Anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary duct without choledochal cyst: is cholecystectomy alone sufficient?

Purpose

Anomalous union of the pancreaticobiliary duct (AUPBD) is frequently associated with choledochal cyst and biliary tract cancers. Management of AUPBD with choledochal cyst consists of extrahepatic bile duct excision and cholecystectomy. In cases of AUPBD without choledochal cyst, cholecystectomy alone is usually recommended. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of biliary tract cancer in AUPBD patients in order to assess the validity of the currently recommended operative management.

Methods

Of a total of 10,255 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography cases performed at two Korea University hospitals from 2001 to 2010, 55 (0.54 %) cases of AUPBD were identified. Patients with AUPBD were divided according to its subtype (P-C union and C-P union) and the presence of choledochal cyst for analysis. The occurrence of benign and malignant disease was evaluated and compared between the groups.

Results

Gallbladder stones were more frequently found in AUPBD patients without choledochal cyst (p?=?0.032). Biliary tract cancer occurred more frequently in P-C union (p?=?0.050), especially the common bile duct cancer (p?=?0.023). When analyzed according to the presence of choledochal cyst, biliary tract cancer occurred more frequently in AUPBD patients without choledochal cyst (p?=?0.005), with bile duct cancer being significantly more common (p?=?0.015). However, there was no difference in the presence of gallbladder cancer between the two groups (p?=?0.318).

Conclusions

Since cancers of the biliary tract occur more frequently in the AUPBD group without choledochal cyst, cholecystectomy alone may not be protective of the future occurrence of bile duct cancers, and thus, vigilant surveillance is necessary in this population group.     

Role of Intraoperative Cholangiography in Patients Whose Biliary Tree Was Evaluated Preoperatively by Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

Background

Routine performance of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of IOC during cholecystectomy in addition to preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in our institution over a 12-year period.

Methods

A total of 425 consecutive patients who underwent IOC during cholecystectomy were included in this study. MRCP was performed preoperatively for bile duct evaluation in all patients. When common bile duct (CBD) stones were detected, they were removed endoscopically before the operation. We estimated the results of IOC in terms of the success rate, the detection rate of anatomic abnormality of the biliary system, and the incidence of residual CBD stones.

Results

MRCP preoperatively identified 6 (1.4?%) patients with abnormal biliary systems and 56 with CBD stones, which were endoscopically removed. The success rate of IOC was 93.8?% (399/425). Abnormalities of the biliary system were detected in 12 patients (12/399, 3.0?%) and CBD stones in 8 (8/399, 2.0?%). Of the eight patients with stones, seven had been examined by endoscopy preoperatively and found to have CBD stones. The detection rate of bile duct stones in patients with preoperative endoscopic removal of CBD stones (7/56, 12.5?%) was significantly higher than those with CBD stones first detected during IOC (1/365, 0.3?%) (p?<?0.01). Moreover, no residual CBD stones were detected in patients who were operated on within fewer than 12?days from endoscopic treatment to the operation.

Conclusions

IOC is indicated even after preoperative sphincterotomy for CBD stones. In our study, it resulted in a 12.5?% incidence of persistent stones after sphincterotomy. IOC plays an additional role in detecting CBD stones and in revealing abnormalities of the biliary tree in patients whose biliary tree was preoperatively evaluated by MRCP.     

Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones in Sweden 1989–2006: An Observational Nationwide Study of a Paradigm Shift

Background

The preferred strategies for treatment of common bile duct stones have changed from choledochotomy with cholecystectomy to sphincterotomy with or without cholecystectomy. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of these treatment strategies on a nationwide level in Sweden.

Methods

All patients with hospital care for benign biliary diagnoses 1988–2006 were identified in Swedish registers. Patients with common bile duct stones and a first admission with choledochotomy and or endoscopic sphincterotomy from 1989 through 2006 comprised the study group. These patients were analyzed with respect to readmission for biliary diagnoses and acute pancreatitis.

Results

Incidence of open and laparoscopic choledochotomy decreased from 19.4 to 5.2, whereas endoscopic sphincterotomy increased from 5.1 to 26.1 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, respectively. Among patients treated for common bile duct stones (n?=?26,815), 60.0?% underwent cholecystectomy during the first hospital admission in 1989–1994, compared to 30.1?% in 2001–2006. The treatment strategy that included endoscopic sphincterotomy was associated with more readmissions for biliary diagnoses and increased risk for acute pancreatitis than the treatment strategy with choledochotomy. However, patients treated with endoscopic sphincterotomy and concurrent cholecystectomy at the index admission had the lowest risk of readmission.

