Sulpiride in combination with fluvoxamine increases in vivo dopamine release selectively in rat prefrontal cortex.

Coadministration of atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) enhances the release of monoamines such as dopamine (DA), norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) in the prefrontal cortex. To clarify the role of DA-D2/3 receptors in the combination effect, we examined the effects of coadministration of the selective DA-D2/3 antagonist sulpiride and the SSRI fluvoxamine on amine neurotransmitter release in rat prefrontal cortex. Sulpiride (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and fluvoxamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) alone did not affect extracellular DA levels, while their coadministration caused a significant increase in DA levels. Sulpiride alone did not affect extracellular levels of 5-HT and NE in the prefrontal cortex, while fluvoxamine alone caused a marked increase in 5-HT levels and a slight increase in NE levels. Sulpiride did not affect the fluvoxamine-induced increases in extracellular levels of 5-HT and NE. The DA-D2/3 antagonist haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) in combination with fluvoxamine also caused a selective increase in extracellular DA levels in the cortex. Coadministration of sulpiride and fluvoxamine did not affect extracellular DA levels in the striatum. Combination of systemic sulpiride and local fluvoxamine did not increase the DA levels, but that of systemic fluvoxamine with local sulpiride increased. The combination effect in increasing prefrontal DA levels was antagonized systemically, but not locally, by the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY100635 at a low dose. These findings suggest that the combination of prefrontal DA-D2/3 receptor blockade and 5-HT1A receptor activation in regions other than the cortex plays an important role in sulpiride and fluvoxamine-induced increase in prefrontal DA release.     

Effects of combined administration of 5-HT1A and/or 5-HT1B receptor antagonists and paroxetine or fluoxetine in the forced swimming test in rats

Clinical data suggest that coadministration of pindolol, a 5-HT1A/5-HT1B/beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may shorten the time of onset of a clinical action and may increase beneficial effects of the therapy of drug-resistant depression. Effects of combined administration of SSRIs and 5-HT receptor ligands are currently evaluated in animal models for the detection of an antidepressant-like activity; however, the obtained results turned out to be inconsistent. The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of a 5-HT1A antagonist (WAY 100635), 5-HT1B antagonists (SB 216641 and GR 127935) or pindolol, given in combination with paroxetine or fluoxetine (SSRIs), in the forced swimming test in rats (Porsolt test). When given alone, paroxetine (10 and 20 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 and 20 mg/kg), WAY 100635 (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), SB 216641 (2 mg/kg), GR 127935 (10 and 20 mg/kg) and pindolol (4 and 8 mg/kg) did not shorten the immobility time of rats in that test. Interestingly, SB 216641 administered alone at a dose of 4 mg/kg produced a significant reduction of the immobility time in that test. A combination of paroxetine (20 mg/kg) and WAY 100635 or pindolol failed to reveal a significant interaction; on the other hand, when paroxetine was given jointly with SB 216641 (2 mg/kg) or GR 127935 (10 and 20 mg/kg), that combination showed a significant antiimmobility action in the forced swimming test in rats. The active behaviors in that test did not reflect increased general activity because combined administration of both the 5-HT1B antagonists and paroxetine failed to alter the locomotor activity of rats, measured in the open field test. Coadministration of fluoxetine and all the antagonists used did not affect the behavior of rats in the forced swimming test. The obtained results seem to indicate that blockade of 5-HT1B receptors, but not 5-HT1A ones, can facilitate the antidepressant-like effect of paroxetine in the forced swimming test in rats. No interaction was observed between fluoxetine and 5-HT1A/5-HT1B receptor antagonists.     

5-HT1A receptor antagonists neither potentiate nor inhibit the effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone in the forced swim test in rats.

