Adult recipients of matched related donor blood cell transplants given myeloablative regimens including pretransplant antithymocyte globulin have lower mortality related to graft-versus-host disease: a matched pair analysis.

Because pretransplantation anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) seems to reduce graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) and treatment-related mortality (TRM) after unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we investigated this agent in matched related donor (MRD) blood cell transplantation (BCT). Fifty-four adults receiving rabbit ATG, cyclosporine A, and methotrexate with myeloablative conditioning and undergoing first MRD BCT were matched for disease and stage with 54 patients not given ATG. Most ATG-treated patients had fludarabine with oral (7) or i.v. busulfan (46) with total body irradiation (TBI) in 10. Control patients largely received TBI with VP16 (28) or oral busulfan with cyclophosphamide (15) or fludarabine (7). The ATG was given at a total dose of 4.5 mg/kg over 3 d, finishing on day 0. Rates of acute GVHD (aGVHD) grade II-IV, aGVHD grade III-IV, and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were 19 +/- 5% versus 32 +/- 6% (P = .1), 6 +/- 3% versus 13 +/- 5% (P = NS), and 55 +/- 8% versus 96 +/- 3% (P = .002) in the ATG and control groups, respectively. Patients given ATG had fewer sites involved by cGVHD compared with the control group (mean 2.1 +/- 0.2 versus 2.8 +/- 0.2, P = .04). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) with and without ATG, respectively, was 4 +/- 3% versus 17 +/- 5% at 100 d and 9 +/- 4% versus 34 +/- 7% at 4 yr (P = .002). Deaths were GVHD related in 3 ATG-treated patients versus 14 controls (P = .007). Despite a trend to more relapse with ATG (43 +/- 7% versus 22 +/- 7% at 4 yr, P = 0.05), survival was 66 +/- 7% in the patients given ATG versus 50 +/- 7% in the controls (P = 0.046). This study indicates that myeloablative regimens incorporating fludarabine and oral or i.v. busulfan with pretransplantation ATG given to recipients undergoing MRD BCT may result in less cGVHD, lower TRM, and probably improved quality of life in survivors compared with previous protocols.     

Absolute lymphocyte count on day 30 is a surrogate for robust hematopoietic recovery and strongly predicts outcome after T cell-depleted allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Several studies have shown that a higher lymphocyte count 3-4 weeks after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is associated with better transplant outcome. However, the factors determining early lymphocyte recovery are not defined. To further explore the relationship between lymphocyte recovery and outcome we analyzed lymphocyte counts and other engraftment parameters in 157 patients with leukemia (48 acute myelogenous leukemia, 80 chronic myelogenous leukemia, and 29 acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL]) receiving T cell-depleted myeloablative SCT from an HLA-identical sibling. In multivariate analysis the day 30 absolute lymphocyte count (LC30) above the median of 450/muL was associated with improved survival (71% +/- 5% versus 38% +/- 6%, P < .0001), less relapse (21% +/- 5% versus 44% +/- 7%, P = .009), less nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 9 +/- 3 versus 36% +/- 6%, P < .0001) and less acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (34% +/- 5% versus 51% +/- 6%, P = .025). The beneficial effect of a higher LC30 influenced outcome in patients with both standard and high-risk disease but did not affect survival and relapse in ALL. We found that a higher LC30 correlated with higher lymphocyte counts at all time points between 30 and 90 days post-SCT and also with more rapid neutrophil and platelet engraftment. These results indicate that LC30 is a surrogate for robust engraftment and identifies an "at-risk" population of patients after T cell-depleted SCT.     

Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes.

