对大部分葡萄球菌属具杀菌作用，对肠球菌仅具抑菌作用。培养基pH值的改变、细菌接种量的改变对利奈唑胺抗菌活性有一定影响，人血清含量改变对该药抗菌活性无明显影响。结论利奈唑胺对需氧革兰阳性球菌，包括多重耐药菌具有高度抗菌活性，且与其他抗菌药问无交叉耐药。提示利奈唑胺对革兰阳性球菌，尤其是多重耐药株所致感染的控制将具有重要作用。     

In vitro activity of linezolid against vancomycin-resistant enterococci, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.

We report the activity of the new oxazolidinone antimicrobial agent linezolid against 37 clinical isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (including organisms carrying the vanA, vanB, vanC-1, and vanC-2/3 genes), 26 clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and 20 clinical isolates of high-level penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae. All isolates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci were inhibited by < or = 4 ug/ml of linezolid. All isolates of methicillin-resistant S. aureus were inhibited by < or = 8 ug/ml of linezolid. All isolates of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae were inhibited by < or = 2 ug/ml of linezolid. Linezolid inhibits strains of multidrug resistant Gram-positive cocci in vitro at concentrations < or = 8 ug/ml.     

Linezolid for the treatment of resistant gram-positive cocci

OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of linezolid, the first of a new class of antibiotics, the oxazolidinones. Therapeutic issues regarding the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria and a brief history of the oxazolidinones are also discussed. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1966-March 2001) was conducted to identify pertinent literature, including preclinical trials, clinical trials, and reviews. Unpublished clinical data, adverse effects, and dosing information were abstracted from product labeling. STUDY SELECTION: Clinical efficacy data were extracted from clinical trials, case reports, and abstracts that mentioned linezolid. Additional information concerning antibiotic resistance, the oxazolidinones, in vitro susceptibility and the pharmacokinetic profile of linezolid also was reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Linezolid exhibits activity against many gram-positive organisms, including vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Linezolid inhibits bacterial protein synthesis at an early step in translation and is rapidly and completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract following oral administration. Efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of unpublished clinical trials in adults with pneumonia, skin and skin structure infections, and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium infections. The adverse effect profile is similar to that of comparator agents (beta-lactams, clarithrornycin, vancomycin). CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid is the first oral antimicrobial agent approved for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Since the oxazoildinones have a unique mechanism of action and expanded spectrum of activity against virulent and highly resistant gram positive pathogens, linezolid is a valuable alternative to currently available treatment options. Clinical trials evaluating linezolid and other oxazolidinones for antibiotic-resistant gram-positive infections, as well as comparator studies comparing linezolid with other candidate drugs, such as quinupristin/dalfopristin and choramphenicol, will further define the role of linezolid.     

Zyvox Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum Program Results for 2006: an activity and spectrum analysis of linezolid using clinical isolates from 16 countries

The Zyvox Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum Program has completed its fifth year of monitoring for emerging resistance to linezolid and other Gram-positive active agents on the continents of Europe, Asia, Australia, and Latin America. In 2006, 4216 Gram-positive isolates from 16 nations were submitted for analysis from 6 organism groups including Staphylococcus aureus (54.0%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (14.6%), enterococci (10.0%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (9.4%), viridans group streptococci (5.0%), and beta-hemolytic streptococci (7.0%). Linezolid retained potent activity against S. aureus (MIC(50) and MIC(90), 2 microg/mL; 39.8% methicillin resistant) and CoNS (MIC(50) and MIC(90), 1 microg/mL; 74.3% methicillin resistant). Despite endemicity of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (up to 30.0%) in several nations, linezolid inhibited >99% of strains at 相似文献   

Comparative in vitro activities of ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, and other antimicrobial agents against bloodstream isolates of gram-positive cocci

The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against 316 bloodstream isolates of staphylococci, pneumococci, and enterococci was compared with the activities of six fluoroquinolones and three other antimicrobial agents. Of the antimicrobial agents tested, gemifloxacin was the most potent against penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci, methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates, and coagulase-negative staphylococci.     

Summary of Linezolid Activity and Resistance Mechanisms Detected during the 2012 LEADER Surveillance Program for the United States

This study summarizes the linezolid susceptibility testing results for 7,429 Gram-positive pathogens from 60 U.S. sites collected during the 2012 sampling year for the LEADER Program. Linezolid showed potent activity when tested against 2,980 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, inhibiting all but 3 at ≤2 μg/ml. Similarly, linezolid showed coverage against 99.5% of enterococci, as well as for all streptococci tested. These results confirm a long record of linezolid activity against U.S. Gram-positive isolates since regulatory approval in 2000.     

