Interdose elevation in plasma cortisol during chronic treatment with alprazolam but not lorazepam in the elderly.

Benzodiazepines (BZPs) have been shown to reduce hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity acutely in normal humans. In contrast, the effects of chronic BZP treatment on the HPA axis have not been well studied, especially in the geriatric population. This study examined the acute and chronic effects (3 weeks) of alprazolam and lorazepam on plasma cortisol in 68 subjects (60-83 years) who received 0.25 or 0.50 mg b.i.d. alprazolam, or 0.50 or 1.0 mg b.i.d. lorazepam, or placebo orally according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel design. Memory assessment and blood samples for plasma cortisol were obtained prior to the morning dose on days 0, 7, 14, and 21, and at 1, 2.5, and 5 h postdrug on days 0 and 21. Assessments of anxiety and depression were carried out at days 0, 7, 14, and 21 before drug administration. Plasma cortisol was affected compared to placebo only by the 0.5 mg alprazolam dose. During the first and the last day of treatment, there was a significant drop in cortisol at 2.5 h after alprazolam compared to placebo. The predose cortisol levels increased significantly during chronic alprazolam treatment, and correlations were found between these cortisol changes and changes in depression, anxiety, and memory scores. These findings suggest that even a short period of chronic treatment with alprazolam, but not lorazepam, may result in interdose HPA axis activation in the elderly, consistent with drug withdrawal. If confirmed, this effect may contribute to an increased risk for drug escalation and dependence during chronic alprazolam treatment.     

Alprazolam-reinforced medication use in outpatients with anxiety

The reinforcing effects of alprazolam were investigated in 14 patients who had generalized anxiety or panic disorder, but were not current users/abusers of other psychoactive substances. Using a double-blind outpatient choice procedure, color-coded alprazolam (0.5 mg) and placebo capsules were provided to patients for use ‘as needed’ in the treatment of anxiety symptoms. Comparisons of alprazolam and placebo during a 2 week sampling period in which placebo and alprazolam were available sequentially revealed no significant differences on measures of medication usage or anxiety levels, although alprazolam did increase subjective ratings of drug effects/side effects. During a 4 week choice period, alprazolam was strongly preferred over placebo in 11 out of 14 patients indicating that alprazolam functioned as a reinforcer. Medication usage ranged from zero to 4.0 mg alprazolam in a day. Variations in daily medication-use were positively correlated with anxiety level fluctuations for a majority of patients. For a majority of patients, the results indicate that alprazolam functioned as a reinforcer without accompanying signs of abuse or addiction.     

Opipramol for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled trial including an alprazolam-treated group

Opipramol, a drug widely prescribed in Germany, is a tricyclic compound with no reuptake-inhibiting properties. However, it has pronounced D2-, 5-HT2-, and H1-blocking potential and high affinity to sigma receptors (sigma-1 and sigma-2). In early controlled trials, anxiolytic effects were revealed. However, those studies were performed before the concept of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) was established. Because of the interesting receptor-binding profile and promising results of the early clinical trials, the authors performed a state-of-the-art placebo-controlled trial using alprazolam as an active control. Three hundred seven outpatients with GAD were included. After a 7-day single-blind placebo washout, patients were randomly assigned to receive either opipramol (final dose, 200 mg/day), alprazolam (2 mg/day), or placebo and were treated for 28 days. The efficacy of both active compounds was higher than the effects with placebo treatment. There were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05, according to the analysis of covariance) in the main outcome criterion (baseline-adjusted final means of an intent-to-treat analysis of the total scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety) and in secondary efficacy parameters, with global improvement of 47% for placebo and significantly more for opipramol (63%) and alprazolam (64%). Regarding safety and tolerability, no substantial differences in the number of adverse events observed between treatment groups were obvious. Sedation seemed more pronounced with alprazolam treatment than with opipramol or placebo. In this trial, it was demonstrated for the first time that opipramol, a strong but nonselective sigma site ligand, possesses anxiolytic efficacy superior to placebo in the treatment of GAD.     

