Spinal manipulation and headaches of cervical origin

The role of the cervical spine in headache remains controversial. Often confused as tension or common migraine headache, headaches arising from the neck pose a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Practitioners of spinal manipulation have reported very satisfactory results, although the only published randomized controlled trial did not demonstrate that manipulation was significantly helpful. This article reviews the published clinical studies of manipulation in the treatment of tension and migraine headaches. The topic of cervical headaches in general is reviewed and the current model of cervicogenic headache is critiqued. A representative case history is used to illustrate the thesis that the current model of cervicogenic headache may be too restrictive. The role of spinal manipulation as a trial of therapy in individual patients is also discussed. a retrospective diagnosis of cervical headache can often be confirmed by a successful outcome.     

Chiropractic care of a patient with vertebral subluxations and unsuccessful surgery of the cervical spine

OBJECTIVE: The chiropractic care of a patient with vertebral subluxations, neck pain, and cervical radiculopathy after a cervical diskectomy is described. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 55-year-old man had neck pain and left upper extremity radiculopathy after unsuccessful cervical spine surgery. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Contact-specific, high-velocity, low-amplitude adjustments (i.e., Gonstead technique) were applied to sites of vertebral subluxations. Rehabilitation exercises were also used as adjunct to care. The patient reported a decrease in neck pain and left arm pain after chiropractic intervention. The patient also demonstrated a marked increase in range of motion (ROM) of the left glenohumeral articulation. CONCLUSION: The chiropractic care of a patient with neck pain and left upper extremity radiculopathy after cervical diskectomy is presented. Marked resolution of the patient's symptoms was obtained concomitant with a reduction in subluxation findings at multiple levels despite the complicating history of an unsuccessful cervical spine surgery. This is the first report in the indexed literature of chiropractic care after an unsuccessful cervical spine surgery.     

Lower cervical disc prolapse may cause cervicogenic headache: prospective study in patients undergoing surgery

In 1983 Sjaastad published for the first time diagnostic criteria for cervicogenic headache. Until now there have been no prospective studies investigating whether cervical disc prolapse can cause cervicogenic headache. Between July 2002 and July 2003 50 patients with cervical disc prolapse proven by computed tomography, myelography or magnetic resonance imaging were recruited and prospectively followed for 3 months. Patients were asked at different time points about headache and neck pain by questionnaires and structured interviews. These data were collected prior to and 7 and 90 days after surgery for the disc prolapse. Fifty patients with lumbar disc prolapse, matched for age and sex, undergoing surgery were recruited as controls. Headache and neck pain was diagnosed according to International Headache Society (IHS) criteria. Twelve of 50 patients with cervical disc prolapse reported new headache and neck pain. Seven patients (58%) fulfilled the 2004 IHS criteria for cervicogenic headache. Two of 50 patients with lumbar disc prolapse had new headaches. Their headaches did not fulfil the criteria for cervicogenic headache. One week after surgery, 8/12 patients with cervical disc prolapse and headache reported to be pain free. One patient was improved and three were unchanged. Three months after cervical prolapse surgery, seven patients were pain free, three improved and two unchanged. This prospective study shows an association of low cervical prolapse with cervicogenic headache: headache and neck pain improves or disappears in 80% of patients after surgery for the cervical disc prolapse. These results indicate that pain afferents from the lower cervical roots can converge on the cervical trigeminal nucleus and the nucleus caudalis.     

Role of Manual Physical Therapy and Specific Exercise Intervention in the Treatment of a Patient with Cervicogenic Headaches: A Case Report

Abstract

Headaches are a common complaint among patients seeking medical care. This case report highlights the role of physical therapy (PT) management including manual therapy and specific exercise interventions in the care of a patient with cervicogenic headaches. The patient was an 18-year-old female college student with a medical diagnosis of migraine headaches. Her history included three previous motor vehicle accidents. Treatment from her primary care physician and optometrist had had no effect on her headache intensity and frequency. Findings on the PT examination included upper cervical segmental restrictions and neuromuscular imbalances. The primary treatment strategy for this patient included cervical manipulation, neuromuscular retraining of deep neck flexors, and soft tissue manipulation. The patient demonstrated improvement with a total of seven treatment sessions over a five-week period. Neck Pain Disability Index score improved from a score of 38% perceived disability at initial examination to a score of 10% upon discharge. Headache frequency and intensity significantly improved as upper cervical segmental mobility and deep cervical flexor function improved to within normal limits. This case report demonstrates the potential role of manual physical therapy and specific exercise intervention in quickly improving function and impairments in a patient with cervicogenic headaches.     

