Durability of peel bond of resilient denture liners to acrylic denture base resin

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the durability of the peel bond of commercial resilient denture liners to a denture base resin using a thermal cycling test.MethodsEight commercial resilient denture liners (five silicone and three acrylic) were used in the study. The samples were exposed to thermal cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C for 1 min for 0, 1,250, 2,500, 5,000 and 10,000 cycles. The test samples were placed under tension until failure in a materials testing machine using a crosshead speed of 20 mm/min. The modes of debonding were characterized as tear, peel or snap. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way and two-way analysis of variance and Student–Newman–Keuls multiple comparison tests (α = .05).ResultsA significant difference was found between different resilient denture liners for peel bond strength at 0 cycles. No extreme influence on the peel bond strength was observed under any of the thermal cycles. The snap mode of debonding was observed in most samples of all materials for all cycles.ConclusionAll resilient denture liners tested had a sufficiently strong bond to the denture base resin. Within the limitations of this study, the results show that all of the materials were acceptable for clinical use, having met the accepted adequate bond strength for resilient denture liners of 0.45 MPa.     

Shear bond strength between light polymerized hard reline resin and denture base resin subjected to long term water immersion

Statement of the problemThe effect of long-term water immersion on the shear bond strength between denture base resin and Triad visible-light-polymerized (VLP) direct hard reline resin is not known.PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the bonding characteristics of Triad VLP direct hard reline resin to heat-polymerized denture base resin subjected to long-term water immersion.Material and methodsNinety circular disks, 15 mm in diameter and 3 mm thick, of denture base resin were polymerized from a gypsum mold. Sixty specimens were subjected to water immersion and 30 were stored at ambient room temperature for 4 months. Thirty water-immersed specimens were dried with gauze (group 1), while the other 30 water-immersed specimens were dried with a hair dryer (group 2). The dry specimens (n = 30) represented the control group (group 3). All specimens were air abraded and painted with bonding agent before packing Triad VLP direct hard-reline resin. Specimens in each group were subjected to thermal cycling for 50,000 cycles between 4 °C and 60 °C water baths with 1-min dwell time at each temperature. The bond strength at which the bond failed under stress was recorded using a universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc comparison were applied to find significant differences between groups (α = 0.05).ResultsSignificant differences in mean shear bond strength among the specimens existed because of variable water content in the denture base resin (P < 0.05). Group 3 (dry) was higher than group 2 (desiccated), and the lowest was group 1 (saturated).ConclusionThe shear bond strength of Triad VLP direct hard reline resin to denture base resin depended on the water content in the denture base resin. The dry denture base resin demonstrated superior bond strength compared with the desiccated and water-saturated denture base resins.     

Adhesion properties in systems of laminated pigmented polymers,carbon–graphite fiber composite framework and titanium surfaces in implant suprastructures

ObjectiveFor long-term stability the adhering interfaces of an implant-retained supraconstruction of titanium/carbon–graphite fiber-reinforced (CGFR) polymer/opaquer layer/denture base polymer/denture teeth must function as a unity. The aim was to evaluate adhesion of CGFR polymer to a titanium surface or CGFR polymer to two different opaquer layers/with two denture base polymers.Materials and methodsTitanium plates were surface-treated and silanized and combined with a bolt of CGFR polymer or denture base polymer (Probase Hot). Heat-polymerized plates of CGFR polymer (47 wt% fiber) based on poly(methyl methacrylate) and a copolymer matrix were treated with an opaquer (Sinfony or Ropak) before a denture base polymer bolt was attached (Probase Hot or Lucitone 199). All specimens were heat-polymerized, water saturated (200 days) and thermally cycled (5000 cycles, 5/55 °C) before shear bond testing.ResultsSilicatized titanium surfaces gave higher bond strength to CGFR polymer (16.2 ± 2.34 and 18.6 ± 1.32) MPa and cohesive fracture than a sandblasted surface (5.9 ± 2.11) MPa where the fracture was adhesive. The opaquer Sinfony gave higher adhesion values and mainly cohesive fractures than the opaquer Ropak. Different surface treatments (roughened or polished) of the CGFR polymer had no effect on bond strength.SignificanceThe fracture surfaces of silicatized titanium/CGFR polymer/opaquer layer (Sinfony)/denture base polymers were mainly cohesive. A combination of these materials in an implant-retained supraconstruction is promising for in vivo evaluation.     

