Pap screening in Austria

In view of the efficacy of the pap-smear, particularly little advantage is taken of this early detection test: only 35% of Austrian women (over 20 years of age) go to at least one gynecological-cytological check-up per year. Previously when low participation in the pap-test program was analysed, mostly socioeconomic and psychosocial factors were taken into consideration, whereas less attention was given to what local preventive and curative services are being offered in this field. Hereby a structural lack of services offered to the target group of older women results in urban areas, because the elderly population primarily takes advantage of curative medical services offered through general practitioners, of whom, however, only 8-27% take smear tests. Regional low participation can also be found in rural areas, due to the lack of preventive behaviour of the rural population regarding prevention. Based on these results, increasing health information through the physician and improving his motivation to take the smear test seem to be a purposeful strategy for increasing participation in the pap-test program.     

2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests

A group of 146 experts representing 29 organizations and professional societies met September 18-19, 2006, in Bethesda, MD, to develop revised evidence-based, consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. Recommendations for managing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) are essentially unchanged. Changes were made for managing these conditions in adolescents for whom cytological follow-up for 2 years was approved. Recommendations for managing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and atypical glandular cells (AGC) also underwent only minor modifications. More emphasis is placed on immediate screen-and-treat approaches for HSIL. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is incorporated into the management of AGC after their initial evaluation with colposcopy and endometrial sampling. The 2004 Interim Guidance for HPV testing as an adjunct to cervical cytology for screening in women 30 years of age and older was formally adopted with only very minor modifications.     

Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate new techniques in primary cervical cancer screening programmes. DESIGN: Cross sectional pilot study. SETTING: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Hospital. POPULATION: Consecutive 2032 human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and Pap smear samples were taken. Histological diagnoses were obtained from 460 patients. METHODS: We compared the validity of the high risk (HR) HPV DNA detection test to automation-assisted and conventional Pap smear screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Specificity and sensitivity of screening methods. RESULTS: Twenty-three percent of women were HPV positive. Forty-five of 46 had high grade lesions and cancers were HR HPV DNA positive, whereas 72/93 of low grade and more severe lesions were HR HPV DNA positive. When histologically verified high grade lesions were observed, the relative sensitivity of HR Hybrid Capture 2 (HR HC2) test was 98% compared with conventional Pap smear and Papnet tests, which performed 54%versus 58%, 83%versus 86% and 93%versus 98% relative sensitivity respectively, using cytological diagnoses HSIL (high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion), LSIL (low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) or ASCUS (atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) as the cutoff. The specificity of HC2 test (77-79%) was comparable with the ASCUS+ (ASCUS and more severe) cytology (68-79%), but lower when compared with LSIL+ (91-95%) or especially HSIL+ (97-99%) Pap smear results. CONCLUSION: Pap smear, as a screening test, is very different from HPV DNA detecting test HR HC 2. If cutoff LSIL or more severe lesions is used, primary Pap smear is clearly more specific than HR HC2, but markedly less sensitive. Due to high relative sensitivity of the HPV, only very few histologically confirmed high grade lesions would be detected among HPV negatives using simultaneous cytology. On the other hand, using HPV DNA test alone would lead to multifold amounts of referrals for colposcopy. A posterior Pap smear assessment among HPV positives might be helpful in increasing sensitivity and specificity of screening and defining those who need an immediate referral or treatment. We plan to incorporate primary HR HPV DNA test with posterior Pap smear reading of HPV positives into our ongoing randomised prospective multiarm trial evaluating new techniques in organised screening for cervical cancer in Finland.     

Controversies in the management of abnormal Pap smears

Cytology is not 100% accurate. Overdiagnoses and underdiagnoses occur. Changes in classification systems and new devices have not changed the reliability of the Pap smear. The majority of squamous intraepithelial lesions will remit spontaneously and less than 1% will progress to invasive cancer. HPV-DNA testing has not provided a foolproof way to triage lesions. Therefore, the management of abnormal Pap smears is dependent on the personal experience of the physician, who must consider the following questions. What is the accuracy of your cytology laboratory? Does it overdiagnose or underdiagnose? How often has an ASCUS or LSIL become HSIL or invasive cancer on histologic evaluation? Will your patients come back for follow up? Will their health insurance cover frequent follow-up Pap smears or colposcopies? Do you have the resources to follow every patient who needs it? Do you want to avoid the development of every invasive cancer that may develop during the period of follow up?     

Triaging Pap cytology negative, HPV positive cervical cancer screening results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology

Objective

Testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been shown to increase the sensitivity and negative predictive value for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+), either when used in conjunction with Pap cytology testing or alone. However, there is no satisfying clinical management algorithm for women testing Pap negative/HPV positive. We therefore evaluated the clinical utility of a novel dual biomarker-based approach (p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology) for the identification of CIN2+ in women with Pap negative/HPV positive screening results, without the need to refer all women to immediate colposcopy.

Methods

All women aged ≥ 30 enrolled during 2007/2008 into a regional prospective Pap/HPV co-testing screening pilot project and tested Pap negative, but positive for HPV (n = 425) were included in the analysis. p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology was performed from residual cellular material available from the liquid-based cytology vial collected during the initial Pap/HPV co-testing screening visit. Results were correlated to the presence of CIN2+ confirmed during preliminary follow-up.