Headache and the cervical spine: a critical review

Headache related to the cervical spine is often misdiagnosed and treated inadequately because of confusing and varying terminology. Primary headaches such as tension-type headache and migraine are incorrectly categorized as "cervicogenic" merely because of their occipital localization. Cervicogenic headache as described by Sjaastad presents as a unilateral headache of fluctuating intensity increased by movement of the head and typically radiates from occipital to frontal regions. Definition, pathophysiology, differential diagnoses and therapy of cervicogenic headache are demonstrated. Ipsilateral blockades of the C2 root and/or greater occipital nerve allow a differentiation between cervicogenic headache and primary headache syndromes such as migraine or tension-type headache. Neither pharmacological nor surgical or chiropractic procedures lead to a significant improvement or remission of cervicogenic headache. Pains of various anatomical regions possibly join into a common anatomical pathway, then present as cervicogenic headache, which should therefore be understood as a homogeneous but also unspecific pattern of reaction.     

Chiropractic treatment of postsurgical neck syndrome with mechanical force, manually assisted short-lever spinal adjustments

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of postsurgical neck pain, after multiple spinal surgeries, that was successfully treated by chiropractic intervention with instrumental adjustment of the cervical spine. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 35-year-old woman had chronic neck pain for over 5 years after two separate surgeries of the cervical spine: a diskectomy at C3/4 and a fusion at C5/6. Surgeries were performed 6 months apart in an attempt to resolve persistent neck pain and spasm of the cervical musculature. Neither surgery was effective in relieving the patient's pain. Five years after the second surgery, a third surgery was recommended by the patient's physicians to alleviate the chronic pain. The patient sought chiropractic evaluation of her condition to avoid further surgical intervention. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was treated with conservative instrumental chiropractic manipulation, consisting of mechanical force, manually assisted short-lever spinal adjustments rendered with an Activator Adjusting Instrument (AAI) II. She comfortably tolerated the treatment and responded favorably to this therapy. All chronic symptoms had resolved within 30 days of instituting the chiropractic instrumental adjustments with an AAI. More interestingly, longitudinal examination over the next 2 years showed that the patient experienced no residual effects or further recurrences of her previous chronic problem after her initial course of chiropractic care. CONCLUSION: Chiropractic treatment of postsurgical neck syndrome may be effectively treated, in certain cases, by mechanical force, manually assisted adjusting procedures with an AAI. The use of instrumental adjustment methodology may provide chiropractic physicians with an effective alternative to manual manipulation in those cases in which the patient's surgical history or presenting symptoms make forceful manipulation of the spine, particularly performed at end range, inappropriate. This approach may be contemplated by physicians faced with managing this type of condition. Further study should be made in this regard, in an academic research setting, to determine the safest and most effective approaches to managing postsurgical patients in a chiropractic setting.     

Manual therapy and exercise for neck pain: A systematic review

Manual therapy is often used with exercise to treat neck pain. This cervical overview group systematic review update assesses if manual therapy, including manipulation or mobilisation, combined with exercise improves pain, function/disability, quality of life, global perceived effect, and patient satisfaction for adults with neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radiculopathy. Computerized searches were performed to July 2009. Two or more authors independently selected studies, abstracted data, and assessed methodological quality. Pooled relative risk (pRR) and standardized mean differences (pSMD) were calculated. Of 17 randomized controlled trials included, 29% had a low risk of bias. Low quality evidence suggests clinically important long-term improvements in pain (pSMD-0.87(95% CI:?1.69,?0.06)), function/disability, and global perceived effect when manual therapy and exercise are compared to no treatment. High quality evidence suggests greater short-term pain relief [pSMD-0.50(95% CI:?0.76,?0.24)] than exercise alone, but no long-term differences across multiple outcomes for (sub)acute/chronic neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache. Moderate quality evidence supports this treatment combination for pain reduction and improved quality of life over manual therapy alone for chronic neck pain; and suggests greater short-term pain reduction when compared to traditional care for acute whiplash. Evidence regarding radiculopathy was sparse. Specific research recommendations are made.     

