保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造

目的　介绍保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造的经验。方法　对早期乳腺癌 ,保留乳房皮肤 ,切除乳腺组织和腋窝淋巴结 ,应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣或扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣即时乳房再造。结果　应用该方法治疗 37例 ,再造乳房形态良好。结论　保留皮肤乳腺癌根治术后即时乳房再造 ,切口隐蔽 ,再造乳房形态效果好 ,对早期乳腺癌患者值得推广应用     

保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造

目的介绍保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造的经验.方法对早期乳腺癌,保留乳房皮肤,切除乳腺组织和腋窝淋巴结,应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣或扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣即时乳房再造.结果应用该方法治疗37例,再造乳房形态良好.结论保留皮肤乳腺癌根治术后即时乳房再造,切口隐蔽,再造乳房形态效果好,对早期乳腺癌患者值得推广应用.     

保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造

目的；介绍保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造的经验。方法；对早期乳腺癌，保留乳房皮肤，切除乳腺组织和腋窝淋巴结，应用下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣或扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣即时乳房再造。结果：应用该方法治疗37例，再造乳房形态良好。结论：保留皮肤乳腺癌根治术后即时乳房再造，即口隐蔽，再造乳房形态效果好，对早期乳腺癌患者值得推广应用。     

10例保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时TRAM皮瓣乳房再造体会

目的 总结保留皮肤乳腺癌改良根治术后即时乳房再造方法的治疗体会.方法 笔者所在医院2008年5月至2011年12月期间对10例早期乳腺癌患者行保留大部分皮肤的改良根治术,同时应用下腹部腹直肌带蒂肌皮瓣(TRAM)行即时乳房再造,就该10例患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析.结果 10例患者中1例TRAM皮瓣部分坏死,1例乳头部分坏死,1例再造乳房乳尾部脂肪部分坏死伴腋下伤口感染;无腹壁切口疝发生,无全部TRAM皮瓣坏死病例.术后患者对再造乳房形态评价非常满意5例,比较满意4例,不满意1例.结论 保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后即时TRAM皮瓣乳房再造方法的切口小,再造乳房形态好,是一种安全有效的治疗早期乳腺癌患者的方法.     

保留皮肤的乳癌改良根治术后即时背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造

目的介绍保留皮肤的乳癌改良根治术后即时背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造的经验。方法对Ⅰ,Ⅱ期乳腺癌行保留乳房皮肤经皮下切除乳腺组织,清扫腋窝淋巴结,应用背阔肌肌皮瓣即时乳房再造。结果应用该方法治疗3 7例,经随访7 5个月,再造乳房自然柔软,外观形态良好,满意率94.6%。结论保留皮肤的乳腺癌根治术后即时背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造具有操作方便,治疗效果良好,患者满意度高,是值得推广的好方法。     

扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造

目的 介绍单纯应用扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣进行乳房再造方法.方法 将背阔肌周围脂肪组织分为5个区,切取背阔肌及周围脂肪组织,不应用乳房假体,进行即时或后期乳房再造.结果 应用该方法再造乳房95例,其中保留乳头乳晕改良根治术后即时再造24例,保留皮肤改良根治术后即时再造36例,改良根治术后即时再造26例,后期再造9例,其中1例为改良根治术后,其他8例为改良根治术后,再造乳房均形态良好.术后6例乳头部分坏死;14例胸部皮肤表皮脱落,自行愈合;2例背部供区部分坏死;背部顽固性血清肿2例,再次手术后愈合.结论 扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造安全有效,再造乳房形态良好,尤其适用于中、小乳房的乳房再造.     

保留乳头乳晕复合体乳癌术后即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣乳房再造

目的:探讨保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳腺癌改良根治术后行即时以扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣行乳房再造的安全性和手术技巧。方法:28例早期乳腺癌患者行保留乳头乳晕复合体乳腺癌改良根治术,术后即刻使用扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣再造乳房。术中改进:注意保护乳房皮肤的感觉神经、保留胸背神经及二级分支,采取皮瓣翻转法乳房塑型,行腋窝填塞和腋前皱襞的重建以及切取皮瓣的组织量大于切除的20%～50%腺体量等。结果:28例即时乳房再造全部获得成功。随访12～36个月,均生存,无局部复发,其中1例术后10个月骨转移,1例2年后肺转移;美学效果:优18例,良6例,一般2例,差2例;再造乳房皮肤的感觉、乳头的竖起功能存在,自然下垂,外形对称,腋窝饱满,患侧肢体运动范围较常规改良根治术明显增大。结论:对于选择合适的病例,保留乳头乳晕复合体的乳腺癌改良根治术后应用即时扩展型背阔肌肌皮瓣再造术安全、有效,术中几点合理的技术改进可以明显提高再造乳房的质量和自然度。     

