Withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil in stable renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been demonstrated to decrease episodes of acute rejection in renal transplant recipients during the first year after transplantation. The utility of MMF after 1 year is less clear. METHODS: Forty-five stable renal transplant recipients on maintenance therapy of cyclosporine microemulsion, MMF, and prednisone had MMF withdrawn at approximately 1 year after transplantation. A matching concurrent group of 45 stable renal transplant recipients served as the case control group. RESULTS: Two of 45 patients in the MMF withdrawal group suffered an acute rejection episode as opposed to 1 of 45 in the control group. Both patients who rejected in the withdrawal group had adequate cyclosporine levels and had no recent decrease in prednisone dose. There was no evidence of an increased incidence of proteinuria or increased creatinine levels in the MMF withdrawal group. CONCLUSION: In general, withdrawal of MMF in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated. No increased risk of rejection could be demonstrated in this patient group. A larger study will be needed to confirm our result.     

Prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in kidney recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine

Our transplant centre began a prospective, randomized trial of steroid withdrawal in low risk renal transplant recipients on triple immunosuppression consisting of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), microemulsion cyclosporine (CSA), and prednisone. One hundred and twenty patients were randomized either to discontinue or remain on steroids (60 patients per group). Study design consisted of analyses of 1-yr outcomes after study entry. This report includes the 1-yr results plus results at last follow-up (mean follow-up 3.7 yr). There were no significant differences in rates of patient and graft survival at 1 yr or at last follow-up. Additionally, the incidences of acute and chronic rejection as well as graft function were the same at 1 yr and at last follow-up. Significant improvement was noted in total serum cholesterol and bone density at 1 yr and last follow-up. Initial improvement in patient weight at 1 yr was not sustained at last follow-up. No significant impact of steroid withdrawal on serum triglycerides, blood pressure, or post-transplant diabetes mellitus was observed. To date, we have observed no immunologic risk, and some significant benefit in regards to side effects, of steroid withdrawal between 6 and 36 months after transplantation in low risk renal transplant recipients maintained on prednisone, MMF, and microemulsion CSA. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal in low risk kidney transplant recipients is safe and ameliorates many of the unwanted sides effects of steroid use.     

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil on recurrent rejection in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable adjunctive agent in renal transplantation. However, due to intolerable adverse effects associated with MMF use in our transplant population, we have used MMF selectively in patients at high risk for recurrent graft rejection, since these patients are known to be at risk for poor long-term graft outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of MMF in preventing the recurrence of acute rejection following an initial rejection episode in kidney transplant patients in the first year following transplantation. METHODS: Forty-four kidney transplant recipients were given MMF prospectively following treatment of their initial rejection episode to prevent recurrent rejection. MMF 1-2 g/d was given. Doses were adjusted based on tolerance; MMF therapy was to be continued for at least 6 months. The control group consisted of 124 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who had received standard anti-rejection therapy without the addition of MMF. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted predominantly of cyclosporine, prednisone+/-azathioprine. Anti-rejection therapy for both groups consisted of either corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 500 mg i.v. for 3 d or oral prednisone 2 mg/kg/d with rapid taper over 3 wk), OKT3 5 mg/d for 10 d or ATG 15 mg/kg/d for 10 d. All rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: The majority of rejection episodes were characterized histologically as mild or moderate. Most patients (76%) received corticosteroids for treatment of their first rejection episode. There was a 68% reduction in the incidence of recurrent rejection episodes within the first year of transplant in patients receiving MMF; only 14% of recipients receiving MMF developed recurrent rejection compared to 44% of patients in the control group (p<0.05). Approximately 50% of patients developed MMF-associated adverse effects (leukopenia, GI toxicity). Only 52% of patients remained on MMF at 6 months. One-yr graft survival was 86% in the MMF group and 89% in the control group (p>0.05). One-year patient survival was 93 and 100%, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MMF to maintenance therapy for patients experiencing acute renal allograft rejection may prevent recurrent rejection episodes in the subsequent follow-up year.     

Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the first year after renal allograft transplantation, triple therapy immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), prednisone (P), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to a triple therapy treatment that includes azathioprine (AZA) instead of MMF. Whether long-term treatment with CsA-P-MMF is better than treatment with CsA-P-AZA is a matter of debate, as 3-year graft survival is similar in MMF- and AZA-treated patients. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of changing MMF to AZA in low-risk renal allograft recipients 6 months after transplantation. METHOD: This was a randomized, open-label single-centre study, recruiting 48 low risk renal allograft recipients on CsA-P-MMF therapy 6 months after transplantation, comparing the outcome with continued MMF treatment (2 g b.i.d.) (group A, n=22) or switching MMF to AZA (1 mg/kg) treatment (group B, n=26). RESULTS: The outcome after a 6-months follow-up of patients in group A and group B was similar. Treatment failure rates (defined as clinically diagnosed acute rejection episodes) were 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B. There were no patient deaths and no graft failures during the 6-months observation period. Graft function was excellent and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Replacing MMF with AZA 6 months after transplantation in low-risk renal allograft recipients is safe and is not associated with altered graft function in the short term.     

Late developing C4d-positive humoral renal allograft rejection associated with withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil

In renal transplantation, C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) usually develops in the early stage posttransplantation. It is clear C4d can be detected late after the operation, when it is associated with chronic renal allograft rejection. We report a case of a renal allograft recipient who experienced C4d-positive acute renal allograft rejection associated with withdrawal of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at 10 months after transplantation. This 21-year-old single male patient received his first cadaveric renal allograft under immunosuppression with cyclosporine, MMF, and prednisolone. The serum creatinine recovered to the normal range within 4 days. A protocol biopsy performed at 1 month after transplantation revealed no signs of rejection. The graft function was stable until 10 months postoperation, when MMF was converted to mizoribin. Three days later a biopsy showed a C4d-positive rejection. Patient had no response to the MMF combined with tacrolimus and steroid bolus therapy, which generally improves 85% of AHR among Chinese. He finally returned to dialysis. Our report suggested that C4d positive AHR may occur late after transplantation. MMF is important to suppress the body's humoral response to allograft; when MMF was converted to a weaker immunosuppressant, the dose of the other immunosuppressants (cyclosporine for example) must be adjusted properly.     

Selective use of mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant patients in Indian scenario

PURPOSE: Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable immunosuppressive in renal transplantation, its high cost demands that it be used selectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospectively study included 55 renal transplant patients on MMF for rescue therapy after treatment of acute vascular rejection (n = 45), acute/chronic liver disease with elevated transaminases (n = 4), early chronic rejection (n = 2), cyclosporine toxicity (n = 3), and cyclosporine-induced hemolytic-uremic syndrome (n = 1). The patients were given 1.5 to 2 g MMF in divided doses for at least 6 months, depending upon the tolerability, adverse effects, and finances, and followed for 1 year. The patients on MMF following treatment of acute rejections were compared with controls who received azathioprine-based triple immunosuppression after treatment of an acute rejection episode. RESULTS: The incidence of recurrent acute rejection in the first year was 18% in the MMF group compared to 42% in the control group (P < .005). The serum transaminases in the acute/chronic liver disease group reached normal levels at 3 to 6 months. The serum creatinine remained stable for a mean duration of 8 months in the early chronic rejection patients. The patients with cyclosporine toxicity showed stable graft function on low-dose cyclosporine. The patient with hemolytic-uremic syndrome showed stable graft function for 4 years. The MMF-based triple regimen is two times more expensive than an azathioprine-based regimen. CONCLUSION: MMF significantly decreases the recurrence of acute rejection. It is a good alternative agent in special situations like acute/chronic liver diseases with elevated transaminases, early chronic rejection, cyclosporine toxicity, and cyclosporine-induced hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Because of the high cost it should be used selectively in our population.     