Pregabalin: in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder

Pregabalin, the pharmacologically active S-enantiomer of 3-aminomethyl-5-methyl-hexanoic acid, is a structural analogue of GABA, although it is not active at GABA receptors, nor does it acutely alter GABA uptake or degradation.black triangle Pregabalin binds with high affinity to the alpha2-delta subunit protein of voltage-gated calcium channels in CNS tissues and acts as a presynaptic modulator of the excessive release, in hyperexcited neurons, of various excitatory neurotransmitters. Binding of pregabalin to the alpha2-delta subunit appears necessary for its demonstrable anxiolytic, analgesic and anticonvulsant activities in animal models.black triangle Oral pregabalin, typically at dosages of 300-600 mg/day, was superior to placebo and similar to lorazepam 6 mg/day, alprazolam 1.5 mg/day and venlafaxine 75 mg/day in improving anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Pregabalin had a rapid onset of anxiolytic activity relative to alprazolam and venlafaxine, which was evident after 1 week. Additionally, pregabalin (initial dosage 450 mg/day) was effective for the prevention of relapse of GAD over 34 weeks. Pregabalin was well tolerated during dosage escalation to fixed dosages (maximum 600 mg/day) over 7 days. Dizziness and somnolence, usually of mild to moderate severity, were the most common adverse events.black triangle The drug was not associated with a clinically significant medication withdrawal syndrome during a 1-week taper following 4 or 6 weeks' double-blind treatment.     

Alprazolam and diazepam in the treatment of generalized anxiety

In a 4-week double-blind study comparing alprazolam with diazepam treatments, 48 outpatients suffering from mild to moderate generalized anxiety were evaluated after a 5-day placebo washout, and then after 1, 2, and 4 weeks of treatment. The optimal therapeutic doses without excessive sedation averaged 2 mg for alprazolam and 15.8 mg for diazepam. Results from the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression Scale, a behavior checklist questionnaire, and a symptomatic patients' self-rating scale indicated that patients improved in both treatment groups. Results from the comparative phase suggest that diazepam is more efficient than alprazolam in the reduction of several symptoms of anxiety and depression in particular. Assuming that the first 2-week ratings depend on accuracy of dose adjustment and that week 4 ratings are an important evaluation of long-term efficacy, results from this study suggest that adequate control of anxiety is obtained more readily with diazepam and that symptoms of depression might benefit more from that drug. Few side effects were reported: mainly, drowsiness, tremor, light- headedness , and dry mouth. A toxic reaction to alprazolam, possibly allergic, was observed. Either alprazolam or diazepam appeared to be effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder, and the statistically significant differences between the two drugs were not clinically striking.     

Double-blind clinical assessment of alprazolam, a new benzodiazepine derivative, in the treatment of moderate to severe anxiety

This four-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessed the new benzodiazepine derivative alprazolam (Xanax) treatment of moderate to severe anxiety characteristic of anxiety neurosis. Sixty-two outpatients participated; 8 per cent of those taking drug and 52 per cent of those taking placebo discontinued participation due to side effects or lack of efficacy. The mean total daily alprazolam dose was 1.35 mg taken in divided doses. Alprazolam significantly improved scores on five anxiety rating scales--Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Physician's Global Impressions, Target Symptoms Record, Self-Rating Symptom Scale, and Patient's Global Impressions. Alprazolam patients experienced no clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory values; they reported drowsiness as the most frequent side effect. We conclude that alprazolam is an effective and safe anxiolytic agent.     

Alprazolam versus buspirone in the treatment of outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder

The efficacy and safety of alprazolam and buspirone for treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) were compared in a 6-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 94 outpatients. Mean daily doses at the end of the study were 1.9 mg alprazolam and 18.7 mg buspirone. As judged by the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Physician's Global Improvement Scale, and other efficacy scales, alprazolam and buspirone were similar in efficacy, but more effective than placebo, for treating anxiety and depression symptoms in these patients. Clinically important differences were noted between drugs in the onset of effect, with alprazolam producing rapid and sustained improvement within the first week of treatment and buspirone producing more gradual, continuous improvement throughout the study. Significantly more buspirone-treated than alprazolam-treated patients failed to complete the study, primarily because of side effects or inefficacy. No clinically important differences were noted between alprazolam and buspirone in side effects, vital signs, or laboratory test results. Alprazolam-treated patients most frequently reported central nervous system-related side effects (drowsiness and sedation), while buspirone-treated patients most frequently reported gastrointestinal system-related side effects (appetite disturbances and abdominal complaints).     

