Mental health nurse supplementary prescribing: experiences of mental health nurses, psychiatrists and patients

AIM: This paper is a report of a study to explore the views of patients, mental health nurses and psychiatrists involved in mental health nurse supplementary prescribing. BACKGROUND: Medication prescribing by mental health nurses in the United Kingdom is controversial. However, the experience of mental health patients suggests that increasing prescribing capacity could be one strategy to provide a person-centred prescribing approach. METHOD: A qualitative study was carried out in 2005. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 psychiatrists, 11 mental health nurses with prescribing authority, and 12 patients who had been prescribed psychiatric medication by a mental health nurse. Participants were interviewed about positive aspects of supplementary prescribing including the extent of it being evidence-based, person-centred and clinically focussed. FINDINGS: Participants from all three groups had a positive reaction to nurse supplementary prescribing. Mental health nurse prescribing was viewed as evidence-based, person-centred and with an additional focus on physical health. Mental health nurses worked within their levels of competency. Barriers to the implementation of mental health nurse prescribing were nurses' lack of prescribing experience, shortfalls in supervision, insufficient focus on redesigning the service to support the role of the mental health nurse, and preparation for the role. CONCLUSION: Mental health nurse prescribing seems potentially beneficial. However, more rigorous audit and evaluation are needed to confirm its safety, patient satisfaction and health outcomes. Mental health nurse prescribing will require service redesign to ensure that is becomes embedded in the service organizational culture.     

Nurse prescribers: who are they and how do they perceive their role?

AIMS: This paper reports a study to elicit background data from recently qualified nurse prescribers and explore aspects of their work. BACKGROUND: Nurse prescribing has been introduced quite recently in the United Kingdom. Although a certain amount of information is available about the characteristics of nurse prescribers, relatively little is known about their professional backgrounds, their reasons for choosing to become nurse prescribers and their perceptions of their emerging role. More information is needed to inform the selection, education and support of nurse prescribers. METHOD: All nurses who undertook a nurse prescribing course in one university in the West Midlands during 2003-2004 were invited to participate in the study. A 40-item questionnaire was used to gather data on demographics, expectations of nurse prescribing, personal and professional development and perceived education needs. FINDINGS: Respondents considered that, despite initial problems, the nurse prescribing initiative would ultimately prove to be a cornerstone of improved service delivery for service users. The majority of nurses were already heavily involved in prescribing 'by proxy' and the course merely formalized what they were currently doing. Potentially, prescribing could advance the professional development of nurses, improve communication between professionals and patients, and make the experience of patients more beneficial. However, some concerns were expressed about how supportive the current climate in health care could be, given the multiple demands on time and energy required by so many other innovations. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents appeared balanced in their perceptions of this innovation and what it could realistically achieve. They were not indifferent to the many short and long-term problems that need to be resolved before it can be claimed to have become embedded in practice. The success of non-medical prescribing may depend on organizational support, coupled with a robust continuing professional development strategy for all nurse prescribers.     

Nurse prescribing in specialist mental health (part 1): the views and experiences of practising and non-practising nurse prescribers and service users

Non-medical prescribing is a relatively new competency that appears to benefit both service users and health professionals alike. However, little is known about its use in mental health settings. This single case study in one UK National Health Service (NHS) Trust aimed to look at these views and consider how the role can be developed further in light of this. Six service users and two nurses trained in nurse prescribing were individually interviewed. One trained nurse had been prescribing for the last 3 years; the other was trained but had never practised. Service users reported that nurse prescribing was more convenient and less anxiety provoking, an issue of particular importance for optimizing mental health services. Offering choice was deemed important; however, for some service users, information about why medication may be beneficial was highlighted as an unmet need in the prescribing process. The practising nurse prescriber described her experiences and credited a good structure of supervision and support from the team. Reasons why trained nurse prescribers may not be practising are discussed, with suggestions for future developments and guidance. This competence appears to work well in a mental health setting when conducted in a supported and structured way.     

