The effect of ranitidine and cimetidine on single-dose diltiazem pharmacokinetics

The effects of two histamine 2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of diltiazem were studied in 6 healthy subjects. A single 60-mg oral dose of diltiazem was administered alone, after ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for 7 days, and after cimetidine 300 mg 4 times a day for 7 days. Plasma samples were obtained over a 10-hour period and analyzed for the parent drug and one of its metabolites, deacetyldiltiazem (DAD). Concurrent cimetidine produced a significant (p less than 0.05) increase in diltiazem levels at most time points, in peak concentration and area under the concentration-time curve. These variables were also increased during concurrent ranitidine administration but did not reach statistical significance. The DAD plasma concentration was below measurable levels during the control phase but increased during concurrent cimetidine and ranitidine administration. Caution should be exercised when diltiazem is administered concurrently with cimetidine and possibly, ranitidine.     

Lack of effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of sustained-release bupropion

The objective of this study was to assess whether cimetidine affects the pharmacokinetics of sustained-release (SR) bupropion hydrochloride and the active metabolite, hydroxybupropion. This randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy volunteers 18 to 45 years of age. ANOVA showed that administration of two 150 mg bupropion SR tablets with one 800 mg cimetidine tablet following an overnight fast did not change values for AUC infinity, Cmax, tmax, t1/2, and CL/F (CL/F calculated for bupropion only) for either bupropion or hydroxybupropion as compared with two 150 mg bupropion SR tablets alone. In this study, it appears that there is no effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of bupropion SR.     

The effect of cimetidine or omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram in healthy subjects

AIMS: To investigate the effects of co-administration of cimetidine or omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of escitalopram. METHODS: Two randomized placebo-controlled crossover studies were carried out. Sixteen healthy subjects were administered placebo, or cimetidine (400 mg twice daily) for 5 days (study 1) or omeprazole (30 mg once daily) for 6 days (study 2). On day 4 (study 1) or day 5 (study 2), a single dose of escitalopram (20 mg) was administered. Blood samples were taken at predetermined times for the measurement of serum concentrations of escitalopram and its demethylated metabolite (S-DCT). Treatment-emergent adverse events were also monitored. RESULTS: Co-administration with cimetidine caused a moderate increase in the systemic exposure [AUC0, infinity] to escitalopram (geometric mean ratio = 1.72, [95% CI 1.34, 2.21]) and a small increase in t(1/2) from 23.7 to 29.0 h (5.24 h [3.75, 6.70]). Co-administration with omeprazole also resulted in a moderate increase in the escitalopram AUC(0, infinity) (1.51 [1.39, 1.64]) and a small increase in t(1/2) from 26.5 to 34.8 h (8.3 h [6.44, 10.2]). There was no significant change in S-DCT AUC0, infinity after co-administration of either cimetidine or omeprazole. Co-administration of cimetidine or omeprazole had no effect on the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the good tolerability of escitalopram, the pharmacokinetic changes observed on co-administration with cimetidine or omeprazole are unlikely to be of clinical concern.     

The effect of cimetidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in humans

Objective: The interaction of multiple oral doses of cimetidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin was investigated in six healthy male volunteers. Methods: The subjects were given individually adjusted doses of warfarin to achieve therapeutic levels of prothrombin activity. The established daily maintenance oral dose of warfarin was kept stable throughout the trial and, on study days 8–14, each volunteer received a 800-mg daily dose of cimetidine. The degree of anticoagulant response produced by warfarin was quantified by the determination of both the prothrombin time and factor-VII clotting activity. Results: Cimetidine co-administration had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of the more potent S-warfarin but significantly increased by 28% (P < 0.05) mean R-warfarin trough plasma concentrations and decreased by 23% (P < 0.05) mean R-warfarin apparent clearance. Both prothrombin time and factor-VII clotting activity displayed considerable inter-subject variability and were not significantly affected by concurrent cimetidine treatment. The reduction of apparent clearance of R-warfarin by cimetidine was found to be the effect of inhibition of the formation of warfarin metabolites as determined by apparent formation clearance values (±SD) of R-6-hydroxywarfarin (31.1 ± 7.4 ml/h baseline; 18.5 ± 4.5 ml/h at end of cimetidine treatment; P < 0.01), and R-7-hydroxywarfarin (6.9 ± 1.3 ml/h baseline; 4.3 ± 1.1 ml/h at end of cimetidine treatment; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Cimetidine stereoselectively affects the steady-state pharmacokinetics of warfarin by inhibiting the disposition of the less potent R-warfarin in humans. However, this interaction is likely to be of minimal clinical significance in most patients. Received: 11 December 1998 / Accepted in revised form: 17 March 1999     

