共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
Holly Lee Peter Duggan Ahsan Chaudhry Paola Neri Jason Tay Fariborz Rashid-Kolvear Nizar J. Bahlis Victor H. Jimenez-Zepeda 《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2018,18(1):e69-e75
Introduction
Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous disease with diverse clinical courses and patient outcomes. Although the introduction of novel agents has improved the overall survival (OS) of multiple myeloma patients, reports have highlighted that a subset of patients persists who experience early relapse (ER) and whose prognosis is significantly poorer than that of patients with a longer therapy response.Methods
The purpose of the present study was to understand the effect of ER on OS and identify other predictors of OS. We analyzed the outcomes of 257 patients who had undergone novel agent-based induction and single autologous stem cell therapy at our center from 2010 to 2016.Results
ER occurred in 35 patients (13.6%), and the group had a greater percentage of high-risk cytogenetics (48.5% vs. 23.3%; P = .0001), a lower percentage of a very good partial response or better (51.4% vs. 80.5%; P = .001), and a shorter median OS (17.8 months vs. not realized; P = .0001) compared with the non-ER group. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of ER, high-risk cytogenetics, and lactate dehydrogenase > 350 UI/L are independent prognosticators for OS (P < .05).Conclusions
Our results have demonstrated that ER is an important clinical indicator of patients at high risk. As applications of novel agents evolve, further studies are required to tailor therapy for this patient group. 相似文献2.
3.
《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2022,22(8):626-634
BackgroundRenal impairment (RI) confers a poor prognosis in multiple myeloma. Reversibility of renal function is associated with improved survival in such patients. Patients in developing countries often present at an advanced stage and renal impairment is present in up to 40% of patients at diagnosis. We studied the renal outcome and survival of these patients with bortezomib-based induction therapy.Materials and MethodsIt was a single-center prospective study in a tertiary care multi-specialty institute in patients of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who presented with RI from July 2018 to December 2019. The diagnosis of multiple myeloma was made based on IMWG14 criteria. All patients received bortezomib and or immunomodulatory drug-based triplet or quadruplet induction therapy. Hematological and renal outcomes were assessed as per IMWG 2016 criteria.ResultsAmong 216 consecutive patients of NDMM, RI was seen in 91 (42.2%) patients. The median age of 91 patients was 60 years. (range- 32-80 years). Light chain myeloma was seen in 26% (n = 24) of patients. The median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 15.36 mL/min (3.1-38 mL/min) and a majority of patients were in the advanced ISS stage. (ISS III = 85.7%). Thirty-six (39.5%) patients received hemodialysis at presentation. Renal response was seen in 67 (73%) patients and 20 (out of 36; 55%) became dialysis independent over a median time of 38 days (Range 15-160 days). At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, 30 (33%) patients had died, of which, 14 (15.4%) patients had early mortality (within 2 months of diagnosis). Presence of light chain myeloma and cast nephropathy (definite or probable) were identified as independent predictors of poor renal recovery on multivariate analysis. (HR = 2.841; 95% CI [1.471-5.486], P = .002 for light chain myeloma; HR = 1.859; 95% CI (1.087-3.180); P = .024 for cast nephropathy) Patients with low eGFR at presentation (<12.5 mL/min) were more likely to have persistent renal insufficiency. (HR-3.521; 95% CI (1.856-6.679), P = .000). Patients who attained sustained renal recovery had improved survival as compared to patients in whom renal function failed to improve. (median OS- not reached vs. 8.3 months, P = .000) Achievement of hematological response and independence from hemodialysis was associated with improved survival on multivariate analysis.ConclusionRenal impairment was reversible in almost three-fourths of NDMM patients. achievement of hematological response and hemodialysis independence were independent predictors of improved overall survival in NDMM patients with RI. 相似文献
4.
