Anatomical study of para-aortic and pelvic lymph nodes in gynecologic malignancies.

Between January 1986 and June 1990, systematic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 208 women with untreated ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the median number of nodes collected from each pelvic and para-aortic group and to verify a new detailed nomenclature for the various lymph node groups. The para-aortic nodes were distinguished as paracaval, precaval, and retrocaval, depending on their relationship with the vena cava. Para-aortic, pre-aortic, and retro-aortic nodes were located close to the aorta. The nodes situated between the vena cava and aorta were designated intercavo-aortic. A median of 26 (range 15-48) para-aortic nodes were collected during ovarian or endometrial cancer operations. The lymphatic system of the pelvis was divided into six groups, depending on the relationship with the pelvic blood vessels. The pelvic nodes were distinguished as common, internal and external iliac, presacral, obturator, and parametrial. In cases of cervical cancer, the median number of pelvic nodes collected was 38 (range 20-88). Such anatomical study of the lymphatic system shows that a higher number of nodes than expected can be found in the retroperitoneum.     

Feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy for cervical and endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-six patients underwent extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy between February 1999 and September 2005. The lymph nodes dissected with the laparoscopic procedure included the inframesenteric para-aortic lymph nodes, the sacral lymph nodes, and the bilateral common iliac lymph nodes. The extraperitoneal laparoscopic operation was performed with pelvic open surgery using Lap Disc to ensure the safety of patients. RESULTS: The number of patients with cervical and endometrial carcinoma was 36 and 40, respectively. The median age of patients was 51 years (range 24-75 years). Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 8 patients. These include 3 patients who encountered blood loss of 400, 136 and 128 ml; 2 extremely obese women; and 3 patients who had peritoneal tears causing CO2 gas leakage. Among the remaining 68 patients, the median operating time for extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy was 75 min (range 45-145 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 5 ml (range 5-138 ml). The median total number of resected nodes was 14 (range 2-31), and 4 patients had lymph node metastasis. No patient encountered postoperative complications attributable to extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic and common iliac lymphadenectomy with pelvic open surgery using Lap Disc is a feasible procedure, particularly in the surgeons learning phase.     

Early ovarian cancer: Is there a role for systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy?

Baiocchi G, Raspagliesi F, Grosso G, Fontanelli R, Cobellis L, di Re E, di Re F. Early ovarian cancer: Is there a role for systematic pelvis and para-aortic lymphadenectomy? Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8 : 103–108.
In order to focus on the incidence and the clinical significance of lymphatic spread in patients with cancer apparently confined to the ovaries, we present our 20 year experience in a large series of patients with early ovarian cancer who had systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A retrospective study of 280 consecutive patients is presented. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 205 cases (73.2%). Selective sampling and node biopsy were performed in 30 (10.7%) and 7 (2.5%), respectively. Node metastases were found in 32/242 patients (13.2%). The incidence of metastatic nodes was significantly higher in patients with serous adenocarcinomas and/or poorly-differentiated tumors. When few nodes were involved (1–3) lymphatic spread was most ipsilateral to the tumor. Even though the retrospective nature of the study has to be considered, univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in 5-year survival based on FIGO stage, histology, grade of differentiation, and node status. By contrast, using multivariate analysis, none of these risk factors was an independent variable for predicting long-term survival. However, node status closely approached the statistically significant level ( P = 0.06). Only prospective and randomized studies can clarify the role of lymphadenectomy in early ovarian cancer. However, while awaiting these results, this surgical procedure should be a part of a research protocol.     

Is common iliac lymph node dissection necessary in early stage cervical carcinoma?