Recent clinical data suggest that coadministration of pindolol with an antidepressant, particularly the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, can shorten the time to onset of clinical activity and increase the proportion of responders. We have examined the interaction of antidepressants with 5-HT1A receptors using the forced swim test in rats using both (+/-)-pindolol and the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride) in combination with either fluoxetine or the selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor befloxatone. 8-Hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT; 0.125-1 mg/kg s.c.), used as a reference for 5-HT1A agonist activity, reduced immobility in the forced swim test and this effect was significantly antagonised by WAY 100,635. WAY 100,635 alone (0.01-0.1 mg/kg s.c.) was without effect, although a higher dose, 0.3 mg/kg s.c., had a nonsignificant tendency to increase immobility. In contrast, (+/-)-pindolol (1-16 mg/kg s.c.) significantly reduced immobility, but to a lesser extent than 8-OH-DPAT. As expected, the antidepressants fluoxetine (10-80 mg/kg p.o.) and befloxatone (0.03-1 mg/kg p.o.) dose-dependently reduced immobility time. When the antidepressants were combined with WAY 100,635 (0.1 mg/kg), WAY 100,635 either had no effect or, at relatively high doses, significantly reduced their activity in this test. Combination of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol (2 or 4 mg/kg s.c.) failed to reveal a significant interaction. These results demonstrate that the anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine and befloxatone are neither facilitated nor antagonised by doses of WAY 100,635 that completely reverse the effects of 8-OH-DPAT. Furthermore, there was no evidence that coadministration of the antidepressants with (+/-)-pindolol was able to facilitate their antidepressant-like effects. Thus, whereas direct agonist activity at 5-HT1A receptors can modulate immobility in the forced swim test, this receptor subtype does not appear to play a major role in the antidepressant-like effects of fluoxetine or befloxatone under the conditions used in this study.     

Effect of combined administration of 5-HT1A or 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonists and antidepressants in the forced swimming test

In the present study, we examined effects of the selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor citalopram, the 5-HT/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor imipramine, the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor desipramine or the monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor moclobemide, administered in combination with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridynyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY 100635) or the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-[1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)1,1'-biphenyl-4-carboxamide (GR 127935) and the 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist N-[3-(2-dimethylamino) ethoxy-4-methoxyphenyl]-2'-methyl-4'-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)-(1,1'-biphenyl)-4-carboxamide (SB 216641) in the forced swimming test in rats. When given alone, citalopram (20 and 30 mg/kg), imipramine (20 mg/kg), desipramine (20 mg/kg), moclobemide (20 mg/kg), WAY 100635 (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), GR 127935 (10 and 20 mg/kg) or SB 216641 (2 mg/kg) did not shorten the immobility time of rats. Co-administration of WAY 100635 (0.1 and 1 mg/kg) and citalopram (20 mg/kg), or imipramine (20 mg/kg), or moclobemide (20 mg/kg) did not affect the immobility time of rats, whereas WAY 100635 given jointly with desipramine (20 mg/kg) induced a weak anti-immobility effect. GR 127935 (10 and 20 mg/kg) or SB 216641 (2 mg/kg) co-administered with imipramine, desipramine or moclobemide, but not citalopram, produced a significant anti-immobility action in the forced swimming test in rats. These results indicate that the blockade of 5-HT(1B) rather than 5-HT(1A) receptors may facilitate the anti-immobility effect of imipramine, desipramine or moclobemide in the forced swimming test. No interaction was observed between 5-HT(1A) or 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonists and citalopram.     

Latency to paroxetine-induced anxiolysis in the rat is reduced by co-administration of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100635

