急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤的原因和处理

目的探讨急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC）胆管损伤的预防和处理。方法回顾性分析我院1999年10月～2008年10月368例急性胆囊炎行LC导致胆管损伤7例的临床资料,根据胆管损伤轻重采取修补或胆总管空肠Roux—en—Y吻合术,并置T管引流。结果5例术中发现胆管损伤均中转开腹,其中1例胆总管横行剪断和1例电灼伤分别于术后12、3个月拔除T管后出现胆管狭窄,再次手术行胆肠Roux—en-Y吻合术治愈;2例电钩伤行胆管修补、T管引流3个月造影示无狭窄拔管治愈;1例胆总管破损严重行胆总管空肠Roux—en—Y吻合术并置T管支撑引流,住院2周带管出院,1个月后经T管胆肠造影显示通畅拔管痊愈。2例术后3～5d出现黄疸,内镜逆行胰胆管造影提示1例胆管狭窄,1例胆管完全闭锁,开腹探查证实为胆总管完全夹闭、肝总管部分夹闭各1例,分别行胆管空肠Roux—en-Y吻合术并置T管支撑引流术治愈。7例随访0．5～6年,平均3．4年,无胆管狭窄、残余结石等并发症发生。无一例死亡。结论只要正确把握手术时机、掌握好手术技巧、及时正确的中转开腹,急性胆囊炎行LC胆管损伤可避免或减少。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术中右肝管分支损伤的预防和治疗(附7例分析)

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中右肝管分支损伤的预防和治疗。方法:回顾分析本院近4年LC术中发生之右肝管分支损伤的诊断和治疗过程及随访情况。结果:2001年5月至2005年4月,我院行LC术中发现或术后发生胆漏、经造影证实为右肝管分支损伤者共7例,其中男2例、女5例。7例均属选择性手术,其中6例呈胆囊周围慢性炎症,粘连明显,5例在术中放置了双腔引流管,术后发现有胆汁引出。另2例系在术中发现于胆囊管切断后,肝面有胆汁溢出;当即中转开腹,行术中造影,发现为右肝管分支畸形受损,直径分别为0.3cm和0.4cm,予对端吻合;置T管作为内支撑,经胆总管引出。5例在术中放置双套引流管的病例中,1例因每日持续有20～100ml胆汁引出,于术后3个月行右肝管鄄空肠Roux鄄en鄄γ吻合,吻合口直径达1cm;4例分别在术后引流1～3个月后自行闭合,并无任何临床症状,肝功能无异常。2例在术中放置内支撑者,于术后9个月拔除T鄄管,恢复良好。结论:右肝管分支的损伤往往与胆囊三角的慢性炎症程度、胆道系统的解剖变异、手术操作不当等因素有关。对术后发现胆漏者,经通畅的引流治疗1～3个月后,大部病例可以治愈,不需进行第2次手术,对引流超过3个月不愈者,需再次手术。     

Managing bile duct injury during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is now the treatment of choice for gallstones, but there has been concern that bile leakage after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy is more frequent than after an open cholecystectomy. We have experienced 16 patients with bile duct injury after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Five patients had a circumferential injurury to the major bile duct, and we employed a converted open technique for biliary reconstruction. The other 11 patients had partial injurury to the major bile duct, and we performed laparoscopic restoration; all 11 of these patients received endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) on the day after the operation and stenting for biliary decompression and drainage. No complications were identified and the duration of hospitalization in these patients was significantly shorter than in those who had the converted procedure. If intraoperative cholangiography is performed routinely, the presence and form of bile duct injury can be clearly identified, and the decision to restore the site of injury or to convert to the open technique for biliary reconstruction can be made immediately. Received for publication on May 26, 1998; accepted on Aug. 28, 1998     