《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2014,14(5):389-394
IntroductionBortezomib-based therapy is commonly used in treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Unfortunately, many patients show relapse or progression in heterogeneous patterns.Patients and MethodsIn this study, we retrospectively evaluated patterns of relapse or progression after bortezomib-based salvage therapy in patients with MM and analyzed prognostic significance according to patterns of relapse or progression. One hundred forty-eight patients were treated with bortezomib-based therapy between November 2004 and April 2012. Of these patients, 104 (70.3%) patients relapsed or progressed after bortezomib-based salvage therapy. We divided the patterns of relapse or progression to the 2 groups: (1) the isoform relapse or progression (group A) in 89 (85.6%) patients as disease findings at initiation of bortezomib-based therapy; and (2) transformed relapse or progression (group B) in 15 (14.4%) patients (plasmacytoma, n = 7; light chain escape, n = 6; and plasma cell leukemia, n = 2) different from initial disease findings.ResultsMedian overall survival in group A and group B were 32.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.3-44.1) and 10.7 months (95% CI, 2.0-19.4) (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionMM patients who relapsed or progressed as the transformed pattern for bortezomib-based salvage therapy have an extremely poor prognosis and might require new innovative approaches. 相似文献
5.
《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2021,21(10):686-693
BackgroundThe Collaboration to Collect Autologous Transplant Outcomes in Lymphoma and Myeloma (CALM) study has provided an opportunity to evaluate the real-world outcomes of patients with myeloma. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome according to the different subtypes of myeloma using CALM data.PatientsThis study compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complete remission (CR) and the impact of novel versus non-novel drug containing induction regimens prior to autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) of 2802 patients with “usual” and “rare” myelomas.ResultsOur data suggest that IgM and non-secretory myeloma have superior PFS and OS compared with IgD myeloma and outcomes comparable to those for usual myeloma. Patients who received novel agent induction had higher rates of CR prior to transplant. Non-novel induction regimens were associated with inferior PFS but no difference in OS. Although not the primary focus of this study, we show that poor mobilization status is associated with reduced PFS and OS, but these differences disappear in multivariate analysis suggesting that poor mobilization status is a surrogate for other indicators of poor prognosis.ConclusionWe confirm that IgD myeloma is associated with the worst prognosis and inferior outcomes compared with the other isotypes. 相似文献
6.
Roberto Mina Maria Teresa Petrucci Paolo Corradini Stefano Spada Francesca Patriarca Chiara Cerrato Lorenzo De Paoli Norbert Pescosta Roberto Ria Alessandra Malfitano Pellegrino Musto Luca Baldini Tommasina Guglielmelli Barbara Gamberi Donato Mannina Giulia Benevolo Renato Zambello Antonietta Pia Falcone Sara Bringhen 《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2018,18(8):533-540
Background
High-dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) and maintenance treatment with novel agents are the best options for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, increasing the rate of complete response (CR) and prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Indeed, the achievement of a CR is a predictor of long-term survival among transplant-eligible patients. However, it is unclear whether patients reaching a CR after induction treatment could receive less intense consolidation or avoid maintenance therapy.Patients and Methods
We analyzed CR patients treated in 2 phase III trials, GIMEMA-RV-MM-PI-209 and RV-MM-EMN-441, to compare HDT-ASCT with an R-Alk (lenalidomide, alkylator) regimen as consolidation, and lenalidomide (R) maintenance with no maintenance. The primary endpoints were PFS, second PFS (PFS2), and OS from consolidation and maintenance (_m).Results
Overall, the data from 166 patients in CR were analyzed, 95 in the HDT-ASCT group and 71 in the R-Alk group. The CR patients who received HDT-ASCT had a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; P = .01), PFS2 (HR, 0.46; P = .02), and OS (HR, 0.42; P = .03) compared with patients randomized to R-Alk. The survival benefit with HDT-ASCT was confirmed among all the subgroups, according to age, International Staging System (ISS stage, cytogenetic profile, and receipt of maintenance therapy. CR patients who received lenalidomide maintenance had a better PFS_m (4 years: 54% vs. 19%; HR, 0.43; P = .02) compared with those who received no maintenance. However, no difference was observed in terms of PFS2_m (4 years: 72% vs. 58%; HR, 0.83; P = .67) and OS_m (4 years: 79% vs. 72%; HR, 0.82; P = .73) with maintenance therapy.Conclusion
Even in CR patients, outcomes were improved by an intensified approach with HDT-ASCT consolidation and lenalidomide-based maintenance therapy. 相似文献7.