Steroid withdrawal in renal transplant patients on triple therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Two previous meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials of steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation have shown significant increases in acute rejection (both analyses) and graft failure rates (the last analysis). A new examination of this topic including only randomized, controlled trials based on currently used, new, potent therapy with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), avoiding early trials with azathioprine, is justified. METHODS: Steroid withdrawal in patients on triple therapy including a calcineurin inhibitor and MMF was assessed through meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials in which intention-to-treat rates of acute rejection and renal allograft failure were established after steroid withdrawal or continuation. RESULTS: Six trials were included, four in patients receiving cyclosporine and two in patients receiving tacrolimus. The risk ratio (RR) for acute rejection was 2.28 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-3.16; P < 0.00001) and the pooled risk difference (RD) was 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.11; P < 0.001), indicating that the proportion of patients with acute rejection after prednisone withdrawal was significantly higher compared with controls. The RR for graft failure was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.42-1.28; P = 0.27) and the RD was -0.01 (95% CI, -0.03-0.01; P = 0.28), indicating that the proportion of patients with graft failure after withdrawal was not significantly different from that observed in controls. Total cholesterol was significantly lower after steroid withdrawal (weighted mean difference, -0.53 microM (95% CI, -0.70 to -0.36; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Renal allograft recipients on triple therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor, MMF, and steroids are at low but significant risk of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal but do not suffer an increased risk of early graft failure. It is necessary to extend controlled follow-up to confirm graft function stabilization.     

Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil in conjunction with stepwise withdrawal of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is now part of standard immunosuppression in the first phase after renal transplantation. A relevant question is if it can replace drugs such as cyclosporine (CsA) in the maintenance treatment, improving cardiovascular risk profile. METHODS: In 17 patients with a stable renal function (at least 6 months) posttransplantation, we studied the effect of CsA replacement by MMF. After starting MMF (1 g b.i.d.), CsA dosage was reduced from regular to low (median trough level 130 microg/L, respectively, 45 microg/L), followed by complete withdrawal, while prednisone (7.5 mg daily) was continued. We measured ambulatory blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, renal vascular resistance, and metabolic factors at start and after 8 weeks on regular, low-dose CsA, respectively, no CsA with MMF and prednisone. RESULTS: Two patients dropped out after the switch to low-dose CsA/MMF, due to diarrhea in one and a steroid responsive rejection in the other. The complete switch from CsA to MMF was successful in all 15 patients and accompanied by a decrease in 24 hr systolic blood pressure (from 152+/-13 to 145+/-13 mmHg; P<0.01), diastolic blood pressure (93+/-9 to 89+/-12 mmHg; P<0.05), RVR (0.29+/-0.06 to 0.25+/-0.09 mmHg.ml/min; P<0.05), and an increase in glomerular filtration rate (46.6+/-8.8 to 58.0+/-10.5 ml/min; P<0.01) and renal plasma flow. Intermediate low density lipoprotein-cholesterol decreased (0.79+/-0.37 to 0.41+/-0.16 mmol/L; P<0.01). High density lipoprotein-cholesterol decreased, but remained in the safe range. After 1 year two patients stopped the MMF; one because of Kaposi's sarcoma and one because of recurrent infections CONCLUSIONS: The stepwise switch from CsA to MMF was safe and mostly successful, and had beneficial effects on blood pressure, glomerular hemodynamics, and lipid profile. Beneficial trends were already present after partial withdrawal of CsA.     

Safe conversion of mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression

Aim:   Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a powerful immunosuppressive drug with established efficacy and safety. The long-term use of MMF may bring increased risk of for infection and malignancy and also increased cost of transplantation. The search for minimization of immunosuppressive protocol has led to an open randomized clinical trial of conversion from MMF to azathioprine (AZA).
Methods:   A total of 50 kidney allograft recipients treated with prednisone, sirolimus and MMF were randomized into two groups: converted (AZA group) and continuing (MMF group). The average duration of MMF therapy prior to conversion was 43 months in each group. Inclusion criteria included: patients with serum creatinine levels of less than 200 µmol/L; no past history of acute vascular rejection or recent acute rejection 6 months before randomization; and normal liver function tests.
Results:   Baseline demographics were similar in the two groups. During the 12 month observation period, there were no acute rejection episodes in either group. There were no significant differences in overall patient or graft survival or function. AZA-treated patients had a lower incidence of gastrointestinal complications ( P  = 0.03). Daily cost reduction in the AZA group was more than $US8.79/day per patient.
Conclusion:   In general, replacing MMF with AZA in stable renal transplant recipients is well tolerated and was cost effective with no increased risk of rejection. As the this study was on relatively small samples, larger and longer follow-up studies will be needed to confirm these expected advantages for the long-term outcome and to assess the long-term safety of this minimization of immunosuppressive therapy.     