Chiropractic management using Cox cervical flexion-distraction technique for a disk herniation with left foraminal narrowing in a 64-year-old man

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this case report is to describe chiropractic management of a patient with a C6/C7 left posteromedial disk herniation with foraminal narrowing and concomitant neurological compromise in the form of left upper extremity radiating pain and hypoesthesia/anesthesia using Cox flexion-distraction technique. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 64-year-old man presented to a chiropractic clinic with complaints of neck/left shoulder pain and hypoesthesia/anesthesia into the palmar side of his left hand. Magnetic resonance images of the cervical spine revealed a left posteromedial C6/C7 disk herniation along with foraminal narrowing. In addition, there were other levels of degeneration, most noted at the C3/C4 spinal level, which also had significant left-sided foraminal narrowing. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Treatment included Cox flexion-distraction protocols aimed to reduce nerve root compression along with supportive physiological therapeutic interventions to aid with pain reduction and functional improvement. The patient was treated a total of 10 times over a course of 4 weeks. The patient reported being pain-free and fully functional 8 months following the conclusion of care. CONCLUSION: This case study demonstrated the use of Cox flexion-distraction for treatment of a patient with a cervical disk herniation, foraminal narrowing, and associated radiating pain and radiculopathy in the left upper extremity.     

Intermittent cervical traction for cervical radiculopathy caused by large-volume herniated disks

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of intermittent cervical traction in managing 4 patients with cervical radiculopathy and large-volume herniated disks. CLINICAL FEATURES: Four patients had neck pain radiating to the arm. The clinical examination was typical in all cases for radiculopathy of cervical origin. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the cervical spine revealed large-volume herniated disks in all patients. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOME: The treatment consisted of intermittent on-the-door cervical traction under the supervision of our physiotherapists. Complete symptom resolution for each patient occurred within 3 weeks. One patient who had an episode of recurrence 16 months after the first treatment was successfully managed again with cervical traction and physiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Cervical spine traction could be considered as a therapy of choice for radiculopathy caused by herniated disks, even in cases of large-volume herniated disks or recurrent episodes.     

Incidence of ponticulus posterior of the atlas in migraine and cervicogenic headache

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of the ponticulus posticus is far from clear. It has been associated with headaches, Barré-Lieou syndrome, photophobia, and migraine. However, little epidemiologic evidence for this exists. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship of ponticulus posticus on x-ray studies and headache symptoms in a series of chiropractic patients. METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-five patients who visited a chiropractic clinic for the first time and whose conditions required cervical spine x-ray examinations were studied. Complaints were categorized as migraine with aura, migraine without aura, cervicogenic headache, neck pain only, and other conditions. The presence or absence of the ponticulus posticus (whether partial or complete) was determined by means of a lateral cervical film and noted as a positive or negative finding. The data were analyzed by frequency analysis and Pearson's chi 2 test. RESULTS: Forty-six percent of the sample were men and the predominant complaint was neck pain (33%). Most patients were in the fourth decade of life. The frequencies of the other complaints were migraine with aura (7%), migraine without aura (4%), cervicogenic headache (22%), other conditions (33%). An 18% prevalence of ponticulus posticus was found. This finding was significantly associated with migraine without aura (chi 2 = 4.97; P = .03) and not with any other conditions. CONCLUSION: In a chiropractic patient population that required cervical x-ray examinations, a significant association was found between ponticulus posticus and migraine without aura, with an odds ratio of 2.19:1 in favor of this complaint being present with the osseous anomaly. The mechanism for this remains obscure but may be related to ischemic compression of the vertebral artery or by dural tension at the craniocervical junction.     