Supplementary nurse prescribing for patients with skin conditions: a national questionnaire survey

Aim. To examine the prescribing practices of supplementary nurse prescribers (working in both primary and secondary care) who prescribe medicines for patients with skin conditions and the factors that facilitate or inhibit this mode of prescribing. Background. Nurses work in a variety of roles, with varying levels of expertise, are involved in the treatment management of a broad range of skin diseases. Skin conditions are those for which independent nurse prescribers prescribe most frequently. The role of the nurse, limitations of the formulary and inter‐professional relationships influence the prescribing practices of these nurses. There is no evidence currently available examining the impact and activity of supplementary nurse prescribing for patients with skin conditions. Methods. A convenient sample of 580 nurses who prescribed for skin conditions and were qualified supplementary nurse prescriber, self‐completed a written questionnaire. Results. Five hundred and twenty (89·7%) nurses were based in primary care and worked in general practice. Four hundred and thirty‐six (75%) held a degree level qualification or higher, 41 (7%) had specialist dermatology training and 512 (88·3%) had more than 10 years postregistration nursing experience. Supplementary prescribing was used by a minority of nurses. Nurses who had specialist dermatology training used this mode of prescribing most frequently. Doctor and pharmacists lack of understanding of supplementary prescribing, lack of peer support and clinical management plans prevented the implementation of this mode of prescribing. Conclusions. Supplementary prescribing is used by a minority of nurses to treat skin conditions. A number of factors prevent nurses from using this mode of prescribing including lack of specialist training and lack of support in practice. Relevance to clinical practice. Specialist dermatology training, an understanding of supplementary prescribing by the members of the healthcare team, and support in practice are required if supplementary prescribing is to be implemented effectively for the treatment of skin conditions.     

Exploring nurses' experiences of prescribing in secondary care: informing future education and practice

Aims and objectives. To explore the experiences of secondary care nurse prescribers to establish how prescribing is employed and what its benefits and disadvantages are perceived to be. Background. Nurse prescribing has developed rapidly since it inception almost 20 years ago and there is a significant body of research evaluating its implementation in primary care. Recent expansion of non‐medical prescribing rights has prompted nurses in secondary care establishments to become prescribers. Evaluation of nurse prescribing in this new environment is required, if practice is to be informed and advanced. The lack of such evaluations in the published literature was the impetus for this study. Design. A cross‐sectional qualitative study. Methods. A convenience sample of nurse prescribers was interviewed using a single broad question to prompt elaboration. Transcribed interviews were analysed using Colaizzi’s procedural steps. Results. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: motivations behind becoming a nurse prescriber; benefits and limitations of prescribing education and continuing professional development and prescribing in practice. Conclusion. Nurses felt nurse prescribing offers clear benefits in relation to patient care. Where nurses were not prescribing, finance arrangements between different NHS trusts appear to be a significant barrier to its successful implementation of prescribing in practice. Nurse prescribing is strongly believed to be the domain of the experienced nurse. There is a clear need for ongoing evaluation of all aspects of nurse prescribing. Relevance to clinical practice. This paper makes key recommendations on the future development and delivery of programmes of education for nurse prescribers and for the delivery of safe and effective prescribing in practice.     

