Efficacy of a new coating material, PMEA, for cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in a porcine model

BACKGROUND: A new coating material, poly-2-methoxyethyl acrylate (PMEA), was developed to improve the biocompatibility of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits. METHODS: To investigate the efficacy of the PMEA coating for CPB circuits, we compared PMEA-coated circuits (group P, n = 6) with uncoated circuits (group C, n = 6) and heparin (covalent-bonded heparin, Hepaface)-coated circuits (group H, n = 6) in a porcine CPB model. RESULTS: Platelet counts were significantly preserved in groups P and H compared with those in group C (P versus C, p < 0.05). The plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex and bradykinin were significantly lower at 120 minutes in groups P and H than in group C (thrombin-antithrombin: P versus C, p < 0.05; bradykinin: P versus C, p < 0.05). The amount of fibrinogen adsorbed onto the hollow fibers was markedly less in group P than in groups C and H. CONCLUSIONS: The PMEA coating was equal to heparin coating in preventing reactions induced by CPB circuits, and might be superior to heparin coating in suppressing the adsorption of plasma proteins such as fibrinogen. Thus, PMEA coating may be a suitable means for improving the biocompatibility of CPB circuits.     

Biocompatibility of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in coronary patients with left ventricular dysfunction is superior to PMEA-coated circuits

BACKGROUND: Several coating techniques for extracorporeal circulation have been developed to diminish the systemic inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and biocompatibility of heparin-coated and poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated CPB circuits on coronary patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS: Thirty-six patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting were divided into two equal groups: group H (n = 18), heparin-coated; group P (n = 18), PMEA coated. Clinical outcomes, hematologic variables, cardiac enzymes, malondialdehyde (MDA), and acute phase inflammatory response (including myeloperoxidase (MPO), catalase, hsCRP, and IL-8) were analyzed perioperatively. RESULTS: Demographic, CPB, and clinical outcome data were similar for both groups. Plasma fibrinogen, total protein, albumin, and platelet count decreased, neutrophil count, MDA, IL-8, MPO, and catalase levels increased during CPB. During CPB, MPO and catalase values were significantly higher in group P (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01) and postoperative MDA concentration was lower in group H (p = 0.03). Platelet counts were better preserved in group H during and after CPB but neutrophil count and IL-8 level did not differ between the groups. Postoperative total protein, albumin, and fibrinogen levels were higher in group H (p < 0.05). The postoperative first day levels of troponin-I, CK-MB, and CRP increased in both groups without any significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-coated circuit provided better suppression of perioperative inflammatory markers and exhibited more favorable effects on hematologic variables than PMEA-coated circuit.     

Biocompatibility of poly2methoxyethylacrylate coating for cardiopulmonary bypass.

The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the development of postoperative complications. Heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated circuits have been developed to reduce the risk of such complications. We compared the biocompatibility of these circuits. Twelve patients scheduled to undergo elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with CPB were assigned to CPB with a PMEA-coated circuit (PMEA-coated group, n=6) or a heparin-coated circuit (heparin-coated group, n=6). The plasma concentrations of the following inflammatory markers were measured before CPB and just after, 4 hours after, and 24 hours after the termination of CPB: cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10), complement factor (C3a), polymorphonuclear elastase (PMNE), and coagulofibrinolytic factors (thrombin-antithrombin III complex [TAT], D-dimer). Postoperative clinical response was evaluated on the basis of respiratory index, blood loss, and the postoperative and preoperative body-weight percent ratio. There were no significant differences between the groups in the plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, C3a, PMNE, TAT, or D-dimer. Plasma IL-8 concentrations were below the assay detection limits at all time points in both groups. Clinical variables did not differ significantly between the groups. In conclusion, PMEA-coated CPB circuits are as biocompatible as heparin-coated CPB circuits and prevent postoperative organ dysfunction in patients undergoing elective CABG with CPB.     

Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization: off-pump versus on-pump (heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate-coated circuits).

