Pulmonary Artery Denervation for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Sham-Controlled Randomized PADN-CFDA Trial

BackgroundWorld Health Organization (WHO) group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive, debilitating disease. Previous observational studies have demonstrated that pulmonary artery denervation (PADN) reduces pulmonary artery pressures in PAH. However, the safety and effectiveness of PADN have not been established in a randomized trial.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the treatment effects of PADN in patients with group 1 PAH.MethodsPatients with WHO group 1 PAH not taking PAH-specific drugs for at least 30 days were enrolled in a multicenter, sham-controlled, single-blind, randomized trial. Patients were assigned to receive PADN plus a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor or a sham procedure plus a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in the change in 6-minute walk distance from baseline to 6 months.ResultsAmong 128 randomized patients, those treated with PADN compared with sham had a greater improvement in 6-minute walk distance from baseline to 6 months (mean adjusted between-group difference 33.8 m; 95% CI: 16.7-50.9 m; P < 0.001). From baseline to 6 months, pulmonary vascular resistance was reduced by ?3.0 ± 0.3 WU after PADN and ?1.9 ± 0.3 WU after sham (adjusted difference ?1.4; 95% CI: ?2.6 to ?0.2). PADN also improved right ventricular function, reduced tricuspid regurgitation, and decreased N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide. Clinical worsening was less (1.6% vs 13.8%; OR: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01-0.87), and a satisfactory clinical response was greater (57.1% vs 32.3%; OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.37-5.82) with PADN treatment during 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsIn patients with WHO group 1 PAH, PADN improved exercise capacity, hemodynamic status, and clinical outcomes during 6-month follow-up. (Safety and Efficacy of Pulmonary Artery Denervation in Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension [PADN-CFDA]; NCT03282266)     

Alcohol-Mediated Renal Denervation Using the Peregrine System Infusion Catheter for Treatment of Hypertension

ObjectivesThe aim of this multicenter, open-label trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of alcohol-mediated renal denervation using a novel catheter system (the Peregrine System Infusion Catheter) for the infusion of dehydrated alcohol as a neurolytic agent into the renal periarterial space.BackgroundThe number of hypertensive patients with uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) remains unacceptably high. The renal sympathetic nervous system has been identified as an attractive therapeutic target.MethodsForty-five patients with uncontrolled hypertension on ≥3 antihypertensive medications underwent bilateral renal denervation using the Peregrine Catheter with 0.6 ml alcohol infused per renal artery.ResultsAll patients were treated as intended. Mean 24-h ambulatory BP reduction at 6 months versus baseline was −11 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: −15 to −7 mm Hg) for systolic BP and −7 mm Hg (95% CI: −9 to −4 mm Hg) for diastolic BP (p < 0.001 for both). Office systolic BP was reduced by −18/−10 mm Hg (95% CI: −25 to −12/−13 to −6 mm Hg) at 6 months. Antihypertensive medications were reduced in 23% and increased in 5% of patients at 6 months. Adherence to the antihypertensive regimen remained stable over time. The primary safety endpoint, defined as the absence of periprocedural major vascular complications, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or death within 1 month, was met in 96% of patients (95% CI: 85% to 99%). Two patients had major adverse events of periprocedural access-site pseudoaneurysms, with major bleeding in one. There were no deaths or instances of myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or renal artery stenosis. Transient microleaks were noted in 42% and 49% of the left and right main renal arteries, respectively. There were 2 cases of minor vessel dissection that resolved without treatment.ConclusionsPrimary results from this trial suggest that alcohol-mediated renal denervation using the Peregrine Catheter safely reduces blood pressure and as such may represent a novel approach for the treatment of hypertension.     

Renal Denervation for Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Blinded,Placebo-Controlled Trials

