Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Stent-less Coronary Intervention Using Rotational Atherectomy and Drug-Coated Balloon in Patients with De Novo Lesions

ObjectivesWe investigated angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with de novo lesions undergoing rotational atherectomy (RA) followed by drug-coated balloon (DCB) dilation (RA/DCB).BackgroundImplantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) has been a mainstay of the interventional treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD); however, there still remain several DES-unsuitable clinical/lesion conditions. Nowadays DCB for de novo lesions has attracted more attention, and RA, which tends not to cause major dissection but to debulk intima, might be one of suitable pre-treatments before DCB.Methods and resultsThirty patients (34 lesions) undergoing RA/DCB for de novo lesions were enrolled. Clinical/lesion background included severe calcification, calcified nodule, inlet/outlet of aneurysm, ostial lesion, severe thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, and/or sequelae of Kawasaki disease. The largest burr size used was 1.83 ± 0.23 mm, and the mean DCB diameter was 2.71 ± 0.47 mm. Angiographic success was obtained in 94% of the lesions. No acute closure but 1 no reflow occurred. Repeat angiography (mean, 6.6 months after procedure) was performed for 19 lesions. Frequency of binary restenosis was 21.1%, and late lumen loss was 0.34 ± 0.30 mm. During a mean follow-up period of 13.1 months, 6 deaths (2 sudden deaths, 1 cardiac death, 3 non-cardiac deaths), 2 strokes, and 2 target lesion revascularizations were observed.ConclusionsStent-less PCI using RA/DCB might be an alternative revascularization therapy for CAD patients complicated with DES-unsuitable conditions.     

A Non-inferiority,Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Versus New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents on Angiographic Outcomes for Coronary De Novo Lesions

Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy - Drug-coated balloon (DCB) has been proved efficacy for coronary small vessel disease, but data regarding outcomes of DCB in common de novo lesions (including...     

Novel Insights of Jailed Balloon and Jailed Corsair Technique for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Bifurcation Lesions

BackgroundThe optimal technique for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a bifurcation lesion remains uncertain. JBT/JCT techniques are now emerging for protection of the side branch (SB). We aimed to compare jailed balloon (JBT) and jailed Corsair (JCT) techniques to the conventional jailed wire technique.MethodsWe analyzed 850 consecutive patients (995 bifurcation lesions), who underwent PCI. The bifurcation lesions were classified as jailed wire (?), jailed wire (+), JBT, and JCT. We assessed temporary thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade ≤2, permanent TIMI flow grade ≤2 in the SB, and SB occlusion related myocardial infarction and compared these endpoints with inverse probability treatment weighted analysis.ResultsThe percentage of each group is as follows: jailed wire (?); 44.7%; jailed wire (+) 50.9%; JBT 1.7%; JCT 2.7%. The Corsair could not be delivered with a stent because of severe calcifications (3.7%) and a jailed balloon was entrapped with the stent after dilatation (5.9%). Compared to the jailed wire (+), JBT/JCT had a higher percentage of true bifurcations, arterial sheath size ≥7 Fr, and a lower proportion of wire recrossing (all, P < 0.05). After adjustment, temporary and permanent TIMI flow grade ≤2 in the SB, and SB occlusion related myocardial infarction were not significantly different (OR: 1.08, CI: 0.32–3.71, P = 0.90; OR: 0.88, CI: 0.11–6.91, P = 0.91; OR: 1.94, CI: 0.23–16.5, P = 0.55 respectively).ConclusionsOur data could not prove the efficacy of JBT/JCT, but revealed novel insights about these techniques. A larger study is necessary to prove the efficacy of JBT/JCT.     

Impact of Acquired Thrombocytopenia on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAcquired thrombocytopenia (aTP) is associated with a high frequency of bleeding and ischemic complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Herein, we report a meta-analysis evaluating the adverse effects of aTP on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality post-PCI.MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and, clinicaltrials.gov from the inception of these databases through October 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) No Thrombocytopenia (nTP) and 2) Acquired Thrombocytopenia (aTP) after PCI. Primary endpoints were in-hospital, 30-day and all-cause mortality rates at the longest follow-up. The main summary estimate was random effects Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsSeven studies involving 57,247 participants were included. There was significantly increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (HR 10.73 [6.82–16.88]), MACE (HR 2.96 [2.24–3.94]), major bleeding (HR 4.78 [3.54–6.47]), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (HR 7.53 [2.8–20.2]), in the aTP group compared to the nTP group. Similarly, aTP group had a statistically significant increased incidence of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR 6.08), MACE (HR 2.77), post-PCI MI (HR 1.98), TVR (HR 5.2), and major bleeding (HR 12.73). Outcomes at longest follow-up showed increased incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 3.98 [1.53–10.33]) and MACE (HR 1.24 [0.99–1.54]) in aTP group, while there was no significant difference for post-PCI MI (HR 0.94 [0.37–2.39]) and TVR (HR 0.96 [0.69–1.32]) between both groups.ConclusionsAcquired Thrombocytopenia after PCI is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, adverse bleeding events and the need for in-hospital and 30-day TVR.     