Biliary leakage following T-tube removal

This study evaluates the incidence of biliary leakage following T-tube removal from the common bile duct (CBD) in 97 patients who underwent open CBD exploration. In 93 patients, this was following exploration for CBD stones, in two patient it was for obstructive jaundice due to hydatid disease and in a further two patients it was following CBD injury. T-tube cholangiography (TTC) was carried out 7-10 days postoperatively and, if the examination was normal, the T-tube was removed 12-14 days postoperatively (2 months for the CBD injury patients). Following T-tube removal, six patients developed severe abdominal pain, sweating and tachycardia. They were treated with antibiotics, parenteral fluids, and analgesia. Three patients settled with this management. Two patients developed sub-hepatic collections and required open drainage. One patient developed a small pelvic collection, which was aspirated transvaginally. A seventh patient was re-admitted 2 weeks following T-tube removal and laparotomy revealed biliary peritonitis. The patient died the following day. Biliary leakage following removal of a T-tube is not uncommon. It has a significant morbidity and mortality. Our experience and that of the reviewed literature suggests that the aetiology is multifactorial. The management and outcome of this complication is discussed.     

腹腔镜胆道手术中Luschka管损伤致胆漏的防治

目的:探讨腹腔镜胆道手术中Luschka管损伤的诊断、治疗及预防方法。方法:回顾分析3例腹腔镜胆道手术中Luschka管损伤病例的临床资料。结果:3例患者术前影像学检查均未发现胆道变异情况,均于腹腔镜胆道手术中出现Luschka管损伤,其中2例患者用电钩电切剥离胆囊床,术中发现胆漏,进一步检查发现Luschka管损伤,用可吸收线缝合Luschka管,术后未发生胆漏;1例患者术中用超声刀剥离胆囊床,未发现明显胆漏,术后2 d出现腹痛、黄疸,诊断性腹腔穿刺抽出胆汁,经十二指肠镜逆行胰胆管造影检查证实Luschka管损伤,经腹腔穿刺置管引流+鼻胆管引流术治疗后治愈出院。术后随诊6个月,均未发现胆道狭窄、胆漏、腹腔脓肿等并发症。结论:腹腔镜胆道手术中Luschka胆管损伤难以避免,熟悉解剖、术中提高警惕是防范腹腔镜胆道手术中Luschka胆管损伤的关键。     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术胆管损伤的处理

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy，LC）中胆管损伤的处理。方法回顾分析我院1992年3月-2006年10月8876例LC中16例胆管损伤的临床资料，其中胆总管横行剪断4例，电灼伤3例，胆总管部分撕裂伤4例，钛夹误夹5例。胆管裂口修补，T管支撑引流6例；游离两断端，行端端吻合，T管支撑引流3例；胆管空肠Roux—en—Y吻合5例；去肽夹2例。结果1例胆总管横行剪断后行胆管端端吻合，置T管支撑引流3个月，T管拔除3～5个月后因胆管狭窄，再次行胆管空肠Roux—en—Y吻合，术后未出现因胆管狭窄所引起阻塞性黄疸。2例因胆管空肠吻合口狭窄，分别于术后9、11个月再次行胆管空肠Roux—en—Y吻合，再手术后随访2～4年，未出现胆管炎症状、结石再形成。1例胆管完全性夹闭后行胆管空肠Roux—en-Y吻合术后胆道感染，反复发作。余12例均一次性临床治愈，其中10例随访3～4年，未出现任何不适。结论胆管损伤是LC的主要并发症，早期预防和积极处理胆管损伤是防止多次胆道手术的重要举措。     

胆囊结石合并胆总管结石260例报告

目的总结腹腔镜胆囊切除联合胆总管探查术(laparoscopic common bile duct exploration,LCBDE)治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的经验。方法 2005年1月~2008年5月对260例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石行腹腔镜胆囊切除联合LCBDE,全麻后平卧位,采用四孔法。游离胆囊管及胆囊动脉后施血管夹后夹闭,显露胆总管,电凝钩切开胆总管长度约1.5~2.5 cm,取出胆管结石放置于标本袋内,胆道镜检查无结石残留,置入T管于胆总管内间断缝合固定。切除胆囊,取出胆囊、标本袋,经T管注水检查无渗漏,放置腹腔引流,缝合切口。结果成功254例,成功率97.7%(254/260),手术时间70~230 min,平均126 min。中转开腹6例:3例因胆囊三角纤维化严重,呈"冰冻状",无法解剖而中转开腹;1例术中证实Mirizzi综合征而中转开腹;1例因结石嵌顿于胆总管下段无法镜下取出而中转开腹;1例剥离胆囊床时位置靠深,损伤肝中静脉分支,出血汹涌而中转开腹。术后3例出现胆漏,经保守治疗后2~6 d痊愈。1例胆管充满泥沙样结石术后并发寒战、高热,体温高达41.0℃,抗感染、对症治疗体温正常。1例术后3周经T管造影检查证实残留结石1枚,8周后经窦道用胆道镜取出结石。254例术后住院时间6~19 d,平均9 d。223例随访13~24个月,平均16个月,无胆道狭窄等并发症出现,1例术后22个月出现腹痛、黄疸、高热,MRCP证实胆道结石复发,经EST取出结石。结论严格筛选病例,熟练掌握软硬镜技术及细致的术中操作是开展此手术的关键。     