OBJECTIVES: Nodal metastasis is one of the most important prognostic factors in early stage cervical carcinoma and has an immense impact on the subsequent management. Thus, searching for nodal metastasis by pelvic lymphadenectomy is an integral part in the surgical management of cervical carcinoma. Complete nodal clearance of lymphatic tissue up to 2 cm above the bifurcation of common iliac vessels is therefore performed as a routine in our unit. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence and pattern of pelvic lymph node metastases in patients with early stage cervical carcinoma to determine the role of common iliac node dissection in the surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 174 operation and histopathology reports of patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy because of stage IA2 to IIA cervical carcinoma. Lymph nodes collected below and above the bifurcation of common iliac vessels were labeled as pelvic nodes and common iliac nodes, respectively. The incidence and distribution of nodal metastases were analyzed. RESULTS: Complete and selective pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 163 and 11 patients, respectively. Nodal metastasis was documented in 35 (20.1%) patients. Pelvic and common iliac nodes were involved in 34 and 8 cases, respectively. All except one patient with common iliac node metastases were also found to have pelvic node metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: In early stage cervical carcinoma, isolated common iliac lymph node metastasis is rare, especially in cases without associated high risk factors. Less extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy may be considered in these patients in order to reduce operation morbidity and time.     

Lymph node pathway in the spread of endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the sentinel nodes of endometrial carcinoma, the spread pathway was clarified. The correlation between lymph node spread and other clinicopathological variables was also analyzed. METHODS: Dissected lymph node samples in 342 patients who underwent pelvic and selective paraaortic lymphadenectomy were reviewed. Pelvic and paraaortic node (PLN and PAN) status was compared with clinicopathological parameters. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was demonstrated in 52 patients, including 46 cases with PLN metastasis and six patients with independent PAN metastasis. The metastatic sites were most frequent in the obturator and internal iliac nodes. Eleven of 49 patients who underwent PAN dissection were positive for metastasis. Sixteen of 23 cases with parametrial metastasis also metastasized in the retroperitoneal lymph node. CONCLUSION: The lymph node spread pathway in endometrial carcinoma consists of a major route via the obturator node or internal iliac node with or without parametrial involvement, and rarely a direct PAN pathway.     

Three classes of pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with cervical cancer

Currently, the extent of pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy is currently described by numerous and ambiguous terms. The aim of this study is to present a classification of pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients. On the base of the data from the literature, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomies have been assigned to three different classes, depending on surgical technique, the extent of the lymphadenectomy and the specificity of the removed lymph node groups. Class I equals removal of selected lymph nodes; Class II: removal of lymph nodes situated ventrally and laterally to large extraperitoneal vessels and the obturator nerve and of lymph nodes situated ventrally and laterally to the aorta and vena cava; Class III: total removal of lymphatic tissue around the iliac vessels and from the obturator fossa dorsally to the obturator nerve and from the presacral region and lymphatic tissue around the aorta and vena cava. The presented classification allows for a unequivocal assessment of pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy.     

Incidence of metastasis in circumflex iliac nodes distal to the external iliac nodes in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer

Objective

The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence of metastasis in circumflex iliac nodes distal to the external iliac nodes (CINDEIN), which are also called suprainguinal nodes, in intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. Removal of these nodes needs to be discussed from the viewpoint of patient's quality of life because removal of CINDEIN is strongly related to lower extremity lymphedema.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was carried out for 508 patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer who were included in this study. We identified patients with lymph node metastasis. Lymph node sites were classified into four groups: (1) CINDEIN, (2) external iliac nodes, (3) Group A consisting of circumflex iliac nodes to the distal obturator nodes, internal iliac nodes, obturator nodes, cardinal ligament nodes (including deep obturator nodes), and sacral nodes, and (4) Group B consisting of common iliac nodes and para-aortic nodes. Logistic regression analysis was used to select risk factors for CINDEIN metastasis.

Results

In an analysis of 508 patients with intermediate- and high-risk disease, CINDEIN metastasis was found in fourteen (2.8%) of the patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed that high-risk histology (OR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.2-16.1) and Group A node metastasis (OR = 9.7, 95% CI = 2.9-31.4) were independent risk factors for CINDEIN metastasis. None of the patients with G1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma had CINDEIN metastasis. Three (2.5%) of the patients with G2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma had CINDEIN metastasis and all of these three patients had other pelvic node metastasis.

Conclusion

Removal of CINDEIN can be eliminated in patients with G1 endometrial cancer and patients with G2 endometrial cancer who have no pelvic node metastasis.     