Conclusions

Cholecystectomy has been increasingly separated from treatment of bile duct stones, and endoscopic sphincterotomy has superseded choledochotomy as a first alternative for bile duct clearance in Sweden. In patients fit for surgery, clearance of the common bile duct can be combined with cholecystectomy, as it probably reduces the need for biliary related readmissions.     

Post Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Biliary Dilation: Natural Process or Significant Entity?

Background

Changes in the biliary system after gastric bypass are not well defined. Dilation may be normal or due to biliary tract pathology. The purpose of this study is to review patients who underwent imaging of their biliary system both before and after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an effort to elucidate the effect this operation has on hepatic duct diameter.

Methods

Patients with imaging both before and at least 3?months after gastric bypass were analyzed. Hepatic duct was measured at the level of the porta hepatis to determine interval changes.

Results

Thirty-three patients had postoperative imaging at least 3?months following gastric bypass. Mean hepatic duct diameter was 5.2?±?2 and 7.1?±?2.6?mm preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively (p?<?0.01). Patients with prior cholecystectomy had hepatic duct diameters of 7.9?±?1.3 and 9.5?±?3.5?mm preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively (p?=?0.3). Patients who had not previously undergone cholecystectomy had hepatic duct diameters of 4.3?±?1.1 and 6.4?±?1.8?mm preoperatively and postoperatively, respectively (p?<?0.01).

Conclusions

Hepatic duct diameter increases after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. A better understanding of this phenomenon may limit the need for further work-up in patients with incidentally detected biliary dilation.     

ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a combined (one-step) procedure: a random comparison to the standard (two-step) procedure

Background

Current treatment of complicated calculous biliary disease typically involves a two-step procedure consisting of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Alternatively, laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC) and intraoperative common bile duct exploration or ERCP at a later date may be performed. This study compared the benefits of the traditional two-step procedure to the novel one-step procedure for the management of calculous biliary disease.

Methods

A retrospective review of 20 patients was conducted comparing one-step to two-step procedures for the management of choledocholithiasis. We define the one-step procedure to be a laparoscopic cholecystectomy with IOC to confirm the presence or absence of stones. Intraoperative ERCP with stone extraction was conducted if necessary as part of the one-step procedure.

Results

A statistically significant difference existed between hospital charges for one-step ($58,145.30, SD $17,963.09) and two-step ($78,895.53, SD $21,954.78) procedures (p = 0.033). Other parameters (length of stay, preoperative days) trended toward significance; however, statistical significance was not achieved.

Conclusions

There appears to be a significant cost reduction with implementation of the one-step treatment of calculous biliary disease. Further research with a larger study population is necessary to determine the additional benefits of this procedure and to help augment the surgical endoscopists’ armamentarium.     

The Impact of Intraoperative Cholangiography on Recurrent Pancreatitis and Biliary Complications in Patients with Gallstone Pancreatitis

Introduction

Although gallstone pancreatitis is initiated by the presence of stones in the common bile duct, the benefit associated with routine intraoperative cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy in these patients is unclear. The purpose of this study, using population-based data, was to determine the impact of cholangiography on clinical outcomes after cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis.

Methods

All patients who were admitted to hospital from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2001 in Nova Scotia, Canada with pancreatitis who underwent cholecystectomy during the same admission were identified. The rates of recurrent pancreatitis and biliary complications after surgery were compared between patients who underwent cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography ± common bile duct exploration and those who underwent cholecystectomy alone, using three linked administrative databases.

Results

Three hundred thirty-two patients were identified, 119 had cholangiography at the time of cholecystectomy and 213 did not. After a median follow-up of after 3.8?years, there was no difference in the rate of recurrent pancreatitis or biliary complications between those who had cholangiography ± common bile duct exploration at the time of surgery and those who did not; 13.4 versus 10.8?%, respectively (p?=?0.55).

Conclusions

These data suggest that intraoperative cholangiography does not improve outcomes after cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis.     

Long-term follow-up study of gallbladder in situ after endoscopic common duct stone removal in Korean patients

Background

Although there has been much debate over the fate of the gallbladder (GB) after endoscopic common bile duct (CBD) stone removal, subsequent cholecystectomy is generally recommended in patients with GB stones to prevent further biliary complications. The aims of this study were to assess the natural course of the patients with GB in situ after endoscopic CBD stone removal and to evaluate the necessity of prophylactic cholecystectomy.