腹腔镜下经胆囊管肝总管汇合部微切开胆总管探查的可行性

目的探讨腹腔镜下经胆囊管肝总管汇合部微切开胆总管探查免置T管的可行性及病例选择。方法回顾性分析我院2009年1月至2011年12月期间52例拟行胆总管探查患者的临床资料,实施了经腹腔镜、胆道镜双镜联合下经胆囊管肝总管汇合部微（3～4mm）切开取石、不放置T管引流,一期缝合。结果本组52例患者术中无阴性探查,术中使用胆道镜及胆道造影检查证实结石完全取出,结石取净率为100％,手术时间为90～200min,平均100min。术中胆道造影时间为3～10min,平均6min。胆道镜协助取石时间为5～15min,平均8min。术后腹腔引流管拔管时间3～5d,平均3．5d。术后腹腔引流液量为20～60mL／d,平均30mL／d。术后无胆汁漏、腹痛、黄疸及切口感染发生。术后住院5～12d,平均6．5d。术后随访时间为3～40个月,平均20个月,无结石再生或胆管狭窄发生。结论若术者腹腔镜、胆道镜技术熟练,手术病例选择适当,术中检查仔细,冲洗干净,经胆囊管肝总管汇合部微切开取石后行胆总管一期缝合是安全、可行的。     

Delayed cholangitis resulting from a retained T-tube fragment encased within a stone: a rare complication

Inserting a T-tube after choledochotomy for the removal of bile duct stones remains a time-honored practice. Biliary drainage after bile duct exploration has some advantages. It minimizes bile leakage, provides access for cholangiography, and removes occasional retained stones. The use of T-tubes also has been associated with significant complications. Biliary sepsis, bile duct trauma during removal, bile leakage leading to peritonitis, retention of a fragment, stricture formation after removal have been reported. We report an unusual case of cholangitis caused by a T-tube fragment within a large stone, occurring 11 years after bile duct exploration. A 39-year-old woman underwent common bile duct exploration with insertion of a T-tube. Cholangiography was normal, but as the T-tube was removed, its horizontal limb was missing. The patient failed to present for endoscopic removal a few weeks after surgery Five years later, she presented with recurrent biliary pains and a mild episode of cholangitis. This last episode was associated with severe pain and jaundice. After initial conservative treatment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed, and endoscopic removal of the fragment and stone material was successful. Despite the declining numbers of bile duct explorations in the laparoscopic era and the tendency to use transcystic drainage or primary closure of a choledochotomy, the T-tube will continue to be a useful tool in biliary surgery, subject to consideration of the indications and the available alternatives. The reported case highlights the importance of careful tube preparation to prevent partial separation at removal, and early removal of a missing fragment to avoid potential serious complications.     

萎缩性胆囊炎106例腹腔镜手术治疗

目的总结腹腔镜下萎缩性胆囊炎手术治疗的技巧及经验。方法 2000年2月～2010年1月对106例萎缩性胆囊炎行三孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术。结果腹腔镜胆囊切除88例,胆囊大部切除12例,6例行中转开腹胆囊切除（3例因Calot三角致密粘连、解剖不清,胆囊管无法分离,中转开腹胆囊切除;2例胆囊与周围组织致密粘连,分离后见十二指肠内瘘形成,修补;1例胆囊颈部结石压迫右肝管造成右肝管穿孔,行胆管整形T管引流术,T管12个月后拔除）。术后胆漏5例,保持腹腔引流通畅,术后7～10 d拔除引流管。106例随访3～24个月：1例中转开腹行胆管整形T管引流术,术后12个月T管造影显示胆管黏膜连续性正常,顺利拔除;4例出现轻度腹泻,术后3个月内症状逐渐消失;2例术后轻度腹胀,对症治疗后好转;均无胆管狭窄、肠梗阻等术后并发症。结论在细致操作及熟练的腹腔镜技术前提下,萎缩性胆囊炎腹腔镜手术是安全、可行的,但Calot三角冰冻样粘连、腹腔致密粘连或内瘘形成等复杂情况是中转开腹手术的指征。     