We report here the use of rat high-light social interaction to model the temporal anxiolytic/antidepressant effects of SSRIs seen in the clinic. Compared to vehicle controls, 21, but not 14, days of paroxetine treatment (3 mg kg(-1), p.o., daily) produced a marked increase in rat social interaction (Vehicle=71.3+/-7.3 s; Paroxetine=116.7+/-14.7 s; P<0.01) with no concurrent effect on locomotor activity, consistent with anxiolysis. To assess whether concurrent 5-HT(1A) receptor blockade reduces the time to onset of anxiolysis seen with paroxetine alone (21 days), rats were implanted with osmotic minipumps to continuously infuse the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY100635 (1 mg kg(-1) day(-1), s.c., 7 days) alone or in combination with paroxetine (3 mg kg(-1), p.o., daily, 7 days), prior to anxiety testing. Paroxetine (Veh/Par=61.9+/-7.9 s) or WAY100635 (WAY/Veh=71.6+/-4.7 s) alone, had no effect on social interaction time compared to vehicle treated controls (Veh/Veh=76.4+/-4.9 s), whilst coadministration of WAY100635 with paroxetine, produced a marked elevation in social interaction (WAY/Par=149.3+/-16.8 s; P<0.01) relative to all other groups with no concurrent change in locomotor activity. In contrast, acute administration of WAY100635 (0.03 mg kg(-1), s.c.) with paroxetine (3 mg kg(-1), p.o.) did not alter any behavioural measure, suggesting that the anxiolysis induced by the combination after 7 days is attributable to a CNS adaptive response. This data demonstrates that coadministration of a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist with paroxetine markedly reduces the latency to anxiolysis, in the rat. This study supports the use of the rat social interaction test to further delineate adaptive changes in the CNS responsible for the anxiolytic/antidepressant action of SSRIs seen in humans.     

In vivo/ex vivo and behavioural study on central effects of 5-HT1B/1D and 5-HT1A antagonists in guinea pigs

Serotonin 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/1D receptors control serotonin (5-HT) release and are targets for the pharmacological treatment of psychiatric disorders. We investigated effects of the 5-HT1B/1D antagonist GR127935, the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY 100635 and a combination of both in guinea pigs on the behaviour in the forced swimming test and on extracellular 5-HT in the hippocampus and the prefrontal cortex using in vivo microdialysis. Tissue content of 5-HT, 5-HIAA and 5-HT turnover (ratio 5-HIAA/5-HT) were determined in a sample containing i) the median and dorsal raphe nuclei, ii) the frontal cortex, or iii) the ventral hippocampus ex vivo. BEHAVIOUR: Administration of WAY 100635 (0.3-3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or GR127935 (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) or the combination of both delayed immobility in the forced swim test. MICRODIALYSIS: Systemic administration of WAY 100635 (1 mg/kg i.p.), perfusion with GR127935 (10 microM perfused into the frontal cortex) in the medial prefrontal cortex or the combination of both treatments had no significant effect on extracellular 5-HT. 5-HT TISSUE CONTENT AND 5-HT TURNOVER IN THE TISSUE: Compared to controls, WAY 100635, GR127935 and the combination thereof, decreased cortical 5-HT (-30%), increased 5-HIAA and consequently 5-HT turnover in the cortex threefold and the raphe nuclei twofold. WAY 100635 decreased 5-HT in the hippocampus (-40%), too. WAY 100635 and GR127935 and their combination increased hippocampal 5-HIAA and 5-HT turnover twofold, compared to controls. The results suggest that both 5-HT1 antagonists have subtle effects on 5-HT function under resting conditions; combined treatment has no superior effects compared to solitary treatment.     

Enhancement of the anti-immobility action of antidepressants by risperidone in the forced swimming test in mice

The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of antidepressants (ADs) belonging to different pharmacological groups and risperidone (an atypical antipsychotic drug), given separately or jointly, on immobility time in the forced swimming test in male C57BL/6J mice. The antidepressants: citalopram, fluvoxamine, sertraline, reboxetine, milnacipran (5 and 10 mg/kg), or risperidone in low doses (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) given alone did not change the immobility time of mice in the forced swimming test. Co-treatment with reboxetine or milnacipran (10 mg/kg) and risperidone in a lower dose of 0.05 mg/kg or with sertraline, reboxetine (5 and 10 mg/kg), citalopram, fluvoxamine, milnacipran (10 mg/kg) and risperidone in a higher dose of 0.1 mg/kg produced antidepressant-like effect in the forced swimming test. WAY100635 (a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist) inhibited the effects induced by co-administration of ADs and risperidone. Active behavior in the forced swimming test was not a consequence of an increased general activity, since the combined treatment with ADs and risperidone failed to enhance the locomotor activity of mice. The obtained results indicate that a low dose of risperidone enhances the activity of ADs in an animal model of depression, and that, among other mechanisms, 5-HT(1A) receptors may play a role in these effects.     