Methods

Four hundred sixty-one patients who had undergone CBD stone removal at Yeungnam University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2004 were retrospectively analyzed, and 232 patients were ultimately enrolled in this study.

Results

The mean duration of follow-up was 73 (range = 7–126) months in the cholecystectomy group and 66 (6–127) months in the GB in situ group (p = 0.168). Ten patients (14.7 %) in the cholecystectomy group and 31 patients (18.9 %) in the GB in situ group developed recurrent CBD stones (p = 0.295). The highest percentage of recurrent CBD stones in both groups was that for brown stones (80 and 80.6 %). In the GB in situ group, cumulative recurrence rates of CBD stones were not significantly different between patients with GB stones and without GB stones (15.9 vs. 20 %, p = 0.798). However, the incidence of acute cholecystitis was significantly higher in patients with GB stones compared to patients without GB stones (13.6 vs. 2.5 %, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

Prophylactic cholecystectomy seems to be unnecessary in patients without GB stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy. However, in patients with GB stones, elective cholecystectomy or close observation is recommended due to the higher risk of cholecystitis.     

Single-Stage vs. Two-Stage Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct stones: A Prospective Randomized Trial with Long-Term Follow-up

Aim

The preferred approach to the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones is uncertain, with single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBD exploration vs. two-stage preoperative endoscopic CBD clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy being debated. To address this, a prospective randomized study which compared these two management strategies was undertaken.

Methods

Between Jan 2002 and Dec 2005, patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones diagnosed by preoperative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were randomized to single-stage vs. two-stage treatment. In a single-stage group, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBD exploration were undertaken at the same operation, whereas in a two-stage group, endoscopic stone clearance was followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2–5 days later. Early treatment success and complications and longer-term follow-up for the two groups were compared.

Results

Two hundred twenty-one patients were enrolled in the trial, 110 in the single-stage group and 111 in the two-stage group. There was no significant difference in the success rate of CBD clearance (93.6 vs. 94.6 %, p?=?0.76) or the complication rates (3.6 vs. 5.1 %, p?=?0.527) between the groups. However, at longer-term follow-up, recurrent CBD stones were seen more often in the two-stage group (9.5 vs. 2.1 %, p?=?0.037).

Conclusion

The single-stage and two-stage approaches were equally effective in achieving initial clearance of CBD stones. However, recurrent CBD stones occurred more commonly in patients who had undergone two-stage treatment with initial endoscopic stone clearance, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Effectiveness of Intraoperative Cholangiography Using Indocyanine Green (Versus Contrast Fluid) for the Correct Assessment of Extrahepatic Bile Ducts During Day-Case Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Introduction

During cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography using contrast fluid (IOC-CF) is still the “gold standard” for biliary tract identification but has many associated pitfalls. A new IOC technique using indocyanine green (IOC-IG) appears to be promising. Here, we studied the effectiveness of IOC-IG (vs IOC-CF) during day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Materials and Methods

Over a 6-month period, we included 23 patients (with no cirrhosis or risk factors for choledocholithiasis) scheduled for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The primary efficacy criterion was the “analyzability rate” (i.e., the ability to identify the cystic duct, the cystic duct-hepatic duct junction, and the common bile duct) for the IOC-CF and IOC-IG procedures after dissection. Indocyanine green was infused under general anesthesia. The same near-infrared laparoscopic imaging system was used for IOC-IG and conventional visual inspection. IOC-CF was always attempted after dissection. Each patient served as his/her own control. Cholecystectomies were video-recorded for subsequent off-line, blind analysis.

Results

The analyzability rate was 74 % for IOC-IG after dissection, 70 % for IOC-CF (p?=?0.03), 26 % for conventional visual inspection, and 48 % for IOC-IG before dissection. When each IOC modality (conventional visual inspection, IOC-IG before and after dissection) was considered as a diagnostic test, the accuracy for simultaneous identification of the three anatomic elements was respectively 48, 52, and 74 %. No adverse events occurred during the IOC-IG procedure.

Conclusion

IOC-IG was feasible and safe. Our results suggest that this technique is more effective than IOC-CF for biliary tract identification after dissection and may constitute a powerful diagnostic test for the detection of extrahepatic ducts.     

Does prophylactic stent insertion to the common bile duct during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) before cholecystectomy have any impact on the rate of biliary complications?

Background

Patients with choledochocystolithiasis generally undergo endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) followed by elective cholecystectomy. They can experience the development of recurrent biliary events while waiting for their scheduled surgery.

Aim

This study investigated whether stent insertion before cholecystectomy influences the rate of complications.