Bromazepam and diazepam in generalized anxiety: a placebo-controlled study with measurement of drug plasma concentrations

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 48 anxious outpatients with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of treatment with bromazepam (18 mg/day), diazepam (15 mg/day), or placebo, after a 1-week washout period. From week 1 onward both active drugs were superior to placebo in relieving anxiety symptoms. Bromazepam was found to be significantly more effective than diazepam with respect to the somatic anxiety factor and the total score for the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the fear/anxiety factor of the Patient's Self-Rating Symptom Scale. Plasma concentrations of diazepam plus active metabolites were correlated significantly (r = 0.60, p less than 0.05) with the percentage reduction in self-rating anxiety scores. Bromazepam plasma concentration measurements showed greater variability than those of diazepam and were not found to be correlated significantly with clinical response. It is suggested that the use of strict diagnostic criteria (1978 draft of the third edition of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), adequate sample sizes, and a 4-week study period gave increased sensitivity for the detection of significant differences between the two benzodiazepines.     

Influence of dosing regimen on alprazolam and metabolite serum concentrations and tolerance to sedative and psychomotor effects

The relationships between alprazolam and metabolite concentrations and CNS effects were determined in a double-blind placebo controlled four-way crossover trial in 16 normal male volunteers. Active drug treatments consisted of 4-day regimens of 4 mg alprazolam PO daily as 2 mg bid., 1 mg qid, and 0.25 mg each hour. On days 1 and 4, the kinetics, sedative and psychomotor effects were evaluated. Plasma concentrations of the 4- and α-hydroxy metabolites of alprazolam were less than 10% of unchanged alprazolam levels on both days. Accumulation of these metabolites and alprazolam was dependent on alprazolam half-life (11.6 h). Acute and chronic tolerance to the sedative and psychomotor effects was observed with all active drug treatments. All alprazolam treatments resulted in significantly greater sedation than placebo on days 1 and 4. However, on day 4, sedation was 16–36% less than observed on day 1, despite plasma concentrations 1.4–2.76 times the day 1 concentrations. Sedation from alprazolam was reduced in each successive study phase, suggesting a tolerance which was sustained during the 10-day washout between phases. By day 4, psychomotor performance was not different from placebo, indicating more complete development of tolerance than occurred for the sedative effect. Sedation and psychomotor impairment on day 1 were greatest with 2 mg alprazolam bid. During the initiation of therapy, the patient will likely experience less sedation and psychomotor impairment with smaller, more frequent doses. Since tolerance develops to these effects, the advantage of more frequent dosing regimen dissipates by the 4th day.     

曲唑酮治疗焦虑症

目的 :观察曲唑酮对焦虑症的疗效。方法 :选择符合CCMD 2 R诊断标准的焦虑症病例 90例(实际完成 87例 :男性 2 7例 ,女性 6 0例 ) ,随机分 3组 ,每组 30例 ,分别用曲唑酮 50～ 10 0mg·d- 1,po ,阿普唑仑 1.6mg·d- 1,po ,劳拉西泮 2mg·d- 1,po ,共观察 4wk。结果 :曲唑酮组的总有效率基本与其他 2组相仿 (P >0 .0 5) ,仅wk 4优于阿普唑仑组 (P <0 .0 5)。HAMA减分率与wk 1阿普唑仑组及各周劳拉西泮组差别无显著意义 (P >0 .0 5) ,但与wk 2 ,wk 4阿普唑仑组比较差别有显著和非常显著意义 (P <0 .0 5或P <0 .0 1)。药物副作用少而轻 ,以胃肠道不适和困倦感为主 ,仅 3例分别出现头痛伴焦虑、头晕伴烦躁不安、焦虑症状加重。结论 :曲唑酮是有效的抗焦虑药物 ,且副作用小。     

Effects of alprazolam and lorazepam on catecholaminergic and cardiovascular activity during supine rest,mental load and orthostatic challenge

Effects of oral alprazolam (0.5 and 1 mg) and lorazepam (2 mg) on sympathetic adrenomedullary activity and sedation were studied during supine rest, mental load (Color Word Test, CWT) and active standing (OCT), in 12 male volunteers in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design. Compared to placebo, alprazolam significantly increased subjective sedation, reduced plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations and mean blood pressure (MBP) during supine rest, and attenuated plasma adrenaline responses during the CWT and the OCT; these effects during the CWT and OCT appeared to be dose-dependent. In comparison with lorazepam (2 mg), alprazolam (1 mg) showed reduced MBP levels during supine rest, whereas lorazepam showed a higher heart rate level during supine rest, a reduced plasma noradrenaline response to the OCT and a performance deterioration to the CWT. There were no differences between alprazolam (1 mg) and lorazepam regarding subjective sedation. Although the benzodiazepines were similar regarding their increase of sedation, alprazolam and loraze- pam induced differential effects on sympathetic adrenomedullary activity during rest and stress, whereby suppression of adrenomedullary activity may be specific for alprazolam. Received: 13 March 1996 / Final version: 6 June 1996     