Alteration of 5-HIAA levels in frontal cortex and dorsal raphe nucleus in rats treated with combined administration of tryptophan and ethanol

The present studies sought to investigate the effect of tryptophan alone or coadministration of tryptophan and ethanol on the interaction of central frontal cortex and dorsal raphe nucleus serotonergic functional activities by utilizing in vivo microdialysis. Tryptophan (50 mg/kg, i.p.) led to a significant increase in the levels of 5-HIAA, a metabolite of serotonin (5-HT), in the dorsal raphe nucleus, but not in the frontal cortex. Coadministration of tryptophan and ethanol caused very marked increases in 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) levels in both the frontal cortex and the dorsal raphe nucleus, although ethanol (1.25 g/kg) did not change 5-HIAA levels in both areas. Moreover, the application of WAY100635 (10 muM), 5-HT(1A) antagonist, into the frontal cortex after coadministration caused a marked increase in 5-HIAA levels in the frontal cortex and a decrease in the levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus, although WAY100635 alone had no effect on these levels. This may suggest that WAY100635-induced increase of 5-HIAA levels in the frontal cortex resulted from negative feedback following the blockade of serotonergic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors, and that this increase in 5-HIAA levels decreased 5-HIAA levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus by preventing the activation of dorsal raphe 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors. WAY100635 into the dorsal raphe nucleus did not significantly change 5-HIAA levels in both areas. This may indicate that the blockade of dorsal raphe 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors by WAY100635 resulted in unchanged 5-HIAA levels in the frontal cortex. Behavioral sign of teeth-chattering was markedly observed following the coadministration and in combination with WAY100635. These results may suggest that the increased 5-HIAA levels in both areas after coadministration are indicative of the interrelation via activation of serotonergic neurons, and that the increased levels are partly responsible for behavioral activation of rats.     

Potential serotonin 5-HT(1A) and dopamine D(4) receptor modulation of the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine in rats

Activation of the dopaminergic system underlies the behavioral effects of (+)-amphetamine, and plays a major role in its discriminative stimulus properties. Although serotonin receptors modulate dopamine levels in the brain, and 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2) receptor agonists do not mimic (+)-amphetamine, pretreatment with 5-HT(2A/2C) agonists significantly potentiates the (+)-amphetamine cue. Further, 5-HT(2) antagonists do not modify the discriminative stimulus effect of (+)-amphetamine, but 5-HT(1A) antagonists have never been tested in (+)-amphetamine-trained rats. This study sought to characterize the effects of the 5-HT(1A) antagonist WAY 100635 on (+)-amphetamine-induced discriminative stimulus effects. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained in a two-lever, fixed ratio 50, food-reinforced task with (+)-amphetamine sulfate (1.0 mg/kg, i.p., 30 min pretreatment time) as the discriminative stimulus. Substitution and combination tests with WAY 100635 were then performed. WAY 100635 did not produce substitution in amphetamine-trained rats, but significantly increased behavioral disruption. In combination tests 0.4 and 5.4 mg/kg doses of WAY 100635 potentiated the amphetamine cue. We suggest that low doses of WAY 100635 potentiated the (+)-amphetamine cue by blockade of 5-HT(1A) receptors, but stimulation of the dopamine D(4) receptor by higher doses of WAY 100635 may be responsible for potentiation of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization. The high percentage of behavioral disruption in substitution tests might suggest that rats trained to discriminate (+)-amphetamine from saline show behavioral sensitization that is not detectable by the drug discrimination assay but may be expressed as hyperactivity and stereotypic behavior that disrupts operant behavior.     