ObjectivesThe authors performed an updated meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials of renal denervation and specifically compared the effect of renal denervation in patients taking medications and in those not taking medications.BackgroundRenal denervation has now undergone several blinded placebo-controlled trials, covering the spectrum from patients with drug-resistant hypertension to those not yet taking antihypertensive medications.MethodsAll blinded placebo-controlled randomized trials of catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for hypertension were systematically identified, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in ambulatory systolic blood pressure beyond the effect of the placebo procedure. Analysis was stratified by whether there was background antihypertensive medication use.ResultsThere were 7 eligible trials, totaling 1,368 patients. Denervation significantly reduced ambulatory systolic (mean difference −3.61 mm Hg; 95% CI: −4.89 to –2.33 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), ambulatory diastolic (−1.85 mm Hg; 95% CI: −2.78 to −0.92 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), office systolic (−5.86 mm Hg; 95% CI: −7.77 to −3.94 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), and office diastolic (−3.63 mm Hg; 95% CI: −4.77 to −2.50; P < 0.0001) blood pressure. There was no evidence that the use of concomitant antihypertensive medication had a significant impact on the effect of denervation on any of these endpoints (P_interaction = NS for each comparison).ConclusionsThe randomized placebo-controlled trials show consistently that renal denervation provides significant reduction in ambulatory and office blood pressure. Although the magnitude of benefit, about 4/2 mm Hg, is modest, it is similar between patients on background antihypertensive medications and those who are not. Denervation could therefore be a useful strategy at various points for patients who are not willing to add antihypertensive agents. Whether the effect changes with time is currently unknown.     

Sleep Positional Therapy for Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Double-Blind,Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

1. Download : Download high-res image (381KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Renal Denervation in High-Risk Patients With Hypertension

BackgroundRenal denervation (RDN) is under investigation for treatment of uncontrolled hypertension and might represent an attractive treatment for patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk. It is important to determine whether baseline CV risk affects the efficacy of RDN.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to assess blood pressure (BP) reduction and event rates after RDN in patients with various comorbidities, testing the hypothesis that RDN is effective and durable in these high-risk populations.MethodsBP reduction and adverse events over 3 years were evaluated for several high-risk subgroups in the GSR (Global proSpective registrY for syMPathetic renaL denervatIon in seleCted IndicatIons Through 3 Years Registry), an international registry of RDN in patients with uncontrolled hypertension (n = 2,652). Comparisons were made for patients age ≥65 years versus age <65 years, with versus without isolated systolic hypertension, with versus without atrial fibrillation, and with versus without diabetes mellitus. Baseline cardiovascular risk was estimated using the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score.ResultsReduction in 24-h systolic BP at 3 years was −8.9 ± 20.1 mm Hg for the overall cohort, and for high-risk subgroups, BP reduction was −10.4 ± 21.0 mm Hg for resistant hypertension, −8.7 ± 17.4 mm Hg in patients age ≥65 years, −10.2 ± 17.9 mm Hg in patients with diabetes, −8.6 ± 18.7 mm Hg in isolated systolic hypertension, −10.1 ± 20.3 mm Hg in chronic kidney disease, and −10.0 ± 19.1 mm Hg in atrial fibrillation (p < 0.0001 compared with baseline for all). BP reduction in patients with measurements at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months showed similar reductions in office and 24-h BP for patients with varying baseline ASCVD risk scores, which was sustained to 3 years. Adverse event rates at 3 years were higher for patients with higher baseline CV risk.ConclusionsBP reduction after RDN was similar for patients with varying high-risk comorbidities and across the range of ASCVD risk scores. The impact of baseline risk on clinical event reduction by RDN-induced BP changes could be evaluated in further studies. (Global proSpective registrY for syMPathetic renaL denervatIon in seleCted IndicatIons Through 3 Years Registry; NCT01534299)     

Renal Denervation for Treating Hypertension: Current Scientific and Clinical Evidence

Initial studies of catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for uncontrolled HTN using radiofrequency ablation in the main renal arteries showed that RDN was effective in lowering office blood pressure (BP). However, the first randomized sham-controlled trial, SYMPLICITY-HTN-3, did not show significantly lower office or 24-h ambulatory systolic BP compared with sham treatment. Subsequent studies in both animals and humans demonstrated the potential importance of more distal and branch renal artery radiofrequency ablation, and a second-generation multielectrode system became available. Two recent randomized sham-controlled trials in patients not taking antihypertensive drugs (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED) or continuing to take drugs (SPYRAL HTN-ON MED) performed RDN with the second-generation radiofrequency ablation system using an ablation protocol that included treatment of the distal renal artery as well as the branch renal arteries. These studies showed that RDN significantly reduced office and 24-h ambulatory BP compared with sham treatment. Another recent randomized sham-controlled trial in patients not receiving medications showed that RDN with catheter-based ultrasound (RADIANCE-HTN SOLO) applied in just the main renal arteries significantly lowered daytime ambulatory and office BP compared with sham treatment. These trials have renewed clinical and scientific interest in defining the appropriate role of RDN in hypertension treatment. In addition, other important issues will need to be addressed in the future such as the development of tests to determine the extent of RDN at the time of the procedure and the potential of renal nerve fibers to regain their patency at some later stage following the ablation procedure.     