Results

p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology tested positive at baseline in 108 out of 425 (25.4%) Pap negative/HPV positive cases. Sensitivity of Dual-stain testing for the detection of biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ during preliminary follow-up within the group of Pap negative/HPV positive women was 91.9% for CIN2+ (34/37 cases), and 96.4% for CIN3+ (27/28 cases). Specificity was 82.1% for CIN2+ on biopsy, and 76.9% for CIN3+, respectively.

Conclusions

Triaging Pap negative/HPV positive screening test results with p16/Ki-67 Dual-stained cytology may identify women with a high probability of underlying CIN2+ and may efficiently complement HPV-based screening programs to prevent cervical cancer.     

New guidelines for maternal and neonatal resuscitation

New evidence has prompted changes in our national cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines for both neonates and adult patients. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the changes recommended by the American Heart Association, Academy of American Pediatrics, and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. In addition, a strategy for implementing these guidelines into practice is suggested.     

An interactive computer program for teaching residents pap smear classification, screening and management guidelines: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility, utility and resident attitudes towards an interactive, Web-based computer learning program. STUDY DESIGN: Pretest/ posttest evaluation of an interactive curriculum to teach current recommendations for cervical cancer screening and classification and management of abnormal Pap smears. Thirty-five Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/ GYN) residents were encouraged to complete a Web-based computer program that consisted of a pretest, 9 educational sections (3 didactic and 6 case based), a posttest and an exit survey. Clinical cases involved virtual case management of patients' cytologic, histologic and colposcopic images. Mastery was set at 82% (or 23/28 correct answers). RESULTS: Thirty-one of the 35 residents (89%) completed the curriculum. No resident demonstrated mastery (82%) on the pretest; 15 of 31 residents demonstrated mastery on the posttest (p = 0.04). Mean improvement for all residents was 9 additional questions answered correctly. All the residents thought that the Web site was useful and covered all the learning objectives and would recommend it to other residents. CONCLUSION: A program to teach current cervical cancer screening, classification and abnormal Pap smear management guidelines was useful, feasible and well accepted by residents in this population.     

Pap test: liquid-based--thin-layer. A new method: results

OBJECTIVES: Evaluation of the thin-layer technique we have developed. PATIENTS AND METHOD: An adequate shaking, a calibration and a centrifugation in liquid phase are the essential and specific stages of this technique. More than 160 000 samples were prepared according to this methodology in eight years. RESULTS: The immediate profit of the technique is the increase of the number of interpretable samples: 99.9%. First years: net increase of the lesion detection rate in comparison with conventional cervical smear. 1.7 versus 0.9% for the low-grade lesions; 1.0 versus 0.4% for the high-grade lesions. After three years the detection rate of low-grade lesions remained high: 1.7% while the ASCUS/AGUS and high-grade lesions decreased to reach, respectively, 1.1 and 0.4%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The quality of the thin-layer preparation, the best approach of the endocervical pathology, and the possibility to identify rare events, allowed us at first to increase detection of lesions. After three years of "picking up" of lesions forgotten by conventional cervical smear, the rate of high-grade lesions stabilised in 0.4%. Thus, it is advisable to take into account the notion of time as for the estimate of the lesion rate when using thin-layer technique compared with that of conventional cervical smear.     

Improved cervical cancer screening in premenopausal women by combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy

OBJECTIVE: This study was done to evaluate the efficacy of the Pap smear, speculoscopy, and a combination of Pap smear and speculoscopy (PapSure examination) in pre- and postmenopausal women. STUDY DESIGN: All women were screened using the Pap smear and speculoscopy and combination of both (PapSure examination) in the multicenter trial. Final diagnosis of each patient was based on a histological evaluation of the colposcopic target biopsy. Results were analyzed using a proportional comparison test, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value with significance determined at p<0.05. RESULTS: Of 1813 women screened, 1701 were eligible for analysis. Two hundred and fourteen women (12.6%) received at least one positive screening test result. Of the 1084 colposcopic biopsy specimens obtained, 24 showed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and 19 high-grade SIL (HSIL). HSIL were considered test-positive. Rate of colposcopy was 21.5% (125/582) in the premenopausal group and 63.9% (321/502) in the postmenopausal group (p<0.001). For premenopausal women, speculoscopy (75.0%) or PapSure (91.7%) provided higher sensitivity than Pap smear (50%) (p<0.05). In postmenopausal women, no statistical significance in sensitivity existed between PapSure (85.7%) and Pap smear (57.1%). Speculoscopy (96.8%) or PapSure (96.5%) had lower specificity than Pap smear (99.6%) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: PapSure was an accurate alternative screening method to Pap smear or speculoscopy for cervical intraepithelial lesions because of a significantly higher sensitivity along with adequate specificity for premenopausal women; however, PapSure was not a more effective cervical screening method for postmenopausal women.     

Knowledge and general consideration about Pap test screening among women from Finland and Greece

It seems that lack of regular Pap smear screening is a risk factor for cervical cancer. Since women started having Pap smears the number of deaths from cervical cancer has dropped dramatically. The purpose of this study was to investigate the knowledge of women about the essential and basic parameters related to the Pap test in the general population of two European countries: Finland and Greece. The same percentages (> 50%) of women in Athens and Helsinki had good knowledge of the Pap test. Comparing country populations, greater numbers of Finnish women had a better level of Pap test knowledge. Additionally, older women in Finland were more educated and informed about the usage of Pap testing due to the good health service information in this country.