Zervikogener Kopfschmerz – Klinik, Differentialdiagnose und Therapie

Headache in association with the cervical spine is often misdiagnosed and treated inadequately because of confusing and varying terminology. Primary headaches such as tension-type headache and migraine are incorrectly categorized as “cervicogenic” merely because of their occipital localization. Cervicogenic headache described by Sjastaad presents as a unilateral headache of fluctuating intensity increased by movement of the head and typically radiating from occipital to frontal regions. Definition, pathophysiology, differental diagnosis and therapy of cervicogenic headache are demonstrated. Ipsilateral blockades of the C2–3 root and/or major occipital nerve allow differentiation between migraine and other primary headache syndromes. Neither pharmacological nor surgical or chiropractic procedures lead to an improvement or remission of cervicogenic headache. Pain of various anatomical regions possibly joins to form a common anatomical pathway and then presents as cervicogenic headache, which should therefore be understood as a homogeneous but also non-specific reaction pattern.     

Uneventful upper cervical manipulation in the presence of a damaged vertebral artery

OBJECTIVE: To discuss a case in which a patient with a previously injured vertebral artery underwent manipulation in the upper cervical spine without alteration of her symptom pattern. The literature concerning the relative safety of specific upper cervical manipulative techniques is reviewed. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 42-year-old woman had a 3-week history of unilateral suboccipital pain that she related to a sudden twisting of her head and neck that occurred while she was putting sheets of drywall on top of her car. Subsequent examination by a neurologist 2 weeks later was unremarkable, and a tension-type headache was diagnosed. Approximately 10 days later (3 weeks after injury), a single high-velocity upper-cervical manipulation (incorporating slight rotation and full lateral flexion) was performed with no change in her symptom pattern. Two weeks after that, the patient had development of a lateral medullary syndrome (also known as Wallenberg syndrome) after she briefly extended and rotated her upper cervical spine while painting a ceiling. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was treated with anticoagulant therapy, and the lateral medullary infarct healed without incident. The spinocerebellar and subtle motor symptoms also resolved, but the ipsilateral suboccipital headache and the loss of temperature sensation associated with the spinothalamic tract lesion were still present 9 months later. CONCLUSION: This case report demonstrates that vigorous manipulation of the upper cervical spine is possible without injuring an already damaged vertebral artery. It is suggested that the line of drive used during the single manipulation, almost pure lateral flexion with slight rotation, was responsible for the apparent innocuous response. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of vertebral artery dissection are reviewed. Because it is currently impossible to identify patients at risk of having a dissected vertebral artery with standard in-office examination procedures, rotational manipulation of the upper cervical spine should be abandoned by all practitioners, and schools should remove such techniques from their curriculums.     

Cervicogenic headache: Results of computer-based measurements of cervical spine mobility in 15 patients

Head and neck pain are often attributed to impaired mobility of the cervical spine. No established methods exist to examine such an impaired mobility objectively in patients with cervicogenic headache. Therefore, functional roentgenograms of the cervical spine in maximum ventral and dorsal flexion were analyzed in 15 patients with cervicogenic headache and in 18 controls. Qualitative radiologic evaluation showed no significant differences in either group. A computer-based technique to assess the mobility of the cervical spine demonstrated a statistically pronounced hypomobility of the craniocervical joints C0/C2 and an impaired overall mobility of the upper cervical spine (C0-C5) in the cervicogenic headache group. The most evident hypomotility was found in segment C0/C1. Interesting was, furthermore, a probably compensatory hypermotility in segment C6/C7. These findings did not correlate with the results of the qualitative radiologic evaluation.     

Seventh cervical rib associated with subclavian artery occlusion and multiple infarcts: case report

A cervical rib, or supernumerary (extra) rib arising from the 7th cervical vertebra, is a congenital abnormality that occurs in less than 1% of the population. Clinically, it can cause obscure nervous or vascular symptoms and be difficult to diagnose. In this rare case, a 37-year-old woman developed a subclavian artery occlusion after undergoing a chiropractic manipulation for neck, shoulder, and arm pain. The occlusion led to multiple cerebellar infarcts, frontal subarachnoid hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and right-hand vascular compromise. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with a 7th cervical rib, which likely caused compression of the subclavian artery after a hyperextension injury sustained during the chiropractic procedure. The departments of vascular surgery, neurosurgery, cardiology, and neurology collaborated to review all elements of the patient's diagnosis and care. After the patient was stabilized, she spent 6 weeks in acute inpatient rehabilitation; upon discharge, her symptoms were greatly improved but still present. Three months later, the patient underwent a subclavian-artery-to-axillary-artery bypass with resection of the left cervical rib. She tolerated surgery well with no complications. As a result of the devastating insults sustained secondary to the presence of the 7th cervical rib and her subclavian artery occlusion, this patient faced months of recovery. Treatment involved a structured interdisciplinary plan of care.     