OBJECTIVE: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) may reduce the inflammatory response associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and contribute to minimizing postoperative complications. Heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated circuits were developed to reduce such complications. We compared the postoperative inflammatory response with or without CPB. METHODS: Eighteen consecutive patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were divided into three groups: OPCAB group (n=6), heparin-coated circuits group (n=6), PMEA-coated circuits group (n=6). The plasma concentrations of the following inflammatory markers were measured: cytokines [interleukin (IL-10)], polymorphonuclear elastase (PMNE), coagulofibrinolytic factor [thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT)], complement factor (C3a). RESULTS: At the end of CPB, IL-10 and TAT concentrations were significantly different among the three groups (OPCAB group < PMEA-coated group < heparin-coated group). The PMNE concentration was significantly lower in the OPCAB group and the heparin-coated group as compared to the PMEA-coated group both at the end of CPB and 4 hours after CPB. C3a concentration was significantly lower in the OPCAB group than in the CPB groups at the end of CPB. Clinical variables did not differ significantly among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Off-pump CABG is associated with a reduction in the inflammatory response when compared with on-pump CABG, using either PMEA-coated or heparin-coated circuits.     

Effect of polymer coating (poly 2-methoxyethylacrylate) of the oxygenator on hemostatic markers during cardiopulmonary bypass in children

OBJECTIVE: Heparin and other oxygenator coatings have been used in attempts to reduce hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). This study evaluated whether an oxygenator coated with poly 2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) (X-coating; Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) would cause less activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic systems during CPB in children than a noncoated oxygenator. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: University-affiliated children's hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-six patients, 3 months to 5 years old, who underwent congenital heart surgery for repair of a ventricular septal defect, atrial septal defect, or both. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into 2 age-matched groups based on the type of oxygenator used: a noncoated oxygenator (group NC) versus a PMEA-coated oxygenator (group C). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Blood samples for coagulation and fibrinolytic markers were compared before, during, and after CPB. Despite increases in thrombin generation markers (F1.2 and TAT) at certain times during CPB in group C compared to group NC, a comparison over all times during CPB were not statistically different between groups. Overall D-dimer concentrations during CPB were elevated in group C compared to group NC (p = 0.02). Active tPA and active PAI-1 were not different between groups during or after CPB. Group C had higher platelet counts (181,000 +/- 29,000) during CPB than group NC (155,000 +/- 57,000, p = 0.04) but not postoperatively. Twelve hours postoperatively, chest tube outputs were 8.8 +/- 3 mL/kg in group C and 19.1 +/- 12 mL/kg in group NC (p = 0.003). The corresponding outputs 24 hours after surgery were 12.4 +/- 3 mL/kg and 24 +/- 11 mL/kg, respectively (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Except for a somewhat higher platelet count during CPB, there was no indication that PMEA coating resulted in less activation of coagulation and fibrinolytic systems. The lower postoperative chest tube output observed after CPB with PMEA-coated oxygenators needs to be studied further.     

Heparin-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a nonphysiologic environment for an organism. The damage of blood components may also lead to organ dysfunction, sometimes recognized as postperfusion syndrome. One possible way to diminish the risk of these complications would be to reduce the thorombogenicity and to improve the biocompatibility of the artificial surfaces by using a heparin-coated CPB circuit. In this study, we compared a heparin-coated CPB circuit with a noncoated CPB circuit in terms of biocompatibility in 20 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery. We employed a Dura-flo II (n = 10) as a heparin-coated CPB circuit and a Univox IC (n = 10) as control subjects. Ten patients (Group C) were operated on using the heparin-coated CPB circuit. A total of 10 patients were given heparin in a reduced dose (2.0 mg/kg), and additional heparin was given if the activated clotting time (ACT) was below 400 s. The control group also included 10 patients (Group NC), who were operated on with noncoated devices. They received 2.5 mg/kg of heparin, and additional heparin was given if the ACT was below 450 s. All patients had normal coagulation parameters and did not receive blood transfusion. We measured complement activation levels (C3a, C4a), platelet count, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels, D-dimer levels, and ACT during CPB and respiratory index postoperatively. The concentration of C3a in group NC was significantly higher than that in group C. Platelet reduction in group NC was significantly greater than that in group C. There were no significant differences in the remaining parameters between the 2 groups. We concluded that heparin-coated CPB circuits improved biocompatibility by reducing complement activation and platelet consumption and enabled us to reduce the dose of heparin required for systemic heparinization.     

