Protamine sulfate reduces the susceptibility of thermally injured mice to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection

BACKGROUND: In this study, we investigated the ability of protamine sulfate, at sub-bactericidal dosing, to interfere with the in vivo virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1) during burn wound infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted using the murine model of thermal injury. Preliminary experiments determined a protocol for administration of protamine sulfate that had no in vivo bactericidal effects. Based on this, the effect of local injection of protamine sulfate on the in vivo virulence of PAO1 was assessed using these parameters: (1) the percent mortality among PAO1-infected, thermally injured mice; (2) the local proliferation and spread of PAO1 within the infected burned tissue; (3) the systemic spread of PAO1 within thermally injured/infected mice; and (4) the local cytokine response elicited by PAO1 thermally injured/infected mice. RESULTS: Injection of protamine sulfate into the thermally injured tissue of PAO1-infected/thermally injured mice significantly decreased the percent mortality and inhibited the systemic dissemination of PAO1 microorganisms to the liver and spleen. It had no effect, however, on the ability of the bacteria to proliferate and spread within the thermally injured tissue. It also was determined that protamine sulfate was ineffective at preventing mouse death at the dose administered if injected intramuscularly instead of directly into burned tissue. Protamine sulfate reduced the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and LIF in the injured/infected tissue. Heparan sulfate given in conjunction with protamine sulfate returned mortality levels to those of untreated mice. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that: (1) local injection of sub-bactericidal doses of protamine sulfate reduces the virulence of P. aeruginosa; (2) this effect is due to interference with the systemic rather than local spread of P. aeruginosa; and (3) local application of protamine sulfate may have potential as supportive therapy for prevention of systemic P. aeruginosa infection in severely burned patients.     

Assessment of the Effectiveness of Silver-Coated Dressing,Chlorhexidine Acetate (0.5%), Citric Acid (3%), and Silver Sulfadiazine (1%) for Topical Antibacterial Effects Against the Multi-Drug Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infecting Full-Skin Thickness Burn Wounds on Rats

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of four different topical antimicrobial dressings on a multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa contaminated full-thickness burn wound rat model. A total of 40 adult male Wistar albino rats were used. The control group (group 1), silver sulfadiazine (1%) group 2, chlorhexidine acetate (0.5%) group 3, citric acid (3%) group 4, and silver-coated dressing group 5 were compared to assess the antibacterial effects of a daily application to a 30% full-skin thickness burn wound seeded 10 minutes earlier with 10⁸ CFU (colony forming unit)/0.5 mL of a multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain. Five groups (1 control group and 4 treatment groups) were compared. The administration of third-degree burns to all rats was confirmed based on histopathologic data. The tissue cultures from groups 2 and 5 exhibited significant differences compared to those of the other 3 groups, whereas no significant differences were observed between groups 1, 3, and 4. The effectiveness of the treatments was as follows: 1% silver sulfadiazine > silver-coated dressing > 3% citric acid > 0.5% chlorhexidine acetate > control group. Our results supported the efficacy of topical therapy by silver sulfadiazine and silver-coated dressing on infections caused by multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas spp.