The paradoxical effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on glibenclamide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

The potential interactions between H2-receptor antagonists, cimetidine and ranitidine, and glibenclamide were studied in 15 non-smoking male volunteers. The study consisted of six treatment phases. Treatment A (3 h oral glucose tolerance test) consisted of 75 g dextrose in 300 ml carbonated water. Treatment B consisted of one 5 mg tablet of glibenclamide in addition to a glucose tolerance test. Treatment C, cimetidine 300 mg orally four times daily for 4 days and Treatment D, ranitidine 150 mg orally twice daily for 4 days were administered in a randomized, crossover fashion. On day 3 of Treatments C and D, subjects received an oral glucose tolerance test. On day 4 of Treatments C and D, subjects received 5 mg of glibenclamide in addition to cimetidine (Treatment E) or ranitidine (Treatment F) and an oral glucose tolerance test. Compared with the control treatment, cimetidine increased the glibenclamide AUC (973 vs 710 ng ml-1 h), but during ranitidine dosing glibenclamide AUC (726 ng ml-1 h) was not significantly different from the control. Apparent oral glibenclamide clearance decreased from 8.25 l h-1 under the control treatment to 6.0 l h-1 following cimetidine but was unchanged during ranitidine (7.97 l h-1). Plasma glucose concentrations were unexpectedly higher when glibenclamide was administered with cimetidine or ranitidine (glucose AUC 237 mg dl-1 h, 228 mg dl-1 h) when compared with glibenclamide administered alone (195 mg dl-1 h, P less than 0.0001). Plasma insulin concentrations were significantly elevated when H2-receptor antagonists and glibenclamide were administered concurrently.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of cimetidine on the single dose pharmacokinetics of oral clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam.

The effect of cimetidine on the single dose pharmacokinetics of orally administered clobazam and N-desmethylclobazam (NDMC) was studied in volunteers. Cimetidine inhibited the elimination of both clobazam and NDMC and inhibited the rate of formation of NDMC from clobazam. The increase in the AUC for NDMC generated from clobazam was relatively greater than that for clobazam itself. This suggests that NDMC elimination is inhibited to a relatively greater extent than clobazam elimination. The increase in AUC for NDMC generated from clobazam was also relatively greater than that for NDMC administered orally. This would suggest that cimetidine either increases the bioavailability of clobazam or reduces that of NDMC. The increases in the AUC for NDMC and for clobazam in some individuals was of a magnitude which is likely to be clinically significant.     

西咪替丁对甲硝唑唾液药物动力学的影响

８名健康志愿者口服单剂量０．６ｇ甲硝唑，次日开始连服６ｄ西咪替丁０．４ｇ，ｂｉｄ，第７ｄ再次口服同量甲硝唑。以高效液相色谱（ＨＰＬＣ）法测定收集的甲硝唑唾液浓度，用３Ｐ８７软件计算药动学参数。结果表明，单用甲硝唑组与西咪替丁＋甲硝唑组药－时曲线均符合一室模型。合用组的消除半衰期（Ｔ１／２Ｋｅ＝３．１ｈ）；较单用组（７．０ｈ）为短，差异非常显著（Ｐ＜０．０１）。合用组的ＡＵＣ（６５ｍｇ·ｈ·Ｌ－１）也较单用组（１１８ｍｇ·ｈ·Ｌ－１）为小，差异显著（Ｐ＜０．０５）。Ｃｍａｘ两组接近。     

The effect of repeat dosing with cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous granisetron in healthy volunteers

