床边超声下心包穿刺置管引流治疗急性心包填塞的临床观察

目的评价床边超声下心包穿刺置管引流治疗急性心包填塞安全性与有效性。方法对28例急性心包填塞病人，在病房床边下用二维B超定位和引导心包穿刺后，采用Seldinger技术置入深静脉导管留置间断引流。结果28例患者均一次性穿刺成功，未出现并发症，引流导管留置时间2—13d，引流量400-3500ml，急性心包填塞症状明显缓解。结论床边超声下心包穿刺置管引流治疗急性心包填塞，方法安全有效，特别能使病情危重不宜移动检查病人受益。     

经皮心包穿刺置入中心静脉导管引流心包积液的体会

目的探讨应用Seldinger导管法置入中心静脉导管引流心包积液的疗效及安全性。方法20例中-大量心包积液患者在超声心动图的定位下应用Seldinger穿刺法,分别从心尖部及刽突下经皮置入中心静脉导管间断或持续引流心包积液。结果20例心包积液均一次成功置入中心静脉导管,未出现与导管穿刺相关并发症,引流时间：3—17d,平均5d。引流量305—3000ml,平均908．3ml。结论Seldinger穿刺法置入中心静脉导管引流中-大量心包积液安全有效,由于该操作简单,取材方便,成功率高,明显减少不良反应,可替代传统穿刺方法,便于推广。     

Seldinger技术指导心包穿刺置管引流治疗心包积液

目的 评价Seldinger技术指导心包穿刺置管引流治疗中至大量心包积液的疗效及安全性。方法 中到大量心包积液48例,在超声心动图定位下,采用Seldinger技术,经皮穿刺心包腔并内置深静脉留置导管进行持续或间断引流心包积液。结果 48例患者均1次穿刺并留置导管引流成功．未出现因继发感染、出血、气胸、严重心律失常、心脏穿破及与心包穿刺置管导致的死亡。留置时间时间5～42（10．7±4．7）d,平均引流量为280～1750（590±160）ml。结论 采用Seldinger技术心包穿刺置管引流治疗中至大量心包积液,方法简单,安全有效,成功率高,可替代传统穿刺方法。     

心包穿刺留置中心静脉导管引流心包积液

目的　探讨采用心包穿刺留置中心静脉导管引流心包积液的方法、引流液量控制和引流的体位。方法　患者半坐位或平卧位 ,根据超声心动图定位的穿刺点、穿刺深度及方向 ,1 6例采用剑突下进针 ,36例采取左侧胸壁进针 ,将中心静脉导管置入心包腔内 ,连接无菌引流袋引流心包积液。结果　 52例心包积液患者心包穿刺均获得成功 ,无明显并发症 ,52例患者引流管平均留置时间 1 4 .68± 4.66(8～ 48) d,平均引流量为 790±2 78(32 0～ 2 90 0 ) ml,心包穿刺引流后 ,心包填塞症状缓解或消失 ,心率显著减慢、收缩压和平均压明显升高 (P<0 .0 5)。结论　采用超声心动图定位 ,床边行心包穿刺 ,置入中心静脉导管引流中等量和大量心包积液安全可靠 ,引流彻底 ,疗效可靠 ,无明显并发症。     

中心静脉导管置管引流治疗心包积液38例

目的观察应用中心静脉导管置管引流治疗心包积液的安全性、可行性.方法 38例心包积液病人均应用Seldinger法从剑突下穿刺,将单腔中心静脉导管置入心包腔引流.结果 38例均穿刺成功,引流管留置时间3 d～21 d,平均5.7 d,引流积液量300 mL～3 200 mL,平均634 mL,无明显并发症.结论中心静脉导管经皮穿刺置管引流可用于治疗心包积液.     

中心静脉留置导管在心包积液治疗中的应用

目的：探讨中心静脉留置导管引流心包积液的效果。方法：用改良的Seldinger法经皮穿刺，将中心静脉留置导管置入心包腔内，进行引流、抽液等治疗。结果：25例全部成功，引流心包液300ml～2800ml，留置导管2～20天，无并发症。结论：该法有创伤小，使用简便，减少痛苦等优点。     

B超引导下中心静脉导管留置引流心包积液的临床探讨

目的 探讨床旁B超引导下中心静脉导管留置引流术在心包积液诊治中的临床应用.方法 采用Seldinger法,在床旁B超定位下,于心尖部或剑下穿刺留置中心静脉导管引流心包积液.结果 穿刺及急救心包填塞成功率高.导管留置 3 d～23 d不等,无严重并发症.结论 B超引导下,中心静脉导管留置引流心包积液,具有安全、方便,有效等优点.     

