Femoral neck non-unions: how do I do it?

Femoral head necrosis and non-union are frequent complications after femoral neck fracture. The main reason for failure leading to non-union is an inadequate osteosynthesis and/or poor mechanical conditions, leading to instability. Criteria for optima reduction and fixation techniques, which can prevent non-union in the majority of cases, are described. This knowledge is mandatory for each surgeon as in the non-expert situation up to 30% inadequacy of the "simple" procedure occurs! Although in the elderly endoprosthetic replacement is the treatment of first choice, in the younger and active patients the treatment should be directed towards salvage of the own hip. In non-complex cases a valgisation osteotomy according to Pauwels will lead to very good results. The technique of this secondary procedure is demonstrated by a case report. In case of combined pathology with (complete) a vascular necrosis of the femoral head, the age threshold for endoprosthetic replacement will be far lower nowadays, but even in those cases, especially below the age of 50, salvage procedures with free fibular grafting lead to a good outcome and form a useful alternative.     

"CF asthma": what is it and what do we do about it?

The diagnosis of "CF asthma" is problematic and it is difficult to determine which patients have a combination of CF and asthma and which have asthma like symptoms caused by inflammation of the CF lung. This may not matter, however; the relevance lies in the possible approaches to treatment.     

How to do it—laparoscopic resection rectopexy

Introduction  

A variety of surgical strategies have been suggested and many surgical techniques, both abdominal and perineal, have been introduced for treatment of rectal prolapse. All these techniques and approaches are based on the attempt to restore the normal anatomy and physiologic function.     

How do I do it? Passing a Pedicled Flap Through a Subcutaneous Tunnel

Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps are used to cover body structures or replace tissue that has been lost due to trauma, infection, or surgical excision for tumor. Transfer of these flaps from donor to recipient site is a vital step of surgery as forceful passage of flap may cause damage to blood supply of flap or devitalize the tissue by excessive shearing force. Use of polyvinyl chloride bag for transfer of latissimus dorsi flap through subcutaneous tunnel has been found to be very effective in dealing with this problem.     

Managing scaphoid fractures. How we do it?

The scaphoid is the common carpal bone to be fractured. Proper clinical and radiological evaluation is required to establish it's diagnosis. The management of acute fractures includes conservative treatment with cast in minimally displaced to open reduction and internal fixation in case of displaced ones. The established nonunion requires open reduction, bone grafting and internal fixation.     

I think I have a good idea: what do I do with it?

The orthopaedic device industry is an ever changing market, often guided by creative surgeons who have the common goal of creating a solution to a problem. While being a surgeon-inventor can be both a challenging and rewarding process, there are several steps that the individual must follow to create intellectual property. This article serves as a guide to the novice surgeon-inventor; intended to be used as an early stage reference for those interested in taking their "solution to a problem" to the device industry.     

How I do it – selective amygdalohippocampectomy via subtemporal approach

Background

Surgery is superior over medicamentous treatment of pharmacoresistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy caused by hippocampal sclerosis. The armamentarium of surgical procedures comprises standard temporal lobectomy and more selective procedures. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy can be performed via transcortical, transsylvian or subtemporal approach.

Method

Describe the selective amygdalohippocampectomy through the subtemporal approach

Conclusion

After the detailed preoperative epilepsy evaluation, surgery can be offered to pharmacoresistant epilepsy patient with hippocampal sclerosis. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy can be safely performed through the subtemporal approach. The good knowledge of the mesial temporal lobe anatomy is necessary when performing this procedure.

Key points

? Perform the subtemporal craniotomy with additional bone removal up to temporal petrous part to minimize retraction of the brain. ? Release the CSF from the subarachnoid sulcal space in order to relax the temporal lobe. Dissect the arachnoid around basal temporal veins and protect them with hemostatic material in order to avoid vein rupture. ? After gyrus fusiformis corticotomy, always follow the white matter in order to enter the temporal horn. ? Place the self-retraining retractor gently to secure an unobstructed view of the intraventricular mesial temporal lobe structures. ? Visualize the choroid plexus and the inferior choroidal point. They represent the two most important landmarks. ? While performing the anterior disconnection the goal is to reach the arachnoid of the interpeduncular and crural cistern medially and the tentorial edge laterally. ? Follow the tentorial edge and the arachnoid of the temporal base to securely perform the lateral disconnection. ? Perform the posterior disconnection at the level of the mesencephalon superior colliculi. ? During the medial disconnection the dissection of the arachnoid of the hippocampal sulcus must be done as close to the hippocampus as possible in order to avoid damage to the brain stem perforators or the loop of the anterior choroidal artery. ? Knowledge of mesial temporal lobe anatomy is crucial.     

Comparative effectiveness research: what is it and why do we need it in nephrology?

The USA leads other industrialized countries in health care spending but lags behind in terms of health outcomes. There has been growing interest in comparative effectiveness research (CER) as a means to identify best practices to create a more efficient and effective health care system. Two key concepts of CER are that it should (i) compare two or more alternative tests, therapies or procedures and (ii) be conducted in persons, clinical settings and conditions that are representative of the real world. The goal of CER is to provide evidence for clinicians, patients, policy makers and others to make informed decisions that will ultimately improve the overall health of specific subgroups and of the population as a whole. In this narrative review, we first describe the strengths and limitations of various types of studies that constitute CER, including randomized clinical trials, observational studies and systematic reviews, providing examples from the nephrology literature. Because of the concerns regarding confounding in observational CER, we also provide an overview of methods to reduce confounding in these types of studies. Finally, we will discuss why CER pertaining to kidney disease care needs to be a top priority in order to move our field from a largely opinion-based specialty to an evidence-based specialty.