The availability of an i.v. form of busulfan (Bu) has prompted investigation of administration schedules other than the 4-times-daily dosage commonly used with oral Bu. We have studied an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) preparative regimen comprising fludarabine (FLU) 50 mg/m2 on days -6 to -2 plus i.v. Bu 3.2 mg/kg daily in a 3-hour infusion on days -5 to -2. The regimen was given to 70 patients aged 15 to 64 years (median, 41 years) with hematologic malignancy. Thirty-six patients (51%) had high-risk malignancy, 28 (40%) had unrelated or genotypically mismatched related donors (alternate donors [AD]) and 29 (41%) received bone marrow rather than blood as stem cell source. Acute GVHD prevention comprised antithymocyte globulin 4.5 mg/kg over 3 days pretransplantation, cyclosporin A, and short-course methotrexate with folinic acid. Hepatic toxicity was transient and there was no clinically diagnosed veno-occlusive disease. Grade II stomatitis occurred in 49 patients (70%) and hemorrhagic cystitis in 9 patients (13%). One patient with subtherapeutic phenytoin levels had a convulsion 8 hours after the third i.v. Bu dose, but no other neurotoxicity was apparent. Incidence of acute GVHD grades II to IV was 8% and incidence of grade III-IV was 3%, with no deaths from this cause. Actuarial incidence of chronic GVHD at 2 years is 38%. There were 2 cases of graft failure in unrelated donor BMT recipients, 1 of which was reversed by asecond transplantation. With a median follow-up of 16 months (range, 6-27 months), transplantation-related mortality at 100 days and 2 years was 2% and 5% for matched related donor (MRD) SCT and 8% and 19% for AD SCT, respectively (P = not significant). Relapse rates were 21% for 34 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission or chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (low-risk), 66% for 19 patients with high-risk AML, and 18% for 17 patients with other active malignancy. Projected disease-free and overall survival rates at 2 years were 74% and 88% for low-risk disease, 26% and 37% for advanced AML, and 65% and 71% for other high-risk disease, respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies were done using 11 samples with the first and fourth doses of Bu. Kinetics were linear, and for the first and fourth doses, the half-lives were 2.60 +/- 0.44 and 2.57 +/- 0.36 hours, respectively. Clearances were 106.77 +/- 16.68 and 106.86 +/- 21.57 mL/min per m2, peak concentrations (Cmax) were 3.92 +/- 0.31 and 3.96 +/- 0.28 mcg/mL, and Bu areas under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) were 4866.51 +/- 771.42 and 4980 +/- 882.80 microM x min, respectively. Bu was completely cleared within 24 hours and the day 4 pharmacokinetic values were very similar to those on day 1 for every patient. The cumulative AUC was comparable to the target range established for p.o. Bu. This regimen incorporating once-daily i.v. Bu is convenient to give, is relatively well tolerated, gives predictable blood levels, and deserves further study in circumstances in which cytoreduction as well as immune suppression is needed.     

Unrelated cord blood transplantation in adult and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia: effect of minimal residual disease on relapse and survival

Data on pretransplantation minimal residual disease (MRD) and outcomes of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) are limited. Out of the 143 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent UCBT at the University of Minnesota between 2004 and 2010, we evaluated 86 patients with available MRD assessment data by 4- and 8-color flow cytometry analysis immediately before transplantation. Ten patients (11.6%) were MRD-positive, and 76 were MRD-negative (88.4%). Most of the patients (82%) received myeloablative conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. In multivariate analysis, age, disease status (complete remission [CR] 1 versus CR2/CR3), disease group (precursor B cell ALL versus Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL versus T cell ALL), and time to transplantation had no impact on relapse. Patients with MRD before UCBT had a greater incidence of relapse at 2 years (relapse rate, 30%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-56%) and lower 3-year disease-free survival (30%; 95% CI, 7%-58%) compared with those without MRD (relapse rate, 16%; 95% CI, 8%-25%; P = .05; disease-free survival, 55%; 95% CI, 43%-66%; P = .02). Our data suggest that in patients with ALL, achieving an MRD-negative state before UCBT improves outcomes.     