Evaluation of adhesion of chairside hard relining materials to denture base polymers

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Removable denture bases are made of modified poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), which has reliable bond strength with resins containing methyl methacrylate (MMA). However, some hard relining materials with different chemical compositions have been reported to have less than adequate bond strength to PMMA denture base polymers. PURPOSE: This in vitro study evaluated the initial bonding properties of chairside hard relining materials to different removable denture base polymers, as well as the structure of the interface. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The tensile strength (MPa) of adhesion of 8 chairside hard relining materials (Original Truliner, GC Reline Hard, Ufigel Hard, Triad Reline, New Truliner, Light Liner, Astron LC Hard, and Flexacryl Hard) was tested against 3 denture base polymers (Ivocap Plus, Paladon 65, and Palapress Vario). Dumbbell-shaped specimens with a 6-mm diameter of bonding surface were used for tensile testing of bond strength (n=5). An MMA containing hard relining material (Original Truliner) was used as a control. Tensile strength of the bond was calculated using the bonding area and maximum force under tension. Statistical analyses of data were conducted with 2-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). The influence of the bonding agents and the relining materials on the PMMA denture base surface layer and its structure were investigated. The depths of the swollen layers were measured with a transmission light microscope. Fracture surfaces after testing were also visually evaluated. Chemical analyses of all materials prior to testing were performed using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Significant differences were found among tensile bond strengths of chairside hard relining materials to PMMA denture base polymers forming 3 different groups (P<.001). No significant difference among different denture base polymers was found with regard to tensile strength of adhesion (P=.918), but the interaction term between hard relining material and denture base polymer was found to be significant (P<.001). The tensile bond strength of the relining materials and denture base polymers was found to range from 8% to 60% of the strength of the PMMA denture base polymers. CONCLUSION: The chemical composition of the bonding agents and the relining materials and their combinations affected the depth of the swollen layers of the denture base polymers and the tensile strength of adhesion.     

Comparison of shear bond strengths of different types of denture teeth to different denture base resins

PURPOSETo determine the shear bond strengths of different denture base resins to different types of prefabricated teeth (acrylic, nanohybrid composite, and cross-linked) and denture teeth produced by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology.MATERIALS AND METHODSPrefabricated teeth and CAD/CAM (milled) denture teeth were divided into 10 groups and bonded to different denture base materials. Groups 1–3 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and cold-polymerized denture base resin; groups 4–6 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and heat-polymerized denture base resin; groups 7–9 comprised of different types of prefabricated teeth and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resin; and group 10 comprised of milled denture teeth produced by CAD/CAM technology and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resin. A universal testing machine was used to evaluate the shear bond strength for all specimens. One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test were used for analyzing the data (α=.05).RESULTSThe shear bond strengths of different groups ranged from 3.37 ± 2.14 MPa to 18.10 ± 2.68 MPa. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among the tested groups (P<.0001). Among different polymerization methods, the lowest values were determined in cold-polymerized resin.There was no significant difference between the shear bond strength values of heat-polymerized and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base resins.CONCLUSIONDifferent combinations of materials for removable denture base and denture teeth can affect their bond strength. Cold-polymerized resin should be avoided for attaching prefabricated teeth to a denture base. CAD/CAM (milled) and heat-polymerized denture base resins bonded to different types of prefabricated teeth show similar shear bond strength values.     

Scratch test of thermoplastic denture base resins for non-metal clasp dentures

PurposeSeveral thermoplastic denture base resins have been introduced for the fabrication of non-metal clasp dentures. Although the surface of these materials is easily damaged, the surface roughness and characteristics of scratches created have not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of thermoplastic resins using a scratch test for the development of future materials.MethodsFour thermoplastic (polyamide: Valplast^®; VLP and Lucitone FRS^®; FRS, polyethylene terephthalate: EstheShot^®; ES, and polyester: EstheShot Bright^®; ESB) and two conventional acrylic (Heat-polymerizing: Urban^®; HC, and Pour type auto-polymerizing: Pro-Cast DSP^®; PR) denture base resins were examined. Eight specimens, approximately 10 mm × 10 mm × 30 mm in size, of each material were fabricated. Scratch test was performed by a scratch tester with a diamond indenter of 10-μm radius and cone angle 90°, applying a constant load of 500 mN, and 2-mm-long scratches were made. The scratch marks were studied under 3D laser measuring microscope and cross-section profiles at approximately 0.5 mm, 1.0 mm, and 1.5 mm from the starting point were extracted and measured with analysis software. Data from 24 cross-section profiles in each denture base material were analyzed.ResultsThe maximum depths of ES, ESB and FRS were greater than VLP, PR and HC, and the scratch widths of ES, ESB, FRS and VPL were greater than PR and HC.ConclusionsThe results showed that the surface of thermoplastic denture base resins was easily damaged compared to polymethyl methacrylate.     