盆腹腔淋巴取样术在子宫内膜癌手术中的临床意义

目的探讨盆腹腔淋巴取样术在子宫内膜癌的临床意义。方法分析2000年1月-2007年12月上海同济大学附属第一妇婴保健院手术治疗的213例子宫内膜癌患者,其中,86例行盆腹腔淋巴取样术,127例行淋巴结切除术。手术方式根据手术切除淋巴结的情况分为两组。①取样组：淋巴取样术,筋膜外全子宫双附件切除/次广泛子宫切除术＋盆腔/腹主动脉旁淋巴结取样术86例;②切除组：次广泛/广泛子宫切除术＋盆腔淋巴结切除/腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除术127例。结果取样组：切除淋巴结中位数18枚,淋巴结的转移10例。切除组：切除淋巴结中位数32枚,淋巴结转移11例。5年生存率分别为94.2%和94.5%。取样组无病发症发生,淋巴结切除组中有9例,分别是1例术中大出血（〉2000ml）,淋巴囊肿感染6例,淋巴漏2例。结论在子宫内膜癌中淋巴结取样术可准确了解淋巴结的转移情况,适宜手术分期,并不影响生存率,是避免过度手术减少并发症发生的有效方法。     

Role of lymphadenectomy in endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors associated with node involvement. Study design: In the period 1990-2008 a total of 265 endometrial cancers were treated in the Institut Universitari Dexeus. We analysed the rate of myometrial invasion, tumour grade, histological type and node involvement. RESULTS: Overall, 86% of tumours were endometrioid, 5.3% papillary serous, 4.9% mixed and 2.6% endometrial stroma sarcoma. Among those with endometrioid histology, lymphadenectomy was not performed (NL) in 85 cases (37.2%), whereas pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL) or pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL) was carried out in 84 (36.84%) and 59 patients (25.87%), respectively. In NL patients the overall disease-free survival (DFS) rate at five years was 92.8%. In the PL group, node involvement was observed in 2.4% of cases and the five-year DFS rate was 92.3%. Among PAL patients, 18.6% showed node involvement (72.7% positive pelvic nodes and 63.6% aortic). Aortic involvement was present in 5.9% of cases when there was no pelvic disease, whereas in the presence of positive pelvic nodes the rate of aortic involvement was 50%. The DFS rate at five years was 93.6%. Referring to the risk factors, when infiltration was > 50% of the myometrium, lymph node involvement occurred in 37% of cases and G3 tumors in 45.5%. Conclusions: Node involvement is more commonly observed in cases with > 50% myometrial invasion and G3, accounting for 25% of cases that can be considered as at-risk patients. When node involvement is present it is equally distributed between the pelvic and aortic levels. As node involvement is a predictive factor for distant metastasis, the 25% of patients considered to be at risk should undergo pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy     

Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer

Fanning S, Firestein S. Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8 : 270–273.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the morbidity of complete lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Eighty consecutive eligible patients with endometrial cancer underwent surgical staging consisting of total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, peritoneal cytology, complete bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and aortic lymphadenectomy. We prospectively evaluated operative time, blood loss, and morbidity of lymphadenectomy.
The median number of pelvic lymph nodes resected was 21 and aortic lymph nodes was 7. Median time of lymphadenectomy was 24 min. Median blood loss from lymphadenectomy was < 25 cc. There was one complication from lymphadenectomy. We conclude that, in this prospective study, complete pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer was performed quickly, with minimal blood loss and morbidity. In endometrial carcinoma surgical staging, the majority of operative time, blood loss, and morbidity is secondary to hysterectomy/oophorectomy rather than lymphadenectomy.     

Is aortic lymphadenectomy necessary in the management of endometrial carcinoma?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of aortic lymphadenectomy in the management of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: Clinical notes of 163 patients with endometrial carcinoma were reviewed. All patients had peritoneal cytology, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Seventy-five (46.0%) patients had pelvic lymphadenectomy alone whereas 88 (54.0%) had both pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy. Thirty-five (21.5%) patients had nodal metastases with positive pelvic and aortic nodes in 26 (16.0%) and 24 (27.3%) patients, respectively. Isolated aortic metastases were found in 17 cases (19.3%). Among 35 patients with nodal metastases, recurrence developed in 15 (42.9%) patients and all except one died within five to 50 months. The remaining patients had a median disease-free period of 55 months (13-93 months). The recurrence rate was higher (63.6%) among patients with upper aortic lymph node metastases, and all those who recurred died of disease within seven to 28 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that aortic lymphadenectomy provides both diagnostic and therapeutic value in the management of endometrial carcinoma with high metastatic risk. After surgical removal and adjuvant radiotherapy, patients with nodal metastases achieved a better survival chance.     