Antidepressant-like effects of Albizzia julibrissin in mice: involvement of the 5-HT1A receptor system

The present study was undertaken to investigate the antidepressant-like effects of the methylene chloride fraction of Albizzia julibrissin (MCAJ) using a tail suspension test in mice. MCAJ was orally administered at 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg to mice, 1 h before the tail suspension test. Acute treatment with MCAJ at 200 mg/kg significantly reduced the immobility time compared with the control group, and thus showed an antidepressant-like effect. This effect was comparable to that of imipramine at 10 mg/kg. This antidepressant-like effect was reversed by treatment with WAY-100635 (a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist) or pindolol (a 5-HT1A/1B receptor antagonist). However, the antidepressant effect of MCAJ was not effected by treatment with GR55562 (a 5-HT1B receptor antagonist) or ketanserin (a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist). Therefore, our findings suggest that MCAJ exerts its antidepressant-like effect via the 5-HT1A receptor system.     

Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on immobility time in the tail suspension test in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice

We examined the effects of fluoxetine and fluvoxamine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and desipramine, a selective noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor, given alone or in combination with diazepam on immobility time in the tail suspension test in diabetic mice. Immobility time was significantly longer in diabetic than in nondiabetic mice. Diazepam (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg s.c.) dose-dependently decreased immobility time in diabetic mice to the level observed in saline-treated nondiabetic mice. However, diazepam had no significant effect on immobility time in nondiabetic mice. Fluoxetine (3-56 mg/kg i.p.) and desipramine (1-30 mg/kg i.p.) produced marked, dose-dependent suppression of immobility time in both nondiabetic and diabetic mice. However, anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine and desipramine in diabetic mice were less than those in nondiabetic mice. Fluvoxamine (3-30 mg/kg i.p.) produced a dose-dependent suppression of immobility time in nondiabetic mice but not in diabetic mice. The anti-immobility effects of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and desipramine in nondiabetic mice were antagonized by pretreatment with diazepam (0.3 mg/kg s.c.). Furthermore, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and desipramine had no effect on the immobility time in diazepam (0.3 mg/kg s.c.)-treated diabetic mice. These results indicate that the anti-immobility effects of SSRIs and desipramine are less in diabetic mice than in nondiabetic mice in the tail suspension test. Furthermore, in diabetic mice, SSRIs and selective NA reuptake inhibitors did not affect immobility time even though the prolonged duration of immobility was suppressed by pretreatment with diazepam.     

Co-administration of fluoxetine and WAY100635 improves short-term memory function

The aim of this study was to determine whether the action of the antidepressant fluoxetine or the anxiolytic buspirone could be modified by specific 5-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT(1A)) receptor blockade in a short-term memory paradigm. Male Wistar rats were trained to perform the putative short-term memory task, delayed non-matching to position. WAY100635, a selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist (0.15 mg/kg), was administered 15 min before either the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine (3 mg/kg), or the partial 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist and dopamine D2 receptor antagonist, buspirone (0.3 mg/kg). 8-Hydroxy-di-n-propylamino tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), a full 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist (0.3 mg/kg), was also included in the study as a positive control. WAY100635 alone had no effect on any behavioural parameter measured (response accuracy, delay lever press activity and trial completion). 8-OH-DPAT impaired response accuracy in a delay-dependent manner, an effect reversed by WAY100635. Fluoxetine also impaired response accuracy delay-dependently. WAY100635 pretreatment not only reversed this deficit but improved response accuracy, in the presence of a significant deficit in trial completion. At the dose used, buspirone showed no significant differences compared to the control group. The data suggest that fluoxetine impairs short-term memory function by the indirect activation of 5-HT(1A) receptors, but that its co-administration with WAY100635 improves short-term memory function.     

WAY100635 prevents the changes induced by fluoxetine upon the 5-HT1A receptor functionality