《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2022,22(8):608-617
BackgroundConsiderable progress has been made in therapeutic options for multiple myeloma (MM). Understanding the current landscape of MM treatment options and associated outcomes in the real world is important in providing key insights into clinical and knowledge gaps which could be targeted for further optimization.MethodsThe Canadian Myeloma Research Group Database (CMRG-DB) is a prospectively maintained disease-specific database with >7000 patients. The objective of this study was to describe the trends in the treatment landscape and outcomes including early mortality, time to next treatment, and overall survival (OS) in each line of treatment stratified by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) receipt among newly-diagnosed MM patients in Canada between 2007 and 2018.ResultsA total of 5154 patients were identified among which 3030 patients (58.8%) received an upfront ASCT and 2124 (41.2%) did not. At diagnosis, the median age was 64 years and 58.6% were males. Bortezomib and lenalidomide were most frequently used (>50%) in first and second-line treatment respectively among both the ASCT and non-ASCT cohort. The median OS was 122.0 months (95% Cl 115.0-135.0 months) and 54.3 months (95% CI 50.8-58.8 months) for the ASCT and non-ASCT cohort respectively with an incremental decrease in OS in each subsequent line of treatment.ConclusionWe present the largest study to date in the Canadian landscape showing the characteristics, therapy usage, and outcomes among MM patients. This information will be critical in benchmarking current outcomes and provide key insight into areas of unmet needs and gaps for improvement of MM patients nationally. 相似文献
8.
《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2020,20(10):704-711
IntroductionSocioeconomic status (SES) has been shown to be a prognostic factor for overall survival in a variety of hematologic malignancies, especially for patients who require continuous care such as those with multiple myeloma (MM).Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from 223 patients with symptomatic MM diagnosed and treated in our department from January 2005 to December 2019. The modified Kuppuswamy scale, slightly modified, was used for the SES assessment. The Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival and Cox regression analysis were used.ResultsIn our cohort of 223 patients with MM, low SES was an independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival (OS), in addition to higher International Staging System stage and high-risk cytogenetics (hazard ratio for low SES on Cox regression analysis, 2.092; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-3.2; log-rank P = .000). Patients with low SES had inferior survival compared with the whole patient cohort (median OS: low SES, 28 months; 95% CI, 18-37.9; high SES, 68 months; 95% CI, 55.6-80.4; log-rank P = .000). The low SES effect on OS was more evident for the elderly patients who were not transplant eligible and in those with a diagnosis of MM International Staging System stage I. The effect of low SES on OS was attenuated by time, and ethnic origin had no effect on OS.ConclusionsThe results of the present study have shown that low SES is an independent poor prognostic factor for survival of patients with MM. 相似文献
9.
《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2020,20(2):130-135.e1
BackgroundHigh-dose melphalan (MEL) is the standard conditioning regimen used for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Generic MEL is routinely used in various transplant centers across the world including ours due to its reduced cost and ease of availability. We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK) and the clinical efficacy of generic MEL with that of the innovator formulation in MM patients undergoing ASCT.Patients and MethodsSixty-three patients diagnosed with MM receiving high-dose MEL were included in this study. MEL levels in plasma were measured using a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS-MS) protocol and non-linear mixed effects modeling was used to evaluate the PK of the data.ResultsThe interindividual variability (IIV) in MEL area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) and clearance (CL) were 4.39, 5.88-fold for generic, and 4.34, 6.85-fold for the innovator formulation, respectively. The median MEL AUC and CL were comparable between the 2 formulations. The population PK analysis showed age and creatinine CL as the only significant covariates explaining IIV in MEL AUC/CL. Analysis of MEL PK parameters with clinical outcome showed no significant differences in terms of onset and severity of mucositis, day to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, as well as response status on day 100 post ASCT between patients receiving generic or innovator formulations of MEL. In addition, neither MEL AUC nor CL was found to be associated with day +100 response.ConclusionOur study suggests that the PK and efficacy of the generic MEL is comparable to the innovator formulation. 相似文献
10.