Comparative Analysis of Calcineurin Inhibitor–Based Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil–Containing Regimens for Prevention of Graft-versus-Host Disease after Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Transplantation

The combination of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) such as tacrolimus (TAC) or cyclosporine (CYSP) with methotrexate (MTX) or with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been commonly used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), but there are limited data comparing efficacy of the 2 regimens. We evaluated 1564 adult patients who underwent RIC alloHCT for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) from 2000 to 2013 using HLA-identical sibling (matched related donor [MRD]) or unrelated donor (URD) peripheral blood graft and received CYSP or TAC with MTX or MMF for GVHD prophylaxis. Primary outcomes of the study were acute and chronic GVHD and overall survival (OS). The study divided the patient population into 4 cohorts based on regimen: MMF-TAC, MMF-CYSP, MTX-TAC, and MTX-CYSP. In the URD group, MMF-CYSP was associated with increased risk of grade II to IV acute GVHD (relative risk [RR], 1.78; P < .001) and grade III to IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.93; P = .006) compared with MTX-TAC. In the URD group, use of MMF-TAC (versus MTX-TAC) lead to higher nonrelapse mortality. (hazard ratio, 1.48; P = .008). In either group, no there was no difference in chronic GVHD, disease-free survival, and OS among the GVHD prophylaxis regimens. For RIC alloHCT using MRD, there are no differences in outcomes based on GVHD prophylaxis. However, with URD RIC alloHCT, MMF-CYSP was inferior to MTX-based regimens for acute GVHD prevention, but all the regimens were equivalent in terms of chronic GVHD and OS. Prospective studies, targeting URD recipients are needed to confirm these results.     

Incidence and outcome of chronic graft-versus-host disease using National Institutes of Health consensus criteria.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), a common complication after stem cell transplant (SCT), has an impact on morbidity and survival. Previous classification of cGVHD has not been reproducible or prognostic for nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Recently the National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria were proposed, but the ability of this classification to predict outcome of various subtypes of cGVHD is unknown. Patients (N = 110) undergoing an SCT for a hematologic malignancy and surviving until day 100 posttransplant from 2001 to 2003 were studied. The overall survival (OS) using a landmark analysis at day 100 was 44% versus 66% (no GVHD vs. GVHD, P = .026). The OS of patients with various types of GVHD as proposed by the NIH criteria were significantly different (P < .0001). In a univariate analyses, this was more apparent when patients with any acute features of GVHD were compared to classic cGVHD (3-year OS 46% vs. 68%, P = .033). The 3-year NRM for the entire cohort was 21%, and was not affected by presence or absence of GVHD or subtypes of GVHD. In a multivariable analysis, extensive cGVHD (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35, P = .015) and having any acute feature of GVHD after day 100 (HR 3.36, P = .0144) were significant independent predictors of survival. The OS with different NIH subtypes of GVHD after day 100 from SCT varies, and is superior for patients with classic cGVHD.     

Sequential Conditioning with Thiotepa in T Cell- Replete Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Refractory Hematologic Malignancies: Comparison with Matched Related,Haplo-Mismatched,and Unrelated Donors

The results of conventional allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in refractory hematologic malignancies are poor. Sequential strategies have shown promising results in refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), but have not been validated in a haploidentical (Haplo) transplant setting. We have developed a new sequential approach combining chemotherapy with broad antitumor activity (thiotepa 10?mg/kg, etoposide 400?mg/m², and cyclophosphamide 1600?mg/m² from day -15 to day -10), followed after 3 days of rest by a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (fludarabine 150?mg/m², i.v. busulfan 6.4?mg/kg, and thymoglobulin 5?mg/kg from day -6 to day -2). High-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide was added in cases with Haplo donors. Seventy-two patients (median age, 54 years) with a refractory hematologic malignancy (44 with acute myelogenous leukemia, 7 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, 15 with myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasms, and 6 with lymphomas) were included in this retrospective multicenter study. Donors were Haplo (n?=?27), matched related (MRD; n?=?16), and unrelated (UD; n?=?29). With a median follow-up of 21 months, the 2-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 54.7% and 49.3%, respectively, in recipients of Haplo transplants, 49.2% and 43.8%, respectively, in recipients of MRD transplants, and 37.9% and 28%, respectively, in recipients of UD transplants. Compared with UD, the outcomes were improved in Haplo in terms of the incidences of acute grade II-IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (11.1% versus 41.4%; P?<?.001) and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (44.4 versus 10.3%; P?=?.022). These results support the safety and efficacy of a thiotepa-based sequential approach in allogeneic SCT with a Haplo donor with post-transplantation immune modulation. Thus, in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies, there seems to be no benefit in searching for a UD when a Haplo donor is readily available.     