Treatment of iatrogenic common bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy through the laparoscopic insertion of a T-tube stent

Summary Iatrogenic injury to the common bile duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy has previously necessitated an immediate laparotomy to alleviate bile leakage. In the course of 171 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed at our hospital, intraoperative common bile duct injuries occurred in 2 patients. Each case was successfully treated using a laparoscopically placed T-tube, thus avoiding the need for a laparotomy. This novel intraoperative procedure successfully treated common bile duct injuries without resulting in postoperative complications.     

Laparoscopic management of bile duct and bowel injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Accidental injuries to the bile duct and bowel are significant risks of laparoscopic surgery and sometimes require conversion to open surgery. Although some of the injuries related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be managed by endoscopic techniques, laparoscopic surgery is not yet sufficiently perfected. We investigated the efficacy of laparoscopic management combined with endoscopic tube or stent insertion in cases of bile duct and bowel injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted on 1,190 consecutive patients between April 1992 and June 1999. The first 70 patients underwent only preoperative intravenous infusion cholangiography (IVC), and the remaining 1,120 patients were subjected to both preoperative IVC and intraoperative cholangiography. We experienced 16 cases of bile duct injury (1.4%). Five patients with circumferential injuries of the bile duct were converted to open surgery for biliary reconstruction. The other 11 patients with partial laceration injuries of the bile duct and biliary leakage from the cystic duct underwent a laparoscopic simple closure technique. In 10 of these patients, an endoscopic tube or stent was inserted on the day after surgery to facilitate biliary decompression and drainage. Bowel injuries occurred in seven patients (0.6%). Three intestinal injuries were due to careless technique, and two duodenal injuries and two intestinal injuries were related to dense adhesions. All of these injuries were successfully repaired using laparoscopic techniques, autosuturing devices, or extracorporeal suturing via the umbilical incision. No postoperative complications were identified. We concluded that the biliary injury site could be closed with a laparoscopic technique so long as the biliary injury was not circumferential. Bowel injuries also could be repaired laparoscopically.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性迷走胆管漏的预防及处理

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性迷走胆管漏的诊断、治疗及经验教训。方法对1997年2月～2009年8月13例LC后迟发性迷走胆管漏,分别采用开腹胆总管切开、T管引流（1例）,超声定位下腹腔置管引流术（2例）及超声定位下腹腔置管联合ERCP、ENBD（10例）3种方法进行治疗。结果 13例经腹部B超及腹腔穿刺后确诊为迟发性迷走胆管漏,1例因休克急诊行开腹胆总管切开、T管引流术,2例行腹部B超定位下腹腔置管引流术,10例行腹部B超定位下腹腔置管引流、ENBD。2例选择胆囊窝积液区穿刺腹腔置管及ENBD后腹部症状及体征未完全消失,复查腹部B超仍提示腹腔积液,在超声定位下取右下腹麦氏点穿刺置管引流后胆漏停止、腹部症状及体征完全消失。1例迷走胆管漏并发休克,纠正休克后急诊行腹腔探查、胆管切开引流术,术中出现呼吸、心跳骤停,心肺复苏成功,术中经胆总管注水发现胆囊床有直径约0.2mm胆管漏胆,放置T管缝合管壁后,T管缝线针眼渗胆,术后再次出现胆漏,经充分引流等治疗32 d后痊愈。腹部B超定位下腹腔置管引流术,治愈时间12、15 d,平均13.5 d。腹部B超定位下腹腔置管引流、ENBD,治愈时间2～5 d,平均2.8 d。12例随访12～24个月,平均15个月,无胆道狭窄、肠梗阻、胆管结石及其他并发症出现。结论 采用腹部B超定位下腹腔穿刺置管引流联合ENBD胆管减压治疗LC后迷走胆管漏,能达到开腹手术引流胆汁、胆道减压的效果,且具有创伤小,痛苦少,恢复快及住院时间短等优点,值得推广应用。     