Effect of proanthocyanidin incorporation into dental adhesive resin on resin-dentine bond strength

ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effect of proanthocyanidin (PA) incorporation into experimental dental adhesives on resin–dentine bond strength.MethodsFour experimental hydrophilic adhesives containing different PA concentrations were prepared by combining 50 wt% resin comonomer mixtures with 50 wt% ethanol. Proanthocyanidin was added to the ethanol-solvated resin to yield three adhesives with PA concentrations of 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 wt%, respectively. A PA-free adhesive served as the control. Flat dentine surfaces from 40 extracted third molars were etched with 32% phosphoric acid. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of the four adhesive groups. Two layers of one of the four experimental adhesives were applied to the etched dentine and light-cured for 20 s. Composite build-ups were performed using Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE). After storage in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, twenty-four bonded teeth were sectioned into 0.9 mm × 0.9 mm beams and stressed to failure under tension for bond strength testing. Bond strength data were evaluated by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Interfacial nanoleakage was examined in the remaining teeth using a field-emission scanning electron microscope and analysed using the Chi-square test (α = 0.05).ResultsNo significant difference in bond strength was found amongst PA-free, 1% and 2% PA adhesives. However, incorporation of 3% PA into the adhesive significantly lowered bond strength as demonstrated by a greater number of adhesive failures and more extensive nanoleakage along the bonded interface.ConclusionIncorporation of 2% proanthocyanidin into dental adhesives has no adverse effect on dentine bond strength.Clinical significanceThe addition of proanthocyanidin to an experimental adhesive has no adverse effect on the immediate resin–dentine bond strength when the concentration of proanthocyanidin in the adhesive is less than or equal to 2%.     

Shear bond strengths for composite and autopolymerized acrylic resins bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth

Statement of problem. Composite has been used to modify acrylic resin denture teeth. Purpose. This in vitro investigation examined the shear bond strengths between composite and autopolymerized acrylic resin bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. Material and methods. The surface treatments used for the denture teeth included wetting with methyl methacrylate (MMA), vinylethyl methacrylate monomer (VEMA), unfilled liquid resin, composite bonding agent, and composite color modifier. Nonhydrated and hydrated denture tooth groups were included. A commercial composite was bonded to the denture teeth. The control group consisted of autopolymerized PMMA resin bonded to the acrylic resin denture teeth, and another group consisted of polyvinylethyl methacrylate bonded to acrylic resin denture teeth. The samples were thermocycled and tested in shear. Results. Acrylic resin denture teeth prewetted with MMA and treated with unfilled resin or a bonding agent had bond strength values comparable to the control group. VEMA was not as effective in promoting the bond. Composite color modifier did not produce a significantly weaker bond between the acrylic resin teeth and added composite. No prewetting of the teeth with MMA resulted in the lowest bond strength. Mean shear bond strengths for corresponding hydrated and non-hydrated groups were not significantly different. Conclusion. Bond strength of composite-to-acrylic resin denture teeth was comparable to the bond strength of autopolymerized acrylic resin.     

Pressure transmission area and maximum pressure transmission of different thermoplastic resin denture base materials under impact load

Purposes

The purposes of the present study were to examine the pressure transmission area and maximum pressure transmission of thermoplastic resin denture base materials under an impact load, and to evaluate the modulus of elasticity and nanohardness of thermoplastic resin denture base.

Bond strength of denture teeth to denture base resins

PURPOSE: The study examined the bond strength between 2 types of denture teeth and 3 denture base resins. The denture teeth were untreated, prepared with diatorics, or treated with dichloromethane, a solvent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Conventional denture teeth and cross-linked denture teeth were bonded to either a heat-cured denture base resin, a microwave-cured denture base resin, or a pour-type denture base resin. Compressive load was applied at 45 degrees on the palatal surface of each tooth until fracture. RESULTS: Conventional resin teeth possessed higher bond strength than cross-linked denture teeth. The heat-cured denture base resin significantly surpassed the microwave-cured denture base resin in bond strength. Both materials were better than the pour-type resin. The application of dichloromethane resulted in a significantly better improvement in bond strength compared to the use of diatorics. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that dichloromethane be applied on the denture teeth ridge-lap area prior to denture base processing.     