5-HT1A receptor-mediated signalling in rat brain was evaluated after chronic administration (14 days; s.c.) of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRRI) fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/day) alone, or in combination with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg/day). The density of 5-HT1A binding sites was unchanged following fluoxetine, WAY100635, or the combination of fluoxetine and WAY100635. However, the net stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding induced by the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT was significantly attenuated in dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN), but not in hippocampus, after chronic fluoxetine. Moreover, depending of the area analysed, the basal binding of [35S]GTPgammaS was differentially affected by this treatment: increased in DRN and decreased in hippocampal dentate gyrus. Interestingly, the changes in [35S]GTPgammaS basal binding and on 5-HT1A receptors functionality were prevented by the concomitant administration of WAY100635. The inhibition of dorsal raphe firing by 8-OH-DPAT was also attenuated in fluoxetine-treated rats (ED50 = 2.12 +/- 0.32 microg/kg and 4.34 +/- 0.09 microg/kg, for vehicle and fluoxetine respectively), an effect which was also prevented by the concomitant administration of WAY100635 (ED50 = 2.10 +/- 0.58 microg/kg). Chronic administration of WAY100635 alone did not affect the 5-HT1A receptor-induced stimulation of [35S]GTPgammaS binding, nor the 8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of 5-HT neuron firing. These results demonstrate that the concomitant blockade of 5-HT1A receptors when administering fluoxetine prevents those adaptive changes of 5-HT1A receptor function associated with the chronic administration of this antidepressant. These findings could be relevant from the therapeutic point of view, and further support the potential benefit of treatments with a SSRI/5-HT1A receptor antagonist combination.     

Effects of the serotonin 5-HT(2) antagonist, ritanserin, and the serotonin 5-HT(1A) antagonist, WAY 100635, on cocaine-seeking in rats

Manipulations of serotonergic systems have been shown to modify many of the behavioral effects of cocaine. It was recently demonstrated that serotonin (5-HT) depletions produced by inhibition of tryptophan hydroxylase reduced cocaine-seeking in an animal model. The present study was designed to determine whether pretreatment with specific 5-HT antagonists might also decrease cocaine-seeking. The effect of pretreatment with the 5-HT(2) antagonist, ritanserin (0.0, 1.0, or 10.0 mg/kg), or the 5-HT(1A) antagonist, WAY 100635 (0. 0, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg/kg), on cocaine (5.0, 10.0, or 20.0 mg/kg)-produced reinstatement of extinguished drug-taking behavior was measured. Although ritanserin was ineffective, WAY 100635 attenuated cocaine-produced reinstatement in a dose-dependent manner. These effects of WAY 100635 appeared to be specific since responding maintained by saccharin self-administration remained high following pretreatment with 0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg WAY 100635. These data suggest a role of 5-HT(1A), but not 5-HT(2), receptors in cocaine-seeking.     

Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol prolongs the immobility time in the mouse forced swim test: involvement of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor and serotonergic system

In the present study, we investigated the effect of Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component of marijuana, on immobility time during the forced swim test. THC (2 and 6 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly prolonged the immobility time. In addition, THC at the same doses did not significantly affect locomotor activity in the open-field test. The selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist rimonabant (3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced the enhancement of immobility by THC (6 mg/kg). Similarly, the selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) citalopram (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin (8-OH-DPAT, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly reduced this THC-induced effect. Moreover, the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexane carboxamide dihydrochloride (WAY100635, 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and the postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist MM-77 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) reversed this reduction effect of 8-OH-DPAT (0.3 mg/kg). In contrast, the selective 5-HT(7) receptor antagonist (R)-3-[2-[2-(4-methylpiperidin-1-yl)ethyl]pyrrolidine-1-sulfonyl]phenol hydrochloride (SB269970) had no effect on this reduction effect of 8-OH-DPAT. WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) also reversed the reduction effect of citalopram (10 mg/kg). These findings suggest that the 5-HT(1A) receptors are involved in THC-induced enhancement of immobility.     

Antidepressant-like pharmacological profile of 3-(4-fluorophenylselenyl)-2,5-diphenylselenophene: Involvement of serotonergic system