Spectrum and potency evaluation of a new oxazolidinone,linezolid: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1998-2000

Resistance (R) among Gram-positive cocci has escalated in the last two decades to levels necessitating the development and use in the newer drug classes, oxazolidinones (linezolid) and streptogramins (quinupristin/dalfopristin [Q/D]). The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program has monitored these classes before, during and after their release by various regulatory agencies. Over 30,000 Gram-positive strains were tested against >30 drugs by reference broth microdilution methods between 1998-2000 in four geographic regions (Asia-Western Pacific [APAC], Europe [EU], Latin America [LA], North America [NA]). The tested strains were 23,188 staphylococci; 5,103 enterococci and 2,045 streptococci. Among staphylococci, linezolid was active against all isolates (MICs, < or =4 microg/ml) regardless of susceptibility patterns of other antimicrobial agents. Similar results were noted for vancomycin (includes one VISA from Hong Kong), teicoplanin, and Q/D (<1% R). Gatifloxacin had the widest spectrum among fluoroquinolones (FQ) against Staphylococcus aureus (1.5-9.2% R) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (0.8-4.0%). Linezolid was also active against all enterococci (MIC50 and (90,) 2 microg/ml). Q/D was active against only 75.3% of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). The VRE rate was highest in NA (12.4%) > EU (3.2%) > LA (1.6%) > APAC (1.3%). Among streptococci, linezolid was consistently active (MIC(90,) 1 microg/ml) as were the glycopeptides and Q/D. Variable penicillin-R (MIC, > or = 2 microg/ml) was observed among regions: EU (32.5%) > APAC (15.1%) > LA (13.8%) > NA (9.6%), and macrolide-R was higher in EU (40.3%). Ciprofloxacin-R at > or =4 microg/ml in streptococcal strains was noted world wide highest in viridans group streptococci (18.4-25.6%). Linezolid remained active (MIC, < or =4 microg/ml) against all Gram-positive species strains tested in the SENTRY Program (1998-2000). Q/D, glycopeptides and newer FQ compounds were generally less effective in vitro. It remains a prudent practice to continue surveillance programs to detect emerging resistance patterns and recognize significant regional variations in the oxazolidinone susceptibilities.     

Comparative activity of linezolid and other new agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and teicoplanin-intermediate coagulase-negative staphylococci.

The activity of linezolid was determined against 225 recently isolated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and 20 methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) with decreased levels of susceptibility to teicoplanin. Linezolid activity was compared with other new agents (quinupristin-dalfopristin, trovafloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin and telithromycin) and six other antimicrobials (erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, vancomycin, teicoplanin and rifampicin). The in vitro activity of linezolid was similar to that of vancomycin. Linezolid inhibited all MRSA strains at between 0.1 and 2 mg/L and all CoNS strains tested at between 0.2 and 0.5 mg/L. These results suggest that linezolid would be useful for the treatment of infections involving these organisms.     

Role of linezolid in the treatment of orthopedic infections

Gram-positive organisms, particularly staphylococci and streptococci, are responsible for the majority of bone and joint infections. The rising incidence of antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and enterococci means that novel antibiotics with unique mechanisms of antimicrobial activity are needed, especially in orthopedic infections. Linezolid is the first of the oxazolidinones, a new class of antibacterial agents particularly effective against Gram-positive infections including methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant strains. With an excellent oral bioavailability and acceptable safety profile, linezolid offers a valuable alternative to more traditional therapies, such as glycopeptides. No large randomized trials have been published on its use in patients with orthopedic infections, but early results are encouraging. Reported adverse events, especially bone marrow suppression and optic neuropathy seen with prolonged administration, mean that treatment of such patients must be undertaken with careful follow-up of laboratory tests. Until now, little resistance has been reported.     

Trends in linezolid susceptibility patterns in 2002: report from the worldwide Zyvox Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum Program

Oxazolidinones have become reliable clinical and candidate antimicrobial agents to be utilized for infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-positive cocci, especially vancomycin-resistant enterococci and methicillin-resistant staphylococci. However, mutational resistance of the ribosomal target has been described for several species. Longitudinal surveillance remains necessary to monitor for this evolving linezolid resistance pattern. A survey of linezolid and several comparison Gram-positive focused agents was initiated in 2002 (7971 strains, >99.0% compliance) for 54 participating sites in the United States, Canada, Europe (6 nations), Latin America (2 nations), and the Asia Pacific (2 nations). The 5 and 25 sites in Canada and the United States, respectively, submitted 200 strains each to a central laboratory for organism identification/confirmation and reference MIC processing. The 10 remaining nations had 200 strain samples from 1 to 4 separate institutions. Linezolid resistance (MIC >/= 8 microg/mL) was confirmed by alternative susceptibility testing methods (Etest, AB BIO Disk, Solna, Sweden; disk diffusion method) and target mutation characterization by PCR and sequence analysis. Linezolid activity against the 6 major organism groups did not vary between geographic areas. A total of 98.1% of linezolid MIC values were between 0.5 and 2 microg/mL, and only 0.5% of results were at 4 microg/mL, which included 32 Staphylococcus aureus (0.9%) and 5 (0.5%) enterococcal isolates. Linezolid resistance was detected in only 4 isolates (0.05%): 1 each Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecium, and a viridans group Streptococcus. All 4 isolates had a G2576U mutation in the 23S rRNA target. Linezolid activity as outlined by these Zyvox Annual Appraisal of Potency and Spectrum (ZAAPS) Program results demonstrate sustained, near complete activity against contemporary Gram-positive isolates on 4 monitored continents and in centers utilizing oxazolidinones. Rare linezolid-resistant strains were identified in the United States only (0.05% resistance overall).     