Effect of storage in artificial saliva and thermal cycling on Knoop hardness of resin denture teeth

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of different storage periods in artificial saliva and thermal cycling on Knoop hardness of 8 commercial brands of resin denture teeth.MethodsEigth different brands of resin denture teeth were evaluated (Artplus group, Biolux group, Biotone IPN group, Myerson group, SR Orthosit group, Trilux group, Trubyte Biotone group, and Vipi Dent Plus group). Twenty-four teeth of each brand had their occlusal surfaces ground flat and were embedded in autopolymerized acrylic resin. After polishing, the teeth were submitted to different conditions: (1) immersion in distilled water at 37 ± 2 °C for 48 ± 2 h (control); (2) storage in artificial saliva at 37 ± 2 °C for 15, 30 and 60 days, and (3) thermal cycling between 5 and 55 °C with 30-s dwell times for 5000 cycles. Knoop hardness test was performed after each condition. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = .05).ResultsIn general, SR Orthosit group presented the highest statistically significant Knoop hardness value while Myerson group exhibited the smallest statistically significant mean (P < .05) in the control period, after thermal cycling, and after all storage periods. The Knoop hardness means obtained before thermal cycling procedure (20.34 ± 4.45 KHN) were statistically higher than those reached after thermal cycling (19.77 ± 4.13 KHN). All brands of resin denture teeth were significantly softened after storage period in artificial saliva.ConclusionStorage in saliva and thermal cycling significantly reduced the Knoop hardness of the resin denture teeth. SR Orthosit denture teeth showed the highest Knoop hardness values regardless the condition tested.     

丙酮及甲基丙烯酸甲酯表面处理对基托树脂与软衬材料粘接效果的影响

目的 研究丙酮及甲基丙烯酸甲酯表面处理对基托树脂与软衬材料间微渗漏、粘接强度及基托树脂抗弯强度的影响.方法 制备30 mm×30 mm×2 mm树脂块36块,根据随机数字表随机均分为3组,每组12块,丙酮组:树脂块粘接面浸泡于丙酮溶液中30 s;甲基丙烯酸甲酯组:树脂块粘接面浸泡于甲基丙烯酸甲酯溶液中180 s;对照组:不进行表面处理.两树脂块间衬以2 mm软衬材料后粘接,冷热循环5000次,浸泡于131Ⅰ溶液中24h后计数γ射线,即微渗漏数.制备36块30 mm×10 mm ×7.5 mm树脂块,分组及表面处理同上.两树脂块间衬以3 mm软衬材料后粘接,冷热循环5000次后,测试拉伸强度,即粘接强度.制备18块65 mm× 10 mm×3.3 mm树脂块,分组及表面处理同上,涂布软衬材料粘接剂后测试抗弯强度.结果 丙酮组和甲基丙烯酸甲酯组的微渗漏数(520.0±562.2和493.5±447.9)均小于对照组(1369.5±590.2,P＜0.05);丙酮组和甲基丙烯酸甲酯组粘接强度[(1.5±0.4)和(1.4±0.5) MPa]均大于对照组[(0.9±0.2) MPa,P＜0.05];两实验组间微渗漏数和粘接强度差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05);3组抗弯强度差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 丙酮及甲基丙烯酸甲酯表面处理可减少软衬材料与基托树脂间微渗漏,增加两者间粘接强度,未导致基托树脂抗弯强度下降.     

High-impact strength acrylic denture base material processed by autoclave

PurposeTo investigate the effect of two different cycles of autoclave processing on the transverse strength, impact strength, surface hardness and the porosity of high-impact strength acrylic denture base material.MethodsHigh Impact Acryl was the heat-cured acrylic denture base material included in the study. A total of 120 specimens were prepared, the specimens were grouped into: control groups in which high-impact strength acrylic resins processed by conventional water-bath processing technique (74 °C for 1.5 h then boil for 30 min) and experimental groups in which high-impact strength acrylic resins processed by autoclave at 121 °C, 210 kPa .The experimental groups were divided into (fast) groups for 15 min, and (slow) groups for 30 min. To study the effect of the autoclave processing (Tuttnauer 2540EA), four tests were conducted transverse strength (Instron universal testing machine), impact strength (Charpy tester), surface hardness (shore D), and porosity test. The results were analyzed to ANOVA and LSD test.ResultsIn ANOVA test, there were highly significant differences between the results of the processing techniques in transverse, impact, hardness, and porosity test. The LSD test showed a significant difference between control and fast groups in transverse and hardness tests and a non-significant difference in impact test and a highly significant difference in porosity test; while, there were a highly significant differences between control and slow groups in all examined tests; finally, there were a non-significant difference between fast and slow groups in transverse and porosity tests and a highly significant difference in impact and hardness tests.ConclusionsIn the autoclave processing technique, the slow (long) curing cycle improved the tested physical and mechanical properties as compared with the fast (short) curing cycle. The autoclave processing technique improved the tested physical and mechanical properties of High Impact Acryl.     

Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Denture Base Resins to Acrylic Resin Teeth: Effect of Thermocycling

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the thermocycling effects and shear bond strength of acrylic resin teeth to denture base resins.
Materials and Methods: Three acrylic teeth (Biotone, Trilux, Ivoclar) were chosen for bonding to four denture base resins: microwave-polymerized (Acron MC), heat-polymerized (Lucitone 550 and QC-20), and light-polymerized (Versyo.bond). Twenty specimens were produced for each denture base/acrylic tooth combination and were divided into two groups (n = 10): without thermocycling (control groups) and thermocycled groups submitted to 5000 cycles between 4 and 60°C. Shear strength tests (MPa) were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis of the results was carried out with three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparisons post hoc analysis for test groups (α= 0.05).
Results: The shear bond strengths of Lucitone/Biotone, Lucitone/Trilux, and Versyo/Ivoclar specimens were significantly decreased by thermocycling, compared with the corresponding control groups ( p < 0.05). The means of Acron/Ivoclar and Lucitone/Ivoclar specimens increased after thermocycling ( p < 0.05). The highest mean shear bond strength value was observed with Lucitone/Biotone in the control group (14.54 MPa) and the lowest with QC-20/Trilux in the thermocycled group (3.69 MPa).
Conclusion: Some acrylic tooth/denture base resin combinations can be more affected by thermocycling; effects vary based upon the materials used.     

Effect of pre-processing surface treatments of acrylic teeth on bonding to the denture base

Summary  The aim of this study was to examine the bond strength between acrylic teeth after various surface treatments and processing with either a heat- or microwave-polymerized denture base material. Specimens were prepared and tested according to the methods described in American National Standard/American Dental Association Specification No.15 (Synthetic Polymer Teeth) using a special assembly. Three brands of acrylic teeth were used with the following treatments: control (no treatment), grinding and grinding plus sandblasting. Treatment groups were further divided into two denture base processing subgroups: heat-polymerized and microwave-polymerized methods. Denture base processing to the acrylic teeth was performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine with five specimens and each specimen is composed of six anterior teeth per experimental group. Data were analysed using a three-way anova and the Scheffe' F -test post hoc pair wise comparison at the 95% significance level. The mean bond strength values ranged from 33.1 ± 4.1 to 51.6 ± 2.5 MPa. The bond strength values of sandblasted surfaces were significantly higher than those of the ground surface and the control ( P  < 0.05). Combined (acrylic tooth and denture base resin) cohesive failures were disclosed in all tested samples. Acrylic tooth surface pre-processed surface treatment with grinding plus sandblasting and processed with a heat-polymerized denture base provided the greatest bond strength between acrylic tooth and denture base.     

Effect of implant support on mandibular distal extension removable partial dentures: Relationship between denture supporting area and stress distribution

PurposeThis study explored the relationship between implant support and the denture-supporting area by comparing the stability of an implant-supported distal extension removable partial denture and a conventional distal extension removable partial denture.MethodsA model simulating a mandibular bilateral distal extension missing (#34–37 and #44–47) was fabricated using silicone impression material as soft tissue (2 mm thick) on an epoxy resin bone model. The denture base was reduced by 5 mm cutting part of both the retromolar pad and the lingual border. Loads of up to 5 kg were applied, and the pressure and displacement of the RPDs were simultaneously measured and analyzed using the Wilcoxon test (α < 0.05).ResultsThe pressure on the bilateral first molar and the middle areas of the implant-supported distal extension removable partial denture (ISRPD) was significantly less than on the conventional RPD (CRPD). As the supporting area of the denture base decreased, the pressure and the denture displacement of the CRPD were greater than for the ISRPD.ConclusionThis study indicated that implant placement at the distal edentulous ridge can prevent denture displacement of the distal extension bases, regardless of the supporting area of the denture base.     