Primary immunosuppression with mycophenolate mofetil and antithymocyte globulin for kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal graft

Background. In renal transplantation the beneficial immunosuppressive effects of cyclosporin (CsA) may be curtailed by its nephrotoxicity, specially in patients receiving a cadaveric allograft from suboptimal donors or at risk of delayed graft function. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have each demonstrated to be potent immunosuppressants in renal transplantation. In a prospective analysis we have studied the results at 6 months of the combination of MMF, ATG and low-dose steroids in patients with low immunological risk receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft from a suboptimal donor or at risk of delayed graft function. Methods. Patients with preformed reactive antibodies <50% receiving a first graft from a suboptimal donor (age ⩾40years, non-heart-beating, acute renal failure, arterial hypertension) or at risk of delayed graft function (cold ischaemia time ⩾24 h) were eligible for this open single-arm pilot trial. From September 1996 to March 1997 we recruited 17 patients. They were treated with MMF 2 g p.o. preoperatively, and after transplantation at 3 g/day; rabbit ATG i.v. at 2 mg/kg preoperatively, and 1.5 mg/kg/day the first day after transplantation, followed by four doses of 1 mg/kg on alternate days; prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day and reduced progressively to 0.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months. Primary outcomes were incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, delayed graft function, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and the need for introduction of CsA treatment. Results. Delayed graft function occurred in two cases (12%). Four of 17 patients (27%) had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (2 grade I and 2 grade II) within the first 3 months after transplantation. CsA was added in two cases with grade II biopsy-proven acute rejection, and in one with grade I biopsy-proven acute rejection. In one patient MMF was replaced by CsA because of gastrointestinal intolerance. Mean serum creatinine 6 months after transplantation was 159±59 &mgr;mol/l. Cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease occurred in one patient (6%). At 6 months follow-up all patients are alive with functioning allografts. Conclusions. These preliminary results suggest that in low-immunological-risk patients who receive a suboptimal renal allograft or at risk of delayed graft function, the combination of MMF, ATG, and steroids is an efficient immunosuppressive regime that may avoid the use of CsA in 70% of the recipients.     

Updated metaanalysis of steroid withdrawal in renal transplant patients on calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate mofetil

During the 1990s two metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials of steroid withdrawal after renal transplantation showed significant increases in acute rejection episodes and graft failure rates. A recently published metaanalysis of steroid withdrawal in patients on a calcineurin inhibitor and MMF included randomized clinical trials. We have updated this study, searching more publications during the last 2 years. Finally, the same six trials were included, four in patients receiving cyclosporine and two tacrolimus. Risk ratio (RR) for acute rejection was 2.28 [95%CI 1.65-3.16, P < .00001], and pooled risk difference (RD) was 0.08 [0.05-0.11, P < .001], indicating that the proportion of patients with acute rejection episodes after prednisone withdrawal was significantly higher compared with controls. RR for graft failure was 0.73 [0.42-1.28, P = .27], and RD was -0.01 [-0.03-0.01, P = .28], indicating that the proportion of patients with graft failure after withdrawal was not significantly different from that of controls. Total cholesterol was significantly lower after steroid withdrawal (weighted mean difference -0.53 mumol/L [-0.70--0.36, P < .0001]). Renal allograft recipients on triple therapy with a calcineurin inhibitor, MMF, and steroids are at low but significant risk of acute rejection after steroid withdrawal, but do not suffer an increased risk of early graft failure. It is necessary to extend controlled follow-up to confirm graft function stabilization.     