Transplantation from Matched Siblings Using Once-Daily Intravenous Busulfan/Fludarabine with Thymoglobulin: A Myeloablative Regimen with Low Nonrelapse Mortality in All But Older Patients with High-Risk Disease

Two hundred patients received hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched sibling donors (MSD) after myeloablative conditioning including fludarabine (Flu) and once-daily intravenous busulfan (Bu). Thymoglobulin (TG) was added to methotexate (MTX) and cyclosporine (CsA) as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. For low-risk (acute leukemia CR1/CR2, CML CP1) patients projected 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were 4% and 76% for those ≤45 years old (n = 54) and 6% and 83% for those >45 (n = 31). For high-risk (HR) patients NRM was 6% versus 27% (18% at 1 year) (P = .04) and OS 64% versus 37% (P = .47) in younger (n = 40) and older (n = 75) patients, respectively. To correct for imbalance in HR diagnoses each of 17 younger HR patients were matched with 2 older HR (OHR) patients by diagnosis and details of stage, and thereafter for other risk factors. For the younger HR and OHR patients, respectively, OS was 70% versus 37% (P = .02) and NRM 0 versus 34% (P = .02). When outcomes of OHR patients were compared with the other 3 groups combined NRM was 27% versus 5%, respectively (P = .002). Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) grade II-IV, aGVHD grade III-IV, and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was 23% versus 10% (P = .02), 4% versus 2% (P = ns), and 66% versus 41% (P = .001), respectively. Nine of 14 nonrelapse deaths in the OHR group were related to GVHD or its treatment compared with 3 of 6 in all others (P value for GVHD related death = .01). Multivariate analysis of OS and DFS correcting for potentially confounding pretransplant factors identified only the OHR patients as having significantly increased risk (relative risk [RR] 3.32, confidence interval [CI] 1.71-6.47, P < .0001, and RR 3.32, CI 1.71-6.43, P < .0001, respectively). The effect of age on NRM is only apparent in HR patients, and is not explained by heterogeneity in diagnoses. Older HR patients experience more GVHD and more GVHD-related death than others, but NRM is no higher than reported with many nonmyeloablative regimens.     

Low-Dose Anti-T Lymphoglobulin as Prophylaxis for Graft-versus-Host Disease in Unrelated Donor Transplantations for Acute Leukemias and Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major complication after stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Several randomized studies already demonstrated that anti-T lymphoglobulin (ATLG) is effective in preventing GVHD after myeloablative unrelated and HLA-identical sibling transplants. However, the issue of doses and the potential increase of relapses still remain unsolved. Here we report data on 190 patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome who underwent an unrelated HSCT with low-dose ATLG (15 to 30 mg/kg) given at an earlier timing (days –6 to –2). HSCT was performed from HLA 10/10 (n?=?62, 33%), 9/10 (n?=?91, 48%), 8/10 (n?=?30, 16%), and <8/10 (n?=?7, 4%) identical unrelated donor. Peripheral blood was the stem cell source in 42% (n?=?80). Median follow-up was 51 months. Grades II to IV and III to IV acute GVHD were 26% and 9%, respectively, and 2-year overall and moderate to severe cGVHD were 23% and 14%, respectively. The 3-year incidences of relapse and nonrelapse mortality were 26% and 18%, respectively. The rates of 3-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) were 60%, 56% and 44%, respectively. Factors such as younger donor, good performance status, and early disease were associated with better outcome in terms of OS, DFS, and GRFS. Our data indicate that doses of ATLG lower that those used in randomized clinical trials can be used for GVHD prevention, even in the adult setting, without clear increases in relapse and infections; these findings need to be further validated by a prospective randomized study.     