Linezolid in vitro: mechanism and antibacterial spectrum

Oxazolidinones are prominent among the new Gram-positive antimicrobial agents now becoming available. They were discovered by DuPont Pharmaceuticals in the late 1980s but linezolid, the first analogue suitable for development, was found only when the family was re-examined by Pharmacia in the 1990s. Oxazolidinones bind to the 50S subunit of the prokaryotic ribosome, preventing formation of the initiation complex for protein synthesis. This is a novel mode of action; other protein synthesis inhibitors either block polypeptide extension or cause misreading of mRNA. Linezolid MICs vary slightly with the test method, laboratory, and significance attributed to thin hazes of bacterial survival, but all workers find that the susceptibility distributions are narrow and unimodal, with MIC values between 0.5 and 4 mg/L for streptococci, enterococci and staphylococci. Full activity is retained against Gram-positive cocci resistant to other antibiotics, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. MICs are 4-8 mg/L for Moraxella, Pasteurella and Bacteroides spp. but other Gram-negative bacteria are resistant as a result of endogenous efflux activity. Resistance is difficult to select in vitro but has been reported during therapy in a few enterococcal infections and in two MRSA cases to date; the mechanism entails mutation of the 23S rRNA that forms the binding site for linezolid. Risk factors for selection of resistance include indwelling devices, undrained foci, protracted therapy and underdosage.     

In vitro susceptibility to everninomycin of gram-positive nosocomial pathogens isolated from intensive care units in Germany

BACKGROUND: Gram-positive bacteria are increasingly found to be causative pathogens in nosocomial infections, and the occurrence of vancomycin resistance in enterococci as well as staphylococci has prompted the investigation of alternative antimicrobial agents active against these strains. Everninomycin, a new oligosaccharide antibiotic, has excellent in vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria, including those resistant to vancomycin. However, avilamycin, a related compound, has been used in Europe as a growth promoter in animal food for years and concern has been raised that cross-resistance in clinical isolates may arise. METHODS: We studied a collection of 268 nosocomial gram-positive isolates from intensive care unit patients with nosocomial pneumonia, urinary tract infection and sepsis, using standard in vitro susceptibility testing. RESULTS: It could be shown that all species tested were exquisitely sensitive to everninomycin (MIC(90) of 0.38 microg/ml for Staphylococcus aureus, 0.5 microg/ml for enterococci and 0.75 microg/ml for coagulase-negative staphylococci). Furthermore, no difference could be observed between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive S. aureus or between Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that everninomycin is a promising antibiotic for the treatment of nosocomial infections in intensive care unit patients and that the use of a related substance as an additive in animal food has not yet promoted resistance in clinical isolates.     

Multicentre evaluation of the in vitro activity of linezolid in the Western Pacific

Multiresistance to antimicrobial agents is common in staphylococci and pneumococci isolates in the Western Pacific region. The activity of linezolid, a new oxazolidinone, was evaluated against a spectrum of Gram-positive species collected in the region. Eighteen laboratories from six countries in the Western Pacific examined the linezolid susceptibility of 2143 clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and Enterococcus spp. using broth microdilution or disc diffusion methodology. For Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 351) and other streptococci (n = 83), Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) strips were used. Results were compared with other common and important antimicrobials. Linezolid-resistant strains were not detected among streptococci or staphylococci, including a significant proportion of S. aureus strains that were multiresistant. Almost all enterococci, including 14 vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, were linezolid susceptible. A small proportion of enterococci (0.8%) were intermediate to linezolid, and one strain of Enterococcus faecalis had a zone diameter of 20 mm (resistant). The linezolid MIC ranges (MIC(90)) of those strains tested by broth microdilution or Etest were: 1-4 mg/L (2 mg/L) for S. aureus, 0.5-4 mg/L (2 mg/L) for CoNS, 0.5-4 mg/L (2 mg/L) for Enterococcus spp., 0.12-2 mg/L (1 mg/L) for S. pneumoniae and 0.25-2 mg/L (1 mg/L) for Streptococcus spp. There was no difference in linezolid susceptibility between countries or between multiresistant and susceptible strains of each species monitored.     