12-Month Results From the Unblinded Phase of the RADIANCE-HTN SOLO Trial of Ultrasound Renal Denervation

ObjectivesThis study reports the 12-month results of the RADIANCE-HTN (A Study of the ReCor Medical Paradise System in Clinical Hypertension) SOLO trial following unblinding of patients at 6 months.BackgroundThe blood pressure (BP)–lowering efficacy and safety of endovascular ultrasound renal denervation (RDN) in the absence (2 months) and presence (6 months) of antihypertensive medications were previously reported.MethodsPatients with daytime ambulatory BP ≥135/85 mm Hg after 4 weeks off medication were randomized to RDN (n = 74) or sham (n = 72) and maintained off medication for 2 months. A standardized medication escalation protocol was instituted between 2 and 5 months (blinded phase). Between 6 and 12 months (unblinded phase), patients received antihypertensive medications at physicians’ discretion. Outcomes at 12 months included medication burden, change in daytime ambulatory systolic BP (dASBP) and office or home systolic BP (SBP), visit-to-visit variability in SBP, and safety.ResultsSixty-five of 74 RDN patients and 67 of 72 sham patients had 12-month dASBP measurements. The proportion of patients on ≥2 medications (27.7% vs. 44.8%; p = 0.041), the number of medications (1.0 vs. 1.4; p = 0.015), and defined daily dose (1.4 vs. 2.2; p = 0.007) were less with RDN versus sham. The decrease in dASBP from baseline in the RDN group (−16.5 ± 12.9 mm Hg) remained stable at 12 months. The RDN versus sham adjusted difference at 12 months was −2.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: −5.9 to 1.3 mm Hg; p = 0.201) for dASBP, −6.3 mm Hg (95% CI: −11.1 to −1.5 mm Hg; p = 0.010) for office SBP, and −3.4 mm Hg (95% CI: −6.9 to 0.1 mm Hg; p = 0.062) for home SBP. Visit-to-visit variability in SBP was smaller in the RDN group. No renal artery injury was detected on computed tomographic or magnetic resonance angiography.ConclusionsDespite unblinding, the BP-lowering effect of RDN was maintained at 12 months with fewer prescribed medications compared with sham.     

Changes in Plasma Renin Activity After Renal Artery Sympathetic Denervation

BackgroundThe renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays a key role in blood pressure (BP) regulation and is the target of several antihypertensive medications. Renal denervation (RDN) is thought to interrupt the sympathetic-mediated neurohormonal pathway as part of its mechanism of action to reduce BP.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate plasma renin activity (PRA) and aldosterone before and after RDN and to assess whether these baseline neuroendocrine markers predict response to RDN.MethodsAnalyses were conducted in patients with confirmed absence of antihypertensive medication. Aldosterone and PRA levels were compared at baseline and 3 months post-procedure for RDN and sham control groups. Patients in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal trial were separated into 2 groups, those with baseline PRA ≥0.65 ng/ml/h (n = 110) versus <0.65 ng/ml/h (n = 116). Follow-up treatment differences between RDN and sham control groups were adjusted for baseline values using multivariable linear regression models.ResultsBaseline PRA was similar between RDN and control groups (1.0 ± 1.1 ng/ml/h vs. 1.1 ± 1.1 ng/ml/h; p = 0.37). Change in PRA at 3 months from baseline was significantly greater for RDN compared with control subjects (?0.2 ± 1.0 ng/ml/h; p = 0.019 vs. 0.1 ± 0.9 ng/ml/h; p = 0.14), p = 0.001 for RDN versus control subjects, and similar differences were seen for aldosterone: RDN compared with control subjects (?1.2 ± 6.4 ng/dl; p = 0.04 vs. 0.4 ± 5.4 ng/dl; p = 0.40), p = 0.011. Treatment differences at 3 months in 24-h and office systolic blood pressure (SBP) for RDN versus control patients were significantly greater for patients with baseline PRA ≥0.65 ng/ml/h versus <0.65 ng/ml/h, despite similar baseline BP. Differences in office SBP changes according to baseline PRA were also observed earlier at 2 weeks post-RDN.ConclusionsPlasma renin activity and aldosterone levels for RDN patients were significantly reduced at 3 months when compared with baseline as well as when compared with sham control. Higher baseline PRA levels were associated with a significantly greater reduction in office and 24-h SBP. (SPYRAL PIVOTAL - SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Study; NCT02439749)     