A comparative pharmacokinetic and dynamic evaluation of alprazolam sustained-release, bromazepam, and lorazepam

Sustained-release (SR) alprazolam may facilitate compliance with oral benzodiazepine treatment of panic disorders that currently requires doses administered three or four times daily. To compare the pharmacokinetic, psychomotor performance, and subjective effects of alprazolam SR (1.5 mg), bromazepam (3 mg taken three times daily), and lorazepam (1 mg taken three times daily), 13 male volunteers (aged 20-45 years) randomly received on four separate occasions one of these medications or placebo. Once before and 11 times after drug administration, the subjects were tested using psychomotor performance tests (manual tracking and digit-symbol substitution test [DSST]) and computerized questionnaires (such as the Tufts University Benzodiazepine Scale [TUBS], the Addiction Research Center Inventory, and the visual analog scales) to determine the subjective effects of the drugs. Blood samples for the determination of the plasma levels of the drugs were collected before and 17 times after the drug was administered. A peak plateau of plasma alprazolam began approximately 6 hours after the dose, which was later than the initial peaks for lorazepam and bromazepam (1-2 hours after the dose). Once this plateau had begun, alprazolam SR sustained that concentration better than did the other two formulations. Of the 10 measures on which the response averaged for the first 14 hours differed among drugs (p < 0.05), bromazepam differed from placebo on two measures, lorazepam on four (including DSST Performance and TUBS Sedation), and alprazolam SR on nine (including all four affected by lorazepam). Lorazepam and alprazolam, but not bromazepam, produced significantly more sedation than placebo. The doses of the three drugs were not equipotent in sedation and mood effects. None of the drugs tested differed from placebo on measures relevant to abuse liability.     

A fixed-dose study of alprazolam 2 mg, alprazolam 6 mg, and placebo in panic disorder.

A recently reported multinational, 8-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy of alprazolam versus placebo in the treatment of panic disorder indicated significant differences favoring alprazolam. We now report the results of a three-site, 6-week, double-blind, fixed-dose study comparing alprazolam 2 mg, alprazolam 6 mg, and placebo in 94 patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Both alprazolam treatment groups (6 mg and 2 mg) improved significantly more than did the placebo treatment group on most outcome measures. Only a few statistically significant differences between the 6 mg and 2 mg alprazolam groups were discerned, although the pattern of treatment response across measures suggested a dose effect. Dropouts in the placebo group were primarily due to lack of efficacy and in the alprazolam 6 mg group were due to side effects, which may have contributed to the limited differences between groups at study end. The findings suggest that many patients may require less than 6 mg of alprazolam per day for effective treatment of panic disorder.     

Pilot clinical trial of parenteral lorazepam (Temesta®) in anxiety states

The effects of IM and IV lorazepam were studied in an open trial and in a double-blind crossover trial in 13 and 15 adult patients respectively, all being inpatients suffering from psychic and somatic manifestations of anxiety. At a mean dosage of 5 mg t. i. d., lorazepam proved significantly superior to placebo in the treatment of acute anxiety as well as in chronic anxiety states. The side effects were minor; the main one was decreased wakefulness. The local and the biological tolerance were excellent.     

Duloxetine as an SNRI treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: results from a placebo and active-controlled trial

This study examined the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine 60-120 mg/day for the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder. This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, flexible-dose, placebo and active-controlled (venlafaxine extended-release 75-225 mg/day) trial designed to assess duloxetine 60-120 mg/day during 10 weeks of treatment in adults with Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-IV-defined generalized anxiety disorder. The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score assessed using analysis of covariance. A total of 487 patients were randomly assigned to duloxetine (n=162), venlafaxine XR (n=164), or placebo (n=161). Significantly greater improvement on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale total score occurred in the duloxetine (P=0.007) and venlafaxine XR (P<0.001) groups compared with the placebo group. Overall discontinuation rates did not differ among the three groups, but adverse event-related discontinuation was significantly higher in the duloxetine (14.2%, P<0.001) and venlafaxine XR (11.0%, P=0.001) groups than in the placebo group (1.9%). During the 2-week drug-tapering phase, discontinuation-emergent adverse events were significantly greater in the venlafaxine XR group (26.9%, P=0.04), but not in the duloxetine group (19.4%, P=0.448) compared with placebo (15.8%). Duloxetine 60-120 mg/day and venlafaxine XR 75-225 mg/day were each efficacious treatments for patients with generalized anxiety disorder.     