In Vitro Activity of TR-700, the Active Ingredient of the Antibacterial Prodrug TR-701, a Novel Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agent

TR-701 is the prodrug of the microbiologically active molecule TR-700, a novel orally and intravenously administered oxazolidinone antibacterial agent. The in vitro activity of TR-700 was evaluated against 1,063 bacterial clinical isolates including staphylococci, enterococci, streptococci, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae, and a variety of anaerobic bacterial species. The test strains were recent (2005 to 2008) clinical isolates from diverse U.S. (80%) and non-U.S. (20%) sites. MIC assays were conducted using reference broth microdilution and agar dilution methods with the principal comparators linezolid and vancomycin. TR-700 was four- to eightfold more potent than linezolid against staphylococci and generally fourfold more potent against enterococci and streptococci. TR-700 was less active against M. catarrhalis and H. influenzae but was twofold more active than linezolid. Against anaerobic species, the activity of TR-700 was equivalent to or up to fourfold higher than that of linezolid. These results indicate that TR-700 is a promising new oxazolidinone antibacterial agent with greater in vitro potency than linezolid against clinically important gram-positive bacteria.Until the mid-1990s, methicillin (meticillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incidence was confined to the hospital setting (hospital-acquired MRSA [HA-MRSA]). However, in many medical centers throughout the United States, community-acquired strains of MRSA (CA-MRSA) have increased in frequency of isolation and have spread at an alarming rate, now reaching >60% incidence, primarily in skin and skin structure infections (8). This has led to an important change in the choice of antibiotics in the management of community-acquired infections. Initially, CA-MRSA isolates were more susceptible than HA-MRSA to classes of antimicrobial agents such as tetracyclines, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, or quinolones (12). This difference in susceptibility profile is now diminishing as CA-MRSA strains tend to present a profile closer to that of HA-MRSA isolates, as reported for tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (15). Furthermore, it has been shown that clinical and epidemiological characteristics are not reliable for distinguishing between methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA skin infections (11). As a result, there is a need for new intravenous (i.v.) and oral (p.o.) agents active against gram-positive bacterial infections that can be used for both inpatient and outpatient therapy.For treating multidrug-resistant gram-positive bacteria, only linezolid currently offers the versatility of both i.v. and p.o. administration, enabling an i.v.-to-p.o. step-down approach. Linezolid displays high bioavailability, an acceptable safety profile, and excellent rates of clinical efficacy. However, linezolid is administered twice daily, and although the effect is reversible after discontinuation, mild myelosuppression is commonly observed after 10 to 14 days of therapy, requiring regular blood cell monitoring. In addition, enterococcal and staphylococcal strains resistant to linezolid have surfaced (6), including some staphylococcal isolates containing transposon-associated or plasmid-borne resistance (5, 7, 10). As a result, there is a need for a new agent with the potential to (i) be administered in a once-daily regimen; (ii) provide a broader safety margin, particularly with a lower myelosuppression potential at the therapeutic dose; and (iii) treat infections caused by organisms that have developed resistance to linezolid.TR-701 (formerly DA-70218 and DA-7218) is a prodrug of the active oxazolidinone antibiotic TR-700 (formerly DA-7157 and 70157) that has completed phase 2 clinical development for complicated skin and skin structure infections. Data from phase 1 studies showed that TR-701 is rapidly absorbed and converted to TR-700, with a mean half-life ranging from 8 to 11 h, approximately twofold longer than that of linezolid and consistent with once-a-day dosing (1). Examination of hematologic parameters over 21 days demonstrated that the 200-mg once-a-day projected therapeutic human dose of TR-701 did not demonstrate any hematological effects and was comparable to placebo (13).The microbiologically inactive prodrug TR-701 can be administered i.v. or p.o. and is readily converted to the microbiologically active form TR-700 by phosphatases. In previous studies, the activity of TR-700 was examined against a collection of Korean clinical isolates (2002 to 2004) (2, 9). TR-700 was four- to eightfold more potent than linezolid against both S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant strains. Similarly, TR-700 was two- to fourfold more potent than linezolid against both vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant enterococci. In a recent study evaluating the activity of TR-700 against linezolid-resistant isolates, TR-700 demonstrated 8- to 16-fold-greater potency than linezolid against all linezolid-resistant strains tested, including MRSA, strains of MRSA carrying the mobile cfr methyltransferase gene, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (14). The purpose of our study was to assess the activity of TR-700 against recent clinical isolates of predominantly gram-positive bacteria isolated from non-Korean sites.(This study was presented in part at the 47th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Chicago, IL, 2007.)