Femoral or Radial Approach in Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion: A Randomized Clinical Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare transradial access (TRA) with transfemoral access (TFA) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).BackgroundTRA reduces the risk for vascular access complications but may make complex PCI, such as CTO PCI, more challenging.MethodsFORT CTO (Femoral or Radial Approach in the Treatment of Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion) (NCT03265769) was a prospective, noninferiority, randomized controlled study of TRA vs TFA for CTO PCI. The primary study endpoint was procedural success, defined as technical success without any in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary study endpoint was major access-site complications.ResultsBetween 2017 and 2021, 610 of 800 patients referred for CTO PCI at 4 centers were randomized to TRA (n = 305) or TFA (n = 305). Mean J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) (2.1 ± 0.1 vs 2.2 ± 0.1; P = 0.279), PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) (1.3 ± 0.9 vs 1.1 ± 1.0; P = 0.058) and PROGRESS CTO complication (2.4 ± 1.8 vs 2.3 ± 1.8; P = 0.561) scores and use of the retrograde approach (11% vs 14%; P = 0.342) were similar in the TRA and TFA groups. TRA was noninferior to TFA for procedural success (84% vs 86%; P = 0.563) but had fewer access-site complications (2.0% vs 5.6%; P = 0.019). There was no difference between TFA and TRA in procedural duration, contrast volume, or radiation dose.COnclusionsTRA was noninferior to TFA for CTO PCI but had fewer access-site complications.     

Detection of Colorectal Neoplasms Using Linked Color Imaging: A Prospective,Randomized, Tandem Colonoscopy Trial

Background and aimsA higher adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been shown to be related to a lower incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer. We analyzed the efficacy of linked color imaging (LCI) by assessing the detection, miss, and visibility of various featured adenomas as compared with white light imaging (WLI).MethodsThis was a prospective, randomized, tandem trial. The participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups: first observation by LCI, then second observation by WLI (LCI group); or both observations by WLI (WLI group). Suspected neoplastic lesions were resected after magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy. The primary outcome was to compare the ADR during the first observation. Secondary outcomes included evaluation of adenoma miss rate (AMR) and visibility score.ResultsA total of 780 patients were randomized, 700 of whom were included in the final analysis. The ADR was 69.6% and 63.2% in the LCI and WLI groups, respectively, with no significant difference. However, LCI improved the average ADR in low-detectors compared with high-detectors (76.0% vs 55.1%; P < .001). Total AMR was 20.6% in the LCI group, which was significantly lower than that in the WLI group (31.1%) (P < .001). AMR in the LCI group was significantly lower, especially for diminutive adenomas (23.4% vs 35.1%; P < .001) and nonpolypoid lesions (25.6% vs 37.9%; P < .001) compared with the WLI group.ConclusionAlthough both methods provided a similar ADR, LCI had a lower AMR than WLI. LCI could benefit endoscopists with lower ADR, an observation that warrants additional study. (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, Number: UMIN000026359).     

Optimal Timing of Intervention in NSTE-ACS Without Pre-Treatment: The EARLY Randomized Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare a delayed and a very early invasive strategy in patients with non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) without pre-treatment.BackgroundThe optimal delay of the invasive strategy in patients with NSTE-ACS remains debated and has never been investigated in patients not pre-treated with P2Y₁₂–adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists.MethodsA prospective, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Altogether, 741 patients presenting with intermediate- or high-risk NSTE-ACS intended for an invasive strategy were included. The modified intention-to-treat analysis was composed of 709 patients after 32 withdrew consent. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the delayed invasive group (DG) (n = 363) with coronary angiography (CA) performed 12 to 72 h after randomization or the very early invasive group (EG) (n = 346) with CA within 2 h. No pre-treatment with a loading dose of a P2Y₁₂–adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonist was allowed before CA. The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death and recurrent ischemic events at 1 month, as determined by a blinded adjudication committee.ResultsMost patients had high-risk NSTE-ACS in both groups (93% in the EG vs. 92.5% in the DG). The median time between randomization and CA was 0 h (interquartile range [IQR]: 0 to 1 h) in the EG group and 18 h (IQR: 11 to 23 h) in the DG. The primary endpoint rate was significantly lower in the EG (4.4% vs. 21.3% in the DG; hazard ratio: 0.20; 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.34; p < 0.001), driven by a reduction in recurrent ischemic events (19.8% vs. 2.9%; p < 0.001). No difference was observed for cardiovascular death.ConclusionsWithout pre-treatment, a very early invasive strategy was associated with a significant reduction in ischemic events at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NSTE-ACS. (Early or Delayed Revascularization for Intermediate and High-Risk Non ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes; NCT02750579)     

Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Versus Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: The SUNSET sPE Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this trial was to determine whether ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT) is superior to standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (SCDT) in pulmonary arterial thrombus reduction for patients with submassive pulmonary embolism (sPE).BackgroundCatheter-directed therapy has been increasingly used in sPE and massive pulmonary embolism as a decompensation prevention and potentially lifesaving procedure. It is unproved whether USAT is superior to SCDT using traditional multiple-side-hole catheters in the treatment of patients with pulmonary embolism.MethodsAdults with sPE were enrolled. Participants were randomized 1:1 to USAT or SCDT. The primary outcome was 48-hour clearance of pulmonary thrombus assessed by pre- and postprocedural computed tomographic angiography using a refined Miller score. Secondary outcomes included improvement in right ventricular–to–left ventricular ratio, intensive care unit and hospital stay, bleeding, and adverse events up to 90 days.ResultsEighty-one patients with acute sPE were randomized and were available for analysis. The mean total dose of alteplase for USAT was 19 ± 7 mg and for SCDT was 18 ± 7 mg (P = 0.53), infused over 14 ± 6 and 14 ± 5 hours, respectively (P = 0.99). In the USAT group, the mean raw pulmonary arterial thrombus score was reduced from 31 ± 4 at baseline to 22 ± 7 (P < 0.001). In the SCDT group, the score was reduced from 33 ± 4 to 23 ± 7 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in mean thrombus score reduction between the 2 groups (P = 0.76). The mean reduction in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio from baseline (1.54 ± 0.30 for USAT, 1.69 ± 0.44 for SCDT) to 48 hours was 0.37 ± 0.34 in the USAT group and 0.59 ± 0.42 in the SCDT group (P = 0.01). Major bleeding (1 stroke and 1 vaginal bleed requiring transfusion) occurred in 2 patients, both in the USAT group.ConclusionsIn the SUNSET sPE (Standard vs. Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism) trial, patients undergoing USAT had similar pulmonary arterial thrombus reduction compared with those undergoing SCDT, using comparable mean lytic doses and durations of lysis.     

Randomized Clinical Trial on Prevention of Radial Occlusion After Transradial Access Using Nitroglycerin: PATENS Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate whether administration of nitroglycerin at the beginning or end of a transradial approach (TRA) procedure would preserve radial patency.BackgroundThe TRA is becoming the preferred vascular access route in coronary interventions. Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is the most frequent complication. Routine vasodilator treatment aims to reduce spasm and possibly prevent RAO.MethodsThe authors designed a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 2-by-2 factorial, placebo-controlled trial encompassing patients undergoing the TRA. Patients were randomized to either 500 μg nitroglycerin or placebo; each arm was also subrandomized to early (upon sheath insertion) or late (right before sheath removal) nitroglycerin administration to evaluate the superiority of nitroglycerin in the prevention of RAO with 24 hours on Doppler ultrasound.ResultsA total of 2,040 patients were enrolled. RAO occurred in 49 patients (2.4%). Fifteen of these patients (30.6%) showed re-establishment of flow at 30 days. Nitroglycerin, compared with placebo, did not reduce the risk for RAO at either of the 2 time points (early, 2.5% vs 2.3% [P = 0.66]; late, 2.3% vs 2.5% [P = 0.66]). By multivariable analysis, the presence of spasm (OR: 3.53; 95% CI: 1.87-6.65; P < 0.001) and access achieved with more than 1 puncture attempt (OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.43-4.66; P = 0.002) were independent predictors of RAO.ConclusionsThe routine use of nitroglycerin was not associated with a reduction in the rate of RAO, regardless of the time of administration (at the beginning or end of the TRA procedure).     

Cost Effectiveness of Mailed Outreach Programs for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Analysis of a Pragmatic,Randomized Trial

1. Download : Download high-res image (284KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image