Impact of Optimal Preparation Before Drug-Coated Balloon Dilatation for De Novo Lesion in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

BackgroundDrug eluting stent (DES) remain several problems, including stent thrombosis, stent fracture and neoatherosclerosis. Stent-less Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a drug coated balloon (DCB) is a stent-less strategy, and several trials have supported the efficacy of DCB. However, the optimal preparation before using DCB was uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the optimal preparation for plaque oppression/debulking before DCB dilatation for de novo coronary artery lesion.MethodsA total 936 patients were treated using DCB from 2014 to 2017 at our institution. Among them, we analyzed 247 patients who underwent PCI using DCB alone for de novo lesion. The primary end point of this study was target lesion failure (TLF).ResultsThe area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of % plaque area to predict TLF. ROC curve analysis revealed plaque area ≥ 58.5% (AUC, 0.81) were associated with TLF. Eligible 188 patients were divided into 2 groups (plaque area ≥ 58.5% [n = 38] and <58.5% [n = 150]) according to IVUS data before using DCB. TLF was significantly higher in plaque area ≥ 58.5% group than in <58.5% group (P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis selected plaque area ≥ 58.5% as an independent predictor of TLF (hazard ratio 7.59, P < 0.01).ConclusionsLesion preparation achieving plaque area < 58.5% was important in stent-less PCI using DCB.     

The Importance of Bifurcation Lesions in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BackgroundBifurcation lesions at the time of emergent PCI for STEMI are relatively common. However, there are little data regarding their significance. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of bifurcation lesions in the setting of emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsIn 391 patients who underwent primary and rescue PCI, the clinical characteristics, procedural success, and in-hospital cardiac events were compared retrospectively between the patients with and without bifurcation lesions. The PCI strategy was at the discretion of the operator.ResultsThe culprit artery involved a bifurcation lesion in 54/391 (14%) patients. The baseline clinical characteristics between the groups with and without bifurcation lesions were similar. The majority of bifurcation lesions (81%) were seen in the left anterior ascending (LAD) artery. All lesions were treated with the provisional stenting approach, and only 2 (3%) patients required 2 stents. There were no difference in the procedural success and the final TIMI-3 flow, but PCI of bifurcation lesion required higher amount of contrast use. There was no in-hospital MACE in the bifurcation group. The peak cardiac enzyme, left ventricular function, and length of stay were similar in these 2 groups.ConclusionsBifurcation lesions are relatively common in emergent PCI for STEMI involving the LAD. It can be safely treated with a provisional stenting approach, and the immediate outcome is similar to non-bifurcation lesions.     

Outcomes of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Analysis of National Inpatient Sample

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a prevalence of 15% of patients over 80 years. Coronary artery disease co-exists in 20–30% of patients with atrial fibrillation. The need for triple anticoagulation therapy makes the management of these patients challenging following PCI.MethodsNationwide inpatient sample which is a set of longitudinal hospital inpatient databases was used to evaluate the outcome of patients with AF who underwent PCI. All patients undergoing PCI between 2002 and 2011 were included in the study. Specific ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify the study patients and their outcomes.ResultsThere were 3,226,405 PCIs during the time period of the study of which 472,609 (14.6%) patients had AF. AF patients were older and predominantly male (60%). The number of PCIs had a declining trend from 2002 to 2011. Age adjusted inpatient mortality was significantly higher in PCI AF group compared to the PCI non-AF group (100.82 ± 9.03 vs 54.07 ± 8.96 per 100,000; P < 0.01). Post PCI predictors of mortality were AF (OR 1.56, CI 1.53–1.59), CKD (OR 1.41, CI 1.37–1.46), PAD (OR 1.20, CI 1.15–1.24), acute myocardial infarction (OR 2.42 CI 2.37–2.46 and cardiogenic shock (OR 13.92 CI 13.60–14.24) P < 0.001.ConclusionAF is common in patients undergoing PCI and those AF patients have a higher age-adjusted all cause inpatient mortality. There is a decline in total number of PCIs over time in US. Atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, MI and cardiogenic shock were associated with increased mortality following PCI.     