术中胆道造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中应用价值

目的探讨术中胆道造影在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的应用价值。方法腹腔镜胆囊切除术中在切除胆囊前,常规在C型臂X线下行胆道造影,并及时采集、保存图像,以了解肝外胆管内有无结石存在。若发现结石,继而行中转开腹胆总管探查取石术。结果施行的76例术中胆道造影中,发现胆总管结石5例,其中胆总管下段多发结石2例,胆总管内单发结石2例,胆总管内一长柱状结石1例。5例胆总管结石取出术后均放置T型管,随访T管造影复查,未见结石残留。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术常规行术中胆道造影可有效地防止胆道结石残留,避免了不必要的胆管探查,减少了胆管损伤和术后并发症的发生,减少了患者的住院费用和住院时间,且术中胆道造影操作简单、迅速、安全,除有禁忌证外,应常规应用术中胆道造影。     

Clip migration causes choledocholithiasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The migration of surgical clips after laparoscopic procedures was first reported in 1992, but such instances are extremely rare. We herein demonstrate a case of a migrated metal clip, which had been applied originally to the cystic duct, but thereafter had moved to the common bile duct. This clip caused choledocholithiasis in a patient 1 year after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A 63-year-old man underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. During the operation, the inflamed cystic duct was divided accidentally, and three clips were applied immediately. The patient complained of upper abdominal pain from postoperative day 8. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography demonstrated bile leakage from the cystic duct, but showed no clips or choledochal stones. The patient complained of severe upper abdominal and back pain 1 year after the operation. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography showed a metal clip in the common bile duct and choledochal stones above the clip. The clip and the cholesterol stones were removed using a basket catheter. Three clips applied to the cystic duct should have been removed because of the necrosis in the remaining cystic duct. Thereafter, the clip may have migrated through the stump of the cystic duct into the lower part of the common bile duct. This clip seems to have later caused choledocholithiasis resulting from stagnation of the bile flow. Bile leakage after an operation seems to increase the risk of clip migration. Regardless of the primary lesion, a careful follow-up evaluation is necessary for patients demonstrating complications.     

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后迟发性胆漏12例报告

目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术（laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC）后迟发性胆漏的原因、预防及处理措施。方法对我院1994年11月～2007年12月11000例LC后出现迟发性胆漏12例的发生机制、发病特点、处理方法及预后进行回顾性分析。结果热电效应引起的胆管穿孔性损伤8例,迷走胆管漏2例,原因不详2例。经B超引导下置管引流4例,镜下及开腹修补联合T管引流3例,腹穿联合鼻胆管引流（endoscopic nasobiliary drainage,ENBD）3例,腹穿联合胆道内支架（endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage,ERBD）1例,开腹胆总管空肠吻合术1例。所有病人均治愈出院,住院时间8～21d,平均15d。无腹腔感染、出血、再次胆漏、肠漏等并发症。引流术后10d左右复查B超或造影显示胆道无狭窄、扩张,造影剂排泄通畅。12例随访1年,无胆管狭窄及胆道感染的临床症状。结论热电效应引起胆管损伤是LC后迟发性胆漏的主要原因;术中操作轻柔,严格按解剖层次分离,是预防术后迟发性胆漏的关键;内镜和介入治疗是诊断及治疗迟发性胆漏的主要方法,有其独到的优势。     