乳腺癌改良根治术与乳房即时再造

目的探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后乳房缺损的解决方法. 方法总结17例乳腺癌术后乳房自体组织移植、保留乳头和不保留乳头的人工假体填充乳房即时再造的经验,介绍病例选择、皮瓣设计和手术方法. 结果应用下腹部横形腹直肌肌皮瓣(transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous,TRAM)进行即时乳房再造4例,盐水-硅凝胶乳房假体进行即时乳房再造13例,其中4例为保留乳头的乳房再造,效果满意. 结论Ⅰ、Ⅱ期乳腺癌在改良根治术的同时行乳房再造是安全可靠的,可减少皮下积液和上肢水肿的发生率.TRAM可同时进行腹部整形,假体的植入简便易行.     

67例保留皮肤的乳腺癌根治术单囊假体植入即刻再造

目的回顾性总结保留皮肤的乳腺癌根治术后即时应用单囊假体植入再造乳房的经验。探讨手术适应证、方法和效果的改进。方法67例患者先行保留皮肤的乳腺癌根治术,然后同时植入单囊假体再造乳房。结果所有患者随访48个月。2例出现轻微并发症即1例皮瓣局部坏死,1例保留乳头乳晕部分坏死。优良率达97%。结论乳腺癌根治术后单囊假体植入适用于健侧乳房较小的患者,手术操作简单,假体植入近期效果好,可基本满足患者日常需要。     

����Ƥ�������ٰ������������󼴿̼���ֲ�������鷿��̽��

目的用安全、简便的方法解决乳腺癌根治术后乳房缺损问题。方法2002年4月至2004年9月,在行保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后同期于胸大肌后植入Meter或Beck假体,即时再造乳房。根治术时根据冰冻结果决定是否保留乳头乳晕复合体。结果32例病人中,23例行Meter单囊假体植入,9例行Beck双囊可扩张假体植入,5例保留乳头乳晕复合体,均获得满意效果。32例病人中经病理证实15例为浸润性导管癌,11例为浸润性小叶癌,4例为浸润性导管癌同时合并浸润性小叶癌,1例为乳管内乳头状瘤病伴部分癌变,1例为浸润性小叶癌保乳术后复发。结论保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术后运用假体植入法行Ⅰ期乳房再造,创伤小、安全、快速,恢复期短,手术操作简单易行,即时效果满意。     

Immediate breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap after skin-sparing mastectomy

Immediate breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap after skin-sparing mastectomy is becoming an increasingly performed procedure in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, early invasive breast cancer, and prophylactic mastectomy. Through a periareolar approach, it is possible to remove the breast parenchyma along with the nipple areola complex, preserving almost all the original skin envelope and the inframmamary fold. The TRAM flap is used to recreate the volume and shape of the original breast. This technique has higher quality and easier reconstruction. The major disadvantages, extensive scar and donor site skin color mismatch, are reduced to a minimum level because the former is limited at the natural border of the nipple areola and the latter can be effectively concealed with proper nipple reconstruction. Thirty-one patients with a mean age of 39 years (range, 26-50 years) who had undergone unilateral or bilateral mastectomy for early breast cancer and immediate breast reconstruction with the pedicled TRAM flap were retrospectively reviewed. Requirements for the skin-sparing mastectomy technique include suitability of donor site tissue for autologous tissue, early breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, and adequate size and shape matching of the contralateral breast. There was no observed local recur- rence during the follow-up period (mean, 20 months; range, 11-30 months). Complications at the recipient site include mastectomy skin flap partial necrosis in 2 patients and cellulitis of the transferred flap in 1 patient. No total or partial flap necrosis was observed. One patient developed abdominal bulging 1 month after the operation, during the administration of chemotherapy. All reconstruction was considered very satisfactory from an aesthetic perspective by the surgeon and the patient. The nicer aesthetic result with oncological safety is achieved with immediate breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap after skin-sparing mastectomy. The risk of local recurrence is not higher compared with more radical surgical techniques.     