盆腔淋巴清扫术对子宫内膜癌预后的影响

目的　探讨子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴转移的相关因素及盆腔淋巴清扫术对子宫内膜癌预后的影响。方法　选择 1981年 1月至 2 0 0 2年 12月行子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴清扫术患者 90例 ,淋巴结取样活检术患者 12例 ,分析这 10 2例患者淋巴转移与各临床病理指标的关系。随机选取同期未行淋巴清扫术的 90例患者作为对照与行淋巴清扫术的 90例患者进行比较 ,寿命表法计算两者的生存率。结果　 10 2例患者中 ,低分化、深肌层浸润、宫颈浸润、腹腔冲洗液细胞学检查阳性、附件浸润、远处转移者 ,盆腔淋巴转移的发生率升高 ,分别为 46%、42 %、44%、52 %、75%、10 0 %。盆腔淋巴转移患者的 5年累计生存率 (3 7% )低于无淋巴转移者 (89% ,P <0 0 1)。 90例行盆腔淋巴清扫术患者与对照者的 5年累计生存率分别为 78%和 72 % ,两者比较 ,差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5)。COX逐步回归分析显示 ,盆腔淋巴清扫术不是影响患者预后的独立因素。结论　低分化、深肌层浸润、宫颈浸润、腹腔冲洗液细胞学检查阳性、附件浸润、远处转移是子宫内膜癌盆腔淋巴转移的高危因素 ,有盆腔淋巴转移的患者预后差 ,但盆腔淋巴清扫术并不改善患者预后     

Pelvic and aortic lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The appropriate management of advanced ovarian cancer has been controversial in recent years. There are no adequate data about the importance of lymphadenectomy and the appropriate sites for lymph node assessment. We sought to evaluate the distribution, size, and number of pelvic and aortic lymph node metastases in patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 116 patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma treated at Mayo Clinic who underwent systematic bilateral pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy between 1996 and 2000. RESULTS: Eighty-six (78%) of 110 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy were found to have nodal metastases in 422 (16%) of 2705 pelvic nodes that were removed. Eighty-four (84%) of 100 patients had documented aortic lymph node metastases in 456 (35%) of 1313 aortic nodes that were removed. Fifty-five (59%) of 94 patients had bilateral metastatic pelvic and aortic lymph nodes and bilateral aortic lymphadenectomy was conducted in 53 (72%) of 74 patients. The most representative group for detection of nodal metastases was the aortic group (83%) followed by the external iliac group (59%) and the obturator nodes (53%). There was no significant difference between the mean size of positive (1.8 cm) and negative nodes (1.6 cm). Thirty-seven patients had unilateral tumor, and 1 patient (7%) had contralateral node metastasis. CONCLUSION: The incidence of positive nodes bilaterally and positive high aortic nodes indicates the need for bilateral pelvic and aortic node dissection (extending above the inferior mesenteric artery) in all patients regardless of laterality of the primary tumor.     

基于云技术和人工智能的自动化细胞学诊断平台在703 103名女性宫颈癌筛查中的应用研究#br# #br#

目的探讨低危子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移情况、相关因素及预后。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年9月在郑州大学第一附属医院行分期手术的452例低危子宫内膜癌患者的临床资料,采用单因素分析淋巴结转移的危险因素。结果 452例低危子宫内膜癌患者盆腔和(或)腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移率2.65%(12/452),复发率0.66%(3/452),死亡率0.44%(2/452)。单因素分析显示,浸润表浅肌层、组织学分级G2、低体质指数与淋巴结转移的关联有统计学意义(P 0.05)。年龄、CA125水平、淋巴脉管间隙浸润、肿瘤大小、腹水细胞学阳性等与淋巴结转移的关联无统计学意义(P0.05)。269例浅肌层浸润患者G1组与G2组淋巴结转移率[1.00%(1/100)、6.51%(11/169)]比较,差异有统计学意义(P 0.05)。结论病变局限于子宫内膜的低危子宫内膜癌患者,无论肿瘤大小及分级,淋巴结转移率低,复发率低,预后好,可不行腹膜后淋巴结切除术;低体质指数、浅肌层浸润且组织学G2的患者淋巴结转移率较高,建议评估淋巴结转移情况。     