Methods

The study compared retrospective and prospective groups of patients with choledochocystolithiasis who underwent ES with or without prophylactic common bile duct stent insertion before cholecystectomy. The rate of emergency cholecystectomies and biliary complications during the waiting period before the elective procedure was analyzed.

Results

For the study, 162 patients with choledochocystolithiasis who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with ES were divided to two subgroups. Group A included 52 patients with stent insertion (mean age, 58.3 ± 19.4 years), and group B included 110 patients with no stent insertion (mean age, 61.4 ± 17.7 years) (p = 0.32). Males made up 33.3 % of group A and 53.7 % of group B (p = 0.018). The median time to elective cholecystectomy (open or laparoscopic) was 41.5 days for the patients without bile duct stent insertion before cholecystectomy and 53.5 days for the patients who had the stent insertion before cholecystectomy (p = 0.63). Repeat emergency ERCP due to acute cholangitis was 5.6 % in group A and 1.0 % in group B (p = 0.43). Emergency cholecystectomy rates due to acute cholecystitis after ES were 15.4 % in group A and 14.5 % in group B (p = 1.00). No mortality occurred.

Conclusions

According to the study findings, prophylactic stent insertion during ERCP before cholecystectomy has no impact on biliary complications.     

Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography During Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Review of 196 Consecutive Patients

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) has been increasingly performed as a potentially less invasive alternative to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, recent evidences suggest a higher incidence of complications, notably bile duct injuries, in SILC. We reviewed our experiences with routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during SILC to investigate its feasibility and usefulness.

Methods

Among 228 patients who underwent SILC at our institution from September 2009 to July 2012, a total of 196 patients in which an IOC was attempted were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

IOC was successful in 178 of 196 patients, yielding a success rate of 90.8 %. There were no IOC-related complications. Common bile duct (CBD) stones were detected by IOC in 16 patients (8.2 %), all of which were treated by subsequent single-incision laparoscopic CBD exploration or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stone extraction. In addition, IOC revealed filling defects in the cystic duct (four patients) and poor passage of contrast medium into the duodenum (one patient). In one patient with severe acute cholecystitis, cholangiography via an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage tube revealed misinterpretation of CBD as cystic duct.

Conclusions

We, thus, conclude that routine IOC during SILC is feasible and useful to detect biliary stones and to gain an accurate picture of biliary anatomy.     

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with Complicated Cholecystitis: a Safety and Feasibility Study

Background

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is nowadays a preferred one-stage treatment. However, the influence of complicated cholecystitis (CC) on LCBDE has rarely been addressed. In the present study we aimed to verify whether severe gallbladder inflammation would adversely affect the outcome of LCBDE.

Material and methods

From 2008 to 2011, all patients undergoing LC and LCBDE at China Medical University Hospital were included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of cholecystitis. Those with unstable hemodynamics and co-morbidities who were deemed unfit for general anesthesia were excluded. Patient demographics, surgical results, and outcome were compared between the groups.

Results

During the study period, 117 patients diagnosed with cholecystitis were found to have common bile duct (CBD) stones and underwent LC?+?LCBDE. Of these 117 patients, 87 had uncomplicated cholecystitis (UC) and the remaining 30 patients had CC. There was no demographic difference between the groups, but for patients with CC there were marginally longer operative times (190 vs. 223?min, p?=?0.141), more blood loss (10?vs. 150?ml, p?<?0.05), and longer postoperative hospital stays (6?vs. 7?days, p?<?0.05). The risk of developing major intraoperative complications was not greater for those with CC. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was necessary in a total of 12 cases (10?%) with an overall 1?% mortality rate.

Conclusions

Complicated cholecystitis was not a contraindication for LCBDE. Complete stone clearance can be achieved in a substantial number of cases with an acceptable complication rate. Further prospective randomized studies are required to validate its long-term safety.     

Single-stage laparoscopic management of choledocholithiasis: An analysis after implementation of a mastery learning resident curriculum

Background

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is an underutilized treatment for choledocholithiasis. We sought to evaluate the impact of a simulation-based mastery-learning curriculum for surgical residents on laparoscopic common bile duct exploration utilization and to compare outcomes for patients treated with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Biliary cirrhosis and sepsis are two risk factors of failure after surgical repair of major bile duct injury post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background

Major bile duct injury (MBDI) remains frequent after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) reaching 0.3 to 0.6 % and is associated with a significant mortality rate. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the factors likely to influence the long-term results of surgical repair for MBDI occurring after LC.

