Prevalence of non-A non-B hepatitis and anti-HCV antibodies in a Portuguese dialysis population.

Non-A Non-B hepatitis (NANBH) is nowadays one of the most common causes of hepatic dysfunction in dialysis patients. We reviewed the records of 231 HBsAg-negative patients in our unit and found 119 patients with biochemical criteria of NANBH (51.5%), 88 of them (68.9%) with circulating antibodies against HCV (chi 2 P less than 0.0001). Such high prevalence of NANBH was due to an outbreak of NANBH in the late 70s and early 80s. Time on haemodialysis (HD) was the major risk factor of NANBH in this population, and no other risk factors were identified. Prevalence of anti-HCV was similar to reports from non-uraemic populations. Anti-HCV seems to be a reliable test to confirm NANBH, but not better than using common biochemical criteria of NANBH to manage these patients in dialysis units.     

Antibody responses to hepatitis C virus and its modes of transmission in dialysis patients.

Five of 72 patients dialysed at the same dialysis unit developed elevated alanine aminotranspherase (ALT) levels attributed to acute non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). Histopathologic findings consistent with NANBH were present in four of them. Serological screening for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was performed in all 72 cases. Three of the patients with NANBH and 2 of the other 67 patients had positive tests. Low and transient levels of anti-HCV were noted in 2 patients with NANBH in spite of chronic hepatitis. Only 1 of 5 patients with NANBH was known to have had blood transfusions indicating other, as yet undefined, modes of transmission of HCV for the others. Although antibody responses to HCV might be transient or low, testing for anti-HCV should be considered in dialysis populations.     

Hepatitis C in renal transplant recipients

Sera from 130 renal transplant recipients were tested for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). Anti-HCV was detected in 6.2% of patients: 15.4% of patients who had maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and 2.2% of those who had continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) before transplantation (P less than 0.05). The similarity in prevalence of anti-HCV with patients currently on dialysis and the absence of transfusion during posttransplant follow-up suggest that most patients acquired HCV infection through transfusion during dialysis. The proportion of anti-HCV-positive patients who had one or more episodes of elevation in serum transaminase level was similar to that of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients, 75% vs. 72.2%. However, anti-HCV was only detected in 25% of HBsAg-negative patients who had recurrent elevations in serum transaminase level. It is not clear whether the low prevalence of anti-HCV in these patients is related to the presence of other non-A, non-B hepatitis virus (es) or a decrease in titer of anti-HCV secondary to immunosuppression posttransplantation.     

Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in the hemodialysis unit.

An enzyme immunoassay was used to detect antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 261 patients and 69 staff members of a hemodialysis unit. The prevalence of anti-HCV was 46.7% in patients and 2.9% in staff members (p less than 0.001). The prevalence of anti-HCV increased significantly with increasing duration of hemodialysis (p less than 0.001), but was not related to age, sex, history of blood transfusion, status of hepatitis B or hepatitis A virus infection, or serum ALT. Patients with hepatitis episode increased with increasing duration of hemodialysis and showed a significantly higher prevalence of anti-HCV than those without (63.1 vs. 34.7%, p less than 0.001). The prevalence of anti-HCV in patients with hepatitis also increased with increasing duration of hemodialysis (p = 0.05). Thus, HCV appears to be the major cause of hepatitis in hemodialysis patients. Besides strict infection control measures, further studies are needed to determine the mode of HCV infection and its prevention in the hemodialysis unit.     

Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Dialysis: A Continuing Problem

Patients on chronic dialysis are at increased risk of acquiring parenterally transmitted hepatitis viruses from blood product transfusions or nosocomial transmission in hemodialysis units, and biochemical abnormalities in liver function are seen in 10–44% of patients on chronic hemodialysis. In the past, hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the major cause of parenterally transmitted viral hepatitis in dialysis patients, and the remaining cases were attributed to non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH). The discovery of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has shed light on the cause and clinical course of NANBH in patients on dialysis. The current debate is focused on strategies to reduce the transmission of HCV among dialysis patients and to lessen the consequences of liver disease among patients already infected.     