Number of Removed Pelvic Lymph Nodes as a Prognostic Marker in FIGO Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes

Study ObjectiveTo investigate whether the number of removed lymph nodes (RLNs) influences the clinical outcome of stage IB1 cervical cancer on the premise of uniform pelvic lymphadenectomy.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingObstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University.PatientsWomen (n = 782) with stage IB1 cervical cancer.InterventionsLaparoscopic radical hysterectomy and uniform pelvic lymphadenectomy (common iliac, external iliac, internal iliac, obturator) for stage IB1 cervical cancer. The median time of follow-up was 64.7 months (range, 4.3–102.8).Measurements and Main ResultsOf 782 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer, the median number of pelvic RLNs was 19 (range, 7–49). Twenty-one patients (2.7%) had RLNs ≤ 10, 461 (59.0%) had 11 to 20, 263 (33.6%) had 21 to 30, and 37 (4.7%) had RLNs ≥ 31. The differences were not statistically significant in the clinicopathologic characteristics between the 4 groups (p >.05). In the multivariate analysis, pelvic RLN number became an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage IB1 cervical cancer (p = .029; .015 for CSS and PFS). After the stratified analysis by lymph node metastasis, RLN number remained an independent predictive value (p = .026 for CSS, p = .012 for PFS) in patients with negative pelvic lymph nodes. Moreover, patients with RLN number ≤ 10 carried a 5.550-fold higher risk for progression (p <.001) and 5.596-fold greater likelihood of death (p = .001) than those with RLN number > 10 in case of no lymph node metastasis.ConclusionWith uniform pelvic lymphadenectomy, the total pelvic RLN number could be a valuable predictor of outcome in stage IB1 cervical cancer without lymph node metastasis during a follow-up of at least 5 years.     

Lymph node metastasis of ovarian cancer: a preliminary survey of 74 cases of lymphadenectomy

Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed in 74 cases of various types of ovarian malignancies. Fifty-three (71.6%) were histologically confirmed as cancer of epithelial origin and 19 (25.7%) as germ cell tumors. The results indicate that lymphatic metastasis is an exceedingly important route of spreading of this group of malignant diseases. The overall incidence of retroperitoneal positive nodes was 56.8% (42/74). In 49 cases undergoing systemic lymphadenectomy 32 were found to have glandular involvement, of which both aortic and pelvic nodes were positive in 17 cases (53.1%), aortic nodes positive but pelvic negative in six (18.8%), and pelvic nodes positive but aortic negative in nine (28.1%). In 32 cases with primary cancer that originated from the left ovary, 17 (53.1%) were found to have positive pelvic nodes, whereas in 19 cases with cancer arising from the right ovary, only one (5.3%) had metastasis of ipsilateral pelvic nodes. The routes of lymphatic spreading and the significance of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer are discussed.     

The incidence of isolated para-aortic nodal metastasis in completely staged endometrial cancer patients

Objective

To describe and review the incidence of para-aortic (PA) nodal metastasis in completely staged endometrial cancer patients who are negative for pelvic nodal metastasis.

Methods

Using an institutionally maintained database, we identified all patients with endometrial cancer from 2002 to 2006 who had both pelvic and aortic nodal dissections and determined the rate of isolated para-aortic nodal metastasis in non-malignant (i.e. negative) pelvic nodes.