Methods

Medical records of patients referred to our referral center from January 1992 to January 2010 for management of bile duct injury following LC were retrospectively analyzed, and patients with MBDI were identified. Clinicopathological factors likely to influence long-term results after surgical repair were assessed by univariate and multivariable analysis.

Results

During the study period, 38 patients were treated for MBDI. These 38 patients underwent Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) or HJ revision in 25 (66 %) and 13 (34 %) cases, respectively. The median follow-up period was 93 (26–204) months. A Clavien-Dindo post-operative morbidity class >3 occurred in 10 (26 %) cases and was independently associated with a surgical repair performed during a sepsis period (OR?=?102.5; IC 95 % [7.12; 11,352], p?<?0.007). Long-term results showed that biliary strictures occurred in 5 (13 %) cases and were associated with sepsis (p?<?0.006), liver cirrhosis (p?<?0.002) and post-operative complications (p?<?0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed that only liver cirrhosis remained predictive of stricture (OR?=?26.4, 95 % CI [2; 1,018], p?<?0.026).

Conclusion

When MBDI occurs following LC, HJ seems to be the optimal treatment but should not be performed during a sepsis period. Long-term results are significantly altered by the presence of a biliary cirrhosis at time of repair.     

Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice: Calculous Gallbladder Disease

Background

Gallbladder disease is common and, if managed incorrectly, can lead to high rates of morbidity, mortality, and extraneous costs. The most common complications of gallstones include biliary colic, acute cholecystitis, common bile duct stones, and gallstone pancreatitis. Ultrasound is the initial imaging modality of choice. Additional diagnostic and therapeutic studies including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are not routinely required but may play a role in specific situations.

Discussion

Biliary colic and acute cholecystitis are best treated with early laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients with common bile duct stones should be managed with cholecystectomy, either after or concurrent with endoscopic or surgical relief of obstruction and clearance of stones from the bile duct. Mild gallstone pancreatitis should be treated with cholecystectomy during the initial hospitalization to prevent recurrence. Emerging techniques for cholecystectomy include single-incision laparoscopic surgery and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Early results in highly selected patients demonstrate the safety of these techniques. The management of complications of the gallbladder should be timely and evidence-based, and choice of procedures, particularly for common bile duct stones, is largely influenced by facility and surgeon factors.     

Real-time near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent cholangiography in single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): a single-institutional prospective study

Background

Bile duct injury is a rare but serious complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the primary cause is misinterpretation of biliary anatomy. This may occur more frequently with a single-incision approach due to difficulties in exposing and visualizing the triangle of Calot. Intraoperative cholangiography was proposed to overcome this problem, but due to multiple issues, it is not used routinely. Indocyanine green (ICG) near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent cholangiography is non invasive and provides real-time biliary images during surgery, which may improve the safety of single-incision cholecystectomy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this technique during single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC).

Methods

Patients presenting with symptomatic biliary gallstones without suspicion of common bile duct stones underwent SSRC with ICG-NIR fluorescent cholangiography using the da Vinci Fluorescence Imaging Vision System. During patient preparation, 2.5 mg of ICG was injected intravenously. During surgery, the biliary anatomy was imaged in real time, which guided dissection of Calot’s triangle. Perioperative outcomes included biliary tree visualizations, operative time, conversion and complications rates, and length of hospital stay.

Results

There were 45 cases between July 2011 and January 2012. All procedures were completed successfully; there were no conversions and at least one structure was visualized in each patient. The rates of visualization were 93 % for the cystic duct, 88 % for the common hepatic duct, and 91 % for the common bile duct prior to Calot’s dissection; after Calot’s dissection, the rates were 97 % for all three ducts. Mean hospital stay was 1.1 days and there were no bile duct injuries or any other major complications.

Conclusion

Real-time high-resolution fluorescent imaging to identify the biliary tree anatomy during SSRC using the da Vinci Fluorescence Imaging Vision System was safe and effective.     

Combined vascular and biliary fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Background

Bile duct injury in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a rare but serious complication. Concomitant vascular injury worsens the outcome of bile duct injury repair. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) is a promising, innovative, and noninvasive method for the intraoperative identification of biliary and vascular anatomy during cholecystectomy. This study assessed the practical application of combined vascular and biliary fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic gallbladder surgery for early biliary tract delineation and arterial anatomy confirmation.