Impact of nurse prescribing: a qualitative study

AIM: This paper is a report of an investigation of the impact of prescribing on a group of recently qualified nurse prescribers in the United Kingdom. BACKGROUND: The creation of advanced nursing roles, and specific skills such as nurse prescribing, has resulted in nurses taking on roles that have traditionally been associated with doctors. The non-doctor prescribing initiative is continually developing and many nurses are now able to prescribe independently from almost the same range of medicines as doctors. Despite the advantages that appear to stem from nurses prescribing, some nurse researchers have been cautious about the impact that prescribing may have on the nursing profession. METHOD: Interviews were conducted during 2005 and 2006 with 45 nurse prescribers. All nurses had successfully qualified and registered as prescribers. Interviews were analysed thematically in line with the principles of grounded theory. FINDINGS: Prescribing allows nurses to overcome difficulties in the healthcare system that previously delayed patients' access to medicines. Prescribing is viewed as more than an 'add on' to current roles, it complements many aspects of nursing and integrates previously diffuse aspects of the nursing role. This enables nurses to adopt a more holistic approach to patient care and prescribing. Prescribing has the potential to increase job satisfaction and autonomous working, with the result that nurses are more likely to involve patients in decision-making about their care. CONCLUSIONS: Prescribing enhances nurses' knowledge about medication and increases their confidence to engage in prescribing decisions across the healthcare team. Nurse prescribing has the potential to improve service-user care, enhance collaboration and widen discussions about medicines. However, team members need to be prepared for the impact nurse prescribing could have on the dynamics of the multidisciplinary team. Preparatory information about nurse prescribing should be provided to all team members by trainee nurse prescribers. Information could include details about the proposed scope of future prescribing roles, allowing team members to consider how their roles could develop.     

Nurse independent prescribing and nurse supplementary prescribing practice: national survey

Title. Nurse independent prescribing and nurse supplementary prescribing practice: national survey Aim. This paper is a report of a survey to provide an overview of nurse independent prescribing and nurse supplementary prescribing across the United Kingdom. Background. Evidence examining the frequency of prescribing by nurses is conflicting, and it is evident that several factors hamper prescribing practice. As of May 2006, legislative changes gave appropriately qualified nurses virtually the same independent prescribing right as doctors. However, there is currently no evidence available about the prescribing practices of these nurses. Method. A random sample of 1992 qualified Nurse Independent/Nurse Supplementary Prescribers registered with the Nursing and Midwifery Council was sent a postal questionnaire in 2006. A total of 1400 (70%) questionnaires were returned, of which 1377 were completed. Findings. Eight hundred and ninety‐one (65%) respondents worked in primary care, and 333 (24·3%) worked in secondary care. Three quarters of the sample had more than 5‐year clinical experience in the area in which they prescribed prior to entering the prescribing programme. One thousand one hundred and seven (87%) participants had used nurse independent prescribing and 568 (44·6%) nurse supplementary prescribing. Restriction of local arrangements, implementation of the Clinical Management Plan and access to doctors hampered or prevented prescribing. Conclusion. The adoption of prescribing by nurses in the United Kingdom has increased patient choice with regard to access to medicines. A number of factors which hamper or prevent prescribing require further exploration.     

Role of a paediatric nurse in primary care 1: research issues

This study, which looked at the potential for the role of a paediatric nurse in primary care, was a tripartite partnership arrangement with Community Health Sheffield NHS Trust, the University of Sheffield and the Children's Hospital Sheffield. The study focused on the role and function of two qualified children's nurses each working within a different primary healthcare team (PHCT). It was important to allow the role to evolve without undue pressure, so that members of the PHCT could work with the nurses to establish what would be the most useful and relevant tasks to be carried out by the team. The methodological problems posed in this type of study where little was known about how a children's nurse would work in a PHCT resulted in exploring the concept of a formative evaluation process. The major data source and contribution to the evaluation were the nurses' reflective accounts of their role and function as members of the PHCT. Case studies written in the form of reflective diaries provided a self-critical approach to the record of tasks undertaken and explained why the service was taken up. Five constructions emerged: duplication and perceived threats to established nursing roles within the PHCT; improved care of children in PHCT settings; the nature of support for children and families; working as a nurse practitioner; and meeting unmet need. A clear need was demonstrated for a qualified children's nurse working in a community setting to raise the overall support and quality of care for a whole range of conditions which are currently low profile. There was evidence that these nurses met unmet need and were, at times, functioning as nurse practitioners and at times as advanced practitioners. This article, the first of two parts, focuses on the methods used and the associated problems. The second part will present the findings and discussions of the research.     