Infection of hepatitis C virus in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis therapy and staff members]

The prevalence of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was determined in 564 patients and 145 staff members of nine hemodialysis (HD) units in Nagano Prefecture using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on the C 100 HCV antigen (the first generation anti-HCV assay). And also serum HBV markers were tested in these subjects. One hundred patients (18%) were anti-C100 HCV positive, indicating that this figure represents a much higher prevalence than that (0.9%) among general population in the same geographical area. Out of 141 patients without history of blood transfusion, 17 (12%) were positive for anti-C 100 HCV, suggesting that blood-transfusions-unrelated acquisition of HCV infection can occur. Anti-HCV prevalence correlated with both the blood units transfused and the duration of HD treatment. There was a significant difference in the prevalence of anti-C 100 HCV in individual dialysis units ranging from 0% to 53%. In the dialysis unit with prevalence of 53%, approximately half of the anti-HCV positive patients were found to have chronic liver disease. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers among HD patients, on the other hand, was 36% (202/564). Fifty one (51%) of 100 anti-C 100 HCV positive patients and 151 (33%) of 464 anti-C 100 HCV negative patients were positive for HBV markers, with significant difference in HBV infection rate between the 2 groups. The prevalence of chronic liver disease, defined as abnormal serum transaminase levels for more than 6 months was significantly higher in anti-HCV positive patients than in anti-HCV negative ones (39% vs 10%, p less than 0.05), suggesting that HCV infection may contribute to chronic liver disease in HD patients. Among 145 staff members, only 3 (2%) were positive for anti-HCV, whereas 25 (17%) were positive for hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), indicating prior HBV infection. With applying the second generation anti-HCV assay, which can detect antibodies to both capsid and nonstructural products of HCV gene, anti-HCV prevalence increased by two times in HD patients, but didn't change in HD staff members.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Hepatitis C infection in two urban hemodialysis units

We determined the prevalence of antibodies to the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) in 90 patients and 37 staff members of two hemodialysis units utilizing a recently developed anti-HCV recombinant based assay. Eleven patients (12%) were anti-HCV(+). Of these, eight (73%) had antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) indicating prior hepatitis B infection; one patient was hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(+). All staff members were anti-HCV(-), although seven (19%) of them were anti-HBc(+). Alanine aminotransferase elevations were present at the time of the study in four anti-HCV(-) patients and in only one anti-HCV(+) patient. All anti-HCV(+) (mean 59 +/- 74; range 3 to 269 units) and 85% of anti-HCV(-) patients (mean 16 +/- 27; range 0 to 204 units) had received multiple blood transfusions (P = 0.348). Among 50 patients tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 43% of anti-HCV(+) as compared to only 7% anti-HCV(-) were positive (P = 0.003). There was a history of intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) in eight (72%) of the anti-HCV(+) patients and in only seven (9%) of the anti-HCV(-) group (P = 0.00001). The results of this serologic survey suggests that anti-HCV positivity is prevalent, although much less than anti-HBc, among our dialysis patients, whereas it was not detected among staff members. The prevalence rate of anti-HCV was statistically significantly higher among anti-HIV(+) and IVDA patients but not in multi-transfused patients.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. Of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P =0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

Prevalence and incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in hemodialysis patients: study of risk factors.

The prevalence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV) was assessed in 246 hemodialysis patients who attended a dialysis unit in Bari, using a recombinant enzyme immunoassay test (Abbot Lab.). Fifty-six (22.8%) sera were reactive to anti-HCV. The reactivity was confirmed in 46 specimens (18.7%) using the Abbott EIA HCV neutralization test. The anti-HCV prevalence was higher in males than in females and increased with age, duration of dialysis and number of transfusions. Moreover, a correlation between the presence of anti-HCV and the persistent increase of ALT was noted. The HCV-infection attack rate was calculated using the frozen sera collected from 1984 to 1990: the incidence of infection in the first year was 6.1%, and in following years 4.6%, 4.9%, 3.1%, 2.1% and 2.2%, respectively.     

Hepatitis C virus in chronic hemodialysis patients with non-A, non-B hepatitis.