The primary route of elimination of granisetron is by oxidative hepatic metabolism, thus its pharmacokinetic profile may be altered by co-administration of other drugs that inhibit or induce hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes. This open-label study investigated the effect of inhibition of cimetidine, a potent inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, on the pharmacokinetic profile of intravenous granisetron in healthy male volunteers. Subjects (n = 12; 18-60 years) received granisetron (40 microg kg(-1)) infused over 3 min, six days before and on the eighth day of dosing with cimetidine (200 mg, four times a day). Blood samples were taken for pharmacokinetic analysis at intervals over 48 h following the administration of each dose of granisetron. Clinical chemistry, haematology and urinalysis were performed before, and 24 h after, each infusion. Electrocardiogram (ECG), resting blood pressure (BP) and pulse were monitored. There were no significant changes in the ECG, lead II trace or ECG time intervals, pulse or blood pressure on each study day. Minor falls in pulse rate and BP (likely to be related to recumbent posture) were seen during both granisetron dosing days, lasting 2 h after each infusion. No significant changes were apparent in the clinical chemistry, haematology or urinalysis measurements following granisetron dosing. No pharmacokinetic parameters measured after cimetidine administration were significantly different from those taken before. Adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity and were similar to those reported in other studies with granisetron. The pharmacokinetics of granisetron, when administered as a single dose, appeared to be unaltered by cimetidine, an inhibitor of multiple hepatic enzymes (CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4). Granisetron was equally well tolerated before and after repeated dosing with cimetidine.     

The influence of cimetidine versus ranitidine on doxepin pharmacokinetics

Summary The effect of cimetidine and ranitidine on doxepin pharmacokinetics was studied in 6 healthy volunteers. Each subject completed 3 study phases: Treatment A, 9 consecutive doses of 50 mg doxepin (once daily); Treatment B, same as Treatment A but co-administration of cimetidine 600 mg b.i.d. starting after the sixth doxepin dose and continuing until approximately 2 days following discontinuation of doxepin administration; Treatment C, identical to Treatment B but with ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. instead of cimetidine. Unlike ranitidine, cimetidine co-administration resulted in a significant increase in steady state plasma levels of doxepin (4.7, 9.0 and 4.5 ng/ml during Treatments A, B and C respectively) but not desmethyldoxepin (4.1, 4.6 and 4.2 ng/ml during Treatments A, B and C respectively). Elimination half-lives of doxepin and desmethyldoxepin were prolonged by cimetidine co-administration (19.6 and 26.2 h respectively), but remained unchanged during the ranitidine treatment phase (13.3 and 18.4 h) as compared to the control phase i.e. Treatment A (13.2 and 19.0 h). These results show that cimetidine, unlike ranitidine, significantly inhibits the biotransformation of doxepin. This data has clinical implications when the co-administration of tricylic antidepressants and H₂-receptor antagonists are indicated.     

Effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline

1. The effect of the therapeutic doses of cimetidine (400 mg/twice daily) on theophylline metabolism in Jordanian volunteers was studied. 2. The administration of the above therapeutic cimetidine dose did not alter theophylline clearance and elimination half-life. 3. Cimetidine administration also failed to alter the elimination of theophylline metabolites in urine.     

The influence of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil.

The influence of cimetidine pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has been studied in 15 ambulant patients with carcinoma. Neither pretreatment with a single dose of cimetidine (400 mg) nor with daily treatment at 1000 mg for 1 week altered 5FU pharmacokinetics. Pretreatment with cimetidine for 4 weeks (1000 mg daily) led to increased peak plasma concentrations of 5FU and also area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). The peak plasma concentration after oral 5FU was increased by 74% from 18.7 +/- 4.5 micrograms/ml (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 32.6 +/- 4.4 micrograms/ml (P less than 0.05) and AUC was increased by 72% from 528 +/- 133 micrograms/ml-1 min (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 911 +/- 152 micrograms ml-1 min (P less than 0.05). After intravenous 5FU, AUC was increased by 27% from 977 +/- 96 micrograms ml-1 min (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 1353 +/- 124 micrograms ml-1 min (P less than 0.01). Total body clearance for 5FU following intravenous administration was decreased by 28% from 987 +/- 116 ml/min (mean +/- s.e. mean) to 711 +/- 87 ml/min (P less than 0.01). The elimination half-life of 5FU was not altered by cimetidine. The basis of the interaction between 5FU and cimetidine is uncertain but probably a combination of inhibited drug metabolism and reduced liver blood flow. The therapeutic implications are considerable and additional care should be taken in patients receiving the two drugs concomitantly.     