Non‐medical prescribing in prostate cancer care: a case study reflection

There are approximately 54 000 nurse and midwife prescribers across the United Kingdom (UK), with 19 000 nurse independent and supplementary prescribers. Prostate cancer specialist nurses are ideally suited to implement advanced levels of practice in non‐medical prescribing, but little has been detailed in the literature about the prescribing practice in this clinical context. This paper set out to critically review evidence‐based recommendations for Prostate Cancer Specialist Nurses using a case study reflection to contextualize the role of non‐medical prescribing. A structured literature review was conducted in a range of electronic databases (DARE, Cochrane, MEDLINE, BNI, PsychINFO, EMBASE and CIHAHL), and a grey literature search in google, to identify studies employing a qualitative and/or quantitative methods. National (UK) and European clinical guidelines and legislative frameworks were also included. Methodological evaluation was conducted and evidence‐based recommendations were integrated into a narrative synthesis. A multidisciplinary and proactive approach to the management of men with metastatic prostate cancer ensures safe and effective prescribing practice, and optimizes supportive care delivery. A reflective case study has illuminated the key features necessary to maximize the success of non‐medical prescribing in prostate cancer care and captures the importance of good working relationships. While different practice models will emerge, the Prostate Cancer Model of Consultation may facilitate a structured framework for safe practice, embedded in effective communication strategies. Non‐medical prescribers must be committed to continual professional development, and prescribe safely within individual competencies and scope of professional practice. There is a pressing need for further research to evaluate prescribing practices with a particular focus on the nature of influencing factors on prescribing decisions, cost‐effectiveness and a more detailed understanding of how team working and inter‐team referral affects prescribing decisions between the Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) members.     

Neuropharmacology and mental health nurse prescribers

Aims and objectives. To outline the development and content of a ‘top‐up’ neuropharmacology module for mental health nurse prescribers and consider how much pharmacology training is required to ensure effective mental health prescribing practice. Background. Debate about the content of prescribing training courses has persisted within the United Kingdom since the mid‐1980s. In early 2003 supplementary prescribing was introduced and gave mental health nurses the opportunity to become prescribers. The challenge of the nurse prescribing curriculum for universities is that they have only a short time to provide nurses from a range of backgrounds with enough knowledge to ensure that they meet agreed levels of competency for safe prescribing. There is growing concern within mental health care that the prescribing of medication in mental health services falls short of what would be deemed good practice. Over the past two decades, nurse training has increasingly adopted a psychosocial approach to nursing care raising concerns that, although nurses attending prescribing training may be able to communicate effectively with service users, they may lack the basic knowledge of biology and pharmacology to make effective decisions about medication. Methods. Following the completion of a general nurse prescribing course, mental health nurses who attended were asked to identify their specific needs during the evaluation phase. Although they had covered basic pharmacological principles in their training, they stated that they needed more specific information about drugs used in mental health; particularly how to select appropriate drug treatments for mental health conditions. This paper describes how the nurses were involved in the design of a specific module which would enable them to transfer their theoretical leaning to practice and in so doing increase their confidence in their new roles. Results. The findings of this study suggest that the understanding and confidence of mental health nurse prescribers about the drugs they prescribe coupled with the information they provide to service users can be improved as a result of specific educational support. It would appear that adopting a prescribing dimension to one's role requires nurses to revisit a number of skills that are integral to the work of the mental health nurse, e.g. good communication, establishing empathy, listening to what clients say, responding to what is required and involving clients in their own care. Conclusion. Mental health nurses from one particular Trust in the West Midlands were provided with a ‘top‐up’ course in neuropharmacology and, although they found this challenging, ultimately they found this to be helpful. As nurse prescribing is ‘rolled out’ to other nursing specialities it is important that local Trusts and Workforce Development Directorates maintain a dialogue about nurse prescriber training to ensure that nurse prescribers receive the appropriate time and support for their ongoing Continued Professional Development. Relevance to clinical practice. As increasing numbers of nurses from different specialities qualify as nurse prescribers it is vital that they are supported by their employing organizations and given the opportunity to maintain their competency and confidence in their prescribing practice.     