This study evaluated the effect of 3-(4-fluorophenylselenyl)-2,5-diphenylselenophene (DPS) in the mouse forced swim test (FST) and tail suspension test (TST), two assays predictive of depressant activity. The involvement of serotonergic system in the effect caused by DPS was studied. The antidepressant-like effect of combined treatment with subeffetive doses of DPS and paroxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) was investigated. Further, we verified the possible mechanism responsible for antidepressive-like effect of DPS. The results show that DPS (50 and 100 mg/kg, p.o.) significantly reduced the immobility time during the FST and TST, without accompanying changes in ambulation when assessed in the open-field test. The anti-immobility effect of DPS (50 mg/kg, p.o.) in the FST was prevented by pretreatment of mice with pCPA (100 mg/kg, i.p., once a day for 4 consecutive days, an inhibitor of 5-HT synthesis), WAY 100635 (0.1 mg/kg, s.c., a selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist), ritanserin (1 mg/kg, i.p., a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist) or ondansetron (1 mg/kg, i.p., a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist). Combined treatment with paroxetine and DPS reduced the immobility time in the FST. DPS at the doses of 10-100 mg/kg did not produce any change in the cerebral activity of MAO-A or MAO-B. DPS at the dose of 50 mg/kg inhibited significantly 5-HT uptake in synaptosomes. These results suggest that DPS produced an antidepressant-like effect in the mouse FST and TST and this effect seems most likely to be mediated through an interaction with serotonergic system, particularly by 5-HT reuptake inhibition.     

Characterization of D-fenfluramine-induced hypothermia: evidence for multiple sites of action

The effects of D-fenfluramine on core body temperature has been largely investigated under conditions of either high or low ambient temperature, whereas little research has focused on this response under normal environmental conditions. Moreover, there has been neglect in research on the mechanisms underlying changes in body temperature. In this study, we demonstrate that D-fenfluramine (5 and 10 mg/kg) induces a sustained decrease in body temperature in the rat under normal ambient temperatures. Pre-treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline (5 mg/kg), the full 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist 4-fluoro-N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-2-pyridinyl benzamide], WAY 100635 (0.15 mg/kg) and the 5-HT(2C) receptor antagonist benzofuran-2-carboxamidine, RO 43-0440 (2.5 mg/kg) blocked D-fenfluramine-induced hypothermia. Depletion of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) stores following treatment with the serotonergic neurotoxin parachlorophenylalanine reversed the initial hypothermic effects of D-fenfluramine but not the later effects, as D120 min post-challenge) in animals pre-treated with parachlorophenylalanine. Such findings are consistent with a requirement for D-fenfluramine uptake into 5-HT neurons followed by release of 5-HT from intracellular stores and stimulation of post-synaptic 5-HT receptors to reduce body temperature. The hypothermic response to D-fenfluramine was potentiated by ketanserin pre-treatment 30 min post-challenge but then antagonized at later time intervals. Pre-treatment with the dopamine, D(2) antagonist, haloperidol (1 mg/kg) and sulpiride (30 mg/kg) had a similar effect in blocking the hypothermia as WAY 100635, suggesting a role for dopamine D(2) receptors in the response. Pre-treatment with the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine failed to block the hypothermic response. These results suggest multiple sites of action mediating D-fenfluramine-induced hypothermia and may be the result of a combined effect of D-fenfluramine and its active metabolite norfenfluramine affecting not only the release of 5-HT but also stimulation of post-synaptic receptors.     

Effects of selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonists on regional serotonin synthesis in the rat brain: an autoradiographic study with alpha-[14C]methyl-L-tryptophan.

The effects of acute and chronic administration of WAY100635 and WAY100135, serotonin (5-HT)1A antagonists, on 5-HT synthesis rates, calculated from the trapping of alpha-[14C]methyl-L-tryptophan (alpha-MTrp), were evaluated in the rat brain using autoradiography. In the acute treatment studies, WAY100635 (1 mg/kg) induced a significant increase in 5-HT synthesis in the median raphe nucleus and some nerve terminal structures (range between 18 and 53%), while WAY100135 (10 mg/kg) produced a significant decrease of synthesis, in the range between 16 and 33%, in the raphe magnus nucleus and several projection areas. The action of WAY100635 given acutely was likely a result of antagonist actions at the 5-HT1A somato-dendritic autoreceptors. WAY100135 probably acted acutely as a partial agonist. In the chronic treatment studies, WAY100635 (1 mg/kg/day) and WAY100135 (10 mg/kg/day) were administered for 7 days as s.c. injections once a day. Chronic treatment with both compounds significantly reduced the rate of 5-HT synthesis in the nerve terminal structures and produced a significant increase in the raphe nuclei. These treatments did not have any effect on the plasma free or total tryptophan.     