Alprazolam in the treatment of generalized anxiety and panic disorders: A double-blind placebo-controlled study

In a double-blind controlled study lasting 8 weeks, 50 anxious psychoneurotic outpatients with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety or panic disorder were randomly assigned to alprazolam (n=30), a new benzodiazepine, or placebo (n=20), after a washout period of 1 week. Alprazolam at dosages between 0.25 and 3 mg/day was found to be significantly better than placebo in the treatment of either disorder. The finding that alprazolam was effective in the treatment of panic disorder is of interest as this diagnostic category is usually treated with tricyclic antidepressants or MAO inhibitors.     

Double-blind comparison of alprazolam and adinazolam for panic and phobic disorders

Subjects primarily suffering from DSM-III panic disorders (agoraphobia with panic attacks, 13 subjects; panic disorder, one subject) were tested with two drug treatments after a baseline was established using single-blind placebo capsules three times daily for 1 week. Double-blind, 4-week crossover treatments were given with alprazolam, 0.5-6.0 mg/day, and adinazolam mesylate, 10-120 mg/day. Mean final doses in mg/day were 3.1 for alprazolam and 95.5 for adinazolam mesylate. Both were broadly effective in comparison with the baseline condition. Measures included self-rated symptoms and global impressions, physician-rated global impressions, and two forms of challenges, agoraphobic and noradrenergic. The two active drugs were highly similar in overall efficacy across the sample, but alprazolam was favored globally in six subjects, and adinazolam was favored globally in another six subjects. Only two subjects obtained maximal improvement ratings without side effects with both drugs. No diagnostic or demographic factor correlated with the differential in responses to the two active treatments. No clinically significant laboratory abnormalities occurred with either drug.     

Treatment of depressive outpatients with lorazepam,alprazolam, amytriptyline and placebo

This randomized double-blind study in 342 mildly to moderately depressive outpatients investigated the antidepressant effectiveness and speed of action of lorazepam, alprazolam and amitriptyline versus placebo. Six weeks of drug treatment were followed by a drug taper period, a control period with placebo and a control period without placebo, of 2 weeks duration each. Clinical improvement was assessed by rating scales (Clinical Global Impressions, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety) and patient's self-ratings (Patient's Global Impressions, Self-rating Depression Scale and Visual Analogue Scale). At the end of week 6 all active drugs showed similar efficacy which was significantly superior to placebo. Compared to placebo, onset of efficacy was earlier on benzodiazepines than on amitriptyline. While tapering by decreasing the dosage, replacing drug with placebo and finally discontinuing placebo, clear withdrawal phenomena were not seen, but 20% of patients, equally distributed to all treatment groups, did not want to stop taking tablets after replacing drug with placebo. Drop-out rate during the treatment period was very low (9%). Significantly interfering adverse effects were seen in 27 patients, without predominance in one of the active drug groups.     

Effects of alprazolam on cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide-induced panic and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis activity: a placebo-controlled study.

Cholecystokinin-tetrapeptide (CCK-4) induces panic attacks both in patients with panic disorder (PD) and healthy volunteers. It has been shown that panic elicited by CCK-4 is improved after treatment with antidepressants. Moreover, a reduction of CCK-4-induced panic has also been demonstrated after treatment with lorazepam in single subjects and after selective GABAergic treatment with vigabatrin. Although benzodiazepines are widely used as anxiolytics, no controlled study on the effects of benzodiazepines on CCK-4-induced panic symptoms is available so far. Therefore, we investigated the effects of alprazolam and placebo on CCK-4-induced panic symptoms in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A total of 30 healthy subjects were challenged with 50 microg CCK-4. Out of these 30 subjects, 26 showed a marked panic response to CCK-4. Subjects were rechallenged after a 7-day interval and treated with 1 mg alprazolam or placebo 1 h prior to the second CCK-4 challenge. Panic was assessed using the acute panic inventory (API) and a DSM-IV-derived panic symptom scale (PSS). Moreover, the number of reported symptoms and self-rated anxiety and arousal were recorded. We found a significant reduction of the API and PSS scores and of the number of reported symptoms compared to placebo. Moreover, compared to placebo the CCK-4-induced ACTH and cortisol release were significantly attenuated during the CCK-4 challenge after alprazolam treatment. However, also placebo treatment reduced CCK-4-induced anxiety and HPA-axis activation to a certain extent. In conclusion, our data show that alprazolam reduces CCK-4-induced panic, which supports the hypothesis of a possible interaction between the GABA and the CCK system.