Nurse prescribers: infrastructures required to support their role

AIM: This study aims to answer the question: what are the opinions of nurse prescribing students about infrastructures required to support nurse prescribing? METHOD: Two researchers collected data from 12 focus groups (six health visitor and six district nurse groups) made up of students undertaking a course in nurse prescribing at the University of Central Lancashire. The total number of people who participated in the study was 146. RESULTS: Ten themes were identified by the focus groups as necessary infrastructures to support nurse prescribing. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that, for nurse prescribers to fulfil their new role effectively, a variety of mechanisms are necessary. These supporting infrastructures are vital to the success of nurse prescribing and are likely to result in a more confident and competent prescribing workforce.     

Mental health nurse prescribing: issues for the UK

Supplementary nurse prescribing holds the key to rapid developments in psychiatric nursing and the care received by patients. In this paper, the origins, context and research data on nurse prescribing are reviewed, as a backdrop to a discussion on potential application of supplementary prescribing in a number of mental health settings. We describe a number of practice settings where nurse prescribing could be implemented, and argue that given service changes and informative educational preparation, access to care and user experience of that care will be enhanced. We conclude the paper by reviewing a number of clinical, organizational and research factors important for the success of nurse prescribing.     

Exploring the views of nurse prescribing among Macmillan nurses

Nurse prescribing is a key government initiative which aims to enhance patient care. The aim of this study was to investigate the prescribing practice of specialist nurses working in cancer and palliative care and to explore the benefits of and barriers to uptake of nurse prescribing training. A national postal survey of 2252 Macmillan nurses was undertaken using a structured questionnaire with open-ended questions. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis for 1575 respondents (70% response rate). Only 13% (203) had undergone prescribing training and of these 105 provided responses to the open questions concerning training and of the 87% (1372) who had not undergone the training, 423 provided details on barriers to nurse prescribing training. The data presented in this paper draw from this data. The findings indicate that those who prescribed gave the prospect of improving care as the main reason for undertaking nurse prescribing training. The main reasons why these specialist nurses did not undertake training were: resource issues particularly with respect to backfill while training, lack of medical support and mentorship, concerns about the relevance of prescribing as a nursing role and prioritizing other courses. If nurse prescribing is to be more widely available for cancer and palliative care patients it is important in both primary and secondary care to address the resource and support issues.     

A 5‐year retrospective audit of prescribing by a critical care outreach team

UK prescribing legislation changes made in 2006 and 2012 enabled appropriately qualified nurses to prescribe any licensed medication, and all controlled drugs in schedule 2–5 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, for any medical condition within their clinical competence. Critical Care Outreach nurses who are independent nurse prescribers are ideally placed to ensure that acutely ill patients receive treatment without delay. The perceived challenge was how Critical Care Outreach nurses would be able to safely prescribe for a diverse patient group. This study informs this developing area of nurse prescribing in critical care practice. The aims of the audit were to: identify which medications were prescribed; develop a critical care outreach formulary; identify the frequency, timing and number of prescribing decisions being made; identify if prescribing practice changed over the years and provide information for our continuing professional development. This article reports on data collected from a 5‐year retrospective audit; of prescribing activity undertaken by nine independent nurse prescribers working in a 24/7 Critical Care Outreach team of a 600‐bedded district general hospital in the UK. In total, 8216 medication items were prescribed, with an average of 2·6 prescribed per shift. The most commonly prescribed items were intravenous fluids and analgesia, which were mostly prescribed at night and weekends. The audit has shown that Critical Care Outreach nurse prescribing is feasible in a whole hospital patient population. The majority of prescribing occurred after 16:00 and at night. Further research would be beneficial, particularly looking at patient outcomes following reviews from prescribing critical care outreach nurses. The audit is one of the only long‐term studies that describes prescribing practice in Critical Care Outreach teams in the UK.     