单纯药物涂层球囊策略治疗冠状动脉分叉病变分支血管的临床观察

目的观察单纯应用药物涂层球囊治疗冠状动脉分叉病变的安全性及有效性。方法入选我院心内科31例分叉病变患者(主支狭窄50%,分支开口狭窄70%;分支血管参考直径≥2mm),单纯应用药物涂层球囊处理分支血管,观察手术成功率、分支血管血流情况及并发症发生率,术后9个月行冠状动脉造影检查,记录随访过程中不良心血管事件(MACE)的发生情况。结果 31例患者33个分叉病变中位于前降支/对角支占57.58%,回旋支/钝缘支占30.30%,右冠状动脉/后降支或左室后支占12.12%。31例患者均成功完成分叉病变介入治疗,手术成功率100%,并且全部患者均经桡动脉途径完成。其中2列患者出现分支血管夹层(1例TIMI血流2级)进行补救性药物洗脱支架植入。围手术期及术后临床随访(门诊或电话随访),无死亡或心肌梗死等主要心脏不良事件发生。74.19%的患者完成了冠状动脉造影复查,仅1例行靶病变再次血运重建(TLR)。分支晚期管腔丢失(LLL)为(0.13±0.25)mm。结论单独药物涂层球囊策略处理冠状动脉分叉病变分支血管是安全有效的。     

Utility of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Type C Lesions

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex lesions (i.e., American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class type C) remains challenging and the outcome may be compromised. The use of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to guide PCI was suggested to improve outcome. Methods: A cohort of 1,984 patients who underwent PCI to type C lesions in our center from April 2000 to March 2010 was identified. Using propensity score matching with clinical and angiographic characteristics, we identified 637 patients who underwent IVUS guidance and 637 patients who had only angiographic guidance PCI. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite end-point of all-cause mortality, Q-wave myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization, were compared between the 2 groups. Results: After propensity score matching, baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were well matched. Patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI had less predilatation and more postdilatation, and were treated more often with cutting balloon. Final diameter stenosis was significantly smaller in the IVUS-guided group (3 ± 11% vs. 7 ± 19%, P < 0.001), resulting in higher angiographic success compared with the non-IVUS-guided group (97.9% vs. 94.8%, P < 0.001). The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the IVUS-guided group compared to the angiography-guided group (11.0% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.017) as was cardiac death (1.9% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.010). Conclusion: IVUS-guided PCI for complex type C lesions is associated with better outcome and should be considered for these lesions. (J Interven Cardiol 2012;25:452-459).     

Outcomes for Cancer Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background/PurposeThe incidence of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients is rising. The risk of in-hospital complications for cancer patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well defined.Methods/MaterialsA retrospective single-center cohort assessing STEMI patients with a history of cancer (n = 58) and without a history of cancer (n = 551) who underwent primary PCI between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2017 was conducted. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital complications including reinfarction, cardiogenic shock, new heart failure, stroke, new atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, cardiac arrest, bleeding, new dialysis requirement, mechanical circulatory support, hospice requirement, and in-hospital mortality.ResultsOverall in-hospital complications occurred in 229 (37.6%) patients. There was no significant difference in overall complications in patients with a history of cancer (39.7%), compared to those without a cancer history (37.4%) (adjusted OR 0.84 [0.46–1.51], p = 0.58; unadjusted OR 1.10 [0.61–1.92], p = 0.73); there were no differences exhibited in any of the individual complications. Patients with a history of cancer were significantly more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (12.7% vs. 5%; p = 0.03) and receive bare metal stents (50% vs. 30.4%; p = 0.004) as compared to patients without a history of cancer.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference for in-hospital complications in patients with a history of cancer and those without a history of cancer undergoing primary PCI for STEMI. Patients with a history of cancer were more likely to readmitted within 30 days and receive bare metal stents.SummaryThe risk of in-hospital complications for cancer patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI is not well defined. In a single-center retrospective cohort, there was no significant difference for in-hospital complications between patients with a history of cancer and those without a history of cancer undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.