Outcome of Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation by Donor Graft CD3+/Tregs Ratio: A Single-Center Experience

The therapeutic efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for hematological malignancies relies largely on the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects exerted by the donor CD3 cells, but there is a risk of onset of uncontrolled graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Regulatory T cells (Tregs) (CD4+CD25^high Foxp3+) are believed to maintain tolerance and to inhibit acute GVHD (aGVHD) after allogeneic PBSCT. Nevertheless, when looking at post-allotransplantation patient outcomes, although the impact of aGVHD on survival is amply documented, so far there is no evidence that the donor graft CD3/Tregs ratio may affect overall survival (OS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse rates. Our aim was to study the possible impact of the gCD3/Tregs ratio on survival after myeloablative allogeneic PBSCT. We analyzed 74 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (n = 62), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (n = 10), and chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 2) who underwent transplantation with unmanipulated PBSCs from a human leukocyte antigen–identical related donor (n = 48) or a human leukocyte antigen–identical unrelated donor (n = 26). Patients were subdivided into a high gCD3/Tregs ratio (≥36) group (HR group, n = 30) and a low gCD3/Tregs ratio (<36) group (LR group, n = 44). The OS, DFS, NRM, and relapse rates at 3 years were 53%, 51%, 29%, and 34%, respectively. Comparing the LR and HR groups, a statistically significant difference was demonstrated for the 3-year OS, DFS, and NRM rates (65% vs 31%, P = .0001; 67 versus 26%, P = .0001; 5% versus 71%, P < .0001, respectively) but not for relapse (30% vs 25%, P = ns). By multivariate analysis, LR significantly predicted better OS (P = .019), DFS (P = .003), and NRM (P = .05), whereas there was no statistically significant association between LR and relapse (P = .155). Overall, our data may suggest that LR preserves GVL effects but is also protective against aGVHD in allotransplantation patients.     

Allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation using reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning regimens for the treatment of leukemia

Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) have allowed the application of transplantation to older patients and to patients with underlying medical problems. Between October, 1999, and June, 2003, 61 patients with acute leukemia or chronic myeloid leukemia received allogeneic peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from HLA-identical siblings. Thirty-four were conditioned with myeloablative protocols and twenty-seven with RIC regimens. The patients in the myeloablative group were younger (29 vs. 37 years; p < 0.0003), most of them were transplanted in complete remission (74% vs. 59%; p < 0.03), had a shorter interval between diagnosis and HSCT (12 vs. 21 months; p < 0.02) and a greater proportion belonged to standard-risk prognosis (68% vs. 48%; p < 0.1). The median times to neutrophil, platelet and red blood cell engraftment for the myeloablative and RIC groups were 14 versus 11 days (p < 0.009), 17 versus 9 days (p < 0.0001), and 19 versus 12 days (p < 0.007), respectively. Transfusion requirements were lower in the RIC group. Severe mucositis was present in 32% and 7%, respectively (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients having acute graft versus-disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, and infections was the same, as well as early and late mortality, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Analyzing all the patients together, three factors significantly influenced overall survival: standard risk patients, complete remission at transplant, and the absence of severe acute GVHD. In conclusion, our data suggest that even in high-risk patients, RIC transplantation seems to be as useful as ablative HSCT.     