骁悉、环孢素A和泼尼松在肾移植受者联合应用中最适剂量探讨

目的探讨国人肾移植后骁悉(MMF)、环孢素A(CsA)和泼尼松(Pred)联合应用的最适剂量。方法比较常规剂量组(104例)和低剂量组(96例)患者肾移植术后免疫抑制剂用量和急性排斥反应、肺部感染发生率和人/移植肾生存率。结果MMF和CsA用量在术后3个月、Pred用量在术后6个月内常规剂量组明显高于低剂量组。常规剂量组在6个月内包括活检证实、临床推断和亚临床排斥,其总的急性排斥发生率为17.3%,而低剂量组为19.8%,两组间差异无显著性意义(P=0.55)。两组患者在6个月内肺部感染发生率分别为40.4%和11.5%(P<0.0001),尤其是重症肺部感染发生率常规剂量组明显要高(26.9%比5.2%,P<0.0001)。两组患者人/肾1年生存率分别为87.4%/85.5%和97.9%/96.9%(P均<0.01)。排除感染所致的带功死亡后两组患者人/肾1年生存率差异无显著性意义。结论低剂量MMF、CsA和Pred联合应用并不增加急性排斥率、亚临床排斥发生率、排斥治疗逆转率和排斥反应的严重程度,但明显降低肺部感染发生率和病死率。     

Comparison of transplanted kidney function in patients on two different doses of mycophenolate mofetil

INTRODUCTION: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an immunosuppressant that is widely used in renal transplant recipients, is associated with several dose-dependent hematologic and gastrointestinal side effects that lead to drug dose reduction or even discontinuation. The aim of this study was to compare the renal function and acute rejection rates of kidney allograft recipients who were on two different mycophenolate mofetil doses. METHODS: In a prospective study, 59 allograft kidney recipients who were on MMF 2 g/d were randomly selected and followed for evidences of acute rejection or drug side effects. Four patients were excluded from the study due to noncompliance, graft loss, and patient loss from opportunistic infection. Of the remaining 55 patients, 22 patients (40%) underwent MMF dose reduction to 1.35 +/- 0.23 g/d due to perceived side effects or economic reasons (group 1). The mean time for this change was 4.2 +/- 2.1 months after the kidney transplantation. The remaining patients (group 2, n = 33, 60%) had no change in MMF 2 g/d drug dosage. All patients were followed for at least 30 months after transplantation. Renal function tests (blood urea and serum creatinine) were measured monthly. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 11.0 (Student t test). A P value < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable regarding age, gender, other immunosuppressive medications, and the time after transplantation. There were no episodes of acute rejection in group 1 after MMF dose reduction. The renal function (blood urea or serum creatinine levels) was comparable between the two groups at the end of study (P = .846 and .610, respectively). CONCLUSION: MMF dose reduction was not associated with an increased risk of acute renal allograft rejection or impaired graft function.     

The use of mycophenolate mofetil suspension in pediatric renal allograft recipients

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used to prevent acute rejection in adults after renal, cardiac, and liver transplantation. This study investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of MMF suspension in pediatric renal allograft recipients. One hundred renal allograft recipients were enrolled into three age groups (33 patients, 3 months to <6 years; 34 patients, 6 to <12 years; 33 patients, 12 to 18 years). Patients received MMF 600 mg/m² b.i.d. concomitantly with cyclosporine and corticosteroids with or without antilymphocyte antibody induction. One year after transplantation, patient and graft survival (including death) were 98% and 93%, respectively. Twenty-five patients (25%) experienced a biopsy-proven (Banff grade borderline or higher) or presumptive acute rejection within the first 6 months post-transplantation. Analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters for mycophenolic acid (MPA) and mycophenolic acid glucuronide showed no clinically significant differences among the age groups. The dosing regimen of MMF 600 mg/m² b.i.d. achieved the targeted early post-transplantation MPA 12-h area under concentration-time curve (AUC_0–12) of 27.2 μg h per ml. Adverse events had similar frequencies among the age groups (with the exception of diarrhea, leukopenia, sepsis, and anemia, which were more frequent in the <6 years age group) and led to withdrawal of MMF in about 10% of patients. Administration of MMF 600 mg/m² b.i.d. is effective in prevention of acute rejection, provides predictable pharmacokinetics, and is associated with an acceptable safety profile in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Received: 7 May 2001 / Revised: 16 July 2001 / Accepted: 16 July 2001     

Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in high-risk renal allograft recipients on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression

OBJECTIVE: In a randomized control trial of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) with cyclosporine and steroids, we demonstrated that MMF reduced acute rejection (AR) among renal allograft recipients (RTX) who were of low to moderate risk. However, 10% had AR when converted from MMF to AZA at 6 months, postrenal transplantation (RT). Two clinical markers, abnormal serum creatinine (SCr) and proteinuria at 6 months, post-RT, were associated with AR postconversion. The present study examined the safety of such conversion in selected high-risk RTX at 1 year of MMF therapy. METHODS: Thirteen high-risk RTX receiving MMF for either high panel reactive antibody (n = 9) or following AR (n = 4), with normal SCr and no proteinuria at 1 year, were selected for conversion. The incidence of AR, adverse events, and renal parameters (SCr, creatinine clearance, proteinuria) at 6 months postconversion was evaluated. Eight high-risk RTX who did not meet these selection criteria were retrospectively reviewed and used as controls. RESULTS: Renal parameters (SCr 123 +/- 26 vs 129 +/- 27 mumol/L; pre- vs postconversion) were not significantly different; no episodes of AR or proteinuria were documented. Azathioprine was discontinued in two patients due to leukopenia. In the control group, one patient had graft loss from chronic rejection, whereas one developed posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease necessitating MMF withdrawal. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that selective conversion from MMF to AZA after 1 year is safe, even in high-risk RTX. Normal SCr and absence of proteinuria are good screening parameters to identify patients at low risk for AR following such conversion.     

Reversal of chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after heart transplantation-potential role of mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity (CCN) after heart transplantation is a progressive condition that may lead to end-stage renal failure. The extent to which CCN is reversible with reduction or withdrawal of cyclosporine therapy is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the reversibility of CCN and to assess the safety and efficacy of a strategy of cyclosporine dosage reduction, combined with conversion from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil (AZA/MMF switch) to maintain immunosuppression. METHODS: An AZA/MMF switch followed by cyclosporine dose reduction was undertaken in 30 heart transplant recipients (23 men, 7 women; mean age, 54 +/- 2 years) with established CCN at a mean of 90 +/- 9 months after transplantation (range, 17-182 months). The mean maintenance MMF dosage was 2.3 +/- 0.1 g/day (n = 28). Mean cyclosporine dosage was decreased from 2.3 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day before AZA/MMF switch to 1.6 +/- 0.2 mg/kg/day. RESULTS: Three patients (10%) were withdrawn from MMF, 2 because of diarrhea and the third because of severe pneumonia that developed within 2 weeks of AZA/MMF switch. All 3 were restabilized with AZA. One patient (4%) experienced acute rejection 7 months after AZA/MMF switch. This resolved after an oral pulse of prednisolone. Systemic infections occurred in 6 patients within 12 months of AZA/MMF switch. Actuarial survival 1 year after AZA/MMF switch was 86% +/- 6%. One patient died of infection and 3 of other causes. Serum creatinine concentration decreased from 248 +/- 15 micromol/liter before cyclosporine dosage reduction to 193 +/- 11 micromol/liter and 206 +/- 19 micromol/liter at 3 and 12 months after dosage reduction (both p < 0.01 versus baseline, n = 23). Of the 23 patients who remained on MMF at 12 months, a decrease in serum creatinine was documented in 19 (83%). Four patients showed no improvement or showed deterioration in renal function, and three of these progressed to end-stage renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic cyclosporine nephrotoxicity has a significant reversible component in most patients. A strategy of AZA/MMF switch combined with cyclosporine dosage reduction is generally well tolerated and results in short-term improvement in renal function in most patients. Close vigilance is required during the first 12 months after AZA/MMF switch because both acute rejection and infection may occur.     

Randomized, prospective trial of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND: In simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) transplantation, manifestations of renal allograft rejection typically become evident before those of pancreatic rejection. This study compared mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in prevention of renal rejection after primary SPK transplantation. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, multicenter study, patients received MMF 1.5 g twice daily (n=74) or AZA 1-3 mg/kg daily (n=76) for 1 year after transplantation. The incidence of rejection was assessed at 6 months. Adverse events were tracked through 1 year. Survival data are reported through 2 years. RESULTS: At 6 months, efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: rejection (27% vs. 39%); rejection or death (34% vs. 42%); rejection, graft loss, death, or premature withdrawal (i.e., treatment failure; 41% vs. 55%). Six-month efficacy trends favored MMF, and time to rejection or treatment failure was significantly longer when compared with AZA (P=0.049). One-year efficacy results for MMF vs. AZA patients, respectively, were the following: treatment of renal rejection (35% vs. 47%); renal allograft loss or death (9% vs. 12%); pancreas allograft loss or death (15% vs. 14%). Five MMF patients (7%) and four (5%) in the AZA group died. More MMF than AZA patients developed opportunistic infections (54% vs. 38%), but the pathogens did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Trends for most efficacy parameters favored MMF over AZA, and time to renal allograft rejection or treatment failure was statistically significantly longer for MMF. The use of MMF in the treatment of SPK recipients is a useful advance.     