Denture flask fabrication using fused deposition modeling three-dimensional printing

PurposeThis paper describes a method for making a customized denture flask using fused deposition modeling (FDM) by three-dimensional (3D) printing. We have proposed a new digital dental prosthesis using conventional dental base materials and artificial teeth.MethodsUsing the universal development system software, a denture-designed Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file and a denture flask STL file were superimposed, and the denture region was set as an empty space. After setting the offset value to 200 μm between the denture base and teeth for artificial tooth positioning, the flask was created by FDM 3D printing. Conventional artificial teeth were inserted into the 3D-printed flask, and resin packing, finishing, and polishing were performed using the conventional method for fabricating the complete denture.ConclusionsThe 3D printing materials used to make digital dental prostheses have not yet been fully validated. Therefore, the production of a 3D-printed denture flask, which can use conventional complete denture materials, presents a new alternative to the digital fabrication of dentures.     

Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Hypoallergenic denture base materials show no residual methyl methacrylate (MMA) or significantly lower residual MMA monomer content compared to polymethyl methacrylate-based (PMMA) heat-polymerizing acrylic resin. There is insufficient knowledge of the mechanical properties of hypoallergenic denture base materials to warrant their use in place of PMMA-based acrylic resins for patients with allergic reaction to MMA. PURPOSE: This in vitro study compared flexural strength and flexural modulus of 4 hypoallergenic denture base materials with flexural strength/modulus of a PMMA heat-polymerizing acrylic resin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The following denture base resins were examined: Sinomer (heat-polymerized, modified methacrylate), Polyan (thermoplastic, modified methacrylate), Promysan (thermoplastic, enterephthalate-based), Microbase (microwave-polymerized, polyurethane-based), and Paladon 65 (heat-polymerized, methacrylate, control group). Specimens of each material were tested for flexural strength and flexural modulus (MPa, n = 5) according to ISO 1567:1999. The data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni-Dunn multiple comparisons post hoc analysis for each test variable (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Flexural strength of Microbase (67.2 +/- 5.3 MPa) was significantly lower than Paladon 65 (78.6 +/- 5.5 MPa, P <.0001). Flexural strength of Polyan (79.7 +/- 4.2 MPa, P =.599), Promysan (83.5 +/- 3.8 MPa, P =.412), and Sinomer (72.3 +/- 2.1 MPa, P =.015) did not differ significantly from the control group. Significantly lower flexural modulus was obtained from Sinomer (1720 +/- 30 MPa, P =.0007) compared to the PMMA control group (2050 +/- 40 MPa), whereas the flexural modulus of Promysan (2350 +/- 170 MPa, P =.0005) was significantly higher than the PMMA material. Microbase (2100 +/- 210 MPa, P =.373) and Polyan (2070 +/- 60 MPa, P =.577) exhibited flexural modulus similar to the PMMA material. The tested denture base materials fulfilled the requirements regarding flexural strength (>65 MPa). With the exception of Sinomer, the tested denture base resins passed the requirements of ISO 1567 regarding flexural modulus (>2000 MPa). CONCLUSION: Flexural modulus of Promysan was significantly higher than the PMMA material. Microbase and Sinomer exhibited significantly lower flexural strength and flexural modulus, respectively, than PMMA. The other groups did not differ significantly from the control group.     

Contact wear of artificial denture teeth

Purpose

High wear resistance of denture teeth preserves good occlusal relationship and sufficient parafunctional stability. This in-vitro investigation aimed to determine and compare the wear performance of different artificial denture teeth.

Properties of injection-molded thermoplastic polyester denture base resins

Objective. This study investigated the properties of injection-molded thermoplastic polyester denture base resins. Materials and methods. Two injection-molded thermoplastic polyester denture base resins (polyethylene terephthalate copolymer and polycycloalkylene terephthalate copolymer) were tested. Specimens of each denture base material were fabricated for flexural properties testing, Charpy impact testing and shear bond testing (n = 10). The flexural strength at the proportional limit, elastic modulus, Charpy impact strength and the shear bond strength of the two denture base materials were estimated. Results. The polycycloalkylene terephthalate copolymer denture base resin had significantly lower flexural strength at the proportional limit, lower elastic modulus, higher impact strength and lower shear bond strength compared to the polyethylene terephthalate copolymer denture base resin. Conclusion. The properties of the injection-molded thermoplastic denture base resins composed of polyethylene terephthalate copolymer and polycycloalkylene terephthalate copolymer were different from each other. The polycycloalkylene terephthalate copolymer denture base resin had significantly lower flexural strength at the proportional limit, lower elastic modulus, higher impact strength and lower shear bond strength compared to the polyethylene terephthalate copolymer denture base resin.