Biocompatibility of Heparin-Coated Circuits in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract: In this study, we evaluated the biocompatibility of heparin-coated circuits in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Eight patients were divided into 2 groups: the control group (Group C) and heparin-coated group (Group H). In Group H, CPB circuits, including the arterial pump, oxygenator, and cannulas were heparin-coated. Before, during, and after CPB, blood samples were obtained to assess the platelet counts (Plat), α2-plasmin plas-minogen inhibitor complex (PIC), thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), C3 activation products (C3a), inter-leukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocyte (PMN) elastase. There was no significant difference in Plat, PIC, or TAT between groups. Group H showed significantly low levels of C3a (during and after CPB), PMN elastase (during CPB), and IL-6 (after CPB). These data demonstrated that in pediatric CPB, heparin-coated CPB circuits reduced the activation of complements and the production of PMN elastase and IL-6, suggesting the superior biocompatibility of the heparin-coated circuits.     

Heparin-Coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit: Clinical Effects in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have been reported to reduce complement activation and the inflammatory response associated with CPB. We retrospectively compared patients utilizing heparin-coated perfusion circuits with those using noncoated circuits to determine the clinical effects of the different circuits in pediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between July 1995 and July 1997, 203 patients weighing < 10 kg underwent cardiac surgery, 153 patients using heparin-coated bypass circuits and 50 patients using noncoated circuits. The 50 patients operated on with the noncoated circuit (Group N) were matched to 100 patients operated on with coated circuits (Group H) in age, weight, and type of procedure. Urine output during bypass, blood products used after bypass, postoperative ventilation days, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Body weight, perfusion time, and procedure time were not different between the two groups. Urine output during bypass was notably greater in Group H than in Group N (11.3 +/- 10.5 mL/kg per hour vs 4.8 +/- 3.1 mL/kg per hour, respectively, p < 0.0001). Postoperative mechanical ventilation markedly decreased in Group H (Group H vs N = 2.8 +/- 2.7 days vs 5.1 +/- 7.5 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Red blood cell usage, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were not statistically different, although there was a tendency toward decreased transfusion of red cell and platelets in Group H (Group H vs N = 61.2 +/- 121.1 mL/kg vs 102.0 +/- 176.7 mL/kg, respectively, in red cell, p = 0.15; and Group H vs N = 7.9 +/- 13.7 mL/kg vs 13.2 +/- 24.5 mL/kg, respectively, in platelets, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Patients operated on with the use of heparin-coated circuits had increased urine output during bypass and required less time postoperatively on the ventilator. These results suggest a reduction in the acute inflammatory response, capillary leakage, and overall systemic edema. We now routinely use coated circuits on all pediatric pump cases.     