Is mammography useful in screening for local recurrences in patients with TRAM flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy for multifocal DCIS?

Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstruction is being used more often for the treatment of breast cancer. Mammography is not used routinely to evaluate TRAM flaps in women who have undergone mastectomy. We have identified the potential value of its use in selected patients. Methods and Results: We report on four women who manifested local recurrences in TRAM flaps after initial treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with microinvasion undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. All four patients presented with extensive, high-grade, multifocal DCIS that precluded breast conservation. Three of four mastectomy specimens demonstrated tumor close to the surgical margin. Three of the four recurrences were detected by physical examination; the remaining local recurrence was documented by screening mammography. The recurrences had features suggestive of malignancy on mammography. Conclusion: We conclude that all patients undergoing mastectomy and TRAM reconstruction for extensive, multifocal DCIS should undergo regular routine mammography of the reconstructed breast. Our experience with this subgroup of patients raises concern about the value of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction for therapy. Adjuvant radiation therapy should be recommended for those patients with negative but close surgical margins.     

乳房皮下切除与自体组织即刻乳房再造

目的探索乳房皮下切除与几种方法的乳房再造术，即腹直肌肌皮瓣或背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体或局部皮瓣等即刻再造乳房的方法。方法选择乳腺导管内原位癌10例和巨大乳腺良性肿瘤5例，顺乳晕切口活检，病理检查确立诊断后，采用经乳腺切口行乳癌或巨大肿瘤的乳房皮下切除术，若乳癌或良性肿瘤体积较大，另于腋窝部加做顺腋下皱襞的附加切口，以便于取出切除的组织及切除乳腺的腋尾部，同时可以切取腋淋巴结行冰冻切片活检。然后，应用腹直肌肌皮瓣或背阔肌肌皮瓣加乳房假体或局部皮瓣即刻行再造乳房，充填乳房切除后的空间，仅以少量的肌皮瓣皮肤修复乳头、乳晕切除后的缺损，并在此转移皮瓣上再造乳头、乳晕。结果经过多专科协作共完成15例，随访结果良好，无肿瘤复发。此法再造的乳房易与健侧乳房对称，保留了原有乳房皮肤的良好感觉，外观形态自然，再造乳房瘢痕较少，且手术切口瘢痕隐蔽。结论在严格选择手术适应证防止乳腺癌复发的前提下，乳房皮下切除与即刻乳房再造法，对乳腺导管内原位癌和巨大乳腺良性肿瘤患者I期完成肿瘤切除和乳房再造术，具有积极有效的意义。     

几种乳房再造术的临床应用体会

目的：探讨乳腺癌根治术后应用单纯假体植入、可扩张假体植入和带蒂腹部横形腹直肌肌皮瓣（TRAM）移植乳房再造的适应证、手术方法、手术效果。方法：本组共24例病例。14例乳腺癌患者行保留皮肤的乳腺癌根治术，Ⅰ期行假体植入乳房再造；6例采用改良乳腺癌根治可扩张假体植入Ⅰ期乳房再造；4例接受单蒂下腹部横形腹直肌肌皮瓣（TRAM）移植乳房再造手术，其中2例为Ⅰ期再造，另2例为Ⅱ期乳房再造。结果：手术效果较满意，2例出现轻微并发症，其中1例皮瓣局灶坏死，另1例出现乳头乳晕部分坏死。结论：单纯假体植入适用于乳房小，没有明显下垂的瘦小病人。优点是不增加额外瘢痕，术后恢复快；可扩张假体植入乳房再造适用于乳房大或改良乳腺癌根治术的患者，此法结合了单纯假体植入法和组织扩张的优点：TRAM皮瓣移植乳房再造的优点是自体组织移植，安全、手术效果好。     