Acute effect of milnacipran on the relationship between the locus coeruleus noradrenergic and dorsal raphe serotonergic neuronal transmitters

The present studies sought to investigate the effect of milnacipran called the serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) on the interaction of central locus coeruleus noradrenergic and dorsal raphe nucleus serotonergic functional activity by utilizing in vivo microdialysis. A single administration of milnacipran (60 mg/kg, s.c.) markedly decreased the levels of NA and its metabolite, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxymandelic acid (HMMA), in the locus coeruleus and the levels of, a metabolite of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid (5-HIAA) in the dorsal raphe nucleus. Combined administration of yohimbine (2 mg/kg, s.c.),?alpha(2)-adrenoceptor?antagonist, at 2 h after milnacipran (60 mg/kg, s.c.) led to a significant increase in NA levels in the locus coeruleus, although yohimbine alone had no effect on these levels. Under similar experimental condition, 5-HIAA levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus remained unchanged. NAN-190 (1 mg/kg, s.c.), 5-HT(1A) receptor partial agonist, alone markedly decreased the levels of 5-HIAA in the dorsal raphe nucleus, although this level was not affected by WAY100635, the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist. WAY100635 recovered the milnacipran-induced decrease of 5-HIAA levels in the dorsal raphe nucleus to control levels. On the other hand, NAN-190 did not affect the milnacipran-induced decrease of 5-HIAA levels. Behavioral signs (locomotion and rearing) were markedly observed following milnacipran alone or combined administration of milnacipran and yohimbine. However, the behavioral signs after coadministration of milnacipran and WAY100635 or NAN-190 were relatively poor. These results may suggest that an increase of NA in the locus coeruleus with the treatment of yohimbine after milnacipran results from negative feedback following the blockade of alpha(2)-adrenoceptors achieved with yohimbine, and that WAY100635 but not NAN-190 recovered milnacipran-induced decrease of 5-HIAA in the dorsal raphe nucleus to control levels by preventing the activation for the presynaptic 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor.     

Participation of the 5-HT1A receptor in the antidepressant-like effect of estrogens in the forced swimming test.

The aim of the present study was to explore the possible participation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor in the antidepressant-like action of two estrogenic compounds: 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) and ethynil-estradiol (EE(2)) in the FST. Ovariectomized female Wistar rats were used in all experiments. As a positive control, the effect of the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n)-propil-aminotetraline (8-OH-DPAT; 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg) alone or in combination with WAY 100635 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) was analyzed in the FST. In order to analyze the participation of the 5-HT(1A) receptor in the antidepressant-like actions of estrogens, the effect of the selective antagonist WAY 100635 (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg) in combination with E(2) (10 microg/rat) and EE(2) (5 microg/rat) was studied in the FST. In this case, WAY 100635 was administered either simultaneously with the estrogens (48 h before the FST test) or 30 min before the FST. On the other hand, a suboptimal dose of 8-OH-DPAT (0.0625 mg/kg), combined with a noneffective dose of E(2) (2.5 microg/rat) or EE(2) (1.25 microg/rat), was tested in the FST. The results showed that 8-OH-DPAT (0.25 and 0.5 mg/kg), E(2) (10 microg/rat), and EE(2) (5 microg/rat), by themselves, exerted an antidepressant-like action. The antagonist to the 5-HT(1A) receptor WAY 100635, when applied together with 8-OH-DPAT or E(2), blocked their antidepressant-like actions, but not the one induced by EE(2). Interestingly, when the antagonist was applied 30 min before the FST, it was able to cancel the actions of EE(2) on immobility behavior, and had no effect on the actions of E(2.) Finally, when a subthreshold dose of 8-OH-DPAT was combined with a noneffective dose of either E(2) or EE(2), an antidepressant-like action was observed. The results support the notion that the 5-HT(1A) receptor is one of the mediators of the antidepressant-like action of E(2), and could indirectly contribute to the one induced by EE(2).