Methods

Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in this prospective, single-institutional study. To delineate the major bile ducts and arteries, a dedicated laparoscope, offering both conventional and fluorescence imaging, was used. ICG (2.5 mg) was administered intravenously immediately after induction of anesthesia and in half of the patients repeated at establishment of critical view of safety for concomitant arterial imaging. During dissection of the base of the gallbladder and the cystic duct, the extrahepatic bile ducts were visualized. Intraoperative recognition of the biliary structures was registered at set time points, as well as visualization of the cystic artery after repeat ICG administration.

Results

Thirty patients were included. ICG was visible in the liver and bile ducts within 20 minutes after injection and remained up to approximately 2 h, using the ICG-filter of the laparoscope. In most cases, the common bile duct (83 %) and cystic duct (97 %) could be identified significantly earlier than with conventional camera mode. In 13 of 15 patients (87 %), confirmation of the cystic artery was obtained successfully after repeat ICG injection. No per- or postoperative complications occurred as a consequence of ICG use.

Conclusion

Biliary and vascular fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is easily applicable in clinical practice, can be helpful for earlier visualization of the biliary tree, and is useful for the confirmation of the arterial anatomy.     

Primary Closure Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Reexploration for the Patients Who Underwent Prior Biliary Operation

To assess feasibility of primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration for the patients who underwent prior biliary operation, we retrospectively studied 50 patients with recurrent or residual common bile duct (CBD) stones who underwent laparoscopic biliary reoperation between June 2008 and June 2013. Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) was treated for all these patients and validated failed. They were divided into two groups. Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) was performed in 25 cases (group A); LCBDE plus T-tube drainage was performed in others (group B). The items of operation were compared. The duration of the operation in group A was shorter than that in group B (141?±?85 vs 158?±?71 min, p?<?0.05), as was postoperative hospital stay (16?±?2.3 vs 23?±?2.3 h, p?<?0.05) and the times of postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery (16?±?2.3 vs 23?±?2.3 h, p?<?0.05). Just one duodenum was damaged in group B. Postoperative clinically significant bile leakage occurred in two patients in group A and one case in group B. The median follow-up was 18 months. No postoperative pancreatitis, postoperative bleeding, bile peritonitis after T-tube removal, stricture of bile duct, and death occurred in the two groups. Just two cases in group B were verified residual stones after 1 month. Primary closure following laparoscopic common bile duct reexploration for the patients who underwent prior biliary operation appears to be a minimally invasive, safe, feasible, and effective procedure when done by expert laparoscopic surgeons.     

A cystic duct with no visible signal on magnetic resonance cholangiography is associated with laparoscopic difficulties: an analysis of 695 cases

Background/aims

We investigated the association between the magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) results and surgical difficulties and bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

Methods

MRC was performed on 695 consecutive patients before LC. We divided the patients into two groups (visible cystic duct group and “no signal” cystic duct on MRC group) and compared them with regard to the length of the operation, conversion rate to open cholecystectomy (OC) and rate of bile duct injury.

Results

The “no signal” cystic duct on MRC group had a longer operation and higher rate of conversion to OC compared with the visible cystic duct group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of bile duct injury between the two groups.

Conclusions

The “no signal” cystic duct on MRC group was associated with laparoscopic difficulties, but not with an increased rate of biliary injury. When a visible cystic duct is not observed on MRC an early conversion to open surgery may avoid a bile duct injury during LC.     

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration with Conventional Instruments: an Innovative Technique and a Comparative Study

Background

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery developed rapidly in recent years. We introduce an innovative technique: single-incision laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (SILCBDE) with conventional instruments. A retrospective comparison between SILCBDE and standard laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) was analyzed.

Methods

Thirty-four patients who underwent LCBDE for choledocholithiasis in a period of 17 months were enrolled. Seventeen standard LCBDEs and 17 SILCBDEs were attempted. Simultaneous cholecystectomies were performed.

Results

The stone clearance rate was 94.1 % (16 patients) in the standard LCBDE group and 100 % in the SILCBDE group. There was no statistical difference in demographic distribution, clinical presentations, and operative results between the two groups, except the SILCBDE group had a higher rate of acute cholecystitis than the standard LCBDE group (76.5 vs. 35.3 %; p?<?0.05). One procedure (5.9 %) in the SILCBDE group was converted to a four-incision transcystic LCBDE. The complication rate was 11.8 % (two patients) in the standard LCBDE group and 5.9 % (one patient) in the SILCBDE group. The average follow-up period was 4.2 months.

Conclusion

SILCBDE is as safe and efficacious as standard LCBDE in experienced hands. Choledochoscope manipulation and bile duct repair are the key skills. Long-term follow-up and further prospective randomized trials are anticipated.