Disseminated varicella infection in pediatric renal transplant recipients treated with mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new immune suppressive agent, effective in the prevention of acute rejection after renal transplantation. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of records of pediatric renal transplant recipients from 1985 to the present. RESULTS: Since October 1995, the immune suppression protocol for pediatric renal transplant recipients at Mayo Eugenio Litta Children's Hospital has included MMF, prednisone, and cyclosporine A. During that time, 19 children and adolescents have received renal allografts, 17 of whom were seropositive for varicella antibody before transplantation, while 2 were seronegative. Varicella infection occurred in 3 of 19 patients (15.8%), all 3 of whom had serologically documented immunity to varicella virus before transplantation. All episodes occurred within 12 months of transplantation. All had generalized vesicular lesions without dermatomal distribution. None of the patients developed fever, respiratory, mucocutaneous, or central nervous system manifestations. All were managed with oral acyclovir, and had an uncomplicated recovery without neuralgia. By contrast, of 74 consecutive patients transplanted before use of MMF, only 1 patient (1.4%) had varicella infection after transplantation (P=0.026). CONCLUSION: The enhanced immunosuppression achieved with MMF appears to be associated with increased susceptibility to varicella infection.     

Mycophenolate mofetil in pediatric renal transplantation without induction therapy: results after 12 months of treatment. German Pediatric Renal Transplantation Study Group

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection episodes (ARE) of kidney transplants are considered as risk factor in the development of chronic rejection. In adult renal transplantation (RTx), ARE have been significantly reduced by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with cyclosporin (CyA) and steroids (Pred). Reports of pediatric RTx on a maintenance immunosuppression with MMF are restricted to patients (P) after antibody induction therapy. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of MMF combined with CyA and Pred in pediatric RTx without induction therapy were evaluated in an open-labeled multicenter study. RESULTS: From 10/1996 to 6/1999, 65 pediatric P (MMF group) were followed for at least 6 months, 58 of 65 for 12 months. These P were compared with 54 retrospectively analyzed pediatric P who were transplanted between 1990 and 1996 and had received CyA, Pred, and azathioprine for immunosuppression (historic AZA group). Within the first 6 months after RTx, 18 of 65 (MMF group) and 32 of 54 (historic AZA group) P showed clinical signs of acute rejection (P<0.01). Thereafter only one further P in the MMF group developed a first ARE. Graft loss due to rejection occurred in one MMF- and seven AZA-treated P (P<0.05). The creatinine-clearance 3 and 6 months after RTx was higher in the MMF group. Major adverse events (MMF group) included infections of the urinary and the upper respiratory tract, diarrhea, and leukopenia. Cytomegalovirus-infection occurred in 13 P and 2 P developed cytomegalovirus disease. One P developed PTLD 10 months after RTx and recovered after the reduction of immunosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of MMF, CyA, and Pred reduced ARE in pediatric RTx without incurring major side effects.     

Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil versus azathioprine after renal transplantation: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate acid (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The following electronic databases were searched: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were subjected to Revman 4.11 for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs were identified to compare MMF and AZA for antirejection, prophylaxis after renal transplantation. The data showed that MMF (2 g/d) was more beneficial than AZA to improve graft and long-term patient survivals, but there was no statistical differences between MMF (3 g/d) and AZA. Whether at 6 months or at 1 year after renal transplantation, the use of MMF (2 g/d) or MMF (3 g/d) markedly reduced the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection. CONCLUSION: Compared with AZA, MMF is a more potent immunosuppressive drug, that is more efficient in reducing the incidence of acute rejection episodes after renal transplantation. MMF can improve the graft and patient survival rate. The 2 g per day dosage is more acceptable.