Yoshimasa Miyagawa Kazuhiro Araki Ayako Bun Hiromi Ozawa Yukie Fujimoto Tomoko Higuchi Arisa Nishimukai Ayako Kira Michiko Imamura Yuichi Takatsuka Yasuo Miyoshi 《Clinical breast cancer》2018,18(5):400-409
Introduction
Although eribulin and nab-paclitaxel are chemotherapy agents widely used for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC), their predictive factors remain unknown. Because the absolute neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a significant prognostic factor for early-stage breast cancer, we investigated its usefulness in terms of the eribulin or nab-paclitaxel treatment efficacy for MBC.Patients and Methods
A total of 85 patients with MBC treated with eribulin (n = 59) or nab-paclitaxel (n = 26) were recruited. NLR values were collected at baseline, after 1 cycle, after 2 cycles, and at the end of treatment. The NLR cutoff value was set at 3.Results
The progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with an NLR < 3 at baseline (median, 242 days; n = 24) was significantly better than that of patients with an NLR of ≥ 3 (median, 98 days; n = 35; hazard ratio, 0.37, 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.71; P = .0032). Similarly, the overall survival was marginally significantly better in patients with an NLR < 3 who were treated with eribulin (P = .058). However, the NLR was not significantly associated with PFS or overall survival for patients treated with nab-paclitaxel. No significant association was found between the NLR during treatment and PFS in the eribulin group. The significance of the NLR for the efficacy of eribulin was consistent, irrespective of estrogen receptor status, previous anthracycline or endocrine use, and the number of previous chemotherapy regimens.Conclusion
A low NLR at baseline was significantly associated with improved PFS in patients treated with eribulin but not in those treated with nab-paclitaxel. Therefore, the baseline NLR might be clinically useful for selecting patients who would benefit from eribulin. 相似文献11.
Parameswaran Hari Dorothy Romanus Antonio Palumbo Katarina Luptakova Robert M. Rifkin Linh Mai Tran Aditya Raju Eileen Farrelly Stephen J. Noga Marlo Blazer Ajai Chari 《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2018,18(2):152-160
Background
In clinical trials, an extended therapy duration has been associated with better outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). However, data on how the therapy duration affects the outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are limited. We conducted a large, retrospective study in the United States to evaluate the effect of the duration of second-line therapy on overall survival.Patients and Methods
Adults with NDMM from January 2008 to June 2015 were followed up to identify their second-line therapy. The duration of therapy (DOT) and time to next therapy (TTNT), as a proxy for progression-free survival, were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The relationship between the duration of second-line therapy and overall survival was evaluated with a logistic marginal structural model to mitigate the risk of treatment selection and survival bias.Results
A total of 628 NDMM patients developed a relapse after initial therapy. The median DOT for second-line therapy was 6.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-7.7 months), which was shorter than the corresponding TTNT (median, 15.1 months; 95% CI, 13.4-17.3 months). Each additional month of second-line therapy was associated with a reduced adjusted risk of death at 1 year (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77-0.83; P < .001).Conclusion
In a large database capturing a heterogeneous patient population and varied treatment patterns reflecting routine clinical care, we found a clinical benefit for continued longer DOT at first relapse. Despite the emerging paradigm favoring continuous therapy, second-line progression-free survival (utilizing TTNT as the proxy) was more than twofold longer than the DOT. Understanding the barriers to extended DOT could help to improve the outcomes for RRMM patients. 相似文献12.
Avraham Travers Azim Jalali Stephen Begbie Christine Semira Suzanne Kosmider Sumitra Ananda Rachel Wong Margaret Lee Jeremy Shapiro Matthew Burge Desmond Yip Javier Torres Brigette Ma Louise Nott Andrew Dean Jeanne Tie Adnan Khattak Stephanie Lim Peter Gibbs 《Clinical colorectal cancer》2021,20(1):e21-e34
13.