Sixteen of 110 hemodialysis (HD) patients fulfilling criteria of non-A, non B hepatitis (NANBH), i.e. alanine aminotransferase (ALT) greater than 50 U/ml in the absence of both serologic markers for acute HBV and HAV infections and clinical evidence of another cause of hepatitis, were tested for the presence of antibodies against hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) by enzyme immunoassay (Ortho, Diagnostics). All (100%) were anti-HCV-positive. There were 5 patients with a monophasic (M) rise pattern (1 or 2 ALT rises), and 11 cases demonstrated a polyphasic (P) rise elevation pattern (more than 2). The mean ALT value of the M group was 202.3 +/- 209 U/ml and that of the P group was 116.6 +/- 39.1 U/ml. The patients received a mean of 19.1 +/- 16.2 units of packed red cells during the follow-up period (69.9 months). Only 1 patient received no blood transfusion. Six patients had a past HBV infection and 3 became HIV-infected in the course of this study. The high rate of infection of hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus in our setting points to the need for improved control measures.     

Hepatitis C virus antibodies in patients with liver disease. The western Cape experience.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a recently characterised non-A, non-B hepatitis (NANBH) agent, which appears to be important in both parenteral and sporadic NANBH. HCV infection has been associated with the development of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatoma. Groups of patients in the western Cape with chronic liver disease and hepatoma were screened for antibodies to HCV and the results were confirmed by standard neutralisation tests. Three of 19 patients with cirrhosis secondary to alcohol abuse or classic auto-immune chronic active hepatitis were considered to have antibodies to HCV at initial screening. All of these were false-positive results. Five of 20 patients with presumptive chronic NANBH were considered possibly to have antibodies to HCV. Only 1 patient with post-transfusional NANBH was confirmed to have specific HCV antibodies. Two of 30 patients with hepatoma had specific anti-HCV antibodies in contrast to 11 others with serum HBsAg positivity. One hundred blood transfusion donors and 25 antenatal patients were tested concurrently and shown to be negative for anti-HCV. Specific antibodies to HCV were present in very few patients with cirrhosis, presumptive NANBH and hepatoma tested in this local survey. False-positive reactions appeared to occur at a higher rate than true-positive results.     

Prevalence of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients.

Due to frequent parenteral contact with blood transfusions hemodialysis patients are prone to acquire hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. To determine the role of HCV infection we investigated the prevalence of antibodies to HCV in 188 hemodialysis patients. The prevalence of antibodies to HCV was 7.4%. As compared to anti-HCV-negative patients, anti-HCV-positive patients had slightly elevated transaminases which were independent of the presence of markers for hepatitis B virus infection. We conclude that HCV infection is common among dialysis patients.     

Environmental Transmission of Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Viruses Within the Hemodialysis Unit

Abstract: The hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted in the dialysis setting through blood transfusions and environmental surfaces. Transfusion related hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very well known, but only recently the environmental transmission of this virus was postulated. In order to study the prevalence, mechanisms of transmission, and the ALT patterns of HBV and HCV infections in hemodialysis and CAPD patients before the implementation of HBV vaccination and HCV screening in the blood bank, we conducted a study from January 1987 to January 1990. Sera from 185 hemodialysis and 124 CAPD patients were stored in this period and later analyzed for HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and anti-HCV (second generation ELISA). The prevalence of any HBV marker was 55.7% (103/185) for hemodialysis patients and 31.5% (39/124) for CAPD patients (hemodialysis vs. CAPD, p < 0.001). The prevalence of positive anti-HCV was 35.1% (65/185) for hemodialysis and 33.9% (42/124) for CAPD patients (not significant). There was a significant association between HBV markers positivity and anti-HCV positivity. The multivariate analysis of risk factors revealed an association of the positivity of each virus with the duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT), number of previous blood transfusions, and past history of hemodialysis treatment. Thus, besides the transfusion-related transmission, hemodialysis environmental transmission may also occur for both viruses. The findings of a high prevalence of both viruses and evidence for environmental transmission in the dialysis setting are of major importance for the planning of future preventive measures.     