Ex Vivo T Cell-Depleted Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia in First and Second Remission: Long-Term Disease-Free Survival with a Significantly Reduced Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Large series of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) after ex vivo T cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) have not been reported previously. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 266 patients (median age, 54 years) with AML who received CD34-selected TCD allo-HSCTs while in first (75%) or second (25%) complete remission (CR1/CR2) at a single institution. The conditioning regimens were all myeloablative, and no additional graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was given. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at 180 days were 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 18%) and 3% (95% CI, 1% to 5%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 3 years was 3% (95% CI, 1% to 6%). The 3-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 21% (95% CI, 16% to 26%) and that of relapse was 21% (95% CI, 17% to 27%). Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1, 3, and 5 years were 75%, 61%, and 56% and 68%, 57%, and 53%, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS, DFS, and relapse rates for patients who underwent transplantation in CR1 and those who did so in CR2. However, patients with high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis had significantly poorer outcomes. The OS and DFS rates compare favorably with those for unmodified allo-HSCT, but with considerably lower rates of GVHD.     

T Cell–Depleted Stem Cell Transplantation for Adults with High-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Long-Term Survival for Patients in First Complete Remission with a Decreased Risk of Graft-versus-Host Disease

Consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) provides a survival benefit to patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We have previously reported comparable survival and relapse rates after T cell–depleted (TCD) allo-HSCT compared with unmodified transplantations for acute myelogenous leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma with significantly decreased graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We performed a 56-patient retrospective study to evaluate TCD allo-HSCT for the treatment of ALL after myeloablative total body irradiation–based therapy. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates for patients with ALL after TCD allo-HSCT were 0.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.52) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.19-0.44), respectively, and the 2-year and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 0.38 (95% CI, 0.25-0.50) and 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.44). There was a trend toward improved survival of patients who underwent TCD allo-HSCT in first complete remission compared with those who did so in other remission states. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD at 1 year was 0.20 (95% CI, 0.10-0.31), and no patients developed grade IV acute GVHD. The cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD in 41 evaluable patients at 2 and 5 years was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.04-0.26), and that of extensive chronic GVHD at 2 and 5 years was 0.05 (95% CI, 0-11.6). We demonstrate OS and DFS rates that compare favorably to unmodified allo-HSCT with lower rates of GVHD.     

A prospective multicenter trial of peripheral blood stem cell sibling allografts for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission using fludarabine-cyclophosphamide reduced intensity conditioning.

The role of allogeneic transplantation in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission (AML-CR1) is controversial. Aiming to preserve a graft-versus-leukemia effect, but minimize morbidity and mortality from conditioning-related toxicity and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), we conducted a prospective multicenter study of reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) as preparation for peripheral blood stem cell sibling allografts in patients with intermediate or poor risk AML-CR1. Conditioning consisted of fludarabine 125 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 120 mg/kg. Thirty-four patients were transplanted with a median age of 45 years; 85% had intermediate risk cytogenetics. Early toxicity was minimal. The overall incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD was low (21%), but the 3 patients (9%) who developed grade IV GVHD died. Donor T cell chimerism was rapid and generally complete, but complete myeloid chimerism was delayed. Thirteen patients (38%) relapsed, 12 within a year of transplant. The estimated disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival at 2 years was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI] 39%-71%) and 68% (95% CI 50%-81%), respectively. The incidence of extensive chronic GVHD (cGVHD) was low (24% of surviving patients at 12 months) and most survivors had an excellent performance status. These observations justify a prospective comparison of RIC versus myeloablative conditioning allografts for AML-CR1.     

CD3+ cell dose and disease status are important factors determining clinical outcomes in patients undergoing unmanipulated haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation after conditioning including antithymocyte globulin.