In vivo comparison study of FDA-approved surface-modifying additives and poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate circuit surfaces coatings during cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this double-blind prospective and randomized study was to examine the effects of surface-modifying additives (SMAs) and poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) circuits on platelet count, platelet function (Sonoclot), postoperative chest tube drainage volume, peri- and postoperative blood product use, extubation time, and intensive care time. Terumo noncoated, Terumo-coated (PMEA), Cobe noncoated, and Cobe coated (SMA) circuits were evaluated to find the most cost-effective way to improve patient outcomes. We aimed to find if an additional charge for a coated CPB circuit would be recovered by reducing other patient costs (blood transfusions, intensive care unit time, and bring back postoperative bleeding). An initial literature review revealed the comparison of PMEA circuits vs. noncoated circuits and SMA circuits vs. noncoated circuits in both adult and porcine models. Both SMA- and PMEA-coated circuits decreased platelet consumption, platelet factor release, and the overall perioperative inflammatory response while on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question not answered in an initial search was simply, "which coated circuit is best for the patient: SMA or PMEA?" Research comparing the above coated circuits each other was not found. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Thirty patients were scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting and/ or valvular repair or replacement surgery. These 30 patients were randomized as 10 patients to Terumo X-Coating (PMEA surface coating) (CT), 10 patients to Cobe Smart-X coating (SMA surface coating; CC), 5 patients to Terumo noncoated tubing (NCT), and 5 patients to Cobe noncoated tubing (NCC). Informed consent was obtained from each patient before surgery. The data showed no statistically significant relationship between platelet counts, platelet function (Sonoclot), postoperative chest tube drainage volume, peri- and postoperative blood products, intensive care unit time, or total hospital length of stay. Analysis revealed statistically significant clinical associations of extubation time and protamine dose with treatment group. This study provided evidence that SMA- and PMEA-coated circuits do not improve platelet consumption or decrease blood product use for patients undergoing CPB. There was statistical significance with a reduction in extubation time and total protamine requirement needed to return activated clotting time (ACT) to baseline post-CPB. Although the use of SMA and/or PMEA circuits during CPB has clinical benefit to the CPB patient, an additional charge for the specialty circuit may not be realized.     

Comparative study of biocompatibility between the open circuit and closed circuit in cardiopulmonary bypass.

The theoretical benefit of a centrifugal pump or heparin coating demonstrated through in vitro or in vivo studies is not recognizable in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during chemical open heart surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the interface of air and blood in current CPB with an open circuit system and its relative significance in relationship to the heparin dose and heparin coating. Using the same oxygenator and circuit, an open circuit and closed circuit CPB with the same priming volume were prepared for a 4 h perfusion experiment using diluted and heparinized (3.6 U/ml) fresh human blood. In these experiments, both heparin-coated and noncoated circuits were examined. Blood was sampled before and 2, 30, 60, 120, and 240 min after the start of perfusion, and the platelet and white blood cell counts and beta-thromboglobulin (beta-TG) and C3a levels were measured. The amount of adsorbed protein in the hollow fibers was also measured after retrieval. Although the results demonstrated significantly better biocompatibility of the heparin-coated circuit than the noncoated circuit, the difference between the open and closed circuits was unexpectedly small and insignificant with either the heparin-coated circuit or noncoated circuit. In contrast, the C3a level was higher in the closed circuit than the open circuit. However, the amount of adsorbed protein was markedly lower in the closed circuit (0.7 microgram/cm2) than in the open circuit (11.1 micrograms/cm2). An immunoblot of the adsorbed protein showed a higher density of fibrinogen bands and conversion to fibrin in the open circuit. We speculate that the lower blood C3a level in the open circuit suggests that C3a was taken in by the adsorbed protein. In conclusion, analysis of the adsorbed protein indicates the lower biocompatibility of the open circuit. Similar experiments with less heparin use and more severe conditions will be necessary to elucidate the essential benefit of making a CPB closed circuit.     

Clinical evaluation of poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) in primary coronary artery bypass grafting