Hepatitis C: reality of a renal unit.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) seems to be the most important agent of non-A, non-B hepatitis. This study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of hepatitis C in our renal unit. Twelve patients (29%) had antibodies against HCV (anti-HCV). Seropositive patients were on hemodialysis for a longer period than seronegatives. Statistically significant associations with anti-HCV were: blood transfusions, at least 1 episode of elevated value of transaminases (2-fold) and fluctuations of transaminases. Our findings confirm the high prevalence of anti-HCV in hemodialyzed patients, the importance of parenteral transmission and the high probability of liver disease in anti-HCV-positive patients.     

Prevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in haemodialysis patients

SUMMARY: The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B exposure and antibodies against the hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was assessed in 86 haemodialysis patients at the National Kidney and Transplant Institute (NKTI) using the commercial radioimmunoassay and ortho HCV ELISA assay. of the 86 patients included in the study, 42 were male with a mean age of 44.9 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.4 years. Forty-four were female with a mean age of 48.4 years and a mean duration of dialysis of 2.3 years. Hepatitis B exposure was 57% and 12.8% of haemodialysis patients were positive for HBsAg, whereas 39.8% of patients were positive for anti-HCV. There was a significant correlation ( P = 0.00007) between anti-HCV positivity and the length of time on haemodialysis. However, there was no significant correlation found between the number of blood transfusions received and anti-HCV positivity. There was also no significant correlation found between HBsAg and antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) positivity and the number of blood transfusions or the length of time on haemodialysis, nor between hepatitis B and C exposure and elevated aminotransferase levels.     

Occult HBV Infection in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Patients

Aim. Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the liver and/or blood in the absence of detectable serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag). There is a high prevalence of occult HBV infection in dialysis patients. This study investigated the prevalence of occult HBV infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients and compared the prevalence of occult HBV infection in dialysis patients either with or without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.?Methods.?In this cross-sectional study, 71 CAPD patients and 71 HD patients were evaluated. HBV DNA testing was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We recorded general characteristics of the patients, duration of dialysis, HBs Ag, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), anti-HCV antibody (anti-HCV), HCV RNA, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase levels (AST).?Results.?Twelve (16.9%) of the 71 HD patients and seven (9.8%) of the 71 CAPD patients were HBV DNA-positive. A statistically significant difference was not observed in the groups. Anti-HCV was negative and AST and ALT levels were normal in all of the HBV-DNA positive patients. Viral loads were low in both groups. Conclusion. This is the first study that analyzes occult HBV prevalence in CAPD patients. We conclude that the prevalence of the occult HBV may be common in CAPD patients as in HD patients, and HCV positivity is not a contributing factor to occult HBV infection in dialysis patients.     

Prevalence of hepatitis C infection in a hemodialysis unit.

To define the prevalence of NANB hepatitis, anti-HCV antibodies were determined in 51 patients on renal replacement therapy, in 7 transplanted patients and 17 staff members of the hemodialysis unit. Anti-HCV antibodies were evaluated using immunoenzymatic methods (Ortho HCV ELISA Test System, 1st and 2nd generation). Among hemodialysis patients, seroconversion was respectively documented in 17.6% (9/51) and 52.9% (27/51); none of the transplanted patients were positive with the 1st generation test, while 3/7 were positive with the 2nd. No statistically significant difference was found in the prevalence antibodies between transfused and nontransfused patients. ALT levels were statistically greater in patients with anti-HCV antibodies (X2 2nd generation = 8.83; p less than 0.01). Our results suggest: (1) that hemodialysis represents a risk factor; (2) the validity of substitute markers and (3) more sensitivity of the 2nd than 1st generation test.     

Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis B or C virus infection and non-hemodialysis patients with hepatitis cirrhosis

AIMS: To investigate the relation of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis (HD) patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 86 HD patients with hepatitis B surface antigen-negative and hepatitis C antibody-negative, 28 HD patients with hepatitis C antibody-positive, 22 HD patients with hepatitis B surface antigen-positive, 78 non-HD patients with hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis and 38 non-hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C-induced liver cirrhosis. The following parameters were checked: anti-HCV, hepatitis B surface antigen, hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cells, platelets, calcium, phosphate, iron, ferritin, albumin, globulin, aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT) and C-reactive protein. The history of blood transfusions, medications, erythropoietin doses and adequate dialysis (KTNV) for 6 consecutive months was also recorded from charts. RESULTS: The HD patients with positive serum anti-HCV and non-HD patients with hepatitis B- or C-induced liver cirrhosis had higher prevalences of leukopenia (39.3%, 43.6% and 50% vs. 15.1%; p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (67.9%, 89.7% and 81.6% vs. 34.9%: p < 0.001) than HD patients with serum anti-HCV(-)HbsAg(-). The WBC (4,432 +/- 1,394, 4,792 +/- 2,263 and 4,624 2,446 vs. 5,590 +/- 1,500/mm3; p < 0.001) and platelet counts (140 +/- 45, 80 +/- 50 and 89 +/- 65 vs. 186 +/- 62 x 10(3)/mm3; p < 0.001) of HD patients with positive serum anti-HCV and non-HD patients with hepatitis B- or C-induced cirrhosis were also lower than HD patients without anti-HCV antibody. The liver cirrhosis patients had more thrombocytopenia than the HD patients with anti-HCV(+). The WBC and platelet counts did not vary between HD patients with HbsAg(+) and HD patients with anti-HCV(-)HBsAg(-). The durations of HD, hepatitis and liver cirrhosis were not related to the leukopenia or thrombocytopenia (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HCV infection associated with leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia in HD patients is as common as in non-HD patients with liver cirrhosis. This may be due to the direct effect of hemopoiesis rather than the hyperspleenism of liver cirrhosis patients. There is a need for further prospective investigation to ascertain the clinical significance of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia in HD patients with anti-HCV(+). The prevalence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was higher in HD patients with hepatitis C than in HD patients with hepatitis B and HD patient without hepatitis.     

血液透析患者丙型肝炎病毒标志检测

研究血透患者的丙型肝炎病毒感染。方法 在60倒尿毒症血透患者中,采用第二代酶联免疫法测定抗丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)抗体,同时采用套式多聚酶联反应(PCR)法测定HCV-RNA。结果 27例抗HCV-HgG阳性,24例抗HCV-IgM阳性,37例HCV-RNA阳性,总阳性率为63.3％;输血组的HCV感染率为69.6％,而非输血组HCV感染率仍高达42.9％;透析时间大于3年者,HCV的感染率达100％。结论 血透患者HCV感染是相当严重的,其中输血为HCV传染的主要途径,但可能还存在经透析装置等其它传播途径。     

TT virus infection in patients on peritoneal dialysis in Taiwan

Many studies have reported the prevalence of transfusion-transmitted virus (TTV) infection in hemodialysis patients, but few reports studied the prevalence of TTV infection in peritoneal dialysis patients. In this study, we determined the prevalence of TTV in a peritoneal dialysis population in Taiwan and related its prevalence with history of blood transfusion, serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), and serum aminotransferases (AST and ALT) levels. Serum samples from 47 peritoneal dialysis patients and a control group of 43 patients at health examination were studied for TTV viremia by using polymerase chain reaction. The rate of blood transfusion exposure (p < 0.0001), female gender (p = 0.001), younger age (p = 0.0014), and serum AST level (p = 0.012) were significantly higher in peritoneal dialysis patients. The prevalence of TTV viremia was not significantly different between peritoneal dialysis patients and the control group (23.4% vs. 37.2%). TTV infection was not associated with evident liver diseases in peritoneal dialysis patients, and the infection rate was not different between automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. There was no statistically significant association between TTV infection and age, gender, transfusion history, duration of peritoneal dialysis, AST level, ALT level, HBsAg, or anti-HCV seropositivity in peritoneal dialysis patients. Our results suggest that TTV infection is not associated with evident liver diseases, and there is no difference between TTV infection in healthy individuals and peritoneal dialysis patients. TTV transmission probably occurs via routes unrelated to peritoneal dialysis.