Metformin Use Is Associated With Better Survival of Breast Cancer Patients With Diabetes: A Meta‐Analysis 下载免费PDF全文
Xiaoyan Jia Yali Tian Yun Dai Dapeng Li Jing Xie Min Tao Yixiang Mao 《The oncologist》2015,20(11):1236-1244
Background.
Diabetic patients with breast cancer receiving metformin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher pathologic complete response rate than do diabetic patients not receiving metformin, but findings on salvage treatment have been inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the effect of adding metformin to standard therapy on the prognosis of breast cancer patients with diabetes.Methods.
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science (Thomson Scientific), China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, VIP journal integration platform, and Chinese BioMedical Literature Database from inception to January 10, 2015, without language restrictions, including references related to metformin, breast cancer, and prognosis. We performed the meta-analysis using a random-effects model, with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) as effect measures.Results.
A total of 11 studies consisting of 5,464 breast cancer patients with diabetes were included, comprising 2,760 patients who had received metformin and 2,704 patients who had not. The meta-analysis showed that metformin was associated with better overall survival times (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39-0.71) and cancer-specific survival times (HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-1.00). Subgroup analysis revealed that metformin improved the overall survival by 65% after adjusting for hormone receptor expression (HR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.15–0.84). Taking metformin after the diagnosis of breast cancer was still associated with prolonged overall survival.Conclusion.
The use of metformin in standard cancer therapy might improve both overall and cancer-specific survivals of diabetic patients with breast cancer.Implications for Practice:
Diabetic patients with breast cancer receiving metformin and neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a higher pathologic complete response rate than diabetic patients not receiving metformin, but findings on salvage treatment have been inconsistent. The meta-analysis showed that metformin was associated with better overall survival times and cancer-specific survival times. Subgroup analysis revealed that metformin improved the overall survival by 65% after adjusting for hormone receptor expression. Taking metformin after the diagnosis of breast cancer was still associated with prolonged overall survival. The findings of this study highlight the potential usage of metformin in diabetic patients with breast cancer. 相似文献14.
Nina Ommundsen Torgeir B. Wyller Arild Nesbakken Marit S. Jordhøy Arne Bakka Eva Skovlund Siri Rostoft 《The oncologist》2014,19(12):1268-1275
Background.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is prevalent in the older population. Geriatric assessment (GA) has previously been found to predict treatment tolerance and postoperative complications in older cancer patients. The aim of this study was to explore whether GA also predicts 1-year and 5-year survival after CRC surgery in older patients and to compare the predictive power of GA with that of established prognostic factors such as TNM classification of malignant tumors (TNM) stage and age.Materials and Methods.
A cohort of 178 CRC patients aged 70 and older were followed prospectively. All patients went through elective surgery, and GA was performed presurgery. The GA resulted in patients being divided into two groups: frail or nonfrail. All patients were followed for 5 years or until death. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots and the Cox proportional hazards model.Results.
Seventy-six patients (43%) were frail, and one hundred and two (57%) were nonfrail. Twenty-three patients (13%) died during the first year after surgery. One-year survival was 80% in the frail group and 92% in the nonfrail group. Five-year survival was significantly lower in frail (24%) than nonfrail patients (66%), and this difference was apparent both within the stratums of TNM stages 0–II and TNM stage III. In multivariable analysis adjusting for TNM stage, age, and sex, frailty was an independent prognostic factor for survival.Conclusion.
A GA-based frailty assessment predicts 1-year and 5-year survival in older patients after surgery for CRC. In localized and regional disease, the impact of frailty upon 5-year survival is comparable with that of TNM stage. 相似文献15.