In an attempt to make cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) less traumatic for patients undergoing cardiac surgery, extracorporeal circuits (ECC) have been modified to achieve this goal. Poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA, X-coating) is a new polymer coating used in the ECC. PMEA studies have shown excellent biocompatibility with the components of blood. In this evaluation, PMEA-coated ECC were compared with control (CTR) circuits with emphasis on hematological parameters, peri-operative homologous blood product usage, and clinical outcomes. Patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to either a PMEA group (n = 30) or a CTR group (n = 30). Extracorporeal circuit components in the PMEA group were coated except for the cardioplegia delivery device and cannulas. Patients in the CTR group had just the arterial line filter coated. The following hematological parameters were measured: platelet count (PLT), white blood cell count (WBC), red blood cell count (RBC), and hematocrit (Hct). Blood product usage was observed along with clinical outcomes for the following parameters: ventilation time, mediastinal tube output, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay. The preoperative patient profiles were comparable between the two groups. The PMEA group had marginally higher CPB times (134+/-31.9 vs. 118+/-33.7 minutes) and cross clamp times (83.9+/-21.3 vs. 73.7+/-21.6 minutes), however no significant differences were reached. Platelet count, RBC, and Hct levels were also comparable between groups with no significant differences. However, there was a significant difference in WBC between groups (p = 0.041). Less platelets were administered both intraoperatively and 48 hours postoperatively in the PMEA group. The authors evaluated PMEA-coating by measuring clinical outcomes, such as ventilation time, ICU and hospital lengths of stay, and homologous blood utilization. PMEA patients trended towards less homologous blood transfusions, which helped save an average of $83.41 per patient. Further clinical studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of this new polymer coating.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce blood cell trauma. Experiments in the pig

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding remain important problems in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared heparin-coated with non-coated circuits in the pig. Twenty animals were perfused for 2 h at normothermia using membrane oxygenators (Bentley Bos 50). Two groups were studied. In the non-coated group (NC, n = 11) the CPB circuits used were without a heparin coating. This group had systemic heparinization of 400 IU/kg to maintain an ACT (activated clotting time) of over 400 s during CPB. In the coated group (C, n = 9), all surfaces exposed to blood in the CPB circuits were heparin-coated. This group had the heparin dose reduced to 25% (100 IU/kg) without further administration regardless of ACT. During CPB, group C displayed shorter ACT (per definition), higher platelet count, platelet adhesion and lower fibrinolysis and haemolysis (P less than 0.05) as compared to group NC. No thromboembolic events were detected during CPB. Three animals in group NC and 4 animals in group C were weaned from CPB and protaminized. Four hours postoperatively, the leucocyte consumption was two-fold greater and blood loss about four-fold greater in group NC as compared with group C (P less than 0.05). Perfusion with heparin-coated surfaces reduces blood cell trauma. The decreased postoperative blood loss observed in group C is probably explained by the reduced dosages of heparin and protamine.     

Influence of PMEA-coated bypass circuits on perioperative inflammatory response

BACKGROUND: Poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA) is a new coating material, and several experimental studies have revealed excellent biocompatibility of PMEA-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. The clinical utility of the PMEA-coated circuits was compared with that of uncoated circuits, focusing on perioperative inflammatory response. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were randomized to PMEA-coated (group P; Capiox RX25; n = 11) or uncoated (group U; Capiox SX10; n = 11) circuit group, and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve operations. The following markers, as well as clinical outcomes, were analyzed perioperatively: (a) complement activation by C3a (including C3a-desArg) concentrations; (b) leukocyte activation by polymorphonuclear-elastase concentrations; (c) acute phase inflammatory response by interleukin-6 concentrations; and (d) platelet preservation by number of platelets. RESULTS: The maximal values of C3a and polymorphonuclear-elastase were significantly lower in group P than in group U. The intergroup difference of interleukin-6 was not significant. Although preservation of platelets was significantly better in group P until 1 hour after initiating cardiopulmonary bypass, no significant intergroup difference was observed thereafter. The duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation revealed no significant intergroup difference. CONCLUSIONS: The PMEA-coated circuits exhibited better suppression of perioperative complement and leukocyte activation than the uncoated circuits. In addition, the price of the PMEA-coated circuits is the same as that of the uncoated circuits. Therefore, we judged that the clinical utility of the PMEA-coated circuits is superior to those of the uncoated circuits.     