Haploidentical transplantation is a feasible alternative for patients with life-threatening hematologic diseases who lack a matched donor. Factors affecting the clinical outcomes of haploidentical transplantation remain under investigation. We analyzed 157 consecutive patients with leukemia who underwent transplantation with nonmanipulated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized marrow and peripheral blood cells (G-BMPBs) from haploidentical donors after receiving myeloablative chemotherapy (Ara-C + BuCy + antithymocyte globulin). Follow up observations after transplantation were made from 48 days to 1191 days (median, 448 days). Multivariate analysis indicated that the cohort given higher doses of CD3(+) cells (> or = 177 x 10(6) /kg) in allograft transplantation had a significantly lower treatment-related mortality (TRM) (relative risk [RR] = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.16-0.77; P = .0090), better leukemia-free survival (LFS) (RR = 0.46; 95% CI = 0.26-0.84; P = .0106), and better overall survival (OS) (RR = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.23-0.78; P = .0058). Inversely, advanced-stage disease was a strong predictor of greater posttransplantation relapse (RR = 3.48; 95% CI = 1.26- 9.60; P = .0159), worse LFS (RR = 2.56; 95% CI = 1.33-4.95; P = .0050), and worse OS (RR = 2.77; 95% CI = 1.39-5.53; P = .0038). A high number of CD3(+) cells (> 177 x 10(6)/kg) given to patients resulted in statistically less TRM and more intensive graft versus leukemia effect without producing more severe grades of GVHD, all resulting in a significantly better overall clinical outcome from haploidentical transplantation.     

Thrombotic microangiopathy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the era of reduced-intensity conditioning: The incidence is not reduced.

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is one of the most severe complications of stem cell transplantation (SCT). Endothelial cell injury caused by the toxic effects of high-dose chemoradiotherapy is likely the primary event in pathogenesis. The incidence, clinical settings, and risk factors for TMA in the era of nonmyeloablative conditioning have not been well defined. The data on 147 consecutive SCTs in a single center were collected, and patients with TMA were identified. Patient characteristics, response to therapy, and outcome were recorded, and risk factors were determined. TMA occurred in 22 of 147 transplantations, with a projected incidence of 20% +/- 4%. TMA occurred in 3 clinical settings: classic multifactorial TMA, TMA associated with severe hepatic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and TMA associated with second SCT, with a projected incidence of 8% +/- 3%, 73% +/- 14%, and 70% +/- 16% of patients at risk, respectively. TMA occurred after 23% +/- 6% of nonmyeloablative and 16% +/- 5% of myeloablative conditioning regimens (not significant). Univariate analysis determined SCT from unrelated donors, SCT during advanced or active disease, second SCT within 6 months of a prior SCT, and acute GVHD as risk factors for TMA. The last 2 factors remained significant in a multivariate model. Thirty-two percent of patients responded to therapy. The peri-TMA mortality rate was 68% +/- 10%. Six patients had diffuse alveolar hemorrhage complicating TMA. SCT-associated TMA is a relatively common complication with unsatisfactory therapy and grim prognosis. Fludarabine-based nonmyeloablative conditioning does not confer a lesser risk for TMA. This observation may relate to the selective use of these regimens in elderly and heavily pretreated patients or to the lack of reduction of GVHD with these regimens, and fludarabine itself may be involved in causing endothelial damage. Further exploration of novel preventive and therapeutic measurements is required in high-risk settings.     

Comparable outcome with T-cell-depleted unrelated-donor versus related-donor allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

To assess the effect of related versus unrelated donors on outcomes in patients following T-cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic BMT, we compared engraftment, GVHD, relapse rates, and survival in BMT patients who received CD6+ TCD marrow from HLA-matched related donors (MRD) with those in patients who received CD6+ TCD marrow from unrelated donors (URD). A total of 170 consecutive patients (120 with related donors, 50 with unrelated donors) were analyzed. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, prior cytomegalovirus exposure, and stage of disease at the time of transplantation. GVHD prophylaxis was identical in the 2 groups, with TCD as the only method of GVHD prophylaxis. The total number of nucleated, CD34+, CD33+, and CD6+ cells infused did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The median day to reach 500 x 10(6) neutrophils/L was 12 days for both related (range, 8-22 days) and unrelated (range, 9-23 days) graft recipients (P = .92). Incidence of grades 2 through 4 acute GVHD was higher in URD than in MRD recipients (42% versus 20%, P = .004). According to multivariable analysis results, donor source was the single most important factor influencing GVHD (P = .01). The 2-year estimated risk of relapse was 45.9% in MRD recipients compared to 25.7% in URD recipients (P = .06). Multivariable analysis revealed that the 2 most pertinent factors adversely affecting overall survival were advanced disease stage (P = .0002) and age greater than 50 years (P = .0003) at transplantation. There was no difference in relapse-free survival in URD and MRD recipients. We conclude that for patients undergoing TCD-BMT, use of unrelated marrow is associated with a higher risk of GVHD and other transplantation-related complications. However, these adverse events do not lead to inferior probability of relapse-free survival because they are accompanied by a reduction in relapse rates.     