Supplementary prescribing case study

A principle aim of supplementary prescribing is to enable faster access to medicines for people who have a chronic condition. The example of a young person with diabetes is used to demonstrate the benefits of nurse specialists being able to prescribe. The way in which prescribing requirements, such as clinical management plans, relate to existing multi-disciplinary team management of children with chronic illness is also illustrated. Having the young person and family as partners within the team is essential; use of management plans reinforces this partnership and allows care to be delivered in a structured way.     

Nurse supplementary prescribing for patients with diabetes: a national questionnaire survey

Aims and objectives. To examine the prescribing practices of nurse supplementary prescribing in diabetes. Background. Nurses in several roles are involved in the management of medicines for patients with diabetes. Nurse prescribing should help optimise these roles. Nurses in the UK have virtually the same independent prescribing rights as doctors. There is little or no evidence on the extent to which nurse supplementary prescribing is used, or the impact and activity of nurse supplementary prescribing for patients with diabetes. Design. Survey. Method. A random sample of 214 nurse supplementary prescribers self‐completed a written questionnaire. Results. The majority of nurses held an academic qualification at degree level or higher, had a wealth of clinical experience, worked full‐time, were based in primary care and worked in general practice. The majority of nurses prescribed between one and five items a week. Oral anti‐diabetic drugs, hypertension and lipid‐regulating drugs and insulins were the products most often prescribed. Over 85% had undertaken specialist training in diabetes prior to undertaking the prescribing programme. Conclusion. Supplementary prescribing provides a practical and useful framework within which to prescribe medicines for patients with diabetes and its associated complications. Specialist diabetes training is a necessary prerequisite for nurses prescribing in this area. It is evident that there is still a place for supplementary prescribing. Implications for clinical practice. ? Recent legislative changes mean that nurses can now independently prescribe practically any drug. ? Nurses in general practice appear to prescribe most frequently as a nurse supplementary prescriber for patients with diabetes. ? Nurse supplementary prescribers are likely to use this mode of prescribing to deliver medicines to patients with diabetes. ? Over two‐thirds prescribe for common but serious complications of diabetes, e.g. hypertension, hyperlipidaemia and cardiovascular disease     

The role of inter-professional relationships and support for nurse prescribing in acute and chronic pain

Title.  The role of inter-professional relationships and support for nurse prescribing in acute and chronic pain.
Aim.  This paper is a report of a study to explore nurse prescribers' views on the role of inter-professional relationships and other means of support for nurse prescribing for patients in acute and chronic pain.
Background.  Research indicates that good team relationships are important for supporting nurse prescribing but that poor understanding of the role by other healthcare professionals can act as a barrier. While collaborative working is central to the role of pain nurses, there is a lack of research on the impact of nurse prescribing on inter-professional working or the support needs of these nurses.
Method.  A qualitative approach was adopted using thematic analysis of semi-structured interview data collected during 2006 and 2007. Participants were 26 nurses who prescribed medicines for patients with acute and/or chronic pain.
Findings.  Nurses' believed that prescribing encouraged collaborative working and sharing of knowledge across professional boundaries and that this helped to broaden understanding of the wider remit of pain management. Collaboration with doctors served a number of functions, including support and continuous learning. Barriers to effective nurse prescribing were a lack of understanding of its role amongst healthcare professionals and inadequate support. Formal support structures, such as regular clinical supervision, were seen as crucial to meeting nurses' ongoing learning.
Conclusion.  Factors that promote understanding of nurse prescribing and support inter-professional relationships are likely to have a positive impact on the effectiveness of nurse prescribing. A more consistent approach is required within organisations to support nurse prescribing.