Effects of new polymer-coated extracorporeal circuits on biocompatibility during cardiopulmonary bypass

An inflammatory response due to bioincompatibility of extracorporeal circuits is a major clinical issue during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). By using a swine model, we determined whether new polymer-coated circuits, the blood-contacting surfaces of which are coated with poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA), would reduce the inflammatory response during CPB. Plasma bradykinin levels and the percentages of CD35-positive monocytes in PMEA-coated circuits were significantly lower than those in uncoated circuits during CPB. The amount of proteins adsorbed on the PMEA-coated circuits was significantly lower than that on the uncoated circuits (0.30 microg/cm2 versus 3.42 microg/ cm2). Almost no IgG, IgM, or C3c/d was detected in proteins adsorbed on the PMEA-coated circuits although these proteins were clearly detected in proteins adsorbed on the uncoated circuits. We concluded that PMEA coating could reduce complement activation during CPB by suppressing the adsorption of IgG and IgM, which activate C3 via the classical pathway, on the surface of the circuits.     

Changes in Platelet, Granulocyte, and Complement Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Heparin-coated Equipment

Abstract: The effects of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) systems on platelet, granulocyte, and complement activation were investigated during cardiopulmonary bypass. Thirty patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with a heparin-coated (Carmeda Bio-Active Surface, CBAS, Medtronic, U.S.A.) CPB system (HC group, n = 10), a heparin-coated oxygenator and uncoated CPB circuit (HO group, n = 10), or an uncoated system (UC group, n = 10). In the HO group, plasma C3a (1667 ± 632 ng/ml) and C4a (1088 ± 319 ng/ml) concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the UC group (2846 ± 1045 ng/ml and 1494 ± 480 ng/ml, respectively) 10 min after the administration of protamine, but there were no significant differences in the platelet or granulocyte counts. In the HC group, granulocyte elastase concentrations 120 min after the onset of CPB (365 ± 177 μg/L) and 10 min after the administration of protamine (676 ± 314 μg/L) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the other 2 groups (820 ± 341 and 893 ± 303 μg/L and 1365 ± 595 and 1,258 ± 622 μg/L). In addition, the increase in the plasma C3a concentration in the HC group 60 (p < 0.05) and 120 min after the onset of CPB (p < 0.05) was significantly less than in the other 2 groups. The C3a and C4a concentrations 10 min after the administration of protamine were significantly (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05) less in the HC group than in the UC group. Platelet counts 10 min after the administration of protamine were significantly higher (p < 0.05) and plasma β-throm-boglobulin concentrations during CPB were significantly lower in the HC group than in the other 2 groups 5 (p < 0.05), 60, and 120 min (p < 0.005) after the onset of CPB. Postoperative blood loss during the first 12 h in the HC group was significantly (p < 0.05) less than that in the UC group. The heparin-coated oxygenator and uncoated CPB circuit reduced complement activation but demonstrated no significant effects on the platelet and granulocyte systems. However, the heparin-coated CPB circuit (with all components making blood contact) reduced platelet, granulocyte, and complement activation and significantly reduced postoperative blood loss. Therefore, heparin coating of CPB systems improves biocompatibility.     

Heparin antibodies and thromboembolism in heparin-coated and noncoated ventricular assist devices

OBJECTIVE: Coating of ventricular assist devices (VADs) with heparin improves the biocompatibility and may reduce the need for systemic anticoagulation. However, heparins are associated with the risk of formation of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies (HPF4/A) and the development of heparin-associated thromboemboli. We analyzed the occurrence of HPF4/A and thromboembolism in patients with heparin-coated and noncoated VADs. METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled in the investigation. Fifty-seven received a heparin-coated (group 1) and 43 a noncoated (group 2) VAD. HPF4/A testing was performed before and 2 and 12 weeks after implantation by the heparin platelet factor 4 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the occurrence of HPF4/A in the 2 groups (P =.102). Before the operation, 21 of the patients in group 1 had positive test responses and 25 in group 2. No patient had HPF4/A after termination of systemic heparinization. In group 1 there was no significant difference in the incidence of recurrent pump thromboses in patients who had positive test responses for HPF4/A (n = 11) when compared with those who had negative test responses (n = 9, P =.89). Twenty-one patients had HPF/A but no thromboembolism. However, all 22 patients who had thromboembolism had HPF4/A. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin coating of the VAD surface does not enhance the occurrence of HPF4/A-associated immunologic or thrombogenic reactions. However, the presence of these antibodies is strongly associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism in patients with a VAD.     