29例医源性胆管损伤手术疗效的临床分析

目的:探讨医源性胆管损伤的手术时机与修复方式,以期提高术后的远期疗效。方法:回顾性分析1999年1月至2010年12月我院收治的29例医源性胆管损伤病人的临床资料,并对所有病人手术修复后进行随访。结果:根据2008年中华医学会外科学分会胆道外科学组制定的《胆管损伤的预防与治疗指南》中胆管损伤的分型,29例胆管损伤中Ⅰ型损伤3例,Ⅱ1型22例,Ⅱ2型3例,Ⅱ3型1例。即时修复12例,早期修复(两周以内)6例,延期修复(6-8周)11例。修复手术方式有迷走胆管结扎术1例,胆总管修补术1例,胆管修补加T管引流术9例,胆管端端吻合加T管引流术2例,胆管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合术16例。29例病人中失访6例,死亡1例,平均随访时间为4.7年。在随访的22例病人中有20例一次修复成功,所有随访病人末次手术至今均无明显胆道感染及黄疸。结论:腹腔镜胆囊切除术是高位胆管损伤最主要的原因。只要正确选择手术时机、手术方式,掌握修复技巧,胆管损伤可以获得较好的远期效果。在胆管修补术中,适时留置T管有助于减少术后胆漏和狭窄,一般留置3个月左右。     

腹腔镜胆总管探查手术适应证探讨

目的 探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查术（LCBDE）的手术适应证及其临床疗效。方法 总结分析吉林大学第一医院普外科2005年11月至2008年3月成功开展腹腔镜胆囊切除联合纤维胆道镜胆总管探查术83例病人的临床资料。 结果 成功完成LCBDE 81例,其中二次胆道手术3例,手术成功率97.6％;中转开腹2例,中转率2.4％。平均手术时间90min,平均肠蠕动恢复时间2.6d,平均术后住院8d。胆总管一期缝合1例术后胆汁瘘,术后1周自愈;术后胆道残余结石2例,经T管窦道行胆道镜治愈。无腹腔出血、胃肠道损伤等并发症,全部治愈,带T管出院。术后4周回院常规T管造影拔管。 结论 胆囊结石及胆囊炎合并胆管结石是腹腔镜胆管探查取石术的最佳手术适应证。     

腹腔镜胆道探查胆总管一期缝合术治疗胆管结石的疗效分析

目的探讨腹腔镜下胆道探查术、胆总管一期缝合术的临床疗效与可行性。方法2014年2月至2017年2月收集贵州医科大学附属医院106例胆总管结石病人,男性44例、女性62例,年龄18~75岁,平均(46.5±15.7)岁。106例胆总管结石病人,伴或不伴胆囊结石与肝内胆管结石,其中腹腔镜下胆道探查胆总管一期缝合术67例,腹腔镜下胆道探查T管引流术39例,对两组病例手术适应证、手术时间、术后恢复情况、并发症等进行比较。结果胆总管一期缝合组的手术时间、术后住院天数、腹腔引流管放置时间分别为(72.8±21.0)min、(2.8±1.9)d和(5.5±2.3)d,优于T管引流术组的(95.5±26.5)min、(5.7±1.4)d和(8.1±2.6)d(均P0.05),术后肛门排气时间两组分别为(1.9±0.8)d和(2.1±0.5)d、差异无统计学意义;两组均无肝衰竭、腹腔感染、胆管残余结石、胆道出血及穿孔,胆漏发生率T管引流术组(3例)高于胆总管一期缝合组(0例)(P0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆道探查胆总管一期缝合术治疗胆管结石是安全、可行的,病人明显受益,值得临床推广应用。     

单向倒刺线在腹腔镜肝叶切除联合术中胆道探查中的运用

目的:探讨单向倒刺缝线在腹腔镜下肝叶切除联合术中胆道探查中应用的安全性及有效性。方法:回顾性分析2014年12月—2015年8月期间24例行腹腔镜肝切除联合术中胆道探查术的患者资料,其中10例采用传统缝线缝合胆管(传统缝线组),14例术中采用倒刺线缝合胆管(倒刺线组),比较两组的相关临床资料。结果:所有患者均手术成功,两组患者术前一般资料、术中出血量、术后并发症发生率(肺部感染)、术后住院时间差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05);但倒刺线组手术时间(230.50 min vs.354.68 min)、胆总管缝合时间(5.33 min vs.33.82 min)、肝管缝合时间(9.04 min vs.25.14 min)均明显少于传统缝线组(均P0.05)。所有患者出院1个月返院行T管造影,拔除T管,无结石残留、胆汁漏、胆管狭窄。结论:单向倒刺缝线用于腹腔镜下肝叶切除联合胆道探查术安全、可行,可吸收倒刺缝线的使用可以降低腹腔镜下缝合难度,缩短手术时间和学习曲线,而不增加胆汁渗漏的风险。