Skin-sparing mastectomy in the UK--a review of current practice

BACKGROUND: Skin-sparing mastectomy (was first described in 1991 and has achieved popularity because it facilitates immediate breast reconstruction, preserving the infra-mammary fold and breast envelope. Little is known about the use of skin-sparing mastectomy in the UK. METHODS: All members of the BASO Breast Specialty Group were contacted in June 2001 with a questionnaire to determine the popularity of skin-sparing mastectomy, techniques used, indications, contra-indications and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 300 questionnaires sent, 130 were returned by September 2001. The number of respondents using skin-sparing mastectomy increased from 27 (21%) in 1997 to 95 (73%) in 2001. Of respondents, 35 (23%) avoided skin-sparing mastectomy because of their uncertainty about the benefits (22/35), indications (16/35) or oncological safety (13/35). Where skin-sparing mastectomy was performed, it was combined with immediate breast reconstruction in 90% of cases, using latissimus dorsi (84%), subpectoral (70%) or TRAM flap reconstruction (54%). Skin-sparing mastectomy was performed by breast surgeons alone (62%), or with a plastic surgeon (47%) and the preferred incisions were peri-areolar (68%) and elliptical (26%). Most respondents used skin-sparing mastectomy for prophylaxis, in situ cancer and early invasive disease and avoided skin-sparing mastectomy in patients with skin tethering (62%), where radiotherapy was planned (49%) and in smokers (28%). Complications seen by respondents included skin envelope necrosis (68%), haematoma formation (46%), cosmetic failure (41%) and local recurrence (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Skin-sparing mastectomy is becoming popular in the UK, but experience is limited. The variation in indications and techniques indicate the need to establish evidence-based guidelines for the wider practice of skin-sparing mastectomy in the UK.     

The "banked" TRAM: a method to insure mastectomy skin-flap survival

BACKGROUND: Necrosis of the skin flaps after mastectomy can be a devastating complication following immediate breast reconstruction with a TRAM flap. Skin-flap loss compromises the aesthetic result and may necessitate revisional surgery. The authors wish to present a simple and effective method to insure mastectomy skin-flap survival. METHODS: Seven patients over the last 5 years were treated with immediate breast reconstruction with a TRAM flap after skin-sparing mastectomy and had evidence of skin-flap compromise intraoperatively. These patients had their TRAM flaps "banked" under the flaps and returned to the operating room within 72 hours for definitive debridement of the skin flaps, deepithelialization, and insetting of the TRAM. RESULTS: In all cases, there was 100% survival of the skin flaps after delayed insetting. There was no skin-flap loss. No patients required additional surgery for revision. CONCLUSIONS: The banked TRAM is a simple and effective method to insure mastectomy skin flap survival if there is a question of flap viability.     

即刻及延期乳房再造方法的选择

目的回顾总结乳腺癌根治术后应用单纯假体植入、Becker可扩张假体植入和单蒂腹部横形腹直肌肌皮瓣（TRAM）移植、扩大背阔肌肌皮瓣（ELDF）移植乳房再造术的经验,探讨手术的适应证、方法和效果。方法自2002年7月至2005年10月,共67例患者进行了乳腺癌根治术后乳房再造术。即刻乳房再造56例：单纯假体植入38例、Becker可扩张假体植入16例、单蒂TRAM移植2例。延期乳房再造11例：单蒂TRAM移植6例、ELDF移植4例、Becker可扩张假体植入1例。结果手术效果满意,优良率超过90％。5例患者出现轻微并发症：皮瓣局灶性坏死2例,保留的乳头乳晕部分坏死1例,血清肿2例。结论单纯假体植入用于即刻乳房再造,适用于乳房较小、行保留皮肤的乳腺癌根治术后的患者,不宜用于延期乳房再造;可扩张假体植入即刻乳房再造适用于乳房较大或改良乳腺癌根治术的患者,同时可扩张假体植入延期乳房再造可用于皮肤、肌肉保留较好的乳腺癌根治患者;TRAM和ELDF皮瓣移植乳房再造是自体组织移植,其安全性高,可用于即刻和延期乳房再造。     

乳腺癌术后乳房即刻再造152例报告

目的探讨乳癌根治术后即时应用单纯假体植入、可调式双囊假体植入和自体组织移植乳房再造术的适应证及疗效。方法101例在保留皮肤的乳腺癌改良根治术基础上于胸大肌下方植入Mentor假体再造乳房，39例在胸大肌下方植入Becker可调式假体再造乳房，10例用单蒂下腹部横行腹直肌肌皮瓣移植至乳房缺损区再造乳房。2例采用扩大的背阔肌肌皮瓣移植再造乳房。结果随访152例3—65个月，中位时间28个月，2例13个月后肿瘤局部复发，取出假体。术后乳房外观评价优良率达94％。结论单纯假体植入适用于乳房较小的患者，可调式假体植入乳房再造适用于乳房较大，或根治术时皮肤缺损较多的患者。