A long-term follow-up report on allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory acute myelogenous leukemia: impact of cytogenetic characteristics on transplantation outcome.

The prognosis of patients with primary refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is poor. Our initial report suggested that some patients could achieve durable remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Herein, we update our initial experience and report further analysis of this group of patients to determine whether there are pre-SCT prognostic factors predictive of posttransplantation relapse and survival. We reviewed the records of 68 patients who consecutively underwent transplantation at the City of Hope Cancer Center with allogeneic SCT for primary refractory AML between July 1978 and August 2000. Potential factors associated with overall survival and disease-free survival were examined. With a median follow-up of 3 years, the 3-year cumulative probabilities of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and relapse rate for all 68 patients were 31% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20%-42%), 30% (95% CI, 18%-41%), and 51% (95% CI, 38%-65%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, the only variables associated with shortened OS and DFS included the use of an unrelated donor as the stem cell source (relative risk, 2.23 [OS] and 2.05 [DFS]; P =.0005 and.0014, respectively) and unfavorable cytogenetics before SCT (relative risk: 1.68 [OS] and 1.58 [DFS]; P =.0107 and.0038, respectively). Allogeneic SCT can cure approximately one third of patients with primary refractory AML. Cytogenetic characteristics before SCT correlate with transplantation outcome and posttransplantation relapse.     

Costs of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Comparison of Umbilical Cord Blood and Matched Related Donor Transplantation and the Impact of Posttransplant Complications

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a complex and costly procedure. Unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an alternative graft source for patients without matched related donors (MRD); however, costs of UCB HCT have not been described. We compared the costs of HCT within the first 100 days among recipients of MRD (myeloablative = 67, nonmyeloablative = 54) or UCB (myeloablative = 63, nonmyeloablative = 110) HCT. Cost and hospitalization data were obtained from the institutional accounting department. The 100-day probabilities of overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) were comparable among 4 transplant types; however, neutrophil recovery was delayed and graft failure was more likely in UCB recipients. The median cost per day survived (excluding costs of graft acquisition) was $1016 for myeloablative MRD, $2082 for myeloablative UCB, $612 for nonmyeloablative MRD, and $1156 for nonmyeloablative UCB recipients, respectively (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for important patient, disease, and HCT-related characteristics, as well as major post-HCT complications, factors associated with higher costs within the first 100 days were myeloablative UCB HCT (relative risk 1.3 [95% confidence intervals, 1.1-1.5] versus myeloablative MRD HCT), graft failure (1.8 [1.7-1.9]), need for dialysis (1.3 [1.1-1.5]) or mechanical ventilation (1.3 [1.2-1.4]) and total hospital stay in the highest tertile (>48 days; 2.1 [1.9-2.3]). The median cost per day survived for patients with graft failure was $6976 (versus $1105 for no graft failure), dialysis was $4764 (versus $1102 for no dialysis), and $5099 for mechanical ventilation (versus $977 for no mechanical ventilation). Within the first 100 days, the absolute costs of myeloablative and nonmyeloablative UCB are higher than myeloablative and nonmyeloablative MRD transplantation. These costs are primarily driven by severe posttransplant complications, graft failure, and prolonged inpatient stay. Strategies to enhance engraftment will decrease the costs of UCB transplantation.