Seldinger导管法心包穿刺置管引流治疗心包积液25例

心包穿刺是治疗心包积液的重要方法之一 ,传统的心包穿刺有一定的危险性 ,1 997年 2月～2 0 0 0年 7月来 ,我们采用 Seldinger导管法 [1]进行心包穿刺抽液 ,为 2 5例心包积液患者安全地施行了心包穿刺留置单腔中心静脉导管引流治疗 ,取得了较好的效果 ,现报道如下 :1　资料与方法1 .1　临床资料 :1 .1 .1　本组全部为住院患者 ,并经 X线检查心影扩大 ,术前均以二维超声确认有心包积液 ,2 5例中男 1 8例 ,女 7例 ,年龄 1 7～ 73岁。心包积液量中等以上并伴有心包填塞症状 1 5例。1 .1 .2　病因 :癌性心包炎 8例 (均示大量心包积液 ) ,结核性…     

超声引导下心包穿刺置管引流术治疗心包积液12例疗效观察

正心包积液是由多种病因引起的临床常见病,大量积液可造成急性心包填塞而严重危及患者生命[1]。心包穿刺置管引流是诊断心包积液性质、减轻心包填塞症状、注入药物的有效方法,该操作具有一定难度和危险性,我科借鉴中心静脉置管操作技术,在超声引导下行中心静脉导管引流心包积液,并在心包腔内注入药物,疗效满意;现对经皮心包穿刺置管引流术治疗的12例心包积液患者进行分析,报告如下。1资料与方法1.1一般资料回顾性分析攀枝花市第二人民医院     

心包穿刺置管引流治疗心包积液的护理

目的探讨心包经皮穿刺置管引流治疗心包积液的护理。方法对10例心包积液患者应用中心静脉导管进行心包穿刺并置管引流,加强术前护理,术中配合,置管后做好体位、留置导管、心理及生活方面的护理指导并密切观察病情。结果10例心包积液患者经皮穿刺置管术均穿刺成功,导管留置时间5～20d,中位时间12d。置管后2例出现穿刺处渗液,1例出现导管松脱,2例发生导管堵塞。结论心包经皮穿刺置管引流是治疗心包积液的安全、有效的方法,做好术前、术中、术后观察和护理,使患者积极配合,可减少并发症的发生,提高患者的生存质量。     

Treatment of patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome with Bosentan

We treated prospectively 14 patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome, with a mean age of 10 years, ranging from 3 to 18 years. Treatment continued for 12 months, and demonstrated a lasting symptomatic improvement, but no improvement in terms of mean saturation of oxygen over 24 hours. Exercise capacity, as judged by peak uptake of oxygen, worsened in the six patients able to perform a treadmill test. The symptomatic benefit from dual blockage of endothelin receptors in these patients may be due to mechanisms other than selective pulmonary vasodilatation alone.     

Satisfaction with ambulatory care of persons with AIDS

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation of patient characteristics and site of care to the perception of ambulatory care quality by persons with AIDS (PWAs). DESIGN: Patient surveys and medical record review were used to determine PWAs’ perceptions of their ambulatory care, self-perceived health status, primary care relationships, sociodemographic characteristics, and severity of illness. SETTING: A public-hospital HIV clinic, an academic group practice, and a staff-model health maintenance organization (HMO) that together care for 20% of all Massachusetts PWAs. PATIENTS: All active patients as of February 12, 1990, and all new AIDS patients at each of the three sites during the subsequent 13 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN BESULTS: The primary outcome measure was a six-item scale of patient-rated quality of care (PRQC), a newly developed measure that combined patients’ ratings of their physician care, nursing care, involvement in medical decisions, and overall quality of care. Multiple logistic regression was carried out with low PRQC (lowest quart He) as the dependent variable, to identify correlates of patient perceptions of poor quality. Patients who had a primary nurse were significantly less likely to have low PRQC scores (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.26 to 0.97). Black patients and patients who used injection drugs were significantly more likely to rate their care in the lowest quartile (OR=2.22, 95% CI=1.04 to 4.78; and OR=2.43, 95% CI=1.13 to 5.23, respectively), as were those who had lower self-perceived health status, after controlling for confounders; no association was found by site or severity. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that primary nursing may be an important determinant of how PWAs rate the quality of their ambulatory care. Furthermore, PWAs who are black or who are injection drug users are less satisfied than are others with the quality of their ambulatory AIDS care. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, April 30, 1993, Arlington, Virginia. Supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, grant number HS06239.     