The effect of cimetidine on basal gastric acid secretion in the rat.

1. The effect of cimetidine on the basal gastric acid secretion of the rat has been investigated in an anaesthetized lumen-perfused preparation. 2. Six rats previously given large doses of cimetidine orally showed no significant difference in basal gastric acid secretion when compared with six control rats. 3. Intravenous administration of 1 mg and 8 mg of cimetidine failed to inhibit significantly basal gastric acid secretion. 4. Although rats with a basal gastric acid secretion above 2.5 micro Eq/10 min. showed a consistent small reduction in basal gastric acid secretion after intravenous cimetidine, this was not seen in rats with a basal gastric acid secretion below 2.5 micro Eq/10 min. 5. THese results contrast sharply with the pronounced inhibition of basal gastric acid secretion by cimetidine in man and the possible reasons for this are discussed. 6. The results are also contrasted with previous work on gastric fistula rats which showed higher basal gastric acid secretion and significant inhibition by cimetidine.     

Lack of effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine in healthy subjects.

1. The possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction between the H2-receptor antagonist cimetidine and the long-acting local anaesthetic agent bupivacaine was studied in seven healthy, non-smoking volunteers. 2. The study consisted of two sessions at a minimum interval of 4 days. In a randomized, crossover fashion, the volunteers received bupivacaine HCl 1.4 mg kg-1 by i.m. injection at two occasions, once after no premedication, and once after two oral doses of 400 mg cimetidine. The concentrations of bupivacaine and its metabolites, 4'-hydroxybupivacaine and desbutylbupivacaine, were assayed by h.p.l.c., in serum up to 8 h and in urine fractions up to 24 h. 3. No influence of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine or on the serum cumulation of urinary recovery of its measured metabolites was detected. 4. These data suggest that cimetidine may be used safely as a premedication before local anaesthetic procedures with bupivacaine.     

Comparative study of the effect of famotidine and cimetidine on antipyrine pharmacokinetics in the human

In a randomized order the pharmacokinetics of antipyrine were studied following a 5 days treatment period with placebo, 1000 mg cimetidine and 40 mg famotidine daily, respectively in 7 healthy volunteers. In contrast to cimetidine, famotidine did not significantly affect the disposition of antipyrine in these subjects. Famotidine like the other guanidino-thiazole containing compound tiotidine appears to be free from this unwanted effect on drug metabolism in the liver.     

The effects of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of cifenline.

Twelve healthy subjects completed an open single dose study to evaluate the effect of co-administration of cimetidine and ranitidine on the pharmacokinetics of cifenline. Each subject received a single 160 mg dose of cifenline alone, in combination with cimetidine (300 mg four times daily), and with ranitidine (150 mg twice daily). The H2-receptor antagonists were given with breakfast 1 h prior to cifenline dosing and continuing for 48 h. Co-administration of cimetidine significantly increased Cmax (27%) and AUC (44%) and prolonged the half-life (30%) of cifenline. There were no differences in these parameters when ranitidine was co-administered with cifenline. The results of this study suggest that cimetidine, but not ranitidine, lowers the clearance of cifenline by inhibition of hepatic oxidative metabolism.     

Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of cimetidine

Summary The inhibition of serotonin uptake by platelets has been measured in blood from 20 patients on amitriptyline (50–225 mg daily), 14 patients on clomipramine (25–200 mg daily), and in an untreated group of 21 depressed patients. A complete kinetic analysis was carried out in each patient. Using the increase in the kinetic parameter K_m as a measure of uptake inhibition, there was a high correlation between the daily dose and inhibition within each drug group, clomipramine being about 10 times more potent than amitriptyline. The inhibition did not vary with age, sex, duration of treatment (up to 3 years), or concomitant use of moderate doses of benzodiazepines, neuroleptics or lithium. In the amitriptyline group the inhibition was significantly smaller in smokers than in non-smokers. The kinetic parameter V_max was essentially unchanged in the amitriptyline group, and was markedly reduced in the clomipramine group, but without any correlation with dose. The mixed competitive-noncompetitive effect of clomipramine confirms previous in vitro findings.