Biocompatibility of heparin-coated extracorporeal bypass circuits: new heparin bonded bioline system

Biocompatibility of a new type of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass equipment, the Bioline, was evaluated in coronary artery bypass surgery cases. The heparin-coated (H) group (n = 15; Quadrox Bioline oxygenator/reservior and Carmeda BioMedicus BP-80 centrifugal pump) was compared with the nonheparin-coated (N) group (n = 12; uncoated, otherwise similar oxygenator, centrifugal pump, tubing, and filter set). Both groups used full systemic heparinization. The peak values of neutrophil elastase, C3a, IL-6, and IL-8 at 2 h after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and C3a levels at the end of CPB and at 2 h after CPB were significantly reduced in the H group compared with those of the N group. However, no statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in thrombin-antithrombin complex, D-dimer, beta-thromboglobulin, or platelet factor-4. No significant differences were observed in hemostasis time, postoperative 12 h blood loss, required amount of blood transfusion, or intubation time. In conclusion, the Bioline demonstrated partially improved biocompatibility, in terms of leukocyte and complement activation, and proinflammatory cytokine production. However, it did not improve platelet activation, coagulation, or fibrinolysis cascade under full systemic heparinization. As a result, the clinical beneficial impact seemed to be the minimum.     

Formation of C5a during cardiopulmonary bypass: inhibition by precoating with heparin

A novel enzyme immunoassay based on direct detection of C5a by a monoclonal antibody (C17/5) specific for a neoepitope exposed in C5a/C5adesArg was used to measure in vivo and in vitro C5a formation during cardiopulmonary bypass. In vivo, we observed a significant threefold to fourfold increase in patient plasma C5a/C5adesArg levels from baseline values (5.6; 1.6 to 12.9 ng/mL) (median and range) up to 42 hours postoperatively (17.5; 6.5 to 46.0 ng/mL) when two different uncoated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were used. Coating of the extracorporeal circuit with end-point-attached heparin completely abolished C5a formation in vitro during circulation of blood through the circuit for 120 minutes. The C5a concentration (median and range) was 3.2 (2.6 to 15.9) ng/mL at the start and 3.1 (2.7 to 15.0) ng/mL at the end of the experiment. In the uncoated setups the corresponding C5a concentrations were 10.1 (6.2 to 17.5) and 19.7 (13.1 to 24.3) ng/mL. Finally, heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits were examined in vivo. C5a levels did not increase significantly during the cardiopulmonary bypass period in the heparin-coated group in contrast to the uncoated group, but the postoperative increase in C5a levels was similar in the two groups. We conclude that heparin coating improves biocompatibility by completely abolishing C5a formation in vitro. The discrepancy between the in vitro and the in vivo findings is probably related to the complicated biological turnover of C5a.     

The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators

Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells. IMPLICATIONS: Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.     

Antiinflammatory effect of heparin-coated circuits with leukocyte-depleting filters in coronary bypass surgery

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with a systemic inflammatory response. We examined combined use of heparin coating of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and a leukocyte-depleting arterial line filter to reduce this response. Thirty patients were allocated randomly to equal groups with a conventional circuit and arterial line filter (C group), a heparin-coated circuit with a conventional filter (H group), or a heparin-coated circuit with a leukocyte-depleting arterial line filter (HF group). Cytokines and respiratory function were repeatedly measured perioperatively. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations in the HF group were lower than in the C group immediately following bypass and operation, at 4 h, and 12 h (p < 0.05). Plasma IL-8 was lower in the HF group than in the C group at 4 h (p < 0.05). The respiratory index was lower immediately after bypass in the HF group than the C group (0.61 +/- 0.2 versus 1.05 +/- 0.4, p < 0.05). Heparin-coated circuits with leukocyte-depleting filters decrease inflammatory responses and improve pulmonary function during operation.