Experience with the treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with obsidan and isoptin

Forty-five patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were examined clinically and echocardiographically. The results of their treatment with obsidan and isoptin in relation to various types of central hemodynamic disorders are presented. The data have been obtained making it possible to treat patients differentially with regard to the form of the disease. The treatment of this category of patients requires the echocardiographic monitoring of the parameters of the central hemodynamics and myocardial contractility.     

分析老年糖尿病患者应用甘精胰岛素联合阿卡波糖治疗的效果

目的探讨甘精胰岛素联合阿卡波糖在老年糖尿病患者中的临床疗效。方法选取该院2018年7月—2019年7月收治的113例老年糖尿病患者作为研究对象,经随机数字表法,划分A组(n=56,阿卡波糖)和B组(n=57,甘精胰岛素+阿卡波糖),比较两组临床疗效、血糖指标。结果B组患者临床治疗总有效率显著高于A组;经治疗,B组患者空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 hPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)水平明显低于A组。两组之间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在老年糖尿病患者中应用甘精胰岛素+阿卡波糖,临床疗效显著,使患者的空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白等指标得到了明显改善,安全性强。     

Evaluation of atrial vulnerability with transoesophageal stimulation in patients with atrioventricular junctional: Comparison with patients with ventricular pre-excitation and with normal subjects

The aim of our work was to evaluate the inducibility of atrialfibrillation in a group of patients with atrioventricular junctionalreentrant tachycardia and to compare it with that of patientswith a Kent-type ventricular pre-excitation (Wolff-Parkinson-Whitesyndrome) and a control group. One hundred and twenty-five subjects were separated into groups.Group 1 comprised 49 Wolff-Parkinson-White patients, with amean age of 26.4, range 10.66 years; group 2, 51 patients withatrioventricular junctional reentrant tachycardia inducibleby transoesophageal atrial stimulation andlor clinically documented,with a mean age of 43.4, range 16–78 years; group 3, 25control subjects with a mean age of2.64, range 13–76 years. Each subject underwent atrial transoesophageal stimulation withthe following protocol: programmed atrial stimulation with 1and 2 stimuli during atrial pacing of 100. min^–1 and 150.min^–1; atrial stimulation for 10 s at a rate of 200–300–400–500–600.min^–1 with intervals of 10 s between stimulations, fivesuccessive ‘ramp-up’ atrial stimulations for 9 swith the rate increasing from 100 to 800. min^–1 with intervalsof 10 s between stimulations. The end point was the completionof the protocol or induction of sustained atrial fibrillation(>1 min). The chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Our resultsshowed that in group 1 atrial fibrillation was induced in 27149patients (55.1%); this was sustained in 13149 (26.5%) and non-sustainedin 14149 (28.5%); in group 2, atrial fibrillation was inducedin 22151 patients (43.0%); it was sustained in 7151 (13.7%)and non-sustained in 15151 (29.4%); in group 3, sustained atrialfibrillation was not induced in any subject and in only onesubject was a non-sustained atrial fibrillation (4 s) induced. The chi-square test showed that group 2 vs group 1 were non-significant,while group 2 vs group 3 and group 1 vs group 3 were significant(P<0.003 and P<0.0007, respectively). Therefore group 2 patients showed a greater atrial vulnerabilityin comparison to the control subjects and a similar vulnerabilityto group 1 patients. It is possible that the greater atrialvulnerability in the patients of group 2 was due to the doublenodal pathway.