Results

201 endometrial cancer patients were surgically treated at our institution from 2002 to 2006. 171 patients had both pelvic and PA nodes removed during surgery, and specimens examined by a pathologist. Only 2 (1.2%) had PA nodes that tested positive for malignance (i.e. positive PA nodes) with pelvic nodes that tested negative for malignance (i.e. negative pelvic nodes). The final International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grade for the endometrial tumor cells in the two patients was “G1” with endometrioid adenocarcinoma and “G3” with endometrioid adenocarcinoma and mucinous differentiation, respectively.

Conclusion

Based on the very low incidence of patients inflicted with endometrial cancer that have positive para-aortic lymph nodes (PALNs) with negative pelvic nodes found both in our literature review (1.5%) and in our own study (1.2%), the addition of PA lymphadenectomy in all patients was found to have minimal diagnostic and therapeutic value. At the present, the role of complete PA lymphadenectomy in all patients with endometrial cancer should be re-examined. Individualized algorithms should be developed based on risk factors and status of pelvic nodes.     

Sentinel lymphatic mapping among women with early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review

The presence of pelvic lymph node metastases is without doubt the most significant prognostic factor that determines recurrences and survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer. To avoid the underdiagnosis of lymph node metastasis, pelvic lymphadenectomy procedure is routinely performed with radical hysterectomy procedure. However, the pelvic lymphadenectomy procedure may not be necessary in most of these women due to the relatively low incidence of pelvic lymph node metastasis. The removal of large numbers of pelvic lymph nodes could also render non-metastatic irreversible damages for these women, including vessel, nerve, or ureteral injuries; formation of lymphocysts; and lymphedema. Over the past decades, the concept of sentinel lymph node biopsy has emerged as a popular and widespread surgical technique for the evaluation of the pelvic lymph node status in gynecologic malignancies. The histological status of sentinel lymph node should be representative for all other lymph nodes in the regional drainage area. If metastasis is non-existent in the sentinel lymph node, the likelihood of metastatic spread in the remaining regional lymph nodes is very low. Further lymphadenectomy is therefore not necessary for a patient with negative sentinel lymph nodes. Since the uterine cervix has several lymphatic drainage pathways, it is a challenging task to assess the distribution pattern of sentinel lymph nodes in women with early-stage cervical cancer. This review article will adapt the methodology proposed in these studies to systematically review sentinel lymphatic mapping among women with early-stage cervical cancer.     

Retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis in patients with ovarian cancer

From 1979 to 1987 retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was performed at the Tokyo University Hospital in 41 cases (pelvic lymph node biopsy was done in 4 cases, pelvic lymphadenectomy in 23 cases, pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels in 14 cases) of Stage Ia to IV ovarian cancer following cytoreductive surgery. The incidence of retroperitoneal positive nodes was 11.1% (2/18) in Stage I, 50.0% (5/10) in Stage II, 50.0% (5/10) in Stage III and 0% (0/3) in Stage IV (FIGO criteria without considering the pathologic findings of retroperitoneal lymph nodes). The positive rate of lymph node involvement in Stage II and Stage III was significantly higher than that in Stage I. The tumors involving both ovaries were more likely to metastasize to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Enlargement of tumors and increased ascites were not the risk factors of retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. These data suggest that the occurrence of retroperitoneal lymphatic spread in ovarian cancer is comparable to that in uterine cancer and increased by involvement of both ovaries and extension to other pelvic tissues.     

Role of lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer

The exact role of lymphadenectomy in the management of ovarian cancer has been the object of controversy during recent years. The International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology has indicated that pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling is an integral part of the staging system of ovarian cancer. On the other hand the advantage of systematic sampling, resection of bulky nodes only, or no lymphadenectomy in terms of recurrence rate and survival of ovarian cancer patients has not yet been clearly defined. Thanks to the analysis of clinical studies on systematic lymphadenectomy, detailed anatomical studies to assess the location of lymph nodes and lymphatic spread have been recently reported.In this chapter we report the available data on clinical anatomy and pathological assessment of lymph node and lymphatic spread of ovarian cancer metastasis; we also review the clinical data on correlation of lymph node metastasis and disease status. Surgical techniques developed during years of dedication to this procedure are also described. Finally, we review and discuss the actual benefits of lymph node dissection in patients with ovarian cancer, analysing previously reported and ongoing trials.