《Journal of thoracic oncology》2023,18(2):181-193
IntroductionThe phase 3 PACIFIC trial established consolidation therapy with durvalumab as standard of care for patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC and no disease progression after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). The observational PACIFIC-R study assesses the real-world effectiveness of durvalumab in patients from an early access program. Here, we report treatment characteristics and a preplanned analysis of real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS).MethodsPACIFIC-R (NCT03798535) is an ongoing, international, retrospective study of patients who started durvalumab (intravenously; 10 mg/kg every 2 wk) within an early access program between September 2017 and December 2018. The primary end points are investigator-assessed rwPFS and overall survival (analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method).ResultsAs of November 30, 2020, the full analysis set comprised 1399 patients from 11 countries (median follow-up duration, 23.5 mo). Patients received durvalumab for a median of 11.0 months. Median rwPFS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval: 19.1–24.5). RwPFS was numerically longer among patients who received concurrent versus sequential CRT (median, 23.7 versus 19.3 mo) and among patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression greater than or equal to 1% versus less than 1% (22.4 versus 15.6 mo). Overall, 16.5% of the patients had adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation; 9.5% of all patients discontinued because of pneumonitis or interstitial lung disease.ConclusionsConsolidation durvalumab after definitive CRT was well tolerated and effective in this large, real-world cohort study of patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC. As expected, rwPFS was longer among patients who received concurrent versus sequential CRT and patients with higher programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression. Nevertheless, favorable rwPFS outcomes were observed regardless of these factors. 相似文献
16.
Nina Shah Donna M. Weber Michael Wang Sheeba Thomas Jatin Shah Sergio Giralt Raymond Alexanian Robert Z. Orlowski Muzaffar H. Qazilbash Tiffany Avery 《Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia》2010,10(3):E31
BackgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies diagnosed annually in the United States. It is well documented that the African American population is disproportionately affected by MM in incidence and mortality. Survival data from the SEER database from 2001-2005 demonstrated higher mortality in African American patients compared to Caucasian patients. However, more recent retrospective reviews in the era of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) did not support this finding. Thus the persistence of racial survival disparities in the era of ASCT and novel therapeutic agents is an evolving question.Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 170 African American MM patients and 170 age-matched and gender-matched Caucasian patients initially seen at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1/1/2002 to 12/31/2008.ResultsThree hundred forty previously untreated patients were analyzed. Median age at diagnosis was 57 years for both groups. For evaluable patients, the International Staging System at diagnosis was determined. The percentage of stage I, II, and III patients in the African American group was 53%, 28%, and 19%, respectively. The percentage of stage I, II, and III patients in the Caucasian group was 40%, 30%, and 29%, respectively. These staging data were not significantly different between racial groups. In both groups, 89% of patients received a novel therapeutic agent (thalidomide, lenalidomide, or bortezomib) during their treatment course. We found a statistically significant difference in the percentage of African American and Caucasian patients who received high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT (65% and 76%, respectively; P = .04). There was no difference observed in the number of second transplantations performed in the two groups (19 in both groups). Response to therapy is detailed in Table 1. There was no difference in overall response to any therapy of evaluable patients between the two groups. With a median follow-up time of 35 months, the median overall survival from diagnosis has not been reached in either group. Kaplan-Meir analysis shows that there is no difference in overall survival between African American and Caucasian patients (P = .1)ConclusionIn this single-center, retrospective study of MM patients treated predominately with novel agents, with or without ASCT, no survival difference was observed between African American and Caucasian patients. To our knowledge, this is the largest number of African American myeloma patients analyzed for survival in a single-center study. Recognizing the potential disparities in healthcare access, this may not represent outcomes for all African American patients with myeloma. Since median overall survival has not been reached in this data, it is possible that survival differences will become apparent in the future, and further follow-up is needed. However, this review suggests that in the era of novel therapeutics and ASCT resulting in improved overall response rates, survival in African American patients may be equivalent to Caucasian patients. Further efforts are needed to enroll African American patients on clinical trials to validate this observation prospectively. Abstract 6 - Table 1. Best Response to Any Therapy
Race | CR | VGPR | PR | ORR |
---|---|---|---|---|
African American | 56/154 (36%) | 15/154 (10%) | 76/154 (49%) | 147/154 (95%) |
Caucasian | 57/162 (35%) | 32/162 (20%) | 64/162 (40%) | 153/162 (94%) |