Active range of motion in the cervical spine increases after spinal manipulation (toggle recoil)

BACKGROUND: It has generally been assumed that spinal manipulation has the biomechanical effect of increasing spinal range of motion. Past research has shown that there are likely no lasting changes to passive range of motion, and it is unclear whether there is an increase in active range of motion after manipulation. OBJECTIVE: To study changes in active cervical range of motion after spinal manipulation of the cervical spine. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized controlled trial at the outpatient clinic Phillip Chiropractic Research Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: One hundred five patients with cervicogenic headache were randomized into 2 groups. After a baseline observation period, Group 2 received manipulation (toggle recoil) to the cervical spine, whereas Group 1 received sham manipulation. In the next trial phase, Group 1 received manipulation, whereas Group 2 received no treatment. This was followed by the final trial phase, in which Group 2 received sham manipulation and Group 1 received no treatment. After each trial phase, active range of cervical motion was measured with a strap-on head goniometer by 2 blinded examiners. RESULTS: After receiving spinal manipulation, active range of motion in the cervical spine increased significantly (P < .0006) in Group 2 compared with Group 1, and this difference between the treatment groups disappeared after the third trial phase in which Group 1 also received manipulation, as expected. CONCLUSION: Spinal manipulation of the cervical spine increases active range of motion.     

Diagnosis and Management of Cervicogenic Headache and Local Cervical Syndrome with Multiple Pain Generators

Abstract

Numerous pain generators can be responsible for cervicogenic headache and pain in both the cervical and thoracic regions. A 45-year-old female presented in the clinic with a 20-year history of cervicogenic and migraine headaches, accompanied by a prolonged history of local cervical and interscapular pain. The cervicogenic symptoms were attributed to secondary discrelated changes in the cervical spine, as evidenced by specific provocation behaviors and segmental limitation patterns. The patient was educated regarding the presenting problems, and ergonomic changes were initiated. The limitations were addressed with joint-specific mobilization techniques, accompanied by specific home exercises. The patient demonstrated initial rapid improvements that were characterized by reduced symptoms and increased motion, followed by gradual full motion recovery and resolution of cervicogenic symptoms. This recovery pattern suggests the efficacy of manual techniques in the management of cervicogenic headaches and local cervical syndrome, even in the context of rather prolonged symptoms.     

Missed cervical spine fracture: chiropractic implications

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the case of a patient with an anterior compression fracture of the cervical spine, which had been overlooked on initial examination. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 36-year-old man was seen at a chiropractic clinic 1 month after diving into the ocean and hitting his head on the ocean floor. He chipped a tooth but denied loss of consciousness. Initial medical examination in the emergency department did not include radiography, but an anti-inflammatory medication was prescribed. Radiographs taken at the chiropractic clinic 1 month later revealed an anterior compression fracture of the C7 vertebra, with migration of the fragment noted on flexion and extension views. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: The patient was referred back to his medical doctor for further evaluation and management.He was instructed to wear a Philadelphia collar for 4 weeks. During this time period, he reported "shooting" pain and tingling from his neck into his arms. The patient reported resolution of his neck and arm symptoms at 2.5 months after injury. Follow-up radiographs at 6 months after injury revealed fusion of the fracture fragment with mild residual deformity. At that time, the patient began a course of chiropractic treatment. CONCLUSION: After head trauma, it is essential to obtain a radiograph of the cervical spine to rule out fracture. Chiropractors should proceed with caution, regardless of any prior medical or ancillary evaluation, before commencing cervical spine manipulation after head and neck trauma.     

Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility in patients with chronic, nontraumatic cervical spine pain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility (head repositioning accuracy to subjective straight ahead) in patients with chronic, nontraumatic cervical spine pain. DESIGN: A prospective, 2-group, observational design. SETTING: An outpatient chiropractic clinic in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven patients (6 men, 5 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 41.1 +/- 13.3 yr; range, 18-55 yr) with chronic, nontraumatic cervical spine pain (mean duration, 24 +/- 18 mo), with no evidence of cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy or any other neurologic disorder. Eleven asymptomatic, unimpaired volunteers (5 men, 6 women; mean age, 39.3 +/- 10.3 yr; range, 28-54 yr) with no history of whiplash or other cervical spine injury or pain served as controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility was investigated by testing the ability of blindfolded participants to relocate accurately the head on the trunk, to a subjective straight-ahead position, after a near-maximal active movement of the head in the horizontal or vertical plane. The active cervical range of motion and the duration and intensity of neck pain were also recorded. RESULTS: Mann-Whitney U testing indicated that the patient (P) group was no less accurate in head repositioning than the control (C) group for all movement directions except flexion (median global positioning error [95% confidence interval], P = 5.7 degrees [5.03-9.10], C = 4.2 degrees [3.17-5.32]; p <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nontraumatic neck pain patients show little evidence of impaired cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility. These results contrast with studies of chronic cervical pain patients in which the origin was not controlled or involved a cervical whiplash injury.     

A new 3-point bending traction method for restoring cervical lordosis and cervical manipulation: a nonrandomized clinical controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new 3-point bending type of cervical traction. DESIGN: Nonrandomized controlled trial of prospective, consecutive patients compared with control subjects. Follow-up patient data were obtained at 3 and 15(1/2) months, and 8 1/10 months for controls. SETTING: Data were collected at a spine clinic in Nevada. PATIENTS: Volunteer subjects consisted of 30 patients and 24 controls. Subjects had cervicogenic pain (neck pain, headaches, arm pain, and/or numbness). Subjects were included if their Ruth Jackson radiographic stress lines measured less than 25 degrees but were excluded if they had suspected disk herniation or canal stenosis. All subjects completed the first follow-up examinations, and 25 of 30 patients completed the long-term follow-up examination. INTERVENTIONS: Spinal manipulation for pain and a new form of 3-point bending cervical traction to improve lordosis. Cervical manipulation was provided for the first 3 to 4 weeks of treatment. Traction treatment consisted of 3 to 5 sessions per week for 9 +/- 1 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Besides pain visual analog scale (VAS) ratings, pre- and posttreatment lateral cervical radiographs were analyzed. RESULTS: Control subjects reported no change in the pain VAS ratings and had no statistically significant change in segmental or global radiographic alignment. For the traction group, VAS ratings were 4.3 pretreatment and 1.6 posttreatment. Traction group radiographic measurements showed statistically significant improvements (P <.008 in all instances of statistical significance), including anterior head weight bearing (improved 6.2mm), Cobb angle at C2-7 (improved 12.1 degrees ), and angle between posterior tangents at C2-7 (improved 14.2 degrees ). For the treatment group, at 15(1/2)-month follow-up, only minimal loss of C2-7 lordosis (3.5 degrees ) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal cervical traction with transverse load at midneck (2-way cervical traction) combined with cervical manipulation can improve cervical lordosis in 8 to 10 weeks as indicated by increases in segmental and global cervical alignment. Magnitude of lordosis at C2-7 remained stable at long-term follow-up.     

Characterization of cervicogenic headache

Abstract

Headache is a symptom commonly treated by physical therapies. Towards evidence based practices, these therapies are being evaluated in randomized controlled trials. Tension headache has received most attention. Logically, physical treatments of the cervical musculoskeletal system are appropriate for the management of headaches arising from neck dysfunction; that is, cervicogenic headache. There are difficulties in always selecting suitable headache patients for study and for treatment in everyday clinical practice. This review examines the characteristics of cervicogenic headache for differential diagnosis. There is considerable symptomatic overlap between cervicogenic headache and other chronic headache forms such as tension headache and migraine without aura. The symptomatic criteria for cervicogenic headache are well researched, but current physical diagnostic criteria are often non-specific and non-discriminatory. The possibilities for new physical diagnostic criteria are explored with the aim of helping the clinician and researcher to better identify the cervicogenic headache patient. These are based on current research into physical impairments in the musculoskeletal system with neck pain.